Chapter One: Introduction I. the Looks of Wordsworth by the 1830S, Wordsworth Had Become a National Icon. in 1832, Henry Willi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter One: Introduction I. the Looks of Wordsworth by the 1830S, Wordsworth Had Become a National Icon. in 1832, Henry Willi Chapter One: Introduction I. The Looks of Wordsworth By the 1830s, Wordsworth had become a national icon. In 1832, Henry William Pickersgill, at the request of St. John’s College, Cambridge, painted the first well-known portraiture of Wordsworth. In this picture, Wordsworth, then 62 years old, is placed sitting beside a rock, with Rydal mountain, sky, and sea as backdrop. With a pen and paper in his left hand, Wordsworth in the picture is turning his head right and projecting his eyes towards the left-center part of the picture, creating an effect of harmony from the left/right balance. Months later after the completion of this picture and its exhibition in St. John’s College, the reviewer for The Athen œum expressed his disappointment with this portrait: [W]e demand for Wordsworth, not a look equal to the management of the stamp revenue for Westmorland alone, but something of that dignity of intellect which dictated his truly noble poems; we want a little inspiration; we desire such expression as will induce the spectator to say, “that is the look of a poet.” (no. 342 [17 May 1834], qtd. in Rovee) Another commentator on this portrait, Henry Crabb Robinson, thought that the portrait did not catch the disposition of Wordsworth’s eyes: “[t]he picture wants an oculist” (qtd. from Rovee 154). Onto his representation of his public image, Wordsworth at first passed only a brief judgment: “[w]e all like it exceedingly” ( Later Years , 2: 554), but in 1840, however, his attitude changed, seeming to have also detected the problem with the eyes, as had Robinson. He hoped for a chance to have another picture from Pickersgill: “If I go to London in the Spring, and my eyes should be in as good order as they are at present, the picture shall meet me there and I will get P. to retouch it” ( Later Years , 4:120). If the eyes in this portrait expressed 1 feelings of indifference suited only for a stamp collector, 1 the second well-known Wordsworth portrait, engraved by W. H. Watt in 1835 and used as frontispiece to the 1836 Poems , showed too much femininity. Compared with Pickersgill’s, here Wordsworth’s eyes show excess of tenderness, with the lower lip protruding to create an introverted image. Wordsworth was very dissatisfied with this portrait, thinking that the picture distorted him, or, at least, the public image he wanted to convey. The picture carries “an air of feebleness” and “a weakness of expression about the upper lip” ( Later Years , 3: 304). In a letter to his nephew, Christopher Wordsworth, this picture was further criticized as carrying with it an“air of decrepitude, and the maudlin expression about the upper lip” ( Later Years , 3: 343-44). If Pickersgill’s portrait lacks tenderness, Watt’s lacks the masculine, even powerful image Wordsworth had in mind. Wordsworth’s ideal self-image was realized in Benjamin Robert Haydon’s portrait Wordsworth on Helvellyn in 1842. In this portraiture, Wordsworth is in a pensive mood, with his hands folded and head lowered in front of Helvellyn. Rather than using nature as backdrop, as in Pickersgill’s, Wordsworth is standing in front, creating a huge sublime figure of solitude and imagination dwarfing the mountain and sky in back. On seeing Haydon’s picture, Wordsworth’s daughter Dora called it “perfection” (qtd. in Rovee 170). If pensiveness and masculine power were the ideal attributes of his public image for Wordsworth, William Hazlitt’s description of Wordsworth also attests to the trueness of Haydon’s picture. In Hazlitt’s personal observation from his meeting with the poet, Wordsworth “lives in the busy solitude of his own heart; in the deep silence of thought,” a brooding figure of “heroic proportions” (qtd. in Rovee 169). “[S]olitude,” “thought,” “heroic” epitomize the stereo typical image of Wordsworth. In his effort to create the image of the “dignity of intellect” in his “noble poems,” 1 In 1813 Wordsworth received the official position of the Distributor of Stamps for Westmorland. 2 Wordsworth has successfully created a unified public image. For almost two hundred years, Wordsworth has been recognized as a disembodied poet, his mind an epitome of the masculine power of the imagination. The process of constructing a unified inner self out of the “body” of the text has long been manipulated in Wordsworth’s collected poems, those published since 1815, in which the chronological order was replaced with the aim to regroup them according to thematic subject. Zachary Leader notes the intention of this editorial manipulation: “Wordsworth’s insistence on a mostly thematic rather than chronological ordering of his poems in collected editions---[is] another manifestation of his sense of the self as single and unified” (665). The image of a single and unified self stems from a preference in the mind than the body. In addition to the portraits, descriptions from Wordsworth’s contemporaries also helped to promote the image of a unified self. It was first hinted in Thomas De Quincey’s physiognomic observation of Wordsworth: The nose, a little arched, and large; which, by the way… has always been accounted an unequivocal expression of animal appetites organically strong. And that expressed the simple truth: Wordsworth’s intellectual passions were fervent and strong. (qtd. in Hagstrum 144) The linkage between “a little arched, and large” nose with “an unequivocal expression of animal appetites” is a typical physiognomic diagnosis prevalent in the eighteenth century, but the “intellectual passions” detected from the same nose reveals De Quincey’s presupposition of Wordsworth as a strong poet. The relation between the shape of nose and the size of the animal appetites seemed clear since they both belong to the category of corporeal organs, but De Quincey transmuted the signs of animal passions into those of intellectual power. Dorothy Wordsworth once said that Wordsworth possessed: “a sort of violence of Affections… which demonstrates itself 3 every moment of the Day when the objects of his affection are present with him” (Letters: Early Years 83). The problem is: why do these affections and animal energies resist being transmuted from the portraits of Wordsworth, whether full-length picture or facial descriptions to his poetry? If De Quincey’s observation shows the unavoidable interpretation of Wordsworth’s looks, from the outside to the inside, from animal appetites to intellectual passions, then another Wordsworth contemporary, William Hazlitt, relentlessly pointed out the self-image created from Wordsworth’s poems: “One would suppose, from the tenor of his subjects, that on this earth there was neither marrying nor giving in marriage” (qtd. in Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism 143). In “neither marrying nor giving in marriage,” Hazlitt is referring to the absence of the sexual body in Wordsworth’s poetry. The avoidance of sex created the image, to use the words of M. H. Abrams, of an “asexual” and “ascetic” poet (ibid). Even when Wordsworth uses the word “wed,” “consummation,” they are used metaphorically to designate the wedding of the mind and the external world: “the discerning intellect of Man/When wedded to this goodly universe/In love and holy passion” ( Poems II, 52-58). Of course, during his lifetime, it cannot be said that Wordsworth forewent sexual relationships with women: e.g. his wife, Mary Hutchinson and his French lover Annette Vallon, 2 not to mention his “dear, dear Friend” Dorothy Wordsworth. The Wordsworth family hid the story of Annette Vallon for more than one hundred years, preserving the image of an ascetic, sublime nature poet, as created in Robert Haydon’s painting. 2 “In 1916 it was at last revealed publicly (scholarly insiders had known for some time) that Wordsworth had fathered a daughter on a French Royalist sympathizer when he was twenty-two years old. To some it was a relief to learn that Wordsworth had been like Keats and Shelley and Byron, a man with flesh and blood appetites, and not just a solitary visionary communing with Nature and the Universe, which is the figure most of the late portraits, busts, and statues conveyed. For others, though, the news had a more exciting meaning. Now one could see why Wordsworth’s early poetry is peopled with abandoned women and destitute figures and haunted guilty men. The haunted, guilty one was the poet himself. Further speculation about Wordsworth’s relation with his sister, Dorothy, added to the sense that the poetry up to, say, 1803 was the produce of a tormented spirit” (Stephen Gill “Introduction,” 2). 4 The avoidance of referring to Wordsworth’s body, especially the sexual body, results in a one-dimensional, uni-faceted image of Wordsworth. The legacy of the sublime, disembodied poet continues well into the twentieth century and dominates the circle of Wordsworth criticism. However, the sublime look of the poet is gradually revealed its different facets as Wordsworth criticism changed its methodology. Wordsworth criticism since the 1960s has generally proceeded in three main directions: the Yale School rhetorical criticism since the 1960s, (New) Historicist political criticism since the 1970s, and ecological criticism since the 1990s. The Yale School, represented by Geoffrey H. Hartman and Harold Bloom, directs their critical interest to the Romantic “vision.” Seeing nature and imagination as two forces fighting for Wordsworth’s soul, Hartman argues that “Wordsworth set out with less between himself and his imagination than perhaps any poet before him; he is somehow more vulnerable to apocalyptic starts and self-recognition” (101). In his The Visionary Company , Bloom emphasizes the power of imagination that enables Wordsworth to “blend” man and nature “into an apocalyptic unity” (127). This “apocalyptic unity,” from the perspective of the (New) Historicists, is contaminated with an historical engagement that betrays a hidden history of Wordsworth.
Recommended publications
  • Bishop Sarapion's Prayer-Book : an Egyptian Pontifical Dated Probably
    6 ti\>t<xty ofChe 'theological ^mimvy PRINCETON . NEW JERSEY PRESENTED BY B.B. Warfield's Library 1922 BR 45 .E36 v. Serapion, Bishop Sarapion ' s prayer- Idook BISHOP SARAPION'S PRAYER-BOOK : J/ £arli? Cburcb Classice BISHOP SARAPIONS PRAYER-BOOK AN EGYPTIAN PONTIFICAL DATED PROBABLY ABOUT A.D. 350—356 TRANSLATED FROM THE EDITION OF DR. G. WOBBERMIN WITH INTRODUCTION, NOTES, AND INDICES / BY JOHN WORDSWORTH, D.D. HISHOP OF SALISBURY LONDON SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, W.C. NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, CHARING CROSS, ; STREET, E.C. 43, QUEEN VICTORIA Stkhet. Brighton : 129, North B. YOUNG & CO. New York : E. J. 1899 PUBIJSHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE TRACT COMMITTEE. CONTENTS Introduction :— § I. Date and importance of the book. Descrip- tion of the MS 7 § 2. Personality and character of Sarapion of Thmuis, His orthodoxy in regard to the doctrine of the holy Spirit. Question of the Doxology . lo " § 3. Was Sarapion author of the Letter Con- " cerning Father and Son ? . -19 § 4. The Collection of Prayers. Their general contents, style, and character. Unity of their style. Evidence of Egyptian origin 23 § 5. The Eucharistic Liturgy. The Pro-Anaphora. Prayers 19—30. Division into two Books. The Laodicene Canons. Tabular view cf the Liturgy of Sarapion 3- §6. The Eucharistic Liturgy (<:?«//«^/). Tabular view of the Anaphora. Prayers i — 5. Points of importance in the Consecration Prayer. " Like- ness." Position of the " Institution." Eucharistic Sacrifice. Invocation of the Logos. Traces of it elsewhere ......••• 4° §7. The Baptismal Prayers, 7— II. Hallowing of the Waters. Confirmation a separate rite . • 49 — 6 CONTENTS PAGE § 8.
    [Show full text]
  • \¥ Ads Worth Family
    "The thought of our past years in me doth breed perpetual benediction."- TVordswort/1. TWO HUNDRED. AND FIFTY YEARS -OF THE--- \¥ ADS WORTH FAMILY IN AMERICA. (WITH ILLUSTRATIONS.) CONTAINING AN ACCOUNT OF THE FAMILY REUNION, AT DUXBURY, MASS,, SEPTEMBER 13, 1882, AND A GENEALOGICAL REGISTER, PREPARED EXPRESSLY FOR THIS WORK, ---BY--- HORACE ANDREW WADSWORTH, AUTHOR OF "QUARTER-CENTENNIAL HISTORY OF LAWRENCE, AND PUBLISHER OF THE LAWRENCE DAILY AND ESSEX WEEKLY EAGLE, LAWRENCE,.MASS, LAWRENCE, MASS.: p, , . D AT THE EAGLE STEAM JOB PRlNTrNG ROOMS, 1883. PREFACE. It is not without misgivings that this volume is handed to my kinsmen and namesakes, as a History of'' Two Hundred and Fifty Years of the \Vadsworth Family in America." The subject covers a great deal, and could be extended · ad infinitum. To collect, edit and publish, what really should find a place in the family history, would be the work of at least twenty years, and I find that the family historians of many well known names have been busy at least that time, and still the task is not completed. But the author of this history cannot delay twenty years, ten years, or even five years. The demand for the work will not admit of it. Letters have been received, almost daily, with the question, " How soon will the history be completed?" Not a few of our people who are deeply interested in this work, have reached, or passed, the ripe age of three score years anrl ten, and for their benefit, if for no other reason the promised work should be forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Descending Caves: Descent Narratives and the Subterranean Science and Literature of the Long Eighteenth Century 1680 - 1830
    Descending Caves: Descent Narratives and the Subterranean Science and Literature of the Long Eighteenth Century 1680 - 1830 Damian Frank Pearson Thesis submitted in fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Literature Department of English and Creative Writing Lancaster University June 2018 Frank Pearson Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Abstract vi Introduction: The Underworld and the Underground 1 Structure 6 Cave Context 9 The Origin of Cave Science 13 Descent Narratives and the Hidden Recesses of Nature 21 Subterranean Aesthetics 35 The Space and Place of the Underground 40 Travel, Curiosity and the Descent Narrative 44 Cave Representations 49 Chapter One: Establishing Cave Science Introduction: Natural Philosophy and Literary Science 51 The Royal Society, Fieldwork and the Concept of Nature 58 Biblical Theories of Cave Geomorphology 66 Caves and the Origin of Subterraneous Water 69 Cave Geomorphology and Erosion 75 Caves and Deep Time 79 Joseph Black, Fixed Air, Carbon Dioxide and Limestone Solution 85 James Hutton and Limestone Solution 95 Adam Walker and the Exploration of caves 100 Charles Lyell and the Formation of Caves 108 Conclusion 112 Chapter Two: Cave Myth and Literature Introduction: The Descent Narrative, Underworld and Hell 114 Thomas Burnet and the Sublime Underworld 122 The Subterranean Sublime in Descent Poetry 125 The Descent Narrative as Parody 132 The Descent Narrative as a State of Mind 134 Caves and the Poetry of Place 140 Descent Narratives and the Novel 147 Conclusion 156 Chapter Three: Caves
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury - St
    Salisbury - St. Nicholas Hospital Masters 1244-1895 Year Date Surname Given Name Title Notes 1244 Sarum Nicholaus Subdean probably Nicholas Laking 1244 Wyle, de la Walter Succentor c.1246 York, of William Provost, Bishop provost of Beverley. (Elected Bishop, with royal assent 10 December., 1246. Consecrated Bishop Of Sarum, 14 July, 1247.) 1254 Laking Nicholas Custos. see entry 1244 1259-60 Bridport, de Giles Bishop Bishop of Sarum, 11 Mar., 1256-7, custos. c.1267 Ashley, de Adam Brother, Prior c.1270 Wyle, de la Walter Bishop Bishop, 27 May, 1263 1271 Wykehampton or Robert Bishop Wickhampton Bishop, 1274, had been elected with royal assent, 6 Mar., 1271. c.1281 Burnes or Burnel John Custos, Vicar Custos, vicar of Damerham c.1287 Brandeston Henry Bishop 1288 Oakham Laurence Bishop elect Oakham, or Akkoburne, Bishop Elect, died at Canterbury 8 Aug., 1288, before he could receive confirmation as Bishop. 1289 Hinton John Master c.1290 Corner, de la William Bishop Bishop , 8 May, 1289, surname 'de la Comer'as it was sometimes written c.1298 Godalming, de Robert Master c.1299 Schirbourne, de Wlater resigned 20 Sept., 1300, Gandavo 1300 Hackfield Robert Master 1300 20-Sep Wokingham William Bp. Simon de Gandavo 1305 Netheravon John Custos Bp. Simon de Gandavo 1321 Wither Thomas Master, or Keeper 1321 Boyton, de William Chaplain 1322 Romseye, de Peter Rector, Chaplain Rector of Donhead St Andrew, admitted Chaplain 1325 Abingdon William Rector Rector of Patney and Broughton Gifford. Bp. Roger de Mortival 1328 Romseye, de Peter Rector Rector of Donhead St Andrew. Chaplain in 1322 1337 Kirkby John Rector Rector of Barford.
    [Show full text]
  • Mont Blanc in British Literary Culture 1786 – 1826
    Mont Blanc in British Literary Culture 1786 – 1826 Carl Alexander McKeating Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Leeds School of English May 2020 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Carl Alexander McKeating to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Carl Alexander McKeating in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Acknowledgements I am grateful to Frank Parkinson, without whose scholarship in support of Yorkshire-born students I could not have undertaken this study. The Frank Parkinson Scholarship stipulates that parents of the scholar must also be Yorkshire-born. I cannot help thinking that what Parkinson had in mind was the type of social mobility embodied by the journey from my Bradford-born mother, Marie McKeating, who ‘passed the Eleven-Plus’ but was denied entry into a grammar school because she was ‘from a children’s home and likely a trouble- maker’, to her second child in whom she instilled a love of books, debate and analysis. The existence of this thesis is testament to both my mother’s and Frank Parkinson’s generosity and vision. Thank you to David Higgins and Jeremy Davies for their guidance and support. I give considerable thanks to Fiona Beckett and John Whale for their encouragement and expert interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2019 The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas Virginia Elizabeth Martin Tilley College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, and the Musicology Commons Recommended Citation Tilley, Virginia Elizabeth Martin, "The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1385. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1385 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 The Feast of Saint Thomas Becket at Salisbury Cathedral: Ad Vesperas A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Music from The College of William and Mary by Virginia Elizabeth Martin Tilley Accepted for __________________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ________________________________________ Thomas B. Payne, Director, Music ________________________________________ James I. Armstrong, Music ________________________________________ Alexander B. Angelov, Religious Studies Williamsburg, VA 12 April
    [Show full text]
  • 114902270.23.Pdf
    A6sT."n.i°l ^ <U^r -itrA. i<lX. - L A HISTORY OF ENGLISH LITERATURE FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS BY J. LOGIE ROBERTSON, M.A. FIRST ENGLISH MASTER, EDINBURGH LADIES1 COLLEGE NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS 1894 Copyright, 1894, by Harper & Brothers. All rights reserved. p D>P Oj. S20*5?’FEQ- B \ 19 76/^ PREFACE This book has been written, in the first instance, to meet the requirements of my own classes in their prep- aration for the Leaving Certificate, the University Lo- cal, and other Public Examinations. I have good reason, however, for believing that the want of a new text-book of Literature is pretty generally felt, and in that belief the book is published for the use of secondary schools and private students. It embodies the practical expe- rience of nearly twenty years’ teaching of the subject with which it deals. The book is a brief review of English Literature throughout its entire extent, from 449 to 1894. This long stretch of history is taken in six convenient periods, and a survey is made of each period, first in its political, and secondly in its literary aspect. A classification of the leading authors of the period is then made, and is followed by biographical and critical sketches, contain- ing the most recent results in fact and fair criticism. In treating of the poets I have made it a special feature of the book to give specimens from their work at once characteristic of their style and illustrative of their gen- ius. Notice is taken of most, if not all, of the minor authors of established reputation ; and each period is closed with pretty full chronological lists of the various authors belonging to it, and the more important works which they produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Tributes February 2020
    MISSION PARTNERS’ FELLOWSHIP Tributes February 2020 Dr (Lilian) Stella Walters died July 2019 Nigel, Stella’s son, writes: Stella was born Lilian Starr Underhill in 1925 in Peshawar on the north west frontier of British India, in what is now Pakistan. Her father was an officer in the Indian Army and mother a nurse with the Church Mission Society, who, at the age of 39 and being of small frame and carrying a large baby, did not expect to survive the birth. So, she wrote a very moving letter to her unborn child, dedicating her to the service of God; the simplest way of describing Stella’s life is as a fulfilment of that commitment. Her mother did survive, the following year her brother Harry was born, and then in 1929 the family moved back to Britain, to Farnham in Surrey, where Stella and Harry both grew up. In 1943, Stella was accepted to study medicine at the Royal Free Hospital in London. In February 1945 she was injured in a V2 rocket attack; she had been working in a basement laboratory, and suffered acid burns to her head and neck. She had skin grafts, and plastic surgery to remake her ear. After a year’s convalescence she returned to medical school, going on to qualify as an obstetrician and gynaecologist. Having trained at Foxbury from 1953, she went to Pakistan in 1955, with CMS like her mother and grandfather before her. She learned Urdu and some Pashtu and worked briefly in Quetta and Multan, before moving to Bannu in the north west frontier province, where she worked until 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Browns Strangers Handbook and Illustrated
    l i u r C a th e d r a l W e st ro nt o lo n S a s b y , F , b g tto d tto r t Di , i , up igh tto f ro m No rt - W e st o lon Di , h , b g tto d tto o l on Di , i , b g tto E ast En d r t Di , , up igh tto d tto o lon Di , i , b g ’ tto f rom B s o s a la e o lo n Di , i h p P c , b g tto f 1 o m a la e r o n d s r t Di , P c G u , up igh tto d tto o lon Di , i , b tg" tto So t e w f r° cm the a e r ht Di , u h Vi L k , up ig tto d tto o lon Di , i ,”b g tto from H arn am o lo n Di , h , b g tto f ro m C ow an e o lon Di , L , b g tto S re from Clo s te rs r t Di , pi i , up igh tto f ro m th e R e r o lon Di , iv , b g tto d tto o lon Di , i b g ’ tto f ro m B s o s al a e o lon Di , i h p P c , b g tto W e s t o orw a o lon Di , D y , b g tto Stat e s i n W e s t ront r t Di , u F , up igh ’ tto B s o s a la e No rt o lo n Di , i h p P c , h , b g tto d tto So t o lon Di , i , u h , b g tto Clo s te r s Inte r or o lon Di , i , i , b g D tto C o r lo o n E a st r t i , h i ki g , up igh tto C o r and S r e e n loo n E ast o lo n Di , h i c ki g , b g tto C o r lo o n E a st r t Di , h i ki g , up igh tt o C o r loo n W e s t r t Di , h i ki g , up igh tto d tto o l on Di , i , b g tto C o r an d S r e e n loo n E a s t r t Di , h i c ki g , up igh tto d tto o lon Di , i , b g tto C o r a n d Na e lo o n W e s t o lo n Di , h i v ki g , b g tto a e E a st r t Di , N v , , up igh tto Na e lo o n E as t o lo n Di , v ki g , b g tto Na e loo n W e s t o lo n Di , v ki g , b g tto Re re d o s o lon Di , , b g tto d tto l t Di , i , up igh tt o ort and So t Tra nse ts o lo n Di , N h u h p , b g ’ i tto E a rl o f He rtf o rd s Mo n me nt r t D , u , up ig h tto ad C a e l o lo n Di , L y h p , b g tto Cha te r Ho s e Inte r or o lon Di , p u , i , b g ’ tto B s o H am lto n s o m o l o n Di , i h p i T b , b g ’ tto B s o Mo e rl s To m o l on Di , i h p b y b , b g S a l i s b u r P r t y , o u l t ry C r o s s , up igh tto H Stre e t ate So t o lon Di , igh G , u h , b g tto d tto Nort ri t Di , i , h , up gh ’ tt t nn t W t l n o S .
    [Show full text]
  • Alt Context 1861-1896
    1861 – Context – 168 Agnes Martin; or, the fall of Cardinal Wolsey. / Martin, Agnes.-- 8o..-- London, Oxford [printed], [1861]. Held by: British Library The Agriculture of Berkshire. / Clutterbuck, James Charles.-- pp. 44. ; 8o..-- London; Slatter & Rose: Oxford : Weale; Bell & Daldy, 1861. Held by: British Library Analysis of the history of England, (from William Ist to Henry VIIth,) with references to Hallam, Guizot, Gibbon, Blackstone, &c., and a series of questions / Fitz-Wygram, Loftus, S.C.L.-- Second ed.-- 12mo.-- Oxford, 1861 Held by: National Library of Scotland An Answer to F. Temple's Essay on "the Education of the World." By a Working Man. / Temple, Frederick, Successively Bishop of Exeter and of London, and Archbishop of Canterbury.-- 12o..-- Oxford, 1861. Held by: British Library Answer to Professor Stanley's strictures / Pusey, E. B. (Edward Bouverie), 1800-1882.-- 6 p ; 22 cm.-- [Oxford] : [s.n.], [1861] Notes: Caption title.-- Signed: E.B. Pusey Held by: Oxford Are Brutes immortal? An enquiry, conducted mainly by the light of nature into Bishop Butler's hypotheses and concessions on the subject, as given in part 1. chap. 1. of his "Analogy of Religion." / Boyce, John Cox ; Butler, Joseph, successively Bishop of Bristol and of Durham.-- pp. 70. ; 8o..-- Oxford; Thomas Turner: Boroughbridge : J. H. & J. Parker, 1861. Held by: British Library Aristophanous Ippes. The Knights of Aristophanes / with short English notes [by D.W. Turner] for the use of schools.-- 56, 58 p ; 16mo.-- Oxford, 1861 Held by: National Library of Scotland Arnold Prize Essay, 1861. The Christians in Rome during the first three centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reminiscences of Alexander Dyce Alexander Dyce
    THE REMINISCENCES OF ALEXANDER DYCE ALEXANDER DYCE FROM AN ENGRAVING BY C. H. JEENS. REPRODUCED BY COURTESY OF THE VICTORIA & ALBERT MUSEUM. THE Reminiscences OF Alexander Dyce EDITED, WITH A BIOGRAPHY BY RICHARD J. SCHRADER OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Copyright © 1972 by the Ohio State University Press All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 75-157716 Standard Book Number 8142-0160-1 Manufactured in the United States of America FOR MY PARENTS CONTENTS FOREWORD x i ALEXANDER DYCE 3 EDITORIAL PRINCIPLES 2 9 THE REMINISCENCES 3 3 PREFACE TO CHAPTER I 35 CHAPTER ONE : Early Years 39 SCOTLAND. % MARY ANN PATON. J SIR DAVID OCHTERLONY. % MRS. SMOLLETT. $ STRAW BERRY-HILL J LORD WALDEGRAVE. % CUMNOR PLACE (FROM MY DIARY). PREFACE TO CHAPTER II 5 1 CHAPTER TWO: The Stage 55 PART I : MAJOR CHARACTERS 5 5 EDMUND KEAN AND HIS WIFE. { CHARLES KEAN. % JOH N KEMBLE. $ MRS. CHARLES KEMBLE (MISS DE CAMP), t MRS. SIDDONS. PART 2 : MINOR CHARACTERS 9 9 GIOVANNI B. BELZONI. % MRS. MARY ANN DAVENPORT) WILLIAM FARREN, &C. $ MRS. GIBBS. % MRS. DOROTHY Vlll CONTENT S JORDAN. | JAMES KENNEY AND HIS LAST DRAMATIC PRODUCTION, t JOHN HENDERSON'S AND CHARLES MACKLIN'S SHYLOCK ; GEORGE F. COOKE'S RICHARD THE THIRD, SIR PERTINAX MACSYCOPHANT, AND SIR ARCHY MACSARCASM; MACKLIN AND D [ . ] . % MADEMOISELLE MARS. % CHARLES MATHEWS THE ELDER. $ JOSEPH S. MUNDEN. % MRS. PIOZZI AND CONWAY THE ACTOR. { MRS. ELIZABETH POPE (MISS YOUNG) J HOLCROFT'S "FOLLIES OF A DAY OR TH E MARRIAGE OF FIGARO" ; CHARLES BONNOR. J MISS JANE POPE, T GEORGE RAYMOND. PREFACE TO CHAPTER III 12J CHAPTER THREE: The Clerisy 131 THOMAS TAYLOR, THE PLATONIST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descendants of William Buxton 1
    The Descendants of William Buxton 1 William Buxton1 died in Dec 1625 and was buried on 22 Dec 1625 in Coggeshall, Essex. Basic notes: He worked as a Clothier of Great Coggeshall, Essex. William married Anne.1 They had one son: Thomas. Thomas Buxton1 was born in 1608, died in 1646, and was buried on 3 Jun 1646 in Coggeshall, Essex. Basic notes: He was baptised on 3 Jul 1608 in Coggeshall, Essex. He worked as an Of Great Coggeshall, Essex. Thomas married Susan Sudbury,1 daughter of _____ Sudbury and Unknown,. They had five children: Thomas, Thomas, John, Mary and Martha. Thomas Buxton1 was born in 1643, died on 16 Oct 1713 in Great Coggeshall, Essex, and was buried in Coggeshall, Essex. Basic notes: He was baptised on 19 Oct 1643 in Great Coggeshall, Essex. He worked as an Of Great Coggeshall, Essex. Thomas married Judith Gunton1 in 1668. Judith was born in 1641 and died in 1719. They had two children: Isaac and Thomas. Isaac Buxton1 was born in 1672, died on 26 Dec 1732, and was buried on 30 Dec 1732 in Great Coggeshall, Essex. Basic notes: He worked as an Of Great Coggeshall, Essex. Isaac married Elizabeth Arwaker.1 Elizabeth was born in 1673, died on 11 Dec 1713, and was buried on 15 Dec 1713 in Great Coggeshall, Essex. They had nine children: Thomas, Isaac, John, Charles, William, Judith, Elizabeth, Samuel and Judith. Thomas Buxton1 was born on 6 Aug 1694, died on 5 Feb 1777, and was buried on 11 Feb 1777 in Great Coggeshall, Essex.
    [Show full text]