DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Low-Carbon Measures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Low-Carbon Measures Assessment of low carbon measures with a bottom-up energy model in the residential and tertiary sector Montenegro April 2014 NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF ATHENS Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 1 The assessment of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary sector of Montenegro with a bottom-up energy model has been compiled by the National Observatory of Athens (NOA), Greece, and Joanneum Research (JR), Austria in the framework of the project Low Carbon South East Europe (LOCSEE) (SEE/D/0166/2.4/X). The LOCSEE project is co-funded by the South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. The Report was developed by a team from the Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development (IERSD), NOA and Joanneum Research: . Dr. Elena Georgopoulou, Senior Researcher and LOCSEE Project Coordinator at NOA . Dr. Sebastian Mirasgedis, Senior Researcher . Dr. Yannis Sarafidis, Senior Researcher . Dimitra Koutentaki, Staff Environmental Scientist . Nikos Gakis, External Assistant to NOA for the LOCSEE project . Dr. Vasso Hontou, External Assistant to NOA for the LOCSEE project . Dr. Daniel Steiner, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Mag. Andreas Tuerk, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Dr. Hannes Schwaiger, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Mag. Claudia Fruhmann . DI Johanna Pucker Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH .............................................................................................. 4 2. STRUCTURE OF THE BOTTOM-UP ENERGY MODEL .................................................................... 5 2.1. ENERGY MODELS .............................................................................................................. 5 2.2. MODULE 1: RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ..................................................................................... 6 2.3. MODULE 2: TERTIARY BUILDINGS .......................................................................................... 9 3. FORMULATION OF THE REFERENCE SCENARIO ........................................................................ 11 3.1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 11 3.2. BASIC INPUT DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................. 11 3.3. GHG EMISSION FACTORS .................................................................................................. 12 3.4. EMISSIONS PROJECTIONS .................................................................................................. 13 4. ASSESSING TECHNICAL POTENTIAL OF GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES ... 17 4.1. GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES ............................................................................... 17 4.2. TECHNICAL POTENTIAL ..................................................................................................... 19 5. ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTION MEASURES ......................... 21 5.1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 21 5.2. ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................. 22 6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF LOW CARBON MEASURES IN RESIDENTIAL AND TERTIARY SECTOR OF MONTENEGRO .................................................................................................... 28 6.1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 28 6.2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ............................................................................................ 28 6.3. ELECTRICITY GENERATION - COUNTRY SPECIFIC GHG EMISSIONS AND LOCAL AIR POLLUTANTS ............ 29 6.4. CALCULATION OF LOCAL AIR POLLUTANTS OF LOW CARBON MEASURES ........................................... 31 6.5. SOCIAL MARGINAL ABATEMENT COSTS OF LOW CARBON MEASURES ............................................... 31 6.6. MACROECONOMIC IMPACTS ............................................................................................... 35 Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 3 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. General Developing, implementing and monitoring low carbon policies and measures is not an easy task as it requires a significant background scientific and technical work in order to collect necessary data, identify mitigation options, develop tools for estimating the GHG emissions abatement potential and selecting the appropriate mix of policies and measures. In order to assist this process, the LOCSEE project (’Low Carbon South East Europe’), funded by the South East Europe (SEE) Transnational Cooperation Programme, was launched in October 2012. A major task of LOCSEE is to develop a methodological framework for assessing the technical and economic GHG emissions abatement potential at sectoral level. The methodology is primarily addressed to SEE countries in the process of joining the EU, but can be applied also by other countries and regions as well. It is based on the long experience of EU Member States in the SEE region which have already developed and implement low carbon policies and measures, and takes into account the real needs, gaps and barriers in the region as communicated by SEE countries during its development. The analysis presented thereafter focuses on residential and tertiary building sector, which is responsible for a large part of GHG emissions of Montenegro. In this context, a bottom-up model for each sub-sector (residential and tertiary) was developed, including all major structural characteristics of the buildings (e.g. energy uses, key technologies, energy sources). The model was first calibrated on the basis of recent energy balances and then utilized for developing a reference scenario for 2030. Next, several mitigation measures were analyzed as regards their GHG emissions abatement potential and their cost-effectiveness. On the basis of the results obtained, a marginal abatement cost curve was constructed in each case, providing quantitative estimations on the technical and economic GHG emissions abatement potential of the sector. 1.2. Methodological approach The applied methodology for the assessment of GHG emissions mitigation measures in residential and tertiary building sector comprises the following steps: . Formulation of the Reference Scenario. The future energy consumption and the relevant GHG emissions of the residential/tertiary sector are estimated for the period 2010-2030 using an energy model. Assessing the expected GHG emissions reduction per measure. The potential low carbon measures are identified based on the current situation analysis (e.g. end-uses with a significant influence on sector’s total emissions of greenhouse gases, technical barriers etc.) and good practices examples implemented in other countries. The future energy consumption and GHG emissions after the implementation of each measure are estimated with proper modifications (e.g. technologies and fuels share, technologies efficiency etc.) in the energy model. The difference between the results of the model for these two scenarios shows the energy savings and the GHG emissions abatement potential that can be achieved with the implementation of this measure. Economic evaluation of measures. Based on the results of the energy model (e.g. technologies share, energy savings per fuel etc.) and market data (e.g. energy Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 4 prices) annual cost and benefits are calculated for each measure. The cost components comprise initial (investment) expenditures and operational / maintenance cost, while the benefit components include potential revenues arising from the operation of the project (such as energy savings in case of energy conservation measures, etc). The cost per unit of CO2eq emission reduction of each measure is then estimated by dividing the net cost (i.e. costs reduced by benefits) with the corresponding GHG emissions reductions, and then marginal abatement cost curves are constructed for residential and tertiary sector respectively. 2. STRUCTURE OF THE BOTTOM-UP ENERGY MODEL 2.1. Energy Models The detailed modeling of energy intensive economic sectors is the initial step for estimating the energy saving and GHG emissions reduction potential of low carbon technologies. In general energy models can be classified into the following 2 categories: . Top-down energy models which describe in detail the interaction between the energy system and the economy. Top-down energy models do not contain technological detail and in general the technology term is represented by aggregated indicators (e.g. elasticities, energy efficiency index). Bottom-up energy models which rely on a detailed technical description of the energy system. These models are used to explicitly calculate energy consumption of end- users for each economic sector based on detailed descriptions of fuel shares and technologies efficiency. Top-down energy models can provide consistent scenarios in terms of economic growth, labor productivity,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report Europe Zone
    Annual report Europe Zone MAA65001 30/04/2011 This report covers the period from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2011. Turkish Red Crescent volunteers receiving refugees from Syria. Photo: TRC In brief Programme outcome The Europe Zone Office is guided in its work with Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies by the principle aims of Strategy 2020 to save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises; enable healthy and safe living; and promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace. The capacity-building efforts are in line with Enabling Action One to build strong National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Programme summary The year of 2011 in the Europe Zone was marked by the ongoing economic crisis and financial instability that has, on the one hand, increased pressure on the humanitarian situation by an increasing vulnerability of the affected populations, and has, on the other hand, led to decreasing funding by the traditional donors. The economic and financial situation is still unclear following the reporting period, and the same issues will continue into the year of 2012 as well. Pressing issues such as demographic changes, the ageing population, climate change and disasters were adding to the difficulties of funding. Special emphasis was put on strengthening domestic fundraising and resource mobilisation capacities of the National Societies through trainings and better communication. A new Federation-wide planning and fundraising tool, the Long Term Planning Framework (LTPF) was introduced in the autumn of 2011, and the first LTPFs have been adopted for the period 2012-2015 both at the Zone level and at the level of the Regional and Country Representations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activities of the Regional Cooperation Council Secretariat
    REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL SECRETARIAT BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL IN LINE WITH ARTICLE 10 OF THE STATUTE OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL This report on the activities of the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC) Secretariat is submitted by the Secretary General of the RCC to the RCC Board in line with Article 10 of the Statute of the RCC. It covers the period 9 September - 30 November 2011. I. Executive Summary The reporting period was characterized by a continuation of the process of undertaking concrete steps in the context of the implementation of the RCC Strategy and Work Programme (SWP) 2011-2013, particularly aimed at the efficient and target-oriented, regionally owned and all- inclusive regional cooperation (Annex I: Report on the implementation of the RCC SWP 2011- 2013 for the period 9 September - 30 November 2011, Annex II: List of events and meetings attended by the RCC Secretary General and the RCC Secretariat officials in the period 9 September - 30 November 2011, Annex IV: List of Abbreviations). The fourteenth RCC Board meeting approved the Report of the RCC Secretary General on the activities of the RCC Secretariat and on the implementation of the RCC SWP 2011-2013, while the sixth Coordination meeting between the South East Cooperation Process (SEECP) Troika, the RCC Secretariat and EU discussed issued related to the cooperation of Serbian SEECP Chair- in-Office (C-i-O) and the RCC Secretariat. With regard to the strategic character of relations between the SEECP and RCC, the RCC Secretary General took active part, upon the invitation of the Serbian SEECP C-i-O, at the Informal Meeting of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the member states of the SEECP, the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative (AII) and the Central European Initiative (CEI).
    [Show full text]
  • EU Candidate and Pre-Accession Countries Economic Quarterly CCEQ. 1/2012
    ISSN: 1830-6392 EU CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES ECONOMIC QUARTERLY CCEQ 1/2012 CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES' ECONOMIC QUARTERLY 1/2012 This paper is published on-line four times a year (January, April, July and September). European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate-General Directorate D – International Economic and Financial Affairs Unit D1 – Candidate and Pre-Candidate Countries KC-AO-12-001-EN-N © European Union, 2012 © European Union, 2012. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Data whose source is not the European Union as identified in tables and charts of this publication, is property of the named third party and therefore authorisation for its reproduction must be sought directly with the source. CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES' ECONOMIC QUARTERLY *************** Contents OVERVIEW..................................................................................................3 CROATIA .....................................................................................................5 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA...............9 ICELAND....................................................................................................13 MONTENEGRO.........................................................................................17 SERBIA .......................................................................................................21 TURKEY .....................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • For Buna/Bojana Area
    Integrat ed Recources Management Plan (I RMP) for Buna/Bojana Area DRAFT (July 2015) 1 List of figures ................................................................................................................................. 5 List of tables .................................................................................................................................. 6 List of boxes .................................................................................................................................. 7 List of Images ................................................................................................................................ 7 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 8 Context ................................................................................................................................ 10 The Integrated Plan Making Process ..................................................................................... 11 How to read the document .................................................................................................. 13 The Approach ...................................................................................................................... 13 PART A: THE PLAN................................................................................................................ 14 1. The foundations of the Plan - Establishing the process ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurial Economy” Faculty for International Economics, Finance and Business UDG University
    Postgraduate Studies “Entrepreneurial Economy” Faculty for International Economics, Finance and Business UDG University Entrepreneurial Economy Podgorica, September 2012 "Entrepreneurial Economy" Volume XVIII “Entrepreneurial economy” Volume XVIII Editor in Chief: Prof. dr Veselin Vukotic Chief Editorial Board: Dr Mladjen Sljivancanin; Dr Danilo Sukovic; Dr Miroslav Prokopijevic; Dr Maja Drakic-Grgur; Dr Milica Vukotic; Dr Igor Luksic Editorial Board: Dr Stojan Dabic; Dr Petar Ivanovic; Dr Zoran Djikanovic; Dr Maja Bacovic; Dr Milorad Katnic; Dr Vlado Kavaric; Dr Jadranka Kaludjerovic; Dr Nina Vujosevic; Dr Zvezdan Vukanovic; Ivana Stesevic, MSci, Jelena Boljevic, MSci; Nikola Perovic, MSci Publisher: Postgraduate Studies »Entrepreneurial Economy«, Faculty for International Economics, Finance and Business, University of Donja Gorica - UDG, Montenegro Technical Editor: Dragan Knezevic Cover Design: Nebojsa Klacar, studio »Arhangel«, Belgrade Director of Postgraduate Studies: Professor Veselin Vukotic, Montenegro President of the Council of Postgraduate Studies: Professor Steve Pejovich, Texas, USA Address: Donja Gorica bb, Podgorica, 81000, Crna Gora Phone/fax: +382 (0)20 410 777 e-mail: [email protected] web: www.udg.edu.me ISSN 2661-2704 Printed edition: 700 copies Printed by: Montcarton, Podgorica "Entrepreneurial Economy" Volume XVIII Introductory remarks Economic journal „Entrepreneurial Economy“ celebrates 10th anniversary of publishing this year. Seventeen volumes, some of which had several issues, have been published from 2002. This is the Volume XVIII. The journal is published by the Foundation „Entrepreneurial Economy“ of the Postgraduate studies „Entrepreneurial Economy“, Faculty for International Economics, Finance and Business, University of Donja Gorica, Montenegro. Demographic trends have been changing the picture of the world in previous centuries. However, projections say that demographic flows will remain strong challenge for contemporary world in following decades, as well.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assessment of the Environment for Women Entrepreneurship In
    ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT FOR WOMEN ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN MONTENEGRO Assessment of the environment for women entrepreneurship in Montenegro Podgorica, September 2013. Title: Assessment of the environment for women entrepreneurship in Montenegro Author: Montenegrin Employers Federation (MEF) Co‐author: IPSOS Strategic Marketing (ISM) Published by: Montenegrin Employers Federation (MEF) IX crnogorske brigade 11 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro T: +382 20 209 250 F: +382 20 209 251 E: upcg@t‐com.me www.poslodavci.org Editor: Zvezdana Oluić Design and print: M.A.S. Code, Podgorica Copies: 200 copies Place and date of publishing: Podgorica, September 2013. Expressions used in this publication make no distinction between female and male gender but imply both genders. Work on this project was made possible with support of the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden. This publication has been published with the support of the (Bureau for Employers` Activities of the) International Labour Organization. The responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the author/co‐author. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) takes no responsibility for the correctness, accuracy or reliability of any of the materials, information or opinions expressed in this report. CONTENT Preface ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgement .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Establishing Cross-Border Cooperation Between Montenegro, Kosovo and Albania: the B P P and Local Ownership
    SLAVICA HELSINGIENSIA 41 ED. BY JOUKO LINDSTEDT & MAX WAHLSTRÖM BALKAN ENCOUNTERS – OLD AND NEW IDENTITIES IN SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE HELSINKI 2012 ISBN 978-952-10-8538-3 (PAPERBACK), ISBN 978-952-10-8539-0 (PDF), ISSN 0780-3281 Tanja Tamminen1 Re-Establishing Cross-Border Cooperation Between Montenegro, Kosovo and Albania: The B P Pk and Local Ownership Introduction In the Western Balkans the current economic crisis is not only affecting the local economies but raises fears that the pace of European Union enlargement will slow down even further. Croatia’s EU membership is due in 2013 and Serbia was given a candidate status in the EU Council meeting of February 2012. Negotiations with Serbia were, however, not opened, and regardless of the Commission’s recommendation the decision on Monte- negro’s accession negotiations was postponed until June 2012. Despite this set-back, Montenegro is well on its way towards the European Union, unlike its neighbours such as Albania and Kosovo. In Albania, the internal political battles have slowed down the necessary reform policies, and the EU road of Kosovo is blocked by the fact that five EU member states do not recognize Kosovo’s independence. Thus Kosovo cannot have any kind of contractual relationship with the EU. The political future of this southern Balkan triangle thus seems quite questionable. The EU membership is nevertheless underlined by the political elites of all three countries as their main foreign policy goal. All countries have declared they will share ‘the common European values’ and have engaged themselves in implementing (more or less actively) the reforms required by the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Ratified by Succession the Convention on Biodiversity on 3 June 2006 And, at the Same Time, Ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety)
    MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY WITH THE ACTION PLAN FOR THE PERIOD 2016 - 2020 Podgorica, December 2015 PREFACE: The Convention on Biological Diversity represents the basic international legal instrument for the protection of global biodiversity accepted by 194 countries. The Convention includes three binding objectives: 1. conservation of biological diversity, 2. sustainable use of its components and 3. fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of generic resources. The Convention requires from "Contracting Parties" to implement various activities aimed at implementation of adopted objectives (including implementation of decisions made at regular conferences of Contracting Parties). One of important mechanisms for the implementation of the Convention is the obligation of Contracting Parties to "... develop national strategies, plans or programmes for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity ..." (Article 6) After regaining its independence, Montenegro ratified by succession the Convention on Biodiversity on 3 June 2006 and, at the same time, ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety). In 2016, Montenegro should become a signatory to the Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (Nagoya Protocol). The Environment Act (Official Gazette of Montenegro 51/08, 21/09, 40/11, 62/13, 06/14), which is the main law governing the protection and conservation of the environment, including, inter alia, the conservation and improvement of biological diversity and limiting and preventing adverse impacts on biological diversity, envisages also the obligation to develop the Biodiversity Strategy with the Action Plan as one of the basic documents for the nature protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Profile of Montenegro
    Migration Profile Country perspective 60 EXTENDED VERSION Montenegro In the framework of MMWD – Making Migration Work for Development, the WP7 activities foresee the launch of a Transnational Platform for Policy Dialogue and Cooperation as an effort to support governments to address the consequence of Demographic trends on SEE territories. In particular, this platform will involve policy makers and decision makers at the national and sub-national level to promote the adoption of more effective services and regulations of the migration flows across the SEE area. In order to support and stimulate the dialogue within the Platform ad hoc migration profiles (MPs) will be developed for each partner country and will integrate the information and knowledge already provided by Demographic projections and Policy scenarios. The current MP focuses on the case of Montenegro and it’s centred around five topics: resident foreign population by gender, age cohorts and citizenship; population flows (internal migration, emigration, immigration); immigrants presence in the national labour market; foreign population by level of educational attainment; remittances/transfers of money to country of origin. These topics have been selected among the MMWD panel of indicators relevant to describe demographic and migration trends as well as 1. Resident foreign population by to map their socio-economic implications. gender, age cohorts and citizenship Background Information on Montenegro In 2011 the National Census of population, households and housing reported 28.258 foreign citizens of which Capital: Podgorica 16.016 females (56,7%) and 12.242 males and (43,3%). However, at that date 12.264 persons were waiting Official language: Montenegrin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second National Communication on Climate Change
    MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM Empowered lives. Resilient nations. THE SECOND NATIONAL COMMUNICATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE February 2015 THE SECOND NATIONAL COMMUNICATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE MONTENEGRO Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM THE SECOND NATIONAL COMMUNICATION ON CLIMATE CHANGE OF MONTENEGRO TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) The Second National Communication on Climate Change was prepared as a joint project by the Government of Montenegro and the Centre for Sustainable Development, Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Montenegro, and was funded by the Global Environment Fund (GEF). Project Team Coordinators: The Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism: Milena Spičanović The Centre for Sustainable Development, UNDP Montenegro: Snežana Marstijepović, Viktor Subotić, Snežana Dragojević Editor: Nebojša Jablan, UNDP Consultant TEAM OF AUTHORS NATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES Snežana Marstijepović, MSc, (Biology), Centre for Sustainable Development, UNDP Montenegro INVENTORY OF GREENHOUSE GASES Irena Tadić, Engineer in Inorganic Technology, Environmental Protection Agency of Montenegro Ivana Bulatović, Biologist, Environmental Protection Agency of Montenegro Duško Mrdak, Teacher of History and Geography, Environmental Protection Agency of Montenegro POLICIES, MEASURES AND ESTIMATES FOR THE REDUCTION OF EMISSIONS Nebojša Jablan, Engineer, UNDP Consultant Anton Ljucović, Electrical Engineer,
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: the Economic Value of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Technical Report Lucy Emerton September 2013
    GEF/UNDP PIMS 5024: National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Montenegro Montenegro: the economic value of biodiversity and ecosystem services Technical Report Lucy Emerton September 2013 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION: scope and content of the report ......................................................................... 1 Background to the assignment ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Aims and scope of the report ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT: economic valuation and biodiversity planning .................................. 2 Valuation and the CBD .................................................................................................................................................. 2 The status of biodiversity valuation in Montenegro ..................................................................................................... 3 3 IDENTIFYING & ASSESSING ECONOMIC LINKAGES: how economic activities depend and impact on biodiversity and ecosystem services .......................................................................................... 4 Categorising and describing ecosystem services ........................................................................................................... 4 Economic linkages and indicators
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report Period: 1 January - 31 December 2011
    Activity Report Period: 1 January - 31 December 2011 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL: EXTERNAL POLICIES AUTHORISING OFFICER BY L. MARCO AGUIRIANO NALDA DELEGATION: TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. BUDGETARY TABLE...................................................................................................................2 1. Objectives 2011............................................................................................................................3 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES ....................................3 1.2. EVALUATION OF THE FEASIBILITY AND THE ASSOCIATED RISKS ..................................................3 2. Evaluation of Results and Resources Used.................................................................................4 2.1. ENVIRONMENT OF DG EXTERNAL POLICIES..............................................................................4 2.2 HUMAN RESOURCES IN THE DG.................................................................................................4 2.3. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET IN 2011 ...............................................................................4 2.3.1 FINAL APPROPRIATIONS ON 31 DECEMBER 2011 AND INITIAL APPROPRIATIONS .......................5 2.3.2 FINAL APPROPRIATIONS ON 31 DECEMBER 2011 AND COMMITTED APPROPRIATIONS................5 2.3.3 COMMITTED APPROPRIATIONS AND EXECUTED PAYMENTS .......................................................7 2.3.4 USE OF THE APPROPRIATIONS CARRIED OVER FROM 2010 TO 2011.........................................7
    [Show full text]