Confronting Expansion Distances of Planetary Nebulae with Gaia DR2 Measurements? D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Confronting Expansion Distances of Planetary Nebulae with Gaia DR2 Measurements? D A&A 625, A137 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935184 Astronomy & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Confronting expansion distances of planetary nebulae with Gaia DR2 measurements? D. Schönberner and M. Steffen Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 31 January 2019 / Accepted 25 March 2019 ABSTRACT Context. Individual distances to planetary nebulae are of the utmost relevance for our understanding of post-asymptotic giant-branch evolution because they allow a precise determination of stellar and nebular properties. Also, objects with individual distances serve as calibrators for the so-called statistical distances based on secondary nebular properties. Aims. With independently known distances, it is possible to check empirically our understanding of the formation and evolution of planetary nebulae as suggested by existing hydrodynamical simulations. Methods. We compared the expansion parallaxes that have recently been determined for a number of planetary nebulae with the trigonometric parallaxes provided by the Gaia Data Release 2. Results. Except for two out of 11 nebulae, we found good agreement between the expansion and the Gaia trigonometric parallaxes without any systematic trend with distance. Therefore, the Gaia measurements also prove that the correction factors necessary to convert proper motions of shocks into Doppler velocities cannot be ignored. Rather, the size of these correction factors and their evolution with time as predicted by 1D hydrodynamical models of planetary nebulae is basically validated. These correction factors are generally greater than unity and are different for the outer shell and the inner bright rim of a planetary nebula. The Gaia measurements also confirm earlier findings that spectroscopic methods often lead to an overestimation of the distance. They also show that even modelling of the entire system of star and nebula by means of sophisticated photoionisation modelling may not always provide reliable results. Conclusions. The Gaia measurements confirm the basic correctness of the present radiation-hydrodynamics models, which predict that both the shell and the rim of a planetary nebula are two independently expanding entities, created and driven by different physical processes, namely thermal pressure (shell) or wind interaction (rim), both of which vary differently with time. Key words. planetary nebulae: general – stars: AGB and post-AGB – stars: distances 1. Introduction techniques and their comparison with evolutionary tracks in the (distant-independent) log g-Teff plane (see e.g. Méndez et al. Individual distances to planetary nebulae (PNe) are of great rel- 1992, and references therein). evance for our understanding of post-asymptotic giant-branch The so-called “gravity distances” of Méndez et al.(1992) (post-AGB) evolution provided they are of sufficient accuracy to and Kudritzki et al.(2006) are based on model atmospheres of allow a trustworthy determination of stellar and nebular proper- different degrees of sophistication: static atmospheres with lim- ties that can be compared with theoretical predictions. Moreover, ited consideration of line blanketing in the former, and “unified” objects with known individual distances serve as calibrators for model atmospheres that also include the wind envelope in the the so-called statistical distances based on secondary nebular latter work. To get the distance, the stellar gravity is combined properties. Prior to the Gaia era, direct trigonometric distances with the stellar mass that is read off from post-AGB tracks in were only available for a rather limited number of close-by PNe a Teff=log g plane, the visual absolute brightness, and the model through long-term measurements of the US Naval Observatory flux for the given Teff (see Eq. (4) in Méndez et al. 1992). (USNO, Harris et al. 2007) and the Hubble Space Telescope The distances of Méndez et al.(1992) and Kudritzki et al. (HST, Benedict et al. 2009). (2006) are based on the old post-AGB evolutionary tracks of Much effort was thus invested in getting individual dis- Schönberner(1979, 1981, 1983). The new evolutionary cal- tances for more distant objects using other methods, for exam- culations of Miller Bertolami(2016) give somewhat higher ple detailed spectroscopic determinations of the central-star post-AGB luminosities (and lower gravities) for a given remnant parameters by non-local thermal equilibrium model-atmosphere mass. In short, the gravity distances are now smaller by about 5%, and these adjusted distances are used here for comparison1. ? This work has made use of data from the European Space Pauldrach et al.(2004) analysed the UV spectra of a number Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/ of PN central stars using a very sophisticated, hydrodynam- gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Con- ically consistent model, which includes the expanding stellar sortium (DPAC, https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/ consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia 1 For more details, the reader is referred to Sect. 5.2 in Schönberner Multilateral Agreement. et al.(2018). Article published by EDP Sciences A137, page 1 of8 A&A 625, A137 (2019) atmosphere with the supersonic wind region. This model, origi- Frew et al.(2016). The agreements are very satisfying: nally developed for mass-losing massive stars, provides the stel- – the USNO parallaxes are confirmed by the Gaia DR2, lar parameters (effective temperature, radius, luminosity, mass) although the USNO errors are comparatively high for objects independently of any stellar evolutionary tracks, and hence also further away than 0.5 kpc. The HST distances slowly deviate the distance. with increasing distance from the 1:1 relation for unknown Another important approach to get an individual distance reasons, until they are about 30% higher at 0.50 pc (cf. Fig. 1 is to model the whole system, central star and nebular enve- in Kimeswenger & Barría 2018). lope, by employing for instance the well-known photoionisation – The comparison with the two statistical distance scales code “Cloudy”2. Since many parameters determine the nebu- reveals only insignificant deviations from the 1:1 relation – lar emission, a consistent solution that also includes the stellar though the individual distance differences can be very high, parameters is rather complex and prone to degeneracy, which up to about a factor of two to either side (cf. Figs. 2 and 3 in must be resolved by additional constraints. An interesting vari- Kimeswenger & Barría 2018). ant is the combination of a full spectroscopic analysis of the The purpose of the present paper is a comparison of the most stellar atmosphere including the stellar wind with a consis- recent expansion distances determined by SBJ with the trigono- tent nebular photoionisation model, as has been performed for metric distances provided by the Gaia DR2. As an aside, we instance by Morisset & Georgiev(2009) for the IC 418 sys- also discuss briefly the quality of spectroscopic (or gravity) tem. These authors also provide an illuminating discussion of methods and/or the use of photoionisation models for distance the degeneracy problem and a possible way to solve it. determinations for the objects in common. A further powerful method of deriving individual distances The paper is organised as follows. Firstly, we present a brief to planetary nebulae is the expansion-parallax method. In the lat- introduction to the method of determining expansion distances est study of this kind (Schönberner et al. 2018, hereafter SBJ), (Sect.2). Then, in Sect.3, we introduce our sample of PNe two- or three-epoch HST images were employed. From these that have expansion and Gaia trigonometric parallaxes and com- images, angular proper motions of for instance the nebular rim pare the distances in detail. In particular, we demonstrate the and shell edges were determined and combined with measured importance of the correction factors. The following Sect.4 deals expansion (Doppler) velocities to derive directly the distances with an empirical determination of individual correction factors, by assuming that the expansions along the line of sight and in both for nebular shell and rim. This article closes with a short the plane of sky are equal. summary and the conclusion (Sect.5). It turned out that the (corrected) expansion distances as derived by SBJ are in general smaller than the distances based on the spectroscopic methods. However, both the gravity and 2. Essence of the expansion method the expansion distances are subject to uncertainties that are dif- We follow here the notation used in SBJ. Approximating the ficult to control. In the case of the former, the distances rely on a main structure of a PN as a system of (spherical) expanding precise determination of the stellar gravity (Méndez et al. 1992, shock waves, the so-called “shell” followed by the “rim” with Eq. (4) therein), which is a difficult task for very hot stars and internal velocity and density gradients (cf. Fig.1), the distance is the main source for the distance uncertainties. usually determined by the relation The situation is even more complicated for the expansion 0 ˙ parallaxes because we are dealing in this case with expanding Dexp = 211 VDoppler = θ; (1) gaseous shells led by shocks. The problem, usually ignored in 0 1 the past, lies in the conversion of pattern expansions (the leading where Dexp is the distance in parsec (pc), VDoppler (in km s− ) is shocks) into flow velocities (Doppler line split). The correc- half the Doppler split of a suitable emission line observed in the tion factor (see Sect.2) to be applied for the distance is always direction to the nebular centre, θ (in milli-arcseconds, or mas) the larger than unity, but its size fully relies on a proper description angle between the centre of the nebula and the feature (or nebu- of the formation and expansion of PNe and their shock fronts.
Recommended publications
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Excitation Classes P for 750 Galactic Planetary Nebulae
    Catalogue of Excitation Classes p for 750 Galactic Planetary Nebulae Name p Name p Name p Name p NeC 40 1 Nee 6072 9 NeC 6881 10 IC 4663 11 NeC 246 12+ Nee 6153 3 NeC 6884 7 IC 4673 10 NeC 650-1 10 Nee 6210 4 NeC 6886 9 IC 4699 9 NeC 1360 12 Nee 6302 10 Nee 6891 4 IC 4732 5 NeC 1501 10 Nee 6309 10 NeC 6894 10 IC 4776 2 NeC 1514 8 NeC 6326 9 Nee 6905 11 IC 4846 3 NeC 1535 8 Nee 6337 11 Nee 7008 11 IC 4997 8 NeC 2022 12 Nee 6369 4 NeC 7009 7 IC 5117 6 NeC 2242 12+ NeC 6439 8 NeC 7026 9 IC 5148-50 6 NeC 2346 9 NeC 6445 10 Nee 7027 11 IC 5217 6 NeC 2371-2 12 Nee 6537 11 Nee 7048 11 Al 1 NeC 2392 10 NeC 6543 5 Nee 7094 12 A2 10 NeC 2438 10 NeC 6563 8 NeC 7139 9 A4 10 NeC 2440 10 NeC 6565 7 NeC 7293 7 A 12 4 NeC 2452 10 NeC 6567 4 Nee 7354 10 A 15 12+ NeC 2610 12 NeC 6572 7 NeC 7662 10 A 20 12+ NeC 2792 11 NeC 6578 2 Ie 289 12 A 21 1 NeC 2818 11 NeC 6620 8 IC 351 10 A 23 4 NeC 2867 9 NeC 6629 5 Ie 418 1 A 24 1 NeC 2899 10 Nee 6644 7 IC 972 10 A 30 12+ NeC 3132 9 NeC 6720 10 IC 1295 10 A 33 11 NeC 3195 9 NeC 6741 9 IC 1297 9 A 35 1 NeC 3211 10 NeC 6751 9 Ie 1454 10 A 36 12+ NeC 3242 9 Nee 6765 10 IC1747 9 A 40 2 NeC 3587 8 NeC 6772 9 IC 2003 10 A 41 1 NeC 3699 9 NeC 6778 9 IC 2149 2 A 43 2 NeC 3918 9 NeC 6781 8 IC 2165 10 A 46 2 NeC 4071 11 NeC 6790 4 IC 2448 9 A 49 4 NeC 4361 12+ NeC 6803 5 IC 2501 3 A 50 10 NeC 5189 10 NeC 6804 12 IC 2553 8 A 51 12 NeC 5307 9 NeC 6807 4 IC 2621 9 A 54 12 NeC 5315 2 NeC 6818 10 Ie 3568 3 A 55 4 NeC 5873 10 NeC 6826 11 Ie 4191 6 A 57 3 NeC 5882 6 NeC 6833 2 Ie 4406 4 A 60 2 NeC 5879 12 NeC 6842 2 IC 4593 6 A
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Menor Was Objects to Slowly Change Over Time
    C h a r t Atlas Charts s O b by j Objects e c t Constellation s Objects by Number 64 Objects by Type 71 Objects by Name 76 Messier Objects 78 Caldwell Objects 81 Orion & Stars by Name 84 Lepus, circa , Brightest Stars 86 1720 , Closest Stars 87 Mythology 88 Bimonthly Sky Charts 92 Meteor Showers 105 Sun, Moon and Planets 106 Observing Considerations 113 Expanded Glossary 115 Th e 88 Constellations, plus 126 Chart Reference BACK PAGE Introduction he night sky was charted by western civilization a few thou - N 1,370 deep sky objects and 360 double stars (two stars—one sands years ago to bring order to the random splatter of stars, often orbits the other) plotted with observing information for T and in the hopes, as a piece of the puzzle, to help “understand” every object. the forces of nature. The stars and their constellations were imbued with N Inclusion of many “famous” celestial objects, even though the beliefs of those times, which have become mythology. they are beyond the reach of a 6 to 8-inch diameter telescope. The oldest known celestial atlas is in the book, Almagest , by N Expanded glossary to define and/or explain terms and Claudius Ptolemy, a Greco-Egyptian with Roman citizenship who lived concepts. in Alexandria from 90 to 160 AD. The Almagest is the earliest surviving astronomical treatise—a 600-page tome. The star charts are in tabular N Black stars on a white background, a preferred format for star form, by constellation, and the locations of the stars are described by charts.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundances of Planetary Nebulae IC 418, IC 2165 and NGC 5882
    A&A 423, 593–605 (2004) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040413 & c ESO 2004 Astrophysics Abundances of Planetary Nebulae IC 418, IC 2165 and NGC 5882 S. R. Pottasch1, J. Bernard-Salas1,2,3,D.A.Beintema1,2,andW.A.Feibelman3 1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Laboratory for Space Research, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands 3 Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, 219 Space Sciences Building, Ithaca, NY-14850-6801, USA 4 Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, Code 681, Goddard Space Flight Center, MD, USA Received 9 March 2004 / Accepted 14 May 2004 Abstract. The ISO and IUE spectra of the elliptical nebulae NGC 5882, IC 418 and IC 2165 are presented. These spectra are combined with the spectra in the visual wavelength region to obtain a complete, extinction corrected, spectrum. The chemical composition of the nebulae is then calculated and compared to previous determinations. A discussion is given of: (1) the recombination line abundances; (2) the exciting stars of the nebulae; and (3) possible evolutionary effects. Key words. ISM: abundances – ISM: planetary nebulae: individual: NGC 5882; IC 418; IC 2165 – infrared: ISM 1. Introduction been discussed in earlier papers (e.g. see Pottasch & Beintema 1999; Pottasch et al. 2000, 2001; Bernard Salas et al. 2001), IC 418, IC 2165 and NGC 5882 are morphologically quite sim- and can be summarized as follows. ilar; they are usually classified as elliptical in shape, and they are located rather far from the galactic plane, which is prob- The most important advantage is that the infrared lines orig- ably an indication that they have been formed from low mass inate from very low energy levels and thus give an abundance stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Field Spectroscopy of Planetary Nebulae with MUSE
    galaxies Article Integral Field Spectroscopy of Planetary Nebulae with MUSE Jeremy R. Walsh 1,* and Ana Monreal-Ibero 2,3 1 European Southern Observatory, 85748 Garching, Germany 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; [email protected] 3 Dpto. Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 February 2020; Accepted: 29 March 2020; Published: 3 April 2020 Abstract: The Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) is a large integral field unit mounted on the ESO Very Large Telescope. Its spatial (60 arcsecond field) and wavelength (4800–9300Å) coverage is well suited to detailed imaging spectroscopy of extended planetary nebulae, such as in the Galaxy. An overview of the capabilities of MUSE applied to Planetary Nebulae (PNe) is provided together with the specific advantages and disadvantages. Some examples of archival MUSE observations of PNe are provided. MUSE datacubes for two targets (NGC 3132 and NGC 7009) are analyzed in detail, and they are used to show the advances achievable for planetary nebula studies. Prospects for further MUSE observations of PNe and a broader analysis of existing datasets are outlined. Keywords: optical spectroscopy; integral field spectroscopy; planetary nebulae; emission lines; physical conditions; abundances; kinematics 1. Overview of MUSE The Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) is a large field-of-view (∼60 × 6000) optical integral field spectrometer mounted on the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT), currently on Unit Telescope 4 (Yepun). The field is divided into 24 slices, and each is sent to a separate integral field unit (IFU) that divides the sub-field into 48 mini slits, which are all fed to one of the 24 identical spectrometers [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Index to JRASC Volumes 61-90 (PDF)
    THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA GENERAL INDEX to the JOURNAL 1967–1996 Volumes 61 to 90 inclusive (including the NATIONAL NEWSLETTER, NATIONAL NEWSLETTER/BULLETIN, and BULLETIN) Compiled by Beverly Miskolczi and David Turner* * Editor of the Journal 1994–2000 Layout and Production by David Lane Published by and Copyright 2002 by The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 136 Dupont Street Toronto, Ontario, M5R 1V2 Canada www.rasc.ca — [email protected] Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................2 Volume Number Reference ...................................................3 Subject Index Reference ........................................................4 Subject Index ..........................................................................7 Author Index ..................................................................... 121 Abstracts of Papers Presented at Annual Meetings of the National Committee for Canada of the I.A.U. (1967–1970) and Canadian Astronomical Society (1971–1996) .......................................................................168 Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Annual General Assembly of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada (1969–1996) ...........................................................207 JRASC Index (1967-1996) Page 1 PREFACE The last cumulative Index to the Journal, published in 1971, was compiled by Ruth J. Northcott and assembled for publication by Helen Sawyer Hogg. It included all articles published in the Journal during the interval 1932–1966, Volumes 26–60. In the intervening years the Journal has undergone a variety of changes. In 1970 the National Newsletter was published along with the Journal, being bound with the regular pages of the Journal. In 1978 the National Newsletter was physically separated but still included with the Journal, and in 1989 it became simply the Newsletter/Bulletin and in 1991 the Bulletin. That continued until the eventual merger of the two publications into the new Journal in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngc Catalogue Ngc Catalogue
    NGC CATALOGUE NGC CATALOGUE 1 NGC CATALOGUE Object # Common Name Type Constellation Magnitude RA Dec NGC 1 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:07:16 27:42:32 NGC 2 - Galaxy Pegasus 14.2 00:07:17 27:40:43 NGC 3 - Galaxy Pisces 13.3 00:07:17 08:18:05 NGC 4 - Galaxy Pisces 15.8 00:07:24 08:22:26 NGC 5 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:07:49 35:21:46 NGC 6 NGC 20 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 7 - Galaxy Sculptor 13.9 00:08:21 -29:54:59 NGC 8 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:08:45 23:50:19 NGC 9 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.5 00:08:54 23:49:04 NGC 10 - Galaxy Sculptor 12.5 00:08:34 -33:51:28 NGC 11 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.7 00:08:42 37:26:53 NGC 12 - Galaxy Pisces 13.1 00:08:45 04:36:44 NGC 13 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.2 00:08:48 33:25:59 NGC 14 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.1 00:08:46 15:48:57 NGC 15 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.8 00:09:02 21:37:30 NGC 16 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:04 27:43:48 NGC 17 NGC 34 Galaxy Cetus 14.4 00:11:07 -12:06:28 NGC 18 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:09:23 27:43:56 NGC 19 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.3 00:10:41 32:58:58 NGC 20 See NGC 6 Galaxy Andromeda 13.1 00:09:33 33:18:32 NGC 21 NGC 29 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 22 - Galaxy Pegasus 13.6 00:09:48 27:49:58 NGC 23 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.0 00:09:53 25:55:26 NGC 24 - Galaxy Sculptor 11.6 00:09:56 -24:57:52 NGC 25 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.0 00:09:59 -57:01:13 NGC 26 - Galaxy Pegasus 12.9 00:10:26 25:49:56 NGC 27 - Galaxy Andromeda 13.5 00:10:33 28:59:49 NGC 28 - Galaxy Phoenix 13.8 00:10:25 -56:59:20 NGC 29 See NGC 21 Galaxy Andromeda 12.7 00:10:47 33:21:07 NGC 30 - Double Star Pegasus - 00:10:51 21:58:39
    [Show full text]
  • Noao Annual Report Fy07
    AURA/NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2007 Submitted to the National Science Foundation September 30, 2007 Revised as Final and Submitted January 30, 2008 Emission nebula NGC6334 (Cat’s Paw Nebula): star-forming region in the constellation Scorpius. This 2007 image was taken using the Mosaic-2 imager on the Blanco 4-meter telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter- American Observatory. Intervening dust in the plane of the Milky Way galaxy reddens the colors of the nebula. Image credit: T.A. Rector/University of Alaska Anchorage, T. Abbott and NOAO/AURA/NSF NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY NOAO ANNUAL REPORT FY 2007 Submitted to the National Science Foundation September 30, 2007 Revised as Final and Submitted January 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITIES AND FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 2 1.1 NOAO Gemini Science Center .............................................................................. 2 GNIRS Infrared Spectroscopy and the Origins of the Peculiar Hydrogen-Deficient Stars...................... 2 Supermassive Black Hole Growth and Chemical Enrichment in the Early Universe.............................. 4 1.2 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO)................................................ 5 The Nearest Stars.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Balmer Decrement in the Emission Spectra of Astronomical Objects
    The Balmer decrement in the emission spectra of astronomical objects Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Bloom, Gary Stuart, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 20:45:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318347 THE BALMER DECREMENT IN THE EMISSION SPECTRA OF ASTRONOMICAL OBJECTS, by Gary Stuart Bloom A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful­ fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED:__ APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: PREFACE Due to the nature of the problem undertaken, namely, comparison of the Balmer decrements In astronomical emission spectra, the details of this thesis were becoming dated even prior to completion of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Field Spectroscopy of Planetary Nebulae with MUSE
    galaxies Article Integral Field Spectroscopy of Planetary Nebulae with MUSE Jeremy R. Walsh1 and Ana Monreal-Ibero2,3 1 Jeremy R. Walsh, European Southern Observatory, 85748 Garching, Germany; [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; [email protected] 3 Universidad de La Laguna, Dpto. Astrofísica, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 February 2020; Accepted: 29 March 2020 Abstract: The Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) is a large integral field unit mounted on the ESO Very Large Telescope. Its spatial (60 arcsecond field) and wavelength (4800-9300Å) coverage is well suited to detailed imaging spectroscopy of extended planetary nebulae, such as in the Galaxy. An overview of the capabilities of MUSE applied to planetary nebulae (PNe) is provided together with the specific advantages and disadvantages. Some examples of archival MUSE observations of PNe are provided. MUSE datacubes for two targets (NGC 3132 and NGC 7009) have been analysed in detail and they are used to show the advances achievable for planetary nebula studies. Prospects for further MUSE observations of PNe and a broader analysis of existing datasets are outlined. Keywords: optical spectroscopy; integral field spectroscopy; planetary nebulae; emission lines; physical conditions; abundances; kinematics. 1. Overview of MUSE The Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) is a large field of view (∼60× 6000) optical integral field spectrometer mounted on the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT), currently on Unit Telescope 4 (Yepun). The field is divided into 24 slices and each is sent to a separate integral field unit (IFU) that divides the sub-field into 48 mini slits which are all fed to one of the 24 identical spectrometers [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Skytools Chart
    33 Dorado - Carina SkyTools 3 / Skyhound.com NGC 2546 ν α - ζ 40° σ α δ Puppis η2 Collinder 173 τ β 2 γ Canopus γ1 1433 NGC 2547 Horologium Pictor γ δ IC 2395 γ NGC 2670 χ α 1566 -5 0° ζ 1553 1549 ο NGC 2669 1672 IC 2391 δ ε α β 1261 Carina NGC 2516 ε Dorado ι α δ 2 γ η 1559 δ 1978 1866 1818 1783 NGC 1955 1805 Reticulum IC 2488 θ 2867 2164 κ ι NGC 1962 Large Magellanic Cloud β δ 2210 PK 278-06.1 Volans NGC 1874 NGC 1965 β NGC 1770 Tarantula Nebula NGC 1876 IC 2501 2031 β γ2 1313 ε -60° 2808 α NGC 3114 ζ Mensa ζ α υ PK 285-09.1 IC 2448 ε 1 β 0 -70° h 3211 h 0 02 8 52° x 34° 6h γ h 0 δ 06h00m00.0s -60°00'00" (Skymark) Globular Cl. Dark Neb. Galaxy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Globule Planetary Open Cl. Nebula 33 Dorado - Carina GALASSIE Sigla Nome Cost. A.R. Dec. Mv. Dim. Tipo Distanza 200/4 80/11,5 20x60 NGC 1313 Ret 03h 18m 15s -66° 29' 51" +9,70 9',5x7',2 SBcd 13,5 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1433 Hor 03h 42m 02s -47° 13' 19" +10,80 6',2x3',6 Sba 43,0 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1549 Dor 04h 15m 45s -55° 35' 32" +10,70 5',0x4',3 E 42,0 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1553 Dor 04h 16m 10s -55° 46' 51" +10,30 6',2x4',1 S0 28,0 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1559 Ret 04h 17m 36s -62° 47' 01" +11,00 4',2x2',1 SBc 34,0 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1566 Dor 04h 20m 04s +54° 56' 16" +10,30 8',1 4',8 34,0 Mly --- --- --- NGC 1672 Dor 04h 45m 43s -59° 14' 51" +10,30 6',6x5',4 Sb 270,0 Mly --- --- --- PGC 17223 Large Magellanic Cloud Dor 05h 23m 35s -69° 45' 22" +0,80 648',0x552',0 SBm 0,2 Mly --- --- --- AMMASSI APERTI Sigla Nome Cost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dunlop Catalogue
    The Dunlop Catalogue www.macastro.org.au Catalogue Numbers Type R.A. Dec. Con. Dun 18 NGC 104 GC 00:24:1 -72:05 Tuc Dun 25 NGC 346 BN 00:59:1 -72:11 Tuc Dun 62 NGC 362 GC 01:03:2 -70:51 Tuc Dun 67 NGC 4372 GC 12:25:8 -72:39 Mus Dun 142 NGC 2070 BN 05:38:6 -69:06 Dor Dun 164 NGC 4833 GC 12:59:6 -70:53 Mus Dun 206 NGC 1313 Gal 03:18:2 -66:30 Ret Dun 225 NGC 6362 GC 17:31:9 -67:03 Ara Dun 230 NGC 1763 BN 04:56:8 -66:25 Dor Dun 252 NGC 5189 PN 13:33:5 -65:59 Mus Dun 255 IC 5250 Gal 22:47:3 -65:03 Tuc Dun 262 NGC 6744 Gal 19:09:8 -63:52 Pav Dun 265 NGC 2808 GC 09:12:0 -64:52 Car Dun 273 NGC 5281 OC 13:43:6 -62:55 Cen Dun 282 NGC 5316 OC 13:53:9 -61:52 Cen Dun 289 NGC 3766 OC 11:36:2 -61:36 Cen Dun 292 NGC 4349 OC 12:24:2 -61:52 Cru Dun 295 NGC 6752 GC 19:10:9 -59:59 Pav Dun 296 NGC 1672 Gal 04:45:7 -59:15 Dor Dun 297 NGC 3114 OC 10:02:5 -60:08 Car Dun 301 NGC 4755 OC 12:53:7 -60:22 Cru Dun 302 NGC 5617 OC 14:29:7 -60:43 Cen Dun 304 NGC 6025 OC 16:03:3 -60:26 TrA Dun 306 NGC 1543 Gal 04:12:8 -57:44 Ret Dun 309 NGC 3372 BN 10:45:1 -59:52 Car Dun 321 NGC 3293 OC 10:35:9 -58:14 Car Dun 322 NGC 3324 BN 10:37:4 -58:37 Car Dun 323 NGC 3532 OC 11:05:8 -58:46 Car Dun 330 IC 2488 OC 09:27:6 -57:00 Vel Dun 331 NGC 1553 Gal 04:16:3 -55:47 Dor Dun 335 NGC 6087 OC 16:18:8 -57:56 Nor Dun 337 NGC 1261 GC 03:12:3 -55:13 Hor Dun 338 NGC 1566 Gal 04:20:0 -54:56 Dor Dun 339 NGC 1617 Gal 04:31:7 -54:36 Dor Dun 342 NGC 5662 OC 14:35:6 -56:37 Cen Dun 348 NGC 1515 Gal 04:04:0 -54:06 Dor Dun 360 NGC 6067 OC 16:13:2 -54:13 Nor
    [Show full text]