The Clovis Diet
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Volume 30, Number 1 Center for the Study of the First Americans Department of Anthropology January, 2015 Texas A&M University, 4352 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4352 ISSN 8755-6898 World Wide Web site http://centerfirstamericans.org and http://anthropology.tamu.edu 4 & 5 Kennewick Man! Side-by-side stories: what scientists have learned from his skeletal remains, and the legal battle they had to fight for the right to analyze them. 11 Another round in the Clovis Comet fracas Craters are an unresolved issue. Now the debate is whether Black Mats and European Usselo Horizons are the fingerprints of TheClovis Diet: an ET event. 15 The Central American Land Bridge (a.k.a. the Isthmus of Mostly Mammoths? Panama): the gateway to South American colonization? HE DEBATE HAS RAGED in the which they presented at the 2013 Paleo- Clovis-age and pre-Clovis sites literature since the late 1960s: Did american Odyssey conference (MT 29-1, may be long-term occupations, or Clovis people specialize in hunt- “The Conference That Was!”) and which the temporary camps of migrants, ing big game? Were they responsible for appears in the companion book, Paleo- perhaps boat people, passing through. The answer, however, wipingTT out the Pleistocene megafauna? Or american Odyssey, published by the Center may lie fathoms deep offshore is our understanding of the Clovis way of for the Study of the First Americans. They in the Pacific Ocean. life clouded by too much attention to the concluded that the Clovis diet varied from archaeological record of the Southwest, region to region, but overlying this vari- where Clovis points have been found with ability was a focus on big game, indeed the Colorado, Blackwater Draw in New several mammoth skeletons? And is even biggest game, whenever and wherever it Mexico, Miami in Texas, and Lehner that record biased by the higher archaeo- was available. in Arizona. These discoveries sug- logical visibility of mammoth versus deer gested the possibility that Clovis or rabbit kills? The debate hunters were specifically targeting Gary Haynes and his graduate student Clovis was first recognized as a late-Pleis- mammoths, though until the late Jarod Hutson reviewed the evidence in tocene archaeological culture when Clovis 1960s most archaeologists appear to their paper “Clovis-era subsistence: Re- spear points were found in association have assumed that big game consti- gional variability, continental patterning,” with mammoths at sites such as Dent in tuted only a portion of the Clovis diet. 2 Volume 30 n Number 1 In 1967, the late Paul Martin began erally non-extinct species, so the sample indian people chose small game more to make his famous “blitzkrieg” argu- of Clovis kill sites must be biased in favor often that we see in the archaeologi- ment that the Clovis culture was directly of big game. In addition, the chronology cal record.” Indeed, citing the work of responsible for the extinction of mam- of big-game extinctions isn’t well estab- Todd Surovell and Nicole Waguespack, moths and other Pleistocene megafauna lished, so some of the Pleistocene big- Haynes and Hutson argue that “Clovis- in North America. Certainly, the appear- game species may have become extinct era people clearly decided to hunt big ance of Clovis appeared to coincide with centuries before the appearance of Clovis. game even when smaller animals must Haynes and Hutson agree that large have been more abundant.” They submit mammal bones likely are better pre- that while some might call this “spe- served and easier to find, but they note cialization,” it is instead “a strong and that this “does not prove that Paleo- rational preference.” riston W The Mammoth Trumpet (ISSN 8755-6898) is published quarterly by the Center for eresa T the Study of the First Americans, Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, Haynes in Zimbabwe sorting through dry- College Station, TX 77843-4352. Phone (979) 845-4046; fax (979) 845-4070; e-mail screened sediments at an NSF-funded [email protected]. Periodical postage paid at College Station, TX 77843-4352 and at ad- rockshelter excavation. ditional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: the disappearance of many species of Mammoth Trumpet Pleistocene large mammals in the Ameri- Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University cas as well as in other parts of the world. 4352 TAMU Several archaeologists have criticized College Station, TX 77843-4352 Martin’s arguments and conclusions. Copyright © 2015 Center for the Study of the First Americans. Permission is hereby Donald Grayson and David Meltzer are given to any non-profit or educational organization or institution toreproduce without cost any materials from the Mammoth Trumpet so long as they are then distributed at no more than actual cost. The Center further requests that notification of reproduction of materials under these conditions be sent to the Center. Address correspondence to the editor of Mammoth Trumpet, 2122 Scout Road, Lenoir, NC 28645. Michael R. Waters Director and General Editor e-mail: [email protected] Ted Goebel Associate Director and Editor, PaleoAmerica e-mail: [email protected] James M. Chandler Editor, Mammoth Trumpet e-mail: [email protected] Christel Cooper Office Manager e-mail: [email protected] & C C Wordsmiths Layout and Design AlphaGraphics Printing and mailing Web site: www.alphagraphics.com utson World Wide Web site http://centerfirstamericans.com H The Center for the Study of the First Americans is a non-profit organization. Subscrip- arod J tion to the Mammoth Trumpet is by membership in the Center. Hutson at the entrance of a hyena den near Ngamo Pan in Hwange National Park, Mammoth Trumpet, Statement of Our Policy Zimbabwe, August 2011. Many years may pass between the time an important discovery is made and the acceptance of research results by the scientific community. To facilitate communication among all parties interested in staying abreast of breaking news in First Americans studies, the Mammoth Trumpet, a science news magazine, among the principal critics of what has provides a forum for reporting and discussing new and potentially controversial information important to been called the Overkill hypothesis. They understanding the peopling of the Americas. We encourage submission of articles to the Managing Editor observed that the bones of large animals and letters to the Editor. Views published in the Mammoth Trumpet are the views of contributors, and do not reflect the views of the editor or Center personnel. are preferentially preserved and discov- –Michael R. Waters, Director ered relative to bones of smaller and gen- January n 2015 3 As for the timing of megafaunal extinctions, Haynes and mals, Clovis sites also very rarely yield evidence of plant foods, Hutson agreed that some data now suggest that a decline in the such as hawthorn nuts, goosefoot seeds, and black berries. abundance of big game did precede the appearance of Clovis. Given the generally poor preservation of plant remains at They attribute this decline to hunting by proto-Clovis foragers most archaeological sites, Haynes and Hutson acknowledge who shared the “strong and rational preference” for the meat that “the proportion of plant foods in the Clovis-era diet is very of the largest game available. difficult to know.” Nevertheless, they conclude that “plant Haynes and Hutson draw upon several lines of evidence to foods must have featured regularly in Late Glacial diets” (MT build their case for a Clovis diet that, although variable, focused 29-3, “Clovis spear points used to process plants”). How- on big-game. First and foremost is the direct empirical evi- ever, the absence of much evidence for specialized grinding dence of food remains at technology at Clovis-era sites at least Clovis and proto-Clovis means that they weren’t eating a lot of sites. This could include acorns or grass seeds, which would “bones with cutmarks become “the staples of many later or burned seeds in fire (post-Clovis, Archaic) groups.” features” as well as pro- tein residues preserved Beyond the physical evidence on the working edges of There are avenues to understanding stone tools. the lives and diets of early Paleoin- Ethnographic analo- dians that go beyond the empirical gies provide a second evidence. One of these avenues is eth- line of evidence, and a nographic analogy, which involves third consists of applica- using recent hunting and gathering waters . R tions of various relevant cultures as potential models for the social theories, such as behavior of ancient hunters and gath- optimal foraging theory, michael to gain insight into what sorts of foods a Where mammoth once roamed: Blackwater Draw, hypothetical “optimal forager” would tend New Mexico (above), and Duewall-Newberry, Texas. to eat considering the resources available Clovis artifacts were found in association with in a given environment. mammoth remains at the Blackwater Draw site. Although no artifacts were found at the Duewall- Clovis-era diets: The evidence Newberry site, it appears to be of Clovis age. The direct evidence for the diets of Clovis age people includes 19 sites at which mam- erers. Haynes and Hutson acknowledge that mal bones and Clovis artifacts have been there are “possibly unknowable differences found in relatively clear association. These between modern peoples and late Pleisto- include the classic Clovis sites of Dent cene human populations.” Nevertheless, they and Blackwater Draw as well as Eastern observe that some ethnographically studied sites that may be the same age or slightly groups actively pursued large mammals “in younger. Eleven sites include the remains spite of high risks and costs.” Such activity, of at least 56 mammoths. There are also 33 however, may be more about males showing bison from 6 sites, 14 hare or cottontail rab- off than simply meeting dietary require- bits from 2 sites, and 11 deer from 3 sites.