DOCSLIB.ORG

Working Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Working Paper Working Paper No. 34 / November 2012 Reviewing Member States’ Commitment to the European External Action Service Abstract Based on interviews with diplomats from a representative cross-section of nine member states and members of the EEAS itself, the research findings of this EPIN Working Paper confirm long-standing traditions and member state perceptions of cooperation with European institutions. The paper also reveals new aspects of the intergovernmental method of foreign policy shaping and making in the European Union; in particular how different national positions can positively or negatively affect the consolidation of the EEAS and the role of the EU as an international actor. As such, the Working Paper makes an original contribution to the existing literature on one of most discussed actors in the European Union’s post-Lisbon architecture in the domain of EU external action. EPIN Working Papers present analyses of key issues raised by the debate on the political integration of Europe. The European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN) is a network of think tanks and policy institutes based throughout Europe, which focuses on current EU political and policy debates (see back cover for more information). Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any of the institutions with which they are associated. ISBN: 978-94-6138-245-0 Available for free downloading from the CEPS (http://www.ceps.eu) and EPIN (http://www.epin.org) websites © Copyright 2012, EPIN & CEPS Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................ i Steven Blockmans Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... ii Jackie West and Steven Blockmans France and the EEAS: A give-and-take relationship ..................................................................... 1 Vivien Pertusot From co-founder to wait-and-see: Germany’s policy on the European External Action Service . 9 Almut Möller and Julian Rappold Deliberate ‘spoiler’ or misunderstood pragmatist? Britain and the European External Action Service ..................................................................................................................... 14 Edward Burke The European External Action Service fails to impress the Dutch: Will it bring added influence? ............................................................................................. 19 Louise van Schaik Europeanising National Diplomacies: The Case of Romania ..................................................... 26 Paul Ivan The Europeanisation of External Representation: The Case of Sweden ..................................... 31 Fredrik Langdal Foreign Policy in Times of Crisis: The View from Portugal ...................................................... 37 Maria João Seabra The Impact of the European External Action Service on Spanish Diplomacy ........................... 41 Ignacio Molina & Alicia Sorroza European External Action Service: A view from Estonia ........................................................... 47 Elina Viilup Glossary of terms and abbreviations ........................................................................................... 56 Annexe I: Questionnaire used as basis for research .................................................................... 57 Preface he foreign affairs ministers of 12 EU member states (Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) Tco-signed an open letter to the High Representative on 8 December 2011 to identify glitches in the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service (EEAS). This letter touched on the neglect of security affairs by the High Representative (HR) and pointed to the need to improve management and administrative procedures within the Service and the cooperation with the European Commission. Among other things, it called on the High Representative to circulate a yearly agenda, to produce regular preparatory policy and decision- making papers sufficiently in advance of the meetings, to set up a secure communications network and to optimise the identification of political priorities. Member states’ diplomats maintained that the letter was not meant as a criticism but as a constructive proposal, ahead of the High Representative’s report in the framework of the service review foreseen for mid-2013. In her own report on the first year of EEAS operations, submitted to the Parliament, the Council and the Commission on 22 December 2011, the HR denied the existence of systemic problems in cooperation with the Commission, while agreeing that the EEAS needed to stand on its own feet in administrative terms. The HR pledged to do more on security issues but indicated that EU member states were not doing their bit to help her put new systems in place. Indeed, given the limited resources available to the EEAS, support from member states services is key. This EPIN Working Paper explores several aspects of the role played by member states in the setting-up, organisation and functioning of the EEAS. This is a topical issue, and one that is currently the subject of a study commissioned by the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET), to be published in March 2013. The findings of this EPIN Working Paper, outlined in the Executive Summary, offer an independent preview into the attitudes of member states towards cooperation with the EEAS. Based on semi-structured interviews conducted with diplomats and civil servants of a representative cross-section of nine member states (France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Romania, Sweden, Portugal, Spain and Estonia) and members of the EEAS itself, research focused on member states’ influence on the creation of the EEAS, the impact of the new Service on EU member states’ diplomatic structures at the strategic and organisational levels (internal organisation, national diplomatic resources in third countries and international organisations), and the scope for synergies between national diplomacies and the EEAS on designated topics or in specific regions. The answers to the questionnaire (in annexe to this Working Paper) formed the starting point for the development of the papers written by research fellows of leading European think tanks, and carried out within the EPIN network. Initiated by project leaders Paul Ivan (previously at CEPS), Ignacio Molina and Alicia Sorroza (both at Elcano) this EPIN Working Paper both confirms long-standing traditions in and perceptions of member state cooperation with EU institutions, and unearths novelties in the intergovernmental method of foreign policy shaping and making in the European Union, in particular how different national positions can positively or negatively affect the consolidation of the EEAS and the role of the EU as an international actor. As such, this EPIN Working Paper makes an original contribution to the existing literature on one of most discussed actors in the European Union’s post-Lisbon architecture in the domain of EU external action. Steven Blockmans Senior Research Fellow and Head of the EU Foreign Policy unit, Centre for European Policy Studies. | i Executive Summary ember states’ views of the European External Action Service (EEAS) converge and diverge on a number of themes explored in this Working Paper, such as the need for Mthe Service, the response in national foreign ministries to its creation and performance so far, and what needs to be done differently to ensure the future success of the EEAS. What all nine member states covered by this study share is an interest in seeing the European Union emerge as a stronger player on the world stage. As the Swedish government put it in its parliamentary declaration of 2007, it would like to see the European Union be “a force in the service of peace, freedom and reconciliation.” Indeed, this goal was behind the Lisbon Treaty’s objectives for the creation of the EEAS in 2010; namely to enhance the coherence, effectiveness and visibility of EU external action and to combat the lack of synergy between national diplomacies of member states. Equally, in times of economic crisis, some member states see considerable merit in pooling resources and making cost savings by attributing additional tasks to the EEAS, especially in the areas of defence and consular services. Yet these hopes have been mitigated from the outset by the tension, indeed the paradox, between the desire to see the EEAS succeed in its mission and the will to protect and promote long-standing national interests in the field of foreign policy. This inherent tension is less apparent in the accounts provided by smaller member states such as the Netherlands, Sweden and Estonia than those from France and the UK, for example, with the latter stating: British diplomats believe that the EEAS is well-placed to complement the UK’s foreign policy objectives in a manner that is entirely consistent with the British government’s pledge not to cede more powers to Brussels. And from France: According to a French diplomat, the approach to the EEAS is akin to a love-hate relationship. After having pushed for its creation, France complains constantly about its functioning now. This attitude replicates patterns rooted in debates over Europeanisation versus national sovereignty. There
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, July-August 1982
    congress owmgb m uenirdi Hmericd Service Jo JULY/AUGUST 1982 The Press & Foreign Policy On October 20, 1980, Fortune Magazine devoted tlpe activities. VISA checking and card services are pro¬ major part of six pages to a description of the revo¬ vided by Bank One of Columbus, N.A. lutionary Merrill Lynch Cash Management Account financial service that lets you control your money If you've often wished that you could use some of in these five ways: the capital invested in securities without selling them, or been irritated at seeing interest, dividends 1. Your funds are virtually never idle. Any cash is or uninvested capital sitting idly in a brokerage automatically invested to earn daily compounded account, earning little or no income—you owe it dividends at current money market rates. You may to yourself to investigate the Cash Management elect to invest in the CMA™iMoney Fund, Thx-Exempt Account financial service. Fund or Government Securities Fund. It's a major step forward in financial services and 2. While Merrill Lynch is not a bank, you have instant it's exclusively Merrill Lynch's. And now it is available access to all your invested cash at any time any¬ to anyone with investments and/or cash totaling where in the world just by writing a check. $20,000 or more 3. You have immediate access to a line of credit based upon the value of your securities. 4. You receive a special VIS/fcard that is accepted in 152 countries and is different from any you now have.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvey Leifert's
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project HARVEY LEIFERT Interviewed by: Mark Tauber Initial interview date: June 18, 2018 Copyright 2021 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Manhattan, New York, 1938 Graduated from Bronx High School of Science 1955 BA in Political Science, Columbia University 1955–1959 MA in International Relations, Columbia University 1959–1961 Internship with Voice of America (Worldwide English Division) 1962 Teacher at San Francisco State College 1962–1965 Entered the Foreign Service 1965 A-100 Training United States Information Agency (USIA) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia—USIA, Junior Officer (in training) 1966–1967 USIA in Ethiopia—rotating through the sections Escort Officer for Langston Hughes Haile Selassie—Emperor in Ethiopia, God in Jamaica Introduction to Ethiopian Food Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso—USIA, Information Officer 1967–1968 Acting Public Affairs Officer Inspection Ouagadougou—isolated, but not unpleasant The saga of the swimming pool Travels to Europe Washington D.C., United States—Consultations 1968–1968 Port-au-Prince, Haiti—USIA, Cultural Affairs Officer 1968–1970 USIA Haiti A moon rock for Papa Doc Duvalier Personal highlight—married in Haiti 1 “Resignation” Washington D.C., United States—Voice of America 1970–1973 “Independent” news Not allowed to broadcast in the U.S. Fast tracked to citizenship (wife) Copenhagen, Denmark—USIA, Information Officer 1973–1975 Language training: Danish Two superpowers and a cemetery Outreach about Vietnam—Danish newspapers
    [Show full text]
  • The Armenian Revolution
    The Armenian Revolution: An Unfinished Cable provides an analysis of the political situation and the causes of mass protests in Armenia in the spring of 2018, which led to the change of political power in that country. THE ARMENIAN REVOLUTION The author describes the mechanisms of the formation of the post­Soviet model of the state in Armenia and the process of growing social discontent. He reports in detail the course of revolutionary events as seen through the eyes of Western diplomats stationed in Yerevan. The study notes the successes of the new political team in reforming the country, as well as the difficulties it AN UNFINISHED CABLE has experienced due, among others, to the resistance of the old economic and political structures. The author analyzes the geopolitical context of the reform process in Armenia. He takes into account the factor of the conflict in Nagorno­Karabakh and its possible settlement. The essay deals with the possible impact of the events in Armenia on the development of the situation in other post­Soviet countries. Piotr A. Świtalski The final part contains suggestions and recommendations regarding the European Union’s policy and Poland’s activities in the region, and towards Armenia in particular. Piotr Antoni Świtalski (born 1957) is a career Polish diplomat holding the rank of titular ambassador. He was Head of the Delegation of the European Union to Armenia with the rank and title of ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary (2015–2019), Under­ secretary of state (deputy foreign minister) at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2005), Permanent Representative of Poland to the Council of Europe (2005–2010), The Polish Institute of International director for policy planning at the Council Affairs (PISM) is a leading Central of Europe (2010–2014), director of the European think tank that positions Department of Foreign Policy Planning itself between the world of politics and at MFA (2002–2005), director of the Asia independent analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Read More > About an Uncertain Future: Regional Responses To
    AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE Regional Responses to Iran’s Nuclear Programme Shashank Joshi and Michael Stephens Royal United Services Institute WHITEHALL REPORT 4-13 First Published December 2013 © The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the Royal United Services Institute. Whitehall Report Series ISSN 1750-9432 About the Programme The Nuclear Analysis Programme at RUSI carries out comprehensive research, convenes expert discussions and holds public conferences on various contemporary aspects of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. The programme focuses primarily on national and international nuclear policy and strategy. Particular attention is paid to UK nuclear weapons policy, the future of international disarmament efforts, Korean Peninsula security, and the implications of a nuclear Iran. This Whitehall Report has been made possible by a grant from the MacArthur Foundation. About RUSI The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) is an independent think tank engaged in cutting edge defence and security research. A unique institution, founded in 1831 by the Duke of Wellington, RUSI embodies nearly two centuries of forward thinking, free discussion and careful reflection on defence and security matters. For more information, please visit: www.rusi.org About Whitehall Reports Whitehall Reports are available as part of a membership package, or individually at £10.00 plus p&p (£2.00 in the UK/£4.00 overseas). Orders should be sent to the Membership Administrator, RUSI Membership Office, Whitehall, London, SW1A 2ET, United Kingdom and cheques made payable to RUSI.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, November 2016
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION NOVEMBER 2016 FULBRIGHT AND THE FOREIGN SERVICE TURKEYS AT THE BORDER FOREIGN SERVICE November 2016 Volume 93, No. 9 20 Cover Story 20 Fulbright Program at 70: The Foreign Service Connection Members of the Foreign Service, some of them Fulbright alumni, play a crucial role in the continuing success of this singular U.S. exchange program. By Jerome Sherman and James Lawrence Focus on Foreign Service Authors 28 In Their Own Write We are pleased to present this year’s roundup of books by Foreign Service members and their families. By Susan B. Maitra 40 Of Related Interest Here is a short list of other 2016 28 titles of interest to diplomats. THE FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL | NOVEMBER 2016 5 FOREIGN SERVICE Departments 10 Letters Perspectives 13 Talking Points 7 78 63 In Memory President’s Views Local Lens 70 Books Championing American Diplomacy Chennai, India By Barbara Stephenson By Ed Malcik 9 Letter from the Editor Sharing Your Stories By Shawn Dorman 17 15 Speaking Out Getting Beyond Bureaucratese— Why Writing Like Robots Damages Marketplace U.S. Interests By Paul Poletes 71 Classifieds 77 74 Real Estate Reflections Turkeys Parade at the Border 76 Index to Advertisers By Victoria Hess 78 AFSA NEWS THE OFFICIAL RECORD OF THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION 54 Notes from LM: What Not to Say at the Office Holiday Party 55 Agreement Reached on 2013 MSI Remedies 56 Call for AFSA Award Nominations 56 Sinclaire Language Award Nominations 57 FAM Updates: Resources for New Parents 57 Forum Discusses the Carter Administration’s PD Policy 58 Apply Now for AFSA College Scholarships 59 Combined Federal Campaign: A Great Way to 51 Support AFSA 60 Governing Board Meeting Minutes 51 Washington Nationals Honor the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide Produced and Distributed By
    Cold War Teacher’s Guide Produced and Distributed by: www.MediaRichLearning.com AMERICA IN THE 20TH CENTURY: THE COLD WAR TEACHER’S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Materials in Unit .................................................... 3 Introduction to the Series .................................................... 3 Introduction to the Program .................................................... 3 Standards .................................................... 6 Instructional Notes .................................................... 7 Suggested Instructional Procedures .................................................... 7 Student Objectives .................................................... 7 Follow-Up Activities .................................................... 8 Answer Key .................................................... 10 Script of Video Narration .................................................... 17 Blackline Masters .................................................... 45 Media Rich Learning .................................................... 72 PAGE 2 OF 105 MEDIA RICH LEARNING AMERICA IN THE 20TH CENTURY: THE COLD WAR Materials in the Unit • The video program The Cold War • Teachers Guide This teacher's guide has been prepared to aid the teacher in utilizing materials contained within this program. In addition to this introductory material, the guide contains suggested instructional procedures for the lesson, answer keys for the activity sheets, and follow-up activities and projects for the lesson. • Blackline Masters Included
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICA Larar] APRIL 1978 MO U 2 1978
    VOLUME XI NUMBER 3 SOUTHERN $1 thwUni versity AFRICA Larar] APRIL 1978 MO u 2 1978 E C LU 1\ \ r 'South' African- cKb VVls -- J c, A ALSO: Edging Closer Israel and South Africa .ERITREA Lome SEYCHELLESIS. COMOROis. MALAGASY REPUBLIC Mbabane Contents SOUTHERN Af RICA General Motors 2 CONFIDENTIAL APRIL 1978 South African Ltd. DIPLOMATIC CABLE VOLUME Xl NUMBER 3 REVEALS BLACK HOSTILITY TO U.S. INVESTMENT . A m TK IN SOUTH AFRICA 3 SUBJECT: BLACK ATTITUDES TOWARDS Our Collective: FOREIGN INVESTMENT Barbara Barnes Carol Benglesdorf WesCohen PaddyColligan Jennifer 6 EDGING CLOSER Davis Michael Davis Charlie Ebel ISRAEL AND SOUTH AFRICA Mimi Edmunds Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban Peggy Halsey Janet Hooper Paul Irish 8 ZIMBABWE Tami Hultman Allen Isaacman Bill 8 RUNNING OUT OF GUNS AND BUTTER Johnston Marci Kerr Richard Knight 8 MILITARY SITUATION Reed Kramer Patrick Lawrence 8 ECONOMIC TROUBLES Richard Leonard Richard Lobban 11 A SETTLEMENT FOR THE SETTLERS Edgar Lockwood Andy Marx Bill 13 SOUTH AFRICA Minter Ruth Minter Susan Rogers 13 REGROUPING FORCES IN SOWETO Christine Root Karen Rothmyer Mike 13 ROBERT MANGALISO SOBUKWE Shuster Janet Siskind JinniStroman John Stroman Stephanie Urdang 20 NAMIBIA Roberta Washington Jim Weikart 20 SOUTH AFRICA WALKS OUT OF TALKS Sybil Wong 22 THINGS STAY THE SAME SAYS BISHOP 23 UNITED STATES 23 CORPORATE GIANTS WHO AID SOUTH AFRICA 24 WASHINGTON NOTES 26 GOLD RUSH IN PROGRESS Southern Africa is published monthly, 26 ANGOLA except for July-August, when bi-monthly, 26 RENEWED HOSTILITIES PROVOKE PROTEST by the Southern Africa Committee, 156 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 28 MOZAMBIQUE 28 MOZAMBIQUE AND TANZANIA Subscriptions: Individual (domestic and BUILD COOPERATION foreign)/$8.00; Institutional/$18.00; Air mail: Africa, Asia, Europe/$20.50; South 15 OVERVIEW and Central America/$17.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 216.62 Kb
    Lebanon Against Itself (Again) Marc J. Sirois February 4, 2011 Search MERIP (Marc J. Sirois is a Canadian journalist based in Beirut since 1997.) Middle East Report The year 2011 has brought For background on the Tribunal, see Lebanon’s political tug of war Heiko Wimmen, “The Long, Steep Fall of Online Subject Index the Lebanon Tribunal ,” Middle East into the streets again, with Report Online , December 1, 2010. thousands of protesters burning Afghanistan and tires and blocking roads over the apparent failure of their Pakistan candidate to secure the office of prime minister. But months of Algeria hype to the contrary, this time the raucous demonstrations were Arab and Muslim Subscribe Online to Americans Middle East Report not staged by Hizballah and its allies in the March 8 coalition so named after a day of protests in 2005 designed to “thank” Syria Arabian Peninsula before its withdrawal of forces from Lebanon. Instead, the protests Egypt were mounted by the rival March 14 alliance, so named for the Elections Order a subscription and day of “Syria out!” rallies that followed less than a week later. Europe and the back issues to the award- Middle East winning magazine Middle East Report . The protests erupted on the evening of January 25 after news From the Editors Horn of Africa Click here for the order reports made it clear that a majority in Parliament would side page. against the incumbent premier, billionaire Saad al-Hariri, whose Human Rights fractious “national unity” government collapsed on January 12 International after more than a third of its ministers resigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Guantanamo
    JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS of the COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 71-370_text_CX.indd i 3/23/12 8:55 AM ….we have been very selective in terms of returning people. One of the things we have discovered over time is that we are not particularly good at predicting which returnee will be a recidivist. Some of those that we have considered the most dangerous and who have been released or who we considered dangerous and potentially going back into the fi ght have not, and some that we evaluated as SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT GATES not being much of a danger or much of a risk FEBRUARY 17, 2011 we have discovered in the fi ght.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Inflection Points: Agenda Setting and American Foreign Policy toward Islamist Groups Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00x9c4r2 Author Halvorson, Leah Amelia Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Inflection Points: Agenda Setting and American Foreign Policy toward Islamist Groups A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Leah Amelia Halvorson 2013 Copyright by Leah Amelia Halvorson 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Inflection Points: Agenda Setting and American Foreign Policy toward Islamist Groups by Leah Amelia Halvorson Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles 2013 Professor Steven L. Spiegel, Chair This dissertation addresses why U.S. foreign policy toward Islamist groups has varied over time. Although recent scholarship has improved our understanding of how non-state actors, particularly terrorist groups, operate, not enough work has attempted to understand how states devise policies toward non-state actors. It builds on previous work to go beyond analyzing U.S. policy toward the broad concept of “Political Islam”, and instead addresses U.S. policy over time and toward specific groups. I examine two militant and two nonmilitant case studies: the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinian Hamas, and Lebanese Hezbollah. Employing John Kingdon’s garbage can model of agenda setting, I argue that variation in U.S. policy toward these groups is a function of policy entrepreneurs linking a new solution (ranging from engagement to confrontation) to a problem (the Islamist group) in the context of policy windows of opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Capital in the Interagency Environment of Iraq
    Social Capital in the Interagency Environment of Iraq by Lynne Chandler-Garcia ommenting on the mission during his deployment as the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker stated, “Iraq is so complex, the challenge is so large, and the stakes are so great, that this effort obviously cannot be a military effort alone. It cannot be a State Department Ceffort alone. You’ve got to bring everybody in.”1 As the mission transitioned to stability operations and the military prepared to draw down, this was certainly true. The focus was on handing over the residual mission to the State Department and turning most operations over to the Iraqis. Military service members and diplomats worked hand-in-hand to synchronize their efforts and accomplish these transitions. What was remarkable about the final phases of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) was the high level of cooperation among military members and officials from the State Department both within the headquarters and in the field. From the start of OIF and throughout much of the mission, U.S. officials struggled with joint military-civilian operations. However, by the latter stages of stability operations, the interagency effort had dramatically improved. It seemed as if the joint effort was finally “clicking.” The difference in the interagency relationship when OIF began in 2003 compared to the final years was astounding. What accounted for this change? I posit that the primary reason for the improved interagency effort were the partnerships military officials and diplomats established that facilitated their working relationships and allowed both sides to benefit from one another’s strengths.
    [Show full text]