America As the Partner of Choice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

America As the Partner of Choice The Honorable R. Clarke Cooper Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs Remarks at the Meridian International Center Meridian House, Washington D.C., October 31 2019 America as the Partner of Choice Introduction Good morning. I am delighted to be here with you all, and am grateful to my former colleague, Ambassador Stuart Holliday, and Meridian International for hosting us in this remarkable and historic setting. Over the years, as I have walked through those magnificent oaken doors, like many of you, I always notice the Latin inscription above them which reads “Quo habitat felicitas nil intret mali” – which I believe means “Where happiness dwells, evil shall not enter.” And it occurred to me, with minor adjustment, it could easily be the motto for our international security partnerships: Quo habitat amicitia nil intret mali: Where friendship dwells, evil shall not enter. Let me explain: I stand before you at a difficult time for American partnerships – at a time when, for the first time perhaps since the end of the Cold War, many nations look at partnering with America on matters of defense and security not as an imperative, but as one of several options. Today I would like to make the case for why choosing the United States as a security partner remains far and away the best choice for nations around the world. First, I would like to address the competitive environment we face. It is true the United States remains far and away the greatest provider both of direct security through the deterrence of our alliances and the presence of our global forces, true we remain the single greatest provider of grant security assistance, to the tune of over $10 billion a year between State and Defense, and, true we remain far and away the most significant source of defensive equipment for countries around the world. But it is equally true our competitors are turning to arms sales and security assistance as key tools to build their own influence around the world, and to weaken ours. Through the targeted marketing of systems like the S-400, Russia seeks to exploit the genuine security requirements of partners to create challenges in our ability – legal and technological – to provide them with the most advanced defensive capabilities. And through a combination of cut-price systems such as unmanned aerial systems, predatory financing mechanisms, and sometimes outright bribery, China is using arms transfers as a means of getting its foot in the door – a door that, once opened, China quickly exploits both to exert influence and to gather intelligence. And at the same time, it is true there are a number of longstanding criticisms of U.S. security assistance and arms transfers whose basis in facts we cannot ignore – and indeed, must address. And so today I would like to take a fine toothed comb to that competition; to address those criticisms; and, to make absolutely clear why the positive case for the United States as the security partner of choice is stronger now than ever. Competitor Efforts: A Summary and Critique Let me first talk about the efforts being made by our strategic competitors to proliferate arms around the world. We have come a long way since the AK- 47 became the ubiquitous symbol of Soviet-backed insurgencies from Southeast Asia to Africa. Today, Russia is working hard to foist variants of its S-400 air defense system around the world, while China is supplying everything from armored personnel carriers to armed drones. To quote another Latin phrase – caveat emptor! – Buyer, beware. We have seen countries around the world leap at the chance to obtain high-tech, low cost defensive capabilities, only to see their significant investments crumble and rust in their hands. In Africa, Cameroon procured four Harbin Z-9 attack helicopters in 2015: one crashed shortly after being handed over. Kenya invested in Norinco VN4 armored personnel carriers – vehicles that China’s own sales representative declined to sit inside during a test firing. But since going ahead with the purchase regardless, sadly dozens of Kenyan personnel have been reportedly killed in those vehicles, with Kenya’s The Standard writing in an editorial that “It is saddening that even after such deaths, our officers continue to patrol the border on pick-up trucks and sham Chinese-made armoured personnel carriers, despite the omnipresent danger of running over IEDs.” Caveat emptor! And similarly, amongst our partners in the Middle East, we’ve seen instances in which countries that have procured Chinese CH-4 armed drones have found them to be inoperable within months, and are now turning around to get rid of them. Caveat emptor! Or let’s talk about the training offered by China. You are all, of course, familiar with the United States’ own International Military Education and Training (IMET) program, through which we bring officers and NCOs from our partners into U.S. schoolhouses where they sit beside our own personnel, receiving the same world class training. Not so in China. Foreign trainees may be wooed by the offer of unit-scale training in China, but on arrival they are disappointed to find themselves not spread among the elite Chinese training academies, but are lumped together with forces from around the world of significantly varying quality in China’s International Military Education Exchange Center – a facility whose lackadaisical approach to military education is well below the standard China provides to its own officers. Caveat emptor! Criticisms of U.S. security assistance and arms transfer policies & process I will now turn to some of the criticisms levied against the U.S. as a security partner, which fall broadly into two categories: matters of policy, and matters of process. Let us start with which is the most pressing and visible at this time: our reliability as a partner at a time where the debate in Washington about our assistance and arms transfers appears more politicized than ever. Earlier this summer, when this Administration advanced, via Emergency Certification, a range of arms transfers to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan, Congressional opposition was sufficient for passage of three Joint Resolutions of Disapproval, and while these fell far short of the votes needed to overcome the President’s veto, it is no secret that such opposition contributes to doubts about the U.S. as a supplier in times of need. And similarly, it was only within the last few weeks that, in response to Turkey’s incursion into Syria, we ourselves from within the Administration made the decision to restrict arms sales to the Turkish Ministry of National Defense. Why, on a matter so critical to a nation as its national defense, should it partner with a nation whose willingness to continue to supply it during a time of crisis may be found lacking? I will answer with three words: quality, transparency, and accountability. First, U.S. defense industry produces the best defensive equipment on the planet. Our cutting edge technology, the skill of our workmanship, and the demand driven by our own world-leading military combine to mean that when a country obtains U.S. origin defensive systems, it is obtaining the best. Second, U.S. arms transfers are not a matter of secrecy, and rarely are the decisions surrounding them. Unlike the determinations made in Beijing or Moscow, our major foreign military and direct commercial sales are managed via a process whose policies are clear and transparent, and whose approvals are public. To anyone who asks whether a sale is likely or not, I would refer you to the Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, most recently reissued by President Trump in 2018. In this public document, you will find all arms transfers are vetted against the same factors, which includes regional balances of power, restraint against proliferation, and impact on human rights. And I would refer you as well to our own website where scores of country policies applicable to our direct commercial sales are published, available to all. And I would point you to the Congressional Record, where every arms sale notification is listed, and where the debate of the Members of Congress on such sales is recorded. Yes, it is true different circumstances warrant different considerations of sales – and the actions taken by partners may indeed weigh into the question of what capability the United States is willing and able to transfer to them. But this is true for every supplier of arms. What makes America uniquely different is that while each transfer undergoes a case-by-case review relevant to its specific context, the policy that frames our decisions is known, our processes recorded, our decisions public. This is the most basic form of dependability: it is the epitome of transparency, integrity and accountability. There are a number of complaints hoisted that relate more to the process by which U.S. arms transfers occur, such as the cost of U.S. equipment and the length of time it can take for delivery. In response to these concerns, when President Trump issued the 2018 Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, he included in its text something no President had done before: a directive for the interagency to come up with a plan to implement the policy, including by looking across the scope of the security assistance enterprise for solutions to some of these long-enduring criticisms. So let me update you on what we have actually accomplished: We made the foreign military sales process faster and cheaper, reducing the time it takes from receipt of a partner’s request to making an offer by nine percent, while reducing the overhead fees captured by the FMS Admin surcharge from 3.5 percent to 3.2 percent and lowering several FMS Transportation rates by between one percent and 7.5 percent, saving foreign partners approximately $180 million in the past year alone.
Recommended publications
  • Declaration on Civility and Inclusive Leadership
    DeclarPages08_finalALTS:Layout 1 4/25/08 11:32 AM Page 1 CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY Declaration on Civility and Inclusive Leadership THIRD EDITION he coming years demand greatness from our nation’s leaders and our citizens, as we navigate the significant domestic and international challenges that threaten our nation’s security and long-term prosperity. The difficulty of this task is magnified by our country’s political divisions, for today we are too much a house divided. Yet, if we unite to turn challenges into opportunities and pursue common goals, we surely will write another great chapter in America’s history. Civility and inclusive leadership are proven means of bridging political divisions and forging national unity and commitment. National resolve and unity of purpose are essential for marshalling the best talent, regardless of party affiliation, and are the elements required to develop a strategic consensus on the way forward. Civility does not require citizens to give up cherished beliefs or “dilute” their convictions. Rather, it requires respect, listening, and trust when interacting with those who hold differing viewpoints. Indeed, civility and inclusive leadership have often been exercised in the American experience as a means of moving to higher, common ground and developing more creative approaches to realize shared aspirations. Accordingly, the National Committee to Unite a Divided America strongly urges America’s leaders to draw strength and wisdom from our nation’s greatest achievements arising from inclusiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Download *.PDF
    6,013 LEADERS PARTICIPATED IN MERIDIAN’S LEADERSHIP EXCHANGES, FORUMS, CULTURAL DIPLOMACY INITIATIVES, AND TRAINING PROGRAMS 174 COUNTRIES REPRESENTED IN MERIDIAN PROGRAMS 359 LEADERSHIP EXCHANGES, FORUMS, CULTURAL DIPLOMACY INITIATIVES, AND TRAINING PROGRAMS PRODUCED BY MERIDIAN MERIDIAN 2015 Innovation by participants in the Women in Science STEAM ANNUAL REPORT Camp, led by Meridian MEET MERIDIAN MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER IS A NONPROFIT, GLOBAL LEADERSHIP ORGANIZATION HEADQUARTERED IN YOUTH WASHINGTON, D.C. GOVERNANCE AND LEADERSHIP TRANSPARENCY DEVELOPMENT OUR VISION WE ENVISION A MORE SECURE AND PROSPEROUS WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING, INNOVATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND INCLUSION. THE PATH TO REALIZING THIS VISION IS THROUGH MORE EFFECTIVE AND CONNECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR LEADERSHIP AT ALL LEVELS. MEDIA AND BUSINESS JOURNALISM AND TRADE OUR MISSION TO CREATE INNOVATIVE EXCHANGE, EDUCATION, CULTURAL, AND POLICY PROGRAMS THAT ADVANCE THREE GOALS: STRENGTHEN U.S. ENGAGEMENT WITH THE WORLD THROUGH THE POWER OF EXCHANGE. PREPARE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR LEADERS FOR A COMPLEX GLOBAL FUTURE. PROVIDE A NEUTRAL FORUM FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN AND ENERGY AND THE COLLABORATION ACROSS SECTORS. CIVIL RIGHTS ENVIRONMENT LEADERSHIP MESSAGE DEAR MERIDIAN FRIENDS, 2015 was a year of many “firsts” for the Meridian team. We took on new challenges and launched into uncharted territory in every aspect of our work to advance effective global leadership. More inspiring is that much of our work in 2015 was focused on younger generations. We believe that those generations provide opportunities for empowering future Presidents, CEOs, and the private and public sector leaders who will work towards a more secure and prosperous world. To CULTURAL advance this cause, our team developed innovative programs that combine more than 50 years of experience preparing the world’s leaders with new tools needed for succeeding in today’s competitive global environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Safeguarding Endangered Cultural Heritage Sites in the Developing World
    Safeguarding Endangered Cultural Heritage Sites in the Developing World Global Heritage Fund About Global Heritage Fund Global Heritage Fund (GHF) is an international conservancy whose mission is to protect, preserve, and sustain the most signi!cant and endangered cultural heritage sites in the developing world. GHF utilizes our 360-degree Preservation by Design® methodology of community-based planning, science, development, and partnerships to enable long-term preservation and development of global heritage sites. In 2010, we launched Global Heritage Network (GHN), an early warning and threat monitoring system using state-of-the-art satellite imaging technology to enable collaboration between international experts and local conservation leaders to identify and mitigate man-made threats. Since 2002, GHF has invested over $20 million and secured $18 million in co-funding for 16 global heritage sites to ensure their sustainable preservation and responsible development. Contents 5 Foreword 6 Executive Summary 13 A Silent Crisis: Our Global Heritage in Peril 17 Why Heritage Matters 19 The State of Global Heritage 29 The Global Heritage Opportunity 37 Balancing Preservation and Development 43 The Way Forward 46 Recommendations 62 Appendices 66 The Editorial Committee 68 Acknowledgments 68 Online Resources © 2010 Global Heritage Fund Saving Our Vanishing Heritage: Safeguarding Endangered Cultural Heritage Sites in the Developing World Global Heritage Fund Palo Alto, California USA +1.650.325.7520 www.globalheritagefund.org Sponsor: Cover: Local women from Anagundi wash their clothes in the river next to the archaeological sites of Hampi, India. Photo: Sourav Dev Vanishing begins a global campaign to save the most important and endangered heritage sites in the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Annual Report 2011
    ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Dedicated to the memory of Trustee The Honorable Charles T. Manatt friend, supporter, visionary. He is deeply missed. Chairman and President’s Message Meridian is building on the momentum of our 50th anniversary by launching new programs and projects that propel our leadership into the 21st century. Our traditional programs of exchange, exhibitions, seminars, and gatherings are all strengthened and revitalized by new technological applications that enable us to access more audiences, broaden our outreach, and expand our knowledge base. Meridian is the one place in Washington, D.C. where you can find leadership preparation, educational exchanges, and networks that circle the globe. We continue to focus on our mission to create innovative exchange, educational, cultural, and policy programs in order to advance three goals: • Strengthen U.S. engagement with the world through the power of exchange; • Prepare public and private sector leaders for a complex global future; and • Provide a neutral forum for international collaboration across sectors. In 2011, we expanded our reach through projects and partnerships such as: • An historic U.S.-China cultural initiative that builds bridges of understanding at a critical time for the U.S.- China relationship; • A Meridian India Initiative that forges new ties between U.S. and Indian business, political, and civil society leaders; • A Memorandum of Understanding signed with Washington D.C.’s Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center to partner on convening larger conferences and events, promote business and trade relation- ships, and highlight cultural opportunities. 2011 also brought successes such as the new U.S.-France Strategic Dialogue and programs like Insights at Meridian, which serve the diplomatic community here in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Annual Report 2008
    1 BOARD OF Chairman Hon. James R. Jones Dr. Malik Hasan TRUSTEES Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Chairman Manatt Jones HealthTrio, Inc. Global Strategies Ms. Mary L. Howell Executive Vice President Ms. Gina Adams* Textron Inc. Corporate Vice President, Government Affairs FedEx Corporation Mr. Leo C. Jardot Vice President, Government Relations Ms. Sarah Alexander Wyeth President Emerging Markets Private Equity Association Mrs. Sandie Knollenberg* Ms. Lisa Barry Mr. Fritz-Alan Korth* Vice President and General Manager, Attorney Government Affairs Korth & Korth Chevron Corporation Mr. Jack Krumholtz* Mrs. Robert Bennett Director of Federal Government Affairs Microsoft Ms. Judith Heisley Bishop President & Executive Director Mr. Philip C. Lauinger, Jr. Heisley Family Foundation Chairman and CEO Ambassador James R. Jones Lauinger Publishing Co. Hon. James J. Blanchard, Chairman Elect Partner Hon. Delano E. Lewis Chair, Government Affairs Practice Group Senior Fellow DLA Piper New Mexico State University Hon. Julia Chang Bloch Susan Blumenthal Markey, M.D. President Fmr. U.S. Assistant Surgeon General US-China Education Trust Rear Admiral, USPHS (ret.) Hon. Christopher Burnham Hon. Charles T. Manatt Vice Chairman & Managing Director Co-Chairman Deutsche Bank Asset Management Manatt Jones Global Strategies, LLC Mrs. Stephanie Chafee* Mrs. Howard “Buck” McKeon The Sophie and Murray Danforth Foundation Mr. Tobia G. Mercuro Mr. Martin dePorres Cargas Vice President Mr. F. Joseph Moravec Global & Environmental Policy Principal Anheuser-Busch InBev F. Joseph Moravec, LLC Mr. Oliver Chanler Ms. Maura McGill Mudd Management Consultant Mrs. Meryl Chertoff Director, Sandra Day O’Connor Mr. Greg Pensabene* Project on the State of the Judiciary Vice President, Government Georgetown University Law Center Relations & Public Affairs Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Annual Report 2009
    1 BOARD OF Chairman Governor James J. Blanchard Hon. James R. Jones TRUSTEES Partner and Chair Chief Executive Officer Government Affairs Practice Group Manatt Jones Global Strategies, LLC DLA Piper US, LLP Hon. Tom C. Korologos Ms. Sarah Alexander Strategic Advisor President DLA Piper US, LLP Emerging Markets Private Equity Association Mr. Philip C. Lauinger, Jr. Ms. Lisa Barry Chairman and CEO Vice President, Government Affairs Lauinger Publishing Co. Chevron Corporation Hon. Charles T. Manatt Mrs. Robert Bennett Co-Chairman U.S. Senate Spouse (R-UT) Manatt Jones Global Strategies, LLC Hon. Julia Chang Bloch Mrs. Howard “Buck” McKeon President U.S. Congressional Spouse (R-CA) US-China Education Trust Governor James J. Blanchard Mr. Tobia Mercuro Susan Blumenthal Markey, M.D. Former President Fmr. U.S. Assistant Surgeon General Riverton Investment Corporation Rear Admiral, USPHS (ret.) Mr. David Metzner Hon. Christopher Burnham Managing Partner Vice Chairman & Managing Director American Continental Group Deutsche Bank Asset Management Mr. F. Joseph Moravec Charles H. Camp, Esquire Principal Law Offices of Charles H. Camp F. Joseph Moravec, LLC Mr. Oliver Chanler Mr. Evan Morris Board of Directors Member VP, Federal Government Affairs and Genesee Valley Conservancy Public Policy Roche Pharmaceuticals Mrs. Meryl Chertoff Co-Director Ms. Lisa Nelson Justice & Society Program Head of Global Government Relations Aspen Institute Visa Inc. Mr. Jim Clifton Ms. Mary O’Connor Chairman & CEO Director of Outreach Gallup Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress Ms. Josephine Cooper Group VP, Government & Industry Mr. Nels Olson Toyota Motor North America Managing Director, Eastern Region Korn/Ferry International Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 14 October 2004 English Original: Arabiclchineselenglishl Frenchlrussianlspanish
    United Nations A~C.~IWINFI~ General Assembly Distr.: General 14 October 2004 English Original: ArabiclChineselEnglishl FrenchlRussianlSpanish (-*\>\ -41) ,hI\.*\, -ww LU\$U\ i% budJ,% -4\’Ld %a@*a*naiLmw&ww(11egS6i4k ) Membership of the Special Political and Decolonizntion Committee (Fourth Committee) Membm de la Commission des questions politiqua spbciales et de la dkoloniration (Quatrihe Commission) Ynensl KoMHTCTa no cneumanbnslm nonmTwecKmm eonpocam H eonpoem II~KOJIOHH~~UHH(’lcreeprslR KomwTer) Miembror de la Comlsi6n Polltica Especial y de De~colomizaci611(Cuarta Comlsibn) ;bJG ‘~j~\*~~\W~IJ\~~~L!~\i~\.!srj,;3\r)3\~~~-:o)T3J .bbh ijLk\ ip.L S-2977K $, u$\ <d\@\ &\. %& :tB~R~&~#~%r~r~m~m~~O~~~~~ S-2977K BBDsfl*%ff. Note: Delegations are requested to send their corrections to the following list in writing to the Secretary of the Committee, room S-2977J, Secretariat Building Note: Les delegations sont prites d’envoyer leurs corrections A la presentc liste. par Ccrit. au Secretaire de la Commission, bureau S-29771, BBtimcnt du Secrttariat. npwevanue: AenerauHaM npennaracrcr nocnm C~OHHcnpaaenHw K nacroitueuy cnncwy I nHcbuennoA gopue cerperapm KoMuwra. KOMUPTP S-29711. ~RP.HH~CcuperapnaTa. Nom: Se ruega a Ian delegaciones se sirvan enviar sus correcciones 8 la siguiente lista, por ercrito. a la Secretaria de la Comirion. oficina S-2977J, Edificio de la Secretarla. si J‘ 33% Chairman Prisidenl npedcedamenb Presidenre H.E. Mr. Kyaw Tint Swe (Mynumar) .pi>\ *\y Plfsir Vice-Chairmen Vice-PrPsidents 3anrecmumenu npedcedamena Ylcepresidenres Mr. Helfried Carl Mr. Eduardo Calderbn Mr. Aadrej Droba (Austria) (Ecuador) (Slovak Republic) li” R81eFEi Rapporteur Aounaduuu Relator Mr. Kais Kabtani (Tunisia) 04-55422 (E) 181004 Advisers Conreillerr COWTHWICH Consejrros ~ M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Program
    #MeridianSummit meridian.org/summit OCTOBER 16, 2015 | WASHINGTON, DC FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS AGENDA OPENING REMARKS AMBASSADOR STUART W. HOLLIDAY President and CEO, Meridian International Center WELCOME REMARKS ANDREW GELFUSO Vice President of Global Business Development, Office of Trade Promotion Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center GALLUP GLOBAL REPORT: WHERE THE GREAT JOBS ARE JON CLIFTON Managing Director, Gallup Global Analytics WHY FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS: U.S. LEADERSHIP CONGRESSMAN ED ROYCE (R-CA) Chairman, House Foreign Affairs Committee CONGRESSMAN ELIOT ENGEL (D-NY) Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee Moderated by ALONZO L. FULGHAM Vice President, Strategy and Sustainable International Development, CH2M Hill WHY FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS: MANAGING THE GLOBAL ECONOMY SECRETARY CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ Chair, Albright Stonebridge Group Chairman, Meridian International Center A Conversation with SHAWN DONNAN World Trade Editor, Financial Times 3 AGENDA WHY FOREIGN POLICY MATTERS: THE POWER OF CULTURE IN BUSINESS DEE DEE MYERS Executive Vice President, Worldwide Corporate Communications and Public Affairs, Warner Bros. MILES YOUNG Worldwide Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ogilvy & Mather Moderated by DR. CURTIS SANDBERG Senior Vice President of Arts and Cultural Programs, Meridian International Center AMERICAN SENTIMENTS TOWARDS FOREIGN POLICY ANTONY J. BLINKEN Deputy Secretary of State, U.S. Department of State GLOBAL LEADERSHIP SPOTLIGHT JAMES QUINCEY President and Chief Operating Officer, The Coca-Cola Company A Conversation with AMBASSADOR STUART W. HOLLIDAY President and CEO, Meridian International Center CLOSING REMARKS AMBASSADOR BEATRICE WELTERS AND ANTHONY WELTERS 2015 Meridian Ball Chairs 4 SUMMIT SPONSORS DIPLOMAT’S CIRCLE CRESCENT CIRCLE TERRACE CIRCLE 5 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND THE PRESIDENT Welcome to the Meridian Global Leadership Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of America
    Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS Submitted to the U.S. Department of State and VOICESU.S. House of Representatives OF Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs AMERICA U.S. Public Diplomacy for the 21st Century THE FOREIGN POLICY PROGRAM AT BROOKINGS and THE BROOKINGS PROJECT ON U.S. RELATIONS WITH THE ISLAMIC WORLD 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20036 brookings.edu KRISTIN M. LORD November 2008 Foreign Policy at BROOKINGS VOICES OF AMERICA U.S. Public Diplomacy for the 21st Century KRISTIN M. LORD November 2008 THE FOREIGN POLICY PROGRAM AT BROOKINGS and THE BROOKINGS PROJECT ON U.S. RELATIONS WITH THE ISLAMIC WORLD About Brookings The Brookings Institution is a private nonprofit organization devoted to research, education, and publication on important issues of domestic and foreign policy. Its principal purpose is to bring the highest quality research and analysis to bear on current and emerging policy problems. Interpretations or conclusions in Brookings publications should be understood to be solely those of the authors. Copyright © 2008 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 www.brookings.edu ISBN-13:978-0-8157-0302-0 Table of Contents Board of Advisers . .v Acknowledgements........................................................................ix Executive Summary . .1 Introduction..............................................................................3 The World America Faces ..................................................................7 The
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2004 No. 113 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 21, 2004, at 12:30 p.m. Senate MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2004 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was RECOGNITION OF THE ACTING The Chair inquires, does the Senator called to order by the President pro MAJORITY LEADER from Nevada wish to suggest the ab- tempore [Mr. STEVENS]. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The sence of a quorum? Senator from Kentucky is recognized. Mr. REID. I suggest the absence of a quorum. PRAYER f The PRESIDING OFFICER. The The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- SCHEDULE clerk will call the roll. The assistant legislative clerk pro- fered the following prayer: Mr. MCCONNELL. Mr. President, ceeded to call the roll. Let us pray. today we will have a period for morn- Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask O Lord our God, restorer of the joy of ing business throughout the afternoon. unanimous consent that the order for those who find You, we praise Your Under a previous unanimous-consent the quorum call be rescinded. holy name. Thank You for giving us agreement, we will vote on passage of The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without lifetime favor and for Your unchanging the Military Construction appropria- objection, it is so ordered. The Senator faithfulness. You turn our mourning tions bill at 5:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking Washingtonгs Deadlock to Save Americaгs Future
    PROSPERITY OR DECLINE? BREAKING WASHINGTON¶S DEADLOCK TO SAVE AMERICA¶S FUTURE 7KH6WUHQJWKHQLQJ$PHULFD¶V)XWXUH,QLWLDWLYH Final Report A Project of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress Project Convener David Abshire Project Steering Committee Co-Chairs Norman Augustine Roy Romer David Walker Principal Project Supporter -1- Center for the Study of the PreSidenCy and CongreSS THE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress, founded in 1965, is a non- profit, non-SDUWLVDQ F RUJDQL]DWLRQ 7KH &HQWHU¶V PLVVLRQ LV WR SURPRWH leadership in the Presidency and the Congress to generate innovative solutions to current national challenges; preserve the historic memory of the Presidency by identifying the lessons from the successes and failures of such leadership; draw on a wide range of talent to offer ways to better organize an increasingly compartmentalized Federal government; DQGHGXFDWHDQGLQVSLUHWKHQH[WJHQHUDWLRQRI$PHULFD¶VOHDGHUVWRLQFRUSRUDWHFLYLOity, inclusiveness, and character into their public and private lives and discourse. PROSPERITY OR DECLINE? BREAKING WASHINGTON¶S DEADLOCK TO SAVE AMERICA¶S FUTURE Copyright © 2010 CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Published in the United States of America. CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS 1020 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 250 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: 202-872-9800 Fax: 202-872-9811 www.thePresidency.org -2- Prosperity or deCline? Breaking WaShington’S deadloCk to Save ameriCa’S future Table of Contents LETTER FROM THE PROJECT CO-CHAIRS««««««««««««««««««.««4 PREFACE«««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««...«6 INTRODUCTION««««««««««««««««««««««............«««««10 THE FIRST CLIMB ± THE FISCAL CRISIS AND JOBS««««««««««««««20 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Urnalusa
    JOURNALURNALUSA U.S. PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITIONS U.S. DEPARTMENT 0F STATE / BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION PROGRAMS The Bureau of International Information Programs of the U.S. Department of State publishes a monthly electronic journal under the eJournal USA logo. These journals examine major issues facing the United States and the international community, as well as U.S. society, values, thought, and institutions. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE / JanuarY 2009/ VOLUME 14 / NUMBER 1 One new journal is published monthly in English and is http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournals.html followed by versions in French, Portuguese, Russian, and Spanish. Selected editions also appear in Arabic, Chinese, and Persian. Each journal is catalogued by volume and International Information Programs: number. Coordinator Jeremy F. Curtin The opinions expressed in the journals do not necessarily Executive Editor Jonathan Margolis reflect the views or policies of the U.S. government. The U.S. Department of State assumes no responsibility for the content and continued accessibility of Internet sites to which the journals link; such responsibility resides Creative Director George Clack solely with the publishers of those sites. Journal articles, Editor-in-Chief Richard W. Huckaby photographs, and illustrations may be reproduced and Associate Editor Charlene Porter translated outside the United States unless they carry Production Manager Susan L. Doner explicit copyright restrictions, in which case permission Assistant Production Manager Chloe D. Ellis must be sought from the copyright holders noted in the Web Producer Janine Perry journal. The Bureau of International Information Programs maintains current and back issues in several electronic formats, as well as a list of upcoming journals, at Copy Editor Kathleen Hug http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournals.html.
    [Show full text]