2013 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist | Architectureau 2013 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne – Aikenhead Wing Proposed demolition Referral report and Heritage Impact Statement 27 & 31 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy July 2021 Prepared by Prepared for St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Quality Assurance Register The following quality assurance register documents the development and issue of this report prepared by Lovell Chen Pty Ltd in accordance with our quality management system. Project no. Issue no. Description Issue date Approval 8256.03 1 Draft for review 24 June 2021 PL/MK 8256.03 2 Final Referral Report and HIS 1 July 2021 PL Referencing Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced as endnotes or footnotes and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify and acknowledge material from the relevant copyright owners. Moral Rights Lovell Chen Pty Ltd asserts its Moral right in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Lovell Chen’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Limitation Lovell Chen grants the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty- free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral rights of Lovell Chen or third parties. This report is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Lovell Chen Pty Ltd and its Client. Lovell Chen Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. -
PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Expert Heritage Evidence
PLANNING PANELS VICTORIA Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365 Heritage Overlay HO1205 Subject Site: “Chart House”, No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street Melbourne Expert Heritage Evidence Prepared for Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd By Robyn Riddett Director Anthemion Consultancies POB18183 Collins Street East Melbourne 8003 Tel. +61 3 9495 6389 Email: [email protected] December 2019 “Chart House” No. 372 - 378 Little Bourke Street, Melbourne 1.0 Introduction 1. I have been instructed by Best Hooper, on behalf of Berjaya Developments Pty Ltd, to prepare expert heritage evidence which addresses the heritage aspects of the proposal to grade the site as “Contibutory”, as a consequence of the Guildford and Hardware Laneways Heritage Study prepared by Lovell Chen in May 2017, as a consequence of Melbourne Planning Scheme Amendment C365. 2. The previous Property Schedule included in the Guildford & Hardware Laneways Precinct Citation graded the building as Contributory. In effect it graded the east wall abutting Niagara Lane but not the façade addressing Little Bourke Street which Lovell Chen had indicated was not of any significance. Subsequently the Amendment C271 Panel recommended that “Chart House” be included within HO1205 with a Non-contributory grading. When HO1205 came into effect on 12 August 2019, No. 372 – 378 Little Bourke Street was included within HO1205 but with a Contributory, rather than with a Non- contributory grading and on an interim basis as a consequence of Amendment C355melb. This change in grading appears to have been influenced by correspondence from Melbourne Heritage Action which put forward new information about “Chart House”. It is now proposed, as a consequence of Amendment C365melb, to include No. -
Architecture Creating Connections Recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards Shortlist
Architecture creating connections recognised in 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist The best of Victoria’s architecture, showcasing the immense value architects add when embedded end to end in a project, has been revealed with the release today of the 2020 Victorian Architecture Awards shortlist. The awards program, run by the Victorian Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects, features a shortlist recognising architecture in the public realm, residential sector, regional areas, embedded sustainability and much more. Spread across 14 categories, 108 entries have made the shortlist which encompasses 76 individual projects. Victorian Chapter President Amy Muir says the shortlisted projects define the significant role that quality built outcomes have in creating sustainable, resilient buildings that can endure for generations. The selected projects go beyond the parameters of the brief to deliver compelling results. ‘This year’s shortlisted projects are exemplars of the outcomes that can be achieved when architects are engaged in the entire process, resulting in a strong collaboration between client, consultants and contracted builders,’ said Ms Muir. ‘These projects are leading examples of how architects elevate quality through carefully considered outcomes in the building process. The selected projects create a lasting legacy that enable architecture to be accessed more broadly throughout the community. ‘During these strange times we are thrilled to celebrate architecture that continues to challenge the status quo. In -
National Architecture Award Winners 1981 – 2019
NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS WINNERS 1981 - 2019 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARD WINNERS 1 of 81 2019 NATIONAL ARCHITECTURE AWARDS COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Yagan Square (WA) The COLORBOND® Award for Steel Architecture Lyons in collaboration with Iredale Pedersen Hook and landscape architects ASPECT Studios COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE Dangrove (NSW) The Harry Seidler Award for Commercial Architecture Tzannes Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Commercial Architecture Breathe Architecture Private Women’s Club (VIC) National Award for Commercial Architecture Kerstin Thompson Architects EDUCATIONAL ARCHITECTURE Our Lady of the Assumption Catholic Primary School (NSW) The Daryl Jackson Award for Educational Architecture BVN Braemar College Stage 1, Middle School National Award for Educational Architecture Hayball Adelaide Botanic High School (SA) National Commendation for Educational Architecture Cox Architecture and DesignInc QUT Creative Industries Precinct 2 (QLD) National Commendation for Educational Architecture KIRK and HASSELL (Architects in Association) ENDURING ARCHITECTURE Sails in the Desert (NT) National Award for Enduring Architecture Cox Architecture HERITAGE Premier Mill Hotel (WA) The Lachlan Macquarie Award for Heritage Spaceagency architects Paramount House Hotel (NSW) National Award for Heritage Breathe Architecture Flinders Street Station Façade Strengthening & Conservation National Commendation for Heritage (VIC) Lovell Chen Sacred Heart Building Abbotsford Convent Foundation -
Jeff Copolov CV.Pdf
BATES SMART CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION SYNOPSIS / Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology After graduating from RMIT University with Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design a Fellowship Diploma of Interior Design, Jeff began his career as a set designer in the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS television industry. He joined Bates Smart / Member of the Design Institute of Australia in 1983 and in 1995 he became the first / Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia director of interior design at Bates Smart. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE During his career Jeff has been awarded a number of prestigious accolades. In 2003 he Jeffery joined Bates Smart in 1983, received the IDEA Gold Medal for significant becoming an Associate in 1985, an contributions to the design industry and in Associate Director in 1988 and a 2010 he was awarded Designer of the Year Director in 1995. at the IDEA awards. He was inducted into JEFFERY COPOLOV Prior to joining Bates Smart: the Design Institute of Australia’s Hall of DipIntDes, FDIA / ABC Channel 2, Melbourne Fame in 2018, in recognition of outstanding Director / GTV Channel 9, Melbourne contributions to the Australian design industry. Jeff has a classically modern, timeless approach to design and a reputation for producing highly refined and carefully targeted design solutions. He is known for his relentless attention to detail. Regularly working with architectural colleagues from the outset, Jeff oversees the entire design process to craft buildings from the inside out. His broad experience covers a wide range of building types, including commercial, hospitality, residential, retail, education and health, all of which promotes a rich diversity of cross-discipline thought. -
Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens -
Current Job Opportunity Job Title Receptionist Date
Bates Smart Pty Ltd Sydney 43 Brisbane Street Melbourne 1 Nicholson Street ABN 70 004 999 400 Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia T+612 8354 5100 F+612 8354 5199 T+613 8664 6200 F+613 8664 6300 [email protected] [email protected] www.batessmart.com Current Job Opportunity Architecture Interior Design Job Title Receptionist Date Posted 21 January 2020 Urban Design Strategy Location Sydney Reference Code WP/Receptionist Employment Type Full-Time (8:00am-5:00pm) Salary Range $48,000-$55,000 + super Job Description Bates Smart seeks a talented candidate to join our Administration team in Sydney. The successful candidate will have excellent communication skills and have demonstrated the ability to provide excellent customer service or have experience working within a similar role in a corporate environment. As the Receptionist, you will be the first point of contact for all internal and external stakeholders across the business. The Receptionist is responsible for answering all incoming calls and front desk tasks and assisting the EA’s and Events Coordinator with general administration tasks and ensuring the general day-to-day smooth running of all staff amenities. Responsibilities Reception / Brand ambassador for Bates Smart. / Ownership and pride in reception area, maintain high level of presentation. / Receive and transfer all incoming calls. / Meet and greet all visitors and inform staff of arrival. / Open, sort and stamp post and distribute to staff/prepare outgoing post (including international and domestic couriers). / Coordinate and order catering for meetings with upon EA’s instruction. / Reconcile supplier invoices (taxi, courier, flowers etc) / Maintain Cab charge register and monitor usage. -
Porcelanosa Lifestyle Magazine 26
lifestylePORCELANOSA ISSUE NO. 26 / 5 EUROS RAMÓN ESTEVE COOL MEDITERRANEAN CLEAR LINES LWA, NORDIC THOUGHT IN THE WORLD EIGHT BIG BRANDS THE 22ND INTERNACIONAL EXHIBITION BY PORCELANOSA GROUP KELLY HOPPEN DESIGN AS ONE OF THE FINE ARTS CARLOS JIMÉNEZ SENSIBLE ELEGANCE 8TH ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN PRIZES 2015 BY PORCELANOSA GROUP COVER PHOTO: Private swimming pool of one of the villas at the Maalifushi by COMO resort, Maldives. lifestylePORCELANOSA EDITORIAL BOARD Cristina Colonques Francisco Peris EDITORIAL Félix Balado PUBLISHER Ediciones Condé Nast S.A. MANAGING EDITOR Great expectations Sandra del Río ART & DESIGN DIRECTOR Vital R. García Tardn Porcelanosa Group closed its 8th Architecture and Interior TRANSLATORS Design Prizes as a benchmark company in the sector. On a Paloma Gil (English) Geneviève Naud (French) night lit up by the talent of architects and interior designers, Lionbridge (Russian / Polish) Asia Idiomas (Chinese) this project, showcasing eight iconic brands, was consolidated Pichamonch Pintola (Thai) as they managed to surpass their own quality and standards of COPY EDITOR Monique Fuller (English) technology for yet another year. The moving words of Belén COORDINATION Moneo – who was among the prize winners – called for Marta Sahelices (Project Coordinator) Andrea Morán (Print Edition) passion, creativity and the growing involvement of women in Marisa Santamaría and Gema Monroy (Features) the world of architecture. PHOTOGRAPHERS Eight brands showed their best new products at Porcelanosa Esmeralda Álvarez nd PRODUCTION Group’s 22 International Exhibition: an unmissable event Francisco Morote (Director) Rosana Vicente that has made Villarreal the sector’s operational hub, with Juan Ignacio Bocos professionals, artists, designers and businesspeople from all Fernando Bohúa RESEARCH over the world. -
City of Port Phillip Heritage Review
City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Place name: B.A.L.M. Paints Factory Citation No: Administration Building 8 (former) Other names: - Address: 2 Salmon Street, Port Heritage Precinct: None Melbourne Heritage Overlay: HO282 Category: Factory Graded as: Significant Style: Interwar Modernist Victorian Heritage Register: No Constructed: 1937 Designer: Unknown Amendment: C29, C161 Comment: Revised citation Significance What is significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building, to the extent of the building as constructed in 1937 at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, is significant. This is in the European Modernist manner having a plain stuccoed and brick façade with fluted Art Deco parapet treatment and projecting hood to the windows emphasising the horizontality of the composition. There is a tower towards the west end with a flag pole mounted on a tiered base in the Streamlined Moderne mode and porthole motif constituting the key stylistic elements. The brickwork between the windows is extended vertically through the cement window hood in ornamental terminations. Non-original alterations and additions to the building are not significant. How is it significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne is of local historic, architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Port Phillip. City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Citation No: 8 Why is it significant? It is historically important (Criterion A) as evidence of the importance of the locality as part of Melbourne's inner industrial hub during the inter-war period, also recalling the presence of other paint manufacturers at Port Melbourne including Glazebrooks, also in Williamstown Road. -
Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square. -
Victorian Architecture Awards — 2019
Victorian Architecture Awards — 2019 Shortlist Shortlisted projects are listed in alphabetical order by practice name Residential Architecture - Houses (New) Farmer Street | MAArchitects 37 entries / 13 shortlisted projects Clyde Mews | Six Degrees Architects Hawke & King | Six Degrees Architects St Andrews Beach House | Austin Maynard Architects Residential Architecture - Multiple Housing Jury Hawthorn House | Edition Office Richard Middleton (Chair) | HASSELL Bonnie Herring | Breathe Architecture Point Lonsdale House | Edition Office Jesse Linardi | DKO Architecture Ballarat House | Eldridge Anderson Sandy Point House | Kennedy Nolan Residential Architecture - Houses Fitzroy Lane | Kennedy Nolan (Alterations and Additions) Canopy House | Leeton Pointon Architects 35 entries / 14 shortlisted projects & Interiors Springhill House | Lovell Burton South Yarra House | AM Architecture Architecture Cascade House | Atelier Red+Black North Melbourne House | NMBW Grant House | Austin Maynard Architects Architecture Studio Brick & Gable House | Breathe Architecture Daylesford Longhouse | Partners Hill 182 Rose | Fieldwork Bluff House | Rob Kennon Architects LIGHT CORRIDOR HOUSE | Figr House in the Hills | Sean Godsell Architects Storybook House | Folk Architects Cornerstone House | Splinter Society York St Residence | Jackson Clements Architecture Burrows Architects Caroline House | Kennedy Nolan Residential Architecture - Houses (New) Jury Rodney Eggleston (Chair) | March Studio Oak House | Kennedy Nolan Andrew Simpson | Andrew Simpson Architects -
1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2
1 Engineering Heritage Victoria Nomination for Recognition Engineering Heritage Australia Recognition Program 1956 Olympic Swimming & Diving Stadium July 2016 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 2 CAPTION FOR COVER PHOTOGRAPH This shows the North West Elevation of the Stadium as completed in 1956 Photo: Wolfgang Sievers (State Library of Victoria picture collection) 1956 Olympic Swimming and Diving Stadium Nomination for Engineering Heritage Nomination 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction………………………………………......................................................5-7 2.0 Heritage Assessment .....……… ………….....................................................................7 2.1 Basic Data............................................................................................................7 2.1.1Item Name.......……………………………………….............................................7 2.1.2 Other/Former Name………………………………………...................................7 2.1. 3 Location………………………………………………………………………..........7 2.1.4 Address……………………………………….......................................................7 2.1.5 Suburb/ Nearest Town.......………………………………………………………...7 2.1.6 State……………………………………………………………………………….7 2.1.7 Local Government Area………………………………………………………..7 2.1.8 Owner……………………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.9 Current Use……………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.10 Former Use……………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.11 Designer………………………………………………………………………...7 2.1.12 Maker/Builder…………………………………………………………………..7 2.1.13 Year Started…………………………………………………………………….7