<<

Jpn.J.Leprosy 66,181-189(1997)

Leprosy Control Programme in Zone Division, Union of

Tin Maung Aye * Leprosy Research Center Notional Institute of Infectius Diseases

Leprosy Control Programme Kalay myo, Sagaing Division Union Of Myanmar

(Received 16 Oct 1997)

Key words: Leprosy control, Kalay, Myanmar.

1 . Profile (Country profile and Area profile) 1) Location Myanmar, one of the South-east Asia, is located on the western edge of the Indo-China peninsula. It is bounded by the Thailand and Laos in the east , China in the north and north-east, in the north-west, Bangladesh in the west and by Indian Ocean in the south-west and south. Myanmar consists of 7 divisions and 7 states. The whole country population is about nearly 45 mil- lion in 1996 (Fig.l). Kalay area is situated within Sagaing division and located on the north-west part of the coun- try (Fig). It is nearly 1200 kilometer far away from the Capital, (former name Rangoon) Fig.1. Map of Union Of Myanmar Kalay zone consists of three districts . and one township. Total population in the Kaly zone is to another during the rainy season (July, August 77,7743 in 1996. Kalay zone is also a border area and September). and it is very difficult to travel from one district

*Corresponding author:(JICA) staff 2) Geography National Institute of Infectious Diseases Geographically. Myanmar can be divided into 4-2-1, Aoba-cho, Higashimurayama-shi. hilly, coastal, dry area, an area of plains, valleys Tokyo 189, Japan Present address: Tim Maung Aye and a delta region . Administratively, the coun- No.32-34, 5+6th floor try is divided into 14 States and Divisions. There PATHEIN ROAD, SANCHAUNG TOWNSHIP are 52 Districts, 320 Townships,13,762 Village YANGON, UNION OF MYANMAR

181 tracts and 65,325 villages in the whole country. ease in Union of Myanmar. The Leprosy Control Kalay zone is composed of valley and hilly areas. Program In Myanmar was started on 1951-52 and There are 3 districts and one township. The dis- up to now. The development phases of leprosy tricts are Kalay, Tamu and . One town- control program in Myanmar from 1951-52 to up ship is township. Within Kalay zone it to date is shown in Table 1 2) consists of 7 townships, these are Kalay, Kalay- 1) Developmental phase wa,Mingin, Tamu, Mawlaik, Phaungbyin and Leprosy has been endemic in Myanmar since Homalin township. the ancient days. Among the communicable dis- 3 ) People eases, it cause the greatest socio-economic prob- Myanmar is a union of many nationalities as lem due to its disfigurement and disabilities. The many as 135 groups, speaking over one hundred government decided to launch a five-year languages and dialects. The term Myanmar em- programme to cover the whole country by 1968. braces all nationalities. In Kalay zone there are During the consolidation and maintenance phase so many nationalities and ethics groups. The of Leprosy Control (1969-1977) field trials for in- majorities are Bamar and Chin. tegration of leprosy control activities into Basic 4) Religion Health Service (BHS) was made continuously in In Myanmar over 80% are Buddhist. There are selected areas. With the experiences gained in also Christians, Muslims and Hindus. In Kalay these integration trials, the government decided zone the same. to integrate leprosy control and other disease control activities into BHS under the People's 2. Leprosy Control Project Health Plan I (PHP I) (1977-1980) in phased man- eprosy is a chronic L infectious disease caused ner till 1988. by Vlycobacteriumleprae, an acid-fast,rod-shaped During this period case finding , treatment bacillus. The disease mainly affects the skin, the with Dapsone and registration activities were in- peripheral nerves, mucosa of the upper respira- tegrated whereas patient assessment, epidemio- tory tract and also the eyes, apart from some logical investigation and other technical compo- other structures1). nents were still undertaken by the specialized Leprosy is one of the major communicable dis- Leprosy Control Project personnel. A national

Table 1. Developmental phase of Leprosy control Programme Jpn.J.Leprosy 66,181-189 (1997) regimen consisting of Rifampicin, Clofazimine and 120/10,000 (Bago &Kawa Survey 1991) to 240/ Dapsone was tried and implemented to treat the 10,000 (1973 National assessment survey) de- " open" cases(Multibacillary/ Lepromatous M B) pending on the "case" definition and other fac- throughout the country from 1979 till 1986.With tors. At the end of 1994 using WHO correction the advice of World Health Organization (WHO), factor method (Quick & dirty method), it was the present Multi Drug Therapy (MDT) regi- estimated there can be 50,781 cases in the coun- men with fixed duration was initiated in 6 hyper try. At the end of 1995, there was 21,071 regis- endemic divisions, Ayeyarwady,Bago,Mag- tered cases and prevalence rate was 4.7/10,000. way,,Sagaing and Yangon in a phase At the end of 1996, there were only 18,969 cases manner by vertical staff since 1988. But at the and prevalence rate was 4.2/10,000 in the whole end of 1990, it was recognized that, the present country(2). leprosy control manpower will not be sufficient The registered prevalence was reduced from to cover all the cases within the short period. 39.9 /10,000 in 1988 to 4.2 /10,000 at the end of Hence in addition to previously integrated activi- 1996 ( Fig. 2)(2). ties, MDT activities was also integrated into BHS In Kalay Zone , at the beginning of MDT , there by the mid-1991. were 433 registered cases , and the prevalence Even though WHO MDT regimen was intro- rate was 5.9/10,000 . At the end of 1996 there duced in Myanmar since 1988, in Kalay area it was 233 registered cases and prevalence rate was was started in 1994. 3/10,000. 2) Policy The registered prevalence rate was reduced The National Health Committee formulated the from 5.9/10,000 to 3/10,000 at the end of 1996 National Health Policy in 1993. It governs and (Fig.4)(3). guides all health activities carried by the Minis- 2) MDT coverage try of Health for raising the level of health of the As MDT was integrated , coverage during the people.It is also committed to the objectives of" period was accelerated. At the end of 1996, total Health for all by the year 2000" goals to be imple- 18,969 patients (100%) were under MDT, and all mented in Primary Health Care approach. the 320 townships were under MDT, in the whole In accordance to the policy guide lines, leprosy country. In Kalay zone , (233) patients (100%) elimination was given a high priority and ranked and all the townships within the area, were un- No.8 in the National Health Plan 1993-1996.There- der MDT. fore the Ministry of Health is committed to the 3) New case finding activities WHO's global goal of leprosy elimination by re- Due to the introduction of MDT and intensifi- ducing the prevalence to below 1/10,000 popula- cation of both active and passive case finding tion by the year 2000. activities , more new cases were detected and brought under MDT. During 1996, a total of 4784 3. Present Situation cases were detected in the whole country. New 1) Magnitude of the problem case detection rate in the whole country was 10.6/ Leprosy still remains to be a public health prob- 100,000 population. In Kalay zone, 145 cases lem of the country and it ranks No. 8 in the plan- were detected through both active and passive ning of National Health Plan II (1993-1996).Since case finding activities and brought under MDT. the implementation, various surveys were per- New case detection rate in Kalay zone was 18.6/ formed to estimate the leprosy burden in the 100,000 population. MB rate among new case country. The estimate prevalence rate varied from was 44.8%. Among these new cases , 72 cases

183 were detected through mass survey. Therefore school teacher and parents for integrated educa- .mass survey detection rate was 25/100,000. New tion. There was no gross disability among these case finding ratio of the children below the age cases. of 14 years was 16.55%. New case finding from 4) Disability rate 1994 to 1996 in Kalay Zone is shown in(Fig. 5)(3). Various surveys were conducted to determine Special attention was given to children to de- the disability grade among the registered cases. tect early case. At the present 6.3%, and 7.7% of Bago, Kawa survey, 1991, and Hmawbi survey the registered patients of the whole country and showed 17.25% of disabilities Grade II among the Kalay zone respectively are children below the registered cases. Grade II disabilities among new age of 14 years..These cases were detected by case in MDT area was reported to be 9-11%(2). examine the school children, children contacts of In Kalay zone disabilities grade II among new the leprosy cases and by health education. Chil- cases was 12.6%. dren attending school are encourage to continue 5) Cure rate education and health education was given to According to the efficiency of the WHO MDT

Fig.2. Yearly Registered Cases Of Leprosy In MYANMAR Fig.5. New Cases Detected In KALAY ZONE

Fig.4. Cace Summary In KALAYZONE Fig.6. Release From Treatment (RFT) Cases In KALAY (from 1994 to 1996) ZONE (from 1994 to 1996)

184 .

Jpn.J.Leprosy 66,181-189 (1997)

regimen , more cases were released from treat- try. A cumulative total of 146,847 cases were ment as cured. During 1996 alone, 5768 cases released from treatment at the end of 1996(2) were released from treatment in the whole coun- In Kalay zone, during 1996, 346 cases were released from treatment as cured. A cumulative total of 635 cases were released from treatment from 1994 to at the end of 1996. Epidemiological and operational indicators, according to various townships, under Kalay zone are mentioned in Table 2(3). MDT progress from 1994 to 1996 in Kalay zone is shown in (Fig. 3)(3).

4. Leprosy Elimination Project in Myanmar (1996-2001) The government of the Union of Myanmar is committed for the elimination of leprosy as a public health problem of the country by the year 2000.This is in accordance to WHOs global goal of leprosy elimination by the year 2000, which resolution was adopted at the 44th World Health Assembly in 1991.Inorder to achieve above goals Fig.3. MDT proguress chart in KALAYZONE (from 1994 of elimination, the programme is ongoing to 1996) programme in an integrated approach, making the basic health services which are responsible

Table 2. Epidemiological And Operational Indicators Average (1996) In KALAYZONE

185 agency for implementation, while specialized lep- bring out the hidden cases in the community, so rosy control teams sustaining the technical sup- that epidemiological impact due to MDT as a tool port. for interruption of the chain of transmission can The Leprosy Control Project (LCP) has a tech- be observed as soon as possible by both Active nical organization at Central, State and Divisional Case Detection methods (Contact examination, level and District levels. These teams at the State/ School examination, Mass or total population Divisional and District levels are stationed under survey) and Passive Case Detection methods. the administration of the Basic Health Service Effective treatment with MDT (BHS) at the respective levels. WHO, MDT regimen with the fixed duration Special actions such as clinical research, health of treatment will be the main chemotherapy ap- system research, sentinel monitoring and other plied in the field and integrated approach through action such as evaluation and monitoring were BHS. carried out by the LCP personal in conjunction Case holding with BHS. At the township levels, the township As the patients have to be treated utmost to a medical officer are supported either by a junior period of three years, a systematic case holding leprosy worker (JLW) or assistant Leprosy In- is essential. It is also crucial to have reliable, fea- spector, and Leprosy Inspector in hyperendemic sible and continuous information, and case hold- area. ing becomes very important activity. Case hold- 1) Objectives ing will initiate from the time of registration with General objective is to eliminate leprosy as one individual patient which will be maintained at of the major health problems of the country by implementers level during the time of treatment achieving the global goal of reducing the leprosy and then transferred to LCP after Release From prevalence to a level of less than one per 10,000 Treatment (RFT) for further surveillance. Essen- population by the year 2000 and promotion of tial and important information's will be transferred medical and social rehabilitation. to activity register to be maintain at Rural Health 2 ) Strategies Center (RHC) and township levels. The main strategies for leprosy elimination is Assessment to reduce the endemicity of the disease of the Clinical and Bacteriological assessment of the community and interrupting the chain of trans- individual patients will be carried by LCP per- mission with the available potent tools for the sonal with fixed frequencies. Only passive sur- prompt, effective and adequate chemotherapy to veillance of RFT cases will be carried on. Any all known cases. To be more meaningful and to findings such as relapse or complication will be bring epidemiological impact within the shortest treated. period is also crucial. It is also important as a Prevention of Disability mean of prevention of disabilities among the pa- Prevention of disability among the leprosy cases tients. Full MDT coverage with intensified case under treatment and those who have completed finding is the main strategy to attain the above MDT will be carried in the field by LCP personal mentioned objectives. will be enforced for the management of compli- The impractical isolations and legislation are cation, neuritis and reaction at the periphery with not be practiced nor enforced. appropriate technology and available resources. 3 ) Implementation activities Capacity Building Intensive new case finding activities. Capacity building of BHS personal will be per- New case finding activities are important to formed by refresher courses of the township level

186 Jpn.J.Leprosy 66,181-189 (1997) annual by the local LCP personal for more cost Communication (IEC) approaches. effective case finding and care and management of the cases at peripheral level .LCP personal will 5. Monitoring and Evaluation also be trained for Prevention Of Disability (POD) 1) Monitoring Prevention Of Worsening Disability (POWD), Implementation activities are to be monitored management of case and programme and also from administrative as well as technical staff by for impact evaluation methodologies by refresher means of field visit and reviewing reports and course of two weeks each year at Yangon and returns. It is necessary to monitor the accom- Mandalay training centers. plishment of service activities and targets as Information Education and Communication (I E C) planned. All available IEC methods will be applied to 2) Evaluation sustain the political and government to commit- annual programme evaluation will be done by ted and to increase the public awareness. both BHS and LCP staff from township level to Rehabilitation the central level ..Evaluate by using the follow- Personal Affected Leprosy (PAL) will need ing six essential indicators. socio-economic and physical rehabilitation. Reha- a. Registered prevalence rate per 10,000 popula- bilitation activities are to be intensified in a com- tion. munity base approach. Community Base Reha- b. New case detection rate per 100,000 popula- bilitation (CBR) in villages and also providing some tion. out reach POD and POWD activities at the Rural c. Proportion of patients with disability grade II Health Center (RHC) level. among newly detected cases. Research d. MDT coverage. The ongoing research activities will continue e. Cure rate. as per time schedule given in the respective pro- f. Relapse rate. tocols. Reporting 6. Benefits Based on the present leprosy reporting sys- a. By achieving the global goal of 1/10,000, the tem , a standardized reporting system will be endemicity will be reduce and transmission developed to get a continuous monitoring and will be interrupted. feed back. It will also include to get information on b. Leprosy will no more be a public problem of six essential indicators recommended by WHO. the country. Co-ordination and co-operation c. PALs will be rehabilitated both physically and Intrasectoral co-ordination with appropriate socio-economically. units within the ministry of health will be call in d. By reducing the infection, through new lep- by forming sub committees for important tasks. rosy cases may be detected but no more or Interdepartmental co-operation will be work for less disability among them. socio economic rehabilitation of PAL s. Both e. More BHS and LCP were trained in leprosy. National and International Non Government Or- f. Community knowledge and awareness in- ganizations (NGO) will be co-ordinated and co- creased. operated for the success of the project. Commu- g. Less cost for maintaining disable personal care. nity participation and community involvement h. More appropriate technologies in clinical thera- Community participation and involvement will be peutics and Health System development for attained by different Information ,Education and future strategies.

187 i. Can look forward for a leprosy free commu- ACKNOWLEDGMENT nity in foreseeable future. I would like to pay respect to my Laboratory chief, Dr Nomaguchi in National Institute of Lep- REFERENCES rosy Research (NILR) , Tokyo, Japan for her guidance and encouragement . I also give my 1. A guide to eliminating leprosy as a public thanks to Dr Tin Shwe, Deputy Director and Dr health problem, World Health Organiza- Kyaw Myint, Regional Officer, of Leprosy Con- tion.1995. trol Programme, Department of health ,Union of 2. Leprosy Control Programme, Union of Myanmar for providing me to study in Japan. Myanmar, 1996. 3. Annual report of leprosy control programme. Kalay zone, 1996. Jpn.J.Leprosy 66,181-189 (1997)

ミャンマー、セガイン州カリイにおける ハ ン セ ン病 の コ ン トロ ー ル ・プ ロ グ ラ ム

テ ィ ン ・ マ ウ ン ・ エ イ* 国 立 感 染 症 研 究 所 ハ ン セ ン病 セ ン タ ー ミ ャ ンマ ー、 セ ガ イ ン州 カ リイ、 ハ ンセ ン病 コ ン トロ ー ル プ ロ グ ラム 部 門

受 付;1997年10月16日] [

ミャンマー、セガイン州における、ハンセン病についての状況を詳細に述べ、ミャンマーにおけるこ れ か ら の ハ ン セ ン病 コ ン トロ ー ル 対 策 に つ い て 報 告 し て い る 。

* Corresponding author: 現 住 所:No.32-34,5+6th floor Pathein Road,Sanchaung Township Yangon,Union of MYANMAR

189