The Premier for Cabinet Sub-Committee Re: Boundary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Premier for Cabinet Sub-Committee Re: Boundary MINUTES forming ENCLOSURE to COLG 2004/0014 guy TO: THE PREMIER FOR CABINET SUB-COMMITTEE RE: BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PROSPECT AND THE CITY OF CHARLES STURT 1. PROPOSAL That Her Excellency the Governor in Executive Council proclaims a boundary adjustment between The City of Prospect and the City of Charles Sturt at Torrens Road, Ovingham. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 The Boundary Adjustment Facilitation Panel (the Panel) is an independent representative body established under the Local Government Act 1999 (the Act) to investigate and make recommendations to the Minister for State/Local Government Relations on proposals for council boundary changes. 2.2 The Panel has considered a joint structural reform proposal under section 27 of the Act by The City of Prospect and the City of Charles Sturt to realign the boundary between the two Councils at Torrens Road, Ovingham. 2.3 With the completion of the upgrade of Torrens Road between Park Terrace/ Fitzroy Terrace and the railway line on Torrens Road, the two Councils wish to relocate the common boundary to align it with the central median on Torrens Road (as shown on the attached plan - Attachment A). 3. DISCUSSION 3.1 The position of the realigned boundary will be consistent with the location of Council boundaries on other arterial roads. 3.2 The alteration will ensure that the Councils can facilitate effective planning and development within their areas without having any detrimental impact on their resource base in order to fulfil their functions fairly, effectively and efficiently. 3.3 The Panel supports the joint Council proposal and has recommended to me. that a proclamation be made pursuant to sections 9 and 11 of the Act to-alter and adjust the common boundary. 3.4 The Definitions Unit, Department of Administrative and Information Services, prepared the necessary technical description of the area (Attachment B). 3.5 Impacts and Consultation 3.5.1 Economic, financial and budget implications The proposal has no economic, financial or budget implications. 3.5.2 Impact on the community and the environment The proposal will have no significant impact on environment, regional, small business, family or regulatory matters. s 3.5.3 Risk Management Strategy There are no risks evident in implementing the proposal. 3.5.4 Implementation Plan The proposal does not require an implementation plan. 3.5.5 Consultation The Panel placed a notice calling for written submissions on the proposal in The Advertiser, the Government Gazette, and local newspapers circulating in the relevant Council areas. A written representation was received from a residents' group from the Broadview Sefton Park area of the City of Port Adelaide Enfield, which is not directly affected by the proposed boundary alteration. For some time this group has been endeavouring to prepare public initiated submissions to relocate to The City of Prospect. Under the Act a public initiated submission cannot be made to a Council where there has been a structural alteration within the previous two years. Following the receipt of legal advice, the Panel considered the representation and proceeded to support the Council initiated submission. The Panel is satisfied that adequate community consultation on the proposal has been carried out. Relevant agencies (Transport SA, Planning SA, DEH, DWLBC, Office of Regional Affairs, DTED, DFC, DPC) have been consulted to determine any impacts, with no objections being raised. 3.5.6 Executive Council A proclamation will be required for presentation to the Governor for authorisation once drafted by Parliamentary Counsel. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that Cabinet Sub-Committee: 4.1 Recommend that Her Excellency the Governor in Executive Council issue a proclamation under sections 9 and 11 of the Local Government Act 1999 to give effect to a boundary adjustment between The City of Prospect and the City of Charles Sturt at Torrens Road, Ovingham as defined in the plan attached. Cabinet In Sub Committ - 8 NOV 2004 Hon Rory McEwenMP APPROVEDOVED^; y MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND FISHERIES MINISTER FOR STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS yFooorrr PREM»; Date: 0 2 NOV 2004 2 N m m rri HUNDRED OF YATALA m SUBURB OF OVINGHAM m 3] OVINGHAM RAILWAY STATION m MUNICIPALITY OF 4r>3» PROSPECT FITZROY WARD m m <3 m m MUNICIPALITY r OF 4i CHARLES STURT cE FITZROY TERRA HINDMARSH WARD 57 fi) o EXISTING COMMON BOUNDARY SHOWN THUS <D NEW COMMON BOUNDARY SHOWN THUS Attachment B Alter and adjust portion of the common boundary between the municipality of Charles Sturt and the municipality of Prospect, more particularly delineated on the plan published herewith. DAIS 04/0011 Certified Correct U/S 72004 Supervisor, Roads & Crown Support for SURVEYOR-GENERAL .
Recommended publications
  • Annual-Report-2019-20.Pdf
    fs Page 1 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ________________________________________________________________3 Snapshot of our City _______________________________________________________________5 Fast Facts about Charles Sturt in 2019/20 ______________________________________________6 Key Financials – Overview ___________________________________________________________7 About Council – Council Members ___________________________________________________9 Council and Committee Structure from July 2019 to June 2020 ____________________________13 Committees from July 2019 to June 2020 _____________________________________________15 Working Groups from July 2019 to 30 June 2020 ________________________________________21 Council Member Allowances _______________________________________________________25 Representation & Elections ________________________________________________________ 27 Our Workplace __________________________________________________________________29 Management & Staffing ___________________________________________________________30 Our Leadership Team _____________________________________________________________31 Our Employees __________________________________________________________________ 32 Our Workplaces _________________________________________________________________ 33 Corporate Indicators 2019/20 ______________________________________________________ 34 Finances & Accountability __________________________________________________________ 69 Page 2 OVERVIEW Executive Summary 2020 has been a year of rapid
    [Show full text]
  • Publication2
    Way2Go e-newsletter issue 1 : term 1 : 2012 Welcome to Way2Go 2012 Date to remember Our School and Education Programs Team is looking forward to working with current and Ride2School Day will be held on new Way2Go schools in 2012 and beyond. Our Way2Go partnership is with local govern- 23 March 2012. To find out more ments and schools. Below are the names and contact details of our Education Consultants and/or register your school for this event go to and the local government areas each will be working with in 2012. These include councils www.bikesa.asn.au/ and schools new to the program, as well as schools that are already actioning their School RiderInfo_Programs_ Travel Plans. Please feel welcome to contact us for advice, support or to share a good news NatRideSchoolDay story. Sue McMillan Dan Crane Krystil Ellis Coordinator School and Education Education Consultant Education Consultant Programs [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] phone: 84021917 phone: 8343 2088 phone: 8343 2459 mobile: 0400661119 mobile: 0401 120 864 mobile: 0421 832 818 Adelaide Hills Council City of Charles Sturt Alexandrina Council Berri Barmera Council City of Holdfast Bay City of Port Adelaide Enfield City of Burnside City of Marion City of Whyalla City of Campbelltown City of Onkaparinga DC Victor Harbor City of Mount Gambier City of Playford DC Yankalilla City of Mitcham City of Port Lincoln Iwantja (Indulkana) City of Payneham Norwood St Peters City of West Torrens Port Augusta City Council City of Prospect DC Streaky Bay Port Pirie DC City of Salisbury MC Roxby Downs City of Tea Tree Gully RC Murray Bridge City of Unley The Barossa Council DC Grant Town of Gawler DC Loxton Waikerie DC Mount Barker Way2Go Bike Ed DC Robe Town of Walkerville 2 Way2Go e-newsletter issue 1 : term 1 : 2012 Annual Review two we will invite several new Way2Go schools and button) crossings; school An important part of having groups of teachers, country those schools that zones and crossing monitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives to Amalgamation in Australian Local Government: the Case of Walkerville by Brian Dollery and Joel Byrnes No. 2005-4
    University of New England School of Economics Alternatives to Amalgamation in Australian Local Government: The Case of Walkerville by Brian Dollery and Joel Byrnes No. 2005-4 Working Paper Series in Economics ISSN 1442 2980 http://www.une.edu.au/febl/EconStud/wps.htm Copyright © 2005 by UNE. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided this copyright notice appears on all such copies. ISBN 1 86389 9502 Alternatives to Amalgamation in Australian Local Government: The Case of Walkerville∗ Brian Dollery and Joel Byrnes∗∗ Abstract Structural reform chiefly through of council amalgamation has long been the most favoured means of enhancing municipal efficiency by Australian state government policy makers. However, the disappointing results of most amalgamation programs have led to a growing scepticism in the local government community and a search for alternative methods of improving council efficiency. Not only have scholars designed generic models suitable for Australian conditions, but individual councils and groups of councils around the country have also developed several de facto alternatives to amalgamation. An embryonic body of research has now begun to examine the efficacy of these alternative organizational arrangements. The present paper seeks to augment this nascent literature evaluating the outcomes achieved by Walkerville; an Adelaide suburban council that escaped the South Australian merger program completed in 1998. Key Words: Amalgamation; Regional Co-operative Agreement (RCA); Walkerville ∗ The authors would like to thank the Town of Walkerville Mayor John Rich and senior management for their kind assistance and co-operation in bringing this paper to fruition.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Partnerships and Collaboration - Finalists
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION - FINALISTS Award Finalists COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION THANKS TO City of Charles Sturt - Open Space, Recreation & Property Team - St Clair Recreation Centre The three year, $28 million jointly funded infrastructure project to rebuild the St Clair Recreation Centre was a collaboration between the Minister for Education, the Department for Planning Transport and Infrastructure and the City of Charles Sturt. The result is a facility for tomorrow - catering for the indoor sporting needs of the western suburbs communities. The involvement of stakeholders and community clubs in the project was significant and the development of relationships fundamental to its success. Strengthening the long term sustainability of recreational facilities in the western region, St Clair Recreation Centre is accessible to the Woodville High School and enabled the amalgamation and relocation of three sporting groups. The project was supported by the State’s 30 Year Plan, the Western Region’s Western Adelaide Sporting Facilities Supply and Demand Study and the City of Charles Sturt Community and Corporate Plan. Collaboration with Government and alignment to key strategic directions enabled the development of significant infrastructure associated with the Centre, which services the western region and some 200,000 residents, through the provision of a six court stadium including roller skating, gymnasium, regional immunisation clinic and sustainable building design. Contact: Sam Higgins Manager Open Space Recreation and Property, City of Charles Sturt 8408 1157 [email protected] Award Finalists COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATION THANKS TO City of Holdfast Bay - The Kaurna Nation Partnership Team Throughout 2019, the City of Holdfast Bay was both humbled and honoured to work with the Kaurna community to complete two significant initiatives that demonstrate the role that local government can play in indigenous affairs and reconciliation.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of PLAYFORD Cycling and Walking STRATEGY FINAL | FEBRUARY 2014
    CITY OF PLAYFORD CYCLING AND WALKING STRATEGY FINAL | FEBRUARY 2014 1 CITY OF PLAYFORD CYCLING AND WALKING STRATEGY urban design landscape architecture urban planning ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Cycling and Walking Strategy was commissioned by the City of Playford (CoP) under the direction of the Project Steering Group: – Richard Tang, Traffic Engineer (CoP) – Lisa Atwell, OPAL Manager (CoP) – Ken Potter, Transport Planner (CoP) – R ob Veitch, Manager Growth and Regeneration (CoP) – Greg Salmon, Urban Planner (CoP) – Edith Mayer, Manager Community Development and Stakeholder Engagement (Renewal SA) – Tim McEvoy, Senior Planner (DPTI) The Oxigen team preparing the report was Luke Stein, James Hayter and Christina Fusco. ISSUE: FINAL _ 21.02.14 cover IMAGE: CourtesY OF OPAL, SA HEALTH 2 CONTENTS CITY OF PLAYFORD CONTENTS I 4 ntroduction 8 Part 1: Benefits 14 Part 2: Vision 18 Part 3: Existing Conditions 48 Part 4: Consultation 54 Part 5: Best Practice 68 Part 6: Recommendations 106 Part 7: Implementation 3 CITY OF PLAYFORD CYCLING AND WALKING STRATEGY OVERVIEW Cycling and walking are fundamental everyday modes of transport and central to active living and supporting healthy lifestyles. Despite this, many of our urban environments are not conducive to walking or cycling. Getting around the City of Playford on foot or bike can be a challenge. Like many parts of Australia, the City of Playford has been planned and designed predominantly for motor vehicle transport. The car-dominant environment and focus on infrastructure and budgets supporting this mode of transport makes the simple task of getting from place to place difficult for those who do not have a car, or who wish to travel by other modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Business and Community Profile
    South Road Superway Project Impact Report 8. Business and community profile 8.1 Overview The business and community profile of the South Road Superway study area in this section also considers potential effects on existing communities working and living in the area. A business and community profile offers a better understanding of the character and functionality of the study area. The study area, bordered by the Port River Expressway to the north, Hanson Road to the west, Regency Road to the south and Churchill Road to the east, lies mostly in the City of Port Adelaide Enfield; the southwestern and southeastern corners of the study area fall within the City of Charles Sturt and City of Prospect respectively. It includes the suburbs: Angle Park Dry Creek (part of) Westwood (formerly Ferryden Park) Kilburn Kilkenny (part of) Mansfield Park Prospect (part of) Regency Park Wingfield Woodville Gardens. 8.2 Communities of interest For analysis, the study area has been divided into six precincts with similar attributes ( Figure 8.1 ). The precincts include industrial clusters, educational and recreational facilities, and redeveloped and existing residential areas. Precinct 1 – Wingfield northwest This precinct is located north of the Wingfield Rail Line and west of South Road, and includes small- scale industry as well as a refuse depot in the northwest. Precinct 2 – Wingfield northeast This precinct is located north of the Wingfield Rail Line and east of South Road. A part of the Barker Inlet Wetlands is located in its eastern part of the precinct and a cluster of small scale industry forms its western half.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Papers Light Regional Council Tuesday, 28 July
    VISION Respecting the Past, Creating our Future. CORE PRINCIPLES Light Regional Council is guided by a focus on ‘Core Principles’ of Growth; Reform; Innovation and Discipline. AGENDA PAPERS for the meeting of LIGHT REGIONAL COUNCIL in the COUNCIL CHAMBER 93 Main Street, Kapunda TUESDAY, 28 JULY 2020 at 5:00pm Principal Office: 93 Main Street Branch Office: 12 Hanson Street Kapunda 5373 Freeling 5372 Telephone: 8525 3200 Facsimile: 8566 3262 o NOTICE OF MEETING ^ A Lic HT REGIONAL COUNCIL Mayor and Councillors, Notice is herebygiven pursuant to the provisions of Section 83 (3) of the Local Government Act, 1999, that the next Ordinary Meeting of Council will be held in the Council Chamber, 93 Main Street, Kapunda on Tuesdav, 28 July 2020 at 5:000m A copy of the Agenda for the above meeting is supplied as prescribed by Section 83 (3) of the said Act. , , 7/7 , . ^I^ , . TABLE OF CONTENTS for the meeting of LIGHT REGIONAL COUNCIL TUESDAY, 28 JULY 2020 Petitions, Deputations, Presentations: 7.2.1 Presentation by Chief Executive Officer – ‘July 2020 – Pre-COVID-19’ ..... 3 Reports for Information: 11.1 Roseworthy Township Expansion - Progress Update ................................. 6 11.2 Council ‘In-kind’ Support of Community-Managed Events ........................ 17 11.3 Community Grants Program – Delay in Opening of Round One 2020/2021 ................................................................................................................. 18 11.4 University of Adelaide Student Project ...................................................... 20 11.5 Story Trail at “The Pines” Conservation Reserve ..................................... 20 11.6 Legatus Board, Special Meeting Minutes July 2020. ................................ 22 11.7 Monthly Financial Report – June 2020 ..................................................... 22 Reports for Decision and Procedural Matters: 12.2.1 Loan Borrowings as at 30 June 2020 ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project/Work Groups 2018-19 As at 31/12/2018
    Project/Work Groups 2018-19 as at 31/12/2018 Asset Management Alex Brown, Adelaide City Council [email protected] Asset Management Alex Oulianoff, Mount Barker District [email protected] Council Asset Management Annette Martin (Deputy Chairperson), [email protected] City of Charles Sturt Asset Management Anthony Amato, Town of Gawler [email protected] Asset Management Cadel Blunt, City of Holdfast Bay [email protected] Asset Management Chris Birch, City of Prospect [email protected] Asset Management David Edgerton, APV Valuers & Asset [email protected] Management Asset Management Donna Stubbs, City of Charles Sturt [email protected] Asset Management Elizabeth Waters, The Barossa Council [email protected] Asset Management Emil Bogatec, City of Onkaparinga [email protected] Asset Management Gary Lewis, District Council of Yankalilla [email protected] Asset Management Gary Long, City of Prospect [email protected] Asset Management Gideon Joubert, Alexandrina Council [email protected] u Asset Management Grace Pelle, City of Playford [email protected] Asset Management Joe Scordo, Light Regional Council [email protected] Asset Management Jonathan Crook, City of Tea Tree Gully [email protected] Asset Management Kate George, City of Salisbury [email protected] Asset Management Katy Bone (Chairperson), Town of [email protected] Walkerville Asset Management Leta
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Meeting
    NOTICE OF MEETING To All Members of Council I wish to advise that an ordinary meeting of Council will be held in the: Council Chambers 72 Woodville Road, Woodville commencing at 7.00 pm on Monday, 9 April 2018. PAUL SUTTON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Dated 5 April 2018 Please advise Adam Filipi if you are unable to attend this meeting or will be late. Telephone 8408 1115. We acknowledge that the land we meet on today is the traditional land of the Kaurna people. We respect their spiritual relationship with this land. We also acknowledge the Kaurna people as traditional custodians of the Kaurna land. We will endeavour, as Council, to act in a way that respects Kaurna heritage and the cultural beliefs of the Kaurna people. City of Charles Sturt 1. CL Agenda 9/04/18 A G E N D A 1. COUNCIL OPENING 1.1 Prayer 1.2 Apologies for absence 2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 2.1 COUNCIL Confirmation of the minutes of the previous meeting held on Monday, 26 March 2018. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES – Part I 2.2 Corporate Services Committee, which met on Tuesday, 3 April 2018. That having considered the recommendation of the Committee which has read and considered the reports in the agenda related to items: 3.14 DRAFT ANNUAL BUSINESS PLAN 2018/19 FOR CONSULTATION 3.15 POLICIES FOR REVIEW ‐ MINOR CHANGES ONLY Council adopts the recommendations of the Committee as printed in the Minutes of this Committee. Page No. 3. REPORTS Nil 4. DEPUTATIONS 4.05 DEPUTATION – DRAFT PUBLIC CONSULTATION POLICY – MR TOM CROMPTON – COASTAL ECOLOGY PROTECTION GROUP INCORPORATED (B106) 1 Brief A deputation request was received from Mr Tom Crompton on behalf of the Coastal Ecology Protection Group Incorporated in relation to the Draft Public Consultation Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • State Urban Forest Leaderboard
    WHERE WILL ALL THE TREES BE? URBAN FORESTS IN SA 10.5% 5.3% Suburban, spacious Urban, spacious Urban, compact 36.8% 1 3 5 Place type and low rainfall and low rainfall and low rainfall 11-50% Biggest gain*: 3.6% 19 47.4% urban forest cover SA by % 2 Suburban, spacious 4 Urban, spacious and 6 Urban, compact and Biggest loss*: 3.6% and avg-high rainfall avg-high rainfall avg-high rainfall PLACES DIFFERENCE IN URBAN FOREST COVER (2013-2020) DIFFERENCE IN URBAN FOREST COVER (2016-2020) URBAN FOREST COVER 2020 1 City of Adelaide 5.70% 1 City of Adelaide 3.60% 1 City of Mitcham 50.30% 2 City of Burnside 4.70% 2 City of Unley 3.00% 2 Adelaide Hills Council 50.10% 3 City of Tea Tree Gully Council 1.00% 3 City of Tea Tree Gully Council 2.80% 3 City of Burnside 42.20% 4 City of Mitcham 0.79% 4 City of Onkaparinga 2.20% 4 City of Onkaparinga 31.20% 4 City of Holdfast Bay -1.30% 5 City of Salisbury 1.40% 5 City of Tea Tree Gully Council 31.00% 6 City of Norwood Payneham and St Peters -1.50% 5 City of Playford 1.40% 6 City of Unley 29.80% 7 City of Unley -2.10% 7 City of Marion 0.80% 7 City of Adelaide 27.30% 8 City of Prospect -2.20% 8 Town of Gawler Council 0.70% 8 Cambelltown City Council 24.60% 8 City of Salisbury -2.20% 9 City of Holdfast Bay 0.60% 9 City of Norwood Payneham and St Peters 23.70% 10 Cambelltown City Council -2.90% 10 City of Charles Sturt 0.50% 10 Town of Walkerville 22.60% 11 City of Onkaparinga -2.90% 11 Adelaide Hills Council 0.50% 11 City of Salisbury 22.10% 12 City of Port Adelaide Enfield -3.30% 12 City of Norwood Payneham
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Awards Program
    2019 Awards Program Recognising and rewarding excellence in Information Technology and Information Management across Local Government. FINALISTS 2019 LGITSA Awards Finalists 1 2019 Awards Finalists Contents Excellence in Information Management ........................................................................................ 4 City of Marion - Metrics that Matter Delivery Group ......................................................................... 4 City of Victor Harbor - ICT Team ......................................................................................................... 5 City of Tea Tree Gully - IT Solutions Team .......................................................................................... 6 Excellence in Community Experience ............................................................................................ 7 City of Salisbury - Arrangements to Pay Systemisation Team ............................................................ 7 City of Prospect, City of Burnside, Campbelltown City Council, City of Playford, City of Port Adelaide Enfield - Connected Cities Champions ................................................................................. 8 City of Tea Tree Gully - Customer First Solution Project Team ........................................................... 9 City of West Torrens - Web Administrators ...................................................................................... 10 Excellence in IT Service Delivery ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-21 Infrastructure Projects - Successful Applicants (In Alphabetical Order)
    2020-21 Infrastructure Projects - Successful Applicants (in alphabetical order) AMOUNT APPLICANT PROJECT RECOMMENDED (GST EXCLUSIVE) REGIONAL AND DISTRICTS FACILITIES PROGRAM City of Playford To enhance a regional sports hub by installing 17 lighting towers with 250 lux LED sports floodlighting at Playford $400,000 Sports Precinct, Ridley Reserve West, Elizabeth. City of Playford To enhance a regional sports hub by constructing three new unisex change rooms at Elizabeth Oval, Playford Sports $894,436 Precinct, Elizabeth and install lighting towers at Playford International College, Elizabeth. City of Prospect To enhance a regional sports hub with new clubrooms, change rooms, and viewing areas at the Yarnta Tutu Yarta $1,035,564 Community and Sports Hub, Broadview. Kensington District Cricket To enhance a regional sports hub by constructing a new facility including six unisex change rooms, four umpire $2,670,000 Club Incorporated rooms, storage, gym, office, meeting room, clubrooms with bar and kitchen, spectator viewing areas, disability access including lift, at Kensington District Cricket Club, Kensington Gardens. TOTAL $5,000,000 GRASSROOTS FACILITIES PROGRAM Angaston Bowling Club To construct a new clubroom facility with two synthetic greens, lighting towers, shelter and seating, at Angaston $600,000 Incorporated Bowling Club, Angaston. Birchmore Bowling Club To upgrade sports floodlighting at Birchmore Bowling Club, Birchmore. $6,400 Incorporated Booleroo Centre Bowling Club To install a synthetic bowling green at the Booleroo Centre Bowling Club, Booleroo Centre. $60,950 Incorporated City of Charles Sturt To construct a new unisex change room facility including amenities, an umpire's room and a first aid room and to $295,650 upgrade existing changeroom to create two unisex facilities with amenities at Fawk Reserve Clubroom, Woodville North Sports Club, Woodville North.
    [Show full text]