Analysis of Road Sprint Cycling Performance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Energy and Training Module ITU Competitive Coach
37 energy and training module ITU Competitive Coach Produced by the International Triathlon Union, 2007 38 39 energy & training Have you ever wondered why some athletes shoot off the start line while others take a moment to react? Have you every experienced a “burning” sensation in your muscles on the bike? Have athletes ever claimed they could ‘keep going forever!’? All of these situations involve the use of energy in the body. Any activity the body performs requires work and work requires energy. A molecule called ATP (adenosine triphosphate) is the “energy currency” of the body. ATP powers most cellular processes that require energy including muscle contraction required for sport performance. Where does ATP come from and how is it used? ATP is produced by the breakdown of fuel molecules—carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. During physical activity, three different processes work to split ATP molecules, which release energy for muscles to use in contraction, force production, and ultimately sport performance. These processes, or “energy systems”, act as pathways for the production of energy in sport. The intensity and duration of physical activity determines which pathway acts as the dominant fuel source. Immediate energy system Fuel sources ATP Sport E.g. carbohydrates, energy performance proteins, fats “currency” Short term energy system E.g. swimming, cycling, running, transitions Long term energy system During what parts of a triathlon might athletes use powerful, short, bursts of speed? 1 2 What duration, intensity, and type of activities in a triathlon cause muscles to “burn”? When in a triathlon do athletes have to perform an action repeatedly for longer than 10 or 15 3 minutes at a moderate pace? 40 energy systems Long Term (Aerobic) System The long term system produces energy through aerobic (with oxygen) pathways. -
Intro to Track Cycling
Introduction to Track Cycling What to Expect and How to Upgrade Photo: Snowy Mountain Photography Track cycling history ¨ Track racing dates back to the late 1800s and 6-day racing events Velodrome basics ¨ Velodromes can range from less than 200 meters to over 500 meters in length ¨ Wood, concrete, and asphalt 2012 London Olympic Velodrome are common surface materials ¨ Current Olympic velodrome standard is a wood indoor 250 meter velodrome with banking of around 45 degrees ¨ Ed Rudolph Velodrome (aka Northbrook) is a 382 meter asphalt velodrome with banking of around 20 degrees Ed Rudolph Velodrome What are the colored lines on the track? ¨ The ”blue band” or “cote d’azur” marks the track’s inside boundary. Racers may not ride on or below this band. The area below the blue band extending to the grass is called the “apron.” ¨ The black “measurement line” is used to measure the distance around the track. When doing pursuits or time trials, use this line as a guide. ¨ The red “sprinter’s line” defines the border of the sprint lane. The leading rider in this lane is said to “own the lane” and may only be passed by a rider going over on the right. NO PASSING BELOW RIDERS IN THE SPRINTERS LANE. Additionally once a sprint is engaged, a racer who is leading and in the sprinter’s lane can not leave it. ¨ The uppermost blue line is the “stayer’s line” or the relief line. It marks the boundary between faster and slower traffic, with the faster riders below the line and the slower “relief” riders above the line. -
Shoes Approved by World Athletics - As at 01 October 2021
Shoes Approved by World Athletics - as at 01 October 2021 1. This list is primarily a list concerns shoes that which have been assessed by World Athletics to date. 2. The assessment and whether a shoe is approved or not is determined by several different factors as set out in Technical Rule 5. 3. The list is not a complete list of every shoe that has ever been worn by an athlete. If a shoe is not on the list, it can be because a manufacturer has failed to submit the shoe, it has not been approved or is an old model / shoe. Any shoe from before 1 January 2016 is deemed to meet the technical requirements of Technical Rule 5 and does not need to be approved unless requested This deemed approval does not prejudice the rights of World Athletics or Referees set out in the Rules and Regulations. 4. Any shoe in the list highlighted in blue is a development shoe to be worn only by specific athletes at specific competitions within the period stated. NON-SPIKE SHOES Shoe Company Model Track up to 800m* Track from 800m HJ, PV, LJ, SP, DT, HT, JT TJ Road* Cross-C Development Shoe *not including 800m *incl. track RW start date end date ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 40mm ≤ 25mm 361 Degrees Flame NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios 3 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 4 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 5 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 6 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios Pro NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 2 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 8 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 9 NO NO NO -
Gender Difference in Cycling Speed and Age of Winning Performers in Ultra-Cycling - the 508-Mile ”Furnace Creek” from 1983 to 2012
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Gender difference in cycling speed and age of winning performers in ultra-cycling - the 508-mile ”Furnace Creek” from 1983 to 2012 Rüst, Christoph Alexander ; Rosemann, Thomas ; Lepers, Romuald ; Knechtle, Beat Abstract: We analysed (i) the gender difference in cycling speed and (ii) the age of winning performers in the 508-mile ”Furnace Creek 508”. Changes in cycling speeds and gender differences from 1983 to 2012 were analysed using linear, non-linear and hierarchical multi-level regression analyses for the annual three fastest women and men. Cycling speed increased non-linearly in men from 14.6 (s = 0.3) km · h(-1) (1983) to 27.1 (s = 0.7) km · h(-1) (2012) and non-linearly in women from 11.0 (s = 0.3) km · h(-1) (1984) to 24.2 (s = 0.2) km · h(-1) (2012). The gender difference in cycling speed decreased linearly from 26.2 (s = 0.5)% (1984) to 10.7 (s = 1.9)% (2012). The age of winning performers increased from 26 (s = 2) years (1984) to 43 (s = 11) years (2012) in women and from 33 (s = 6) years (1983) to 50 (s = 5) years (2012) in men. To summarise, these results suggest that (i) women will be able to narrow the gender gap in cycling speed in the near future in an ultra-endurance cycling race such as the ”Furnace Creek 508” due to the linear decrease in gender difference and (ii) the maturity of these athletes has changed during the last three decades where winning performers become older and faster across years. -
Using Field Based Data to Model Sprint Track Cycling Performance Hamish A
Ferguson et al. Sports Medicine - Open (2021) 7:20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00310-0 REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Using Field Based Data to Model Sprint Track Cycling Performance Hamish A. Ferguson1* , Chris Harnish2 and J. Geoffrey Chase1 Abstract Cycling performance models are used to study rider and sport characteristics to better understand performance determinants and optimise competition outcomes. Performance requirements cover the demands of competition a cyclist may encounter, whilst rider attributes are physical, technical and psychological characteristics contributing to performance. Several current models of endurance-cycling enhance understanding of performance in road cycling and track endurance, relying on a supply and demand perspective. However, they have yet to be developed for sprint-cycling, with current athlete preparation, instead relying on measures of peak-power, speed and strength to assess performance and guide training. Peak-power models do not adequately explain the demands of actual competition in events over 15-60 s, let alone, in World-Championship sprint cycling events comprising several rounds to medal finals. Whilst there are no descriptive studies of track-sprint cycling events, we present data from physiological interventions using track cycling and repeated sprint exercise research in multiple sports, to elucidate the demands of performance requiring several maximal sprints over a competition. This review will show physiological and power meter data, illustrating the role of all energy pathways in sprint performance. This understanding highlights the need to focus on the capacity required for a given race and over an event, and therefore the recovery needed for each subsequent race, within and between races, and how optimal pacing can be used to enhance performance. -
BICYCLE RACING Road Racing - TOUR DE FRANCE BIGGIST, HARDEST and MOST PRESTEGIOUS BIKE RACE in the WORLD • 21 DAYS • 2000+ MILES • SINCE 1903
BICYCLE RACING Road racing - TOUR DE FRANCE BIGGIST, HARDEST AND MOST PRESTEGIOUS BIKE RACE IN THE WORLD • 21 DAYS • 2000+ MILES • SINCE 1903 Each year the course changes • 20 Stages Regular road stage (mass start - 16) Team time trial (1) Individual time trial (3) • Lowest overall time wins • Race is a team competition Peloton (pack) – mass start stage race INDIVIDIAL TIME TRIAL • Start 1 racer at the time with 2 min intervals • no drafting allowed • special aerodynamic bike, suite and helmet TEAM TIME TRIAL AERODYNAMICS AERODYNAMIC DRAG • Air pressure drag • Direct friction Rider can safe up to 40% of energy by drafting behind other riders Mountain bike racing Cyclo-cross The original two cycling disciplines – Road race and Track cycling – were included in the first Olympic Games of modern times in Athens in 1896 Olympic medallists Olympic medallists Gold Medallists in the 2000 Olympic Games Gold Medallists in the 2000 Olympic Games Cycling Road Cycling Road Event Athletes Event Athlete Individual Time Men Jan Ullrich, (Germany) s Trial Women Leontien Van Moorsel (Netherlands) Individ Men Jan Ullrich, (Germany) Leontien Van Moorsel (Netherlands) ual IndividualWomen Men Viacheslav Ekimov (Russia) Road Race Time Women Leontien Van Moorsel Trial (Netherlands) Individ Men Viacheslav Ekimov (Russia) ual Women Leontien Van Moorsel (Netherlands) Road Race Track Cycling Event Athletes 1km Individual Men Jason Queally (Great Britain) Time Trial 500m Individual Women Felicia Ballanger (France) Time Trial Men Marty Nothstein (USA) Sprint Women -
Olympic Sprint, Or Team Sprint
Spectators Summary of Track Cycling Events: (See the USCF rule book or http://www.usacycling.org/ for all the details.) Mass Start or "Scratch" Race: Not surprisingly, all the riders in a Mass Start race start at the same time. The riders all cover the same distance, with the winner being the first rider to cross the finish line at the end of that distance. Although speed is important, tactics and teamwork are equally vital. Groups of riders often take an early lead, and then work together to increase it while their teammates try to block and slow down the "field." On a small track, the leaders may gain an entire lap on the other riders and then join in with the main group again. Points Race: A variation of the Mass Start race, points are awarded to the top placing riders in a series of sprints contested at various intervals during the race. The winner of a Points Race is not necessarily the first to cross the finish line, but rather the rider who has accumulated the most points during the race. Win-And-Out: A variation on the Scratch race where 1st place is decided on the final lap, however, only the winner is finished. In order to secure 2nd place that rider must be first across the line on the next lap. 3rd place is decided on the lap after that. Typically all other places are also decided by this third and final sprint. This makes for interesting tactics. It can be a very hard race if a rider tries gives their all to win only to be forced to continue and try again the next lap. -
The International Ski Competition Rules (Icr)
THE INTERNATIONAL SKI COMPETITION RULES (ICR) BOOK II CROSS-COUNTRY APPROVED BY THE 51ST INTERNATIONAL SKI CONGRESS, COSTA NAVARINO (GRE) EDITION MAY 2018 INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE SKI INTERNATIONALER SKI VERBAND Blochstrasse 2; CH- 3653 Oberhofen / Thunersee; Switzerland Telephone: +41 (33) 244 61 61 Fax: +41 (33) 244 61 71 Website: www.fis-ski.com ________________________________________________________________________ All rights reserved. Copyright: International Ski Federation FIS, Oberhofen, Switzerland, 2018. Oberhofen, May 2018 Table of Contents 1st Section 200 Joint Regulations for all Competitions ................................................... 3 201 Classification and Types of Competitions ................................................... 3 202 FIS Calendar .............................................................................................. 5 203 Licence to participate in FIS Races (FIS Licence) ...................................... 7 204 Qualification of Competitors ....................................................................... 8 205 Competitors Obligations and Rights ........................................................... 9 206 Advertising and Sponsorship .................................................................... 10 207 Competition Equipment and Commercial Markings .................................. 12 208 Exploitation of Electronic Media Rights .................................................... 13 209 Film Rights .............................................................................................. -
Artistic Swimming
ARTISTIC SWIMMING EVENTS Women (3) Duets Teams Highlight Mixed (1) Duets QUOTA Qualification Host NOC Total Men 7 1 8 Women 64 8 72 Total 71 9 80 athletes MAXIMUM QUOTA PER NOC EVENT Qualification Host NOC Total Duets 1 duet (2 athletes) 1 duet (2 athletes) 12 duets of 2 athletes Teams 1 team (8 athletes) 1 team (8 athletes) 8 teams of 8 athletes Highlight 1 team (8 athletes) 1 team (8 athletes) 8 teams of 8 athletes Mixed Duets 1 duet (2 athletes) 1 duet (2 athletes) 8 Duets of 2 athletes Total 9 athletes (8 women + 1 man) 9 athletes (8 women + 1 man) 80 athletes (72 women + 8 men) Athletes may register for more than one event. Eight teams with a maximum of 8 (eight) athletes each may participate in the team and highlight competition (no reserves will be allowed). Eight duets with a maximum of 2(two) athletes (one man and one woman) each may participate in the mixed duet competition (no reserves will be allowed). Twelve teams with a maximum of 24 athletes (no reserves will be allowed) may participate in the duet competition. As Host Country, Colombia automatically will qualify one team in each event, with a maximum of 9 athletes (8 women and 1 man). Athlete eligibility The athletes must have signed and submitted the Athlete Eligibility Condition Form. Only NOCs recognized by Panam Sports whose national swimming federations are affiliated with the International Swimming Federation (FINA) and the Union Americana de Natación (UANA) may enter athletes in the Cali 2021 Junior Pan American Games. -
A Parent's Guide to Cross-Country
A Parent's Guide to Cross-Country What is cross-country? Cross-country is a team running sport that takes place in the fall on a measured 5000 meter (3.1 miles) High School course or 2 mile course for the Jr. High over varied surfaces and terrain. Our home course is located in City Park on the levee near Troy Memorial Stadium and Hobart Arena. How is cross-country scored? A cross-country meet is scored by adding up the places of the top 5 finishers for each team. As in golf, the low score wins. For example, a team that scores 26 points places ahead of a team that scores 29 points, as follows: Troy Piqua 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 9 Totals: 26 pts 29pts Troy Wins A team's 6th and 7th finishers can also figure in the scoring if they place ahead of other teams' top 5 finishers. When that is the case, they become "pushers" by pushing up their opponents' scores, as follows: Troy Piqua 2 1 3 4 6 5 8 7 9 (10)(11) 12 Totals: 28 pts 29 pts Troy Wins Only a team's 6th and 7th finishers can be pushers, regardless of how many of its runners may finish ahead of an opposing team's top 5 finishers. This is also known as displacing another team's scoring runner(s). This is why the 6th and 7th runners are just as important as the top 5. What happens in case of a scoring tie? If a tie in scoring occurs, then the team who has their 6th runner in first wins. -
Maximal Time Spent at Vo2max from Sprint to the Marathon
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Maximal Time Spent at VO2max from Sprint to the Marathon Claire A. Molinari 1,2, Johnathan Edwards 3 and Véronique Billat 1,* 1 Unité de Biologie Intégrative des Adaptations à l’Exercice, Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France; [email protected] 2 BillaTraining SAS, 32 rue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94140 Alforville, France 3 Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Unité d’enseignement en Physiologie et Biomécanique du Mouvement, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)-786117308 Received: 6 November 2020; Accepted: 8 December 2020; Published: 10 December 2020 Abstract: Until recently, it was thought that maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was elicited only in middle-distance events and not the sprint or marathon distances. We tested the hypothesis that VO2max can be elicited in both the sprint and marathon distances and that the fraction of time spent at VO2max is not significantly different between distances. Methods: Seventy-eight well-trained males (mean [SD] age: 32 [13]; weight: 73 [9] kg; height: 1.80 [0.8] m) performed the University of Montreal Track Test using a portable respiratory gas sampling system to measure a baseline VO2max. Each participant ran one or two different distances (100 m, 200 m, 800 m, 1500 m, 3000 m, 10 km or marathon) in which they are specialists. Results: VO2max was elicited and sustained in all distances tested. The time limit (Tlim) at VO2max on a relative scale of the total time (Tlim at VO2max%Ttot) during the sprint, middle-distance, and 1500 m was not significantly different (p > 0.05). -
Track Cycling: an Analysis of the Pacing Strategies Employed During the Devil Elimination Race
Track cycling: An analysis of the pacing strategies employed during the devil elimination race Item Type Article Authors Gill, Kevin; Worsfold, Paul R.; White, Christopher Citation Gill, K. S., White, C., & Worsfold, P. R. (2014). Track cycling: An analysis of the pacing strategies employed during the devil elimination race. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 14(1), 330-344. Publisher Cardiff Metropolitan University Journal International Journal of Performance Analysis of Sport. Download date 30/09/2021 05:23:26 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/603510 Track cycling: An analysis of the pacing strategies employed during the devil elimination race Authors 1) Kevin. S. Gill - corresponding author. Affiliations- English Institute of Sport; University of Chester; Harlequins Rugby Union FC. Address: Harlequins Training Centre, Surrey Sports Park, Richard Meyjes Road, Guildford, GU2 7AD. Tel: 07850 716704. Email: [email protected] 2) Chris White. Affiliations- English Institute of Sport. Address: Senior Performance Analyst, English Institute of Sport, Sport City, Gate 13, Rowsley Street, Manchester, M11 3FF. Tel: 0870 759 0466. Email: [email protected] 3) Dr Paul. R. Worsfold. Affiliations- English Institute of Sport; University of Chester. Address: Head of Sports Biomechanics & Performance Analysis, University of Chester, Department of Sport & Exercise Sciences, Parkgate Road, Chester, CH1 4BJ. Tel: +44 (0)1244 513467. Email: [email protected] Abstract This study aimed to provide a description of the pacing requirements of the track cycling Elimination race, and to identify effective pacing strategies to maximise overall Omnium medal opportunity.