DOCSLIB.ORG

Biosecurity Manual for the Papaya Industry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biosecurity Manual for the Papaya Industry Reducing the risk of pests entering and becoming established in your orchard Version 1.0 Plant Health Australia (PHA) is the national © Plant Health Australia 2013 coordinator of the government-industry Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant partnership for plant biosecurity in Australia. Health Australia Limited, except when content As a not-for-profit company, PHA services has been provided by other contributors, the needs of Members and independently in which case copyright may be owned by advocates on behalf of the national plant another person. With the exception of any biosecurity system. PHA’s efforts help material protected by a trade mark and except minimise plant pest impacts, enhance where otherwise indicated in this publication, Australia’s plant health status, assist trade, this publication is licensed under a Creative safeguard the livelihood of producers, Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. support the sustainability and profitability Any use of this publication, other than as of plant industries and the communities authorised under this licence or copyright that rely upon them, and preserve law, is prohibited. environmental health and amenity. www.planthealthaustralia.com.au http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. Papaya Australia is the peak industry body for the Australian papaya industry whose In referencing this document, the preferred aim is to encourage the growth and citation is: development of the industry. Papaya Plant Health Australia Ltd (2013) Biosecurity Australia aims to supply Australian Manual for the Papaya Industry (Version 1 August consumers with high-quality, papaya 2013). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. all year-round, while delivering a good return on investment for growers. The industry Requests and enquiries concerning highly values the spirit of cooperation and reproduction and rights should be addressed sharing between growers; the benefits to the Communications Manager at PHA. of united activities such as research and development and marketing; its relationship Phone: 02 6215 7700 with local communities; care for the Fax: 02 6260 4321 environment; and the general camaraderie E-mail: [email protected] and goodwill of its people. Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au www.australianpapaya.com.au An electronic copy of this manual is available from the website listed above and from the Farm Biosecurity website www.farmbiosecurity.com.au Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) is a not- as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material for-profit, industry-owned company. It works contained in this publication without first obtaining in partnership with Australia’s horticulture specific and independent professional advice. industries to invest in research, development and marketing programs that provide benefit Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all to industry and the wider community. Papaya and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done Australia is a class A member of HAL. by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, www.horticulture.com.au on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Table of contents Six easy ways to protect your farm 2 Biosecurity overview 4 What is biosecurity? 4 What is orchard biosecurity? 4 Regional biosecurity 5 Pests 6 High priority exotic pest threats of the papaya industry 6 Papaya pests already present in Australia 9 Early detection and reporting of pests 10 Monitoring your orchard 10 What to do if you find something unusual 11 The Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed 12 Owner Reimbursement Costs 12 People and biosecurity 14 Biosecurity signs 14 Managing threats from people movement 14 Casual workers and tourists 15 Overseas travellers 15 Contractors and utility providers 16 Vehicles and equipment 19 Vehicle access 19 Vehicle hygiene 20 Equipment hygiene and storage 20 Dedicated equipment for high risk areas 21 Wash-down facilities 21 Production management 22 Planting and propagating material 22 Biosecurity and Quality Assurance 22 Chemical residues 23 Waste fruit and plant material 23 Biosecurity Best Practice checklist 24 Further information 28 Visitor register 30 Pest monitoring sheet 31 Fact sheets 32 Six easy ways to protect your farm You have an important role to play in protecting your property and the entire papaya industry from biosecurity threats. 2 Here are six easy ways you can reduce the threat of new pests entering and establishing on your property. Each of these pest management practices should be embedded in your orchard’s everyday operations and management. Don’t put your livelihood at risk by neglecting farm biosecurity. 1. Be aware of pests that pose a risk to papaya Make sure you and your orchard workers are familiar with the most important exotic papaya pest threats. See page 6 for high priority pest threats to the papaya industry. 2. Keep it clean Practice good farm hygiene to reduce the risk of pests entering and spreading around your property. Provide cleaning facilities so workers and visitors can clean hands and feet before entering or leaving your property. Vehicles and equipment can harbour pests and transfer them within and between orchards. Have a designated parking area, provide wash-down facilities, and use clean equipment on-farm. Ensure all planting and propagating material is from trusted sources and dispose of waste fruit and plant material carefully. 3. Monitor your orchard Constant vigilance is vital for early detection of any exotic plant pest threat. Check your trees frequently. Knowing the usual appearance of your crops together with any common pests will help you recognise anything unusual. 4. Train, plan and record Ensure that staff are well trained and that you keep records of purchases, sales and movements on and off your property. Consider any potential biosecurity weaknesses and plan to improve practices. 5. Abide by the law Be aware of and abide by laws and regulations that have been established to protect the papaya industry, Australian agriculture, and your region. Your state or territory department of agriculture is the best source of information on movement restrictions and other requirements. 6. Report anything unusual If you suspect a new pest – report it immediately to the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline. Early detection provides the best chance of eradicating a new pest. To learn more about protecting your property from biosecurity risks visit the farm biosecurity website www.farmbiosecurity.com.au 3 Biosecurity overview This manual is designed to assist you in 4 protecting your property and the papaya The definition of a pest used in this industry from new and invasive pests. manual covers all insects, mites, By implementing the recommended snails, nematodes, pathogens measures in your day-to-day operations, (diseases) and weeds that may harm you will improve your own biosecurity plants or plant products. Exotic and that of your region, while minimising pests are those not currently present produce losses, unnecessary costs and in Australia. Established pests are the risk of losing export markets. those present within Australia. What is biosecurity? What is orchard biosecurity? Biosecurity is about the protection of Orchard biosecurity is a set of measures livelihoods, lifestyles and the natural designed to protect a property from environment, which could be harmed the entry and spread of pests. Orchard by the introduction of new pests. biosecurity is your responsibility, and that of every person working on or visiting Biosecurity is a national priority, your property. implemented off-shore, at the border and on-farm. Growers can play a key role in protecting the Australian papaya industry from Australia’s geographic isolation has exotic pests. If a new pest becomes meant that we have relatively few of established in your orchard, it will affect the pests that affect plant industries your business through increased orchard overseas. Freedom from these exotic costs (for additional monitoring and pests is a vital part of the future chemical use, alternative production profitability and sustainability of Australia’s practices, and the associated labour plant industries. Biosecurity allows us to costs), reduced productivity (yield and/ preserve existing trade opportunities and or quality reductions) and, potentially, provide evidence to support new market reduced market access opportunities. negotiations. Early detection and immediate reporting All Australians have a role to play in of all exotic pests or diseases increases biosecurity: governments, industries, the chance of effective and efficient communities, individual producers as eradication of pests new to Australia well as travellers and farm visitors. or to your region. Biosecurity is everybody’s business. Regional biosecurity 5 Biosecurity in your region can be strengthened through a collaborative approach. Engagement of the community, together with an understanding of the region’s vulnerabilities and the potential source and nature of threats can focus regional efforts. Biosecurity awareness in your region can be supported by a commitment
Recommended publications
  • Fijian Fruit Fly

    Fijian Fruit Fly

    Fact sheet Fijian fruit fly What is the Fijian fruit fly? Fijian fruit fly (Bactrocera passiflorae) is a small fly that attacks a range of fruit including papaya. Like all fruit flies, it can cause a significant amount of damage to fruit and make fruit unmarketable. This pest has the potential to have a significant impact on the Australian papaya industry. What does it look like? The Fijian fruit fly has a black coloured body with a black abdomen and clear wings. It is approximately 6-8mm long. Accurate diagnosis requires expert 1 mm examination of the fly under a microscope. Museum Victoria, PaDIL Ken Walker Dorsal view of adult Fijian fruit fly What can it be confused with? At first glance most fruit flies are very similar. The Fijian fruit fly can be differentiated from other fruit flies by its predominantly black colour. If you see any unusual fruit flies consult an agronomist or contact the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline on 1800 084 881. What should I look for? Adult Fijian fruit flies are visible to the naked eye so you should keep a look out for small black coloured fruit flies, especially around fallen or damaged fruit. Traps placed in your orchard may also help you look for fruit flies. You should also look for distorted, dropped or rotten fruit as these symptoms can be Ken Walker Museum Victoria, PaDIL Ken Walker caused by fruit flies. Report any unusual fruit flies in Lateral view of Fijian fruit fly. Note: fly is predominantly black your orchard to the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline on in colour 1800 084 881.
  • Biosecurity in Australia: a Working Partnership and Shared Responsibility

    Biosecurity in Australia: a Working Partnership and Shared Responsibility

    Biosecurity in Australia: a working partnership and shared responsibility Dennis Bittisnich Biosecurity Services Group Outline • Australian agriculture in context • Biosecurity control in Australia: a brief background • PPPs in Australian biosecurity: a shared responsibility • Observations: key factors in Australian biosecurity PPPs Australian Agriculture in Context • Geographically isolated; unique flora and fauna; many climatic zones • Political federation of 8 state and territory governments under a commonwealth government • Only 10% land area is arable • 0.3% global population • 3% of global agricultural trade • Beef, wheat, wine, wool, lamb, feed, dairy Australian Agriculture in Context • Historically Australian economy “rode on the sheep’s back”; significant wool, lamb and cereal exporter • Ag nearly 30% of national GDP at peak (now 5% GDP; 60% is exported; 5:1 export:import) • Premium for “clean green” credentials; esp. from favourable animal/plant disease status • Biosecurity threats were thus high on industry, political, and trade agenda Australian Agriculture in Context • In last 10-15 years: exports levelled off; drought & international competition • Agri-food imports doubled; mostly from developing countries • International passengers and cargo doubled - globalization • Emerging/altered spread of disease • ALSO: Trading partner requirements/SPS disciplines more rigorously applied Biosecurity control in Australia • Historically public management of biosecurity (also food safety; ag R&D) seen as a government “public good” (beneficiaries
  • Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow Et Al

    Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow Et Al

    Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow et al. Australasian Agribusiness Perspectives 2017, Volume 20, Paper 8 ISSN: 1442-6951 Biosecurity in Australia: An Assessment of the Current Funding Approach Ruth Ahchowa, Garry Griffithb and Susan Hesterc * a Former postgraduate student, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Director, Economics, Regulation and Policy, EY, Melbourne. b Principal Fellow, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Professorial Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale. c Senior Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale; and Chief Investigator, Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Australian governments and industries have limited resources to tackle established pests and diseases and to prevent new incursions. As the biosecurity threats to Australia’s economy, environment and society change, it is important that the funding and governance of responses are appropriately aligned and resourced. Key decisions concern which biosecurity threats will receive funding, how much funding they will receive, and who will be responsible for providing the funding. In this paper we review the current national approach to biosecurity funding, and a high level assessment is made against economic and public policy principles for allocation of resources to biosecurity. The review finds that the primary assessment for determining funding of national biosecurity response is benefit-cost analysis. However, benefit-cost analysis is often restricted to providing a net benefit of responding to one plant or animal pest or disease. The conclusion is that an approach which considers a portfolio of pests and diseases may be more appropriate in a limited resource environment.
  • Biosecurity and Quarantine Arrangements

    Biosecurity and Quarantine Arrangements

    Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements Senate Inquiry – August 2010 Contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 2 Terms of Reference...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The adequacy of current biosecurity and quarantine arrangements, including resourcing 3 2.2 Projected demand and resourcing requirements ....................................................... 5 2.3 Progress in implementation of the ‘Beale Review’ recommendations and their place in meeting projected biosecurity demand and resourcing ......................................................... 6 2.4 Any related matters ............................................................................................. 9 Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements 2 Senate Inquiry – August 2010 1 Summary The Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity (CRCNPB) started operating in November 2005 in recognition of the need to strengthen the plant biosecurity scientific capacity of Australia. The CRCNPB coordinates plant biosecurity research across all Australian states and territories and has an extensive collaborative network of researchers and educators from 24 participating organisations representing industry, universities, state and Australian governments. A key strength of the CRCNPB is the involvement of its participants who are, in many cases, end- users of research results. This ensures maximum benefit
  • Plant Biosecurity in Australia

    Plant Biosecurity in Australia

    Proceedings VII World Avocado Congress 2011 (Actas VII Congreso Mundial del Aguacate 2011). Cairns, Australia. 5 – 9 September 2011 Plant biosecurity in Australia – a powerful government–industry partnership Greg Fraser Plant Health Australia Abstract The ability of governments and industries to work together and share responsibility for designing and managing the plant biosecurity system in Australia has been a crucial development over the last 15 years. Plant Health Australia (PHA) was established in 2000 as a not-for-profit company to breathe life into this partnership and support its strengthening and expansion over time. The model’s success has enabled a wide range of nationally significant challenges to be addressed and agreements to be put in place to deliver improved biosecurity outcomes. While the partnership continues to evolve there are lessons to be drawn from the experience of Australia and the potential for transfer of the approach to other countries. PHA, as the national coordinating body for plant biosecurity in Australia, services the needs of its government and industry members and acts as an independent advocate for the national plant biosecurity system. The company’s efforts help minimise new plant pest impacts, enhance Australia’s plant biosecurity status, assist trade and market access for Australia’s plant products, safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. Key words Plant, biosecurity, Australia, government, industry, partnership, national Introduction Australia, in plant biosecurity terms, is the lucky country. Natural geographic isolation and a strong focus on biosecurity have ensured that Australia remains free from many plant pests that adversely affect agriculture, horticulture and forestry in other parts of the world.
  • The Future of Biosecurity in Australia

    The Future of Biosecurity in Australia

    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 152, part 1, 2019, pp. 121–128. ISSN 0035-9173/19/010121-08 The future of biosecurity in Australia Eddie Holmes Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, and School of Life & Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney E-mail: [email protected] was assigned the task of talking about If it had come here, who knows what would I biosecurity, and biosecurity, it turns out, have happened. SARS was a major warning is an extremely broad term that can be used shock. in a wide variety of ways so I’m just going to At the same time as these human out- use it in the context of, as Brian notes, infec- breaks, our cultural systems face a very major tious diseases, particularly on what Australia threat too. Exactly at the same time as SARS, may need to do to prevent and respond to in the Netherlands there was an outbreak future epidemics. (which I’m sure you haven’t heard about) of H7N7 influenza, a very nasty, highly viru- SARS and other ’flu-like respiratory lent H7 strain of avian ’flu. This was com- viruses pletely concurrent with the SARS outbreak. If you wind the clock back just a few years, The Dutch authorities were so scared about you all remember the SARS outbreak of this that they basically went through a mass 2003. The numbers of people infected were culling operation of chickens in Holland to not actually that great: overall globally about eliminate the virus.
  • Fruit Flies in American Samoa, Niue, Tokelau, Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna

    Fruit Flies in American Samoa, Niue, Tokelau, Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna

    PEST ADVISORY LEAFLET NO. 39 Plant Protection Service Secretariat of the Pacific Community 2001 Fruit Flies in American Samoa, Niue, Tokelau, Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna Six fruit fly species have been recorded from trapping and B. distincta, B. obscura and B. new species near host fruit surveys in American Samoa, Niue, Wallis and passiflorae, attack non-edible, wild or forest fruits and Futuna, Tuvalu and Tokelau (Table 1). These include three vegetables. economic species (Bactrocera kirki, B. xanthodes and B. passiflorae) and three non-economic species (B. Little information is available on the range of host plants distincta, B. obscura and B. new species near infested by fruit flies in the country and territories covered passiflorae). in this leaflet. Total number of economic and wild hosts cited in Table 1 are based on intensive host fruit surveying Fruit flies are economically important because they cause carried out since 1991 under the Regional Fruit Fly Project damage to fruits and vegetables that are of commercial in Cook Islands, Tonga, Samoa, Fiji Islands, and since 1997 value or are edible, and hinder international and domestic as part of the Oriental fruit fly eradication programme in trade of fruits and fleshy vegetables. They center their French Polynesia. Host records cited under species profiles activities on the host plant, which provide sites for adult for B. xanthodes, B. kirki and B. passiflorae provide an feeding, mating, egg laying, larval development and pupae indication of what the most common hosts may be in the development in the soil underneath the plant. The adult fe- countries and territories covered here.
  • Fijian Fruit Fly

    Fijian Fruit Fly

    Fact sheet Exotic threats of tropical fruit: Fijian fruit fly What is it? The Fijian fruit fly (Bactrocera passiflorae) affects more than 55 crop species in Fiji, including avocado, cashew, cocoa, guava, kumquat, lime, lychee, mandarin, mango, papaya, pomelo and tropical almond. If this fruit fly species was to be introduced into Australia and become established, it could cause serious damage to our tropical The Fijian fruit fly (Bactrocera fruit industries. passiflorae). Image Ken Walker, Museum Victoria, What do I look for? Pest & Diseases Image Library Fruit flies are pest insects whose larvae (maggots) live in and feed (PaDIL), www.padil.gov.au. off the flesh of fruit and vegetables. Fruit should be inspected for any symptoms of infestation, such as puncture marks and any associated necrosis and decomposition of the fruit that appears as black or brown lesions. Suspect fruits should be cut open and checked for larvae. The Fijian fruit fly has four life stages: eggs, larvae (maggots), pupae, and the adult flies. The eggs are about 0.8 mm long and 0.2 mm wide, white to yellow-white in colour, and are laid under the skin of the fruit. The mature larvae are about 7.5 – 9.5 mm long and 1.5 – 2 mm wide. Pupae are barrel-shaped and are white to yellow- brown in colour. The adult flies are mostly black with some yellow markings (see picture). Bactrocera passiflorae is difficult to identify accurately. Suspect samples of the pest must be sent to a laboratory for identification. If you see any of these life stages of the Fijian fruit fly, you should keep samples for identification and report your findings immediately.
  • Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers

    Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers

    Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers A guide to farm biosecurity measures to reduce the risks of weeds, pests and diseases impacting production Version 1.0 January 2017 © Plant Health Australia Limited 2017 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has Plant Health Australia (PHA) is the national been provided by other contributors, in which case coordinator of the government-industry partnership copyright may be owned by another person. With for plant biosecurity in Australia. As a not-for-profit the exception of any material protected by a trade company, PHA services the needs of Members and mark and except where otherwise indicated in independently advocates on behalf of the national this publication, this publication is licensed under plant biosecurity system. a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as PHA’s efforts help minimise plant pest impacts, authorised under this licence or copyright enhance Australia’s plant health status, assist trade, law, is prohibited. safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. planthealthaustralia.com.au This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit CANEGROWERS is the peak body for Australian to Plant Health Australia (as below). sugarcane growers. CANEGROWERS Australia In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: represents around 80% of Australia’s sugarcane Plant Health Australia Ltd (2017) Biosecurity Manual growers.
  • Mango Fruiting Period

    Mango Fruiting Period

    ,£; c: 0 E I ~ ""iii'" E'" '0 100 0 c: 50 i 0.- - Q) c:- c:- ~ c: ~ 1il in in in • ::; ::> ..., ::J .0 1i .0 -" '" '"2 ~ ..., " g> E g E E " .0 « ., ~ ,'f i 0 1) ~ (J) z 0 month Figure 1. Host Availability of Fruit Flies at Dobuilevu Research Station, Ra. 1000 900 800 ,£; c: 700 0 E :;; 600 c. '"c. B,x 500 jg -,l,-B,d $ 'li! 400 E '0 300 0 c: 200 100 0 ,r:; ., c: ~ in in in in ~ ~ '" 1i .0 .0 .0 ::J ::J ~ ::;'" ..., ..., is, c: ::; ~ " " ::l E ..., « ., '" u.ii i., 8 1) ~ (J) z ~ month Figure 2. Host Availability of Fruit Flies at Legalega Research Station, Nadi. 107 1400 breadfruit 1200 mango Barringtonia edulis ~ 1000 E as Syzygium a. 800 ~B.p Q. ,!l; Pometia -~B.x ~ 600 -6--Bd E 0 11 '"c: 400 200 0 .c /!> /!> u iO' c: 2?:- 1n L.~., Iii Iii K :::;: '"::> ..,:J :J 1i .a .Cl .Cl (ij « .., CD 0 E E '"c" ~'" :::;: ti .., .i! 0 2l '" u. i ~ (I) '" &l z 0 month Figure 3. Host Availability of Fruit Flies at Nabua, Suva. 1200 Syzygium I 1000 mango I E0 E 800 "a. ~B.p '"a. ~ 600 ..~.iiiI-- B.x ., ........... B.d <ii'" E a 400 '"c: 200 0 ... j::::::.. -::t:== .. • .~.~ . 2?:- 1n Iii •Iii ~ iO' c :J •:J .a .a ~ ~ ::;; '" .., 1i ~ :J :J .., 0> E :::;: ~ " :J ~ E E ..,!ii '" « 0 > u.-2 a" '"0 ~ z 0 f/)" month Figure 4. Host Availability of Fruit Flies at Naduruloulou Research Station, NauaorL 108 350 mango I mango 300 guava I Syzygium Pometia 250 breadfruit ~ E ¥ 200 a.Cl.
  • Biosecurity Program

    Biosecurity Program

    2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 Drivers of Change .................................................................................................................. 6 National Bee Biosecurity Program ............................................................................................ 8 Aim ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 10 Code of Practice ...................................................................................................................... 10 Expected Outcomes and Benefits ........................................................................................... 11 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 12 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................... 12 National Management and Governance ................................................................................... 13 Bee Biosecurity Program Steering Committee .........................................................................
  • Fiji Fruit Flies (170) Relates To: Fruit Flies

    Fiji Fruit Flies (170) Relates To: Fruit Flies

    Pacific Pests, Pathogens & Weeds - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Fiji fruit flies (170) Relates to: Fruit flies Photo 1. Bactrocera kirki. Photo 2. Fiji fruit fly, Bactrocera passiflorae. Photo 4. Pacific fruit fly, Bactrocera xanthodes, laying Photo 3. Pacific fruit fly, Bactrocera xanthodes. eggs. Photo 5. Fruit fly eggs. Photo 6. Fruit fly larvae or maggots. Photo 8. Newspaper with edges folded and stapled to form a bag in which to insert fruit to protect it from Photo 7. Fruit fly pupae. fruit flies. Photo 9. Banana leaves used to wrap a fruit bunch to prevent attack by fruit flies, other pests, and to promote uniform ripening, in Papua New Guinea. Common Name There are seven fruit flies in Fiji: The species of economic importance are: (i) Bactrocera kirki (no common name), (ii) Bactrocera xanthodes (the Pacific fruit fly), (iii) Bactrocera passiflorae (Fijian fruit fly), (iv) Bactrocera distincta, and (v) Bactrocera species near passiflorae. Bactrocera gnetum and Bactrocera obscura are not of economic importance. Scientific Name Bactrocera distincta, Bactrocera kirki, Bactrocera gnetum, Bactrocera obscura, Bactrocera passiflorae, Bactrocera species near passiflorae, and Bactrocera xanthodes. Bactrocera xanthodes is closely related to three other species: Bactrocera paraxanthodea in New Caledonia, and Bactrocera neoxanthodes in Vanuatu, and a species not yet described from Samoa. Distribution The SPC Pacific Fruit Fly Project records seven species in Fiji (http://www.spc.int/lrd/country-profiles/fiji ): The distribution of the Fiji fruit flies elsewhere in the Pacific is: Bactrocera kirki: American Samoa, French Polynesia (not Marquesas), Niue, Fiji (Rotuma), Samoa, Tonga, and Wallis and Futuna.