DOCSLIB.ORG

Izvjestaj YIHR 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Izvjestaj YIHR 2012 članica Građanske alijanse Program: Monitoring of Human Rights in Montenegro HUMAN RIGHTS IN MONTENEGRO - 2011 Podgorica, January 2012 Monitoring programme and human rights protection programme implemented by YIHR MNE with the assistance and cooperation of The Balkan Trust for Democracy Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Montenegro January 2012 Publisher Boris Raonić Editor Milan Radović Project cooperators Ajša Hadžibegović Boris Raonić Edin Koljenović Edina Hasanaga Čobaj Mirko Kalezić Proofreading Jelena Ristović Translation Jelena Ristović Design Aleksandar Pajević Print AP print, Podgorica 400 copies Opinions presented in the report do not necessarily represent opinions and standpoints of BTD. CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији Централна народна библиотека Црне Горе, Цетиње ISBN 978-9940-608-00-2 COBISS.CG-ID 19552528 2 CONTENT I Previous information ........................................................................................ 5 II Institutional framework in the area of human rights .................................... 7 III Facing past ..................................................................................................... 17 IV Torture, inhuman and degrading treatment .............................................. 25 V Politically motivated violence ....................................................................... 55 VI Right to fair trial............................................................................................ 65 VII Freedom of expression, peaceful gathering and associating ................... 69 VIII Protection of personal data ....................................................................... 85 IX Religious freedoms ....................................................................................... 91 X Discrimination .............................................................................................. 101 XI Rights of children ........................................................................................ 125 XII Minority rights ........................................................................................... 133 XIII Displaced and internally displaced persons .......................................... 139 XIV Economic and social rights ...................................................................... 143 XV Reports on the state of human rights ....................................................... 151 XVI Conclusions and recommendations ....................................................... 155 3 4 I Previous information Youth Initiative for Human Rights (YIHR), member of Civic Alliance (CA) monitors respect of human rights in Montenegro sixth year in a row, and informs public about the findings via annual and quarterly reports. Previous reports may be found at our web site www.yihr.me This Report includes human rights areas we have identified through work as the most concerning and the areas are as follows: facing past, torture, politically motivated violence, right to fair trial, freedom of expression, gathering and associating, protection of personal data, religious freedom, discrimination, rights of children, minority rights, status of displaced and economic and social rights. Researching and writing of the Report worked six members team of CA with the support of Balkan Trust for Democracy (BTD). In preparation of the Report, we used the techniques of researching on the terrain, press clipping, legal analysis, interviews, SOS phone line, and official reports of public institutions. Information provided in the Report were collected from 1 January to 31 December 2011. GA is grateful to all cooperators at the project, Center for children rights from Podgorica, CAZAS, UNHCR, and numerous individuals. The most important political event in 2011 happened on 9 December 2011, when Montenegro received conditional date for the beginning of negotiations with the European Union on the accession. Montenegro shall open negotiations in June 2012, if the country continues to achieve results in the fight against corruption and organized crime. According to the data which are not final, because at the time of receiving data European Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg prepared annual report on work of courts, the Court received from Montenegro 920 applications. Out of this number, 30 applications were processed in the phase of main trial. Almost 300 applications were rejected because they were groundless and for other reasons. Until the end of 2011, eight verdicts were rendered and they defined violation of at least one convention right. Mostly established were violations of right to fair trial in reasonable time, one area each in lack of execution of court verdict, right to the access to court, use of property, right to private and family life, and two cases of violation of right to freedom of expression. According to the number of applications, in comparison with the 5 Logo „ Free as a man “ number of citizens, Montenegro is in line with the countries whose citizens delivered the most applications. At the margins of General Assembly of United Nations, on 23 September 2011, was presented International logo of human rights. Logo was elected at the international competition by the votes of experts and citizens, after the five months procedure. At the competition arrived more than 15.000 proposals from more than 190 countries. Author of the winning logo “Free as a man” was Predrag Stakić , designer from Belgrade. 6 II Institutional framework in the area of human rights a. Constitutional court of Montenegro According to the Constitution of Montenegro from 2007, the Constitutional court shall, among others, decide on harmonization of law with the Constitution and defined and published International Treaties, and on constitutional complaint due to the violation of human rights and freedoms, guaranteed by the Constitution, after use of all legal means. The Constitutional court has seven judges. The court informed the CA researcher that Constitutional court received large numbers of constitutional complaints therefore, as the report on work was not done at the time of collecting data for this report, the court did not have precise data. Public often criticize the work of Constitutional court, stating it was inefficient and non-transparent. In the case Koprivica against Montenegro, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, confirmed that. Although the country considered that all legal means were not used in national judiciary, or that the complaint was not sent to Constitutional court, in explanation of adopting complaint the Court stated that Constitutional court in previous period did not show efficiency and transparency important for considering the complaint efficient and effective legal remedy. Then, until 31 July 2011, when the complaint arrived at the Court in Strasbourg not any verdict of Constitutional court had been rendered, or presented to public. Similar case was registered in 2010, but even after this, large number of verdicts was not presented to public. This decision of Court in Strasbourg opened the window for ignoring the Constitutional court as the legal remedy and in other cases of human rights violation, unless efficiently and transparency of its work significantly changes. The Report developed by NGO Human Rights Action (HRA) also stated that constitutional complaint in Montenegro was not efficient legal remedy. The Report also stated that the Constitutional court had the power to react only in the case of human rights violations which was in the concrete case committed, while the court may not protect human rights in cases when they have been violated by omission, 7 failure to adopt an act or when rights have been violated by some factual 1 action. The budget of the Constitutional court for 2012 is 692,353.74 EUR. b. Ministry for human and minority rights Work of the Ministry for human and minority rights has been organized through the Sector for promotion and protection of rights of minority population and other minority national communities and Sector for improvement and protection of human rights. Within the Ministry function Department for gender equality affairs and Department for improvement and 2 protection of rights of Roma, Askhelia and Egyptians. The Government announced establishing of the sector that would deal with religious issues. The Ministry has 12 employees but the systematization prescribed 27 servants. According to CA findings, small number of servants speaks English language. Media published that Ferhat Dinoša, Minister for human and minority rights shall resign, which continuously required almost whole NGO sector, due to his homophobic statements during 2010. Minister Dinoša did not resign but was appointed for the Ambassador in Albania. During 2011, the Ministry conducted media antidiscrimination campaign. The campaign included various types of media and messages were transmitted through billboards, leaflets, and advertisement in daily newspaper and videos. On TV Teuta from Ulcinj, videos were broadcasted on Albanian language. The Ministry organized workshops on which civil servants were educated on antidiscrimination legislation. The training covered employees in judiciary, police, inspection bodies and other institutions. On 7 July 2011, the Government of Montenegro adopted the Information on representation of minority population and other minority national communities in public services, public authorities, and local self-government, which has been developed by the Ministry according
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Rights in Montenegro
    MONTENEGRO Program: Monitoring of Human Rights in Montenegro Human Rights in Montenegro - 2010 Podgorica, February 2011 Monitoring programme and human rights protection programme implemented by YIHR MNE with the assistance and cooperation of Civil rights defenders Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Montenegro February 2011 Publisher Boris Raonić Authors Boris Raonić Milan Radović Edina Hasanaga Čobaj Marija Vujović Dejan Minić Denis Zvrko Proofreading Jelena Vukoslavović Ristović Translation Jelena Vukoslavović Ristović Design Nikola Milenković Print AP print, Podgorica 400 copies CONTENT I Previous information ...........................................................................................5 II Legislation and institutional framework of protection in human rights area .......7 III Facing past ......................................................................................................15 IV Torture ............................................................................................................21 V Politically motivated violence ............................................................................41 VI Free legal aid ...................................................................................................49 VII Freedom of expression ....................................................................................55 VIII Religious freedom .........................................................................................65 IX Discrimination ................................................................................................69
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Europe Zone
    Annual report Europe Zone MAA65001 30/04/2011 This report covers the period from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2011. Turkish Red Crescent volunteers receiving refugees from Syria. Photo: TRC In brief Programme outcome The Europe Zone Office is guided in its work with Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies by the principle aims of Strategy 2020 to save lives, protect livelihoods, and strengthen recovery from disasters and crises; enable healthy and safe living; and promote social inclusion and a culture of non-violence and peace. The capacity-building efforts are in line with Enabling Action One to build strong National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Programme summary The year of 2011 in the Europe Zone was marked by the ongoing economic crisis and financial instability that has, on the one hand, increased pressure on the humanitarian situation by an increasing vulnerability of the affected populations, and has, on the other hand, led to decreasing funding by the traditional donors. The economic and financial situation is still unclear following the reporting period, and the same issues will continue into the year of 2012 as well. Pressing issues such as demographic changes, the ageing population, climate change and disasters were adding to the difficulties of funding. Special emphasis was put on strengthening domestic fundraising and resource mobilisation capacities of the National Societies through trainings and better communication. A new Federation-wide planning and fundraising tool, the Long Term Planning Framework (LTPF) was introduced in the autumn of 2011, and the first LTPFs have been adopted for the period 2012-2015 both at the Zone level and at the level of the Regional and Country Representations.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro: IREX Media Sustainability Index 2017
    Journalism remains a battleground, with deep divisions rooted in commercial and political problems. Few of Montenegro’s 73 media outlets distance themselves from political polarization. MONTENEGRO ii MEDIA SUSTAINABILITY INDEX 2017 introduction OVERALL SCORE: 2.04 MONTENEGRO In 2016, Montenegro was marked by political instability, a government crisis, and a parliamentary election. Economic growth at 3 percent was promising but high public debt and 19 percent unemployment still dog the country’s recovery. The European Union (EU) and NATO accession process continue to unfold: Montenegro has opened 24 out of the 35 Accession INegotiation Chapters required for admission to the EU and it is quite realistic to expect that next year Montenegro will be the 29th NATO member-state. While two-thirds of citizens support accession to the EU and a narrow majority also in favor of joining NATO, Serbian nationalists, bolstered by strong Russian support, oppose the process along with the influential Serbian Orthodox Church. Conflict within the ruling coalition, between the dominant political party (the Democratic Party of Socialists, or DPS) and its long-standing ally (the Socialist Democratic Party) resulted in an election on October 16. The DPS won again and, with allies from minority parties, the ruling bloc won 42 seats, while the opposition got 39. The election boasted a 73-percent voter turnout but also saw the arrest of 20 Serbian nationals. They were suspected of preparing a post-election terrorist attack in Montenegrin capital of Podgorica, abetted by two Russian nationals. Subsequently, the opposition still has not conceded the election, although a majority of local electoral observers and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said that the election was fair, democratic, and free.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Low-Carbon Measures
    Assessment of low carbon measures with a bottom-up energy model in the residential and tertiary sector Montenegro April 2014 NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF ATHENS Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 1 The assessment of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary sector of Montenegro with a bottom-up energy model has been compiled by the National Observatory of Athens (NOA), Greece, and Joanneum Research (JR), Austria in the framework of the project Low Carbon South East Europe (LOCSEE) (SEE/D/0166/2.4/X). The LOCSEE project is co-funded by the South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme. The Report was developed by a team from the Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable Development (IERSD), NOA and Joanneum Research: . Dr. Elena Georgopoulou, Senior Researcher and LOCSEE Project Coordinator at NOA . Dr. Sebastian Mirasgedis, Senior Researcher . Dr. Yannis Sarafidis, Senior Researcher . Dimitra Koutentaki, Staff Environmental Scientist . Nikos Gakis, External Assistant to NOA for the LOCSEE project . Dr. Vasso Hontou, External Assistant to NOA for the LOCSEE project . Dr. Daniel Steiner, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Mag. Andreas Tuerk, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Dr. Hannes Schwaiger, JOANNEUM RESEARCH . Mag. Claudia Fruhmann . DI Johanna Pucker Modelling of low carbon measures in residential and tertiary buildings: Montenegro 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Activities of the Regional Cooperation Council Secretariat
    REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL SECRETARIAT BY THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL IN LINE WITH ARTICLE 10 OF THE STATUTE OF THE REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL This report on the activities of the Regional Cooperation Council (RCC) Secretariat is submitted by the Secretary General of the RCC to the RCC Board in line with Article 10 of the Statute of the RCC. It covers the period 9 September - 30 November 2011. I. Executive Summary The reporting period was characterized by a continuation of the process of undertaking concrete steps in the context of the implementation of the RCC Strategy and Work Programme (SWP) 2011-2013, particularly aimed at the efficient and target-oriented, regionally owned and all- inclusive regional cooperation (Annex I: Report on the implementation of the RCC SWP 2011- 2013 for the period 9 September - 30 November 2011, Annex II: List of events and meetings attended by the RCC Secretary General and the RCC Secretariat officials in the period 9 September - 30 November 2011, Annex IV: List of Abbreviations). The fourteenth RCC Board meeting approved the Report of the RCC Secretary General on the activities of the RCC Secretariat and on the implementation of the RCC SWP 2011-2013, while the sixth Coordination meeting between the South East Cooperation Process (SEECP) Troika, the RCC Secretariat and EU discussed issued related to the cooperation of Serbian SEECP Chair- in-Office (C-i-O) and the RCC Secretariat. With regard to the strategic character of relations between the SEECP and RCC, the RCC Secretary General took active part, upon the invitation of the Serbian SEECP C-i-O, at the Informal Meeting of the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the member states of the SEECP, the Adriatic-Ionian Initiative (AII) and the Central European Initiative (CEI).
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Montenegro R01761
    Date Printed: 11/03/2008 JTS Box Number: IFES 8 Tab Number: 11 Document Title: Republic of Montenegro: Voter Awareness Assessment Legal Review, Nov 1997-Feb Document Date: 1998 Document Country: Montenegro IFES ID: R01761 A L o F \ o REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997 - FEBRUARY 1998 PREPARED By: CATHERINE BARNES, PROJECT TEAM LEADER ALEXANDRA LEV ADITIS, PROGRAM ASSISTANT DANIEL FINN, LEGAL ADVISOR IFES ~ International Foundation for Election Systems 1l0115th Street, NW, Third Floor Washington, DC 20005 This Report was made possible by a grant/rom the United States Agency for International Development (USA/D). The opinions expressed in this Report are solely of the International Foundation/or Election Systems (IFES). This material is in the public domain and may be reproduced wilhout permission, citation is appreciated. REpUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT LEGAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 1997-FEBRUARY 1998 ISBN 1-879720-48-5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................•................................................... :.................................................... 1 VOTER AWARENESS ASSESSMENT I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................5 A. MISSION BACKGROUND .......................................................................................5 B. MISSION OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................5 C. SCOPE OF MISSION ...............................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Bureau of the Congress Verification of New Members
    The Bureau of the Congress CG/BUR18(2018)131 19 March 2018 Verification of new members’ credentials Co-rapporteurs:2 Michail ANGELOPOULOS, Greece (L, EPP/CCE) Eunice CAMPBELL-CLARK, United Kingdom (R, SOC) Preliminary draft resolution .......................................................................................................................... 2 Summary The rapporteurs review the credentials of the new members in the light of the current criteria of the Congress Charter and Rules and Procedures. Document submitted for approval to the Bureau of the Congress on 26 March 2018 1 This document is classified confidential until it has been examined by the Bureau of the Congress. 2 L: Chamber of Local Authorities / R: Chamber of Regions EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group in the Congress SOC: Socialist Group ILDG: Independent and Liberal Democrat Group ECR: European Conservatives and Reformists Group NR: Members not belonging to a political group of the Congress Tel ► +33 (0)3 8841 2110 Fax ► +33 (0)3 8841 2719 [email protected] CG/BUR18(2018)13 PRELIMINARY DRAFT RESOLUTION 1. In compliance with the Congress’ Charter and Rules and Procedures, the countries listed hereafter have changed the composition of their delegation due to either the loss of mandate or the resignation of some members of the delegation: Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Georgia, Ireland, Latvia, Montenegro, Norway, Romania, Spain, Sweden, “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, United Kingdom. 2. At present there are 5 representative seats and 11 substitute seats vacant out of a total of 648 seats. The countries concerned – Germany, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, France, Italy, Poland and Romania – are invited to complete their delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorezone Functionality Skadar/Shkodra Lake Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in South-Eastern Europe
    , Shorezone Functionality Skadar/Shkodra Lake Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in South-Eastern Europe Shorezone Functionality Skadar/Shkodra Lake Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in South-Eastern Europe Shorezone Functionality – Skadar/Shkodra Lake Acknowledgements The present report is the result of transboundary collaboration of experts from Albania, Macedonia and Montenegro. The experts are acknowledged for both their professionalism and spirit of cooperation. Special thanks to Ralf Peveling and Holger Densky for their encouragement and significant feedback, and to the National Coordinators of CSBL, Alkida Prodani, Jelena ²° and Nikoleta Bogatinovska who provided constant support during project implementation. Many thanks also to Mihallaq S. Qirjo, Vasil Male and Olsi Duma from Prespa National Park, Kosta Trajce and Arjan Cinari from the Fisheries Management Organization (FMO) of Prespa and Shkodra, respectively, and Vladimir Sjekloca from the National Park of Skadar Lake for their assistance during data collection Barbara Zennaro, Key Expert Disclaimer The views and management recommendations expressed in the present report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of GIZ, the Governments of Albania, Macedonia and Montenegro, nor the national competent authorities in charge of implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. The use of particular designations of hydrogeomorphological areas does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the GIZ, as to the legal status of such water bodies,
    [Show full text]
  • EU Candidate and Pre-Accession Countries Economic Quarterly CCEQ. 1/2012
    ISSN: 1830-6392 EU CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES ECONOMIC QUARTERLY CCEQ 1/2012 CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES' ECONOMIC QUARTERLY 1/2012 This paper is published on-line four times a year (January, April, July and September). European Commission, Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate-General Directorate D – International Economic and Financial Affairs Unit D1 – Candidate and Pre-Candidate Countries KC-AO-12-001-EN-N © European Union, 2012 © European Union, 2012. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Data whose source is not the European Union as identified in tables and charts of this publication, is property of the named third party and therefore authorisation for its reproduction must be sought directly with the source. CANDIDATE AND PRE-ACCESSION COUNTRIES' ECONOMIC QUARTERLY *************** Contents OVERVIEW..................................................................................................3 CROATIA .....................................................................................................5 THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA...............9 ICELAND....................................................................................................13 MONTENEGRO.........................................................................................17 SERBIA .......................................................................................................21 TURKEY .....................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Vodacom Newsletter No 27/July - September 2016
    Vodacom Newsletter No 27/July - September 2016 • Inauguration ceremony for the WWTP for Kotor and Tivat • Signed Contract with Hydrophil GmbH in Ulcinj • PU "Water and Sewerage" Ulcinj Opened its Customer Center • Status of Phase III in Bar, Herceg Novi, and Tivat • Visit of KfW mission to Montenegro • On-Site-Visit to Future Construction Sites in Tivat and Kotor, Phase V- Component 1 • Ecological Curiosities Newsletter No 27 July – September 2016 Inauguration ceremony for the WWTP for Kotor and Tivat On 7th of July 2016 there was inauguration ceremony for the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for Kotor and Tivat in the place Klacina, settlement Obala Djurasevica in Tivat. The invitees and media representatives have been addressed by the Mr. Branimir Gvozdenovic, Minister of Sustainable Development and Tourism in the Government of Montenegro, Mr. Roland Siller, Member of the Management Committee of KfW, Ms. Snezana Matijevic, Mayor of Tivat, Mr. Aleksandar Stjepcevic, Mayor of Kotor, and Mr. Franz Mittermayer, Managing Director of WTE Wassertechnik GmbH. The Contractor is WTE Wassertechnik (Germany), while the Engineer is GkW Consult (Germany). The future WWTP for Kotor and Tivat will have capacity for 72.000 PE. The Project value is Euro 10,247 million. Funding is provided by KfW loan of which 58% should be repaid by the Municipality of Tivat and42% by the Municipality of Kotor. Newsletter No 27 July – September 2016 Signed Contract with Hydrophil GmbH in Ulcinj In Ulcinj is 03 August 2016, signed a Contract with the first-ranked company Hydrophil GmbH on the tender for the selection of the consultantt for the implementation of investment measures project was signed on 03rd of August 2016 in Ulcinj.
    [Show full text]
  • Idrugih MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA " .2^
    CRNA QORA SW1P§TINA CRNE GORE PRIMUENO: 20 GOD. KLASIFIKACIONI BROJ: IPO' VEZA: XJiVI Grna Gora VLADA CRNE GORE Primljeno; Broj; 07-1285 Org. JecJ. Podgorica. 16. aprila 2018. PREDSJEDNIKU SKUPSTINE GRNE GORE PODGORICA Vlada Grne Gore, na sjednici dd 29. marta 2018. godine, ds^jjla ie 1ZVJE§TAJ ORAZVOJU IZASTITI PRAVA ""ANJINSKIH NARQDA i DRUGIH MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA ".2^- kojl Vam u prilogu dbstavljaroo radi stavljanja u procedur.u Skupstine Grne Gore. Za predstavnike Vlade koji 6e uGestvovatI uradu ;Skupstin? injenih radnih tijela, prillkom razmatranja ovog is'Jestaja, odreden: su MEHWED ZENKA, ministar za ijudska i manjmska prava ' LEa GJOKAJ geheraini direktor Direktorata za unapredenja i zastitu prava manjinskih naroda i drugih manjinsklh nacionalmh zajednica ,u Minlstarstvu za Ijudska i manjinska prava. PREDSJEDNIK Dusko Markovid, s, r. I CRNA GORA Ministarstvo za ljudska i manjinska prava IZVJESTAJ 0 RAZVOJUIZASTITI PRAVA MANJINSKIH NARODA IDRUGIH MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA U 2017. GODINI Podgorica, mart2018. godine ir IzvjeStaj 0 razvoju i zaStitiprava manjinskih naroda i drugih manjinskih nacionalnih zajednica u 2017. godini SADR2aJ: UVOD 4 IZVJESTAJ 0 RAZVOJU IZA5TITI prava manjinskih naroda I DRUGIH MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA U 2017. GODINI 5 1.PRAVNIOKVIR ZAStITE MANJINSKIH NARODA I DRUGIH MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA U CRNOJ GORI 6 2.INSTITUCIONALNI OKVIR ZASTITE MANJINSKIH NARODA I DRUGIH MANJINSKIH NACIONALNIH ZAJEDNICA - 9 2.1. MINISTARSTVO ZA LJUDSKA1 MANJINSKA PRAVA 9 2.1.1. DIrektoraCza unapredenje i zaStitu prava manjinskih naroda i drugih manjinskih za}ednlca.........H..~..........M.....10 2.1.2.Zakon o izmjenama I dopunama Zakona o manjinskimpravima islobodama ..11 2.13. Predlog Zakona o izboru, upotrebi ijavnom Isticanju nacionalnih simbola 13 2.1.4.Informaclja o zastupljenosti manjina u Centru za socijalnl rad.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Trip Brochure
    EMAIL: [email protected] Call us: 0038269123456 Wild Montenegro- Jeep Safari Jeep Safari One-Day Tour 1: „Between Two Magical Shores“ • Holiday type - Jeep Safari • Duration - cca. 10 h (depending on the group) • Locations - Virpazar, Skadar Lake, Ada Bojana • Group size - min 3 participants • Start & End Point of tour - Podgorica • Availability - All year round BOOK NOW From: 100 € Bank transfer Hipotekarna banka AD Podgorica IBAN - ME25520042000000735466 SWIFT - ABANSI2 -Please note that the payment must be made in Euros (€) and any charges are to be paid by the client. ______________________________________________________________________________ www.wildmontenegro.me Page | 1 EMAIL: [email protected] Call us: 0038269123456 Overview Skadarska Krajina is a historical and geographical area in Montenegro stretching between the Rumija Mountain, Tarabos hill, Bojana River and Skadar Lake. Krajina was first mentioned in the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja (from the 12th century) as Craini, the place where the castle of Vladimir, the Prince of Duklja, was located, as well as the monastery of the Virgin Mary of Krajina. This area located between Skadar Lake and Mountain Rumija is rich in picturesque monasteries and churches, desert islands and authentic villages. Numerous cultural and historical monuments, archeological sites, medieval monastery complexes and fortifications testify that this area has been a significant cultural center since ancient times. As the legend has it, Ada Bojana appeared in 1858, at the mouth of Bojana River in the Adriatic Sea, on a place where the ship called Merito wrecked into the sea. Along with two nearby islands the shipwrecks were then retaining river sediment for years and created the beautiful island of Ada.
    [Show full text]