DOCSLIB.ORG

Radiocarbon Dating the Early Neolithic on Islands Within the ‘Western Seaways’ of Britain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radiocarbon Dating the Early Neolithic on Islands Within the ‘Western Seaways’ of Britain Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, page 1 of 39 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/ppr.2017.4 Stepping Stones to the Neolithic? Radiocarbon Dating the Early Neolithic on Islands Within the ‘Western Seaways’ of Britain By DUNCAN GARROW1, SEREN GRIFFITHS2, HUGO ANDERSON-WHYMARK3 and FRASER STURT4 The western seaways – an arc of sea stretching from the Channel Islands in the south, up through the Isles of Scilly, the Isle of Man, and the Outer Hebrides to Orkney in the north – have long been seen as crucial to our understanding of the processes which led to the arrival of the Neolithic in Britain and Ireland in the centuries around 4000 cal BC. The western seaways have not, however, been considered in detail within any of the recent studies addressing the radiocarbon chronology of the earliest Neolithic in that wider region. This paper presents a synthesis of all existing 5th and 4th millennia cal BC radiocarbon dates from islands within the western seaways, including 50 new results obtained specifically for this study. While the focus here is insular in a literal sense, the project’s results have far reaching implications for our understanding of the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in Britain and Ireland and beyond. The findings broadly fitwellwiththeGathering Time model of Whittle et al., suggesting that the earliest dated Neolithic in this zone falls into the c. 3900–3700 cal BC bracket. However, it is also noted that our current chronological understanding is based on comparatively few dates spread across a large area. Consequently, it is suggested that both further targeted work and an approach that incorporates an element of typo-chronology (as well as absolute dating) is necessary if we are to move forward our understanding of the processes associated with the appearance of the first Neolithic material culture and practices in this key region. Keywords: Mesolithic, Neolithic, Mesolithic–Neolithic transition, radiocarbon dating, islands, maritime archaeology, western seaways INTRODUCTION focused on the processes by which Neolithic practices The manner in which ‘the Neolithic’ arrived in Britain arrived in Britain and Ireland from continental and Ireland was a topic of debate throughout the Europe. The main issue under consideration has been 20th century (eg, Case 1969; Kinnes 1988; see Thomas the relationship between, and relative roles played by, 2013 and Anderson-Whymark & Garrow 2015 for incoming ‘Neolithic’ migrants/colonists from the recent reviews). In the early 21st century, there has continent and the indigenous ‘Mesolithic’ populations been a significant resurgence of interest in the issue (eg, of Britain and Ireland. For a long while, this debate Sheridan 2010; Whittle et al. 2011; Thomas 2013). could be characterised as one between those arguing Most discussions since the early 20th century have for substantial colonisation from the continent (eg, Sheridan 2010) versus those arguing that the 1Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, indigenous population had been almost exclusively Reading RG6 6AB Email: [email protected] responsible for the transition (eg, Thomas 2008). 2 School of Forensic and Applied Sciences, University of More recently, however, it has become increasingly Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE common for interpretations to stress a combination of 3Department of Archaeology, University of York, York Y01 7EP the two (eg, Garrow & Sturt 2011; Whittle et al. 2011, 4Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton 861; Cummings & Harris 2011; Thomas 2013, SO17 1BF 423–4; Anderson-Whymark & Garrow 2015). 1 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. NETSCC, on 13 Oct 2017 at 14:36:42, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2017.4 THE PREHISTORIC SOCIETY RECENT CHRONOLOGIES OF THE One year later, Whittle et al. (2011) published their MESOLITHIC–NEOLITHIC TRANSITION study of the radiocarbon evidence for causewayed Over the past few years, in addition to these long- enclosures in Britain and Ireland, and radiocarbon standing discussions of process, the chronology of the dates associated with Early Neolithic material culture Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in Britain and Ireland in selected regions, in their substantial Gathering Time has received a great deal of attention – primarily as a volume. While the primary focus of this project was result of new syntheses and different interpretations causewayed enclosures, work by Whittle et al. on the of the radiocarbon evidence. Discussions of chrono- wider context within which these monuments were logical data, both in terms of approaches to the first constructed enabled them to consider the arrival evidence and the interpretation of chronologically of ‘Neolithic things and practices’ (as they put it) diagnostic material culture from key sites, have been in Britain and Ireland more generally (Fig. 1). Their central. Different readings of these evidence sets have study – involving a corpus of 2350 heavily scrutinised led to sometimes radically different interpretations. radiocarbon dates – ensured that Gathering Time Critical to all of these discussions are not just their introduced a new quality of understanding in relation uses of chronological evidence, but also the way in to the timing and tempo of change. Whittle et al. which they draw the evidence from different regions suggested that the earliest signs of the Neolithic in into wider models in an attempt to understand the Britain and Ireland arrived in south-east England processes of transition. probably in the 41st century cal BC; ‘the Neolithic’ In 2010, Sheridan presented a four-strand ‘Neo- then spread across central southern England over the lithisation’ model drawing on previous work (eg, next two centuries, followed by an especially rapid Sheridan 2000; 2003; 2004; 2007; see Fig. 1). The first and extensive phase of expansion right across two phases involved a ‘false start’ of contact between Britain and Ireland in the decades around 3800 cal BC west and north-west France and south-west Ireland (Whittle et al. 2011, 836). c. 4500–4250 and a Breton/‘Atlantic’ strand of contact Subsequent to the publication of Gathering Time, between western France and western Britain/northern new evidence from Ireland, examining indicators for Ireland c. 4300–4000 BC (Sheridan 2010, 91–101). early farming practices and for the construction of Sheridan’s model included only a small number of Neolithic houses, also suggests a distinct disjuncture radiocarbon dates, foregrounding the monument and in terms of practices in the 38th century cal BC ceramic typo-chronologies of France, Britain, and (McClatchie et al. 2014). Evidence from other regions Ireland to develop a spatio-temporal narrative of of Britain (the Midlands, the north of England, and Neolithic introductions. north Wales), studied in parallel with Whittle et al., In the same year, Collard et al. (2010) published indicates that this period was also a time of significant their review of radiocarbon evidence, incorporating change elsewhere (Griffiths 2014a; 2014b), including 4246 dates from 1762 ‘site phases’ across Britain for the first time evidence for people using charac- (Fig. 1). In ‘an effort to move the [indigenous adoption teristic Mesolithic microlith technology at the same versus migration] debate forward’ they employed time as people were constructing Neolithic monu- ‘changes in summed probability distributions of cali- ments and pottery in different parts of the landscape in brated 14C dates derived from different site phases Yorkshire. [to] serve as a proxy for changes in population size’ (Collard et al. 2010, 867). The inferred popula- Critiques of these approaches tion growth rate subsequently identified was viewed as The three key approaches outlined above have been the result of ‘incoming farmers’. As a result, Collard critically scrutinised since their publication. Sheridan’s et al. (2010, 867–9) suggested that south-west (2010) model has been questioned in various ways, England (ie Wessex) was the first area to witness popu- not least for the fairly direct relationship she saw lation increase, inferred to have been brought on by the between the movement of objects/object styles and the arrival of the Neolithic through incoming migration movement of people (Thomas 2013, 159–73). With from c. 4100 cal BC.Since2010,theCollardet al. team specific reference to chronology, Sheridan has been have updated, but not substantially altered the results criticised for using selective ‘visual inspection’ (rather or conclusions of, their earlier work in various papers than detailed chronological modelling) of radiocarbon (eg, Shennan et al. 2013; Timpson et al. 2014). dates and for employing a ‘loose’ chronology relating 2 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. NETSCC, on 13 Oct 2017 at 14:36:42, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2017.4 D. Garrow et al. RADIOCARBON DATING ON ISLANDS WITHIN THE ‘WESTERN SEAWAYS’ OF BRITAIN Fig. 1. The arrival of the Neolithic in Britain and Ireland, as depicted within: (top) Collard et al. 2010, 868, originally in colour; (bottom left) Sheridan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Program of the 76Th Annual Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 76 TH ANNUAL MEETING March 30−April 3, 2011 Sacramento, California THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2011 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 76th Annual Meeting 3 Contents 4................ Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5………..….2011 Award Recipients 11.................Maps of the Hyatt Regency Sacramento, Sheraton Grand Sacramento, and the Sacramento Convention Center 17 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 18 ............... General Information . 20. .............. Featured Sessions 22 ............... Summary Schedule 26 ............... A Word about the Sessions 28…………. Student Events 29………..…Sessions At A Glance (NEW!) 37................ Program 169................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 176................ Presidents of SAA . 176................ Annual Meeting Sites 178................ Exhibit Map 179................Exhibitor Directory 190................SAA Committees and Task Forces 194…….…….Index of Participants 4 Program of the 76th Annual Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting APRIL 1, 2011 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2010 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Department of Archaeology Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey by Donovan William Hawley Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2017 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Archaeology Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lithics, Landscape and People: Life Beyond the Monuments in Prehistoric Guernsey Donovan William Hawley Although prehistoric megalithic monuments dominate the landscape of Guernsey, these have yielded little information concerning the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Early Bronze Age communities who inhabited the island in a broader landscape and maritime context. For this thesis it was therefore considered timely to explore the alternative material culture resource of worked flint and stone archived in the Guernsey museum. Largely ignored in previous archaeological narratives on the island or considered as unreliable data, the argument made in this thesis is for lithics being an ideal resource that, when correctly interrogated, can inform us of past people’s actions in the landscape. In order to maximise the amount of obtainable data, the lithics were subjected to a wide ranging multi-method approach encompassing all stages of the châine opératoire from material acquisition to discard, along with a consideration of the landscape context from which the material was recovered. The methodology also incorporated the extensive corpus of lithic knowledge that has been built up on the adjacent French mainland, a resource largely passed over in previous Channel Island research. By employing this approach, previously unknown patterns of human occupation and activity on the island, and the extent and temporality of maritime connectivity between Guernsey and mainland areas has been revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Stones: Stonehenge, Carnac and the World of Megaliths Free
    FREE STANDING STONES: STONEHENGE, CARNAC AND THE WORLD OF MEGALITHS PDF Jean-Pierre Mohem,Dorie B. Baker | 176 pages | 29 Mar 1999 | Thames & Hudson Ltd | 9780500300909 | English | London, United Kingdom Standing Stones : Stonehenge, Carnac and the World of Megaliths Dorie B. Baker | eBay AIA Tours: land. Tour Dates: May June 5, 12 days. Tour Leader s : Paul G. Bahn. Amidst beautiful landscapes see world renowned, as well as lesser known, Neolithic and Bronze Age megaliths and monuments such as enigmatic rings of giant standing stones and remarkable chambered tombs. Explore medieval churches, charming villages, museum collections, and more. One of the best tours I Carnac and the World of Megaliths ever taken part Carnac and the World of Megaliths. Single room supplement will be charged when requested or required. With fewer than 10 participants, a small group surcharge may be Standing Stones: Stonehenge. This afternoon, take a guided walking tour of Salisbury, including a tour of the Salisbury Museum with its Director. In the evening, enjoy a welcome drink and dinner at our hotel. Overnight at the 4-star Legacy Rose and Crown Hotel for three nights. Its archaeological collections span the Neolithic through medieval periods, and include finds from Stonehenge and Avebury which we visit on May 28 th and May 29 threspectively. After an independent lunch in Devizes we return to Salisbury. The balance of the day is at leisure. After an independent lunch, we drive to Durrington Walls, site of a henge circular structure and the largest Neolithic settlement in northern Europe, where a local expert will join us for Carnac and the World of Megaliths rest of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolmen Leaflet 2014:Dolmen Leaflet 09/09/2014 13:11 Page 1
    dolmen leaflet 2014:dolmen leaflet 09/09/2014 13:11 Page 1 Brief descriptions of the Dolmens of Jersey Les Monts Grantez (4000 BC) - a passage grave with asymmetrical chamber and external side chamber, originally covered by a mound, excavated 1912. Le Pinacle - an important multi-period site comprising a Neolithic axe- production centre (4800 BC), a Chalcolithic open-air ceremonial site (2850 BC) and a Gallo-Roman temple (AD 200), excavated in the 1930s. Dolmen de Géonnais (4000 BC) - a passage grave with an unusual rectangular chamber, almost certainly open, excavated 1929 and 1985-90. Le Couperon (2850 BC) - a gallery grave with rectangular enclosure of WHERE TO FIND THE upright stones and an interesting porthole slab, excavated 1868. La Pouquelaye de Faldouet (4000 BC) - a passage grave with an unusual double chamber, the main chamber is open and surrounded by cists, the Dolmens of Jersey second is covered by a single massive capstone, excavated 1839 and 1868. La Hougue Bie (4000 BC) - one of the finest passage graves in Europe, cruciform in plan and covered by a 12m high mound, excavated 1924, there is an archaeology museum on the site. La Motte - a peninsula until the 17th century, excavations revealed a cairn of unknown date, Neolithic midden material (4000 BC) and a series of 18 cist (box) burials possibly Bronze Age (2000 BC), excavated 1911-14. Mont Ubé (4000 BC) - a passage grave originally with four internal cells, badly destroyed by quarrying, excavated 1848. Ville-és-Nouaux - a remarkable complex with a gallery grave (2850 BC), a cist-in-circle (2250 BC) and evidence of Late Bronze Age urn burials (800 BC), excavated 1869 and 1883.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey's Spiritual Landscape
    Unlock the Island with Jersey Heritage audio tours La Pouquelaye de Faldouët P 04 Built around 6,000 years ago, the dolmen at La Pouquelaye de Faldouët consists of a 5 metre long passage leading into an unusual double chamber. At the entrance you will notice the remains of two dry stone walls and a ring of upright stones that were constructed around the dolmen. Walk along the entrance passage and enter the spacious circular main Jersey’s maritime Jersey’s military chamber. It is unlikely that this was ever landscape landscape roofed because of its size and it is easy Immerse Download the FREE audio tour Immerse Download the FREE audio tour to imagine prehistoric people gathering yourself in from www.jerseyheritage.org yourself in from www.jerseyheritage.org the history the history here to worship and perform rituals. and stories and stories of Jersey of Jersey La Hougue Bie N 04 The 6,000-year-old burial site at Supported by Supported by La Hougue Bie is considered one of Tourism Development Fund Tourism Development Fund the largest and best preserved Neolithic passage graves in Europe. It stands under an impressive mound that is 12 metres high and 54 metres in diameter. The chapel of Notre Dame de la Clarté Jersey’s Maritime Landscape on the summit of the mound was Listen to fishy tales and delve into Jersey’s maritime built in the 12th century, possibly Jersey’s spiritual replacing an older wooden structure. past. Audio tour and map In the 1990s, the original entrance Jersey’s Military Landscape to the passage was exposed during landscape new excavations of the mound.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory and Monuments at the Hill of Tara
    Memory and Monuments at the Hill of Tara Memory and Monuments at the Hill of Tara Erin McDonald This article focuses on the prehistoric monuments located at the ‘royal’ site of Tara in Meath, Ireland, and their significance throughout Irish prehistory. Many of the monuments built during later prehistory respect and avoid earlier constructions, suggesting a cultural memory of the site that lasted from the Neolithic into the Early Medieval period. Understanding the chronology of the various monuments is necessary for deciphering the palimpsest that makes up the landscape of Tara. Based on the reuse, placement and types of monuments at the Hill of Tara, it may be possible to speculate on the motivations and intentions of the prehistoric peoples who lived in the area. Institute for European and Mediterranean Archaeology 55 Erin McDonald This article focuses on the prehistoric and the work of the Discovery Programme, early historic monuments located at the relatively little was known about the ‘royal’ site of the Hill of Tara in County archaeology of Tara. Seán Ó Ríordáin Meath, Ireland, and the significance of the carried out excavations of Duma na nGiall monuments throughout and after the main and Ráith na Senad, but died before he period of prehistoric activity at Tara. The could publish his findings.6 In recent years, Hill of Tara is one of the four ‘royal’ sites Ó Ríordáin’s notes have been compiled from the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age into site reports and excavated material was in Ireland, and appears to have played an utilized for radiocarbon dating.7 important role in ritual and ceremonial activity, more so than the other ‘royal’ sites; medieval literature suggests that Tara had a crucial role in the inauguration of Irish kings.1 Many of the monuments built on the Hill of Tara during the later prehistoric period respect or incorporate earlier monuments, suggesting a cultural memory of the importance of the Hill of Tara that lasted from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval Period.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeoecological, Archaeological and Historical Data and the Making of Devon Landscapes
    bs_bs_banner Palaeoecological, archaeological and historical data and the making of Devon landscapes. I. The Blackdown Hills ANTONY G. BROWN, CHARLOTTE HAWKINS, LUCY RYDER, SEAN HAWKEN, FRANCES GRIFFITH AND JACKIE HATTON Brown, A. G., Hawkins, C., Ryder, L., Hawken, S., Griffith, F. & Hatton, J.: Palaeoecological, archaeological and historical data and the making of Devon landscapes. I. The Blackdown Hills. Boreas. 10.1111/bor.12074. ISSN 0300-9483. This paper presents the first systematic study of the vegetation history of a range of low hills in SW England, UK, lying between more researched fenlands and uplands. After the palaeoecological sites were located bespoke archaeological, historical and documentary studies of the surrounding landscape were undertaken specifically to inform palynological interpretation at each site. The region has a distinctive archaeology with late Mesolithic tool scatters, some evidence of early Neolithic agriculture, many Bronze Age funerary monuments and Romano- British iron-working. Historical studies have suggested that the present landscape pattern is largely early Medi- eval. However, the pollen evidence suggests a significantly different Holocene vegetation history in comparison with other areas in lowland England, with evidence of incomplete forest clearance in later-Prehistory (Bronze−Iron Age). Woodland persistence on steep, but poorly drained, slopes, was probably due to the unsuit- ability of these areas for mixed farming. Instead they may have been under woodland management (e.g. coppicing) associated with the iron-working industry. Data from two of the sites also suggest that later Iron Age and Romano-British impact may have been geographically restricted. The documented Medieval land manage- ment that maintained the patchwork of small fields, woods and heathlands had its origins in later Prehistory, but there is also evidence of landscape change in the 6th–9th centuries AD.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Report
    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 29-2011 ISSN 1749-8775 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES REPORT Dale Serjeantson ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Department Report Series 29-2011 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) Dale Serjeantson © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series, incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey; and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series, and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department Reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected]. or by writing to English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Council for Culture Conference
    Jersey Conference for Culture 2012 Julie Gibson, County Archaeologist, Orkney “The Heart of Neolithic Orkney World Heritage Site: its meaning and value for tourism” Having looked at La Hougue Bie and the bronze coin hoard as examples of Jersey’s rich heritage, there was no question that a World Heritage site in thet Island was possible – the question was rather ‘did Jersey want it’? What was the balance between the bureaucracy which it brought and the opportunity to brag about the designation? Experience in Orkney was mixed. Orkney comprises an archipelago of 18 islands with farming at the heart of the economy, though recently there had also been a rapid expansion of interest in renewable energy. Historic Scotland run the World Heritage sites (with 1 ½ ranger posts) but simply regarding archaeology as a series of museum exhibits was not sufficient; making the most of it also involved ‘doing it’. There was no was no national support for ongoing excavation. However, partnerships had been developed with universities, and archaeology was a niche subject at the University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI). A commercial unit which undertook work for developers subsidised the archaeology. The period of human occupation in Orkney was much more recent than Jersey’s, dating from the Mesolithic. Principal visitor sites were the Neolithic monumental sites which included buildings, burial tombs and villages with stone furniture. Sand blown sites like Skara Brae had been rediscovered after extreme weather conditions. Finds from later periods revealed the increasing wealth of the Bronze Age, discoveries from the Iron Age and later evidence of Roman trade in amphora, broaches and drinking glasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Aspects of the Windmill Hill Culture 1 Are to Be Discussed in This Paper
    r. F. SMITH WINDMILL HILL AND ITS IMPLICATIONS (Figs. 1-2) Two aspects of the Windmill Hill culture 1 are to be discussed in this paper. One will be the specificproblem of the function of the causewayed enclosures or 'camps' which constitute one of its characteristic earthwork structures. The other will be its role as the founder of traditions that were to survive long after its own disappea­ rance. THE FUNCTION OF THE CAUSE WAYED ENCLOSURES Fifteen or sixteen earthworks of this type are now known in southerri England2, and over a dozen more may be indicated by cropmarks discovered during recent aerial surveys of valley gravels in counties north of the Thames (St. Joseph, 1966; see also Feachem, 1966). These, however, remain to be verified by excavation. The main concentration of proven sites therefore still lies in the counties of DOl'set, Wiltshire and Sussex, where there are altogether eleven, all on chalk downland; two more are in the Thames valley, in Berkshire and Middlesex, and the remainder are outliers in Bedfordshire and Devonshire. The enclosures3 are oval or roughly circular in plan and vary in diameter from about 400 m(Windmill Hill, Maiden Castle) to less than 200 m(Combe Hill, Staines). Five have diameters within the range 230-290. The ditch systems consist of one to four rings, or incomplete rings, of segments of variable length separated by cause­ ways of variable width. The three rings at Windmill Hill must all be regarded as integral parts of the original plan, for they ean be shown to have been contemporary (Smith, 1965, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Face of Neolithic and Bronze Age Ireland: a Big Data Approach to the Settlement and Burial Records
    The Changing Face of Neolithic and Bronze Age Ireland: A Big Data Approach to the Settlement and Burial Records McLaughlin, T., Whitehouse, N., Schulting, R. J., McClatchie, M., & Barratt, P. (2016). The Changing Face of Neolithic and Bronze Age Ireland: A Big Data Approach to the Settlement and Burial Records. Journal of World Prehistory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-016-9093-0 Published in: Journal of World Prehistory Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Two Middle Neolithic Radiocarbon Dates from the East Midlands
    THE NEWSLASTetteR OF THE PREHISTORIC SOCIetY P Registered Office: University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY http://www.prehistoricsociety.org/ Two Middle Neolithic radiocarbon dates from the East Midlands Earlier this year, radiocarbon dates were commissioned for awaiting confirmation of post-excavation funding. The two Middle Neolithic artefacts from the east Midlands. The bowl was originally identified as a Food Vessel. It has a fine first was obtained from a macehead of red deer antler from thin fabric, a concave neck, rounded body and foot-ring. Watnall, Northamptonshire, currently in the collections It is decorated all over with incised herring bone motif and of the National Museums Scotland who acquired it in certainly has a Food Vessel form. However the rim form is 1946/7. The macehead is No. 2 in Simpson’s corpus (PPS much more in keeping with Impressed Ware ceramics and 1996). It is of standard ‘crown’ type, it is undecorated, and the foot-ring has been added to an otherwise rounded base. unfortunately the circumstances of the find are unknown. Both the foot-ring and the decorated lower part of the vessel A radiocarbon date was obtained from the antler itself and are features more common in Food Vessels than in Impressed produced a result of 4395±30 BP (SUERC-40112). This date Wares. Could this be a missing link? Does this vessel bridge unfortunately coincides with a plateau in the calibration curve the Impressed Ware-Food Vessel gap? A later Neolithic or but nevertheless calibrates to 3097–2916 cal BC (95.4% Chalcolithic date was expected but instead the date is very probability) and is in keeping with the few available dates firmly in the Middle Neolithic – 4790±35 BP (SUERC- already obtained for these artefacts (see Loveday et al.
    [Show full text]