Wild Watsonia (DPI Vic)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Liliaceae S.L. (Lily Family)
Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Ben Legler Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Lilium columbianum Xerophyllum tenax Trillium ovatum Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Fritillaria lanceolata Ref.1 Textbook DVD KRR&DLN Erythronium americanum Allium vineale Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) Herbs; Ref.2 Stems often modified as underground rhizomes, corms, or bulbs; Flowers actinomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals, 6 stamens, 3 carpels, ovary superior (or inferior). Tulipa gesneriana Liliaceae s.l. (Lily family) “Liliaceae” s.l. (sensu lato: “in the broad sense”) - Lily family; 288 genera/4950 species, including Lilium, Allium, Trillium, Tulipa; This family is treated in a very broad sense in this class, as in the Flora of the Pacific Northwest. The “Liliaceae” s.l. taught in this class is not monophyletic. It is apparent now that the family should be treated in a narrower sense and some of the members should form their own families. Judd et al. recognize 15+ families: Agavaceae, Alliaceae, Amarylidaceae, Asparagaceae, Asphodelaceae, Colchicaceae, Dracaenaceae (Nolinaceae), Hyacinthaceae, Liliaceae, Melanthiaceae, Ruscaceae, Smilacaceae, Themidaceae, Trilliaceae, Uvulariaceae and more!!! (see web reading “Consider the Lilies”) Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Hannah Marx Photo: Hannah Marx Iris pseudacorus Iridaceae (Iris family) Photo: Yaowu Yuan Photo: Yaowu Yuan Sisyrinchium douglasii Sisyrinchium sp. Iridaceae (Iris family) Iridaceae - 78 genera/1750 species, Including Iris, Gladiolus, Sisyrinchium. Herbs, aquatic or terrestrial; Underground stems as rhizomes, bulbs, or corms; Leaves alternate, 2-ranked and equitant Ref.3 (oriented edgewise to the stem; Gladiolus italicus Flowers actinomorphic or zygomorphic; 3 sepals and 3 petals or 6 tepals; Stamens 3; Ovary of 3 fused carpels, inferior. -
The Taxonomic Status of Gladiolus Illyricus (Iridaceae) in Britain
The Taxonomic Status of Gladiolus illyricus (Iridaceae) in Britain Aeron Buchanan Supervisor: Fred Rumsey, Natural History Museum, London A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science of Imperial College, London Abstract First noticed officially in Britain in 1855, Gladiolus illyricus (Koch) presents an interesting taxonomic and biogeographical challenge: whether or not this isolated northern population should be recognized as a separate sub-species. Fundamental conservation issues rest on the outcome. Here, the investigation into the relationship of the G. illyricus plants of the New Forest, Hampshire, to Gladiolus species across Europe, northern Africa and the middle east is initiated. Two chloroplast regions, one in trnL–trnF and the other across psbA–trnH have been sequenced for 42 speci- mens of G. illyricus, G. communis, G. italicus, G. atroviolaceus, G. triphyllos and G. anatolicus. Phylogenetic and biogeographical treatments support the notion of an east–west genetic gradation along the Mediterranean. Iberia particularly appears as a zone of high hybridization potential and the source of the New Forest population. Alignment with sequences obtained from GenBank give strong support to the classic taxonomy of Gladiolus being monophyletic in its sub-family, Ixioideae. Comments on these chloroplast regions for barcoding are also given. In conclusion, the genetic localization of Britain’s G. illyricus population as an extremity haplotype suggests that it could well deserve sub-species status. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Background 4 3 Materials and Methods 8 4 Results and Discussion 15 5 Conclusions 26 Appendices 28 References 56 1. Introduction G. illyricus in Britain Figure 1: G. -
Weed Risk Assessment for Iris Pseudacorus L. (Iridaceae)
Weed Risk Assessment for Iris United States pseudacorus L. (Iridaceae) – Yellow Department of flag iris Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service September 24, 2013 Version 1 Left: Iris pseudacorus flower. Right: A colony of Iris pseudacorus (source: Bugwood, 2013). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Iris pseudacorus Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA)— specifically, the PPQ WRA model (Koop et al., 2012)—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because the PPQ WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or for any area within it. As part of this analysis, we use a stochastic simulation to evaluate how much the uncertainty associated with the analysis affects the model outcomes. -
Flowering of Watsonia Laccata As Influenced by Corm Storage and Forcing Temperatures ⁎ J.K
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 77 (2011) 631–637 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Flowering of Watsonia laccata as influenced by corm storage and forcing temperatures ⁎ J.K. Suh a, , J.H. Kim a, A.K. Lee a, M.S. Roh b a Dankook University, College of Bio-Resources Science, Department of Environmental Horticulture, Cheonan, Chungnam 330-714, Republic of Korea b US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Arboretum, Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit, Beltsville MD 20705, USA Received 24 March 2010; received in revised form 28 November 2010; accepted 22 December 2010 Abstract The genus Watsonia, belonging to the family Iridaceae, is comprised of about 50 species including W. laccata (Jacquin) Ker Gawler that flowers from September to November following low temperature and winter rainfall. Therefore, we hypothesized that flowering would be favored by forcing at low greenhouse temperatures. Using clonal W. laccata corms, four experiments were designed to investigate the effect of temperatures during corm storage, forcing, and their interaction on growth and flowering. Corm formation is favored by growing plants at 18°– 20°/15°–17 °C and 21°–23°/18°–20 °C, day/night temperatures. Flowering was earliest with corms produced at 24°–26°/18°–20 °C and forced at 18°–20/15°–17 °C, and was significantly delayed when forced at 27°–29°/24°–26 °C. Flowering was, however, favored by 2 or 4 weeks of high temperatures (27°–29°/24°–26 °C) prior to forcing at low temperatures (18°–20°/15°–17 °C). The number of florets was not significantly affected by corm storage, forcing temperatures, or their interaction, although forcing at high temperatures tends to reduce the floret number. -
Invasive Geophytes of South West Australia; Recent Studies on Biology, Ecology and Management
id22961250 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Invasive Geophytes of south west Australia; Recent Studies on Biology, Ecology and Management Kate Brown & Grazyna Paczkowska Urban Nature Program, Department of Environment and Conservation, Swan Region •Around 53 species of invasive geophytes in south-west Australia •40 species come from the family Iridaceae •98% are from the Cape Province of South Africa •All have been introduced for horticulture and have escaped from gardens •The ability to move into relatively undisturbed native plant communities make geophytes one of the most serious groups of weeds in south-west Australia Watsonia meriana Native geophytes, Meelon Nature Reserve •How selective is the herbicide 2-2 DPA for Watsonia meriana among the flora of a clay based ephemeral wetland? •Does the native flora of these wetlands have the capacity to regenerate following control of an invasive geophyte? •Is there a role for fire in that restoration process? Watsonia meriana invasion of a clay based ephemeral wetland •5 transects, 30 1x 1m quadrats September •Recorded 2005 cover of native and (before introduced treatment) taxa in each quadrat September 2006 (one year after treatment) ANOSIM Comparing 2005 with 2006 Global R = 0.501 P < 0.01 Average Bray-Curtis dissimilarity measure = 87% 2005 2006 Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Watsonia bulbillifera 70.0 0.3 Cyathochaeta avenacea 9.0 10.0 Chorizandra enodis 2.0 2.0 Caesia micrantha 2.7 1.4 Viminaria juncea 2.0 1.1 *Briza sp. 3.2 0.2 Drosera rosulata 1.2 0.3 Tribonanthes sp. -
For the Flora of Central Asia
©Biologiezentrum Linz, Austria, download www.biologiezentrum.at KHASSANOV & RAKHIMOVA • The genus Iris in Central Asia STAPFIA 97 (2012): 174–179 Taxonomic revision of the genus Iris L. (Iridaceae Juss.) for the flora of Central Asia F. O. KHASSANOV* & N. RAKHIMOVA Abstract: A new conspectus of the genus Iris (including the genera Juno and Iridodictyum) is presented for the rich flora of Central Asia. Two new combinations as well as new epithetha for two species are proposed. Zusammenfassung: Die Gattung Iris (inklusive der Gattungen Juno und Iridodictyum) wurde für die reiche Flora Zentralasiens systematisch bearbeitet. Zwei neue Kombinationen, sowie neue Epitheta für zwei Arten werden vorgeschlagen. Key words: Taxonomy, Iris, Juno, Central Asia, nomenclature. * Correspondence to: [email protected] Introduction ulate bulb tunics. Amazingly that 36 species of Iris are endemic for this area (fig. 1–3). Nomenclature changes has been started by P. WENDELBO (1975). R. KAMELIN (1981) and later on T. Hall During the last 70 years in all floristic revisions for Central et A. SEISUMS (2011) made several new combinations from Juno Asia made by A. I. VVEDENSKY (1941, 1971) section Juno was restoring to Iris. Nevertheless, several taxa needed in nomen- treated as a separated genus. 30 species were mentioned and sev- clature correction as well new ones described recently from this eral new species were newly described in his last revision. In- area. No doubt, that Central Asia can be treated as one of the terestingly enough, that all other genera of Iridaceae (including largest centers of biodiversity of genus Iris L. and proposed con- Iris) has been revised in “Conspectus Florae Asiae Mediae” by spectus given below based on revisions of R. -
Growing the Gladiolus
Volume 3 Article 1 Bulletin P85 Growing the Gladiolus 7-1-1947 Growing the Gladiolus L. C. Grove Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bulletinp Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Grove, L. C. (1947) "Growing the Gladiolus," Bulletin P: Vol. 3 : Bulletin P85 , Article 1. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bulletinp/vol3/iss85/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Publications at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin P by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grove: Growing the Gladiolus g N SIO N SER V IC E, Cooperating Published by Iowa State University Digital Repository, 1947 AMES, IOWA 1 Bulletin P, Vol. 3, No. 85 [1947], Art. 1 CONTENTS Page Growth development ....................................................................,807 Propagation ................................ .. ........................................... 809 Methods ..................................................... 809 Bulbs . , .......................................................... 810 Sizes ......................................•.....................................................810 Bulb shape ............................................................. 810 Varieties .............................. 811 Flower uses ................. ...................................................................811 -
GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field. -
Managing Watsonia Invasion in the Threatened Plant Communities of South-West Australia’S Clay-Based Wetlands
Managing Watsonia invasion in the threatened plant communities of south-west Australia’s clay-based wetlands. K. Brown, G. Paczkowska, B. Huston and N. Withnell. Department of Environment and Conservation, W.A. Email: [email protected] The Seasonal Clay-based Wetlands of South-west Australia While the majority of seasonal wetlands in south-west Australia are connected to the regional ground water, there are a series of wetlands found on clay substrates that rely solely on rainwater to fill. These wetlands are characterised by temporally overlapping suites of annual herbs that flower and set seed as the wetlands dry through spring. Over summer the clay substrates dry to impervious pans. The plant communities of clay-based wetlands comprise a flora of over 600. At least 50% are annual or perennial herbs, 16 occur only on the clay-pans and many are rare or restricted (Figure 1). The seasonally inundated clays that support these communities are relatively productive agricultural soils and many were cleared soon after settlement. Those that remained intact were largely located on the Swan Coastal Plain in close proximity to metropolitan Perth. In more recent years large areas have disappeared under urban development and today the plant communities of seasonal clay-based wetlands are amongst the most threatened in Western Australia. The small and fragmented nature of these remaining wetlands leaves them vulnerable to a range of threatening processes. In particular weed invasion, specifically by the South African geophyte Watsonia (Watsonia meriana var. bulbillifera), is a major threat. Watsonia can disperse via cormels (tiny corms that develop along the flowering stem at the end of the flowering season), into relatively undisturbed bushland remnants, forming dense stands that effectively displace the diverse herbaceous understorey (Figure 2). -
Watsonia Workshop Proceedings of a Workshop Held at the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) on August 4 1993
Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.8(3) 1993 77 Watsonia Workshop Proceedings of a workshop held at the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) on August 4 1993. Organized by CALMs Science and Information Division and funded by the WA Roadside Conservation Committee. Editors: J. Patrick Pigott, WA Herbarium, Science and Information Division, Department of Conservation and Land Management, PO Box 104, Como, WA 6152, Australia. C. Mary Gray, Environmental Scientist, 24 Hillview Road, Mt Lawley, WA 6050, Australia. Western Australian species of Watsonia Neville Marchant, Acting Director, WA Herbarium, Science and Information Division, Department of Conservation and Land Management, PO Box 104, Como, WA 6152, Australia. Introduction How and when did watsonias come with settlers who arrived in Western Aus- Watsonia in Western Australia is an unu- to WA? tralia well after Georgiana Molloy. sual weed group in that there are about The characteristic of Watsonia which There are 52 species of Watsonia recog- eight species of the one genus in the State. brought so many species to this State is nized in a comprehensive treatment pub- A whole suite of species and their vari- that they have very attractive flowers. In lished in 1989 by Peter Goldblatt who has ants were introduced as garden plants in January 1830, en route to Fremantle, when reviewed all of the species described since the early days of the Swan River Colony. travellers to Western Australia called into the first one was published in 1754. The In their native habitats in southern Af- Cape Town, Georgiana Molloy spent £7 type of study made by Goldblatt, system- rica there are about 52 species of Watsonia, 17s 6d on seeds from the Cape, among atic research, entails the detailed exami- 34 of them occurring in the Cape area them oleanders, Cape gooseberries and a nation of herbarium material and litera- which has a similar climate to that of pink lily, the Watsonia. -
Insights from Microsporogenesis in Asparagales
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 9:5, 460–471 (2007) Constraints and selection: insights from microsporogenesis in Asparagales Laurent Penet,a,1,Ã Michel Laurin,b Pierre-Henri Gouyon,a,c and Sophie Nadota aLaboratoire Ecologie, Syste´matique et Evolution, Batiment 360, Universite´ Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Ce´dex, France bUMR CNRS 7179, Universite´ Paris 6FPierre & Marie Curie, 2 place Jussieu, Case 7077, 75005 Paris, France cMuse´um National d’Histoire Naturelle, De´partement de Syste´matique et Evolution Botanique, 12 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris CP 39, France ÃAuthor for correspondence (email: [email protected]) 1Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth & Ruskin, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. SUMMARY Developmental constraints have been proposed different characteristics of microsporogenesis, only cell to interfere with natural selection in limiting the available wall formation appeared as constrained. We show that set of potential adaptations. Whereas this concept has constraints may also result from biases in the correlated long been debated on theoretical grounds, it has been occurrence of developmental steps (e.g., lack of successive investigated empirically only in a few studies. In this article, cytokinesis when wall formation is centripetal). We document we evaluate the importance of developmental constraints such biases and their potential outcomes, notably the during microsporogenesis (male meiosis in plants), with an establishment of intermediate stages, which allow emphasis on phylogenetic patterns in Asparagales. Different development to bypass such constraints. These insights are developmental constraints were tested by character discussed with regard to potential selection on pollen reshuffling or by simulated distributions. Among the morphology. INTRODUCTION 1991) also hindered tests using the concept (Pigliucci and Kaplan 2000). -
Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Ii
Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia Weed Control Handbook for Declared Plants in South Australia ii WEED CONTROL HANDBOOK CONTENTS FOR DECLARED PLANTS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA Acknowledgements NRM Biosecurity INDEX TO RECOMMENDED HERBICIDES s 4HEFOLLOWING.2-/FlCERS0ETER-ICHELMORE *OEL 0HONE FOR DECLARED PLANTS OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA _____________ 01 (ORN 3ANDY#UMMINS +YM(AEBICH 0AUL'ILLEN &AX 2USSELL.ORMAN !NTON+URRAY 4ONY2ICHMAN %MAILNRMBIOSECURITY SAGOVAU -ICHAEL7ILLIAMS !LAN2OBINS 2ORY7IADROWSKI 7EBWWWPIRSAGOVAUBIOSECURITYSANRM?BIOSECURITY ABOUT THIS BOOK _________________________________ 03 )GGY(ONAN 4ONY:WAR 'REG0ATRICK 'RANT2OBERTS ¥3OUTH!USTRALIAN'OVERNMENT +EVIN4EAGUEAND0HIL%LSON 2EQUESTSANDENQUIRIESCONCERNINGREPRODUCTIONAND THE PLANTS INCLUDED IN THIS BOOK ____________________ 04 s 4HEFOLLOWING2URAL3OLUTIONS3!#ONSULTANTS RIGHTSSHOULDBEADDRESSEDTO !DRIAN(ARVEYAND*OHN0ITT "IOSECURITY3! HERBICIDE USE ____________________________________ 06 s 7EED3OCIETYOF1UEENSLAND)NCFORTHEIR '0/"OX PUBLICATION7EEDSOF3OUTHERN1UEENSLAND !DELAIDE3! WEED CONTROL METHODS ___________________________ 12 s 4HE.37$EPARTMENTOF0RIMARY)NDUSTRIESFORTHEIR )3". PRINT PUBLICATION.OXIOUSANDENVIRONMENTALWEEDCONTROL )3". PDF Non-herbicide control methods ___________________ 13 HANDBOOKnAGUIDETOWEEDCONTROLINNON CROP Disclaimer AQUATICANDBUSHLANDSITUATION Herbicide control methods _______________________ 15 5SEOFTHEINFORMATIONINTHISHANDBOOKISATYOUROWNRISK0RIMARY s 4HE%NVIRONMENT0ROTECTION!UTHORITYFORTHEIR )NDUSTRIES2EGIONS3OUTH!USTRALIA "IOSECURITY3!ANDTHEIR