Systematic Studies in Gnidia L. (Thymelaeaceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Systematic Studies in Gnidia L. (Thymelaeaceae) UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL SYSTEMATIC STUDIES IN GNIDIA L. (THYMELAEACEAE) ANGELA JANE BEAUMONT SYSTEMATIC STUDIES IN GNIDIA L. (THYMELAEACEAE) by ANGELA JANE BEAUMONT Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg January 2010 STUDENT DECLARATION sa ~T.~ .~. ~!I.~ ... ~l".v.-P.I ..~.~ .. .\. N.. ~ N! );):, .~ .. k... (THJ1m~.4A~.I3.~E A.€) (Thesis Title) I A. N. 6"~. ~ f:\ o.-.A.~~ e.~ .A.~ M.C? NT '" . (full name) ....... ~.S..~.~~?"J'.~~ '" '" .. , (Student Number) declare that: (i) The research reported in this dissertation, except where otherwise indicated, is the result of my own endeavours in the School of Biological and ConseNation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg; (ii) This dissertation has not been submitted for any degrees or examination at any other University; (iii) This thesis does not contain data, figures or writing, unless specifically acknowledged, copied from other researchers; and (iv) Where I have reproduced a publication of which I am an author or co-author, I have indicated which part of the publication was contributed by me. Signed at ... .e1.~T~.~.M.~~!!:?~.~.f?~ .... on the .3.9........ day of ................. J>.~.~~.~.~~.~., 2009. DECLARATION BY SUPERVISORS We hereby declare that we acted as Supervisors for this PhD student: Student's Full Name: ANGELA JANE BEAUMONT Student Number: 882225798 Thesis Title: SYSTEMATIC STUDIES IN GNIDIA L. (THYMELAEACEAE). Regular consultation took place between the student and ourselves throughout the investigation. We advised the student to the best of our ability and approved the final document for submission to the Faculty of Science and Agriculture Higher Degrees Office for examination by the University appointed Examiners. SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR TJ EDWARDS CO-SUPERVISOR: PROFESSO J VAN STADEN 11 DECLARATION BY SiPERVISOR We hereby declare that we acted as suprrviSOrs for this PD student: Studenfs Full Name: . .41~' .J!:>.IJ& &.'IM~d. .. Student Number: ~.S.. ~.~.~ ..~.:r.5~ ,. Thesis Title:.5.~~:T.~.M.f:l.T.~~... ~I~.~!.~.$ .I.~ ~.N..I J::nA '-:-:.~. ('TH ~ (Y\ e L-A€ PI C€- ~€.). Regular consultation took place between the student an ourselves throughout the investigation. We advised the student to the best of our ability and approved the final document for submis ion to the Faculty of Science and Agriculture Higher Degrees Office for examination by the University appointed Examiners. ' SUPERVISOR: CO-SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR J AN STADEN 11 FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 1 - PLAGIARISM I, ....A:~..~.~.I:-:.A .... ;rA.N~ ... G.~.~.~.M.C?~T. ...., declare that I. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons' data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons' writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general infonnation attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in italics and inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. Signed .....•.....~ . Declaration Plagiarism 22105108 FHDR Approved 111 FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND AGRICULTURE DECLARATION 2 - PUBLICATIONS DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO PUBLICATIONS that form part and/or include research presented in this thesis (include publications in preparation, submitted, in press and published and give details of the contributions of each author to the experimental work and writing ofeach publication) Publication I BEAUMONT, AJ. 2000. Gnidia. In: GOLDBLATI, P. & MANNING, J. (eds.). Cape Plants. A conspectus of the Cape Flora of South Africa. Strelitzia 9: 676-680. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria. Publication 2 BEAUMONT, AJ., EDWARDS, T.J. & SMITH, F.R. 2001. Leaf and bract diversity in Gnidia (Thymelaeaceae): patterns and taxonomic value. Systematics and Geography ofPlants 71: 399-418. Publication 3 BEAUMONT, AJ., EDWARDS, T.J. &SMITH, F.R. 2001. Patterns of diversity among involucral bracts, inflorescences and flowers in Gnidia (Thymelaeaceae). Systematics and Geography ofPlants 71: 419-431. Publication 4 EDWARDS, T.J., BE-AUMONT, AJ. &STYLES, D. 2001. New records and distributional disjunctions from South Africa, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. Bothalia 31: 199-201. Publication 5 BEAUMONT, AJ., EDWARDS, T.J. & SMITH, FR. 2006. The first record of gynodioecy in a species of Gnidia (Thymelaeaceae) from South Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 152: 219-233. iv Publication 6 BEAUMONT, A.J., EDWARDS, T.J., MANNING, J., MAURIN, 0., RAUTENBACH, M., MOTSI, M.C., FAY, M.F., CHASE, M.W. & VAN DER BANK, M. 2009. Gnidia (Thymelaeaceae) is not monophyletic: taxonomic implications for Thymelaeoideae and a partial new generic taxonomy for Gnidia. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 160: 402-417. I am the senior author ofall the publications except for publication 4, in which I am a co-author. In publication 6, the molecular work was done by M. VAN DER BANK and M. RAUTENBACH (Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University ofJohannesburg, South Africa). Signed: A. J. Beaumont Declaration Publications FHDR 22105108 Approved v ABSTRACT SYSTEMATIC STUDIES IN GNIDIA L. (THYMELAEACEAE) BEAUMONT, A.J., Ph.D. thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2010 Gnidia L., variously estimated to contain 100–160 species, is the largest genus in the sub-cosmopolitan family Thymelaeaceae. Most species are shrubby, and occur in tropical and southern Africa, with one species reaching southern India and Sri Lanka, and 14 species endemic to Madagascar. Assorted segregate genera have been established using characters considered by some as too few, too trivial or unreliable. Generic limits have been contentious with authors following either a narrower concept of Gnidia or a broader circumscription within which segregate genera are placed in synonymy under Gnidia. Regional treatments for African and Madagascan floras have been published over the last century until very recently, but the genus was last revised in its entirety 153 years ago. Today, a broad-based concept of Gnidia is generally recognised, but there is no modern infrageneric classification, and species relationships are poorly understood. Homogenous groups of species are identified by their similarities of leaf length and width or bract length and width ratios. Species comprising the homogenous groups for leaf ratios differ to those comprising the homogenous groups based on bract ratios, and there is no correlation between leaf and bract length and width ratios. This suggests that the factors influencing leaf diversity differ from those influencing vi bract diversity. Bracts differ most from leaves in species with capitate inflorescences, and involucres of several layers of bracts likely protect reproductive organs (flowers) in heads. Previously overlooked morphological and micromorphological details, and morphometric analyses of leaf, bract and floral dimension data help define individual species, and clades of species derived from phylogenetic analyses of molecular data. Evidence from a phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal and plastid DNA sequence data confirms the polyphyly of Gnidia. Three lineages contain Gnidia species and species of genera from southern Africa, southern South America or Australia, while another lineage corresponds largely to the previously recognized genus Lasiosiphon. The genus Lasiosiphon is reinstated characterised by flowers mostly in heads, bracts different from the leaves, and the presence of smooth hairs; it now includes species with tetramerous flowers as well as ones with pentamerous flowers. Gynodioecy is recorded for the first time in a single species and represents the first documented example of sexual polymorphism involving unisexual flowers in Gnidia and sub- Saharan Thymelaeaceae. The findings of this thesis are discussed in terms of their phylogenetic value and contribution to our better understanding of the generic limits of Gnidia and its relationships with other southern hemisphere Thymelaeoideae. The circumscription and generic affinities of Gnidia as suggested by results presented in this thesis are compared to previous classification systems for congruence and dissimilarity. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Professor T.J. Edwards for his supervision of this thesis, for his critical input, constructive comments, and support. I am grateful to Professor J. van Staden of the Centre for Plant Growth and Development for chairing my research committee meetings and for facilitating the completion of this thesis. I thank Dr. W. Cress for his participation and input in my research committee meetings. A special thank you goes to Professor R.P. Beckett for his assistance in the field, constructive advice, and use of computer facilities and for his unwavering support, hospitality and friendship.
Recommended publications
  • Thymelaeaceae)
    Origin and diversification of the Australasian genera Pimelea and Thecanthes (Thymelaeaceae) by MOLEBOHENG CYNTHIA MOTS! Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG Supervisor: Dr Michelle van der Bank Co-supervisors: Dr Barbara L. Rye Dr Vincent Savolainen JUNE 2009 AFFIDAVIT: MASTER'S AND DOCTORAL STUDENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This serves to confirm that I Moleboheng_Cynthia Motsi Full Name(s) and Surname ID Number 7808020422084 Student number 920108362 enrolled for the Qualification PhD Faculty _Science Herewith declare that my academic work is in line with the Plagiarism Policy of the University of Johannesburg which I am familiar. I further declare that the work presented in the thesis (minor dissertation/dissertation/thesis) is authentic and original unless clearly indicated otherwise and in such instances full reference to the source is acknowledged and I do not pretend to receive any credit for such acknowledged quotations, and that there is no copyright infringement in my work. I declare that no unethical research practices were used or material gained through dishonesty. I understand that plagiarism is a serious offence and that should I contravene the Plagiarism Policy notwithstanding signing this affidavit, I may be found guilty of a serious criminal offence (perjury) that would amongst other consequences compel the UJ to inform all other tertiary institutions of the offence and to issue a corresponding certificate of reprehensible academic conduct to whomever request such a certificate from the institution. Signed at _Johannesburg on this 31 of _July 2009 Signature Print name Moleboheng_Cynthia Motsi STAMP COMMISSIONER OF OATHS Affidavit certified by a Commissioner of Oaths This affidavit cordons with the requirements of the JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND COMMISSIONERS OF OATHS ACT 16 OF 1963 and the applicable Regulations published in the GG GNR 1258 of 21 July 1972; GN 903 of 10 July 1998; GN 109 of 2 February 2001 as amended.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES Appendix II
    PC20 Inf. 7 Annex 9 INTRODUCTION TO CITES AND AGARWOOD OVERVIEW Asian Regional Workshop on Agarwood; 22-24 November 2011 By Milena Sosa Schmidt, CITES Secretariat: [email protected] A bit of history Several genera from the family Thymeleaceae are agarwood producing taxa. These are: Aquilaria, Enkleia, Aetoxylon, Gonystylus, Wikstroemia, Gyrinops. They produce different qualities of agarwood from which Aquilaria seems to be the best (see Indonesia report of 2003). From these six genera we have currently three listed on CITES Appendix II. The history of these listings is as follows: THYMELAEACEAE (AQUILARIACEAE) (E) Agarwood, ramin; (S) Madera de Agar, ramin; (F) Bois d'Agar, ramin Aquilaria spp. II 12/01/05 #1CoP13 II/r AE 12/01/05 Excludes Aquilaria malaccensis. Excluye Aquilaria malaccensis. Exclus Aquilaria malaccensis. II/r KW 12/01/05 Excludes Aquilaria malaccensis. Excluye Aquilaria malaccensis. Exclus Aquilaria malaccensis. II/r QA 12/01/05 Excludes Aquilaria malaccensis. Excluye Aquilaria malaccensis. Exclus Aquilaria malaccensis. II/r SY 12/01/05 Excludes Aquilaria malaccensis. Excluye Aquilaria malaccensis. Exclus Aquilaria malaccensis. II 13/09/07 #1CoP14 II 23/06/10 #4CoP15 Aquilaria malaccensis II 16/02/95 #1CoP9 II 12/01/05 Included in Aquilaria spp. Incluida en Aquilaria spp. Inclus dans Aquilaria spp. Gonystylus spp. III ID 06/08/01 #1CoP11 III/r MY 17/08/01 II 12/01/05 #1CoP13 II/r MY 12/01/05 II/w MY 07/06/05 II 13/09/07 #1CoP14 II 23/06/10 #4CoP15 Gyrinops spp. II 12/01/05 #1CoP13 II/r AE 12/01/05 II/r KW 12/01/05 II/r QA 12/01/05 II/r SY 12/01/05 II 13/09/07 #1CoP14 II 23/06/10 #4CoP15 The current annotation for these taxa is #4 and reads: All parts and derivatives, except: 1 PC20 Inf.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Abatement Plan for Disease in Natural Ecosystems Caused by Phytophthora Cinnamomi
    Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi March 2017 DRAFT FOR COMMENT © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2017 The Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/. This DRAFT report should be attributed as ‘Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi, Commonwealth of Australia, 2017’. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and are valid as at March 2017. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Table of Contents Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi .......................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production OCTOBER 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production by Jonathan Lidbetter October 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000509 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-328-4 ISSN 1440-6845 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production Publication No. 11/149 Project No. PRJ-000509 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of on the Basis of of 2014 CITES Quotas of Species Selected
    UNEP-WCMC technical report Review of species selected on the basis of the Analysis of 2014 CITES export quotas Part II (Version edited for public release) Review of species selected on the basis of the Analysis of 2014 CITES export quotas. Part II. Prepared for The European Commission, Directorate General Environment , Directorate E - Global & Regional Challenges, LIFE ENV.E.2. – Global Sustainability, Trade & Multilateral Agreements , Brussels, Belgium Published November 2014 Copyright European Commission 2014 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2014. Review of species selected on the basis of the Analysis of 2014 CITES export quotas. Part II. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with policy advice and the development of decision tools. We are able to provide objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision -makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. To do this, we collate and verify data on biodiversity and ecosystem services that we analyze and interpret in comprehensive assessments, making the results available in ap propriate forms for national and international level decision-makers and businesses. To ensure that our work is both sustainable and equitable we seek to build the capacity of partners where needed, so that they can provide the same services at national and regional scales. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP, contributory organisations or editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’S National Reserve System Contents
    Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Contents Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System — At a glance 1 Australia’s National Reserve System 2 The Importance of Species Information 3 Our State of Knowledge 4 Method 5 Results 6 Future Work — Survey and Reservation 8 Conclusion 10 Summary of Data 11 Appendix Species with adequate data and well represented in the National Reserve System Flora 14 Fauna 44 Species with adequate data and under-represented in the National Reserve System Flora 52 Fauna 67 Species with inadequate data Flora 73 Fauna 114 Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System At a glance • Australia’s National Reserve System (NRS) consists of over 9,000 protected areas, covering 89.5 million hectares (over 11 per cent of Australia’s land mass). • Australia is home to 7.8 per cent of the world’s plant and animal species, with an estimated 566,398 species occurring here.1 Only 147,579 of Australia’s species have been formally described. • This report assesses the state of knowledge of biodiversity in the National Reserve System based on 20,146 terrestrial fauna and flora species, comprising 54 per cent of the known terrestrial biodiversity of Australia. • Of these species, 33 per cent (6,652 species) have inadequate data to assess their reservation status. • Of species with adequate data: • 23 per cent (3,123 species) are well represented in the NRS • 65 per cent (8,692 species) are adequately represented in the NRS • 12 per cent (1,648 species) are under- represented in the NRS 1 Chapman, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the Hypersaline Urmia Lake National Park (NW Iran)
    Diversity 2014, 6, 102-132; doi:10.3390/d6010102 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Review Biodiversity of the Hypersaline Urmia Lake National Park (NW Iran) Alireza Asem 1,†,*, Amin Eimanifar 2,†,*, Morteza Djamali 3, Patricio De los Rios 4 and Michael Wink 2 1 Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China 2 Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Institut Méditerranéen d’Ecologie et de Paléoécologie UMR 6116 du CNRS-Europôle Méditerranéen de l’Arbois-Pavillon Villemin-BP 80, Aix-en-Provence Cedex 04 13545, France; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Environmental Sciences School, Natural Resources Faculty, Catholic University of Temuco, Casilla 15-D, Temuco 4780000, Chile; E-Mail: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (A.E.); Tel.: +86-150-6624-4312 (A.A.); Fax: +86-532-8203-2216 (A.A.); Tel.: +49-6221-544-880 (A.E.); Fax: +49-6221-544-884 (A.E.). Received: 3 December 2013; in revised form: 13 January 2014 / Accepted: 27 January 2014 / Published: 10 February 2014 Abstract: Urmia Lake, with a surface area between 4000 to 6000 km2, is a hypersaline lake located in northwest Iran. It is the saltiest large lake in the world that supports life. Urmia Lake National Park is the home of an almost endemic crustacean species known as the brine shrimp, Artemia urmiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Variation and DNA Barcoding of the Endangered
    DOI: 10.5152/forestist.2020.20009 2020, 70(2): 85-94 Original Article Genetic variation and DNA barcoding of the endangered agarwood-producing Aquilaria beccariana (Thymelaeaceae) populations from the Malesia Region Malezya Bölgesinde nesli tükenmekte olan Aquilaria beccariana (Thymelaeaceae) popülasyonlarının genetik varyasyonu ve DNA barkodu Yu Cong Pern , Shiou Yih Lee , Norizah Kamarudin , Rozi Mohamed Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia ABSTRACT The endangered agarwood-producing Aquilaria beccariana is reportedly secluded in the southern region of the Malay Peninsula (MPen) and more dispersed in the northern and central regions of the Borneo Island (Bor). The two are geographically separated by the South China Sea. Fresh leaf samples from 47 individuals were collected from six natural populations, including Mersing (MERS) of MPen; Upper Baram (BARA1), Marudi (BARA2), and Lawas (LAWA) of Sarawak; Tongod (TONG) of Sabah, and Kalimantan (KALI) of Indonesia, to study their phylogenetic relationship. Seven non-coding chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions and the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region were amplified and sequenced using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Several closely related Aquilaria species were included to demonstrate the molecular position of A. beccariana. Phy- logenetic analysis, median-joining (MJ) network, and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) assembled the six populations into two major clusters, MPen and Bor, when using the combined cpDNA dataset, whereas the Bor populations were further clustered into northern and central populations. DNA barcoding analysis using the combined trnL–trnF+ITS2 loci of 12 Aquilaria species revealed that species discrimination is possible for A. beccariana at both species and population levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of China 13: 248–250. 2007. 8. DIARTHRON Turczaninow, Bull
    Flora of China 13: 248–250. 2007. 8. DIARTHRON Turczaninow, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 5: 204. 1832. 草瑞香属 cao rui xiang shu Wang Yinzheng (王印政); Michael G. Gilbert Stelleropsis Pobedimova. Annual or perennial herbs, or small deciduous shrubs. Leaves alternate; leaf blade elliptic, linear, or lanceolate, herbaceous. In- florescence usually terminal, sometimes apparently axillary, laxly racemose to capitate, without involucre. Flowers bisexual, small, 4(or 5)-merous. Calyx reddish, white, or green; tube persistent, slender, urceolate, funnel-shaped, or cylindric, contracted and articu- late at apex of ovary; lobes 4, erect and slightly spreading. Petaloid appendages absent. Stamens as many as or twice as many as calyx lobes, in one or two series, opposite to calyx lobes when in one series; filaments absent; anthers oblong, included. Disk annu- lar, oblique, sometimes tiny or absent. Ovary ± stipitate, glabrous, 1-loculed; style excentric or subterminal, short; stigma subclavate, thick. Fruit dry, enclosed by persistent calyx base; pericarp thin, glossy black. Sixteen species: C and SW Asia, SE Europe (European Russia); four species in China. The authors have accepted the view of Kit Tan (Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 40: 219–220. 1982) that the difference in habit used to separ- ate the annual herbs of Diarthron sensu stricto from the perennial herbs traditionally placed in Stelleropsis and the small shrubs in the C Asian genus Dendrostellera (C. A. Meyer) Tieghem are outweighed by the similar 4-merous flowers and ebracteate inflorescences combined with the continuous range of variation in habit. 1a. Calyx tube 2–4 mm; annual herbs, mainly branched well above base, roots not thickened; hypogynous disk very reduced or absent; inflorescence terminal, lax, elongated, spikelike.
    [Show full text]
  • Bindoon Bypass a 1
    APPENDIX A: THREATENED AND PRIORITY WITH THE POTENTIAL TO OCCUR WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ^ Denotes species targeted during Autumn 2017 surveys # Denotes species targeted during Winter 2017 surveys * Denotes species targeted during Spring 2017 surveys EPBC Act WC Act Species Description Preferred Habitat Likelihood of occurrence Source Cons. Status Status Critically Erect, or spreading, shrub to 0.7 m high. Grey-white sand on swampy, Darwinia foetida Endangered May occur, recorded by Phoenix (2015) Phoenix (2015) Endangered Green flowers in spring seasonally wet sites Tuberous, perennial, herb, 0.25-0.6 m high. Critically Grey or brown sand, clay Unlikely to occur, not previously recorded EPBC Caladenia huegelii* Endangered Flowers green & cream & red, September to Endangered loam from within Shire of Chittering Phoenix (2015) October Critically Spreading shrub, 0.2-0.45m high. Flowers Unlikely to occur, closest record from the Darwinia carnea* Endangered Lateritic loam & gravel NatureMap Endangered green and red, October to December Mogumber area Tuberous, perennial, herb, 0.12-0.3 m high. White or grey sand. Low- Critically May occur, previously DBCA record located DPaW (2016) Drakaea elastica# Endangered Flowers red & green & yellow, October to lying situations adjoining Endangered within Area 2 (‘Western A alignment’) NatureMap November winter-wet swamps Low compact or sprawling to upright shrub, Clay, sandy clay or loam. Critically Unlikely to occur, known to occur in Moora Eremophila scaberula Endangered 0.15-0.7(-1.5) m high. Flowers purple-blue, Winter-wet plains, inundated EPBC Endangered district August to October areas (Mallee), to 5 m high, bark rough, flaky. Critically Sandy soils with lateritic Unlikely to occur, known records occur a EPBC Eucalyptus x balanites Endangered Flowers white, October to December or Endangered gravel significant distance from the study area Phoenix (2015) January to February Low shrub, 0.2-0.45 m high.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Notes on American Thymelaeaceae
    Nomenclatural Notes on American Thymelaeaceae Zachary S. Rogers Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63116-0299, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT . The nomenclatural status of all published belong to the much larger Thymelaeaoideae subfam- plant names applicable to American Thymelaeaceae ily. Centers of species diversity are located in Brazil at the rank of genus and below is evaluated. Thirty- (particularly around Rio de Janeiro), northwestern two of the 256 published names at specific and South America (especially Ecuador, Colombia, and infraspecific ranks require effective typifications. Venezuela), and the Greater Antilles. Despite the Lectotypes are designated for 29 names: Daphne availability of relatively recent taxonomic treatments lagetto Sw., D. macrophylla Kunth, D. occidentalis for some American genera, much of the nomenclature Sw., D. pillopillo Gay, Daphnopsis bogotensis Meisn., and typification of these groups has not been D. brasiliensis Mart., D. caracasana Meisn., D. comprehensively evaluated, a shortcoming that is the caribaea Griseb. var. ecuadorensis Domke, D. coriacea primary focus of the research presented here. Taub., D. decidua Domke, D. ekmanii Domke, D. ericiflora Gilg & Markgr., D. longifolia Taub., D. TAXONOMIC HISTORY OF AMERICAN THYMELAEACEAE longipedunculata Gilg ex Domke, D. longiracemosa Gilg ex Domke, D. martii Meisn., D. purpusii Daphnopsis Mart., with approximately 73 dioecious Brandegee var. ehrenbergii Domke, D. racemosa species, is by far the largest genus in the Americas, Griseb., D. sessiliflora Griseb. ex Taub., D. zamorensis ranging from central Mexico to Chile and Argentina, Domke, Goodallia guianensis Benth., G. guianensis and also throughout most of the Antilles. Nevling var. parvifolia Benth., Lagetta funifera Mart.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]