Lessons from Fort Hood: Improving Our Ability to Connect the Dots
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scientific Games Announces CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair Frances Townsend to Give EMPOWER Conference Keynote Address
Scientific Games Announces CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair Frances Townsend To Give EMPOWER Conference Keynote Address February 15, 2017 10:05 AM ET LAS VEGAS, Feb. 15, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Scientific Games Corporation (NASDAQ: SGMS) ("Scientific Games" or the "Company") today announced that Frances Frago Townsend, CBS Senior National Security Analyst and Former Homeland Security Chair, will give the keynote address March 8 during the Company's EMPOWER customer conference at Planet Hollywood Las Vegas Resort & Casino on the Las Vegas Strip. The well-known and highly regarded homeland security expert and TV personality will address the more than 600 attendees at Scientific Games' EMPOWER conference, speaking on "Leading During Turbulent Times: Remembering the 5 C's." Townsend is currently Executive Vice President for Worldwide Government, Legal and Business Affairs at MacAndrews and Forbes Incorporated, wholly owned by Scientific Games Chairman of the Board Ronald O. Perelman. She works across MacAndrew's portfolio companies, focusing on international, legal, compliance and business development issues. Prior to that, she was a corporate partner with the law firm of Baker Botts, LLP. From 2004 to 2008, Townsend served as Assistant to President George W. Bush for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism and chaired the Homeland Security Council. She also served as Deputy National Security Advisor for Combatting Terrorism from May 2003 to May 2004. Townsend spent 13 years at the U.S. Department of Justice under the administrations of President George H. W. Bush, President Bill Clinton, and President George W. Bush. She has received numerous awards for her public service accomplishments. -
Fort Hood AFGE
2002 Negotiated Agreement Fort Hood “people first – mission always” “Working together Works” AFGE Proud to Make America Work American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO Local, 1920 INDEX PREAMBLE 1 ARTICLE 1 EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION AND COVERAGE OF AGREEMENT 2 ARTICLE 2 PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT 3 ARTICLE 3 SCOPE OF CONSULTATION AND NEGOTIATION 4 ARTICLE 4 MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 6 ARTICLE 5 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 7 ARTICLE 6 REPRESENTATION 9 ARTICLE 7 PUBLICITY 11 ARTICLE 8 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 12 ARTICLE 9 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION 16 ARTICLE 10 HOURS OF WORK 16 ARTICLE 11 OVERTIME 19 ARTICLE 12 HOLIDAYS 20 ARTICLE 13 LEAVE 22 ARTICLE 14 EMPLOYEE PERSONNEL FILES 25 ARTICLE 15 JOB CLASSIFICATION 26 ARTICLE 16 TRAINING 26 ARTICLE 17 REDUCTION IN FORCE, REORGANIZATION, AND/OR TRANSFER OF FUNCTION 27 ARTICLE 18 DISCIPLINARY AND ADVERSE ACTIONS 28 ARTICLE 19 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 30 ARTICLE 20 ARBITRATION 34 ARTICLE 21 HEALTH AND SAFETY 36 ARTICLE 22 ON THE JOB INJURIES 39 ARTICLE 23 DUES WITHHOLDING 41 ARTICLE 24 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP) AND WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PROGRAM (WVP) 43 ARTICLE 25 USE OF OFFICIAL FACILITIES 45 ARTICLE 26 MERIT PROMOTION 46 ARTICLE 27 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 48 ARTICLE 28 EMPLOYEE DEBTS 49 ARTICLE 29 INCENTIVE AWARDS 49 ARTICLE 30 ENVIRONMENTAL DIFFERENTIAL PAY 50 ARTICLE 31 FIREFIGHTERS 51 ARTICLE 32 GENERAL 53 ARTICLE 33 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES PROGRAM 53 ARTICLE 34 PARKING 53 ARTICLE 35 IMPASSES IN NEGOTIATIONS 54 ARTICLE 36 TRAVEL AND PER DIEM 54 ARTICLE 37 SCHEDULED WITHIN-GRADE -
Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1
Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 1 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties 2 Domestic Security: Confronting a Changing Threat to Ensure Public Safety and Civil Liberties BENS Practitioners Panel Michael Allen Thomas Kean Former Majority Staff Director House Perma- Chair, The National Commission on Terrorist nent Select Committee on Intelligence United Attacks Upon the United States States House of Representatives Former Governor of New Jersey Alfred Berkeley Michael Leiter Vice Chair National Infrastructure Advisory Former Director of the National Counterter- Council rorism Center Former President NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Joseph Lieberman Michael Chertoff (Vice Chair) Former United States Senator (CT) Former Secretary of Homeland Security Former Chairman Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Commissioner Edward Davis United States Senate Former Commissioner, Boston Police Department James Locher Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Robert Graham (Vice Chair) Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict Former Governor of Florida Former Chairman Senate Select Committee Steven McCraw (Vice Chair) on Intelligence United States Senate Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor David Hall of Texas Director Missouri Information and Analysis Center Norton Schwartz (Chair) President & CEO Business Executives Lee Hamilton for National Security Former United States Representative (IN) Vice Chair The National Commission Maurice Sonnenberg on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Former Member President’s Intelligence Advisory Board Michael Hayden Vice Chair Report of the National Former Director CIA Commission on Terrorism Former Director NSA Frances Townsend Brian Michael Jenkins Former Assistant to the President for Home- Senior Advisor to the President RAND land Security and Counterterrorism Corporation Juan Zarate Loch K. -
Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking
AP PHOTO/CHARLES DHARAPAK PHOTO/CHARLES AP Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 6 Findings 14 First-order questions for the next president 17 Best practices to consider 26 Policymaking versus oversight versus crisis management 36 Meetings, meetings, and more meetings 61 Internal NSC staff management 72 Appendix A 73 About the authors 74 Endnotes Introduction and summary Most modern presidents have found that the transition from campaigning to governing presents a unique set of challenges, especially regarding their newfound national security responsibilities. Regardless of their party affiliation or preferred diplomatic priorities, presidents have invariably come to appreciate that they can- not afford to make foreign policy decisions in the same manner as they did when they were a candidate. The requirements of managing an enormous and complex national security bureau- cracy reward careful deliberation and strategic consistency, while sharply punishing the kind of policy shifts that are more common on the campaign trail. Statements by the president are taken far more seriously abroad than are promises by a candidate, by both allies and adversaries alike. And while policy mistakes made before entering office can damage a candidate’s personal political prospects, a serious misstep made once in office can put the country itself at risk. -
Speakers & Programs
NEW SPEAKERS & PROGRAMS FOR YOUR CAMPUS VOICES OF INCLUSION Speaking to the World APBSPEAKERS.COM 617.614.1600 50th Anniversary | MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. “There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right.” -MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. Martin Luther King Jr.’s words are as relevant today as they were 50 years ago. A courageous leader whose vision for equality sparked monumental advances in civil rights, Dr. King adamantly opposed violence in his fight for justice. Now, as we celebrate his legacy amidst great political and social unrest in our nation, hear from other civil rights pioneers who continue to advocate for change and unity: Jesse Jackson, Diane Nash, Clarence B. Jones, Joyce Ladner and Bernice King. What’s Inside This Catalog Featured Programs.....................3 SHOWCASING TODAY’S TOP SPEAKERS, African-Americans....................7 this catalog will guide you in choosing the right voice to educate, entertain and inspire the entire campus Hispanics & Hispanic Americans...18 community at your next event. Asians & Asian-Americans........20 LGBTQ..................................21 “The best in the business.” Disability Awareness................22 -University of North Florida Native Americans.....................23 Index...................................24 2 VOICES OF INCLUSION . APBSPEAKERS.COM . 617.614.1600 FEATURED PROGRAMS OVERCOMING ADVERSITY STRONGER: Boston Marathon Bombing Survivors Jeff Bauman and Heather Abbott were ordinary people who set out to enjoy Marathon Monday in Boston on April 15, 2013. They never dreamed that day would change their lives forever. After an explosion led to amputations for both Bauman and Abbott, they vowed to overcome tragedy and rebuild their lives. -
Marcin Styszyński PRESENT TRENDS AMONG JIHADISTS
XI: 2014 nr 3 Marcin Styszyński PRESENT TRENDS AMONG JIHADISTS AFTER THE ARAB SPRING Post-revolutionary environment The Arab Spring created three main trends in current political Islam. The fi rst fi eld concerns offi cial Muslim parties declaring implementation of some Islamic values in legal, constitutional and social life. They resign from violence and accept politi- cal dialogue and mechanisms such as free elections, referendum or parliamentary activities. The second factor refl ects Salafi preaching and radical ideas preserving conservative traditions from the period of the Prophet Mohammad. Salafi groups are focused on their theological teaching, charity work and popularization of moral values among societies. The third category concerns jihadist organizations that dec- lare violence and fi ght against authorities and societies. They refer to the concept of takfīr (excommunication), which considers the state and the society as a sinful and atheistic group supporting immoral and corrupted governments. Moreover, the idea of takfīr is close to Al-Qaeda activities regarding violent renaissance of historic caliphate and implementation of strict sharia rules. Al-Qaeda also adapts defensive and off ensive sense of jihad to modern political context related to Western policy in the Muslim world. The victory of the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi groups in parliamentary elections in Egypt and Tunisia in 2011, the presidency of Mohammad Mursi as 26 MARCIN STYSZYŃSKI well as control of main regions in Libya and Syria by extremist militias increased infl uences of radical Islam in post-revolutionary countries.1 However, after three years of the transition process Arab societies have changed their attitude to the crucial values of the Arab revolution such as democra- cy, freedom, liberalism or fi ght against authoritarianism. -
Prison Radicalization: Are Terrorist Cells Forming in U
United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Joseph I. Lieberman, ID-Conn. FORT HOOD PRESS CONFERENCE STATEMENT Chairman Joe Lieberman February 3, 2011 Good afternoon and thanks to everyone for coming. Today, Senator Collins and I are releasing our report on the Fort Hood terrorist attack that killed 13 people and injured 32 others on November 5, 2009. We‟re very proud of the report and grateful to our bipartisan staff that carried out the report, which we embrace today. The staff led by Committee staff director Mike Alexander and his team Gordon Lederman, Charlie Martel, and Seamus Hughes The minority staff director Brandon Milhorn was a full partner in this endeavor and others Senator Collins will name in her statement. The point is that they all worked very long and hard on this investigation, but the most important point is that the product of their labor, this report, presents the most comprehensive understanding yet of the massacre at Fort Hood and enables us to make recommendations, particularly to the Department of Defense and the FBI, about how they and we can work together to better combat radicalization to violent Islamist extremism among people, like Nidal Hasan, inside America and to prevent anything like the murders at Fort Hood from happening again. Throughout our investigation, the victims of this attack, and their families, have weighed heavily on our minds because our report‟s painful conclusion is that the Fort Hood massacre could have, and should have, been prevented. We have reached that conclusion because our investigation found that employees of the Department of Defense and the FBI had compelling evidence of Nidal Hasan‟s growing embrace of violent Islamist extremism in the years before the attack that should have caused them to discharge him from the U.S. -
Congressional Record—House H454
H454 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE February 2, 2010 HONORING THE U.S. COAST GUARD women of the Coast Guard Sector telligence officials? No. Did Attorney CUTTER ‘‘MOHAWK’’ Miami, as well as the Sector Key West, General Holder declare this terrorist The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a truly lived their motto, ‘‘Always an enemy combatant and turn him previous order of the House, the gentle- ready.’’ over to the military for further ques- woman from Florida (Ms. ROS- We as a nation can never repay those tioning? No. Did Attorney General LEHTINEN) is recognized for 5 minutes. who serve, but we can take pride in Holder have the FBI continue the ques- Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN. Mr. Speaker, I knowing that those men and women tioning in order to obtain more action- rise tonight to honor the brave work have served not just our community able intelligence? No. and the supreme dedication of the com- but our neighbors in need as well. So what did Attorney General Holder mand and crew of the U.S. Coast Guard Their humanitarian mission reminds have the FBI do? He instructed them to Cutter Mohawk. us all of what it means to be an Amer- give full Miranda rights to this ter- The Mohawk has just returned from a ican and why we should be so proud to rorist, including the right to remain si- 2-month deployment and is now home say, every day, ‘‘I am an American.’’ lent, and gave him not one, not two, at Coast Guard Sector Key West. Dur- The commitment of the U.S. -
Fort Hood Rampage: ‘The Most Destructive Terrorist Act Committed on the American Soil Since 09.11" ?
ANALYSIS 09/11/2009 FORT HOOD RAMPAGE: ‘THE MOST DESTRUCTIVE TERRORIST ACT COMMITTED ON THE AMERICAN SOIL SINCE 09.11" ? By Claude MONIQUET President of ESISC Looking beyond the tragedy, the massacre at Fort Hood appears extremely interesting for any expert in terrorism because it sheds light on the mechanism of individual radicalisation which can affect persons who have no proven ties with a terrorist structure, transforming them into ‘self-recruited Jihadists.’ Unfortunately, the same tragedy also tells us a lot about the systemic dysfunctionalities within the chain of command of the American Armed Forces, the intelligence agencies and the agencies of law enforcement . The slaughter was not fated to be and could very probably have been averted. It would have sufficed if each party had done its job without allowing itself to be led astray by political correctness and a purely ‘utilitarian’ logic. Political correctness has prompted the investigators and the press to deal with this case as an horrible but simple crime news story and not as a terrorist act. President Barack Obama, for example , said in a serious tone that one ‘must not jump to conclusions too quickly.’ He otherwise is symbolically playing down the scope of this carnage: how else can one explain that he did not find time to go to Fort Hood until five days after the drama took place? As for the press, in its great majority it strikes us that for days now there are few proofs given linking this affair to a terrorist plot and one can thus merely wonder about the motivations of the killer… It is obvious that in this affair there remain areas in the shadows, and that is quite normal since the investigation began just a few days ago and the main ‘suspect,’ Major Nidal Malik Hasan was being treated in an artificial respirator until Saturday and has still not testified to the investigators. -
Irshad-Manji-On-Free-Speech-And
Irshad Manji on Free Speech and Islam Nigel Warburton: Irshad Manji welcome to Free Speech Bites. Irshad Manji: Thrilled to be here! Nigel Warburton: The topic we are going to focus on is Islam and free expression. Now first off that sounds like two incompatible things. How can you talk about free expression in the context of Islam? Irshad Manji: Well, you know, I’m a person of faith: my faith is Islam. For me free expression is as much a religious obligation as it is a human right. What I mean is this: we Muslims as monotheists are to be worshiping one God - not God’s self-appointed ambassadors, which means no human being can legitimately behave as if he or she owns a monopoly on truth. And what that in turn means is that it is a spiritual duty for Muslims to then help to build societies in which we can disagree with each other in peace and with civility, because anything less means that we are playing God with one another – and that is the central sin in Islam. So, here’s the bottom line, a paradox if you will: devoting yourself to one God obliges you to defend human liberty. Nigel Warburton: That’s not obviously how this is being played out in term of Islam… Irshad Manji: Boy, do I ever know that! Nigel Warburton: So why do so many people go down another route and think that actually there being one God demands that you follow one particular set of rules, one particular view of what that God is like and what it is for that God to be offended? Irshad Manji: There are many reasons for this, and no excuses, but many reasons. -
Blank Logs Template
FOIA Requests Closed by OIP in September 2017 Request Number Office Submitted Date Date Closed Summary of Request Disposition of Request DOJ-2017-006081 DAG 08/15/2017 09/01/2017 Copy of the September 9, 2015 memorandum from former Deputy Attorney Full grant General Sally Yates pertaining to individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. DOJ-2017-005839 AG 08/04/2017 09/01/2017 Records submitted pursuant to Executive Order 13800, Strengthening the All records referred to another Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. agency DOJ-2017-005919 OIP 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning Freedom of Information Act requests and responses No records regarding Senator Joe Manchin submitted since November 2012. DOJ-2017-005681 AG 07/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-004908 AG 06/26/2017 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Attorney General's Summer Intern Lecture Series. Other - Directed Requester to Another Entity Subject to the FOIA DOJ-2017-005914 AG 08/08/2017 09/06/2017 Records pertaining to meeting between President Bill Clinton and Attorney Partial grant/partial denial General Loretta Lynch that took place at the Phoenix airport in June 2016. DOJ-2014-000036 ASG 10/21/2013 09/06/2017 Records resulting from a search of the Departmental Executive Secretariat All records referred to another database involving the term "Guantanamo." agency DOJ-2015-000022 AG 10/22/2014 09/06/2017 Records concerning the Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Full grant Force in 2011. -
What They Are Saying What Aep Members Are Saying
WHAT THEY ARE SAYING The American Edge Project’s (AEP) national security policy framework reflects decades of experience and expertise gained from leaders in the national security space. As the policy makes clear: the United States risks critical long-term national security consequences if it relinquishes its global leadership role in technology to foreign entities with diametrically different values, which put at risk the safety, privacy, and economic prosperity of Americans. AEP’s national security policy framework forges a path towards maintaining America’s technological edge globally through three key pillars: protecting the ability to innovate; securing U.S. technology, networks and data through enhanced cybersecurity; and advancing a democratic and open internet. WHAT AEP MEMBERS ARE SAYING “Very proud to work on the launch of the American Edge Project framework for national security policy. This critical report, led by Admiral James Stavridis and Frances Townsend and supported by Michael Allen, Jeremy Bash, Jamil Jaffer, Kaitlyn Garman, among many others highlights the consequences if the U.S. loses its global technology leadership role. #cybersecurity #nationalsecurity #digitalpower” - Stephen Rodriguez, Founder, Managing Partner, One Defense “The global pandemic has rapidly sped up the integration of the internet as a common denominator in every aspect of economic and cultural society. The American Edge Project highlights that if the U.S. loses its leadership role in technology, there will be long-term consequences for national security, the global economy, standard setting and international norms.” - Kent Kaiser, PhD, Executive Director, Trade Alliance to Promote Prosperity “Policies that forfeit the U.S. competitive edge to foreign entities put the safety, privacy and economic prosperity of Americans at risk.