DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of the Belgian Stoneflies (Piecoptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of the Belgian Stoneflies (Piecoptera) especially if it is near the middle of the second H_ •. lwti.:.Ie. In: So6s A & PAPP L.(Eds.) Catalogue basal cell is not a conclusive character to separate o{ Pa!:!earctic Diptera Vol. 6 Therevidae - the two groups. /,mpid:.tae: 174-227. EN•_;EL f, 1939. - Empididae, Tachydromiinae. In: Acknowledgements LIND~:sR, E.; Die Fliegen der Palaearktische Regi,.·t, 4, 4: 1-119. Stuttgart. We thank Mr. Pol LIMBOURG {RBINS) who KDVAL:.v V.G., 1972. - Diptera of the genera collected the frrst Belgian Drapetis flavipes. Dr. Dra,. •etis Mg. and Crossopalpus Bigot (Diptera, Christophe DAUGERON searched the Macquart Empididae) from the European part of the USSR. Collection at the Museum national d 'Histo ire Entomologischeskoe Obozrenie, ·51, 173-196 [in Naturelle in Paris for the type material. Russian]. MACQUART J., 1827.- Insectes Dipteres du Nord de References la France. Platypezines, Dolichopodes, Empides, Hybotides. 357 pp Lille COLLIN J.E.,l961. -British Flies 6. Empididae, 782 MACQUART J., 1834. - Histoire nature/le des pp. Cambridge Insectes. Dipteres. I. 578 pp. Paris CHVALA M., 1975. - The Tachydromiinae (Dipt. ROSER C. VON, 1840. - Erster Nachtrag zu dem in Empididae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Jahre 1834 bekannt gemachten Verzeichnisse in entomologica scandinavica 3: 336 pp. Wiirttemberg vorkommender zweiflugliger CHV ALA M., 2004. - Fauna Europaea: Diptera, Insekten. Correspondenzblatt des Koniglich Hybotidae. Fauna Europaea version 1.1, Wiirttembergischen Landwirtschaftlichen Vereins. http://www .faunaeur.org. Stuttgart. (N.F.) 17(1): 49-64. CHV ALA M. & KOVALEV V.G., 1989. - Family Bulletin S.R.B.E.IK.B. V.E., 146 (2010): 115-122 Checklist of the Belgian stoneflies (Piecoptera) 1 3 1 Koen LOCK , Jean-Pierre V AND EN BOSSCHi· & Peter L.M. GOETHALS 1 Ghent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, J. Plateaustraat 22, B- 9000 Gent 2 Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Laboratoire de Zoologie et d'Ecologie anirnales, 50 Avenue F. Roosevelt, B- 1050 Bruxelles 3 Departement de !'Etude du Milieu naturel et agricole, DGARNE, Service Public de Wallonie, 23 avenue Marechal Juin, B-5300 Gembloux Abstract In the present study, 52 species of stoneflies are listed for Belgium. However, 14 of these have not been reported for several decades: some have probably been overlooked and will hopefully be rediscovered in the future, while others are probably extinct in Belgium. The latter species are especially potamal species that were restricted to the river Meuse and the downstream part of the river Ourthe. A few other species have been reported from the surrounding countries and may also be encountered in Belgium. An overview of the literature dealing with the Belgian stoneflies is given. In addition, three species are reported here for the frrst time for Belgium: Amphinemura borea/is (Morton, 1894), Nemouraflexuosa AUBERT, 1949 andLeuctra majorBRINCK, 1949. Keywords: aquatic insects; Amphinemura borealis; Belgium; Leuctra major; macroinvertebrates; Nemoura jlexuosa. 115 Samenvatt! ~!g In deze studie worden 52 soorten steenvliegen ge!neld ·:oor Belgie. Hiervan werden 14 soorten echter niet meer teruggevonden de laatste decennia. Enke!~ daarvan werden waarschijnlijk over het hoofd gezien en zullen hopelijk herontdekt worden j,, de :.)ekomst, enkele andere zijn waarschijnlijk uitgestorven in Belgie. Tot deze laatste groep beho;~n v.--.omamelijk soorten die gebonden zijn aan grote rivieren en die enkel voorkwamen in de Maas en b:t benedenstrooms gedeelte van de Ourthe. Daarnaast werden nog enkele andere soorten die worden waargenomen in de omliggende landen en die mogelijk ook in Belgie kunnen gevonden worden. Een overzicht van de bestaande literatuur over de steenvliegen in Belgie wordt gepresenteerd. Bovendien worden drie soorten voor het eerst gemeld voor de Belgische fauna: Amphinemura borealis (MORTON, 1894), Nemoura jlexuosa AUBERT, 1949 en Leuctra major BRINCK, 1949. Resume Dans cette etude, 52 especes de plecopteres sont rapportees pour la Belgique. Parmi celles-ci, 14 especes n' ont plus ete rapportees depuis plusieurs decennies. Certaines sont probablement passees inaper9ues et pourront etre redecouvertes dans le futur, mais d'autres auraient disparu, en particulier celles que l'on trouvait anciennement dans la Meuse ou dans le cours inferieur de l'Ourthe. Quelques especes ont ete rapportees des pays voisins et peuvent aussi etre presentes en Belgique. Trois especes sont rapportees ici pour la premiere fois de Belgique: Amphinemura borea/is {MORTON, 1894}, Nemourajlexuosa AUBERT, 1949 et Leuctra major BRINCK, 1949. Un aper9u de la litterature est donne. Introduction an overview is given about the literature dealing with Plecoptera in Belgium. Based on these data, The first checklist of the Belgian Plecoptera a checklist of the Belgian species is presented was made by DE SELYS-LONGCHAMPS (1888), and three additional species are reported here for who listed 21 species for Belgium, however, the first time for Belgium: Amphinemura these were not all identified correctly as will be borealis {MORTON, 1894), Nemoura jlexuosa discussed below. Later, LAMEERE (1900) only AUBERT, 1949 andLeuctra majorBRINCK, 1949. listed 13 species in his 'Manuel de la faune de Belgique', apparently he neglected the previous Materials and methods study. NAVAS (1911) copied the list ofDE SELYS­ LONGCHAMPS (1888) and added one species: During the present study, all the available Brachyptera putata (Newman, 1838). However, material, adults as well as larvae, from the Royal the latter species is restricted to the UK and the Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Ukraine (FAUNA EUROPAEA, 2004) and no the University Faculty of Agronomic Sciences in material was preserved, this record was therefore Gembloux (FSAG), the Flemish Environmental omitted. AUBERT (1956), who studied the Agency (VMM), Ghent University (UGent), the collection of the Royal Belgian Institute of University of Antwerp (UA), the University of Natural Sciences, listed 50 species for Belgium Mons (UMons), the University of Liege (ULG) of which four were omitted here as will be and part of the material of the Departement de discussed below. Since then, only three species 1' Etude du Milieu nature} et agricole, Service have been added to the Belgian fauna: Diura Public de Wallonie (DGARNE; V ANDEN bicaudata (Linnaeus, 1758) was reported by BOSSCHE, 2007) was identified. AUBERT (1957), Capnioneura mitis Despax, The Belgian stonefly species can be identified 1932 was observed by HOFFMANN (1965) and with the key ofiLLIES (1955), which only misses Leuctra pseudosignifera AUBERT, 1954 was Capnioneura mitis DESPAX, 1932, but is not very recently found by LOCK & GOETHALS (2008). good for .larvae. AUBERT (1959) is incomplete, During the present study, most available but a useful addition, especially for Leuctridae material from collections of Belgian Plecoptera and larvae, while KIS ( 1974) is in Rumanian but was identified. In addition, field work was contains good drawings of adults. DESP AX carried out in order to get an idea of which (1951) is only for adults, it is incomplete and the species are still present in Belgium. Furthermore, key is not that good, but it contains C. mitis. The 116 keys for the British Isles {HYNES, 1977) and the nve;- Meuse and the river Ourthe in the Netherlands {KOESE, 2008) contain only a ninc:eenth century (AUBERT, 1956). Per/odes fraction of the Belgium fauna and should mic·-ocephalus (PICTET, 1833) is quite common therefore not be used for Belgium, however, they so•.:h of the rivers Sambre and Meuse (DE give useful additional information. With the key Sr::.vs-LONGCHAMPS, 1888; LAMEERE, 1900; of ZWICK (2004), all larvae of West Palearctic N.". VAS, 1911; AUBERT, 1956). species can be identified, but only to genus level. Perlidae Results Dinocras cephalotes (CURTIS, 1827), Per/a burmeisteriana CLAASSEN, 1936 and Per/a In total, 52 species of stoneflies (Plecoptera) marginata (PANZER, 1799) have been reported have been found in Belgium (Table 1). For each frequently south of the rivers Sambre and Meuse family, the occurring species are discussed and (DE SELYS-LONGCHAMPS, 1888; LAMEERE, 1900; an overview is given of the Belgian literature. NAvas, 1911; LESTAGE, 1920c; KLAPALEK, 1923; COOREMAN, 1946, 1949; AUBERT, 1956) Perlodidae and are still quite common. Perla bipunctata One specimen of Besdolus imhoffi (PICTET, PICTET, 1833 and Per/a grandis RAMBUR, 1842 1841) was collected by DE SEL YS-LONGCHAMPS, were also reported (DE SEL YS-LONGCHAMPS, and was reported by KLAPALEK ( 1912, 1923) and 1888; LAMEERE, 1900; NAVAS, 1911; LESTAGE, AUBERT (1956) from Halloy. However, LESTAGE 1920c; KLAPALEK, 1923, LESTAGE, 1935; (unpublished data) indicated that this specimen AUBERT, 1956), however, verification of the did not contain a label when he studied it and it material present at the RBINS indicated that this should also be noted that DE SEL vs­ were all misidentified larvae. Marthamea selysii LONGCHAMPS (1888) did not mention this (PICTET, 1841) lived in the river Meuse and the species in his catalogue. For these reasons, B. river Semois {MAC LACHLAN, 1877, 1881 a; DE imhoffi was not included in the presented SELYS-LONGCHAMPS, 1888; LAMEERE, 1900; checklist. Diura bicaudata (LINNAEUS, 1758) NAVAS, 1911; KLAPALEK, 1923; AUBERT, 1956), was only reported from Duzo-Moupas {AUBERT, but has not been observed for almost a century. 1957), but more recently, it was also found at several other locations in the Ardennes region. Chloroperlidae Isogenus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of the Netherlands
    Me thods and results of EIS mappi ng schemes i n the Net herlands, J. van To l & P. J . van Helsdi ngen (Eds) Ni euwsbrief Eur opean Invertebrate Survey - Nederlan d , 10 (1981) : 73-77 . THE STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF THE NETHERLANDS E .E.C.M. Claess e n s Rijksmuseum van Natuurli jke Historie, Leiden * Introduction springs, brooks and r i vers, but some live on the shores of lakes. The order occurs world- wide , but Recently I have ma de a survey of the Dutch spe­ is exclud ed from the tropics. The species diver­ cies of stoneflies (Pl ecoptera). This study was sity is greatest in the temperate regi ons . started because we had the impression that the The most important factors influencing distri­ number of species of this insect order had de­ bution are stream velocity, altitude , substratum, clined severel y in the course of this century, chemi cal composition of the water, temporal while some of the remai n i ng species had become drying out of the habitat and the abil ity to much restricted in t heir dist ributi ons. Theim­ colonize (e. g . Hynes 1941). The water movement portant changes i n abundance and distribution influences the oxygen content and substratum; we re e xpected to be related with the severe de­ altitude the temperature of the water. terioration of the environment, especially during the more r e cent decades. The aim of the present The imagines of most species emerge earl y in study was to describe the pre s e nt situation for spring, but some emerge only in autumn.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Ecology of the Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Flanders
    Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2008, 44 (3), 203 - 213 Distribution and ecology of the stonefl ies (Plecoptera) of Flanders (Belgium) K. Lock, P.L.M. Goethals Ghent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, J. Plateaustraat 22, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Based on a literature survey and the identifi cation of all available collection material from Flanders, a checklist is presented, distribution maps are plotted and the relationship between the occurrence of the different species and water characteristics is analysed. Of the sixteen stonefl y species that have been recorded, three are now extinct in Flanders (Isogenus nubecula, Taen- iopteryx nebulosa and T. schoenemundi), while the remaining species are rare. The occurrence of stonefl ies is almost restricted to small brooks, while observations in larger watercourses are almost lacking. Although a few records may indicate that some larger watercourses have recently been recolonised, these observations consisted of single specimens and might be due to drift. Most stonefl y population are strongly isolated and therefore extremely vulnerable. Small brooks in the Campine region (northeast Flanders), which are characterised by a lower pH and a lower conductivity, contained a different stonefl y community than the small brooks in the rest of Flanders. Leuctra pseudosignifera, Nemoura marginata and Protonemura intricata are mainly found in small brooks in the loamy region, Amphinemura standfussi, Isoperla grammatica, Leuctra fusca, L. hippopus, N. avicularis and P. meyeri mainly occur in small Campine brooks, while L. nigra, N. cinerea and Nemurella pictetii can be found in both types. Nemoura dubitans can typically be found in stagnant water fed with freatic water.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Production of Mayflies, Stoneflies, and Caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in a Spring-Fe
    Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 1083 Life history and production of mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) in a spring-fed stream in Prince Edward Island, Canada: evidence for population asynchrony in spring habitats? Michelle Dobrin and Donna J. Giberson Abstract: We examined the life history and production of the Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) commu- nity along a 500-m stretch of a hydrologically stable cold springbrook in Prince Edward Island during 1997 and 1998. Six mayfly species (Ephemeroptera), 6 stonefly species (Plecoptera), and 11 caddisfly species (Trichoptera) were collected from benthic and emergence samples from five sites in Balsam Hollow Brook. Eleven species were abundant enough for life-history and production analysis: Baetis tricaudatus, Cinygmula subaequalis, Epeorus (Iron) fragilis,andEpeorus (Iron) pleuralis (Ephemeroptera), Paracapnia angulata, Sweltsa naica, Leuctra ferruginea, Amphinemura nigritta,and Nemoura trispinosa (Plecoptera), and Parapsyche apicalis and Rhyacophila brunnea (Trichoptera). Life-cycle timing of EPT taxa in Balsam Hollow Brook was generally similar to other literature reports, but several species showed extended emergence periods when compared with other studies, suggesting a reduction in synchronization of life-cycle timing, pos- sibly as a result of the thermal patterns in the stream. Total EPT secondary production (June 1997 to May 1998) was 2.74–2.80 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass (size-frequency method). Mayflies were dominant, with a production rate of 2.2 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass, followed by caddisflies at 0.41 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass, and stoneflies at 0.19 g·m–2·year–1 dry mass.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae), a New Stonefly from California, U.S.A
    Stark, Bill P. & Richard W. Baumann, 2007. Sweltsa yurok (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae), a new stonefly from California, U.S.A. Illiesia, 3(10):95-101. Available online: http://www2.pms-lj.si/illiesia/Illiesia03-10.pdf SWELTSA YUROK (PLECOPTERA: CHLOROPERLIDAE), A NEW STONEFLY FROM CALIFORNIA, U.S.A. Bill P. Stark1and Richard W. Baumann 2 1 Box 4045, Department of Biology, Mississippi College, Clinton, Mississippi, U.S.A. 39058 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Integrative Biology, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Sweltsa yurok, sp. n. is described from specimens collected in the Coast Range of northern California. The new species is compared to S. pisteri Baumann & Bottorff, and S. tamalpa (Ricker), closely related species found in the same region, and a provisional key to males of the Sweltsa tamalpa species group is presented. Keywords: Plecoptera, Chloroperlidae, Sweltsa, new species, California INTRODUCTION Following the studies of Surdick (1995) and The Sweltsa tamalpa group Baumann & Bottorff (1997) the systematics of western Nearctic Sweltsa has remained unchanged with 21 Members of this group have a relatively short, species recognized. In 1998, 2001 and again in 2005 slender, hairy epiproct with bare tip and a median, we, and various colleagues, collected specimens of a bare knob on male tergum 9; the epiproct apex is small distinctive Sweltsa in tributaries of Willow expanded near midlength, usually giving the Creek in the greater Trinity-Klamath River drainage structure a foot shaped appearance in lateral aspect. of northern California, an area where several other Female subgenital plates are more or less triangular, interesting stoneflies have been discovered have a basal transverse groove, and are relatively (Baumann & Lauck 1987; Stark & Baumann 2001; strongly sclerotized.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Evolutionary Trends in Plecoptera
    Some Evolutionary Trends in Plecoptera W. E. Ricker, Indiana University Structural Evolution The families and subfam ilies of stoneflies recognized by the writer are as follows: Distribution A. Suborder Holognatha (Setipalpia) Eustheniidae Eustheniinae Australia and New Zealand Diamphipnoinae Southern South America Austroperlidae Australia and New Zealand Leptoperlidae Leptoperlinae Australia and New Zealand; Fiji Islands; temperate South America Scopurinae Japan Peltoperlidae North and South America; east Asia and the bordering islands, south to Borneo Nemouridae Notonemourinae Australia and New Zealand Nemourinae Holarctic region Leuctrinae Holarctic region; South Africa; Tierra del Fuego Capniinae Holarctic Taeniopteryginae Holarctic Pteronarcidae North America; eastern Siberia B. Suborder Systellognatha (Filipalpia) Perlodidae Isogeninae Holarctic Perlodinae Holarctic Isoperlinae Holarctic Chloroperlidae Paraperlinae Nearctic Chloroperlinae Holarctic Perlidae Perlinae Old-world tropics, and the temperature regions of Africa, Eurasia and eastern North America Acroneuriinae North and South America; eastern and southeastern Asia 1 Contribution number 421 from the Department of Zoology, [ndiana University. 197 198 Indiana Academy of Science Tillyard places the ancestors of present day stoneflies in the family Lemmatophoridae of the Permian order Protoperlaria. These insects had small wing-like lateral expansions of the prothorax, and a fairly well- developed posterior (concave) median vein in both wings, both of which have been lost in modern stoneflies. Developments in some of the mor- phological features which have been most studied are as follows: Nymphal mouth parts: The holognathous families are characterized by bulky mandibles, by short thick palpi, and by having the paraglossae and glossae of the labium about equal in length. In the adult the man- dibles remain large and functional.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollettino Della Società Entomologica Italiana
    BOLL.ENTOMOL_152_3_cover.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/20 10:43 Pagina a Poste Italiane S.p.A. ISSN 0373-3491 Spedizione in % Abbonamento Postale - 70 DCB Genova BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Volume 152 Fascicolo III settembre - dicembre 2020 31 dicembre 2020 SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA via Brigata Liguria 9 Genova BOLL.ENTOMOL_152_3_cover.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/20 10:43 Pagina b SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Sede di Genova, via Brigata Liguria, 9 presso il Museo Civico di Storia Naturale n Consiglio Direttivo 2018-2020 Presidente: Francesco Pennacchio Vice Presidente: Roberto Poggi Segretario: Davide Badano Amministratore/Tesoriere: Giulio Gardini Bibliotecario: Antonio Rey Direttore delle Pubblicazioni: Pier Mauro Giachino Consiglieri: Alberto Alma, Alberto Ballerio, Andrea Battisti, Marco A. Bologna, Achille Casale, Marco Dellacasa, Loris Galli, Gianfranco Liberti, Bruno Massa, Massimo Meregalli, Luciana Tavella, Stefano Zoia Revisori dei Conti: Enrico Gallo, Giuliano Lo Pinto Revisori dei Conti supplenti: Giovanni Tognon, Marco Terrile n Consulenti Editoriali PAOLO AUDISIO (Roma) - EMILIO BALLETTO (Torino) - MAURIZIO BIONDI (L’Aquila) - MARCO A. BOLOGNA (Roma) PIETRO BRANDMAYR (Cosenza) - ROMANO DALLAI (Siena) - MARCO DELLACASA (Calci, Pisa) - ERNST HEISS (Innsbruck) - MANFRED JÄCH (Wien) - FRANCO MASON (Verona) - LUIGI MASUTTI (Padova) - ALESSANDRO MINELLI (Padova) - JOSÉ M. SALGADO COSTAS (Leon) - VALERIO SBORDONI (Roma) - BARBARA KNOFLACH-THALER (Innsbruck) STEFANO TURILLAZZI (Firenze) - ALBERTO ZILLI (Londra) - PETER ZWICK (Schlitz). ISSN 0373-3491 BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Fondata nel 1869 - Eretta a Ente Morale con R. Decreto 28 Maggio 1936 Volume 152 Fascicolo III settembre - dicembre 2020 31 dicembre 2020 REGISTRATO PRESSO IL TRIBUNALE DI GENOVA AL N. 76 (4 LUGLIO 1949) Prof. Achille Casale - Direttore Responsabile Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale 70% - Quadrimestrale Pubblicazione a cura di PAGEPress - Via A.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Brachyptera Putata (Newman) (Plecoptera, Taeniopterygidae) – a Stonefly Endemic to Scotland
    Scottish Natural Heritage Research Report No. 1094 Survey of Brachyptera putata (Newman) (Plecoptera, Taeniopterygidae) – a stonefly endemic to Scotland RESEARCH REPORT Research Report No. 1094 Survey of Brachyptera putata (Newman) (Plecoptera, Taeniopterygidae) – a stonefly endemic to Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Iain Sime Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House Leachkin Road INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725232 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Macadam, C.R. 2019. Survey of Brachyptera putata (Newman) (Plecoptera, Taeniopterygidae) – a stonefly endemic to Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Research Report No. 1094. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2019. RESEARCH REPORT Summary Survey of Brachyptera putata (Newman) (Plecoptera, Taeniopterygidae) – a stonefly endemic to Scotland Research Report No. 1094 Project No: 016928 Contractor: Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust Year of publication: 2019 Keywords Northern February red stonefly; Brachyptera putata; stonefly; Cairngorms; Plecoptera; rivers Background The Northern February red stonefly (Brachyptera putata) is globally restricted to watercourses in the Scottish Highlands. Outside of Scotland, this species has only ever been found in two areas – the River Usk in Wales and the Wye near Hereford, where it is now thought to be extinct. As an endemic species, the UK population is of international significance. Surveys in the last 15 years have confirmed that the Northern February red is present in the Dee from Linn of Dee downstream, a number of Dee tributaries and along the River Spey.
    [Show full text]
  • BAP Riverfly Interim Report 2009-10
    BAP Riverfly Interim Report 2009-10 Vicky Kindemba & Bridget Peacock Acknowledgement to Natural England Countdown 2010, the Riverfly Partnership Species and Habitat Group, partner organisations and a wide number of individuals and volunteers. Surveys coordinated by The Riverfly Partnership and Buglife - The Invertebrate Conservation Trust. The Riverfly Partnership operates within The Salmon & Trout Association. VK / BP v2 9/6/2010 Contents 1. Northern February red Brachyptera putata ..............................................................3 1.1. River Dee - March 2010 onwards - David Pryce ..............................................3 1.2. River Dee - Feb / March 2009 - David Pryce/Craig Macadam..........................3 2. Small grey sedge Glossosoma intermedium ............................................................4 2.1. Cumbria - March 2009 – Ian Wallace / Andrew Dixon ......................................4 2.2. Cumbria - March 2010 - Andrew Dixon ............................................................4 2.3. Cumbria - August 2009 - Andrew Dixon / Ian Wallace.....................................4 3. Window winged sedge Hagenella clathrata ............................................................6 3.1. June 2009 - Surrey - Ian Wallace / Graham Vicks / Daniel Atter ......................6 4. Scarce brown sedge Ironoquia dubia ......................................................................7 4.1. Summer 2009 – Winter 2010 Hampshire & Berkshire Graham Vicks.............7 5. Yellow Mayfly Potamanthus luteus ..........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Sovraccoperta Fauna Inglese Giusta, Page 1 @ Normalize
    Comitato Scientifico per la Fauna d’Italia CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA FAUNA THE ITALIAN AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHECKLIST 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species and inland water 10,000 terrestrial CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species ISBNISBN 88-89230-09-688-89230- 09- 6 Ministero dell’Ambiente 9 778888988889 230091230091 e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare CH © Copyright 2006 - Comune di Verona ISSN 0392-0097 ISBN 88-89230-09-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers and of the Authors. Direttore Responsabile Alessandra Aspes CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona - 2. Serie Sezione Scienze della Vita 17 - 2006 PROMOTING AGENCIES Italian Ministry for Environment and Territory and Sea, Nature Protection Directorate Civic Museum of Natural History of Verona Scientifi c Committee for the Fauna of Italy Calabria University, Department of Ecology EDITORIAL BOARD Aldo Cosentino Alessandro La Posta Augusto Vigna Taglianti Alessandra Aspes Leonardo Latella SCIENTIFIC BOARD Marco Bologna Pietro Brandmayr Eugenio Dupré Alessandro La Posta Leonardo Latella Alessandro Minelli Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch Augusto Vigna Taglianti Marzio Zapparoli EDITORS Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch DESIGN Riccardo Ricci LAYOUT Riccardo Ricci Zeno Guarienti EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Elisa Giacometti TRANSLATORS Maria Cristina Bruno (1-72, 239-307) Daniel Whitmore (73-238) VOLUME CITATION: Ruffo S., Stoch F.
    [Show full text]
  • PERLA No. 7, 1984-1985
    p E R L A No. 7 1984-1985 Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 PERLA A Newsletter for Plecopterologists EDITORS: Richard W. Baumann, Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602. Peter Zwick, Limnologische Flußstation, Max-Planck-Institut für Limnologie, Postfach 260, D-6407, Schlitz, West Germany. EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Bonnie Snow The Ninth International Symposium on Plecoptera The Ninth International Symposium on Plecoptera is to be held at Marysville, near Melbourne Victoria, Australia in February 1987. The conference will be held in conjunction with the Fifth International Conference on Ephemeroptera. Dates have been scheduled to follow the 23rd Congress of the Societas Internationalis Limnologiae at Hamilton, New Zealand, February 8-14. The format of the conference will provide for separate meetings for the plecopterists and ephemeropterists together with joint sessions and social activities. The provisional program is: February 18-20 Ephemeroptera Conference, Feb. 21 Symposium: Life History Strategies in the Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera, Feb. 22 Field Day, and Feb. 23-24 as the IXth International Plecoptera Conference. Papers on any aspect of Plecoptera will be welcome, particularly those on Southern Hemisphere species. An extended field tour of Southeastern Australian streams will be available from February 23-28. For additional information, please contact: Dr. Ian Campbell Water Studies Centre Chisholm Institute of Technology East Caulfield 3145 Australia 1 POST MORTEM: FIRST N. AMERICAN PLECOPTERA SYMPOSIUM Our first symposium can be declared a success. Although only scheduled for 18-20 June, early arrivals and late departures extended it to a stimulating and fun-packed week.
    [Show full text]