Here Are Over 2,100 Native Rare Plant Finds at 11 Bear Run Nature Plant Species in Pennsylvania, and About Reserve 800 Species Are of Conservation Concern
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analysis of Flavonoids in Rubus Erythrocladus and Morus Nigra Leaves Extracts by Liquid Chromatography and Capillary Electrophor
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 25 (2015) 219–227 www.sbfgnosia.org.br/revista Original Article Analysis of flavonoids in Rubus erythrocladus and Morus nigra leaves extracts by liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis a a b c Luciana R. Tallini , Graziele P.R. Pedrazza , Sérgio A. de L. Bordignon , Ana C.O. Costa , d e a,∗ Martin Steppe , Alexandre Fuentefria , José A.S. Zuanazzi a Departamento de Produc¸ ão de Matéria Prima, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil b Centro Universitário La Salle, Canoas, RS, Brazil c Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil d Departamento de Produc¸ ão e Controle de Medicamentos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil e Departamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil a a b s t r a c t r t i c l e i n f o Article history: This study uses high performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis as analytical tools Received 15 January 2015 to evaluate flavonoids in hydrolyzed leaves extracts of Rubus erythrocladus Mart., Rosaceae, and Morus Accepted 30 April 2015 nigra L., Moraceae. For phytochemical analysis, the extracts were prepared by acid hydrolysis and ultra- Available online 17 June 2015 sonic bath and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector and by capillary electrophoresis equipped with a diode-array detector. Quercetin and kaempferol were iden- Keywords: tified in these extracts. The analytical methods developed were validated and applied. -
Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
$10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon. -
F a C T S H E E T Blackberries
JEFFERSON COUNTY NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL BOARD F A C T S H E E T BLACKBERRIES Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) and evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) Himalayan blackberry stems (canes) can grow to 9 feet in height but often trail along the ground, growing 20-40 feet long. Thorns grow along the stems as well as on the leaves and leaf stalks. Himalayan blackberries have five distinct leaflets; each leaflet has a toothed margin and is generally oval in shape. Canes start producing berries in their second year. Himalayan blackberry can be evergreen, depending on the site. Rose family. Himalayan blackberry Himalayan blackberry Evergreen blackberry The leaflets of evergreen blackberry are deeply lobed, making it easy to distinguish from WHY BE CONCERNED? Himalayan blackberry. Both Himalayan and evergreen DISTRIBUTION: blackberries form impenetrable Himalayan blackberry is extremely visible in thickets, consisting of both dead and most of Jefferson County, growing along live canes. These thickets out-compete roadsides, over fences and other vegetation, and native vegetation and are a good invading many open areas. Evergreen source of food and shelter for rats. blackberry is more common in the West end of the county, where it has been seen to invade Both Himalayan and evergreen riparian areas. blackberries are Class C Weeds 380 Jefferson Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 379-5610 Ext. 205 [email protected] http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/WeedBoard ECOLOGY: . Seeds can be spread by birds, humans and other mammals. The canes often cascade outwards, forming mounds, and can root at the tip when they hit the ground, expanding the infestation . -
Rubus Idaeus (Raspberry ) Size/Shape
Rubus idaeus (raspberry ) Raspberry is an upright deciduous shrub.The shrub has thorns be careful. It ha pinatelly compound leaves with a toothed edge. The plant has two different types of shoots ( canes) One which produces fruits in the given year and one which grows leaves only but will be the next year productive shoot. The fruits are small but very juicy. It grows best in full fun and moderately fertile soil. The best to grow raspberry in a raised bed or in area where any frame or trellis can be put around the plants , otherwise it will fall on the ground. Landscape Information French Name: Framboisier, ﻋﻠﻴﻖ ﺃﺣﻤﺮ :Arabic Name Plant Type: Shrub Origin: North America, Europe, Asia Heat Zones: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Hardiness Zones: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Uses: Screen, Border Plant, Mass Planting, Edible, Wildlife Size/Shape Growth Rate: Fast Tree Shape: Upright Canopy Symmetry: Symmetrical Plant Image Canopy Density: Medium Canopy Texture: Medium Height at Maturity: 1 to 1.5 m Spread at Maturity: 1 to 1.5 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 2 to 5 Years Rubus idaeus (raspberry ) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Alternate Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Deciduous Leaf Type: Odd Pinnately compund Leaf Blade: 5 - 10 cm Leaf Shape: Ovate Leaf Margins: Double Serrate Leaf Textures: Rough Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Flower Image Color(changing season): Brown Flower Flower Showiness: True Flower Size Range: 1.5 - 3 Flower Type: Raceme Flower Sexuality: Monoecious (Bisexual) Flower Scent: No Fragance Flower Color: -
Identification of Bioactive Phytochemicals in Mulberries
H OH metabolites OH Article Identification of Bioactive Phytochemicals in Mulberries Gilda D’Urso 1 , Jurriaan J. Mes 2, Paola Montoro 1 , Robert D. Hall 3,4 and Ric C.H. de Vos 3,* 1 Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano SA, Italy; [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (P.M.) 2 Business Unit Fresh Food and Chains, Wageningen Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 WG Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Business Unit Bioscience, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-317480841 Received: 29 November 2019; Accepted: 18 December 2019; Published: 20 December 2019 Abstract: Mulberries are consumed either freshly or as processed fruits and are traditionally used to tackle several diseases, especially type II diabetes. Here, we investigated the metabolite compositions of ripe fruits of both white (Morus alba) and black (Morus nigra) mulberries, using reversed-phase HPLC coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and related these to their in vitro antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. Based on accurate masses, fragmentation data, UV/Vis light absorbance spectra and retention times, 35 metabolites, mainly comprising phenolic compounds and amino sugar acids, were identified. While the antioxidant activity was highest in M. nigra, the α-glucosidase inhibitory activities were similar between species. Both bioactivities were mostly resistant to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. To identify the bioactive compounds, we combined LC-MS with 96-well-format fractionation followed by testing the individual fractions for α-glucosidase inhibition, while compounds responsible for the antioxidant activity were identified using HPLC with an online antioxidant detection system. -
Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species Through Southeastern
Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States June and July 2007 Glassy Mountain, South Carolina Participants: Kim E. Hummer, Research Leader, Curator, USDA ARS NCGR 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521 phone 541.738.4201 [email protected] Chad E. Finn, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, Oregon 97330 phone 541.738.4037 [email protected] Michael Dossett Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97330 phone 541.738.4038 [email protected] Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crops through the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements:................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Part I – Southeastern United States ...................................................................................... 5 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 Travelog May-June 2007.................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions for part 1 ..................................................................................................... -
Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated
Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, October 18). Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rubusarcticussspacaulis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, in particular Bonnie Heidel, and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Anderson, for their generosity in making their records available. The data provided by Lynn Black of the DAO Herbarium and National Vascular Plant Identification Service in Ontario, Marta Donovan and Jenifer Penny of the British Columbia Conservation Data Center, Jane Bowles of University of Western Ontario Herbarium, Dr. Kadri Karp of the Aianduse Instituut in Tartu, Greg Karow of the Bighorn National Forest, Cathy Seibert of the University of Montana Herbarium, Dr. Anita Cholewa of the University of Minnesota Herbarium, Dr. Debra Trock of the Michigan State University Herbarium, John Rintoul of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, and Prof. Ron Hartman and Joy Handley of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium at Laramie, were all very valuable in producing this assessment. -
Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge
Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region August 2008 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN MERRITT ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Brevard and Volusia Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 3 U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 4 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 4 Legal Policy Context ..................................................................................................................... 5 National Conservation Plans and Initiatives .................................................................................6 Relationship to State Partners ..................................................................................................... -
DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Anacardiaceae Sumac Family
FLOWERINGPLANTS Lamiaceae Mint family (ANGIOSPERMS) Brassicaceae Mustard family Prunella vulgaris - Self Heal Cardamine nutallii - Spring Beauty Satureja douglasii – Yerba Buena Rubiaceae Madder family DICOTS Galium aparine- Cleavers Boraginaceae Borage family Malvaceae Mallow family Galium trifidum – Small Bedstraw Aceraceae Maple family Cynoglossum grande – Houndstongue Sidalcea virgata – Rose Checker Mallow Acer macrophyllum – Big leaf Maple Oleaceae Olive family MONOCOTS Anacardiaceae Sumac family Fraxinus latifolia - Oregon Ash Toxicodendron diversilobum – Poison Oak Cyperaceae Sedge family Plantaginaceae Plantain family Carex densa Apiaceae Carrot family Plantago lanceolata – Plantain Anthriscus caucalis- Bur Chervil Iridaceae Iris family Daucus carota – Wild Carrot Portulacaceae Purslane family Iris tenax – Oregon Iris Ligusticum apiifolium – Parsley-leaved Claytonia siberica – Candy Flower Lovage Claytonia perforliata – Miner’s Lettuce Juncaceae Rush family Osmorhiza berteroi–Sweet Cicely Juncus tenuis – Slender Rush Sanicula graveolens – Sierra Sanicle Cynoglossum Photo by C.Gautier Ranunculaceae Buttercup family Delphinium menziesii – Larkspur Liliaceae Lily family Asteraceae Sunflower family Caryophyllaceae Pink family Ranunculus occidentalis – Western Buttercup Allium acuminatum – Hooker’s Onion Achillea millefolium – Yarrow Stellaria media- Chickweed Ranunculus uncinatus – Small-flowered Calochortus tolmiei – Tolmie’s Mariposa Lily Adendocaulon bicolor – Pathfinder Buttercup Camassia quamash - Camas Bellis perennis – English -
Edibles Shrubstrees for Sale
# Common Name Latin Name 1 Saskatoon Serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia 'Regent' 2 Juneberry Amelanchier alnifolia 'Northline' 3 Juneberry Amelanchier alnifolia 'Smoky' 4 Juneberry Amelanchier alnifolia 'Smoky' 5 Shadblow Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis 'Prince William' 6 Shadblow Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis 'Success' 7 Running Serviceberry Amelanchier stolonifera 'Fergie' 8 Serviceberry Amelanchier grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' 9 Black Chokeberry Aronia melanocarpa 'Nero' 10 PawPaw Asimina triloba unknown 11 PawPaw Michigan cultivar 12 PawPaw Asimina triloba 'Wilson' 13 PawPaw Asimina triloba 'Sunflower' 14 Cornelian Cherry Cornus mas unknown 15 Cornelian Cherry Cornus mas 'Pioneer' 16 Cornelian Cherry Cornus mas 'Elegant' 17 Cornelian Cherry Cornus mas 'Yellow' 18 American Filbert (Hazelnut) Corylus americana 'Winkler' 19 American Hazelnut Corylus americana (AMHA_PP_18‐24) 20 American Hazelnut Corylus americana 'Ecos' 21 American Hazelnut Corylus americana 'Precocious' 22 Hazelbert Corylus 'Winkler' x 'Skinner' 23 Contorted filbert Corylus avellana 'contorta' 24 Hybrid Hazelnut Corylus avellana x Americana 25 Gumi/Cherry Elaeagnus Elaeagnus multiflora 'Red Gem' 26 Autumn Olive Bush Elaeagnus umbellata 'garnet 27 Hawthorne Hawthorne pinnatifida 'Big Golden Star' 28 Sea Buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides 'Golden Sweet Female' 29 Sea Buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides 'Hergo Female' 30 Blue Honeysuckle Lonicera caerulea edulis 'Blue Pacific' 31 Blue Honeysuckle Lonicera caerulea edulis 'Kamchatka' 32 Medlar Mespilus germanica 'Breda -
NLI Recommended Plant List for the Mountains
NLI Recommended Plant List for the Mountains Notable Features Requirement Exposure Native Hardiness USDA Max. Mature Height Max. Mature Width Very Wet Very Dry Drained Moist &Well Occasionally Dry Botanical Name Common Name Recommended Cultivars Zones Tree Deciduous Large (Height: 40'+) Acer rubrum red maple 'October Glory'/ 'Red Sunset' fall color Shade/sun x 2-9 75' 45' x x x fast growing, mulit-stemmed, papery peeling Betula nigra river birch 'Heritage® 'Cully'/ 'Dura Heat'/ 'Summer Cascade' bark, play props Shade/part sun x 4-8 70' 60' x x x Celtis occidentalis hackberry tough, drought tolerant, graceful form Full sun x 2-9 60' 60' x x x Fagus grandifolia american beech smooth textured bark, play props Shade/part sun x 3-8 75' 60' x x Fraxinus americana white ash fall color Full sun/part shade x 3-9 80' 60' x x x Ginkgo biloba ginkgo; maidenhair tree 'Autumn Gold'/ 'The President' yellow fall color Full sun 3-9 70' 40' x x good dappled shade, fall color, quick growing, Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis thornless honey locust Shademaster®/ Skyline® salt tolerant, tolerant of acid, alkaline, wind. Full sun/part shade x 3-8 75' 50' x x Liriodendron tulipifera tulip poplar fall color, quick growth rate, play props, Full sun x 4-9 90' 50' x Platanus x acerifolia sycamore, planetree 'Bloodgood' play props, peeling bark Full sun x 4-9 90' 70' x x x Quercus palustris pin oak play props, good fall color, wet tolerant Full sun x 4-8 80' 50' x x x Tilia cordata Little leaf Linden, Basswood 'Greenspire' Full sun/part shade 3-7 60' 40' x x Ulmus -
Himalayan Blackberry Rubus Discolor Weihe & Nees
Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees Synonyms: Rubus armeniacus Focke, R. fruticosus L., R. procerus auct. non P.J. Muell. ex Genev, Rubus procerus P.J. Muell. Other common names: Himalaya berry Family: Rosaceae Invasiveness Rank: 77 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description Similar species: There are several species of native Himalayan blackberry is a perennial bramble with stems blackberries and raspberries that could be confused with that grow up to 9 meters long. Stems live two or three Himalayan blackberry. Himalayan blackberry can be years, frequently root at the tips, are very strongly distinguished from similar, native Rubus species by the angled rather than round, and have large, curved spines. presence of five leaflets per leaf, strongly angled and Leaves are palmately compound and usually have five furrowed stems, and curved prickles with wide bases leaflets. Leaflets are large, broad, oblong, 6 ¼ to 13 cm (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1961, Hultén 1968, Viereck long, and sharply toothed with bright green, smooth and Little 1972). upper surfaces and grayish, hairy lower surfaces. Inflorescences are branched and consist of five to twenty flowers. Flowers are white to rose in color and up to 2 ½ cm in diameter. Fruits are succulent, and they turn from red to shiny black as they mature (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1961, Hoshovsky 2000).