Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. -
Annuals for Your Xeriscape
ANNUALS FOR YOUR XERISCAPE Craig R. Miller Parks & Open Space Manager www.cpnmd.org Characteristics of the Best-Drought Tolerant Annuals An annual is a plant that completes its life cycle, from germination to the production of seeds, within one year, and then dies. The best-drought tolerant annuals tend to have smaller leaves, which minimize moisture evaporation. The leaves may be waxy to retain moisture, or they may be covered with silvery or white hairs to reflect light. Drought-tolerant annuals often have long roots so they can reach for moisture deep in the soil. How to Grow Drought-Tolerant Annuals Even drought tolerant plants need a little extra water when they're getting established, so don't just plant and run. Water well while your annuals are settling in, then watch for signs of wilt as the summer progresses. Typically, drought-tolerant annuals require very little care. Most are happy with a deep watering whenever the soil is relatively dry. Most don’t tolerate bone dry soil. Check container plants often! Fertilize regularly throughout the blooming season to support continued flowering. Pinch seedlings at least once or twice to promote bushy growth and deadhead wilted blooms regularly to prevent plants from going to seed early. As a general rule, plants that are suitable for sun or shade are also well suited for containers. Just be sure the plants that share a container have similar needs. Don’t plant sun-loving plants in the same pots as annuals that need shade, or very drought-tolerant annuals with water loving plants. -
Invasive Geophytes of South West Australia; Recent Studies on Biology, Ecology and Management
id22961250 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Invasive Geophytes of south west Australia; Recent Studies on Biology, Ecology and Management Kate Brown & Grazyna Paczkowska Urban Nature Program, Department of Environment and Conservation, Swan Region •Around 53 species of invasive geophytes in south-west Australia •40 species come from the family Iridaceae •98% are from the Cape Province of South Africa •All have been introduced for horticulture and have escaped from gardens •The ability to move into relatively undisturbed native plant communities make geophytes one of the most serious groups of weeds in south-west Australia Watsonia meriana Native geophytes, Meelon Nature Reserve •How selective is the herbicide 2-2 DPA for Watsonia meriana among the flora of a clay based ephemeral wetland? •Does the native flora of these wetlands have the capacity to regenerate following control of an invasive geophyte? •Is there a role for fire in that restoration process? Watsonia meriana invasion of a clay based ephemeral wetland •5 transects, 30 1x 1m quadrats September •Recorded 2005 cover of native and (before introduced treatment) taxa in each quadrat September 2006 (one year after treatment) ANOSIM Comparing 2005 with 2006 Global R = 0.501 P < 0.01 Average Bray-Curtis dissimilarity measure = 87% 2005 2006 Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Watsonia bulbillifera 70.0 0.3 Cyathochaeta avenacea 9.0 10.0 Chorizandra enodis 2.0 2.0 Caesia micrantha 2.7 1.4 Viminaria juncea 2.0 1.1 *Briza sp. 3.2 0.2 Drosera rosulata 1.2 0.3 Tribonanthes sp. -
Section 5 Appendices: Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority
Bot anic Gardens and Parks Authority Annua l Report 2012/13 • Celebrating our visitors Contents Appendices ............................................................................................................... 152 Appendix 1 – BGPA Stakeholders ......................................................................... 152 Appendix 2 – Volunteer Group Reports ................................................................. 154 Friends of Bold Park Bushland .......................................................................... 154 Friends of Kings Park ......................................................................................... 157 Kings Park Volunteer Guides ............................................................................. 163 Kings Park Volunteer Master Gardeners ........................................................... 168 Honour Avenues Maintenance Group ................................................................ 172 Appendix 3 – Publications ...................................................................................... 174 BGPA Information and Publications ................................................................... 174 Scientific Journals and Publications ................................................................... 174 For People and Plants - Friends of Kings Park Magazine .................................. 178 Appendix 4 - Scientific Research Projects ............................................................. 180 Appendix 5 – Research Scientists and Students .................................................. -
Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Ii
Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia ii WEED CONTROL HANDBOOK CONTENTS FOR DECLARED PLANTS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Acknowledgements NRM Biosecurity INDEX TO RECOMMENDED HERBICIDES s 4HEFOLLOWING.2-/FlCERS0ETER-ICHELMORE *OEL 0HONE FOR DECLARED PLANTS OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA _____________ 01 (ORN 3ANDY#UMMINS +YM(AEBICH 0AUL'ILLEN &AX 2USSELL.ORMAN !NTON+URRAY 4ONY2ICHMAN %MAILNRMBIOSECURITY SAGOVAU -ICHAEL7ILLIAMS !LAN2OBINS 2ORY7IADROWSKI 7EBWWWPIRSAGOVAUBIOSECURITYSANRM?BIOSECURITY ABOUT THIS BOOK _________________________________ 03 )GGY(ONAN 4ONY:WAR 'REG0ATRICK 'RANT2OBERTS ¥3OUTH!USTRALIAN'OVERNMENT +EVIN4EAGUEAND0HIL%LSON 2EQUESTSANDENQUIRIESCONCERNINGREPRODUCTIONAND THE PLANTS INCLUDED IN THIS BOOK ____________________ 04 s 4HEFOLLOWING2URAL3OLUTIONS3!#ONSULTANTS RIGHTSSHOULDBEADDRESSEDTO !DRIAN(ARVEYAND*OHN0ITT "IOSECURITY3! HERBICIDE USE ____________________________________ 06 s 7EED3OCIETYOF1UEENSLAND)NCFORTHEIR '0/"OX PUBLICATION7EEDSOF3OUTHERN1UEENSLAND !DELAIDE3! WEED CONTROL METHODS ___________________________ 12 s 4HE.37$EPARTMENTOF0RIMARY)NDUSTRIESFORTHEIR )3". PRINT PUBLICATION.OXIOUSANDENVIRONMENTALWEEDCONTROL )3". PDF Non-herbicide control methods ___________________ 13 HANDBOOKnAGUIDETOWEEDCONTROLINNON CROP Disclaimer AQUATICANDBUSHLANDSITUATION Herbicide control methods _______________________ 15 5SEOFTHEINFORMATIONINTHISHANDBOOKISATYOUROWNRISK0RIMARY s 4HE%NVIRONMENT0ROTECTION!UTHORITYFORTHEIR )NDUSTRIES2EGIONS3OUTH!USTRALIA "IOSECURITY3!ANDTHEIR -
RECOVERY TEAM Annual Report
RECOVERY TEAM Annual report THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team Albany Threatened Flora Reporting Period DATE FROM: 1/1/14 DATE TO: 31/12/14 Submission date 31 March Current membership Member Representing Sarah Comer DPAW Chair Sarah Barrett DPAW Exec Officer Members Linda Strahan Albany Wildflower Society Libby Sandiford Albany Wildflower Society John Tucker Community member Margaret Pieroni Community member Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society Andrew Brown DPAW Dave Coates DPAW Anne Cochrane DPAW Rebecca Dillon DPAW Steve Hopper UWA 9/5/13 &12/11/13 Dates meetings were held Highlights of achievements for the 21 new populations or sub-populations of 11 Threatened flora previous 12 months suitable for were located. Of significance were new populations of Daviesia publication in WATSNU and pseudaphylla (CR), new sub-populations of Banksia brownii contribution to DEC annual report. (CR), Lambertia fairallii (CR) and Boronia clavata; and new Provide 1-2 paragraphs summarising populations of Gastrolobium humile (x4), Eucalyptus nutans total number of new populations and Eremophila denticulata ssp denticulata. located, surveys completed, list major management actions etc 43 new populations of priority flora were located including significant new populations of Allocasuarina sp Boxwood Hill (P1). and two species removed from the Priority flora list due to survey. 5000m2 of fencing (8 x 25x25m enclosures) was completed on Bluff Knoll within the Montane Heath & Thicket TEC . This will be critical for the protection and reproductive success of Critically Endangered Darwinia collina, Leucopogon gnaphalioides, Latrobea colophona and Andersonia axilliflora. The benefits of fencing were already evident by Dec 2014 and has enabled heavily grazed plants of species such as L. -
Appendix 2 Flora and Vegetation Assessment
FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT OF CLOVERDALE LEASE AREA Prepared for: Iluka Resources Ltd Prepared by: Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd December 2005 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD IRL0508/214/05 Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................2 2.1 Declared Rare, Priority and Threatened Species...............................................................................2 2.2 Wetlands............................................................................................................................................4 2.3 Local and Regional Significance.......................................................................................................5 2.4 Vegetation .........................................................................................................................................5 2.5 Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................................................6 3. OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................7 4. METHODS ......................................................................................................................................7 5. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................8 -
Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report 0
Department of Environment and Conservation and Environment of Department Department of Environment and Conservation 2008-2009 Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report Annual 2008-2009 0 ' "p 2009195 E R N M O V E G N T E O H T F W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Corporate Communications Branch, Department of Environment and Conservation. For more information contact: Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 6364 6500 Facsimile (08) 6364 6520 Recommended reference The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Environment and Conservation 2008–2009 Annual Report, Department of Environment and Conservation, 2009. We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at www.dec.wa.gov.au. ISSN 1835-1131 (Print) ISSN 1835-114X (Online) 8 September 2009 Letter to THE MINISter Back Contents Forward Hon Donna Faragher MLC Minister for Environment In accordance with section 63 of the Financial Management Act 2006, I have pleasure in submitting for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. This report has been prepared in accordance with provisions of the Financial Management Act 2006. Keiran McNamara Director General DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 2008–2009 ANNUAL REPORT 3 DIRECTOR GENERAL’S FOREWORD Back Contents Forward This is the third annual report of the Department of Environment and Conservation since it was created through the merger of the former Department of Environment and Department of Conservation and Land Management. -
Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Forest Trees
Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources . Chittaranjan Kole Editor Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources Forest Trees Editor Prof. Chittaranjan Kole Director of Research Institute of Nutraceutical Research Clemson University 109 Jordan Hall Clemson, SC 29634 [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-21249-9 e-ISBN 978-3-642-21250-5 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21250-5 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922649 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: deblik, Berlin Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedication Dr. Norman Ernest Borlaug,1 the Father of Green Revolution, is well respected for his contribu- tions to science and society. There was or is not and never will be a single person on this Earth whose single-handed service to science could save millions of people from death due to starvation over a period of over four decades like Dr. -
Banksia Montana Mealybug)
Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only) Species name (scientific and common name): Pseudococcus markharveyi (Banksia montana mealybug) Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: Critically Endangered: B1+2ab(iii) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 10 Nomination summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Pseudococcus markharveyi Common name: Banksia montana mealybug Family name: Pseudococcidae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Listing category i.e. Date listed or Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species critically endangered assessed (or N/A) B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs or ‘none’ International (IUCN 12/03/2014 Critically Endangered B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Red List) National (EPBC Act) State / Territory 1. -
Conservation Advice Acacia Subflexuosa Subsp. Capillata
THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this conservation advice on 01/10/2015 Conservation Advice Acacia subflexuosa subsp. capillata hairy-stemmed zig-zag wattle Conservation Status Acacia subflexuosa subsp. capillata (hairy-stemmed zig-zag wattle) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as endangered as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the endangered category are a restricted extent of occurrence and a low number of mature individuals (Harris and Brown, 2003). In 1998, the subspecies was listed as Rare Flora and Critically Endangered in Western Australia (Wildlife Conservation Act 1950). Description The hairy-stemmed zig-zag wattle is a rounded shrub (Brown et al., 1998) to 1 m tall with thickened, sharply-pointed phyllodes, 3 to 4 cm long and 1 to 1.5 mm wide (Harris and Brown, 2003). Flowers are in yellow globular heads (Orchard and Wilson, 2001), on 4 to 6 mm long stalks and appear from August to November (Brown et al., 1998; Cowan & Maslin 1999). Pods are narrow and coiled, 4 cm long and 2 mm wide. Distribution The hairy-stemmed zig-zag wattle is endemic to the Cunderdin-Tammin area of Western Australia where it occurs over a range of less than 5 km (Orchard and Wilson, 2001). -
Interim Recovery Plan No. 370
Interim Recovery Plan No. 370 Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 2016-2021 October 2016 1 Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Policy Statement No. 35 (DPaW 2015a) and Department of Parks and Wildlife Corporate Guideline No. 35 (DPaW 2015b). This Interim Recovery Plan replaces plan number 52 ‘Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 1999-2001’ by S. Barrett. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address the threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The department is committed to ensuring that threatened ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the department’s Director of Science and Conservation. This IRP will operate from 4 December 2016 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the ecological community is still listed as Threatened after five years, this Interim Recovery Plan will be replaced or updated. This IRP was approved by the Director of Science and Conservation on 4 December 2016. The provision of funds identified in this IRP is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting the department, as well as the need to address other priorities.