Mortgage Lenders:Layout 1.Qxd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mortgage Lenders:Layout 1.Qxd TheMadnessof MortgageLenders Housingfinanceandthefinancialcrisis ByProfessorChrisHamnett,DepartmentofGeography, King’sCollegeLondon May2009 Tomorrow’sCapitalism www.ippr.org/tomorrowscapitalism 2 Tomorrow’sCapitalism|TheMadnessofMortgageLenders Aboutippr TheInstituteforPublicPolicyResearch(ippr)istheUK’sleadingprogressivethinktank, producingcutting-edgeresearchandinnovativepolicyideasforajust,democraticand sustainableworld.Since1988,wehavebeenattheforefrontofprogressivedebateand policymakingintheUK.Throughourindependentresearchandanalysiswedefinenew agendasforchangeandprovidepracticalsolutionstochallengesacrossthefullrangeof publicpolicyissues. WithofficesinbothLondonandNewcastle,weensureouroutlookisasbroad-based aspossible,whileourinternationalandmigrationteamsandclimatechange programmeextendourpartnershipsandinfluencebeyondtheUK,givingusatruly world-classreputationforhighqualityresearch. ippr,30-32SouthamptonStreet,LondonWC2E7RA.Tel:+44(0)2074706100 E:[email protected] ThispaperwasfirstpublishedinMay2009.©ippr2009 ‘Tomorrow’sCapitalism’ Tomorrow’sCapitalismisamajorprogrammeofworkpresentedbyipprinconjunction withFriendsProvidentFoundation.Itaimstoexplorethefutureofourfinancialand economicsystem.Formoredetailsandtoaccessotherpapersfromtheprogrammevisit www.ippr.org/tomorrowscapitalism Theviewsinthispaperarethoseoftheauthoronlyanddonotnecessarilyrepresent thoseofipprorFriendsProvident. 3 Tomorrow’sCapitalism|TheMadnessofMortgageLenders Introduction:theproblem WeareallfamiliarwiththecollapseoftheUKhousingmarketsinceitspeakinautumn 2007.Housepriceshavefallen20percentfromtheirpeak,thenumberofsalesisdown50 percent–asisthevolumeofmortgagelending–andnewhousingstartsaredownby around70percenttoaprojected60,000in2009.Inaddition,mortgagearrearsandthe levelofrepossessionshaverisensharply.Thehousingmarketisintrouble. Thisisnotthefirsthousingmarketdownturnofthisnature.Sincetheearly1970sthere havebeenseveral,mostnotablythemajorslumpofthefirsthalfofthe1990swhenprices andturnoverfellsharplyfromtheirpeakof1988.Whatmakesthisslumpdifferentfrom previousonesisthatithasbeenaccompaniedby,ifnotdirectlytriggeredby,thecollapseor takeoverofdemutualisedmortgagelenderswhohadexpandedfartoorapidlyduringthe precedingdecadebyofferingverygenerousloan-to-valueandloan-to-incomeratios,funded byshort-termborrowingonthewholesalemoneymarkets.Whenthecreditcrisishitin summer2007,itbecameclearthattheywereunabletorollovertheirloansandtheyhadto turntotheGovernmentforhelp,whichledtomanybeingtakenoverorsold.Inaddition,it hassincebecomeclearthatanumberofmutualbuildingsocietieshavegotintotroubleby makingcommercialloansatornearthetopofthepropertymarketorbyenteringthe marketforsub-primemortgages. Theargumentthatthispapermakesisthatthehousingbubble,andthesubsequent collapse,oweagreatdealtotherecklesslendingbehaviourofanumberofmortgage lenders,particularlythedemutualisedlenderssuchasNorthernRock,theAllianceand LeicesterandtheBradfordandBingley,whoweredrivenbyhighlyincentivisedsenior executivesinadriveformarketshareandexpansion.Insodoing,theyabandonedmanyof theprinciplesofsoundlendingthathadguidedthebuildingsocietiesfordecadesandfailed tolearntheveryclearlessonsofthelate1980sandearly1990shousingmarketboomand bust.Theearly1990sslumpgeneratedsignificantlossesformortgagelendersandled 500,000ownerstoberepossessed. Clearly,borrowersmustalsobearsomeresponsibilityfortakingonbigmortgageswhen marketsareboomingandpricesarehigh,butmortgagelendershaveadutytoensurethat theloanstheymakearenotexcessiveandthattherisksoffailuretorepayareminimised. TotalgrossmortgagelendingintheUKrosefrom£115billionin1999to£364billionin 2007:amorethanthreefoldincreaseineightyears.Thishelpedfueltheboominprices. Thekeyquestionwhichmustbeaskedis:Aremortgagelenderscapableoflearningfrom historyoraretheydoomedtorepeatit?Atpresent,theevidenceclearlysuggeststhelatter whichpointstotheneedforstronggovernmentorregulatoryinterventiontosteerthem awayfromthispath. Theproblemsinthehomeownershipmarkethavebeenreinforcedbytheverylowlevelsof socialhousingconstructionandtheshrinkageofthesector.Sincetheintroductionofthe RighttoBuyin1980,andthesteadyshrinkageoffundingfornewcouncilhousing,Britain hasbecomeapredominantlyowner-occupiedsocietywithagrowingbuy-to-letsector.While homeownershipremainsthepreferredtenureforthegreatmajorityofhouseholds,itraises thequestionofwhetheritissensibleorappropriateforhouseholdstobuywhenthereisa distinctpossibilityofthemgettingintonegativeequityorlosingtheirhomesthrough repossession.Asignificantnumberofsmallbuy-to-letinvestorshavealsolostsubstantial sumsofmoneyhavingbeentemptedbytheprospectoflargereturnsthathavenot materialised.Forthem,buy-to-lethasbecomebuy-to-lose.Attheendof2008,some1.2 millionbuy-to-letmortgageswereoutstanding,10percentofthetotalstock. 4 Tomorrow’sCapitalism|TheMadnessofMortgageLenders Thestructureofthepaperisasfollows. •First,itsetsoutthenatureofBritain’sstronglycyclicalhousingmarketandthe previoushistoryofboomsandbusts. •Second,itrecapssomeofthekeyeventsinthehistoryofthesub-primemortgage lendingproblemintheUnitedStatesandthesubsequentcreditcrisisandtheimpacts ontheUKmortgagelenders. •Third,itlooksattheliberalisationofmortgagelendingintheearly-mid1980swhich setthesceneforthecurrentproblems.Itpaysparticularattentiontothelending practicesofNorthernRockandtheBradfordandBingley.(SeealsotheAppendix, wihcdescribestheriseandfallofNorthernRock). •Lastly,itsetsoutwhatneedstobedoneintermsofgovernmentpolicytoensure thattheproblemsdonotoccurathirdtime. TheUK’scyclicalhomeownershipmarket Thedownturninthehousingmarketwhichbeganinautumn2007wasnotasurprise.The marketwasgrosslyovervaluedandpriceshadtofalltorestoresomesemblanceof affordability.Fromthisperspective,housepricefallsarenotadisasterbutawelcome necessity.Housepriceshadrisensofarabovetheirlong-termtrendlinesince2000thata correctionwasnecessary,ashadpreviouslyoccurredinthemid1970s,theearly1980sand mostdramaticallyfrom1989to1995(Hamnett1999). Takingalong-termview,housepricesandthehousingmarkethavebeenhighlycyclical sincethestartofthe1970swhenthefirstwaveofbabyboomershitthehousingmarket. Wehavehadfourmajorbooms(1970–73,1978–79,1985–89,2000–07)andfour corrections,orperiodsofsloworfallingpricesandlowsalevolumes,ofwhichthelasttwo havebeenbyfarthemostsevere.Thefirstdownturninthemid1970s(1974–77)waspartly concealedbytheveryhighlevelsofinflationwhichmeantthatwhilerealhousepricesfell sharply,nominalhousepricesremainedstatic. ThefirstboomendedwhenChancelloroftheExchequerAnthonyBarberraisedthebank rateto11percentinlate1973tochokeofftheboominconsumerspendingandmoney supply.Thishappenedagaininautumn1989whenChancellorNigelLawsonattemptedto chokeofftheboom.Eachtime,thehomeownershipmarketslowedrapidly. Thedownturnswereallrelativelyshort-liveduntilthehousingslumpof1989to1995,which sawsalesvolumesfallfromapeakofjustover2millionayearin1988to1.6millionin1989 andalowof1millionin1993.Negativeequityreachedsome2millionhouseholds,and around500,000householdssawtheirhomesrepossessedduringthe1990s.Thissawsome commentatorssuggestingthatthehousingmarketinBritainwouldneverrecover.But,aswe know,themarketbegantopickupfrom1994onwardsandfrom1995tomid-2007national averagehousepricesrosebyabout230percentfrom£60,000to£200,000.By2007house price-incomeratioshadevenexceededtheirlevelsinthelate1980sandaffordabilityhad becomeamajorproblemonceagain(Wilcox2006). Sincetheearly1970sthepatternisoneofrecurrentboomandbust,withacycleofabout seventoeightyearsonaverage.Atthepeakofeachboomtheaveragehouseprice-income ratiohasrisensharplytoapeakofover4.3inthelate1980sand5.8in2007.The proportionoffirst-timebuyersgenerallyalsofallssharply–from55percentintheearly 1990stoalowof30percentin2003asaffordabilityproblemsbite.Thecyclicalmovement ofrealhousepricescomparedtothelong-termtrendofabout3percentayearisshownin Figure1below. 5 Tomorrow’sCapitalism|TheMadnessofMortgageLenders Figure1.Real houseprices, Base : 2009 Q1 Trend Real House Price £210,000 1975–2008 Trend from 1975 Q1 to present Source:Nationwide £190,000 Trend = c2.9% per annum BuildingSociety £170,000 £150,000 £130,000 £110,000 £90,000 £70,000 £50,000 £30,000 1975 Q1 1977 Q1 1979 Q1 1981 Q1 1983 Q1 1985 Q1 1987 Q1 1989 Q1 1991 Q1 1993 Q1 1995 Q1 1997 Q1 1999 Q1 2001 Q1 2003 Q1 2005 Q1 2007 Q1 2009 Q1 Theforgottenlessonsofthe1990sboomandbust Thecurrenthousingmarketslumpandtheproblemsfacingmortgagelendersfromthe riseinmortgagearrearsandrepossessionsarenotunique.Between1990and1993the fivelargestmortgagelenders,theHalifax,Nationwide,Woolwich,andLeedsBuilding SocietiesandtheAbbeyNational,experiencedadramaticworseningofprovisionsforbad debtsandwrite-offs.In1990theircombinedprovisionsforbaddebtsonresidential propertytotalled£164millionbutby1993thishadrisento£1,278million.Taking1992 and1993togethertheirjointprovisionstotalled£2.38billionandtheirwrite-offsjust over£1billion.Theirprofitsfellbymuchless,largelybecausetheywereabletooffset thelossesagainstmortgageindemnitypolicieswhichgaveprotectiontolendersforthe first25percentoflossesarisingfromloandefaultsandrepossessions.Thecostofthe lossestotheinsurancecompaniesrosefrom£48millionin1990to£1.37billionin1991 (Stephens1996). Governmentintervenedtotemporarilyraisethethresholdforstampdutyfrom£30,000to £250,000foreightmonthsin1992andin1993itdoubledthethreshold.Wesawsimilar changestostampdutythresholdsin2008inanefforttoreducetransactioncostsand stimulatethemarket. So,whatmakesthecurrenthousingmarketslumpsodifferent?Theanswerissimple:the shortageofhousingfinanceandthenearcollapseoftheprivatehousebuildingmarket asaresultofthedryingupofpurchases.NationalHouseBuildingCouncilfigures suggestthatthelevelofnewhousingstartsinthethreemonthstotheendofFebruary
Recommended publications
  • Investor Presentation
    Investor Presentation HY 2020 Our Investment Case 1 2 3 4 Our distinctive The scale and A well-positioned Our operational business model & quality of our development expertise & clear strategy portfolio pipeline customer insight Increasing our focus 22.5m sq ft of Development pipeline Expertise in on mixed use places high quality assets aligned to strategy managing and leasing our assets based on our customer insight Growing London Underpinned by our Provides visibility campuses and resilient balance sheet on future earnings Residential and refining and financial strength Drives incremental Retail value for stakeholders 1 British Land at a glance 1FA, Broadgate £15.4bn Assets under management £11.7bn Of which we own £521m Annualised rent 22.5m sq ft Floor space 97% Occupancy Canada Water Plymouth As at September 2019 2 A diverse, high quality portfolio £11.7bn (BL share) Multi-let Retail (26%) London Campuses (45%) 72% London & South East Solus Retail (5%) Standalone offices (10%) Retail – London & SE (10%) Residential & Canada Water (4%) 3 Our unique London campuses £8.6bn Assets under management £6.4bn Of which we own 78% £205m Annualised rent 6.6m sq ft Floor space 97% Occupancy As at September 2019 4 Canada Water 53 acre mixed use opportunity in Central London 5 Why mixed use? Occupiers Employees want space which is… want space which is… Attractive to skilled Flexible Affordable Well connected Located in vibrant Well connected Safe and promotes Sustainable and employees neighbourhoods wellbeing eco friendly Tech Close to Aligned to
    [Show full text]
  • Time to Touch up the CV? Beeb Launches Search for New Director General
    BUSINESS WITH PERSONALITY PLOUGHING AHEAD 30 YEARS LATER THE WIMBLEDON LOOK LAND ROVER DISCOVERY TO HEAD BACK TO HITS A LANDMARK P24 MERTON HOME P26 TUESDAY 11 FEBRUARY 2020 ISSUE 3,553 CITYAM.COM FREE HACKED OFF US ramps up China TREASURY TO spat with fresh Equifax charges SET OUT CITY BREXIT PLAN EXCLUSIVE Beyond Brexit, it will also consider “But there will be differences, not CATHERINE NEILAN the industry’s future in relation to least because as a global financial cen- worldwide challenges such as emerg- tre the UK needs to keep pace with @CatNeilan ing technologies and climate change. and drive international standards. THE GOVERNMENT will insist on the Javid sets out the government’s Our starting point will be what’s right right to diverge from EU financial plans to retain regulatory autonomy for the UK.” services regulation as part of a post- while seeking a “reliable equivalence He also re-committed to concluding Brexit trade deal with Brussels. process”, on which a “durable rela- “a full range of equivalence assess- Writing exclusively in City A.M. today, tionship” can be built. ments” by June of this year, in order to chancellor Sajid Javid says the “Of course, each side will only give the system sufficient stability City “will no longer be a rule- grant equivalence if it believes ahead of the end of transition. taker” and reveals that the other’s regulations are One senior industry figure told City ministers are working on compatible,” the chancel- A.M. that while a white paper was EMILY NICOLLE Zhiyong, Wang Qian, Xu Ke and Liu Le, a white paper setting lor writes.
    [Show full text]
  • ABBEY NATIONAL TREASURY SERVICES Plc SANTANDER UK Plc
    THIS NOTICE IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT AS TO THE ACTION YOU SHOULD TAKE, YOU ARE RECOMMENDED TO SEEK YOUR OWN FINANCIAL ADVICE IMMEDIATELY FROM YOUR STOCKBROKER, BANK MANAGER, SOLICITOR, ACCOUNTANT OR OTHER INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISER WHO, IF YOU ARE TAKING ADVICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, IS DULY AUTHORISED UNDER THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000. ABBEY NATIONAL TREASURY SERVICES plc SANTANDER UK plc NOTICE to the holders of the outstanding series of notes listed in the Schedule hereto (the Notes) issued under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme of Abbey National Treasury Services plc (as Issuer of Senior Notes) and Santander UK plc (formerly Abbey National plc) (as Issuer of Subordinated Notes and Guarantor of Senior Notes issued by Abbey National Treasury Services plc) Proposed transfer to Santander UK plc of the business of Alliance & Leicester plc under Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the holders of the Notes (the Noteholders) of the proposed transfer (the Transfer) of the business of Alliance & Leicester plc (A&L) to Santander UK plc (Santander UK) (formerly Abbey National plc (Abbey)) and the right of any person who believes that they would be adversely affected by the Transfer to appear at the Court (as defined below) hearing and object to it, as further described below. If the Court approves the Transfer, it is expected to take effect from and including 28 May 2010. Background to the Transfer Abbey became part of the Santander Group in 2004 and, in 2008, A&L and the Bradford & Bingley savings business and branches became part of the Santander Group's operations in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • What's the Best Way to Get in Touch with My Banks?
    INVESTIGATION | CONTACTING BANKS What’s the best way to get in touch with my bank? With more than 2,000 branches closing over the past decade, In part, banks and building societies have been cutting costs as a result of the financial has it become harder to access your bank, or do new contact crisis, or prioritising investment in technology methods compensate for the decline in face-to-face service? to get people banking in other ways. To better understand this shift in banking decade ago, if you wanted to pay in a The rapid rate of branch closure is a cause access, we surveyed 14 of the biggest current cheque or withdraw some money, all for concern for 57% of Which? members, account providers to find out how many A it would take was a short walk to your according to our survey of 1,356 people in branches they’d closed or opened between local high street bank branch. But today, the January 2014. However, with 89% of those we 2003 and 2013. We also asked about their same transaction at your nearest branch surveyed having access to online banking and branch network plans for 2014 and beyond. might require a 20-mile drive. 76% using telephone banking, it’s perhaps no HSBC closed the largest percentage – almost Given that the number of bank branches surprise that 42% believe that branch banking 30% were shut between the start of 2003 and on our high streets has almost halved since is becoming obsolete. But do the alternatives the end of 2013 – 458 branches in areas where the late 1980s, that’s hardly surprising.
    [Show full text]
  • Aldermore Group PLC – Report and Accounts for the 18 Month Period To
    Aldermore Group PLC Report and Accounts for the 18 month period to 30 June 2018 Aldermore Group PLC Report and Accounts 2017/18 Strategic report Contents Corporate Financial governance statements Board of Directors 27 Statement of Directors’ 61 Executive Committee 28 responsibilities Corporate governance structure 30 Independent auditor’s report 62 Directors’ Report 31 Consolidated financial statements 69 Notes to the consolidated 74 financial statements The Company financial statements 120 Notes to the Company 123 financial statements Strategic report Risk management Introduction 1 The Group’s approach to risk 36 Business overview 6 Risk governance and oversight 38 Financial highlights 7 Principal Risks 41 Chairman’s statement 8 Market overview 10 Our business model 12 Chief Executive Officer’s review 14 Chief Financial Officer’s review 16 Business Finance 19 Retail Finance 21 Central Functions 23 Appendix Corporate responsibility 24 Glossary 127 Follow us @AldermoreBank AldermoreBank company/aldermore-bank-plc AldermoreBank For more information on our business visit www.aldermore.co.uk Aldermore Group PLC Report and Accounts 2017/18 1 We are Aldermore Strategic report Strategic Corporate governance Risk management Risk Aldermore helps customers seek We’re not like traditional high- and seize opportunities in their street banks. We go beyond their Financial statements Financial professional and personal lives. one-size fits all approach by understanding our customers’ We provide business financing to circumstances and by making sure support the growth of UK small we offer a high quality service. and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and we support investors Following a cash offer of 313 pence and home-buyers with per ordinary share for the Group Appendix mortgage finance on property.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Risk Management Financial Statements Appendices
    39 Strategic report Corporate governance Risk management Financial statements Appendices Corporate governance Chairman’s introduction 40 Board of Directors 42 Executive Committee 44 Corporate governance structure 45 The Board - roles and processes 46 Relations with shareholders 58 Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee Report 60 Audit Committee Report 62 Risk Committee Report 70 Remuneration Report 74 Directors' Report 100 40 Aldermore Group PLC Annual Report and Accounts 2016 Corporate governance Chairman’s introduction 2016 has been a year of consolidation and evolution as we have strived to build on a strong governance framework that we established in preparation for our listing.” Danuta Gray, Interim Chairman UK Corporate Governance Code 2014 (“the Code”) – statement of compliance The Board is committed to the highest standards of corporate governance and confirms that, during the year under review, the Group has complied with the requirements of the Code, which sets out principles relating to the good governance of companies. Following the resignation of Glyn Jones as Chairman with effect from 6 February 2017, and the subsequent appointment of Danuta Gray as Interim Chairman, Danuta Gray is currently not discharging her role as Senior Independent Director. These responsibilities will be resumed on appointment of a new Chairman. The Code is available at www.frc.org.uk This corporate governance report describes how the Board has applied the principles of the Code and provides a clear and comprehensive description of the Group’s governance arrangements. 41 Strategic report Corporate governance Risk management Financial statements Appendices Dear Shareholder Director in October 2016 subsequent brand. During the year, the Executive As your Interim Chairman, I am to him resigning from AnaCap.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 an Evolutionary Perspective on the British Banking Crisis Abstract
    An Evolutionary Perspective on the British Banking Crisis Abstract Developing an evolutionary perspective towards the changing anatomy of the banking sector reveals the enduring tensions and contradictions between spatial centralisation and the possibilities for decentralisation before, during and after the British banking crisis. The shift from banking boom to crisis in 2007 is conceptualised as a significant and on-going moment in the long-term evolution of the historical institutional-spatial dominance of London over other city-regions in Britain. The analysis demonstrates the importance of the institutional and geographical legacies of the British national political economy and variegation of capitalism established in the later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in shaping contemporary geographical outcomes. Regulatory changes combined with financial innovation in the latter years of the twentieth century to create an opportunity for English regional and Scottish banks excluded from previous institutional-spatial centralisation to expand excessively and consequently several failed in the banking crisis. The paper considers the future trajectory of institutional-spatial centralisation in the banking sector amidst the continued spatial restructuring of the banking crisis, involving a re-drawing of organisational boundaries, overlapping institutional and technological changes and unprecedented uncertainty about the impact of Brexit on Britain’s wider political and economic landscape. Banking crisis evolutionary geographical political
    [Show full text]
  • PLACES PEOPLE PREFER Annual Report and Accounts 2020
    PLACES PEOPLE PREFER Annual Report and Accounts 2020 British Land plc Annual Report and Accounts 2020 Inside Key figures Strategic Report Underlying EPS IFRS loss after tax At a glance 2 Chairman’s statement 4 32.7p £(1,114)m Our purpose 6 2019: 34.9p 2019: £(320)m Case study: 1 Triton Square 8 Chief Executive’s review 10 Investment case 13 EPRA NAV per share Underlying Profit Business model 14 774p £306m Places 2019: 905p 2019: £340m Our portfolio 16 Strategic focus 22 Total accounting return IFRS net assets Strategic performance and KPIs 24 Development pipeline 26 (11.0)% £7,147m 2019: (3.3)% 2019: £8,689m People Customer and community stories 30 Stakeholder engagement and s172 32 IFRS EPS Dividend per share People and culture 34 (110.0)p 15.97p Employee-led networks 36 Sustainability 38 2019: (30.0)p 2019: 31.00p Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) 42 Senior unsecured Carbon intensity reduction GHG emissions 46 credit rating versus 2009 Non-financial reporting disclosure 47 A 73% Prefer 2019: A 2019: 64% Market insights 54 Performance review 56 Customer Bright Lights skills and Financial review 68 satisfaction employment programme Financial policies and principles 75 Managing risk 78 8.3 504 Principal risks 82 2019: 8.2/10 people supported with work Viability statement 88 2019: 389 Corporate Governance Report Chairman’s introduction 90 Board of Directors 92 Stakeholder engagement statement 96 Presentation of financial information Corporate Governance Report 98 The Group financial statements are prepared under IFRS where the Report of the Nomination Committee 104 Group’s interests in joint ventures and funds are shown as a single line item on the income statement and balance sheet and all subsidiaries are Report of the Audit Committee 108 consolidated at 100%.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationwide Building Society
    PROSPECTUS dated 11 September 2017 THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in doubt as to the action you should take in connection with this document or the proposals contained in it, you are recommended to seek your own personal financial advice immediately from your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, if you are taking advice in the United Kingdom, or from another appropriately authorised independent financial adviser if you are taking advice in a jurisdiction outside the United Kingdom. This document comprises a prospectus (the Prospectus) relating to Nationwide Building Society (the Society) and to the Society and its consolidated subsidiaries (Nationwide or the Group) prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) made under section 73A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (the FSMA). The Prospectus will be made available to the public in accordance with the Prospectus Rules. Capitalised terms used in this Prospectus which are not otherwise defined have the meanings given to them in “Part XXII: Definitions”. NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY (incorporated in England and Wales under the UK Building Societies Act 1986, as amended, and regulated by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority with FCA Mutuals Public Register Number 355B) Issue of 5,000,000 Core Capital Deferred Shares of £1 each at an Issue Price of £159.00 per Core Capital Deferred Share (the Further CCDS) and admission of the Further CCDS to the Official List and to trading on the London Stock Exchange such Further CCDS to be consolidated and form a single series immediately upon issue with the 5,500,000 CCDS issued by the Society on 6 December 2013 (the Existing CCDS and, together with the Further CCDS, the CCDS) Joint Bookrunners Barclays BofA Merrill Lynch Citigroup J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • BYY Overview
    Best Year Yet closes the Performance Gap The Best Year Yet Program is a year long planning and execution “The pragmatic process that will close the Gap between your strategy and your approach and the performance. discipline that comes with the monthly follow up sessions has really helped my team to achieve the results we needed” Marketing Manager, Unilever “Bottom line results are up 60% over the past two years!” CEO, Unum Limited Dorking “Our team moved from last in the country to first” David McAvoy, Regional Director, NatWest Retail Bank Harvard Business Review , Turning Strategy into Great Performance “Best Year Yet is a focused system The program will facilitate your team in deciding what is important, that changes set objectives that are aligned around top initiatives, hold them behavior, culture accountable, and build in discipline to deliver the results that are and performance time after time” needed to reach higher levels of performance. Lawrence Churchill, Former CEO, Zurich Organisations of all sizes The process is perfect for: Financial Services • Senior leadership teams • Breakthrough sales results References • Project teams • Improving productivity Abbott, Proctor & Gamble, Zurich, • Organisations seeking to • Strategic planning & implementation Microsoft, ING, Swiss cascade accountability • Organisational transformation Life, American Express, • Derailed teams • Employee satisfaction & development HSBC, KPN, Bank of • Non performing teams • Morale, motivation, alignment & focus Ireland, IBM, Heineken, Unilever, Nestle, Coca-Cola, Halifax, Lloyd’s bank www.bestyearyet.com How is Best Year Yet structured? There are three basic components to the BYY program. Best Year Yet for management teams or departments, Best Year Yet for individuals, and the Follow-up Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in a 1% World
    LivingLiving inin aa 1%1% WorldWorld FredFred GoodwinGoodwin GroupGroup ChiefChief ExecutiveExecutive Slide 2 Living in a 1% World 1% World Stakeholder pensions Sandler regulated products Slide 3 Living in a 1% World Implications for RBS Lower margins on long term savings Less than 1% of RBS income from long term savings Higher volumes of distribution of long term savings Simpler products, processes better for bank distribution Slide 4 Living in a 1% World What are the required characteristics for growth? Slide 5 Required Characteristics for Growth Organic growth – Large distribution capacity – Multiple brands – Low market shares – Effective sales processes – Able to grow new businesses – Diversity of income Acquisitions – Able to make good acquisitions – Good at integration of acquisitions Efficiency – Able to improve efficiency Slide 6 Large Distribution Capacity Distribution Channels UK Ranking Branches #1 Supermarkets #1 Telephone #1 = Internet #? (large) ATMs #1 Relationship Managers #1 Source: Company Accounts, CACI and Link Slide 7 Multiple Brands Multi-Brand, Multiple Channel Strategy Slide 8 Multiple Brands Multi-Brand, Multiple Channel Strategy Appeals to different customer groups Allows different product variants, pricing Gives flexibility for future Allows management autonomy Slide 9 Low Market Shares UK Market Shares Total RBS Current accounts 21% Savings accounts 8% Personal loans 10% Mortgages 5% Credit cards 17% Life insurance 2% Motor insurance 16%* Home insurance 13%* Small business relationships 30%
    [Show full text]
  • Geographies of Corporate Philanthropy: the Northern Rock Foundation
    Marshall JN, Dawley S, Pike A, Pollard JS. Geographies of Corporate Philanthropy: The Northern Rock Foundation. Environment and Planning A 2017 Copyright: This is the authors’ accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Sage Publications, 2017 DOI link to article: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17746405 Date deposited: 19/12/2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Geographies of Corporate Philanthropy: The Northern Rock Foundation by Neill Marshall, Stuart Dawley, Andy Pike, and Jane Pollard [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Forthcoming in Environment and Planning A http://journals.sagepub.com/home/epn Please note: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite this paper. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, 1 Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU. Geographies of Corporate Philanthropy: The Northern Rock Foundation Abstract The paper contributes to literature on the geographies of corporate philanthropy through a case study of the origins, growth and decline of the Northern Rock bank’s charitable foundation. Analysis reveals the complex, geographically-embedded nature of philanthropic motivations and impacts. It demonstrates that investment in home and community by philanthropists was part of a regionally- inscribed business-model of excessive risk taking that brought them considerable personal financial rewards.
    [Show full text]