DOCSLIB.ORG

Leaving Guantanamo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leaving Guantanamo JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM JANUARY 2012 HASC COMMITTEE PRINT 112-4 2120 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 202.225.4151 ARMEDSERVICES.HOUSE.GOV LEAVING GUANTANAMO LEAVING As of September 2011, the LEAVING U.S. government believed that 27 percent of former GTMO detainees were confi rmed or suspected to have been engaged GUANTANAMO in terrorist or insurgent activities. POLICIES, PRESSURES, AND DETAINEES RETURNING TO THE FIGHT SUSPECTED OR CONFIRMED HASC 71-370_cover.indd 1 3/14/12 12:44 PM SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS of the COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 71-370_text_CX.indd i 3/23/12 8:55 AM ….we have been very selective in terms of returning people. One of the things we have discovered over time is that we are not particularly good at predicting which returnee will be a recidivist. Some of those that we have considered the most dangerous and who have been released or who we considered dangerous and potentially going back into the fi ght have not, and some that we evaluated as SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ROBERT GATES not being much of a danger or much of a risk FEBRUARY 17, 2011 we have discovered in the fi ght. Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing “A Statement by the United States Government,” New York Times, April 24, 2011 (issued in connection with the decision by the newspaper and other organizations to publish documents obtained illegally by Wikileaks). Both the previous and the current Administrations have made every eff ort to act with the utmost care and diligence in transferring detainees from Guantanamo. Both Administrations have made the protection of American citizens the top priority and . we will continue to work with allies and partners around the world to mitigate threats to the U.S. and other countries . GEOFF MORRELL PENTAGON PRESS SECRETARY AMBASSADOR DANIEL FRIED SPECIAL ENVOY FOR CLOSURE OF THE GUANTANAMO DETENTION FACILITY II LEAVING GUANTANAMO 71-370_text_CX.indd ii 3/23/12 8:56 AM Contents 02 Executive Summary and Introduction 04 Methodological and Stylistic Notes 06 Snapshots of Reengagement 10 Reengagement: The Basics 13 Defi nitions 16 FINDING 1: Mechanisms to reduce the GTMO population were fi rst contemplated when the facility was established in 2002. However, procedures to accomplish this took about eight months to fi nalize, and were spurred by persistent concerns that some detainees should not be held. 23 FINDING 2: After the fi rst review process began, political and diplomatic pressures to reduce the GTMO population arose, resulting in releases and transfers. 27 Russia 31 Foreign Prosecution 33 Pakistan 34 Saudi Rehabilitation Program 42 FINDING 3: Pressure to reduce the GTMO population accelerated in the second Bush term, before reengagement dangers became fully apparent. 50 Success Story? 57 Litigation Pressures 64 FINDING 4: While the GTMO transfer and release process instituted by the Obama administration diff ered in some important respects from what preceded it, there are suffi cient continuities so that the threat of reengagement may not be lessened in the long term. 74 Conclusion and Recommendations 76 Dissenting Views 86 Appendix Classifi ed Annex UNDER SEPARATE COVER HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 01 71-370_text_CX.indd 01 3/23/12 8:56 AM Executive Summary and Introduction In March 2011, Chairman Howard P. “Buck” McKeon and Ranking Minority Member Adam Smith directed the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee to undertake an in-depth, comprehensive bipartisan investigation of procedures to dispatch detainees from the Guantanamo Bay detention facility (GTMO) over the past decade. Th is necessarily included an examination of mechanisms intended to prevent former detainees from reengaging in terror-related activities. In conducting this study, committee staff travelled to eleven countries, interviewed nearly every senior offi cial directly involved in these matters in both the Bush and Obama administra- tions, received briefi ngs from the Department of Defense and Department of State, consulted with eighteen subject matter experts, met with two former detainees, and reviewed thousands of pages of classifi ed and unclassifi ed documents. Subcommittee Members convened a hearing, three Member briefi ngs (including one that was classifi ed), and travelled to several relevant locations. Th is report fi nds that the Bush and Obama administrations, in reaction to domestic political pressures, a desire to earn goodwill abroad, and in an attempt to advance strategic national security goals, sought to “release” or “transfer” GTMO detainees elsewhere. Th ose “released” were judged a suffi ciently low threat that they were sent to countries with no expectation of follow up. “Transferred” detainees, because they were assessed as relatively more dangerous, were conveyed with the expectation that some process would be applied in the receiving nation to mitigate the threat they potentially posed. Despite earnest and well-meaning eff orts by offi cials in both administrations, properly evaluating detainees and ensuring that their cases were handled appropriately by receiving countries was, and remains, a challenge. Th is is demonstrated by the fact that the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) estimated in September 2011 that 27% of the 600 former detainees who have left GTMO were confi rmed or suspected to be presently or previ- ously reengaged in terrorist or insurgent activities. Th is total percentage has consistently increased. Furthermore, the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence noted in 2010 that the Intelligence Community “assesses that if addition- al detainees are transferred from GTMO, some of them will reengage in terrorist or insurgent activities.” Five of 66 detainees who left GTMO in the 20 months between February 2009 and 02 LEAVING GUANTANAMO 71-370_text_CX.indd 02 3/23/12 8:56 AM October 2010 are confi rmed (two) or suspected (three) by ODNI of involvement in terrorist or insurgent activities. Although two of the fi ve were released pursuant to court orders, this nonetheless yields a seven and one half percent reengagement rate. Although it is diffi cult to compare two disparate groups of former detainees (a smaller pool which left GTMO relatively recently and a much larger pool which has been gone for a much longer period), the reengage- ment rate indicates that challenges remain. Th is report posits four fi ndings: • Finding 1. Mechanisms to reduce the GTMO population were fi rst contemplated when the facility was established in 2002. However, procedures to accomplish this took about eight months to fi nalize, and were spurred by persistent concerns that some detainees should not be held. • Finding 2. After the fi rst review process began, political and diplomatic pressures to reduce the GTMO population arose, resulting in releases and transfers. • Finding 3. Pressure to reduce the GTMO population accelerated in the second Bush term, before reengagement dangers became fully apparent. • Finding 4. While the GTMO transfer and release process instituted by the Obama ad- ministration diff ered in some important respects from what preceded it, there are suffi cient continuities so that the threat of reengagement may not be lessened in the long term. In addition to chapters discussing each fi nding in depth, this report includes several compan- ion articles illustrating specifi c issues. A classifi ed section sets forth material which cannot be reproduced here. Th e following recommendations are off ered: • Th e Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence collaborate to produce a report (in classifi ed and unclassifi ed versions) to congressional committees of jurisdiction assessing factors causing or contributing to reengagement; including a discussion of trends, by country and region, where reengagement has occurred; • Th e Department of Defense and Department of State produce a report (in classifi ed and unclassifi ed versions) to congressional committees of jurisdiction assessing the eff ectiveness of agreements in each country where transfers have occurred; • Congress continue the certifi cation requirements on GTMO transfers which are contained in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. No. 112-81; 125 Stat. 1561 [2011]), at least until receiving and reviewing the specifi ed reports; and • Additional action as outlined in the classifi ed annex. HOUSE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 03 71-370_text_CX.indd 03 3/23/12 8:56 AM Methodological and Stylistic Notes Th is study is based primarily upon 19 interviews with current and past key policy makers and staff ers from the White House, the Department of Defense, and the Department of State, as well as hundreds of pages of declassifi ed documents, and some secondary sources. A large vol- ume of classifi ed information provided to the committee was also evaluated. Th at data forms, in part, the basis of a classifi ed annex to this report. In addition to visiting the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, committee staff traveled to eleven countries where detainees have been sent and met with U.S. and foreign government offi cials, representatives of non-governmental organizations, and two former detainees. Staff also received briefi ngs from the Department of State, the Department of Defense (and several components including the Defense Intelligence Agency), as well as many groups and individuals knowledgeable about detainee disposition matters. Th e Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee convened one hearing and three briefi ngs (including one classi- fi ed briefi ng), and Members travelled to Afghanistan and Pakistan and GTMO for meetings and fi rst-hand observations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guantanamo's Hidden History
    Guantanamo’s Hidden History Shocking statistics of starvation June 2009 1 Author: Andy Worthington Copyright © 2009 Cageprisoners All rights reserved. Cageprisoners 27 Old Gloucester Street London WC1N 3XX Telephone: 00 (44) 7973264197 Email: [email protected] 2 INTRODUCTION Today is the third anniversary of the deaths in Guantánamo of three prisoners, Ali al-Salami, Mani al-Utaybi and Yasser al-Zahrani. The anniversary comes just two weeks after the second anniversary of the death of Abdul Rahman al-Amri, the fourth prisoner to die in mysterious circumstances, and just eight days after the death of a fifth prisoner, Muhammad Salih. The authorities maintain that the men died by committing suicide, although doubts about this explanation have repeatedly been voiced by former prisoners. However, it is also significant that all five men were long-term hunger strikers. Cageprisoners is marking this sad anniversary with a brief report about the Guantánamo hunger strikers, and the dreadful toll that prolonged starvation -- and brutal force-feeding, which is the response of the US military -- exacts on prisoners held, for the most part, without charge or trial in a seemingly endless legal limbo. Force-feeding involves prisoners being strapped into a restraint chair and force-fed twice daily against their will, through an agonizing process that involves having a tube inserted into the stomach through the nose. As Clive Stafford Smith, the lawyer for several dozen Guantánamo prisoners, explained in the Los Angeles Times in 2007, with reference to Sami al-Haj, who was released in May 2008, “Medical ethics tell us that you cannot force-feed a mentally competent hunger striker, as he has the right to complain about his mistreatment, even unto death.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council by Its Resolutions 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2006/120 27 February 2006 Original: ENGLISH COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Sixty-second session Items 10 and 11 of the provisional agenda ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS Situation of detainees at Guantánamo Bay Report of the Chairperson-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Leila Zerrougui; the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro Despouy; the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak; the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Asma Jahangir; and the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Paul Hunt Summary The present joint report is submitted by five holders of mandates of special procedures of the Commission on Human Rights who have been jointly following the situation of detainees held at the United States of America Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay since June 2004. Section I provides a legal analysis common to all five mandates. Sections II to V outline the legal framework specific to each mandate, as well as the particular allegations of human rights violations which concern them. The final section contains conclusions and recommendations. GE.06-11276 (E) 170306 E/CN.4/2006/120 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 - 5 4 I. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................... 6 - 16 5 A. Human rights and counter-terrorism measures ................ 6 - 7 5 B. The obligations of the United States of America under international law ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airat Vakhitov, Agreed to Speak with Human Rights Watch, He Said, Because He Felt the Story of the Russian Detainees’ Experiences Back Home Had Not Yet Been Told.2
    March 2007 Volume 19, No. 2(D) The “Stamp of Guantanamo” The Story of Seven Men Betrayed by Russia’s Diplomatic Assurances to the United States Map of Russia .......................................................................................................... 1 Summary .................................................................................................................2 Recommendations to the US government............................................................4 Recommendations to the Russian government....................................................5 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 6 Background..............................................................................................................7 US Refoulement to Russia: A Violation of the Prohibition against Torture ..............10 Diplomatic Assurances...................................................................................... 11 The Risk of Torture and Ill-Treatment in Russia................................................... 14 Return to Russia.....................................................................................................19 Post-Return Abuses by Russia................................................................................21 Torture and Ill-Treatment...................................................................................22 Rasul Kudaev...............................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1
    Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 2 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties BENS Practitioners Panel Michael Allen Thomas Kean Former Majority Staff Director House Perma- Chair, The National Commission on Terrorist nent Select Committee on Intelligence United Attacks Upon the United States States House of Representatives Former Governor of New Jersey Alfred Berkeley Michael Leiter Vice Chair National Infrastructure Advisory Former Director of the National Counterter- Council rorism Center Former President NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Joseph Lieberman Michael Chertoff (Vice Chair) Former United States Senator (CT) Former Secretary of Homeland Security Former Chairman Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Commissioner Edward Davis United States Senate Former Commissioner, Boston Police Department James Locher Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Robert Graham (Vice Chair) Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict Former Governor of Florida Former Chairman Senate Select Committee Steven McCraw (Vice Chair) on Intelligence United States Senate Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor David Hall of Texas Director Missouri Information and Analysis Center Norton Schwartz (Chair) President & CEO Business Executives Lee Hamilton for National Security Former United States Representative (IN) Vice Chair The National Commission Maurice Sonnenberg on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Former Member President’s Intelligence Advisory Board Michael Hayden Vice Chair Report of the National Former Director CIA Commission on Terrorism Former Director NSA Frances Townsend Brian Michael Jenkins Former Assistant to the President for Home- Senior Advisor to the President RAND land Security and Counterterrorism Corporation Juan Zarate Loch K.
    [Show full text]
  • Consejo Económico Y Social
    NACIONES UNIDAS E Consejo Económico Distr. GENERAL y Social E/CN.4/2006/120 27 de febrero de 2006 ESPAÑOL Original: INGLÉS COMISIÓN DE DERECHOS HUMANOS 62º período de sesiones Temas 10 y 11 del programa provisional LOS DERECHOS ECONÓMICOS, SOCIALES Y CULTURALES LOS DERECHOS CIVILES Y POLÍTICOS Situación de los detenidos en la bahía de Guantánamo Informe de la Presidenta-Relatora del Grupo de Trabajo sobre la Detención Arbitraria, Leila Zerrougui; del Relator Especial sobre la independencia de los magistrados y abogados, Leandro Despouy; del Relator Especial sobre la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantes, Manfred Nowak; de la Relatora Especial sobre la libertad de religión o de creencias, Asma Jahangir; y del Relator Especial sobre el derecho de toda persona al disfrute del más alto nivel posible de salud física y mental, Paul Hunt GE.06-11279 (S) 230306 280306 E/CN.4/2006/120 página 2 Resumen Presentan este informe conjunto cinco titulares de mandatos de los procedimientos especiales de la Comisión de Derechos Humanos que, desde junio de 2004, han seguido conjuntamente la situación de las personas detenidas en la base naval de los Estados Unidos de América en la bahía de Guantánamo. En la sección I se lleva a cabo un análisis jurídico común a los cinco mandatos. En las secciones II a V se describe el marco jurídico específico de cada mandato y se formulan las alegaciones de violaciones de los derechos humanos de que se ocupa cada uno. En la última sección figuran las conclusiones y recomendaciones. E/CN.4/2006/120 página 3 ÍNDICE Párrafos Página INTRODUCCIÓN.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, Georgia and the Eu in Abkhazia and South Ossetia
    PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova August 2012 Figueroa Press Los Angeles The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and cannot be interpreted to reflect the positions of organizations that the author is affiliated with. PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION: RUSSIA, GEORGIA AND THE EU IN ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA Iskra Kirova Published by FIGUEROA PRESS 840 Childs Way, 3rd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90089 Phone: (213) 743-4800 Fax: (213) 743-4804 www.figueroapress.com Figueroa Press is a division of the USC Bookstore Copyright © 2012 all rights reserved Notice of Rights All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author, care of Figueroa Press. Notice of Liability The information in this book is distributed on an “As is” basis, without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, neither the author nor Figueroa nor the USC Bookstore shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any text contained in this book. Figueroa Press and the USC Bookstore are trademarks of the University of Southern California ISBN 13: 978-0-18-214016-9 ISBN 10: 0-18-214016-4 For general inquiries or to request additional copies of this paper please contact: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California 3502 Watt Way, G4 Los Angeles, CA 90089-0281 Tel: (213) 821-2078; Fax: (213) 821-0774 [email protected] www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy CPD Perspectives is a periodic publication by the USC Center on Public Diplomacy, and highlights scholarship intended to stimulate critical thinking about the study and practice of public diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • FOIA) Document Clearinghouse in the World
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com Received Received Request ID Requester Name Organization Closed Date Final Disposition Request Description Mode Date 17-F-0001 Greenewald, John The Black Vault PAL 10/3/2016 11/4/2016 Granted/Denied in Part I respectfully request a copy of records, electronic or otherwise, of all contracts past and present, that the DOD / OSD / JS has had with the British PR firm Bell Pottinger. Bell Pottinger Private (legally BPP Communications Ltd.; informally Bell Pottinger) is a British multinational public relations and marketing company headquartered in London, United Kingdom. 17-F-0002 Palma, Bethania - PAL 10/3/2016 11/4/2016 Other Reasons - No Records Contracts with Bell Pottinger for information operations and psychological operations. (Date Range for Record Search: From 01/01/2007 To 12/31/2011) 17-F-0003 Greenewald, John The Black Vault Mail 10/3/2016 1/13/2017 Other Reasons - Not a proper FOIA I respectfully request a copy of the Intellipedia category index page for the following category: request for some other reason Nuclear Weapons Glossary 17-F-0004 Jackson, Brian - Mail 10/3/2016 - - I request a copy of any available documents related to Army Intelligence's participation in an FBI counterintelligence source operation beginning in about 1959, per David Wise book, "Cassidy's Run," under the following code names: ZYRKSEEZ SHOCKER I am also interested in obtaining Army Intelligence documents authorizing, as well as policy documents guiding, the use of an Army source in an FBI operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper
    Working Paper No. 34 / November 2012 Reviewing Member States’ Commitment to the European External Action Service Abstract Based on interviews with diplomats from a representative cross-section of nine member states and members of the EEAS itself, the research findings of this EPIN Working Paper confirm long-standing traditions and member state perceptions of cooperation with European institutions. The paper also reveals new aspects of the intergovernmental method of foreign policy shaping and making in the European Union; in particular how different national positions can positively or negatively affect the consolidation of the EEAS and the role of the EU as an international actor. As such, the Working Paper makes an original contribution to the existing literature on one of most discussed actors in the European Union’s post-Lisbon architecture in the domain of EU external action. EPIN Working Papers present analyses of key issues raised by the debate on the political integration of Europe. The European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN) is a network of think tanks and policy institutes based throughout Europe, which focuses on current EU political and policy debates (see back cover for more information). Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any of the institutions with which they are associated. ISBN: 978-94-6138-245-0 Available for free downloading from the CEPS (http://www.ceps.eu) and EPIN (http://www.epin.org) websites © Copyright 2012, EPIN & CEPS Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................ i Steven Blockmans Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... ii Jackie West and Steven Blockmans France and the EEAS: A give-and-take relationship ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, July-August 1982
    congress owmgb m uenirdi Hmericd Service Jo JULY/AUGUST 1982 The Press & Foreign Policy On October 20, 1980, Fortune Magazine devoted tlpe activities. VISA checking and card services are pro¬ major part of six pages to a description of the revo¬ vided by Bank One of Columbus, N.A. lutionary Merrill Lynch Cash Management Account financial service that lets you control your money If you've often wished that you could use some of in these five ways: the capital invested in securities without selling them, or been irritated at seeing interest, dividends 1. Your funds are virtually never idle. Any cash is or uninvested capital sitting idly in a brokerage automatically invested to earn daily compounded account, earning little or no income—you owe it dividends at current money market rates. You may to yourself to investigate the Cash Management elect to invest in the CMA™iMoney Fund, Thx-Exempt Account financial service. Fund or Government Securities Fund. It's a major step forward in financial services and 2. While Merrill Lynch is not a bank, you have instant it's exclusively Merrill Lynch's. And now it is available access to all your invested cash at any time any¬ to anyone with investments and/or cash totaling where in the world just by writing a check. $20,000 or more 3. You have immediate access to a line of credit based upon the value of your securities. 4. You receive a special VIS/fcard that is accepted in 152 countries and is different from any you now have.
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Sentinel 2(5)
    MAY 2009 . VOL 2 . ISSUE 5 COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER AT WEST POINT CTC SENTINel OBJECTIVE . RELEVANT . RIGOROUS Contents Comparing the U.S. and Soviet FEATURE ARTICLE Experiences in Afghanistan 1 Comparing the U.S. and Soviet By Bruce Riedel Experiences in Afghanistan By Bruce Riedel REPORTS 4 Quetta: The Headquarters of the Afghan Taliban By Mukhtar A. Khan 7 Examining Saudi Arabia’s 85 Most Wanted List By Christopher Boucek 10 Revisiting Al-Qa`ida’s Anthrax Program By René Pita and Rohan Gunaratna 14 The Limits of Iranian Influence Among Gulf Shi`a By Laurence Louër 17 The Funding Methods of Bangladeshi Terrorist Groups By Paul Cochrane 20 Avoiding Suicide Terrorism in Bangladesh By Ryan Clarke and Shafqat Munir Soldiers with the 101st Division Special Troops Battalion, 101st Airborne. - Photo Courtesy of the U.S. Army 23 Recent Highlights in Terrorist Activity 28 CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts country rarely fights the United States is fighting a Taliban- the same war twice in one led insurgency in Afghanistan that generation, especially from operates from a safe haven in Pakistan. opposite sides. Yet that Many suggest that the outcome will be Ain many ways describes the U.S. role the same for the United States as it was in Afghanistan today. In the 1980s, for the Soviet Union—ultimate defeat at the Central Intelligence Agency, the hands of the insurgency. Pakistan’s working from a safe haven in Pakistan, role as a safe haven is remarkably engineered the largest covert operation consistent in both conflicts, but focusing About the CTC Sentinel in its history to help defeat the Soviet exclusively on that similarity misses th 1 The Combating Terrorism Center is an 40 Red Army in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Repealing the 1991 and 2002 Iraq War Authorizations Is Sound Policy Charles D
    LEGAL MEMORANDUM No. 256 | JANUARY 6, 2020 EDWIN MEESE III CENTER FOR LEGAL & JUDICIAL STUDIES Why Repealing the 1991 and 2002 Iraq War Authorizations Is Sound Policy Charles D. Stimson he Constitution’s allocation of war powers KEY TAKEAWAYS between the legislative and executive branches is a classic example of the sepa- T 1 The 1991 and 2002 AUMF Against Iraq ration of powers. The Congress has the power to Resolutions remain in force even though declare war but cannot fight the war on its own. The their purpose has been accomplished. President, as commander in chief of the Army and Navy, has (and has uniformly claimed) the authority to use military forces abroad in the absence of specific Repeal would not affect the 2001 AUMF, prior congressional approval.2 This authority derives the primary domestic statutory authority from his constitutional responsibility as commander for the war against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, in chief and chief executive for foreign and military ISIS, or associated forces. affairs. Without money from Congress, however, the President has no ability to fight those conflicts, nor Debating and repealing those war does he have the authority to appropriate funds to pay authorizations is a matter of congres- for those military conflicts on his own. sional hygiene and gets the Congress This tension between the legislative and executive back in the business of exercising its Article I muscles. branches was purposeful, as the Founders anticipated the grave significance of the country’s going to war. This paper, in its entirety, can be found at http://report.heritage.org/lm256 The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | (202) 546-4400 | heritage.org Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
    [Show full text]