DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom of Expression and Countering Hate Speech

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom of Expression and Countering Hate Speech Handbook on Techniques of Judicial Interaction in the Application of the EU Charter FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND COUNTERING HATE SPEECH IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE ‘E-LEARNING NATIONAL ACTIVE CHARTER TRAINING (E-NACT)’ PROJECT FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & CITIZENSHIP PROGRAMME Researcher responsible for the handbook: Dr. Federica Casarosa With the collaboration of Dr. Madalina Moraru 1 NATIONAL EXPERTS AND COLLABORATORS The e-NACT team would like to thank the following experts and collaborators who contributed to the selection of the national and European case law on which this handbook is built. Fabrizia Bemer Andrea Bindi Marta Carmo Bogdan Cristea Valeria De Risi Evelyne Esterzon Sigita Fomičiova Eric Joos Meeli Kaur Gehard Kuras Nefeli-Zoi Lappa Hans Peter Lehofer Elissavet Margariti Martina Maršić Krasimira Milachova Attila Mráz Ieva Navickaitė-Sakalauskienė Evangelia Psychogiopoulou Jan Stiavnicky 2 Contents Part I – Analysis of the legal area ........................................................................................................ 6 1. The basics: what is freedom of expression? ...................................................................................... 6 1.1. Concept and features ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Legal provisions at the European level ...................................................................................... 8 The European Union .......................................................................................................................... 8 The European Convention on Human Rights .................................................................................. 10 The national level............................................................................................................................. 11 1.3. Limitations ............................................................................................................................... 12 The European Union ........................................................................................................................ 12 The European Convention on Human Rights .................................................................................. 13 The national level............................................................................................................................. 14 2. Hate speech ...................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1. The EU legal framework .......................................................................................................... 16 2.2. ECtHR jurisprudence ............................................................................................................... 21 The distinction between hate speech and other concepts .................................................................... 23 Hate speech and hate crime ............................................................................................................. 23 Hate speech and discrimination ....................................................................................................... 23 Hate speech and defamation ............................................................................................................ 23 3. Main legal and judicial bodies ......................................................................................................... 24 4. The specificities of the use of the Charter of Fundamental rights at the European and national levels ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Media freedom ............................................................................................................................... 26 4.2. Defamation and libel .................................................................................................................... 27 4.3. Conflicts between freedom of expression and data protection ..................................................... 31 4.4. Conflicts between freedom of expression and intellectual property ............................................. 34 Part II – Selected cases ...................................................................................................................... 39 Methodological remarks .......................................................................................................................... 39 Selected sets of cases ............................................................................................................................... 40 Casesheet no. 1 – CJEU, Mesopotamia Broadcast A/S METV (C-244/10) and Roj TV A/S (C- 245/10) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland............................................................................................... 42 Casesheet no. 2 – CJEU, Baltic Media Alliance Ltd v Lietuvos radijo ir televizijos komisija, Case C- 622/17, pending case .......................................................................................................................... 46 Casesheet no. 3 – CJEU, Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, C-18/18, pending case ........................ 49 Casesheet no. 4 – Italy, First instance court Milan, decision 13716/15, 17 December 2015 ............. 53 Casesheet no. 5 – Belgium, Constitutional Court, no. 31/2018, March, 15th 2018 ........................... 55 Casesheet no. 6 – Spain, Constitutional Court, no. 177/2015, 22 July 2015 ...................................... 57 3 Casesheet no. 7 – Portugal, Supreme Court of Justice, 48/12.2YREVR.S1, 5 June 2012 .................. 60 Casesheet no. 8 – Greece, Council of State, Case 1901/2014 (Supreme Administrative Court) ........ 63 Casesheet no. 9 – Slovakia, Constitutional Court II. ÚS 152/08, 15 December 2009 ....................... 67 Casesheet no. 10 – Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 359/2014 of 28 January 2014 ....................................................................................................................................... 70 Casesheet no. 11 – Italy, Tribunal of Rovereto, 19 November 2015 .................................................. 73 Casesheet no. 12 – Romania, High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 3216/2014, 19 November 2014 .................................................................................................................................. 75 Casesheet no. 13 – CJEU, Tietosuojavaltuutettu v Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy, Case C-73/07. ...................................................................................................................................... 79 Casesheet no. 14 – CJEU, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González, Case C‑131/12 ............................................................. 84 Part III - Hypotheticals ...................................................................................................................... 90 Hypothetical no. 1 – The conflict between freedom of expression and data protection .......................... 91 Hypothetical no. 2 - The liability of ISP in the case of illegal content and its effect on the freedom of expression principle ................................................................................................................................. 95 Hypothetical no. 3 – The limitation of freedom of expression on grounds of hate speech ..................... 98 4 Acknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude to the project partners and to the members of the e-NACT Working Group on Freedom of Expression for sharing their practice and experience concerning the application of the Charter, and for sending us their suggestions on how to improve the e-NACT handbook so as to make it useful to them. Terms of use This document may be freely used and distributed, provided that the document itself is not modified or shortened, that full authorship credit is given and that these terms of use are not removed but included with every copy. Address questions and comments to: [email protected] 5 Part I – Analysis of the legal area 1. The basics: what is freedom of expression? 1.1. The concept and features of freedom of expression The freedom of expression of each citizen and of the media plays a fundamental role in society. It is considered one of the pillars of a democratic society and an essential precondition for ensuring the protection of individuals’ other human rights.1 As a matter of fact, the freedom of every citizen to freely express his or her ideas nourishes a dialogue that in the end serves not only the individual but also society as a whole. In many European countries, freedom of expression is the cornerstone of the democratic order, meaning that it is not possible to talk about democracy in the absence of an effective flow of ideas and comparison among them.2 The tight connection between freedom of expression and democracy has been affirmed on several occasions by national courts. In Italy, the Constitutional Court has several times underlined that a democratic society is based on effective freedom of expression.3 In Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court has declared that freedom of expression and freedom of information are human rights enshrined
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interpreting the PKK's Signals in Europe
    PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume II, Issue 11 Interpreting the PKK’s Signals in Europe By Vera Eccarius-Kelly ince the Kurdish Worker’s Party (PKK) unexpectedly abducted three German hikers near Mt. Ararat in Turkey on 8 July 2008, and then released them on 20 July, intelligence sources in Europe have in- tensified their surveillance of PKK operatives among members of the particularly numerous Kurdish S Diaspora in Germany.[1] According to German newspaper reports, the PKK demanded that in ex- change for the release of the hikers “Berlin stop its hostile politics towards the Kurds and the PKK in Ger- many”.[2] While the exact purpose of the abduction requires further analysis, it is clear that it was the armed branch of the PKK, known as the People’s Defense Forces (HPG), that kidnapped the German hikers at their Mt. Ararat encampment at 10,500 feet in the evening hours—only to release them unharmed some two weeks later.[3] Questions Related to an Abduction Several questions preoccupy security analysts in relation to this abduction. How should this event be inter- preted in Europe, and particularly in Germany? What signals did the PKK send? And, most importantly, is the PKK entering a renewed phase of high intensity activism and terrorism in Europe? This essay aims to provide a brief analysis of the often confusing and contradictory messages sent by European Kurdish circles.[4] Despite convoluted interpretations of Kurdish demands that are linked to a lack of unity among the many Kurdish organizations in Europe, it is possible to disentangle the underlying messages.
    [Show full text]
  • Protesting As a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS the Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH
    Turkey HUMAN Protesting as a Terrorist Offense RIGHTS The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey WATCH Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey Copyright © 2010 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-708-6 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org November 2010 1-56432-708-6 Protesting as a Terrorist Offense The Arbitrary Use of Terrorism Laws to Prosecute and Incarcerate Demonstrators in Turkey I. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations ..........................................................................................................6 Methodology ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Historical Overview
    NOTES 1 Historical Overview 1. Possibly the two best studies of the Kurds in English remain Bruinessen, Agha, Shaikh and State; and McDowall, A Modern History of the Kurds. More recently, see Romano, The Kurdish Nationalist Movement; and Natali, The Kurds and the State. Portions of this chapter originally appeared in other articles and chapters I have published including “The Kurdish Problem in International Politics,” in Joseph, Turkey and the European Union, pp. 96–121. 2. For further discussions of the size of the Kurdish population, see McDowall, Modern History of the Kurds, pp. 3–5; Bruinessen, Agha, Shaikh and State, pp. 14–15; and Izady, The Kurds, pp. 111–20. For a detailed analysis that lists considerably smaller figures for Turkey, see Mutlu, “Ethnic Kurds in Turkey,” pp. 517–41. 3. For a solid study of the Sheikh Said revolt, see Olson, The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism. 4. For a recent detailed analysis of the Kurdish problem in Turkey, see Ozcan, Turkey’s Kurds. 5. “The Sun also Rises in the South East,” pp. 1–2. 6. For a meticulous analysis of the many problems involved, see Yildiz, The Kurds in Turkey, as well as my analysis in chapter 5 of this book. 7. “Ozkok: Biggest Crisis of Trust with US” Turkish Daily News, July 7, 2003; and Nicholas Kralev, “U.S. Warns Turkey against Operations in Northern Iraq.” Washington Times, July 8, 2003. 8. For recent detailed analysis of the Kurdish problem in Iraq, see Stansfield, Iraqi Kurdistan. 140 NOTES 9. For Henry Kissinger’s exact words, see “The CIA Report the President Doesn’t Want You to Read,” The Village Voice, February 16, 1976, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kurdish Diaspora in Canada: a Study of Political Activism and the Uses of the Kurdish Language
    The Kurdish Diaspora in Canada: A Study of Political Activism and The Uses of The Kurdish Language Esengul Tasdemir Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa Ó Esengul Tasdemir, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 Abstract This thesis focuses on the Kurdish people of Turkey, who have struggled and advocated for a separate nation-state of their own. The Turkish state’s denial of Kurdish identity, and its heavy assimilation and oppression of the Kurdish people have turned some Kurds into political activists, both in Turkey and in the diaspora. In addition, the historical ban and current stigmatization of the Kurdish language have crystallized the importance and centrality of the language, particularly for both Kurdish identity and the Kurdish movement. This thesis explores the forms of political activism in Canada of the Kurds originating in Turkey, and the role of the Kurdish language in their activism. Using a qualitative research design, interviews with activists and participant observations were conducted in the cities of Toronto and Montréal. The findings draw attention to the significance of community centres as umbrella institutions for political activism, and as sites for the enactment of different forms of collective resistance. The study also illustrates that the role of the Kurdish language in activism is more salient at a representational level. That is, the Kurdish language is represented as the main identity marker fuelling activism, implying that speaking Kurdish is an act of resistance and thus political.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Terror Problem: PKK Fronts Inside the EU | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1057 Europe's Terror Problem: PKK Fronts Inside the EU by Soner Cagaptay Dec 2, 2005 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Soner Cagaptay Soner Cagaptay is the Beyer Family fellow and director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis ince summer 2005, Turkish casualties resulting from attacks by the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) have been S mounting at a rate close to that experienced by U.S. forces in Iraq. Between July 1 and July 16, for example, when U.S. troops suffered nineteen deaths in Iraq, eleven Turks were killed by the PKK. The bloodshed is creating a nationalist backlash in Turkey, and because most Turks blame Washington for renewed PKK violence emanating from northern Iraq, it is also harming U.S.-Turkish relations. Given U.S. preoccupation with the Iraqi insurgency, a full-scale U.S campaign against the PKK in northern Iraq seems unlikely in the short term. But northern Iraq is not the only front on which the PKK is active; it also maintains a working infrastructure in Europe. The continuing PKK presence on the Continent angers Turkey. On November 16, Turkish prime minister Tayyip Erdogan walked out of a joint press conference with Danish prime minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen because Danish authorities would not remove representatives of the PKK's Roj TV propaganda arm from the meeting hall. The PKK's Image in Europe: From Freedom Fighters to Terrorists The PKK wreaked havoc in Turkey in the 1980s and 1990s, committing a wide range of violent atrocities, including attacks against Kurdish civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Peace in Permanent War: Terrorist Listing & Conflict
    Building Peace Building Peace in Permanent War Terrorist Listing and Confl ict in Permanent War Transformation Published by Transnational Institute International State Crime Initiative Supported by Berghof Foundation and the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust Louise Boon-Kuo Ben Hayes Vicki Sentas Gavin Sullivan Copyright © 2015 by Louise Boon-Kuo, Ben Hayes, Vicki Sentas, Gavin Sullivan This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license. You may copy and distribute the document, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the authors and used for non-commercial, educational, or public policy purposes. ISNN 978-90-70563-43-1 ISNN 978-90-70563-45-5 (e-book) Published by International State Crime Initiative School of Law, Queen Mary University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS United Kingdom statecrime.org/ Transnational Institute PO Box 14656 1001 LD Amsterdam The Netherlands Email: [email protected] www.tni.org Supported by the Berghof Foundation and the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust Authors: Louise Boon-Kuo, University of Sydney, [email protected] Ben Hayes, Statewatch, [email protected] Vicki Sentas, University of New South Wales, [email protected] Gavin Sullivan, University of Amsterdam, [email protected] Recommended citation: Boon-Kuo, L., Hayes, B., Sentas, V and Sullivan, G. (2015). Building Peace in Permanent War: Terrorist Listing & Conflict Transformation. London; Amsterdam: International State Crime Initiative; Transnational Institute. Layout and design: Hans Roor, Jubels bv, Amsterdam Printing: Jubels bv, Amsterdam Building Peace in Permanent War Terrorist Listing and Conflict Transformation Copyright © 2015 by Louise Boon-Kuo, Ben Hayes, Vicki Sentas, Gavin Sullivan This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdish Identity-Making: Instruments and Possibilities During the Last 100 Years in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey
    Kurdish identity-making: instruments and possibilities during the last 100 years in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey The research is based on a historical, comparative analysis of the Kurdish nation-building process. Three different periods are included in the comparison. First of all, the end of Ottoman Empire (meaning the beginning of Kurdish initiatives) and Atatürk’s era is presented. The second part makes an attempt to analyse the new wave of Kurdish revival process from the 60’s (doguculuk) and the appearance of Kurdish armed groups, as well as the rise of PKK. The final part focuses on the contemporary developments, by putting an emphasis on the AKP-led government’s era which created a new atmosphere in order to solve this Kurdish question by launching a programme called ‘Kürt acilimi’. This paper endeavours to mark the cornerstones and features of the Kurdish nation-building process, by emphasizing the role of the creation of myth, traditions, and history: how the different generations of Kurds tried to establish a common culture. The comparison emphasizes the multifaceted features of the process and tries to prove that ‘nations are repeatedly formed and re-formed.’ In its focal point there are issues such as the role of Newroz, the national anthem, the flag, or even the history. The theoretical framework used in this comparative study – which analyses the hundred-year-long historical background of the process – is essentially based on the nationalism theory of Anthony D. Smith. Therefore, first and foremost, the main concepts which this comparison intends to use shall be presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Pkk's Regional Franchise of Terror
    PKK’ S REGIONAL FRANCHISE OF TERROR OF FRANCHISE REGIONAL PKK’S REGIONAL FRANCHISE OF TERROR Uluslararası Terörizm ve Güvenlik Araştırmaları Merkezi (UTGAM) International Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM) Necatibey Caddesi No:118 Anıttepe-Ankara/Türkiye Tel: +90 (312) 4629087-91-92-93 The statements, views, and opinions contained on this report are those of the authors BAYRAM ALİ SONER and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of International ÖMER ASLAN Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM). HAKAN KIYICI PKK’S REGIONAL FRANCHISE OF TERROR Bayram Ali SONER Ömer ASLAN Hakan KIYICI Uluslararası Terörizm ve Güvenlik Araştırmaları Merkezi (UTGAM) International Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM) Mayıs / May 2017 PKK’S REGIONAL FRANCHISE OF TERROR Assoc. Prof. Bayram Ali SONER Assist. Prof. Ömer ASLAN Hakan KIYICI COPYRIGHT © 2017 by UTGAM All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of International Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM). Photograph: Two PKK militants take refuge from DEASH gunfire in an abandoned building in Sinjar, Iraq. April 2015. (Erin Trieb) Turkish National Police Academy Uluslararası Terörizm ve Güvenlik Araştırmaları Merkezi (UTGAM) International Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM) Necatibey Caddesi No:118 Anıttepe-Ankara/Türkiye Tel: +90 (312) 4629087-91-92-93 The statements, views, and opinions contained on this report are those of the authors and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of International Center for Terrorism and Security Studies (UTGAM).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact on Freedom of Expression in Turkey
    THE IMPACT ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN TURKEY BY ALEV YAMAN English PEN is the founding centre of a global literary network. We work to defend and promote free expression, and to remove INTRODUCTION 2 barriers to literature. From defending the rights of persecuted writers to promoting literature in translation and running writing workshops in schools and prisons, English PEN seeks to advocate literature as BACKGROUND 3 a means of intercultural understanding, encouraging the friendly co-operation of writers and free exchange of ideas. English PEN is supported by our active membership of literary professionals, as HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 4 well as by the generosity of individual donors, corporate sponsors and grants from trusts and foundations. JOURNALISM UNDER ATTACK 11 For more information, please visit the English PEN website www.englishpen.org or follow us on Twitter @englishpen JOURNALISM UNDER ATTACK CASE STUDY: English PEN is a registered charity in England and Wales, registration number 1125610. CAN DÜNDAR 18 English PEN Free Word Centre SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE PROTESTS 20 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA SOCIAL MEDIA CASE STUDY: Tel: +44 (0)20 7324 2535 İHSAN ELİAÇIK 25 PEN International promotes literature and freedom of expression and is governed by the PEN Charter and the principles it embodies: unhampered transmission of thought within each nation and CONCLUSION AND between all nations. Founded in London in 1921, PEN International – PEN’s Secretariat – connects an international community of writers. RECOMMENDATIONS 28 It is a forum where writers meet freely to discuss their work; it is also a voice speaking out for writers silenced in their own countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Resolution: an Assessment of Possibilities, Opportunities and Problems
    TURKEY PEACE ASSEMBLY TOWARDS A RESOLUTION: AN ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBILITIES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PROBLEMS Assoc. Dr. Ayşe Betül Çelik Sabancı University, Department Member Murat Çelikkan Journalist-Centre for Truth Justice Memory Assoc.Prof. Evren Balta Yıldız Technical University, Department Member Assist.Prof. Nil Mutluer Nişantaşı University, Department Member Assoc. Prof. Levent Korkut Medipol University, Department Member Turkey Peace Assembly NOVEMBER 2015 [email protected] | [email protected] +90 (212) 249 2654 www.turkiyebarismeclisi.com /Baris_Meclisi 1 TOWARDS A RESOLUTION AN ASSESSMENT OF POSSIBILITIES, OPPORTUNITIES AND PROBLEMS This report covers the resolution/peace process that took place between the years of 2013 and 2015 in Turkey. It was the first time that the Turkish army and the PKK experienced bilateral ceasefire. This work aimed to contribute to the peace process in the transformation of the ceasefire into a negotiation process. After this report had been written, in President Erdoğan’s words the peace process has been put into deep freeze. And now, peace process had changed into a violent process in Turkey. There have been street clashes, deaths, bombings and all-out massacres. Local mayors and politicians were arrested by the state. More then hundred people were killed in Ankara and Suruç blasts. Diyarbakır Bar President Tahir Elçi was killed while he was making a press statement asking an end to violence. This violent atmosphere under- mined the efforts of democratic powers, NGOs, and peace groups. The report which was written before the start of the violence tried to draw the attention of the actors to the shortcomings and dangers in the peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Policy in Turkey and Its Effect on the Kurdish Language
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-2015 Language Policy in Turkey and Its Effect on the Kurdish Language Sevda Arslan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Anthropological Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Recommended Citation Arslan, Sevda, "Language Policy in Turkey and Its Effect on the Kurdish Language" (2015). Master's Theses. 620. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/620 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANGUAGE POLICY IN TURKEY AND ITS EFFECT ON THE KURDISH LANGUAGE by Sevda Arslan A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Political Science Western Michigan University August 2015 Thesis Committee: Emily Hauptmann, Ph.D., Chair Kristina Wirtz, Ph.D. Mahendra Lawoti, Ph.D. LANGUAGE POLICY IN TURKEY AND ITS EFFECT ON THE KURDISH LANGUAGE Sevda Arslan, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2015 For many decades the Kurdish language was ignored and banned from public use and Turkish became the lingua franca for all citizens to speak. This way, the Turkish state sought to create a nation-state based on one language and attempted to eliminate the use of other languages, particularly Kurdish, through severe regulations and prohibitions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Migrant Media
    Research Group Transnationalism Institute of Cultural Anthropology and European Ethnology Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Exit and Voice Revisited: the Challenge of Migrant Media Kira Kosnick Research Group Transnationalism Working Paper Number 9 June 2008 Research Group Transnationalism Working Paper Number 9 Kira Kosnick Exit and Voice Revisited: the Challenge of Migrant Media. Dr. Kira Kosnick Research Group Transnationalism [email protected] Abstract This paper discusses the implications of transnational media production and diasporic net- works for the cultural politics of migrant minorities. How are fields of cultural politics transformed if Hirschmann’s famous options ‘exit’ and ‘voice’ are no longer constituting mutually exclusive responses to dissent within a nation-state, but modes of action that can combine and build upon each other in the context of migration and diasporic media activ- ism? Two case studies are discussed in more detail, relating to Alevi amateur television production in Germany and to a Kurdish satellite television station that reaches out to a di- aspora across Europe and the Middle East. Keywords: migrant media, transnationalism, Alevis, Kurds, Turkey, Germany 2 Research Group Transnationalism Working Paper Number 9 Kira Kosnick Exit and Voice Revisited: the Challenge of Migrant Media In 1970, economist and political scientists Albert O. Hirschman published a small study that was to have a lasting influence on the social sciences. Exit and voice, he claimed, were the two alternative modes of action that those dissatisfied with the performance of different organizations, including that of nation-states, could pursue. Ever since, scholars across the social sciences have been concerned with trying to determine what prompts one or the other course of action, and the relationship between them.
    [Show full text]