DOCSLIB.ORG

1120440001.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1120440001.Pdf !·" n ? -; It , •. r,...",', o t .. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 93-89 Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 25.131 CC Docket No. 93-23 of the Commission's Rules RM-7931 and Regulations to Eliminate the Licensing Requirement for Certain International Receive-Only Earth Stations NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: February 11, 1993 Released: March 8, 1993 Comment Date: May 12, 1993 Reply Comment Date: May 27, 1993 By the Commission: I. INTRODUCTION 1. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes to eliminate the licensing requirement for most international receive-only earth stations in the fixed­ satellite service. Our decision to initiate this proceeding is in response to the Communications Satellite Corporation's (Comsat's) petition to repeal the licensing requirement for receive-only earth stations operating with satellites of the International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation (INTELSAT).1 Comsat I s proposal is consistent with the Commission's ongoing effort to eliminate unnecessary regulation and speed processing. We therefore treat Comsat 1 s pleading as a petition for rulemaking, and incorporate it into this broader proceeding to deregulate most international receive-only earth stations in the fixed-satellite service. 1 Communications Satellite Corporation, Petition for Repeal and, in the Interim, for Waiver of Section 25. 131(j) (1), filed February 20, 1992. Comsat's petition was the subject of two public notices, one (RM-7931) dealing with Comsat's request for repeal of the rule, and the other (File No. ISP-92-004) dealing with its request for a waiver. The Bureau dismissed without prejudice Comsat's waiver request for failure to demonstrate special circumstances that would make strict application of the rule inconsistent with the purposes of the rule. Communications Satellite Corporation, 7 FCC Rcd 4602 (Com. Car. Bur. 1992) . Comsat refiled its waiver request (File No. ISP-92-007), narrowing its scope to cover only international receive-only earth stations accessing the INTELSAT K satellite, and providing services similar to INTELNET I. See infra note 4. The Bureau granted Comsat' s revised wavier request. Communications Satellite Corporation, 7 FCC Rcd 6028 (Com. Car. Bur. 1992), app. for review pending. II. BACKGROUND A. Existing policy 2. Pursuant to Section 25.131 (j) of the Commission's Rules, the Commission licenses international receive-only earth stations operating with INTELSAT satellites, international separate system satellites, or U.S. domestic and non­ 2 U.S. satellites for reception of fixed-satellite services from other countries. The only receive-only earth stations excepted from this requirement are those used to receive INTELNET I services3 from INTELSAT satellites. 4 3. Section 25.131(j) was adopted in 1991 as part of a broader rulemaking in which the Part 25 rules were revised, and the licensing requirement for domestic receive-only earth stations was eliminated in favor of a voluntary registration program. 5 In the Part 25 Order proceeding, the Commission was clhked by one of nearly eighty commenting parties to deregulate all international receive-only earth stations as well. The Commission declined this invitation because the comments on the record before it were" insufficient to decide whether and under what conditions current licensing requirements may be relaxed consistent with international obligations. ,,6 However, the Commission indicated 7 that further review of this issue may be desirable in a separate proceeding. We now believe that the time has come to eliminate certain licensing requirements. Therefore, we are initiating this rulemaking and inviting public comments. B. Comsat's Petition 2 47 C.F.R. § 25.131(j) (1991). 3 INTELNET I service involves the one-way transmission of data to a sma.ll, stand-alone, receive-only earth station on a customer's premise. 4 See Derequlation of Receive-Only Earth Stations Operating wit]! t-he INTELSAT Global Communications Satellite System, Declaratory Ruling, RM No. 4845, FCC 86-214 (released May 19, 1986) (Equatorial). In addition, the Bureau rec'mtly granted a waiver to permit unlicensed operation of international receive-only earth stations accessing the INTELSAT K satellite, to the extent such recel' ion: (1) involves stand-alone, passive devices not an integral part of any ("c' ,,'c' carrier network; (2) involves direct-to-user applications; (3) involves recE:ption of encrypted video and audio transmissions; and (4) does not infringe on any obligations owed to INTELSAT. See Communications Satellite Corporation, '7 FCC Rcd 6028 (Com. Car. Bur. 1992), app. for review pending. 5 Amendment of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules and Requlations to R§duce Alien Carrier Interference between Fixed-Satellites at Reduced Orbital Spacings and to Revise Application Processing Procedures for Satellite Communicat,ismfi Services, 6 FCC Rcd 2806 (1991) (Part 25 Order) 6 Part 25 Order at 2807-08. 7 Id. 2 4. Comsat's petition to repeal Section 25.131(j) (1) states that the underlying concerns expressed in the Part 25 Order for retaining the licensing requirement for international receive-only earth stations no longer exist. In that order, we raised questions about U.S. obligations to INTELSAT and Inmarsat. However, Comsat notes that there is no INTELSAT requirement that receive-only earth stations operating with the system be licensed by member administrations. Comsat states INTELSAT is only concerned about the potential for harmful interference, which inherently is not a factor with receive-only earth stations. In fact, Comsat observes that a number of countries already permit unlicensed receive-only earth stations to access INTELSAT. In addition, Comsat argues that nothing in the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (Satellite Act), nor the Communications Act of 1934 (Communications Act) precludes the elimination of the current licensing requirement. 5. Five parties support Comsat's petition to repeal the rule, reiterating Comsat's arguments that the licensing requirement is time-consuming, burdensome, not required by INTELSAT or any U.S. statutes, and no longer appears to serve any useful public interest purpose. S Three parties oppose the petition to some degree, arguing Comsat has failed to justify an immediate repeal of Section 25.131(j) (1). However, all of the opposing parties support, in general, the initiation of a rulemaking to address the issues raised by Comsat's petition. 9 III. DISCUSSION 6. The Commission already has eliminated the licensing requirement for domestic receive-only earth stations in the fixed-satellite service, substituting a voluntary registration program in its place. These changes were prompted by the increasing competition in the satellite industry, the resulting stimulation of new and increased services, and the Commission's desire to prevent the benefits of this competition from being frustrated by delays in authorizing earth station facilities and by imposing unnecessary burdens on applicants. 10 To date, the Commission's experience with deregulation of domestic receive-only ~arth stations has been positive. 8 The parties supporting Comsat' s proposal are Scientific-Atlanta, SSE Technologies Inc. (SSE), Andrew Corporation (an informal letter), Brightstar Communications, Ltd. (Brightstar), and IDB Communications Group, Inc. (IDB). 9 Th'e part~es express~ng. some form of opposition to Comsat's petition are GE American Communications, Inc. (GE American), Pan American Satellite (PanAmSat), and GTE Spacenet Corporation (GTE). 10 Amendment of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations to Reduce Alien Carrier Interference Between Fixed-Satellites at Reduced Orbital Spacings and to Revise Application Processing Procedures for Satellite Communication Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 2 FCC Rcd 762, 767 (1987); see also Deregulation of Domestic Receive-Only Satellite Earth Stations, 104 FCC 2d 348 (1986); Regulation of Domestic Receive-Only Satellite Earth Stations, 74 FCC 2d 205 (1979). 3 7. However, the Commission has declined to eliminate the licensing requirement for international receive-only earth stations, other than those used to provide INTELNET I service, due to concerns about U. S. obligations to INTELSAT and Inmarsat. Due to changes in the international satellite arena, as confirmed by the record generated by Comsat's petition, we now believe there is no longer a basis for these concerns. ·We also note that the same factors which prompted us to eliminate the licensing requirements for domestic receive-only earth stations are also prevalent in the international satellite market place. We therefore tentatively conclude that the time has come to remove the licensing requirement for international receive-only earth stations in the fixed-satellite service. 8. Earth Stations Accessing the INTELSAT System. INTELSAT is introducing various small antenna services. For instance, the high power and large coverage area of the INTELSAT K satellite permit the downsizing of receive-only earth stations to such small dimensions that it is now economically feasible to transmit international video and audio programming directly to user locations that potentially number in the thousands. Administration of a licensing program for these stations would be burdensome and possibly hinder the rapid introduction of these new services. Therefore, we believe that elimination of the licensing requirement would be in the public interest. In support, Comsat states that the concerns it expressed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
    NASA Reference Publication 1390 - j Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center ° MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives. .o° 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Global Satellite Communications Technology and Systems
    International Technology Research Institute World Technology (WTEC) Division WTEC Panel Report on Global Satellite Communications Technology and Systems Joseph N. Pelton, Panel Chair Alfred U. Mac Rae, Panel Chair Kul B. Bhasin Charles W. Bostian William T. Brandon John V. Evans Neil R. Helm Christoph E. Mahle Stephen A. Townes December 1998 International Technology Research Institute R.D. Shelton, Director Geoffrey M. Holdridge, WTEC Division Director and ITRI Series Editor 4501 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21210-2699 WTEC Panel on Satellite Communications Technology and Systems Sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States Government. Dr. Joseph N. Pelton (Panel Chair) Dr. Charles W. Bostian Mr. Neil R. Helm Institute for Applied Space Research Director, Center for Wireless Deputy Director, Institute for George Washington University Telecommunications Applied Space Research 2033 K Street, N.W., Rm. 304 Virginia Tech George Washington University Washington, DC 20052 Blacksburg, VA 24061-0111 2033 K Street, N.W., Rm. 340 Washington, DC 20052 Dr. Alfred U. Mac Rae (Panel Chair) Mr. William T. Brandon President, Mac Rae Technologies Principal Engineer Dr. Christoph E. Mahle 72 Sherbrook Drive The Mitre Corporation (D270) Communications Satellite Consultant Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922 202 Burlington Road 5137 Klingle Street, N.W. Bedford, MA 01730 Washington, DC 20016 Dr. Kul B. Bhasin Chief, Satellite Networks Dr. John V. Evans Dr. Stephen A. Townes and Architectures Branch Vice President Deputy Manager, Communications NASA Lewis Research Center and Chief Technology Officer Systems and Research Section MS 54-2 Comsat Corporation Jet Propulsion Laboratory 21000 Brookpark Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Iilglnal RECEIVED FEB 2 0 1992 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Commlllicalions Commission Washington, D.C
    IIlGlNAl RECEIVED FEB 2 0 1992 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Commlllicalions Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Office of the Secretary In re Petition of ) ««1- lq5\ iU:W\~ OIVISj0]~ ) INTEfit/i-\ i ,. ACIU fiES cor~/::\i1~-)\~ '~:~~!fF1 [.L:n~AU COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE CORPORATION ) ) ",,.., , For repeal of section 25.131(j) (1) ) fEB 2. --t -.. -- of the Commission's Rules and, in the ) interim, for waiver of that section ) as it applies to services provided ) via the INTELSAT K satellite ) PETITION FOR REPEAL AND, IN THE INTERIM, FOR WAIVER communications Satellite Corporation, through its COMSAT World Systems business unit ("COMSAT"), pursuant to sections 1.401 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, hereby petitions for repeal of section 25.131(j) (1) of those Rules and, in the interim, for waiver of that section of the Rules as it applies to services provided via the new INTELSAT K satellite. Section 25.131(j) (1) currently specifies that receive-only earth stations operating with INTELSAT space stations (except for receive-only earth stations used to receive INTELNET I services) shall file an FCC Form 493 requesting a license for such stations. DISCUSSION The Commission has long since decided not to require licenses for domestic receive-only earth stations. This policy - 2 - was first adopted in 1979,1 and the trend toward deregulation of such stations has been continued in two subsequent orders, in 19862 and 1991. 3 Today, domestic receive-only earth stations are sUbject only to a voluntary registration program. The Commission also determined in its 1986 Equatorial ruling that receive-only earth stations operating with the INTELSAT system for the provision of INTELNET I services need not be SUbject to any licensing requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • An Elementary Approach Towards Satellite Communication
    AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION WRITERS Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications: 06/2021 APRIL-2021 Publisher Certificate No: 36934 E-ISBN: 978-605-7594-89-1 Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications All kinds of publication rights of this scientific book belong to GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLICATIONS. Without the written permission of the publisher, the whole or part of the book cannot be printed, broadcast, reproduced or distributed electronically, mechanically or by photocopying. The responsibility for all information and content in this Book, visuals, graphics, direct quotations and responsibility for ethics / institutional permission belongs to the respective authors. In case of any legal negativity, the institutions that support the preparation of the book, especially GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLISHING, the institution (s) responsible for the editing and design of the book, and the book editors and other person (s) do not accept any “material and moral” liability and legal responsibility and cannot be taken under legal obligation. We reserve our rights in this respect as GÜVEN GROUP CONSULTANCY “PUBLISHING” INC. CO. in material and moral aspects. In any legal problem/situation TURKEY/ISTANBUL courts are authorized. This work, prepared and published by Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co., has ISO: 10002: 2014- 14001: 2004-9001: 2008-18001: 2007 certificates. This work is a branded work by the TPI “Turkish Patent Institute” with the registration number “Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 1992
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 1992 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 1992 Activities 1993 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration ................................................................................................................ 1 Department of Defense ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Department of Commerce ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Department of Energy .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Department of Interior ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Department of Agriculture .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202-418-2830; Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SES-00585 Wednesday March 10, 2004 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INFORMATION RE: ACTIONS TAKEN The Commission, by its International Bureau, took the following actions pursuant to delegated authority. The effective dates of the actions are the dates specified. SES-AMD-20031124-01710 E E020242 HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC. Amendment Grant of Authority Date Effective: 03/03/2004 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: LITTLETON LOCATION: 7235 W. TITAN ROAD, DOUGLAS, LITTLETON, CO 39 ° 30 ' 52.00 " N LAT. 105 ° 1 ' 30.00 " W LONG. ANTENNA ID: ANT-8 8 meters VERTEX 1514L-01-00 29500.0000 - 30000.0000 MHz 1M30F9D 50.00 dBW COMPOSITE MODULATED COMMAND/RANGING SIGNAL 29500.0000 - 30000.0000 MHz NON 53.10 dBW UNMODULATED CW CARRIER 19700.0000 - 20200.0000 MHz 106KG9D COMPOSITE TELEMETRY/RANGING SIGNAL ANTENNA ID: TF TR 1.8 1.8 meters PRODELIN 3180-131 19700.0000 - 20200.0000 MHz 106KG9D COMPOSITE TELEMETRY/RANGING SIGNAL 29500.0000 - 30000.0000 MHz 1M30F9D 50.00 dBW COMPOSITE MODULATED COMMAND/RANGING SIGNAL 29500.0000 - 30000.0000 MHz NON 42.80 dBW UNMODULATED CW CARRIER Page 1 of 19 SITE ID: TF TR 1.8M LOCATION: Points of Communication: LITTLETON - SPACEWAY1 - (99.0 W.L.) LITTLETON - SPACEWAY2 - (101.0 W.L.) LITTLETON - SPACEWAY3 - (103 W.L.) SES-AMD-20040220-00257 E E030336 LCN International, LLC Amendment Withdrawn Date Effective: 03/03/2004 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service, Fixed Satellite Service, International Fixed Satellite Service SITE ID: 1 LOCATION: 105 Executive Drive, USA, Sterling, VA 38 ° 59 ' 7.00 " N LAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Centaur Launches
    Centaur Launch Record 1962 -2012 No Veh No Date Failure Payload Launch Vehicle Mgmt. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Centaur Developmental Program 1 AC- 1 05.09.1962 F* Centaur AC-1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-A MSFC 2 AC- 2 11.27.1963 Centaur AC-2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-B Lewis 3 AC- 3 06.30.1964 F Centaur AC-3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 4 AC- 4 12.11.1964 Surveyor-Model -1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 5 AC- 5 03.02.1965 F Surveyor-SD 1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-C Lewis 6 AC- 6 08.11.1965 Surveyor-SD 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 7 AC- 8 04.07.1966 Surveyor-SD 3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis Centaur-D Surveyor Missions 8 AC- 10 05.30.1966 Surveyor 1 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 9 AC- 7 09.20.1966 Surveyor 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 10 AC- 9 10.26.1966 Surveyor-SD 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 11 AC- 12 04.17.1967 Surveyor 3 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 12 AC- 11 07.14.1967 Surveyor 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 13 AC- 13 09.08.1967 Surveyor 5 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 14 AC- 14 11.07.1967 Surveyor 6 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 15 AC- 15 01.07.1968 Surveyor 7 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis Centaur-D Spacecraft and Satellites 16 AC- 17 08.10.1968 F ATS 4 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 17 AC- 16 12.07.1968 OAO 2 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 18 AC- 20 02.24.1969 Mariner 6 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 19 AC- 19 03.27.1969 Mariner 7 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 20 AC- 18 08.12.1969 ATS 5 Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 21 AC- 21 11.30.1970 F OAO B Atlas-LV3C Centaur-D Lewis 22 AC- 25 01.25.1971
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Review
    COMSAT Technical Review Volume 21 Number 2, Fall 1991 Advisory Board Joel R. Alper Joseph V. Charyk COMSAT TECHNICAL REVIEW John V. Evans Volume 21 Number 2, Fall 1991 John. S. Hannon Editorial Board Richard A. Arndt, Chairman S. Joseph Campanella 273 FOREWORD: MAKING REALITY OUT OF A VISION Dattakumar M. Chitre P. J. Madon William L. Cook 275 EDITORIAL NOTE Calvin B. Cotner S. B. Bennett AND G. Hyde Allen D. Dayton Russell J. Fang Ramesh K. Gupta INTELSAT VI: From Spacecraft to Satellite Operation Michael A. Holley 279 ENSURING A RELIABLE SATELLITE Edmund Jurkiewicz C. E. Johnson, Ivor N. Knight R. R. Persinger, J. J. Lemon AND K. J. Volkert George M. Metze 05 INTELSAT VI LAUNCH OPERATIONS, DEPLOYMENT, AND BUS Alfred A. Norcott IN-ORBIT TESTING Hans J. Weiss L. S. Virdee, T. L. Edwards, A. J. Corio AND T. Rush Amir I. Zaghloul ast Editors Pier L. Bargellini, 1971-1983 39 IN-ORBIT RE TEST OF AN INTELSAT VI SPACECRAFT Geoffrey Hyde, 1984-1988 G. E. G. Rosell, B. Teixeira, A. Olimpiew , B. A. Pettersson AND Editorial Staff MANAGING EDITOR S. B. Sanders Margaret B. Jacocks 391 DESIGN AND OPERATION OF A POST-1989 INTELSAT TTC&M TECHNICAL EDITOR EARTH STATION Barbara J. Wassell PRODUCTION R. J. Skroban AND D. J. Belanger Barbara J. Wassell 11 INTELSAT COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS Virginia M. Ingram M. E. Wheeler N. Kay Flesher Margaret R. Savane 431 INTELSAT VI SPACECRAFT OPERATIONS CIRCULATION G. S. Smith Merilee J. Worsey Non-INTELSAT VI Papers COMSAT TECHNICAL REVIEW is published by the Communications Satellite 455 MULTILINGUAL SUBJECTIVE METHODOLOGY AND EVALUATION OF Corporation (COMSAT).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Use of Satellite Television in High Energy Physics
    On the use of Satellite Television in High Energy Physics Lucas Taylor1) and David O. Williams2) 1) Northeastern University, Boston ([email protected]) 2) CERN, Geneva ([email protected]) Invited talk at CHEP’98, Chicago, USA August 31 - September 4, 1998 Abstract This paper assesses the feasibility of exploiting commercial satellite television technologies to broadcast video signals and data from major High Energy Physics facilities to collaborating institutes throughout the world. 1 Introduction Satellite Television (STV) broadcasting consists of the transmission of a video (or other) signal from an earth station to a geostationary satellite which subsequently broadcasts the signal back to the earth where it can be received over a wide area [1,2]. The schematic layout of an STV system is shown in figure 1. First the production facility provides a video signal to the satellite uplink transmitter. A transponder on the satellite receives the uplink signal, modifies the frequency, amplifies it, and rebroadcasts a polarised microwave signal back to earth. This signal is received using a parabolic antenna which relays it to an analogue and/or digital receiver which converts the signal to a format suitable for display on a television set or recording on a sequential or random access medium such as video tape or compact disk. Satellite Television (STV) systems are used not only by television broadcasters but also by an increas- ing number of commercial and governmental organisations for a multitude of purposes, including: news feeds; organisation-wide meetings and announcements; training, referred to as Interactive Distance Learning (IDL); and for liaison with the press, for example for the announcement of new products.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
    NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor Neutral ThermosphereNeutral Thermal Environment Solar EnvironmentSolar ll SSppaacc Plasma rraa ee uu EE tt nn v aa v Ionizing i Ionizing i r Meteoroid/ N N r Radiation o Orbital Debris o Radiation e e n n h h m m T T e e n n t t s s Geomagnetic Field Gravitational Field August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 i PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +49 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by T. Flohrer Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00086-OPS-GR Issue 14 Revision 1 Date of Issue 17 February 2012 Status Issued Document Type TN Distribution open European Space Agency Agence spatiale européenne Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2011. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 70 deg) is analysed. From 1234 objects for which orbital data are available, 406 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 629 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 18 whose status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 74 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1307 . During 2011 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Thirteen of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, one of those below the GEO protected region. Three spacecraft were reorbited too low. We identified one spacecraft that seems to be abandoned or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all in 2009 and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Communications
    Contents Guest editorial Terminals for mobile satellite communications Odd Gutteberg 3 Jens Andenæs 49 Elements of satellite technology Future systems for mobile satellite and communication communications Odd Gutteberg 4 Per Hovstad and Odd Gutteberg 54 Satellite communications Effects of atmosphere on earth-space radio standardisation in Europe propagation Gunnar Stette 22 Odd Gutteberg 63 A review of Norwegian space activities The use of millimetre waves in Georg Rosenberg 26 satellite communications Tord Fredriksen 71 TSAT - a low-cost satellite communication network The effect of interference for an OBP system Terje Pettersen and Petter Chr Amundsen 31 utilising the geostationary orbit Per Hovstad 75 Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) systems - basic principles and design Earth station antenna technology Liv Oddrun Voll and Gunn Kristin Klungsøyr 39 Arnfinn Nyseth and Svein A Skyttemyr 85 Fleet management using INMARSAT-C and GPS - a Norwegian pilot project Arvid Bertheau Johannessen 46 Guest editorial BY ODD GUTTEBERG Developing the Norwegian The Norwegian telecommunica- telecommunication network has tions industry has been very always been a challenging effort. active since satellite transmis- This is due to this country’s spe- sion was introduced in Norway. cial topography and its scattered Among other things they are population. Furthermore, it has manufacturing the earth stations been difficult to establish reliable in NORSAT-B, and coastal communications with the mer- earth stations and mobile termi- chant fleet, oil rigs, and an nals for the different important Norwegian outpost - INMARSAT standards. Norwe- the Arctic islands of Svalbard gian industry has also developed (Spitzbergen). a new data collection satellite system, called TSAT (Teleme- In the early sixties, it became try via SATellite).
    [Show full text]