Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035 Cape Cod 2012 Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035 Endorsed August 22, 2011 Cape Cod 2012 Regional Transportation Plan 2012-2035 Endorsed August 22, 2011 Prepared by: CAPE COD COMMISSION Transportation Staff on behalf of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization Massachusetts Department of Transportation Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Cape Cod Commission Barnstable County Town of Barnstable Towns of Bourne, Sandwich, Falmouth, and Mashpee Towns of Yarmouth, Dennis, Harwich, Brewster, and Chatham Towns of Orleans, Eastham, Wellfleet, Truro, and Provincetown Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in cooperation with: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration This report was funded in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). The views and opinions of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the USDOT Table of Contents Chapter 1: Goals & Objectives Chapter 2: The Transportation System 2.1 – Land Use and the Environment 2.2 – Road Transportation 2.3 – Bus Transportation 2.4 – Rail Transportation 2.5 – Water Transportation 2.6 – Air Transportation 2.7 – Canal Area Transportation 2.8 – Sub-Regions Chapter 3: Safety Chapter 4: Security Chapter 5: Bicycle & Pedestrian Issues Chapter 6: Congestion Management Chapter 7: Analysis of Alternatives Chapter 8: Recommendations and Financial Plan Appendices: Air Quality Conformity Public Comments on Draft RTP Reproductions of this document may be in black-and-white. Full-color versions are available at the Cape Cod Commission’s website: www.capecodcommission.org 2012 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Chapter 1: Goals and Objectives Endorsed August 22, 2011 Chapter 1: Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Transportation Planning Process ...................................................... 3 1.2 Public Participation Process ............................................................. 6 1.2.1 Meetings .................................................................................. 6 1.2.2 Surveys and Comment Forms ..................................................... 7 1.2.3 Inclusion of Environmental, Human Service, and Cultural Resource Organizations ....................................................................... 11 1.3 Livability Ⓛ ................................................................................. 11 1.4 Goals of the 2012 Plan ................................................................. 13 1.4.1 Safety and Security ................................................................. 13 1.4.2 Congestion Relief .................................................................... 15 1.4.3 Multimodal Accessibility Ⓛ ....................................................... 17 1.4.4 System Maintenance ............................................................... 18 1.4.5 Environmental Protection ......................................................... 19 1.4.6 Community Orientation Ⓛ ....................................................... 20 1.4.7 Equitability ............................................................................. 22 1.4.8 Cooperation among Stakeholders ............................................. 22 1.5 Changes since the 2007 Plan ......................................................... 24 1.5.1 Transportation Projects Since the 2007 Plan .............................. 24 1.6 Comparing Goals with Other Plans ................................................. 26 1.6.1 Consistency with Federal Transportation Planning Goals ............. 26 1.6.2 Consistency with Commonwealth Transportation Planning Goals . 27 1.6.3 Comparison with Cape Cod Regional Planning Goals................... 28 1.7 Background and Demographic Information ..................................... 29 1.7.1 Demographics ......................................................................... 29 1.7.2 Economics .............................................................................. 35 1.7.3 Land Use ................................................................................ 43 1.7.4 Environmental Justice Ⓛ ......................................................... 48 1.8 Conclusion ................................................................................... 49 Chapter 1: List of Figures Figure 1 - Barnstable County/Cape Cod Overview Map ..................................... 2 Figure 2 - Transportation Planning Process Flowchart ...................................... 5 Figure 3 - Barnstable County Population Growth 2000-2009 ........................... 30 Figure 4 - Percent of Barnstable County and Massachusetts population Age 65+ .......................................................................................................... 33 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan | August 2011 Chapter 1: Goals & Objectives Figure 5 - Employment in Barnstable County - Average Month, 1980-2002 ...... 37 Figure 6 - Goods vs. Service Producing Industries in Cape Cod and Mass. ........ 39 Figure 7 - Work Destinations of Barnstable Residents..................................... 40 Figure 8 - Work Origins to Barnstable County ................................................ 41 Figure 9 - Net Difference of Worker Destinations-Origins ................................ 42 Figure 10 - Barnstable County Housing Unit Estimates 2000 - 2008 ................. 44 Figure 11 - Cape Cod Zoning and Land Use Patterns ...................................... 45 Figure 12 - Nauset Bay and the Cape Cod National Seashore in Eastham ......... 46 Figure 13 - Map of Environmental Justice Populations on Cape Cod ................. 48 Chapter 1: List of Tables Table 1 - RTP Local Traffic Delay Areas (from public comment form) .............. 10 Table 2 - RTP Local Safety Problem Areas (from public comment form) ........... 11 Table 3 - TIP Projects Constructed, Implemented, Advertised, or Underway .... 25 Table 4 - Goals Compared: Federal vs. RTP ................................................... 27 Table 5 - Goals Compared: Massachusetts Transportation Plan vs. RTP ........... 28 Table 6 - Goals Compared: Regional Policy Plan vs. RTP ................................ 29 Table 7 - A Comparison of Cape Cod Towns’ 2000-2008 Population Change .... 31 Table 8 - Number of Households and Household Size for Cape Cod and Towns 32 Table 9 - State Ranking by Town: Percent of Cape Residents age 65+ ............ 33 Table 10 - Residents Aged 12-21 on Cape Cod, by Town ................................ 34 Table 11 - Median Household Income in Barnstable County ............................ 36 Table 12 - Residents Living and Working within Cape Cod and Towns, 2000 .... 38 Table 13 - Barnstable County Employment by Major Industry Sector, 2002 ...... 40 Table 14 - Barnstable County Journeys to Work ............................................ 43 Chapter 1: Goals & Objectives Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan | August 2011 1. Introduction This 2012 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a fiscally constrained set of transportation projects, programs, “smart” solutions, and transportation studies for the 25 years from 2011 to 2035. The planning area of the RTP includes all major (and many minor) modes of travel throughout all 15 communities of Barnstable County and is undertaken by the Cape Cod Commission transportation staff on behalf of the Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). This chapter includes background information on the roles and responsibilities of participating agencies, a synopsis of the public participation process, and a section on the goals and objectives of the current plan. Changes and progress since the 2007 plan are also discussed in this chapter as well as an outline of the demographic characteristics of Barnstable County. The remaining chapters of this Plan include: An examination of the Cape’s existing transportation system and future trends and forecasts A discussion of safety & security transportation issues (e.g., crash rates, hurricane evacuation etc.) An analysis of congestion management issues (e.g., travel times and delays) A review of existing and needed bicycle facilities Listings of alternatives including evaluation based on RTP conformity criteria Integration of recent transportation studies A set of recommended projects, programs, “smart” solutions, and transportation studies that a fiscally constrained based on estimated available funding Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan | August 2011 Chapter 1: Goals & Objectives Page 1 FIGURE 1 - BARNSTABLE COUNTY/CAPE COD OVERVIEW MAP The map shown above identifies the fifteen Cape Cod communities and major highways such as Routes 6, 28, and 6A. Chapter 1: Goals & Objectives Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan | August 2011 Page 2 1.1 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for reviewing, guiding, and endorsing the RTP. Currently, the official position/agency of each membership is as follows: Secretary, Massachusetts Department of Transportation Administrator, Massachusetts Department of Transportation/Highway Division Chair/Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority Chair/Cape Cod Commission Commissioner/Barnstable County Council President/Town
Recommended publications
  • 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida
    Investment Element of the 2010 Florida Rail System Plan 2.0 Current Freight Rail System and Services in Florida 2.1 Overview The Florida rail system is comprised of 2,786 miles of mainline track, which are owned by 15 operating line-haul railroads and terminal or switching companies, as well as 81 miles owned by the State of Florida. Florida’s rail system includes 2 Class I Railroads (CSX Transportation and Norfolk Southern Corporation), 1 Class II (Florida East Coast Railway), 11 Class III (Alabama and Gulf Coast Railway AN Railway, Bay Line Railroad, First Coast Railroad, Florida West Coast Railroad, Florida Central Railroad, Florida Midland Railroad, Florida Northern Railroad, Georgia and Florida Railway, Seminole Gulf Railway, and South Central Florida Express) and 1 railroad specializing in switching and terminals (Talleyrand Terminal).9 The largest operator in the State is CSX Transportation, which owns more than 53 percent of the statewide track mileage. In 2008, Florida’s railroads carried nearly 1.6 million carloads – 19 percent less than in 2006 – and approximately 83 million tons of freight, representing a 25 million ton (23 percent) decrease from 2006.10 During that year, railroads handled freight equivalent to roughly 5.0 million heavy trucks.11 Nonetheless, railroads continue to support thousands of jobs throughout the State and assist Florida’s industries to remain competitive with international and domestic markets for fertilizer, construction rock, consumer goods, paper products, processed 9 U.S. Class I Railroads are line-haul freight railroads with 2007 operating revenue in excess of $359.6 million (2006 operating revenues exceeding $346.7 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of 2017 Massachusetts Piping Plover Census Data
    SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS Bill Byrne, MassWildlife SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS ABSTRACT This report summarizes data on abundance, distribution, and reproductive success of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) in Massachusetts during the 2017 breeding season. Observers reported breeding pairs of Piping Plovers present at 147 sites; 180 additional sites were surveyed at least once, but no breeding pairs were detected at them. The population increased 1.4% relative to 2016. The Index Count (statewide census conducted 1-9 June) was 633 pairs, and the Adjusted Total Count (estimated total number of breeding pairs statewide for the entire 2017 breeding season) was 650.5 pairs. A total of 688 chicks were reported fledged in 2017, for an overall productivity of 1.07 fledglings per pair, based on data from 98.4% of pairs. Prepared by: Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife 2 SUMMARY OF THE 2017 MASSACHUSETTS PIPING PLOVER CENSUS INTRODUCTION Piping Plovers are small, sand-colored shorebirds that nest on sandy beaches and dunes along the Atlantic Coast from North Carolina to Newfoundland. The U.S. Atlantic Coast population of Piping Plovers has been federally listed as Threatened, pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act, since 1986. The species is also listed as Threatened by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife pursuant to Massachusetts’ Endangered Species Act. Population monitoring is an integral part of recovery efforts for Atlantic Coast Piping Plovers (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1996, Hecht and Melvin 2009a, b). It allows wildlife managers to identify limiting factors, assess effects of management actions and regulatory protection, and track progress toward recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • November 6, 2014 for Those of You Who Were Able to Join Us at Our
    Dear All: November 6, 2014 For those of you who were able to join us at our WB&A Members Only Semi‐Annual General Membership/Swap Meet it was good to see you and we are glad you were able to join us. Please join us in welcoming and congratulating the winners of the 2015‐16 election: David Eadie (BoD & Membership); Bob Goodrich (BoD); Bill Moss (BoD) and Dan Danielson (Eastern Rep). I extend the entire BoD thanks and welcoming to them for the 2015‐16 Term. At our meeting we took a few minutes to say “thank you” to a couple who have done so much for the train hobby, the TCA and the WB&A, namely, Mary and Pete Jackson. Your BoD presented them with a plaque in honor of their work on the BoD over the years and for their years of work running Kids Korner at York and for the countless other ways they have assisted. Mary and Pete moved to Delaware about 2 years ago and have continued to be active in all that they had committed themselves to, but it’s time for them to take time to play trains and let others step up to take on the roles they had. So to Mary and Pete we say thank you for your years of service. As a reminder, the eblasts and attachments will be placed on the WB&A website under the “About” tab for your viewing/sharing pleasure http://www.wbachapter.org/2014%20E‐ Blast%20Page.htm The attachments are contained in the one PDF attached to this email in an effort to streamline the sending of this email and to ensure the attachments are able to be received.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2016 Volume 36 Number 4
    APRIL 25, 2016 ■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 36 ■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 4 E8 #224 with the Toronto-Chicago train at Windsor, Ontario. Since discontinued. Amtrak #649, the last SDP40F built—Amtrak’s first brand-new power. Shown in Florida. E8 #4316, a one-of-a-kind paint job. Quickly-painted ex-PC unit for Amtrak’s inaugural May 1, 1971. Shown at Detroit’s station. The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski “Amtrak News”……………………………. .. Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page and photographer…………………… Joe Dumas Guest Contributors ……………………………… Savery Moore, Ron Clough …………... Rick Sutton The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2015 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 36 ■■■■■ NUMBER 4 ■■■■■ APRIL 2016 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner.......……….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests .................….
    [Show full text]
  • Look at All of the Sea Captains That Lived on Pleasant Street! Hyannis
    Hyannis N Transportation Center 1 On July 8, 1854, The You are here! Cape Cod Railroad Company reached the town of Hyannis. It reached Provincetown in July 1873, and was known, by then, as the Old Colony Railroad. This postcard shows the original S railroad depot in Hyannis. 1 MAIN STREET 2 MAIN STREET SCHOOL STREET 3 The Cash Block 3 building was built by Captain 5 Built before 1770, Alexander Baxter, often known as by Captain Allen Hallet, this is the “ the Father of Hyannis”, for his 4 second oldest residence existing in Hyannis, commitment to developing the village still on it’s original foundation and location. in the early 19th century. 5 2 In 1874, PLEASANT STREET President Ulysses S. Grant arrived in Hyannis on the River Queen as part 6 School Street Along of the inauguration of the railroad this picturesque street you will see extension to Provincetown. With several Greek Revival Cottages origi- much fanfare, he spoke to crowds nally built from 1825-1924. If you have at this corner and at each stop on 8 a little extra time, saunter here. his way to Provincetown on the Old 7 Colony Railroad! OLD COLO NY ROAD NY COLO OLD 10 9 11 12 13 6 Built in 1852, 14 Captain Allen Crowell Homestead, 20 in 1666, this area of remains a fine original example of the Greek Revival land was granted to the first settler style of architecture. Captain Crowell (1821-1891) SOUTH STREET of Hyannis, Nicholas Davis, by the was well known for sailing all of the Seven Seas! 15 leader of the Mattakeese Indians, Yanno, Visit the Barn/Stable to see the PLEASANT STREET also called Iyannough.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzards Bay Commuter Rail Progresses — Slowly New CTPS Study May Delay Town Meeting Vote; 2014 Capeflyer Ridership, Revenue Down
    Dear All: October 10, 2014 Please note: There will be no eblast next week as we ALL will be at York (I hope). It seems every time I walk into a store there is a new theme being displayed, it’s gone from the Fourth of July to Christmas, not sure where the time has gone! We hope you will visit the WB&A table at York (by the registration counter). The hours will be posted on the table so that you can stop by and say hello, pay your 2015 dues (then have a chance at the $100 drawing), take a chance on the drawing (see below) and let us know how we’re doing. The attached flyer reminds us that we have warriors coming home and many (too many) still abroad who defend and protect the U.S.A. No matter what your political views may be, I hope you can take the time to partake in this event. As a reminder, the eblasts and attachments will be placed on the WB&A website under the “About” tab for your viewing/sharing pleasure http://www.wbachapter.org/index.html. The attachments are contained in the one PDF attached to this email in an effort to streamline the sending of this email and to ensure the attachments are able to be received. TRAIN STORIES BY CLEM CLEMENT I hope you have been enjoying Clem’s York stories, attached is another story from Clem regarding STOMPER. Enjoy! Also, as those of us who know Clem and for those of who don’t, I KNOW you have heard of the mighty STOMPER – in Clem’s words: From time to time, the truthful stories about STOMPER’s exploits come to life from his hideout on goiunkland 34.1(Located in the shadows of history, just past the time/speed location of Eve’s first words...).
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Cod5 0 5 D
    OND P Y D N S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S A S S S S S L S P TARKILN HILL O LINCOLN HILL E C G T G ELLIS POND A i S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S C S S S S Sb S S S S G L b ROBBINS BOG s E B I S r t P o N W o O o n N k NYE BOG Diamondback G y D Þ S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S COWEN CORNER R ! R u e W W S n , d B W "! A W H Þ terrapin W r s D h S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S O S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S ! S S S S S S S S S S l A N WAREHAM CENTER o e O R , o 5 y k B M P S , "! "! r G E "! Year-round o D DEP Environmental Sensitivity Map P S N ok CAMP N PO S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S es H S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SAR S S S S S S S S S S S S S S O t W SNIPATUIT W ED L B O C 5 ra E n P "! LITTLE c ROGERS BOG h O S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S Si N S S S S S S S S S S S S S A S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S BSUTTESRMILKS S p D American lobster G pi A UNION ca W BAY W n DaggerblAaMde grass shrimp POND RI R R VE Þ 4 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S i S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S )S S S S S S v + ! "! m er "! SAND la W W ÞÞ WAREHAM DICKS POND Þ POND Alewife c Þ S ! ¡[ ! G ! d S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S h W S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 4 S Sr S S S S S S S S ! i BUTTERMILK e _ S b Þ "! a NOAA Sensitive Habitat and Biological Resources q r b "! m ! h u s M ( BANGS BOG a a B BAY n m a Alewife g OAKDALE r t EAST WAREHAM B S S S S S S S S S S S S S
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Report
    Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Report Medfield December 11, 2016 Version 1.0 The Medfield Bay Colony Rail Trail Study Committee: Al Brenton (retired), Christian Donner, George Hinkley, Erik Holm, Bob Horgan, Susan Lynch (retired), Jeremy Marsette (retired), Graham Plonski 1 | P a g e CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Why should Medfield move ahead?................................................................................................... 5 Investment .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Timeline ............................................................................................................................. 5 1 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 History .................................................................................................................................... 6 2 FEASIBILITY STUDIES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 236/Thursday, December 10, 2009
    Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Notices 65589 themselves should write to the Director, extending 14.20 miles between milepost revoke will not automatically stay the Office of Information Programs and QNF 0.00 (at Myricks) and milepost transaction. Petitions for stay must be Services (address above). QNF 14.2 (at Fall River, filed no later than December 17, 1009 (at Massachusetts—Rhode Island state least 7 days before the exemption RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: line); (5) the Framingham to Worcester becomes effective). These records contain information segment of the Boston Main Line (the An original and 10 copies of all obtained primarily from the individual BML-West), extending approximately pleadings, referring to STB Finance who is the subject of these records. 22.92 miles between milepost QB 21.38 Docket No. 35312, must be filed with SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS (at Framingham) and milepost QB 44.30 the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E OF THE PRIVACY ACT: (at Worcester); and (6) the track assets, Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423– None. but not the underlying real estate, 0001. In addition, a copy of each constituting the 9.71-mile rail line pleading must be served on Keith G. [FR Doc. E9–29451 Filed 12–9–09; 8:45 am] between milepost QB 1.12 (at CP Cove) O’Brien, Baker & Miller, PLLC, 2401 BILLING CODE 4710–24–P and milepost QB 10.83 (at Newton/ Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 300, Riverside) (the BML-East). These Washington, DC 20037. properties, which include Board decisions and notices are DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION approximately 71.28 miles of rail line, available on our Web site at: will be referred to collectively as ‘‘the http://www.stb.dot.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • SEP 1 4 2000 Cape Cod Central Railroad, Inc
    B.C.D. 00-35 EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION SEP 1 4 2000 Cape Cod Central Railroad, Inc. (CCCR) This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of the Cape Cod Central Railroad, Inc. (CCCR) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 el sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 el sea-) (RUIA). Mr. John Kennedy, President of CCCR, provided information regarding the railroad. CCCR runs excursion trains on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The train operates solely within Massachusetts and uses 23 miles of track which begins in Hyannis and ends in Bourne. The operation began May 28, 1999 and is seasonal, with the number of employees ranging from five employees in the winter months to as many as twelve part-time seasonal employees during the height of the season. CCCR does not own, control, or lease any track. The track used by CCCR is owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation & Construction, which leases the tracks to Bay Colony Railroad Corporation (BA 3112). CCCR does not interchange with any other railroad. According to Mr. Kennedy, CCCR’s operation is smaller, but similar in service to the former railroads that operated the same tourist service over the past twenty years, identified as the former Cape Cod & Hyannis Scenic Railroad and the former Cape Cod Railroad. Neither of these former railroads paid into the railroad retirement system for the operation of excursion service.1 Section 1(a)(1) of the RRA (45 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Public Document No. 12 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Report of the Attorney General for Fiscal Year 2004 July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004 PUBLICATION OF THIS DOCUMENT APPROVED BY ELLEN M. BICKELMAN, STATE PURCHASING AGENT. Publication Number CR1097-06/05-4.50−Docuprint Express THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE A SHBURTON PLACE THOMAS F. REILLY ATTORNEY GENERAL BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108-1698 In accordance with the provisions of Section 11 of Chapter 12 of the Massachusetts General Laws, I hereby submit the Annual Report for the Office of the Attorney General. This Annual Report covers the period from July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004. Respectfully submitted, Thomas F. Reilly Attorney General TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL APPOINTMENTS ................................. i EXECUTIVE BUREAU ......................................................................................... 1 General Counsel’s Office ................................................................................... 2 Human Resource Management Office ............................................................... 4 External Affairs Office ....................................................................................... 6 Information Technology Division ...................................................................... 7 Budget Office ................................................................................................... 8 Operations Division .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bouchard #65 Oil Spill, January 1977
    .. MESA Special Report The Bouchard #65 Oil Spill, January 1977 April 1978 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental Research Laboratories ... ·, ~,f-~,; MESA Special Report The Bouchard #65 Oil Spill, January 1977 Benjamin Baxter - Paul C. Deslauriers Barbara J. Morson Marine Ecosystems Analysis Program Boulder, Colorado i/- £~'/Z /. -/-I 3o3 April 1978 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Richard Frank, Administrator Environmental Research Laboratories Wilmot Hess, Director Prepared by Marine Ecosystems Analysis Program Boulder, Colorado Science Applications, Inc. 2760 29th Street Boulder, Colorado Under Contract No.: NOAA 03-7-022-35105 ; . TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . i PREFACE . ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iii GLOSSARY ••.. i V 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background. • . • . .•• 1 1.2 Environmental Setting •.• 4 1.3 Chronology of Barge Grounding 9 2. TECHNICAL APPROACH ... 12 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . 23 3.1 Chemical Processes . 23 3.1.1 Chemical Characteristics of Bouchard #65 Cargo ... 23 3.1.2 Weathering of Bouchard #65 Cargo ...•...... 24 3.2 Physical Processes ..•............. 28 3.2.1 Distribution of Spilled Oil, 28 January - 21 February . • . 28 3.2.2 Oil/Ice Interactions .......... 34 3.2.2.1 Interactions of oil with major ice formations ............ 34 3.2.2.2 Small scale interactions of oil with ice and snow ............ 41 3.2.2.3 Incorporation of oil in water column and sediments . 45 3.2.3 Mass Balance . 53 3.3 Biological Processes . 58 3.4 Cleanup Procedures •..•• . 61 4. CONCLUSIONS ......•. ~ . 67 4.1 Su11111ation of Results • . • . • • •.•. 67 4.2 Comparison of Buzzards Bay Spill Conditions with Those of the Coastal Regions of Alaska 69 5.
    [Show full text]