DOCSLIB.ORG

December 1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ohio Passenger Rail News Ohio to Join Midwest Direct Three Rivers Runs Without Chicago-based hub to include Cleveland, Ohio Stops Cincinnati, Toledo On Nov. 10, Amtrak reintro­ duced its former Broadway Limited A number of Midwest states route across northern Ohio as an banded together last ~mmmer with extension of the New York City­ Amtrak to promote improvements Pittsburgh Three Rivers service. to regional rail passenger services. Trains carrying mail cars, coaches, After months of waiting, Ohio has and a food service car will run daily finally stated its intention to join on an overnight schedule between this collective effort called the Mid­ Chicago and New York. west Rail Initiative, dubbed "Mid­ However, one thing is missing west Direct" by some. Ken Prendergast photo from the new service - Ohio. The effort in many ways imitates PORTENT OF THINGS TO COME? On the morning of Oct. 19, nearly 300 tourists None of three Ohio stations pro­ the Coalition of Northeast Gover­ arrive Cleveland's Lakefront Station on a special Amtrak train. Here, dozens transferred posed for the Three Rivers were from the Amtrak Superliner to a RTA Waterfront Line train to buy gifts and souvenirs at nors' (CONEG) endeavor to secure ready in time for the Nov. 10 start­ Tower City Center. For more details on this train, turn to page 9. federal funds for the Boston-New up of service. Stops in Fostoria, pears ready to put its money where York City high speed rail project, done more talking than doing when .. Akron, and Youngstown were now under construction. it came to its role of improving rail its mouth is. It hasn't been an easy sought by Amtrak, which served For years, Ohio leaders have passenger service. Ohio now ap- -See "MIDWEST", oage eight the Coalition of Northeast Gover­ arrive Cleveland's Lakefront Station on a special Amtrak train. Here, dozens transferred posed for the Three Rivers were J ' from the and souvenirs at ) ' nors' (CONEG) endeavor to secure Amtrak Superliner to a RTA Waterfront Line train to buy gifts ready in time for the Nov. 10 start­ j ' federal funds for the Boston-New Tower City Center. For more details on this train, tum to page 9. up of service. Stops in Fostoria, j ' ) York City high speed rail project, done more talking than doing when .. pears ready to put its money where Akron, and Youngstown were I now under construction. it came to its role of improving rail its mouth is. It hasn't been an easy sought by Amtrak, which served For years, Ohio leaders have passenger service. Ohio now ap- - See "MIDWEST", page eight those cities with its Broadway Lim­ ited until Sept. 1995 when budget This article is reprinted cuts forced the train's elimination. Everyone Deserves a Whistle-stop here with the permission At its Nov. 16 meeting in from the Toledo Herald. By Mike Ferner Westerville, Ohio, OARP's Board PBS documentary, Taken for a "I'm on my way to Chicago. And Columbus just like my grandfather of Directors agreed unanimously to ·\ I'm goin' on a train," President Bill could. Ride. Dayton-area independent send a letter which stresses the Clinton told cheering crowds on a I'd like to ask Clinton why he filmmakers Jim Klein and Martha association's displeasure with the campaign stop outside Columbus supports the notion that America Olson saw their work aired on Three Rivers' lack of service to recently. should be the only industrialized PBS' Point of View series in July. Ohioans. The letter was sent to of­ That train carried the president to nation that refuses to subsidize its They tell the dramatic story of ficials at Amtrak, the Ohio Rail De­ my hometown of Toledo. I'm glad passenger rail system. I'd like to how America's passenger trains velopment Commission, Young­ the president of the United States ask him how many more lives we and streetcars were systematically stown, Akron, and Fostoria-plus came to my city. I'd just like to ask will pay to protect •-•oor" Persian and deliberatelY. destroyed by what state and federal legislators. him: Why can't the rest of us take Gulf oil when Amtrak collapses. we now call the highway lobby. "This association is deeply dis­ a train to our state capital? I doubt I'll get a chance to ask What makes their film so impor­ appointed by the fact that the Three I'm not arguing for a taxpayer's him in person, but, luckily, two fel­ tant, however, is that it goes beyond Rivers runs 373 miles non-stop, be­ right to fly on Air Force One. I just low Ohioans have· helped answer vague conspiracy theories to name tween Nappanee, Ind. and Pitts- want to be able to take a train to those questions in a stunning new - See "RIDE", page four - See "BROADWAY", page six Ohio Association of Railroad Passengers 479 Humiston Drive FIRST CLASS U.S. POSTAGE Bay Village OH 44140-3017 What's Inside~ .. A PAID ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED Cleveland OH > ~Train ofThoughf' Permit # 2470 > 'fe6tival ofStations . > Conrail-lltnerfet · . ' > Light railforColumbusr > Passenfertail on the Web > CardtnaJ -:&lizzard Trip' >·Allltl'at Hl'Vt't CQlwabusl · Two Ohio Passenger Rail News, December 1996 Ohio Passenger Rail News Copyright © 1996, Ohio Association of Railroad Passengers Train of Thought Kenneth Prendergast, Editor from OARP Executive Director Mark Carlson, Production Marilyn Carlson, Distribution Kenneth Prendergast Board of Directors nlike past Train of Thought columns which dealt with just one issue, this U time there's a number of issues on which to comment. Officers * * * * * Mark Carlson President Bill Hutchison Vice-President If you want to see a shining example of how a decrepit train station can be Meg Grey Secretary Tom Allen Treasurer brought back to life, take a trip to Toledo. See the photo spread "Toledo Central Directors Union Plaza Rededicated" in this issue for a glimpse of the terrific job done by the Toledo/Lucas County Port Authority. J. Howard Harding Past-President Jim Dingus 216/330/440 Director The revival of Central Union Plaza includes a spacious, comfortable train sta­ ·Ron Bergen Director At-Large Larry George 419 Director tion and transit bus stop on the ground floor, and various offices on the upper Bill O'Brien Director At-Large Frank Gordnier 513/937 Director floors. The facility is an attractive, functional, and financially self-supporting model Bob Wickens Director At-Large Bill Schuler 614 Director for cities across the nation to emulate. Executive Director ***** I'm sure many of you have heard by now, a bidding war has developed Kenneth Prendergast As among CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads for Conrail. Regardless of who gets Conrail, the merged company will become one of the largest transportation com­ panies in the world. This will have a large impact on Ohio, and on current and future passenger rail services here. Between CSX, NS, and Conrail, they have many duplicate, parallel routes across Ohio. But unlike past mergers around these parts, this one doesn't mean that thou­ sands of miles of rail will be melted down and railroad ties sent to Ohio landscap­ ers. CSX and NS may both end up buying Conrail, then divvy up the lines each wants most. Also, nearly every CSX, NS, and Conrail mainline in Ohio is at ca­ pacity. According to statements by the railroad companies, the merged company will use many of these parallel lines for specialized traffic. Those routes getting the fast freights will likely be where the merged company will accept passenger trains. Neither CSX, NS, nor Conrail have historically shown affection for passenger trains. These three companies have stated that passenger trains should mix with the fast freights or, ultimately, run on passenger-only tracks. In any event, the variables of who gets what _routes and where passengers fit in 'are mind_-boggling in their numb~r. Tijey e:ye <(s countless as the railroad "industry watchers who are burning out crystal balls trying to predict what the rail map in the eastern U.S. will look like five years from now. * * * * * Last year, the Cleveland Indians made it to the World Series. If that wasn't strange enough, this past September Columbus Mayor Greg Lashutka actually had some nice things to say about light rail transit. Has anyone checked the align- w 111 u""' umuy u1 wt:st: paraue1 nnes ror spectallzed tratlic. Those routes getting the fast freights will likely be where the merged company will accept passenger trains. Neither CSX, NS, nor Conrail have historically shown affection for passenger trains. These three companies have stated that passenger trains should mix with the fast freights or, ultimately, run on passenger-only tracks. In any event, the variables of who gets what routes and where passengers fit in 'are min<t-boggling in their numHer. They are as countless as the railroad'industry watchers who are burning out crystal balls trying to predict what the rail map in the eastern U.S. will look like five years from now. * * * * * Last year, the Cleveland Indians made it to the World Series. If that wasn't strange enough, this past September Columbus Mayor Greg Lashutka actually had some nice things to say about light rail transit. Has anyone checked the align­ ment of the planets lately? Mayor Lashutka was quoted in the Columbus Dispatch with some surprisingly favorable comments about light rail's future in the capital city. The mayor's com­ ments were printed as part of a multi-article, multi-page special on Columbus' urban sprawl problems (see article "Columbus sees light rail at tunnel's end" on the next page).
Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its

    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
  • Amtrak Saved from Bankruptcy Marpasks for GAO Trains Regain a Future in an 11Th-Hour Move, the U.S

    Amtrak Saved from Bankruptcy Marpasks for GAO Trains Regain a Future in an 11Th-Hour Move, the U.S

    ' ~§§§(fO~§[fil [Fd§~~ [M]§OD1J8 ·'(l\11ehig~n Ohio • Indiana Issue 128 November 1997 Amtrak saved from bankruptcy MARPasks for GAO Trains regain a future In an 11th-hour move, the U.S. Congress has saved Am­ investigation trak from an almost -certain bankruptcy by passing the Am­ trak reform and reauthorization bill. The measure passed In a letter to U.S. Senator Spen­ both the Senate and House of Representatives without any cer Abraham (R-Michigan), objection. With the clock ticking down to a holiday re­ MARP has asked for a General Ac­ cess, Republicans and Democrats negotiated an agreement counting Office (GAO) investiga­ that drew support from interest groups that were at odds tion and assessment of the effec­ only days earlier. tiveness ofAmtrak's management. Amtrak's access to $2.3 billion in capital investment The request was prompted by the funds, included in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, was fall schedules for the Chicago-De­ tied to passage of the reform bill. The capital funds are troit corridor, which went into ef­ needed to retire old debt and to upgrade aging facilities fect Oct. 26. and rolling stock. Without these, Amtrak was facing the The new schedules are the long­ prospect having to go back to unsympathetic creditors in est in Amtrak's history, and, at six December, which probably would have forced Amtrak to hours (Chicago-Detroit), are even file for bankruptcy. longer than they were in the days of Penn Central. After over $100 mil­ It is quite likely that, if Amtrak had filed for bankruptcy, ., a large portion of the national system would have been lion of track and signal work by the -' linnirl<=>tf>rl to n<=>v off rrPrlitor<:: Tn<:tP<=>rl A rntr<=>k h!'l<:: <::nrl- State of Michigan and Amtrak over - x-~-~..,...----~~~I~-.:t D.l.-.;;;; ~I~ ~··e- prospect having to go_back to unsympathetic creditors in est in Amtrak's history, and, at six December, which probably would have forced Amtrak to hours (Chicago-Detroit), are even file for bankruptcy.
  • Our Great Rivers Vision

    Our Great Rivers Vision

    greatriverschicago.com OUR GREAT RIVERS A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Our Great Rivers: A vision for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers Letter from Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel 4 A report of Great Rivers Chicago, a project of the City of Chicago, Metropolitan Planning Council, Friends of the Chicago River, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning and Ross Barney Architects, through generous Letter from the Great Rivers Chicago team 5 support from ArcelorMittal, The Boeing Company, The Chicago Community Trust, The Richard H. Driehaus Foundation and The Joyce Foundation. Executive summary 6 Published August 2016. Printed in Chicago by Mission Press, Inc. The Vision 8 greatriverschicago.com Inviting 11 Productive 29 PARTNERS Living 45 Vision in action 61 Des Plaines 63 Ashland 65 Collateral Channel 67 Goose Island 69 FUNDERS Riverdale 71 Moving forward 72 Our Great Rivers 75 Glossary 76 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT OUR GREAT RIVERS 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This vision and action agenda for the Chicago, Calumet and Des Plaines rivers was produced by the Metropolitan Planning RESOURCE GROUP METROPOLITAN PLANNING Council (MPC), in close partnership with the City of Chicago Office of the Mayor, Friends of the Chicago River and Chicago COUNCIL STAFF Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Margaret Frisbie, Friends of the Chicago River Brad McConnell, Chicago Dept. of Planning and Co-Chair Development Josh Ellis, Director The Great Rivers Chicago Leadership Commission, more than 100 focus groups and an online survey that Friends of the Chicago River brought people to the Aaron Koch, City of Chicago Office of the Mayor Peter Mulvaney, West Monroe Partners appointed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and a Resource more than 3,800 people responded to.
  • Three Rivers Water Trail Access • Row Boats Or Sculls Points Are Available for Public Use

    Three Rivers Water Trail Access • Row Boats Or Sculls Points Are Available for Public Use

    WHAT IS A WATER TRAIL? Is kayaking strenuous? Water trails are recreational waterways on lakes, rivers or Kayaking can be a great workout, or a relaxing day spent oceans between specific points, containing access points floating or casually paddling on the river. and day-use and camping sites (where appropriate) for the boating public. Water trails emphasize low-impact use and What should I wear? promote resource stewardship. Explore this unique Pennsylvania water trail. Whatever you’re comfortable in! You should not expect to get excessively wet, but non-cotton materials that dry quickly are Three Rivers WHAT TYPES OF PADDLE-CRAFT? best. Consider dressing in layers, and wear shoes that will stay on your feet. • Kayaks • Canoes How do I use the storage racks? • Paddle boards Water Trail The storage racks at many Three Rivers Water Trail access • Row boats or sculls points are available for public use. These are not intended for long term storage. Store “at your own risk.” Using a lock you FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: are comfortable with is recommended. Is it safe for beginners to paddle on the river? Flat-water kayaking, canoeing, or paddle boarding is perfect for beginners. It is easy to learn with just a Map & Guide few minutes of instruction. RUL THREE RIVERS E S & Friends of the Riverfront, founded in 1991, is WATER TRAIL dedicated to the development and stewardship of the Three Rivers Heritage Trail and Three R Developed by Friends of the Riverfront Rivers Water Trail in the Pittsburgh region. This EG PENNSYLVANIA BOATING REGULATIONS guide is provided so that everyone can enjoy the natural amenities that makes the Pittsburgh • A U.S.
  • RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203

    RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203

    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.
  • Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L

    Ms 711 Rg 1 National Railroad Passenger Corporation / Amtrak : James L

    MS 711 RG 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION / AMTRAK : JAMES L. LARSON OPERATIONS AND PLANNING FILES 1971-2003, bulk 1976-2003. 16.5 linear ft. Original order has been maintained. The James L. Larson files are arranged in the following series: 1. REPORTS 2. CHRONOLOGICAL FILES 3. LAWSUITS PROVENANCE Gift of Mrs. Mary Larson (387-2090), 2011. HISTORICAL INFORMATION James Llewellyn Larson was born on March 27, 1935 in Madison, Wisconsin to Ruth (Thurber) and LeRoy Larson. While attending high school, Mr. Larson spent many hours at the Chicago and North Western Railway Company's interlocking tower in Madison, Wisconsin where he learned telegraphy. He went to work for the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific Railroad in 1952 as an agent, telegrapher, and tower operator. In 1953, Mr. Larson began working for the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company as a telegrapher, then as a wire changer. During his 20-year tenure with C&NW, he worked in the Operating Department, was a Train Dispatcher from 1957 to 1959, and then spent eight years as an Assistant Trainmaster and a Trainmaster. He was a System Rules Examiner from 1966 to 1968, an Assistant Division Superintendent from 1968 to 1969, Assistant Superintendent -Transportation from 1969 to 1972, where he managed Operations Center in Chicago. From 1972 to 1973, he was an Assistant Division Master of Transportation on the Twin Cities Division. Mr. Larson was recruited by Amtrak in 1973. During his 25-year tenure with Amtrak he served as Manager of Station Operations, Director of Personnel, Assistant Vice President of Administrative Staff, and Assistant Vice President of Contracts.
  • Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania ROUTE The Great American Rail-Trail route through Pennsylvania connects New York—from the shores of Lake Erie to the confluence of the several existing trails with one trail gap just west of Pittsburgh. Three Rivers in Pittsburgh and on to the Ohio River and Appalachian By connecting the trail through Pittsburgh, the Great American foothills. Rail-Trail also connects to the Industrial Heartland Trails Coalition (IHTC), a vision for a 1,500-mile network of trails that is part of RTC found and reviewed 22 plans in Pennsylvania to better RTC’s TrailNation™ portfolio. The IHTC network will stretch across understand the commonwealth’s trail priorities. A full list of these 51 counties in four states—Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and plans can be found in Appendix A. TABLE 6 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL STATISTICS IN PENNSYLVANIA Total Great American Rail-Trail Existing Trail Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 161.3 (93.8%) Total Great American Rail-Trail Trail Gap Miles in Pa. (% of Total State Mileage) 10.6 (6.2%) Total Trail Gaps in Pa. 1 Total Great American Rail-Trail Miles in Pa. 171.9 TABLE 7 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE THROUGH PENNSYLVANIA Existing Trail or Trail Gap Name Length in Pa. Along Great American Rail-Trail (in Miles) Great Allegheny Passage 124.3 Three Rivers Heritage Trail 3.6 TRAIL GAP 1 – Pittsburgh to Coraopolis 10.6 Montour Trail 17.5 Panhandle Trail 15.9 Total Miles 171.9 Existing Trail Miles 161.3 Trail Gap Miles 10.6 railstotrails.org 23 24 GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT MAP 3: PENNSYLVANIA greatamericanrailtrail.org GREAT AMERICAN RAIL-TRAIL ROUTE ASSESSMENT PENNSYLVANIA Great Allegheny Passage (gaptrail.org) in Pennsylvania GREAT ALLEGHENY PASSAGE The GAP enters Pennsylvania just north of Frostburg, Maryland, and it will continue to host the Great American Rail-Trail through Total Length (in Miles) 150.0 Pennsylvania for 124.3 miles through rolling hills and forestland Total Length Along Great to Pittsburgh.
  • Elegant Report

    Elegant Report

    Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee PENNSYLVANIA STATEWIDE PASSENGER RAIL NEEDS ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2001 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................................................4 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................5 1.1 Study Background........................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Study Purpose...............................................................................................................................................5 1.3 Corridors Identified .....................................................................................................................................6 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................................7 3.0 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ON CANDIDATE CORRIDORS .................................................14 3.1 Existing Intercity Rail Service...................................................................................................................14 3.1.1 Keystone Corridor ................................................................................................................................14
  • Intercity Passenger Rail System

    Intercity Passenger Rail System

    Appendix 3 Intercity Passenger Rail System Introduction passenger rail system, including: The Pennsylvania Intercity Passenger and Freight Rail Plan provides a High-Speed Rail Corridors (110 mph and above) – Corridors under strategic framework for creating a 21st-century rail network. The Plan 500 miles with travel demand, population density, and congestion on visualizes the passenger and competing modes that warrant high-speed rail service. freight rail network in 2035 Regional Corridors (79 to 110 mph) – Corridors under 500 miles, with and offers strategies and frequent, reliable service competing successfully with auto and air objectives to achieve its vision. travel. The purpose of Appendix 3 is Long-Distance Service – Corridors greater than 500 miles that provide to provide background basic connectivity and a balanced national transportation system. information on existing passenger rail service in In a report to Congress, Vision for High-Speed Rail in America, dated April Pennsylvania with a 2009, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provided the following concentration on existing definitions: intercity passenger rail service and performance. High-Speed Rail (HSR) and Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) HSR – Express. Frequent, express service between major population Intercity Rail Definitions centers 200 to 600 miles apart, with few intermediate stops.1 Top There are numerous interpretations of what constitutes “intercity speeds of at least 150 mph on completely grade-separated, dedicated passenger rail.” In a recent publication, Achieving the Vision: Intercity rights-of-way (with the possible exception of some shared track in Passenger Rail, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) urged Congress to enact a National Rail Policy that should address the development of a national intercity 1 Corridor lengths are approximate; slightly shorter or longer intercity services may still help meet strategic goals in a cost-effective manner.
  • Michigan's Railroad History

    Michigan's Railroad History

    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
  • CCLB 12-25-06 a 81 CCLB.Qxd

    CCLB 12-25-06 a 81 CCLB.Qxd

    CCLB 12-25-06 A 81 CCLB 12/5/2006 12:59 PM Page 1 DECEMBER 25-31, 2006 WWW.CRAINSCLEVELAND.COM CRAIN’S CLEVELAND BUSINESS 81 Name of college or university Full-time equivalent Student/ % of enrollment Operating budget Address enrollment faculty Annual tuition undergraduate Type of institution (millions) Endowment Rank Phone/web site Fall 2006 Fall 2005 % change ratio Room & board graduate Affiliation Year founded (millions) President 29 OHIO COLLEGE OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE 311 273 13.9 26:1 24,000 0 4 year NA NA Thomas V. Melillo 10515 Carnegie Ave., Cleveland 44106 NA 100 private 1916 216-231-3300/www.ocpm.edu 30 DEVRY UNIVERSITY ᕡ 186 NA NA 10:1 12,340 62 4 year NA NA Galen H. Graham 6000 Lombardo Center, Seven Hills 44131 NA 38 private 1931 regional vice president 216-328-8754/www.devry.edu 31 ST. MARY SEMINARY & GRAD. SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY 119 117 1.7 11:1 9,000 0 4 year 2.5 39.0 Rev. Thomas W. Tifft 28700 Euclid Ave., Wickliffe 44092 6,650 100 private 1848 440-943-7600/www.stmarysem.edu 32 ASHLAND THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY/CLEVELAND CTR. 100 105 -4.8 NA 8,640 0 3 year NA NA John Schultz 4645 Richmond Road, Warrensville Heights 44128 NA 100 private 1906 216-292-1100/www.ashland.edu/seminary Originally published Oct. 9, 2006 NA=Not available. Enrollment number is for the Fall, 2005 semester. Crain’s Cleveland Business uses staff research and the most current references available to Business lists and the 2006 Book of LIST RESEARCHED BY DEBORAH W.
  • Higbee Building Cleveland, Ohio

    Higbee Building Cleveland, Ohio

    100 PUBLIC SQUARE HIGBEE BUILDING CLEVELAND, OHIO Rico A. Pietro, SIOR Principal 216.525.1473 [email protected] David Leb Sales Associate 216.525.1488 [email protected] 100 PUBLIC SQUARE AREA / NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES • EXCELLENT ACCESS TO ALL MAJOR FREEWAY SYSTEMS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION • GROWING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY • HOME TO ALMOST 3,000 RESIDENTS • 15 HOTELS WITH OVER 3,300 ROOMS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN OR ADJACENT TO THE CBD WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE TO THE FOLLOWING • THE RITZ CARLTON & RENAISSANCE HOTEL • RTA CENTRAL STATION • CANAL BASIN PARK • QUICKEN LOANS ARENA • PROGRESSIVE FIELD • GREATER CLEVELAND AQUARIUM • JACOBS PAVILION AT NAUTICA 100 Public Square is a thirteen (13) story office • JACK CLEVELAND CASINO building built in 1931 to house the Higbee department • PLAYHOUSE SQUARE DISTRICT, HOME TO NUMEROUS ENTERTAINMENT store. The historic 815,000 SF building overlooks the & THEATRE VENUES AND RESTAURANTS newly renovated Public Square. Large windows pro- vide beautiful views of downtown Cleveland and the • RETAIL SHOPS Flats. It features covered and surface parking avail- • WIDE RANGE OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS able for tenants, major fiber optic backbones, easy • ROCK & ROLL HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM access to many restaurants, hotels, banks, shopping, • GREAT LAKES SCIENCE CENTER all public transportation (RTA), direct connectivity to • VOINOVICH PARK the Avenue at Tower City, close proximity to highways • TOWER CITY CENTER and on-site building management. 100 public square • LAKE ERIE was awarded LEED certification at the Gold level in 2010 by the U. S. Green Building Council. 1 2 100 PUBLIC SQUARE BUILD IT SAMPLE FINISHED SPACE The Historic Higbee building offers redevelopment opportunities in the Cleveland Central Business District in YOUR the newly renovated Public Square.