DOCSLIB.ORG

The Crusades and the Kingdom of Jerusalem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Crusades and the Kingdom of Jerusalem Onward Christian Soldiers 1 Onward Christian Soldiers The Crusades and The Kingdom of Jerusalem Rules for The Second Crusade; 1148 & The Third Crusade; 1191-1192 a Richard H. Berg Game Design Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................ 2 9. Naval Rules ................................................................ 20 2. Components ............................................................... 2 10. Resources and Communication ................................. 22 3. General Course of Play .............................................. 4 11. Neutrals and Assassins ............................................... 22 4. The Activation Markers (2C/3C only) ....................... 5 12. Events ......................................................................... 23 5. Leaders and Manpower .............................................. 5 Scenario 1: The Second Crusade ....................................... 24 6. Land Movement, Continuation, and Attrition ............ 7 Scenario 2: The Third Crusade (Historical) ...................... 26 7. Land Combat.............................................................. 10 The Third Crusade: Barbarossa (What if?) ....................... 29 8. Towns, Cities, and Castles ......................................... 15 Counterscan (sheet 3) ........................................................ 31 GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com © 2006 GMT Games, LLC 2 Onward Christian Soldiers The Towns and Cities are all named, as are the locations for the place- (1.0) INTRODUCTION ment of Castles; the Points are numbered for easy identification. Onward Christian Soldiers is a game covering the first three Cru- sades to “The Holy Land”. These rules cover the Second and Third The coastal areas of the Eastern Mediterranean are divided into Sea Crusades, campaigns to aid The Kingdom of Jerusalem in main- Zones, to delineate movement of galley fleets. Sea Zones are taining Frankish control over the Latin East (more or less). “named” by reference to a Port in that area; e.g., Acre Sea Zone, or Cyprus Sea Zone. (1.1) The Two Versions of Onward There are also several edge-of-the-map holding areas for soon-to- Rules that apply specifically to a given scenario are either noted in arrive units from such as the Fatimids, the Turks, etc. the main body, or given in that scenario. While the map shows much of the actual terrain in the region, such There are two “versions” of Onward: The First Crusade and the Sec- terrain has no effect on play. It is there solely to provide a geo- ond/Third Crusades. Several rules in the First Crusade version are graphical context for players as they work their way from place to essentially identical with those in the Second/Third Crusade version, place. with only small differences, but for the sake of player convenience, we have decided to present the game in two completely separate (2.2) THE CARDS rulebooks. Even so, in some cases the rules show either [1C] or [2C/ None of the cards are used for the Second or Third Crusades. 3C]. The former refers to a rule that applies only to the First Crusade version, the latter to the Second/Third Crusade version. These notifi- (2.3) THE PLAYING PIECES cations help players quickly grasp the differences between the two The playing pieces—cardboard markers—are used to locate where versions. each of that type of unit is at any given time, or keep track of certain That said, there really aren’t that many differences between the two, statuses. For example, Army Strength Point markers are provided and players will be able to move from one version to the other to show how many troops a given Leader has in his Army. There are smoothly and easily. The major differences are as follows: also Control Markers to keep track of who controls a specific City, and Resource Point markers to show how much a City’s Resources • The First Crusade uses the Event Cards; the Second/Third Cru- have been reduced. sade does not, using an Events Table instead • The First Crusade uses the Activation Cards; the Second/Third Leaders Crusade uses a simpler Activation Markers system Rank Name • The First Crusade can be played by anywhere from two through Scenario Faction seven players, and includes specific multi-player rules through- Activation Rating Command Rating out, as well as a Diplomacy section; the Second/Third Cru- sades are two-player games only. (But both can easily be played Fleets solitaire.) Movement Rate (2.0) COMPONENTS Fleet Strength Onward Christian Soldiers: The Second and Third Crusades uses Activation Markers • 1 22"x 33" game-map • 2 sheets of 1/2" cardboard playing pieces • 1 sheet of 5/8" cardboard control markers • 1 sheet of 1/2" game markers • 1 Rules Book • 4 Player Charts and Aids Cards Strength Points • 2 six-sided dice (2.1) THE MAP The 22" x 33" mapboard covers the area of The Middle East—or The Holy Land—as it was during the 11th to 12th centuries. Most of The Holy Land was difficult to traverse by armies, with the small, but tough, mountain ranges channeling traffic into specific paths, Control Markers those paths usually guarded by cities and fortifications of different size and strength. Towns are large circles, Cities are squares. The paths also include small circles (Points) with numbers therein rep- resenting Attrition costs, not Movement Points. England France Germany Latin Cities Towns Points Fatamid Saracen Armenia © 2006 GMT Games, LLC Onward Christian Soldiers 3 (2.4) THE DICE Battle: Combat between two forces. There are two types: Full Onward Christian Soldiers uses six-sided dice. Sometimes only one Battles, in which armies fight each other toe-to-toe, and Harass- die is used (1d6). At other times players roll two dice and add the ment Attacks, in which Muslim/Saracen forces try to cause small numbers together (2d6). At still other times, both dice are rolled, losses to the Crusader/Frank forces at low risk to themselves. with the two numbers combined (2d66) to form a double-digit num- Campaign Rating: The number on the right of each Leader counter. ber, with the red die read first and the white die second. For in- stance, rolling a red 4 and a white 2 yields a result of 42. Cities: The squares on the map. Spaces with large circles are Towns, not Cities. (2.5) GAME TERMINOLOGY AND HISTORICAL NOTE: Most of these “cities” were hardly that ... ACRONYMS more collections of a few buildings than anything else. The big The following terms and acronyms are used throughout the rules. cities, such as Antioch, were quite big for that era. Antioch was one of the largest cities in the Western world at that time. 1C: First Crusade version of Onward Christian Soldiers (OCS). 2C/3C: Second/Third Crusade version of OCS. City Entry Space: The space to which the City is connected. Each city has only one City Entry space. ASP: Army Strength Points, a generic way of indicating the strength of an Army. Control: The last faction to solely occupy a City, Town, or Castle controls it. Activated: A Leader is considered activated when his Activation Marker is drawn (although it’s possible to draw the marker and pass DR: Acronym for die-roll (also spelled dieroll without the hyphen the Activation). All Crusader Fleets are considered activated when here). A DRM is a die-roll modifier, a number used to adjust the the Crusader Fleet Activation card is drawn; Fatimid Fleets can ac- die-roll. tivate only on the play of the “Fatimids” Muslim Event Card [1C Entry Space: Same as City Entry Space. only]. An Army is activated when an activated Leader does some- thing with them. Event Deck (1C only): The card deck that determines random events. Players take cards from the Event Deck only after drawing Activation Card (1C only): Cards that currently form—or that may one of the “Draw Event Card” cards from the current turn’s Activa- be purchased to form—the Activation Deck, and drawn from the tion Deck. See 4.0. deck during the Operations Phase to determine which leader or force goes next. Faction: The essentially separate armies of each side (Franks or Saracens). Activation Deck (1C only): The card deck that controls the order in which armies and fleets move during the turn. It consists of the Force: Army, Garrison, or Leaderless ASPs. Leader Activation Cards purchased for the current turn, plus the Garrison: Leaderless ASPs in a City or Town. See also Intrinsic Standard Activation cards automatically included with every turn. Garrison. The Activation Deck is assembled anew at the beginning of every turn. See 4.0. Interception: Stopping an army as it moves, engaging it in battle. Activation Points Marker (1C only): Markers drawn randomly Intrinsic Garrison: 1-ASP force inside a City or Castle. All Cities by the player(s), at the beginning of each turn, in order to determine or Castles automatically have an Intrinsic Garrison at all times; if which of each faction’s Leader Activation Cards will be added to the current one is destroyed, it is automatically and immediately the Activation Deck for this turn. Activation markers bear the des- replaced by one belonging to the capturing faction. ignation AP, meaning Activation Points. Leader Activation Card (1C only): Activation Cards that bear the Activation Marker (2C/3C only): Markers drawn randomly dur- name of Leaders of the various factions. ing the Operations Phase to determine which leader or force goes Line of Communications (LOC): A line tracing back to a source next. of Resources. It can potentially include Points, Towns, Cities, and Activation Rating: The number on the left side of each Leader Sea Areas. There are two types of LOC: Limited and Unlimited. counter. NSP: Naval Strength Point; each Fleet counter begins with 2 NSP Adjacent Space: A space with a connecting line directly to the space and can be reduced to 1 NSP before being eliminated. in question. Path: See Space. Army: ASPs with a Leader. Point: See Space. Assault Points: Points inflicted by an army that Assaults a city; Resources: The ability each city has to ameliorate Attrition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Component 1A the Age of the Crusades, C1071-1204
    History Paper 1A (A-level) Specimen Question Paper Question 02 Student 1 Specimen Answer and Commentary V1.1 12/08/15 Strictly confidential Specimen Answer plus commentary The following student response is intended to illustrate approaches to assessment. This response has not been completed under timed examination conditions. It is not intended to be viewed as a ‘model’ answer and the marking has not been subject to the usual standardisation process. Paper 1A (A-level): Specimen question paper 02 To what extent was effective leadership responsible for the establishment of the crusader states in the years 1096 to 1154? (25 marks) Student Response There are a number of reasons why the crusader states were successfully established in the years 1097-1154, but by far the most important of these reasons was that they had effective leadership, for the most part. From the outset, the crusader states relied on effective leadership. For example, on the First Crusade, the leadership of Bohemond of Taranto was pivotal both at the Battle of Dorylaeum and the Siege of Antioch. Even after the First Crusade, when the crusader states were “little more than a loose network of dispersed outposts” (Asbridge), the leadership of Baldwin I of Jerusalem was important in establishing this nascent kingdom. Through a clever use of clemency mixed with ruthlessness, Baldwin was able to take Arsuf, Caesarea, and Acre in quick succession by 1104. As there was a real threat to Baldwin’s kingdom from Egypt, he had to not only pacify the region between Egypt and Syria, but also create a loyal and subservient aristocracy, which he did.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Turning Point in the History of the Crusades
    Jonathan Phillips. The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. xxix + 364 pp. $40.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-300-11274-0. Reviewed by Jonathan R. Lyon Published on H-German (March, 2008) As the author makes clear in the excellent in‐ cepts could be employed against a variety of Latin troduction to this work, the Second Crusade Christendom's enemies. (1145-49) has typically not attracted as much in‐ Phillips divides his work into fourteen terest from modern historians as the more fa‐ chronologically-arranged chapters, although sepa‐ mous First Crusade (1095-99) and Third Crusade rate chapters treat the Iberian and Baltic compo‐ (1188-92). A key explanation for this trend is the nents of the crusade. The frst two chapters dis‐ Second Crusade's failure to make any significant cuss the period between the First and the Second gains for the Christians of the Holy Land in the Crusade; chapter 1 focuses on the various pilgrim‐ wake of the Muslim conquest of Edessa in 1144. ages and crusading efforts of the early twelfth Nevertheless, as Phillips convincingly argues, this century, and chapter 2 provides a rich, fascinating crusade--despite its lack of success--demands discussion of the powerful legacy the First Cru‐ more attention than it has received for several sade left to Latin Christian culture in the decades reasons. It was the frst crusade to the Holy Land after 1099. Phillips persuasively argues that this to involve western European kings and thus legacy had a significant impact on recruiting for forced rulers to consider the consequences of the Second Crusade, because the generation of leaving their kingdoms for months (if not years) young nobles alive in the 1140s had grown up at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughout Anglo-Saxon and Norman Times, Many People – Not Just Rich Kings and Bishops
    THE CRUSADES: A FIGHT IN THE NAME OF GOD. Timeline: The First Crusade, 1095-1101; The Second Crusade, 1145-47; The Third Crusade, 1188-92; The Fourth Crusade, 1204; The Fifth Crusade, 1217; The Sixth Crusade, 1228-29, 1239; The Seventh Crusade, 1249-52; The Eighth Crusade, 1270. Throughout Anglo-Saxon and Norman times, many people – not just rich kings and bishops - went to the Holy Land on a Pilgrimage, despite the long and dangerous journey – which often took seven or eight years! When the Turks conquered the Middle East this was seen as a major threat to Christians. [a] Motives for the Crusades. 1095, Pope Urban II. An accursed race has violently invaded the lands of the Christians. They have destroyed the churches of God or taken them for their own religion. Jerusalem is now held captive by the enemies of Christ, subject to those who do not know God – the worship of the heathen….. He who makes this holy pilgrimage shall wear the sign of the cross of the Lord on his forehead or on his breast….. If you are killed your sins will be pardoned….let those who have been fighting against their own brothers now fight lawfully against the barbarians…. A French crusader writes to his wife, 1098. My dear wife, I now have twice as much silver, gold and other riches as I had when I set off on this crusade…….. A French crusader writes to his wife, 1190. Alas, my darling! It breaks my heart to leave you, but I must go to the Holy land.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CRUSADES Toward the End of the 11Th Century
    THE MIDDLE AGES: THE CRUSADES Toward the end of the 11th century (1000’s A.D), the Catholic Church began to authorize military expeditions, or Crusades, to expel Muslim “infidels” from the Holy Land!!! Crusaders, who wore red crosses on their coats to advertise their status, believed that their service would guarantee the remission of their sins and ensure that they could ​ ​ spend all eternity in Heaven. (They also received more worldly rewards, such as papal protection of their property and forgiveness of some kinds of loan payments.) ‘Papal’ = Relating to The Catholic Pope (Catholic Pope Pictured Left <<<) The Crusades began in 1095, when Pope Urban summoned a Christian army to fight its way to Jerusalem, and continued on and off until the end of the 15th century (1400’s A.D). No one “won” the Crusades; in fact, many thousands of people from both sides lost their lives. They did make ordinary Catholics across Christendom feel like they had a common purpose, and they inspired waves of religious enthusiasm among people who might otherwise have felt alienated from the official Church. They also exposed Crusaders to Islamic literature, science and technology–exposure that would have a lasting effect on European intellectual life. GET THE INFIDELS (Non-Muslims)!!!! >>>> <<<“GET THE MUSLIMS!!!!” Muslims From The Middle East VS, European Christians WHAT WERE THE CRUSADES? By the end of the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged as a significant power in its own right, though it still lagged behind other Mediterranean civilizations, such as that of the Byzantine Empire (formerly the eastern half of the Roman Empire) and the Islamic Empire of ​ ​ ​ the Middle East and North Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Orders (Helen Nicholson) Alan V. Murray, Ed. the Crusades
    Military Orders (Helen Nicholson) activities such as prayer and attending church services. Members were admitted in a formal religious ceremony. They wore a religious habit, but did not follow a fully enclosed lifestyle. Lay members Alan V. Murray, ed. The Crusades. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2006, pp. 825–829. predominated over priests in the early years, while the orders were still active in military affairs. The military order was a form of religious order first established in the first quarter of the twelfth The military orders were part of a religious trend of the late eleventh and early twelfth century toward century with the function of defending Christians, as well as observing the three monastic vows of wider participation in the religious life and more emphasis on action as against contemplation. The poverty, chastity, and obedience. The first military order was the Order of the Temple, formally Cistercian Order, founded at the end of the eleventh century, allowed laity from nonnoble families to established in the kingdom of Jerusalem in January 1120, while the Order of the Hospital (or Order of enter their order to perform manual tasks; orders of canons, founded in the late eleventh and early St. John of Jerusalem) began in the eleventh century as a hospice for pilgrims in Jerusalem and later twelfth centuries, could play an active role in society as priests working in the community, unlike on developed military responsibilities, perhaps as early as the mid-1120s. The Templars and traditional monks who lived enclosed lives in their monasteries. In the same way, the military orders Hospitallers became supranational religious orders, whose operations on the frontiers of Christendom did not follow a fully enclosed lifestyle, followed an active vocation, and were composed largely of laity: were supported by donations of land, money, and privileges from across Latin Christendom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson
    The Latin Principality of Antioch and Its Relationship with the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, 1188-1268 Samuel James Wilson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2016 1 Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed to the owner of the Intellectual Property Rights. 2 Abstract The Latin principality of Antioch was founded during the First Crusade (1095-1099), and survived for 170 years until its destruction by the Mamluks in 1268. This thesis offers the first full assessment of the thirteenth century principality of Antioch since the publication of Claude Cahen’s La Syrie du nord à l’époque des croisades et la principauté franque d’Antioche in 1940. It examines the Latin principality from its devastation by Saladin in 1188 until the fall of Antioch eighty years later, with a particular focus on its relationship with the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia. This thesis shows how the fate of the two states was closely intertwined for much of this period. The failure of the principality to recover from the major territorial losses it suffered in 1188 can be partly explained by the threat posed by the Cilician Armenians in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.Long.T65
    Cambridge University Press 0521017475 - The Leper King and his Heirs: Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem Bernard Hamilton Index More information Index Abbasid caliphs of Baghdad, 80 Alexius II Comnenus, Byzantine emperor, al-Muqta®, 68 138, 148, 160, 174 al-Mustadi, 159 Alexius the protosebastus, 160 al-Nazir,159,171,184 Alfonso II, king of Aragon, 118 Abul' Khair, Baldwin IV's riding master, 28 Alice, princess of Antioch, 24, 41 Abu Shamah, historian, 17±18, 136 Alix of Lorraine, 140 Abu Sulayman Dawud, Baldwin IV's doctor, Almoravids of Majorca, 170 28, 251 Alwa, Nubian Christian kingdom of, 69 Acre, 46 n. 14, 53, 60, 119, 122, 127±8, 147, Amalric,kingofJerusalem,1,6,9,23±40, 192, 197, 203±4, 217±18, 223, 227, 243 43,45n.4,60,63±4,84±7,89±92, leprosaria, 257 95, 97, 107, 110, 116, 119±20, 125, 129, siege of (1189±91), 137, 196 n. 40, 231±2 149, 162, 173, 220, 249±51 Adam of St George of Labaene, 35 relations with Byzantium, 64±7, 111±13, Adela, queen of France, 30, 140, 149±50 127 Aden, 80, 182 relations with the kingdom of Sicily, 75±6, al-Adil, Saladin's brother, 87, 98, 141, 181, 81±2 183±4, 195, 201 relations with the Order of Assassins, 70±5 giraffe of, 202 Amalric of Nesle, Latin patriarch of al-Afdal, Saladin's son, 227±8 Jerusalem, 23, 35±6, 42, 114, 122, 133, Agnes of ChaÃtillon, queen of Hungary, 105 138±9, 144, 162 AgnesofCourtenay,2,9,23±6,33±4,84,89, Ambroise, Estoire de la guerre sainte,12 95±8,103±6,152±3,158,160,163, Andronicus Angelus, Byzantine envoy, 127, 167±8, 188, 194, 214 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Montage Cover EN
    2000 REPORT DIPLOMATIC DIPLOMATIC THESOVEREIGN MILITARY HOSPITALLER ORDER OF ST. JOHN OF JERUSALEM, OF RHODES AND OF MALTA FOREWORD The Order of Malta has devoted itself over the HUMANITARIAN AND DIPLOMATIC ACTIVITIES centuries to developing its hospitaller, medical and 03 Medical and humanitarian activities humanitarian works, all of which it continues to 06 Diplomacy at the service of humanitarian aid carry out today. In this publication, the Order’s 09 Diplomatic relations throughout the world activities are presented in the chapters: 10 The Order’s diplomatic life Humanitarian and Diplomatic Activities; Spiritual 12 A retrospective of the 1999 Commitment; and History and Culture. and 2000 diplomatic calendars The Report provides a brief summary of the Order’s humanitarian works, published in detail in SPIRITUAL COMMITMENT the Activity Report, which covers its medical, 19 The Jubilee Year and the Church social, hospitaller and emergency humanitarian aid programmes. This publication is available from the HISTORY AND CULTURE Order’s Information Bureau in Rome or from the 23 Key dates Order of Malta in each country. 25 The artistic work of the Order of Malta 27 Exhibitions, conferences and museums 29 Numismatics and philately FOR MORE INFORMATION 34 Government of the Order 36 Recent bibliography 37 The Sovereign Order’s diplomatic missions At the dawn of the third millennium, the As well as good works, now more than ever, we need hope. Sovereign Order of Malta still actively For all those working with the Order of Malta in the serv- demonstrates the humanitarian and medical ice of their fellow man: religious, diplomats, volunteers, commitments that inspired its founding in doctors, professionals, artists, members of the Order, Jerusalem in the eleventh century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tribal Dimension in Mamluk-Jordanian Relations
    BETHANY J. WALKER MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY The Tribal Dimension in Mamluk-Jordanian Relations A growing interest in provincial history is producing alternative understandings of Mamluk political culture, ones that recognize the contributions and influence of local actors. 1 Given the uniquely local perspective of Syrian sources, the frequency with which one encounters references to local families and their larger tribal networks is not surprising. Jordanian nisbahs are a staple of Syrian biographical dictionaries, waqfīyāt, and chronicles of the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, indicating the degree to which the peoples of Transjordan participated in the cultural, intellectual, economic, and indeed political life of the time in southern Syria. Malkawis, Ḥisbānīs, and Ḥubrasis made academic careers in Damascus, Jerusalem, and Cairo and were active in Sufi organizations outside their home towns; Shobakis acquired land at an early stage in the development of private estates, endowing much of it as family and charitable awqāf at the turn of the ninth/fifteenth century; ʿAjlūnīs controlled markets and were successful in business; Kerakis were a constant challenge to the state in the fifteenth century, playing an active role in rebellions of myriad forms. 2 These teachers, businessmen, and rebels, regardless of where they were actually born and raised, traced their © The Middle East Documentation Center. The University of Chicago. 1 Yūsuf Ghawānimah, Al-Tārīkh al-Ḥaḍarī li-Sharq al-Urdunn fī al-ʿAṣr al-Mamlūkī (Amman, 1982); idem, Al-Tārīkh al-Siyāsī li-Sharq al-Urdunn fī ʿAṣr al-Mamlūkī al-Awwal (al-Mamālīk al-Baḥrīyah) (Amman, 1982); and idem, Dimashq fī ʿAṣr Dawlat al-Mamālīk al-Thānīyah (Amman, 2005); Taha Tarawneh [Tarāwinah], The Province of Damascus during the Second Mamluk Period (784/1382– 922/1516) (Irbid, 1987); Alexandrine Guérin, “Terroirs, Territoire et Peuplement en Syrie Méridionale à la Période Islamique (VIIe siècle–XVIe siècle): Étude de Cas: le Village de Msayké et la Région du Lağa” (Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbreviations
    ABBREVIATIONS Anonymous1 “De expugnatione civitatis Acconensis,” in Chronica magistri Rogeri de Houedene, ed. W. Stubbs, 3 vols, Rolls Series (London, 1868–71), 3.cvi–cxxxvi. Anonymous2 “Libellus de expugnatione terrae sanctae per Saladinum,” in Radulphi de Coggeshall Chronicon Anglicanum, ed. J. Stevenson, Rolls Series (London, 1875), 209–62. Anonymous3 “Ein zeitgenössisches Gedicht auf die Belagerung Accons,” in Forschungen zur deutschen Geschichte, ed. H. Prutz, vol. 21 (Göttingen, 1881), 449–94. Ansbert Quellen zur Geschichte des Kreuzzuges Kaiser Friedrichs I, ed. A. Chroust, Monumenta Germania Historica, Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum, New Series 5 (Berlin, 1928). Blasien Ottonis de Sancto Blasio chronica, ed. A. Hofmeister, Monumenta Germania Historica, Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum (Hanover, 1912). xii ABBREVIATIONS Coggeshall Radulphi de Coggeshall Chronicon Anglicanum, De expugnatione terrae sanctae libellus, Thomas Agnellus de morte et sepultura Henrici regis Angliae junioris; Gesta Fulconis filii Warini; Excerpta ex Otiis imperialibus Gervasii Tilebutiensis, ed. J. Stevenson, 3 vols, Rolls Series (London, 1875). Devizes “The chronicle of Richard of Devizes,” in Chronicles of the Reigns of Stephen, Henry II, and Richard I, ed. R. Howlett, 4 vols, Rolls Series (London, 1886). Eracles La Continuation de Guillaume de Tyr (1184–1197), ed. M.R. Morgan (Paris, 1982). Estoire The History of the Holy War: Ambroise’s Estoire de la Guerre Sainte, ed. and trans. M. Ailes and M. Barber, 2 vols (Woodbridge, 2003). Howden1 Gesta regis Henrici secundi Benedicti abbatis, ed. W. Stubbs, 2 vols, Rolls Series (London, 1867). Howden2 Chronica magistri Rogeri de Houedene, ed. W. Stubbs, 3 vols, Rolls Series (London, 1868–71). Ibn al- Athīr The Chronicle of Ibn al- Athīr for the Crusading Period from al- Mail fi’l- Ta’rikh, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Management in Syrian Villages (MSR XX, 2017)
    Did the Mamluks Have an Environmental Sense? Bethany Walker, Sofia Laparidou, Natural Resource Management in Syrian Villages Annette Hansen, and Chiara Cor- BBethan WBethaB SBeth LAethany B ABethan HBethaB Bet eBethA eBethan bino Did the Mamluks Have and Environmental Sense? Bethany Walker Sofia Laparidou University of Bonn University of Thessaloniki Annette Hansen Chiara Corbino University of Groningen University of Sheffield Did the Mamluks Have an Environmental Sense?: Natural Resource Management in Syrian Villages The economic changes of Sultan Barqūq’s reign and the post-Barqūqī era have increasingly come under scrutiny in recent years, changing the way we under- stand the transition to the Circassian Mamluk Sultanate. 1 The erosion of the iqṭāʿ 10.6082/M1H1304R system, through the transformation of state lands to private property, and the http://hdl.handle. “wave of waqf ” that emptied the Bayt al-Māl by Barqūq’s reign (and then again at net/11417/736 the end of the Mamluk Sultanate), necessitating a reorganization of the state fis- cal administration and the creation of new financial bureaus, are topics that have generated a respectable body of scholarship. 2 In the background of these trends is the ever-changing status of land tenure and land use. The co-authors of this article gratefully acknowledge the long-term support of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities and the American Center of Oriental Research in Amman during our many years of fieldwork in Jordan. Through a Harris Grant from the American Schools of Ori- ental Research we were able to conduct in 2014 the laser survey and 3-D documentation of sub- terranean water systems in support of our study of medieval-era irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Fragia.Indd
    JIA 6.2 (2019) 187–208 Journal of Islamic Archaeology ISSN (print) 2051-9710 https://doi.org/10.1558/jia.37337 Journal of Islamic Archaeology ISSN (print) 2051-9729 New Research Perspectives on the Mamluk Qāʾa at Kerak Castle: Building Archaeology and Historical Contextualization Lorenzo Fragai Ph D Candidate “La Sapienza” University of Rome University of Florence, “Medieval Petra” Archaeological Mission [email protected] The Mamluk dynasty (1250–1517) succeeded the Ayyubids in Egypt and Syria. From 1260, and for 260 years, construction projects and different types of buildings were sponsored by sultans, emirs, and members of the elite in Cairo, Damascus and Jerusa- lem as well as in smaller towns and regions on the outskirts of the Mamluk sultanate. Although the existing architecture from the Mamluk period is generally well known in Egypt and Syria, this is not always the case in other countries. In present-day Jordan, which was divided administratively into two large mamlakats, there are many sumptuous examples of mamluk buildings that still have yet to be investigated with the necessary attention. The case study ana- lysed here is the castrum/qalʿat Kerak in the late 13th and the first half of 14th century, where an exceptional example of Mamluk palatine architecture is partially preserved. According to written historical sources, this reception hall (or qāʾa) called Qā’at al-Naḥḥās can be attributed to al-Nāṣir Muḥammad ibn Qalāwūn (1310–1341), one of the most distinguished figure of the Mamluk sultanate. This paper will undertake to clarify the construction process of Mamluk royal spaces in Kerak as evidence of the Mamluk dynasty’s power and stability, using the methods of “Light Archaeology” (building stratigraphy, in particular) already used by the Italian archaeo- logical mission (University of Florence) at Petra and Shawbak (Medieval Petra project).
    [Show full text]