Blackberry Cultivars for Oregon EC 1617 • Revised January 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Marion Berree Oregon
MARION BERREE OREGON The Marionberry was developed by the USDA Agricultural Research Service at Oregon State University Total acidity: 1.39 in Corvallis, Oregon. The berry was PH: 3.35 released in 1956 under the name Alcohol %: 12 Marion, after the county where it was Residual Sugar: 8.7% tested extensively. Oregon produces Production: 212 cases between 28 million and 33 million 12 / 375 ml cases pounds annually, with Marion County and Willamette Valley collectively accounting for over 90 percent of When there is just enough current production. The Marionberry sweetness to balance the has a somewhat tart flavor, fairly naturally high acidity found in earthy with traces of sweetness. It is Marionberry, we achieve that larger, sweeter and juicier than the wonderful aroma and taste of ‘Evergreen’ blackberry. The relative freshly picked fruit. complexity of its flavor has led to a marketing label as the “Cabernet of Oak Knoll’s berry wines take the Blackberries.” While the Oregon wine category of “berry wine” to a industry is largely known for its high new height. Fine wine shops and quality Pinot Noirs, Pinot Gris, and restaurants seek out these wines Chardonnays, it is by no means limited for their pure, concentrated to those esteemed varietal wines. depth of flavor, and their ability to match exquisitely with a The key element to the success of wide range of desserts. An our Marionberry wine is its precise alternative to late harvest wine, sugar - acid balance. Many fruit or port, or sherry, our berry wines berry wines are simply too sweet. The are a delight to anyone who excessive sweetness is cloying and enjoys the true essence of this masks the wine’s true fruit flavors. -
Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the Book Series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources Ed C
Volume 6 (Relatives of Temperate Fruits) of the book series, "Wild Crop Relatives: Genetic, Genomic and Breeding Resources ed C. Kole 2011 p179-197 9 Rubus J. Graham* and M. Woodhead Scottish Crop Research Institute, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Rosaceae family consists of around 3, 000 species of which 500 belong to the genus Rubus. Ploidy levels range from diploid to dodecaploid with a genomic number of 7, and members can be difficult to classify into distinct species due to hybridization and apomixes. Species are distributed widely across Asia, Europe, North and South America with the center of diversity now considered to be in China, where there are 250-700 species of Rubus depending on the taxonomists. Rubus species are an important horticultural source of income and labor being produced for the fresh and processing markets for their health benefits. Blackberries and raspberries have a relatively short history of less than a century as cultivated crops that have been enhanced through plant breeding and they are only a few generations removed from their wild progenitor species. Rubus sp. are typically found as early colonizers of disturbed sites such as pastures, along forest edges, in forest clearings and along roadsides. Blackberries are typically much more tolerant of drought, flooding and high temperatures, while red raspberries are more tolerant of cold winters. Additionally, they exhibit vigorous vegetative reproduction by either tip layering or root suckering, permitting Rubus genotypes to cover large areas. The attractiveness of the fruits to frugivores, especially birds, means that seed dispersal can be widespread with the result that Rubus genotypes can very easily be spread to new sites and are very effective, high-speed invaders. -
Analysis of Flavonoids in Rubus Erythrocladus and Morus Nigra Leaves Extracts by Liquid Chromatography and Capillary Electrophor
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 25 (2015) 219–227 www.sbfgnosia.org.br/revista Original Article Analysis of flavonoids in Rubus erythrocladus and Morus nigra leaves extracts by liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis a a b c Luciana R. Tallini , Graziele P.R. Pedrazza , Sérgio A. de L. Bordignon , Ana C.O. Costa , d e a,∗ Martin Steppe , Alexandre Fuentefria , José A.S. Zuanazzi a Departamento de Produc¸ ão de Matéria Prima, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil b Centro Universitário La Salle, Canoas, RS, Brazil c Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil d Departamento de Produc¸ ão e Controle de Medicamentos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil e Departamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil a a b s t r a c t r t i c l e i n f o Article history: This study uses high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis as analytical tools Received 15 January 2015 to evaluate flavonoids in hydrolyzed leaves extracts of Rubus erythrocladus Mart., Rosaceae, and Morus Accepted 30 April 2015 nigra L., Moraceae. For phytochemical analysis, the extracts were prepared by acid hydrolysis and ultra- Available online 17 June 2015 sonic bath and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector and by capillary electrophoresis equipped with a diode-array detector. Quercetin and kaempferol were iden- Keywords: tified in these extracts. The analytical methods developed were validated and applied. -
U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUILLAJA EXTRACT, 02/02/2009
) Heather R. Bjornson, Regulatory Agent rES 022009 Technology Sciences Group, Inc. 1150 18th Street, N.W. Ste.1000 Washington, DC 20036 Subject:. Quillaja Extract EPA Registration No. 82572-1 Label and CSF Amendment Application Dated September 15, 2008 Dear Ms. Bjornson: The amendment referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under FIFRA section 3(c)(5), is acceptable provided that you: 1. Submit and/or cite all data required for registration/reregistration of your product under FIFRA section 3(c)(5) when the Agency requires all registrants of similar products to submit such data. 2. Submit three (3) copies of your final printed labeling before you release the product for shipment. Final printed labeling means the label or labeling of the product when distributed or sold. Clearly legible reproductions or photo reductions will be accepted for unusual labels, such as those silk-screened directly onto glass or metal containers or large bags or drum labels. If these conditions are not complied with, the registration will be subject to cancellation in accordance with FIFRA section 6(b ). Your release for shipment of the product bearing the amended labeling constitutes acceptance of these conditions. If you have any questions contact John Fournier at 703-308-0169 or by email at: [email protected]. A stamped copy of the label is enclosed for your records. Sincerely, Linda A. Hollis, Chief Biochemical Pesticides Branch Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P) Enclosures Lf}-Y!?~~~ 75/( P )-thA-V''''l; err-- P<. 7:::r'iU1 Dr ) Quillaja Extract A Bio-Pesticide For Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes and Plant Parasitic Fungi in Vineyards, Orchards, Field Crops, Turf and Ornamentals Active Ingredient: 'Saponins 6f Quillaja saponaria ........ -
US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, QUILLAJA EXTRACT,03/09/2018
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1^1 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION March 9, 2018 Jacob S. Moore Regulatory Consultant Agent for Desert King Chile, Ltd. c/o Technology Sciences Group, Inc. 712 Fifth Street, Suite. A Davis, CA 95616 Subject: Labeling Notification per Pesticide Registration Notice (PRN) 98-10 — Update label to include statement “See inside booklet for additional precautionary statements, directions for use and storage and disposal.” Product Name: Quillaja Extract EPA Registration Number: 82572-1 Application Date: February 15, 2018 OPP Decision Number: 538508 Dear Mr. Moore: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in receipt of your application for notification under Pesticide Registration Notice (PRN) 98-10 for the above referenced product. The Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) has conducted a review of this request for its applicability under PRN 98-10 and finds that the action requested falls within the scope of PRN 98-10. The labeling submitted with this application has been stamped ‘'Notification” and will be placed in our records. You must submit one (1) copy of the final printed labeling with the modifications. Should you wish to add/retain a reference to your company’s website on your label, then please be aware that the website becomes labeling under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and is subject to review by the EPA. If the website is false or misleading, the product will be considered to be misbranded and sale or distribution of the product is unlawful under FIFRA section 12(a)(1)(E). -
Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales -
F a C T S H E E T Blackberries
JEFFERSON COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD F A C T S H E E T BLACKBERRIES Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) Himalayan blackberry stems (canes) can grow to 9 feet in height but often trail along the ground, growing 20-40 feet long. Thorns grow along the stems as well as on the leaves and leaf stalks. Himalayan blackberries have five distinct leaflets; each leaflet has a toothed margin and is generally oval in shape. Canes start producing berries in their second year. Himalayan blackberry can be evergreen, depending on the site. Rose family. Himalayan blackberry Himalayan blackberry Evergreen blackberry The leaflets of evergreen blackberry are deeply lobed, making it easy to distinguish from WHY BE CONCERNED? Himalayan blackberry. Both Himalayan and evergreen DISTRIBUTION: blackberries form impenetrable Himalayan blackberry is extremely visible in thickets, consisting of both dead and most of Jefferson County, growing along live canes. These thickets out-compete roadsides, over fences and other vegetation, and native vegetation and are a good invading many open areas. Evergreen source of food and shelter for rats. blackberry is more common in the West end of the county, where it has been seen to invade Both Himalayan and evergreen riparian areas. blackberries are Class C Weeds 380 Jefferson Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 379-5610 Ext. 205 [email protected] http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/WeedBoard ECOLOGY: . Seeds can be spread by birds, humans and other mammals. The canes often cascade outwards, forming mounds, and can root at the tip when they hit the ground, expanding the infestation . -
No Slide Title
“Wild” Blackberries Blackberries for the Home Garden Rubus laciniatus Rubus ursinus ‘Evergreen’ Dr. Bernadine Strik, Professor of Horticulture The only true PNW native Introduced in 1800’s Extension Berry Crops Specialist Oregon State University Rubus armeniacus ‘Himalaya’ Introduced in 1800’s Male plant female plant Aggregate fruit of many Terminology: Fruiting Lateral drupelets calyx Marion during harvest drupelet Drupelet: Section of a berry Each has a seed The receptacle is part of the “berry” fruit we eat Primocanes Floricanes First year Second year Sliced blackberry fruit Always vegetative Always fruiting Floricanes at budbreak Blackberries Three types of blackberries: Erect e.g. ‘Ouachita’ Marion Trailing e.g. ‘Marion’ ‘Boysen’ ’ http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/ Semi-erect Ouachita e.g. ‘Triple Crown’ Triple Crown Bernadine Strik, Professor, Oregon State University 1 Trailing Blackberries Planting Establishment: Trailing Blackberries • Cultivars include – Marion, Obsidian, Black Diamond, Columbia Star – Hybrids: Boysen, Logan • Fruit tend to be oblong, have relatively small seeds, and have a highly aromatic, good flavor • Fruit from late June through August, depending on cultivar Trailing blackberry Trailing Blackberries Primocanes are not tipped/pruned in summer Every-year production: Floricanes trained on wires Plant 3.5 to 5 ft apart At harvest time Rows 10 ft apart Install trellis in planting year (wires at 6 ft & 4.5 ft) Train primocanes as they grow Hoop for training new primocanes Trailing blackberries Trailing -
Rubus Idaeus (Raspberry ) Size/Shape
Rubus idaeus (raspberry ) Raspberry is an upright deciduous shrub.The shrub has thorns be careful. It ha pinatelly compound leaves with a toothed edge. The plant has two different types of shoots ( canes) One which produces fruits in the given year and one which grows leaves only but will be the next year productive shoot. The fruits are small but very juicy. It grows best in full fun and moderately fertile soil. The best to grow raspberry in a raised bed or in area where any frame or trellis can be put around the plants , otherwise it will fall on the ground. Landscape Information French Name: Framboisier, ﻋﻠﻴﻖ ﺃﺣﻤﺮ :Arabic Name Plant Type: Shrub Origin: North America, Europe, Asia Heat Zones: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Hardiness Zones: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Uses: Screen, Border Plant, Mass Planting, Edible, Wildlife Size/Shape Growth Rate: Fast Tree Shape: Upright Canopy Symmetry: Symmetrical Plant Image Canopy Density: Medium Canopy Texture: Medium Height at Maturity: 1 to 1.5 m Spread at Maturity: 1 to 1.5 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 2 to 5 Years Rubus idaeus (raspberry ) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Alternate Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Deciduous Leaf Type: Odd Pinnately compund Leaf Blade: 5 - 10 cm Leaf Shape: Ovate Leaf Margins: Double Serrate Leaf Textures: Rough Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Flower Image Color(changing season): Brown Flower Flower Showiness: True Flower Size Range: 1.5 - 3 Flower Type: Raceme Flower Sexuality: Monoecious (Bisexual) Flower Scent: No Fragance Flower Color: -
2013 BGSS Abstract Book UPDATED
th 26 Annual Biology Graduate Student Symposium Program and Abstracts Oregon State University Mark O. Hatfield Marine Science Center Newport, Oregon March 2nd, 2013 Table of Contents Page Message from 2013 Organizing Committee 1 Acknowledgements 2 General Information 2 Schedule of Talks 3 Keynote Speaker 4 Oral Presentation Abstracts 4 Poster Presentation Abstracts 10 Map of the Hatfield Marine Science Center (HMSC) 13 Directions to the Rental House from HMSC 14 Message from the 2013 Organizing Committee th Welcome to the 26 Annual Biology Graduate Student Symposium! This conference, organized by and for graduate students, brings together students from all the life science departments at Oregon State University. It is a forum to share research with our peers and to facilitate a better appreciation of the breadth of biological investigation that occurs at our university. This gathering is an opportunity to broaden our outlook on the study of biology; to discuss graduate life and current events; and encourage interactions between future researchers in the various life sciences. We hope you have a productive conference and that you will bring away a positive experience to share with other students. 2013 Organizing Committee Casey Benkwitt Elizabeth Cerny-Chipman Cammie Crowder Emily Hartfield Tye Kindinger Sheila Kitchen Dani Long Trang Nguyen Jessie Reimer Chenchen Shen Hannah Tavalire 1 Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the support of the following sponsors: OSU Departments: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Department of Zoology College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences College of Education College of Science Graduate School Venue: Hatfield Marine Science Center of Oregon State University Refreshments and Food: First Alternative Co-Op Fred Meyer Rogue Brewery Safeway General Information Presentations: The symposium will take place in the Auditorium at the Hatfield Marine Science Center (HMSC) (map – p. -
Here Are Over 2,100 Native Rare Plant Finds at 11 Bear Run Nature Plant Species in Pennsylvania, and About Reserve 800 Species Are of Conservation Concern
Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program informationinformation forfor thethe conservationconservation ofof biodiversitybiodiversity WILD HERITAGE NEWS Summer 2018 Tough Nuts to Crack Inside This Issue Zeroing in on Some of Our Most Mysterious Plant Species by Tough Nuts to Crack 1 Jessica McPherson Emerging Invasive 6 Scientific understanding of our native Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Plant Threats biodiversity is a constant work in progress. The stories of some of these species EYE Con Summer 8 We continue to uncover the intricacies of illustrate the interesting complexities of Camp our native plant species habitat our native diversity, some trends in Spotted Turtle 8 requirements, biological needs, and conservation, and some of the data gaps Conservation ecological interrelationships such as animal that often challenge our ability to assess State Park Vernal Pool 9 pollinators and seed dispersers. To the conservation needs of plant species. Surveys determine the conservation needs of our native species, the Natural Heritage Netted Chain Fern New Cooperative Weed 9 Program synthesizes the best available The netted chain fern (Woodwardia Management Area science on what we know a species needs areolata) was previously known almost Tick Borne Disease 10 to survive with population data and information exclusively from the coastal plain in Collaboration on any threats it faces. For plants, the Pennsylvania, but new field work suggests Indian Creek Caverns 11 sheer numbers of species pose a significant challenge; there are over 2,100 native Rare Plant Finds at 11 Bear Run Nature plant species in Pennsylvania, and about Reserve 800 species are of conservation concern. Mudpuppy Project 12 The Plant Status Update Project Spring Insect Survey 13 completed in 2016, was a focused Photo Highlights investigation of 56 plant species that DCNR determined lacked sufficient data to evaluate the appropriate conservation Photo Banner: status. -
Factors Influencing Fruit Bud Formation and Yield of the Marion Blackberry
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Willis Arden Sheets for the Master of Science in Horticulture (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date thesis is presented April 27, 1967 Title FACTORS INFLUENCING FRUIT BUD FORMATION AND YIELD OF THE MARION BLACKBERRY Abstract approved Mg^or Professor ^ In 1960 tests were initiated on the Marion blackberry (Rubus hybrid) to study the effect of (1) plant spacing, (2) time of training canes to the trellis and (3) amount of cane to train to the trellis with regard to fruit bud formation and total yield. Plant spacing varied with 2.5, 5 and 10 feet between plants in the row. Time of training the canes to the trellis was approximately the middle of the months of August, September, October and February. The amount of cane trained on the trellis was either the entire length of all sound canes or only enough of each cane to reach the adjacent plant. Total yield of fruit, fruit spur determinations, time of fruit bud formation, leaf size and number and carbohydrate:nitrogen ratio of leaves were studied and/or measured. Although yield differences were greatest in the early years of the planting, 4-year averages indicate that closer spacing of plants resulted in highly significant increases. August-trained canes produced the highest yields, followed in order by February, September and October. Differences in yield between the length of canes trained were very small and generally non-significant. When more cane grox<rth was trained, a corresponding increase in training time was required, particularly at the closer plant spacings. August and Septembet training of canes stimulated the axillary buds to elongate and produce lateral growth.