Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med: first published as 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000780 on 16 June 2020. Downloaded from Open access Protocol Enhanced injury prevention programme for recreational runners (the SPRINT study): design of a randomised controlled trial Tryntsje Fokkema ,1 Robert- Jan de Vos,2 Edwin Visser,3 Patrick Krastman,1,4 John IJzerman,5 Bart W Koes,1,6 Jan A N Verhaar,2 Sita M A Bierma- Zeinstra,1,2 Marienke van Middelkoop1 To cite: Fokkema T, ABSTRACT running one of the top three sports with the de Vos R- J, Visser E, et al. Introduction Running- related injuries (RRIs) are most reported injuries.3 More than half of Enhanced injury prevention frequent, but no effective injury prevention measures programme for recreational these RRIs required medical treatment. Also runners (the SPRINT study): have been identified yet. Therefore, we have set up the the number of RRIs per 1000 training hours design of a randomised INSPIRE trial in 2017, in which the effectiveness of an is high. In 2018, there were 6.3 injuries per online injury prevention programme was tested. Although controlled trial. BMJ Open 1000 training hours in running compared Sport & Exercise Medicine this programme was not effective in reducing the number 2020;6:e000780. doi:10.1136/ with 3.4 injuries per 1000 training hours of all of RRIs, we gained new insights from this study, which 3 bmjsem-2020-000780 we used to design an enhanced, online multidisciplinary sports together. These numbers emphasise injury prevention programme. The aim of this study is to the need for injury prevention in recreational runners. Accepted 24 May 2020 test the effectiveness of this enhanced injury prevention programme in a group of recreational runners. Risk factors for RRIs were assessed in Methods and analysis For this randomised controlled multiple studies. A large variety of risk factors by copyright. trial, we aim to include 3394 recreational runners aged 18 were identified in the past decades (eg, over- years or older who register for a running event (distances weight, previous injuries and a high weekly 10 to 42.2 km). During the preparation for the running running distance).4 5 This indicates that the event, runners in the intervention group get access to the cause of RRIs is multifactorial. However, enhanced online injury prevention programme. This online most prevention studies focussed on modi- programme consists of 10 steps, all covering separate 6–8 © Author(s) (or their items of RRI prevention. Runners in the control group fying one single risk factor for RRIs. For employer(s)) 2020. Re- use will follow their regular preparation. With three follow- up example, Bredeweg et al performed an permitted under CC BY. questionnaires (1 month before, 1 week before and 1 month randomised controlled trial (RCT) aiming at Published by BMJ. http://bmjopensem.bmj.com/ after the running event), the proportions of self- reported 1 the risk factor ‘no previous experience with Department of General Practice, RRIs in the intervention group and the control group are sporting activities with axial loading’ and Erasmus MC Medical University compared. Center, Rotterdam, The offered novice runners a preconditioning 9 Netherlands Ethics and dissemination An exemption for a programme. No effect on the number of 2Department of Orthopaedics, comprehensive application has been obtained by the RRIs was found. Also in other RCTs on RRI Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus MC University Erasmus MC Medical University prevention in which one risk factor for RRIs Center, Rotterdam, The Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The results Netherlands of the study will be disseminated among the running (eg, increasing training load too fast or 3Department of Physiotherapy, population, published in peer- reviewed international performing no warming- up) was targeted, no 6 8 Sport Medical Center journals and presented on international conferences. effect on the number of RRIs was found. We 'Sportgeneeskunde Rotterdam', Trial registration number NL7694 hypothesised that this ineffectiveness may be on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected Rotterdam, The Netherlands due to the fact that these studies targeted only 4Rotterdam Marathon Study Group, Rotterdam, The one single risk factor for RRIs, while the cause Netherlands of RRIs seems to be multifactorial. There- 5Dutch Athletic Federation, INTRODUCTION fore, we have set up the INSPIRE trial in Arnhem, The Netherlands 2017, a randomised controlled trial in which 6 Running is a popular sport. In the Nether- Center for Muscle and Joint lands, it is practiced by over 2 million people we tested the effectiveness of a multifacto- Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (approximately 12.5% of the Dutch popula- rial online injury prevention programme in tion).1 Running has many positive effects on 2378 recreational runners.10 This programme both physical and mental health.2 However, consisted of information on evidence- based Correspondence to Dr Marienke van Middelkoop; the injury rates in running are high. In 2018, risk factors for RRIs and advices to reduce m. vanmiddelkoop@ erasmusmc. there were 750 000 running-related injuries injury risk. However, with an injury propor- nl (RRIs) in the Netherlands, which makes tion of 37.5% in the intervention group Fokkema T, et al. BMJ Open Sp Ex Med 2020;6:e000780. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000780 1 BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med: first published as 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000780 on 16 June 2020. Downloaded from Open access and 36.7% in the control group, this programme was not effective in reducing the number of RRIs (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.29).11 Although the injury prevention programme of the INSPIRE trial was not effective, some interesting and new insights were gained.11 For example, it appeared that the multifactorial online prevention programme seemed to have a negative effect on the occurrence of RRIs in runners with no injury history.11 Furthermore, the results showed that runners who applied the information from the biomechanics section of the prevention programme to their training seemed to have an increased injury risk compared with those who did not use this information.11 We assume this is the result of the advice on stride pattern. These findings indicate that research on RRI prevention should probably specifically aim at runners who had RRIs in the past. Moreover, advices on stride pattern should not be presented through a website, since this seems to Figure 1 Flowchart of the SPRINT (Shaping up have negative impact on injury occurrence. Probably Preventionfor Running Injuries in the Netherlands using changes to stride pattern should only be made under Tensteps) study. supervision of a trainer or physiotherapist.12 Participants of the INSPIRE trial indicated that ‘not knowing what to do’ was an important barrier for injury prevention and Participants the participants wished to integrate the injury prevention Potential participants are runners who register for the measures into their training sessions.13 This indicates following running events; DSW Bruggenloop Rotterdam that injury prevention advices should be directive and 2019 (15 km), Nacht van Groningen 2020 (10, 16.1 personalised. and 21.1 km), NN CPC Loop The Hague 2020 (10 and by copyright. Therefore, we designed an enhanced, online multi- 21.1 km) and NN Marathon Rotterdam 2020 (10.55 and disciplinary injury prevention programme entitled 42.195 km). On the online registration forms of these ‘10 steps 2 outrun injuries’. The primary aim of this running events a question is included, in which the study is to test the effectiveness of this injury preven- runners are asked whether they are interested in partic- ipating in a research project on the prevention of RRIs. tion programme on the number of RRIs in recreational Contact information of interested runners is send to the runners. researchers, who will subsequently send more informa- tion about the study to these runners. Runners who are METHODS still interested in participation are asked to provide elec- http://bmjopensem.bmj.com/ Study design tronic informed consent and can immediately fill out the The Shaping up Prevention for Running Injuries in the baseline questionnaire. Netherlands using Ten steps (SPRINT) study is a RCT Only runners aged 18 years or older who register in recreational runners who are participating in running for one of the aforementioned five running events events in the Netherlands. Half of the participants can participate in the SPRINT study. Exclusion criteria of the SPRINT study will get access to the prevention include participation in our previous trial on RRI preven- programme during the preparation for a running event, tion (INSPIRE trial), registration for the running event while the other half of the participants will follow their less than 2 months before the event, no access to internet and/or email and no proper knowledge of the Dutch regular preparation for the event. The preparations on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected language. For runners who register for multiple running for the SPRINT study started in December 2018 and in events, only the first registration is taken into account. August 2019 the first participants are included. The data collection is finalised in May 2020 and the first results are Randomisation expected by the end of 2020. The flowchart of the design After completing the baseline questionnaire, the partici- is shown in figure 1. pants are randomised into either the intervention group The SPRINT study is funded by the Netherlands Organ- or the control group. The randomisation is performed isation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, in Microsoft Access with a block size of 40. The randomi- grant number 50-53600-98-104), and is performed in sation table is generated by an individual from outside collaboration with the Rotterdam Marathon Study Group the research group and this table is not accessible for of Golazo Sports, the organiser of large running events the researchers during the inclusion and data collection.
Recommended publications
  • Energy and Training Module ITU Competitive Coach
    37 energy and training module ITU Competitive Coach Produced by the International Triathlon Union, 2007 38 39 energy & training Have you ever wondered why some athletes shoot off the start line while others take a moment to react? Have you every experienced a “burning” sensation in your muscles on the bike? Have athletes ever claimed they could ‘keep going forever!’? All of these situations involve the use of energy in the body. Any activity the body performs requires work and work requires energy. A molecule called ATP (adenosine triphosphate) is the “energy currency” of the body. ATP powers most cellular processes that require energy including muscle contraction required for sport performance. Where does ATP come from and how is it used? ATP is produced by the breakdown of fuel molecules—carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. During physical activity, three different processes work to split ATP molecules, which release energy for muscles to use in contraction, force production, and ultimately sport performance. These processes, or “energy systems”, act as pathways for the production of energy in sport. The intensity and duration of physical activity determines which pathway acts as the dominant fuel source. Immediate energy system Fuel sources ATP Sport E.g. carbohydrates, energy performance proteins, fats “currency” Short term energy system E.g. swimming, cycling, running, transitions Long term energy system During what parts of a triathlon might athletes use powerful, short, bursts of speed? 1 2 What duration, intensity, and type of activities in a triathlon cause muscles to “burn”? When in a triathlon do athletes have to perform an action repeatedly for longer than 10 or 15 3 minutes at a moderate pace? 40 energy systems Long Term (Aerobic) System The long term system produces energy through aerobic (with oxygen) pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoes Approved by World Athletics - As at 01 October 2021
    Shoes Approved by World Athletics - as at 01 October 2021 1. This list is primarily a list concerns shoes that which have been assessed by World Athletics to date. 2. The assessment and whether a shoe is approved or not is determined by several different factors as set out in Technical Rule 5. 3. The list is not a complete list of every shoe that has ever been worn by an athlete. If a shoe is not on the list, it can be because a manufacturer has failed to submit the shoe, it has not been approved or is an old model / shoe. Any shoe from before 1 January 2016 is deemed to meet the technical requirements of Technical Rule 5 and does not need to be approved unless requested This deemed approval does not prejudice the rights of World Athletics or Referees set out in the Rules and Regulations. 4. Any shoe in the list highlighted in blue is a development shoe to be worn only by specific athletes at specific competitions within the period stated. NON-SPIKE SHOES Shoe Company Model Track up to 800m* Track from 800m HJ, PV, LJ, SP, DT, HT, JT TJ Road* Cross-C Development Shoe *not including 800m *incl. track RW start date end date ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 20mm ≤ 25mm ≤ 40mm ≤ 25mm 361 Degrees Flame NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios 3 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 4 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 5 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios 6 NO YES NO YES YES YES Adidas Adizero Adios Pro NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Adios Pro 2 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 8 NO NO NO NOYES NO Adidas Adizero Boston 9 NO NO NO
    [Show full text]
  • The International Ski Competition Rules (Icr)
    THE INTERNATIONAL SKI COMPETITION RULES (ICR) BOOK II CROSS-COUNTRY APPROVED BY THE 51ST INTERNATIONAL SKI CONGRESS, COSTA NAVARINO (GRE) EDITION MAY 2018 INTERNATIONAL SKI FEDERATION FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE SKI INTERNATIONALER SKI VERBAND Blochstrasse 2; CH- 3653 Oberhofen / Thunersee; Switzerland Telephone: +41 (33) 244 61 61 Fax: +41 (33) 244 61 71 Website: www.fis-ski.com ________________________________________________________________________ All rights reserved. Copyright: International Ski Federation FIS, Oberhofen, Switzerland, 2018. Oberhofen, May 2018 Table of Contents 1st Section 200 Joint Regulations for all Competitions ................................................... 3 201 Classification and Types of Competitions ................................................... 3 202 FIS Calendar .............................................................................................. 5 203 Licence to participate in FIS Races (FIS Licence) ...................................... 7 204 Qualification of Competitors ....................................................................... 8 205 Competitors Obligations and Rights ........................................................... 9 206 Advertising and Sponsorship .................................................................... 10 207 Competition Equipment and Commercial Markings .................................. 12 208 Exploitation of Electronic Media Rights .................................................... 13 209 Film Rights ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Parent's Guide to Cross-Country
    A Parent's Guide to Cross-Country What is cross-country? Cross-country is a team running sport that takes place in the fall on a measured 5000 meter (3.1 miles) High School course or 2 mile course for the Jr. High over varied surfaces and terrain. Our home course is located in City Park on the levee near Troy Memorial Stadium and Hobart Arena. How is cross-country scored? A cross-country meet is scored by adding up the places of the top 5 finishers for each team. As in golf, the low score wins. For example, a team that scores 26 points places ahead of a team that scores 29 points, as follows: Troy Piqua 1 2 4 3 5 7 6 8 10 9 Totals: 26 pts 29pts Troy Wins A team's 6th and 7th finishers can also figure in the scoring if they place ahead of other teams' top 5 finishers. When that is the case, they become "pushers" by pushing up their opponents' scores, as follows: Troy Piqua 2 1 3 4 6 5 8 7 9 (10)(11) 12 Totals: 28 pts 29 pts Troy Wins Only a team's 6th and 7th finishers can be pushers, regardless of how many of its runners may finish ahead of an opposing team's top 5 finishers. This is also known as displacing another team's scoring runner(s). This is why the 6th and 7th runners are just as important as the top 5. What happens in case of a scoring tie? If a tie in scoring occurs, then the team who has their 6th runner in first wins.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximal Time Spent at Vo2max from Sprint to the Marathon
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Maximal Time Spent at VO2max from Sprint to the Marathon Claire A. Molinari 1,2, Johnathan Edwards 3 and Véronique Billat 1,* 1 Unité de Biologie Intégrative des Adaptations à l’Exercice, Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France; [email protected] 2 BillaTraining SAS, 32 rue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94140 Alforville, France 3 Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Unité d’enseignement en Physiologie et Biomécanique du Mouvement, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)-786117308 Received: 6 November 2020; Accepted: 8 December 2020; Published: 10 December 2020 Abstract: Until recently, it was thought that maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was elicited only in middle-distance events and not the sprint or marathon distances. We tested the hypothesis that VO2max can be elicited in both the sprint and marathon distances and that the fraction of time spent at VO2max is not significantly different between distances. Methods: Seventy-eight well-trained males (mean [SD] age: 32 [13]; weight: 73 [9] kg; height: 1.80 [0.8] m) performed the University of Montreal Track Test using a portable respiratory gas sampling system to measure a baseline VO2max. Each participant ran one or two different distances (100 m, 200 m, 800 m, 1500 m, 3000 m, 10 km or marathon) in which they are specialists. Results: VO2max was elicited and sustained in all distances tested. The time limit (Tlim) at VO2max on a relative scale of the total time (Tlim at VO2max%Ttot) during the sprint, middle-distance, and 1500 m was not significantly different (p > 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Strength, Power, and Sprint Acceleration in Division I Men’S Soccer Players Christopher Bellon East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2016 The Relationship Between Strength, Power, and Sprint Acceleration in Division I Men’s Soccer Players Christopher Bellon East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Exercise Physiology Commons, and the Kinesiology Commons Recommended Citation Bellon, Christopher, "The Relationship Between Strength, Power, and Sprint Acceleration in Division I Men’s Soccer Players" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3087. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3087 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Relationship Between Strength, Power, and Sprint Acceleration in Division I Men’s Soccer Players _____________________ A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Department of Exercise and Sport Science East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sport Physiology and Performance _____________________ by Christopher R. Bellon August 2016 _____________________ Brad H. DeWeese, EdD, Chair Kimitake Sato, PhD Kenneth P. Clark, PhD Michael H. Stone, PhD Keywords: Short-to-Long Approach, Speed, Rate of Force Development ABSTRACT The Relationship Between Strength, Power, and Sprint Acceleration in Division I Men’s Soccer Players by Christopher R. Bellon The purposes of this dissertation were three-fold. The first was to identify the approximate distances characterizing early-, mid-, and late-acceleration in a population of Division I men’s collegiate soccer players.
    [Show full text]
  • Race Walking Officiating Handbook
    Race Walking Officiating Handbook Revised October 2016 1 INDEX Introduction …………………………………………………….. 3 The Rules of Race Walking, Sources and Publication ………….. 4 USATF Rules of Competition – Race Walking ………………… 4, 5, 6 Race Walk Officials ……………………………………....…….. 6 General Rules ………………………………………...….……… 6, 7 Records …………………………………………...….………….. 7 Judging Race Walk Events …………………………...….……… 8, 9, 10. 11 How to Make Race Walking Judging Decisions ……………….. 11, 12, 13,14, 15 Recommended Judging Positions ………………………………. 16, 17, 18 Duties of the Chief Judge ………………………………………. 18, 19 Procedures for Making Race Walking Calls ……………………. 20 Red Card Collectors …………………………………………….. 20 Duties of the Recorder ………………………………………….. 21 Operating the Red Card Posting Board ………………………… 21, 22 Umpire Calls …………………………………………………… 22 Uniform …………………………………………………………. 22 Judging Philosophy & Practices ………………………………… 22, 23, 24 Appendix 1: Race Walk Judging Paddles ……………………….. 25 Appendix 2: Sample Red Card Posting Board ………………….. 26 Appendix 3: Race Walking Judge Certification Process ……….. 27 Appendix 4: Race Walking Judges Resources ………………….. 27 USATF Track & Field Race Walking Elected Committee………. 28 Other Race Walking Judging Persons …………………………… 28 IAAF Pit Lane Rule ……………………………………………… 29 2 ------INTRODUCTION----- Race walking is growing in popularity across the United States and throughout the world. Competent Race Walking Judges are necessary at all levels of competition. Race walking is a discipline included within the sport of Athletics, which includes track and field, race walking and long distance running. USA Track & Field (USATF) is the national governing body of the sport of Athletics in the United States. The USATF National Race Walking Committee is responsible for the development of this handbook. Specialized officials, called Race Walking Judges and Race Walking Officials, in addition to the other required competition officials work together to conduct events in the discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Men's USMS Long Distance All Americans
    2019 Men's USMS Long Distance All Americans Age Time or Group Gender Event First Name Last Name Age Club Abbr. USMS # Distance Records 35-39 M Sprint Distance OW Stephen Rouch 39 INDY 169M-ROUCH 0:21:28.00 40-44 M Sprint Distance OW Todd Lantry 44 OREG 379D-02619 0:26:02.00 45-49 M Sprint Distance OW Chad Hagedorn 47 PSM 369S-08195 0:23:03.00 50-54 M Sprint Distance OW Rob Allen 54 NEM 029W-01W95 0:21:24.00 55-59 M Sprint Distance OW Stuart Cromarty 55 NEM 0298-03437 0:21:08.00 60-64 M Sprint Distance OW Guy Davis 60 GBM 029-034PR 0:22:01.00 65-69 M Sprint Distance OW Scott Lautman 67 BWAQ 369B-02M55 0:26:49.00 70-74 M Sprint Distance OW Frank McElroy 71 GSM 079W-01YE4 0:26:50.00 75-79 M Sprint Distance OW Thomas Spence 75 O*H* 1897-01PFX 0:34:35.00 18-24 M Middle Distance OW Joby Bernstein 24 TOC 389A-09DD7 0:41:49.10 25-29 M Middle Distance OW Andrew Cosgarea 27 TOC 389J-0AYE4 0:40:08.90 30-34 M Middle Distance OW Chad La Tourette 31 TOC 389S-09H5H 0:40:11.05 35-39 M Middle Distance OW Quinn Fitzgerald 36 TOC 384W-03ZEB 0:43:39.95 40-44 M Middle Distance OW Trevor Gillis 44 LAMV 389B-03J54 0:40:36.00 45-49 M Middle Distance OW Nico Ghilardi 49 SMM 389Z-03F54 0:44:00.00 50-54 M Middle Distance OW Jorge Angel 52 TVM 3893-06M7G 0:44:41.65 55-59 M Middle Distance OW Jeff Erwin 55 SAWS 5997-01J0A 0:41:13.10 60-64 M Middle Distance OW Peter Guadagni 64 WCM 3898-03GFZ 0:48:02.20 65-69 M Middle Distance OW Doug Brockbank 66 OREG 379F-0269M 0:53:33.20 70-74 M Middle Distance OW Joel Wilson 71 CRUZ 389P-03EYR 0:48:13.95 75-79 M Middle Distance
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Week Conditioning Program-Grade 9 All Workouts Should Be Done Every-Other Day, Preceded by a Form-Running Workout As a Quick W
    6 Week Conditioning Program-Grade 9 All workouts should be done every-other day, preceded by a form-running workout as a quick warm-up- Warm-Up-Skill to be done for 15 yards, followed by 10 yard jog (2x)- High Knees Butt Kicks Skip Carioca Slide (L & R) Weeks 1 & 2- 2 Workouts each week- Day 1-Speed Workout- Day 2-Distance- 4-60 yard sprints 1 Mile Run 2-40 yard sprints 2-20 yard Sprint Weeks 3 & 4-3 Workouts each week- Day 1-Speed Workout- Day 2-Distance- 2-100 yard sprints 1 ½ mile run 4-60 yard sprints 4-40 yard sprints 2-20 yard sprints Day 3-25 yard Ladders (2x)- To be done all in one sprint- Sprint 5 yards, touch line, sprint back to start Sprint 10 yards, touch line, sprint back to start Sprint 15 yards, touch line, sprint back to start Sprint 20 yards, touch line, sprint back to start Sprint 25 yards, touch line, sprint back to start Weeks 5 & 6-3 Workouts each week- Day 1-Speed Workout- Day 2-Distance- 2-100 yard sprints 2 mile run 4-60 yard sprints 4-40 yard sprints 2-20 yard sprints Day 3-Integrated- 8 Minute run consisting of-Jogging the length of field, sprinting width of end-zone as many times as possible for 8 minutes Strength Home Workout-Grade 9 Perform all body weight exercises 3 non-consecutive days a week with a minimum of 12- 15 repetitions for 3 sets. Exercise- Push-ups (Chest, Deltoids, Triceps)-Keep butt down and body straight, lower until nose is 3 inches off of floor, raise until arms are straight Lunge (Quadriceps, Gluteals)-Start with feet together, take a step that is a little bit bigger than a normal step with one foot, lower until back knee is an inch off of floor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sprint Hurdles
    Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 The 3 Golden Rules ............................................................................................................................... 3 The 100 Vs 110 Hurdles .......................................................................................................................... 4 Terminology ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Hurdle Styles ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Coaching New Hurdlers ........................................................................................................................ 8 Pre-requisites for Hurdling ............................................................................................................... 8 Training for the Sprint Hurdles ........................................................................................................... 12 Rhythm Training .................................................................................................................................. 13 Speed Training ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Strength Training ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Baton Exchange in the Sprint Relay
    Efficient baton exchange [h$^ ©bylAAF in the sprint relay 11:2-3:77-84, 1996 by Georges Maisetti U It is essential to consider relay racing as a 1 Introduction team event The regular, conscientious practice When talking about the sprint relays in France, of the French relay team, initiated by Joseph it is more exact to speak of 'tradition' and 'spirit', Maigrot and continued by successive coaches up rather than 'school'. to the author's period in charge of the men's 4 X 100 metres team, has evoked at team spirit In fact, for several decades, our sprinters have and camaraderie that has enabled the French to shown, paradoxically, that, within the individual achieve great success in the last few years. sport of athletics, relay racing is a team sport. The explanation for this is that our athletes have Statistics are given to show how the French always shown themselves willing to apply them­ team has consistently beaten other national selves regularly to group work. relay teams, composed of faster runners but with a less effective baton exchange technique. The founder of this tradition was a great French coach, Joseph Maigrot, who was able to The three comnwnly used methods of handing prove that, through hard work, we could com­ over the baton are explained and evaluated, and pete with the best in the world. it is shown how the method selected by the French team is actually more effective in main­ Thus, the French relay team came third in the taining baton speed than the other methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Start Position, Initial Step Type, and Usage of a Focal Point on Sprinting Performance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by TopSCHOLAR Original Research The Influence of Start Position, Initial Step Type, and Usage of a Focal Point on Sprinting Performance JENNIFER L. DYSTERHEFT†1, WILLIAM J. LEWINSKI‡2, DAWN A. SEEFELDT‡2, and ROBER W. PETTITT‡1 1Minnesota State University, Human Performance Lab, 1400 Highland Center, Mankato, MN, USA 2Force Science® Institute, 124 E Walnut Street Suite 120, Mankato, MN, USA †Denotes graduate student author, ‡Denotes professional author ABSTRACT International Journal of Exercise Science 6(4) : 320-327, 2013. For many athletes, sprinting acceleration is vital to sport performance. The purpose of this study was to observe the influences of starting position, type of initial step taken, and a focal point on sprinting velocity, stride length, and acceleration over a 9.1 m distance. Two trials of four conditions were video recorded in which subjects had no focal point (n = 10) or a lateral focal point (n = 9). The four conditions were: forwards (control), backwards, 90° left (90°L), and 90° right (90°R). Lower velocities (p > 0.05) were observed with focal point usage from the 90°R and 90°L starting positions. Four initial steps were observed during the forwards, 90°L, and 90°R conditions: backwards step, anterior tilt with forward step, pivot-crossover step, and lateral side step. The use of a backwards step resulted in an increased velocity (+0.80 m·s-1, p < 0.01) for the 90° turn trials and increased acceleration (+ 0.37 m·s-2, p < 0.01).
    [Show full text]