DOCSLIB.ORG

INVENTORY of ANSWERS to the Consultation Document on the Basic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INVENTORY of ANSWERS to the Consultation Document on the Basic INVENTORY OF ANSWERS to the consultation document on the basic principles and essential requirements for the safety and interoperability regulation of aerodromes Question 1 The Agency is interested in knowing if stakeholders agree that the establishment of dedicated high level essential requirements at Community level is the best means to set the safety objectives for the safety regulation of aerodromes. Comment From Nature number 0001 CAA Romania These stakeholders broadly support the adoption of Essential 0065 CAA Belgium Requirements (ER) at Community level as the best means to set the 0074 British Helicopter safety objectives for the safety regulation of aerodromes. Advisory Board 0081 CAA Spain Many of them at the same time emphasize certain aspects, which 0107 DFS should be taken into account when regulating in this field: 0142 AEA - maximum consistency with ICAO SARPs 0172 BAA Aberdeen Airport - proportionate rules for small or non-commercial aerodromes 0189 Gloucestershire Airport - consistency with the Single European Sky (SES) regulations 0198 BAA Central Airside in CNS/ATM Operations - setting ER on appropriately high level 0217 BAA Heathrow - harmonisation on minimum safety levels across all EU 0235 Guernsey Airport Member States 0265 Fraport AG 0509 CAA Slovak Republic 0564 CAA Netherlands 0582 CAA Denmark 0611 Glasgow Airport Airfield Operations 0637 Manchester Airport 0700 Nottingham East Midlands Airport 0727 AMS Schiphol Airport 0738 Belgian Gliding Federation 0784 CAA UK 0911 Birmingham Airport 0936 CAA Greece 1046 Irish Aviation Authority 1079 Airbus, France 1093 CAA Sweden 1111 Humberside Airport 1120 Dublin Airport Authority 1153 ENAC Italy 1172 Ministry of Transport Slovenia 1196 ECA 1208 CAA Norway 1219 Christian Marek 1269 Luton Airport Inventory - CRD to NPA-06-2006 page 1 of 43 1275 FOCA Switzerland 1286 Dutch Civil Airports Association 1331 IFATCA 2967 CAA-Czech Republic 2988 ECOGAS 2997,3004 EUROCONTROL 0029 Air League These stakeholders support the adoption of ER as appropriate means to 0098 Bickerton’s Aerodromes set the safety objectives provided that the small aerodromes used for Ltd recreational purposes or remote aerodromes would be excluded from 0253 CAA Iceland the scope of this legal action. 0308 Count of Atlas 0316 Chris Way For the majority of them the threshold to identify large aerodromes 0319 Ian L. Craig Wood should be set for commercial air transport or operations by aircraft 0327 John H.E. Wells with MTOM more than 10 tons. 0330 EGU 0339 Chris Lear 0359 Ian Rhodes 0367 Michael Shaw 0375 Helicopter Club GB 0383 Richard Bailey 0391 Helicopter Museum 0399 John Allwright 0415 Ian Wace 0416 Richard Kingston 0424 Chris Fox 0440 Swiss Aero Club 0461 Richard McLachlan 0469 Peter Stratten 0476 G.P. Glibbery 0521 Squirrel Helicopters 0530 GAAC 0539 David Marks 0545 Jason Tebaldi 0553 Edward and Susan Vandyk 0574 CAA Finland 0615 Tony Harrison-Smith 0709 Richard Dawson 0748 IAOPA 0756 Janet Christie 0773 Anthony Christie 0823 UK Flying Farmers Association 0847 Clifford P. Lockyer 0859 Roger Hopkinson 0888 C.J.H. Richardson 0989 AOPA Italy 1024 AOPA Norway 1074 British Hanggliding and Paragliding Association 1284 Dutch Civil Airports This stakeholder does not see any benefit from the safety regulation, Association but sees a potential benefit for the internal market. 0011 KLM These stakeholders do not support the development of ER as common 0125 British International safety objectives and would therefore rather continue existing practises 0448 Teuge Airport with sole national implementation of ICAO SARPs. 0681 BMV Germany 0875 Schweizer Inventory - CRD to NPA-06-2006 page 2 of 43 Flugplatzverein 0968 Avinor AS 0977 German Airport Association 1187 Finavia 1238 Prague Airport 1687 Hessian Ministry of Economics, Transport, Urban and Regional Development 0040 AOPA UK These stakeholders did not indicate a clear position. 0295 Aubrey Bristow 1003 DGAC France 1139 ACI Europe 1229 Lyon Airport Analysis The majority of stakeholders agree with the establishment of high level essential requirements at Community level. However, a considerable number of general aviation stakeholders would like to exclude aerodromes used only for recreational purposes. It can be noted that 15 Ministries (or National Aviation Authorities) expressed a favourable opinion, while only one Administration of a Member State is opposing the regulation at European level. Inventory - CRD to NPA-06-2006 page 3 of 43 Question 2 on essential requirements The Agency is interested in knowing whether the attached essential requirements actually meet the criteria developed here above and whether they constitute a good basis for the safety and interoperability regulation of the aerodromes bearing in mind the envisaged scope. Comment From Nature number 0002 CAA Romania These stakeholders can broadly accept the proposed draft ER as a 0099 Bickerton’s Aerodromes good basis. In addition, many of them also proposed 0143 AEA improvements to draft ER. These proposed improvements have 0173 BAA Aberdeen Airport been individually analysed in the 'CRD - Essential Requirements + 0199 BAA Central Airside General Comments'. Operations 0218 BAA Heathrow Following more general issues were also raised by stakeholders in 0236 Guernsey Airport this context: 0317 Chris Way - enforcement of applicable rules 0484 British Airport Operators Ass. - proportionality of rules 0565 CAA Netherlands - need to ensure compatibility with ICAO SARPs 0575 CAA Finland - need to explain better flexibility and risk assessment in 0583 CAA Denmark the proposed framework 0785 CAA UK - competence scheme of ground handling personnel 0914 Birmingham Airport 0937 CAA Greece 1024 Irish Aviation Authority 1080 Airbus, France 1094 CAA Sweden 1112 Humberside Airport 1154 ENAC Italy 1188 Finavia 1220 Christian Marek 1239 CAA Czech Republic 1276 FOCA Switzerland 2968 Prague Airport 2998 EUROCONTROL 0030 Air League These stakeholders consider that the proposed draft ER are not 0301 G.M. Tipler satisfactory due to their too general nature. 0309 Count of Atlas 0320 Ian L. Craig Wood Most of the comments also invited the Agency to consider 0360 Ian Rhodes national legislation and experience in this field. 0368 Michael Shaw 0392 Helicopter Museum 0400 John Allwright 0417 Richard Kingston 0425 Chris Fox 0433 Michael Taylor 0462 Richard McLachlan 0477 G.P. Glibbery 0522 Squirrel Helicopters 0546 Jason Tebaldi 0554 Edward and Susan Vandyk 0616 Tony Harrison-Smith 0638 Manchester Airport 0749 IAOPA 0757 Janet Christie Inventory - CRD to NPA-06-2006 page 4 of 43 0774 Anthony Christie 0815 Michael Jacobsen 0824 UK Flying Farmer Association 0848 Clifford P. Lockyer 0860 Roger Hopkinson 0889 C.J.H. Richardson 0990 AOPA Italy 1025 AOPA Norway 0912 Birmingham Airport These stakeholders consider that the proposed draft ER are not 0108 DFS satisfactory due to their too detailed nature. 0127 British International 0266 Fraport Some see the risk of expanding too much the responsibilities of 0682 BMV Germany aerodrome operators. 2988 ECOGAS 0296 Aubrey Bristow These stakeholders did not express a clear statement to the 0540 David Marks question itself, but proposed: 1230 Lyon Airport - need of clearer definitions 2977 Teuge Airport - need to exclude small aerodromes used for recreational purposes from the scope of this legal action - improvement of first aid requirements 0331 EGU These stakeholders would rather continue existing practises with 0348 E.A. Sturmer sole national implementation of ICAO SARPs. 0441 Swiss Aero Club 0470 Peter Stratten In most cases this is because they do not regard draft ER as a good 0712 John Brady basis specifically for their activity, such as gliding or recreational 0876 Schweizer Flugplatzverein flying. 1688 Hessian Ministry of Economics, Transport, Urban and Regional Development 0969 Avinor AS These stakeholders did not indicate a clear position. 1146 ACI Europe 1259 Luton Airport Two of them consider that not enough information on the risk 1289 Dutch Civil Airports analysis and process has been given. Association Analysis The majority of stakeholders can broadly accept the proposed draft ERs as a good basis. Many of them propose improvements to the text. These proposed improvements have been analysed individually and separately in the Annex to the CRD. On the contrary, a significant minority is of the opinion that the proposed ER are not a good basis either because they are too general or too detailed. A few stakeholders do not regard draft ER as a good basis specifically for their activity. In any case an overwhelming majority stressed the need for clear definitions and clear scope of the regulation, as well as for proportionate requirements addressed to “small” aerodromes. Inventory - CRD to NPA-06-2006 page 5 of 43 Question 2 on rescue and fire fighting The Agency also welcomes any suggestion to improve these essential requirements, in particular as regards the requirements for rescue and fire fighting services. Comment From Nature number 0012 KLM These stakeholders have commented the issue of Rescue and Fire 0173 BAA Aberdeen Airport Fighting Services (RFFS) stressing for a need to follow exactly the 0199 BAA Central Airside line taken by ICAO in this matter. Operations 0218 BAA Heathrow 0266 Fraport 0331 EGU 0449 Teuge Airport 0470 Peter Stratten 0712 John Brady 0728 AMS Schiphol Airport 0969 Avinor AS 1094 CAA Sweden 1146 ACI Europe 1188 Finavia 1276 FOCA Switzerland 1287,1288 Dutch Civil Airports Association 0030 Air League These stakeholders have commented the issue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Authority & Airport List.Xlsx
    Airport Consultative SASIG Authority Airport(s) of Interest Airport Link Airport Owner(s) and Shareholders Airport Operator C.E.O or M.D. Committee - YES/NO Majority owner: Regional & City Airports, part of Broadland District Council Norwich International Airport https://www.norwichairport.co.uk/ Norwich Airport Ltd Richard Pace, M.D. Yes the Rigby Group (80.1%). Norwich City Cncl and Norfolk Cty Cncl each own a minority interest. London Luton Airport Buckinghamshire County Council London Luton Airport http://www.london-luton.co.uk/ Luton Borough Council (100%). Operations Ltd. (Abertis Nick Barton, C.E.O. Yes 90% Aena 10%) Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd (formerly BAA):- Ferrovial-25%; Qatar Holding-20%; Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec-12.62%; Govt. of John Holland-Kaye, Heathrow Airport http://www.heathrow.com/ Singapore Investment Corporation-11.2%; Heathrow Airport Ltd Yes C.E.O. Alinda Capital Partners-11.18%; China Investment Corporation-10%; China Investment Corporation-10% Manchester Airports Group plc (M.A.G.):- Manchester City Council-35.5%; 9 Gtr Ken O'Toole, M.D. Cheshire East Council Manchester Airport http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/ Manchester Airport plc Yes Manchester authorities-29%; IFM Investors- Manchester Airport 35.5% Cornwall Council Cornwall Airport Newquay http://www.newquaycornwallairport.com/ Cornwall Council (100%) Cornwall Airport Ltd Al Titterington, M.D. Yes Lands End Airport http://www.landsendairport.co.uk/ Isles of Scilly Steamship Company (100%) Lands End Airport Ltd Rob Goldsmith, CEO No http://www.scilly.gov.uk/environment- St Marys Airport, Isles of Scilly Duchy of Cornwall (100%) Theo Leisjer, C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Robin Hood and Doncaster Sheffield Feasibility and Options Report
    ATC Services Ltd. DONCASTER PIR Robin Hood and Doncaster Sheffield Feasibility and Options Report All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Liverpool John Lennon Airport. © 2015 Liverpool John Lennon Airport Doncaster PIR Page 1 of 46 Owner: TSM 3rd February 2015 ATC Services Ltd. DONCASTER PIR Executive Summary Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield (RHADS) is a regional airport that developed from a former Royal Air Force (RAF) base known as RAF Finningley. The first commercial flight at the Airport was in 2005. In 2006, RHADS submitted an application for controlled airspace (CAS) in order to provide protection to the commercial air transport (CAT) flights operating in and out of the airport, and to connect the airport to the adjacent airways structure. The Airport lies in a unique position virtually surrounded on all four sides by small Light and General Aviation (LA and GA) airfields. This made routing CAT under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), nominally under a Deconfliction Service (DS), extremely challenging. In 2008, the CAA approved Class D CAS for RHADS, which provided a Control Zone (CTR) and associated Terminal Control Areas (CTAs). The Airspace Change Proposal attracted objections from a variety of stakeholders, each staking a legitimate claim to continue to operate without the restrictions and control measures that CAS brings. The majority of those who objected removed their objection following further consultation with RHADS and the development of formal agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Aviation Fuel Markets in Jersey and Guernsey Redacted
    Review of the aviation fuel markets in Jersey and Guernsey Redacted version Document No: CICRA 14/58 November 2014 Guernsey Competition and Regulatory Authority Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority Suites B1 & B2, Hirzel Court, 2nd Floor Salisbury House, St Peter Port, Guernsey, GY1 2NH 1-9 Union Street, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RF Tel: +44 (0)1481 711120 Tel: +44 (0)1534 514990 Web: www.cicra.gg Web: www.cicra.je 1 Contents EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW & SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………1 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 2. BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………6 3. VOLUMES & PRICES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 4. COST ANALYSIS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 5. BARRIERS TO ENTRY………………………………..………………………………………………………………………….18 6. CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 7. RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………….………………………………………………………………………20 Annex 1 Terms of Reference Annex 2 Detailed Netback analysis of fuel products Annex 3 Previous Reports Annex 4 FRAND – Fair Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory terms 2 Executive Overview This review of the supply of aviation fuel in Jersey and Guernsey was conducted by the Channel Islands Competition and Regulatory Authorities (CICRA) in response to a request from the Minister for Economic Development in Jersey and the Commerce and Employment Board in Guernsey1. Background At the time of the review, FSCI (Fuel Supplies CI Limited) was the sole supplier of aviation fuel at Jersey and Guernsey airports. However since the beginning of September, there have been significant changes to the fuel supply arrangements at Jersey Airport. Prior to this change, FSCI operated the airport fuel facilities at each airport, and was the single importer, retailer and distributor of aviation fuel in Jersey and Guernsey. Two grades of aviation fuel are used in the Channel Islands; Jet A1 (also known as kerosine/kerosene) used by jet or turbo-prop aircraft, and Avgas (also known as gasoline) used for private or light aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • "Airports" (PDF)
    Specialist services for the airport life cycle Let's talk aeronautics Specialist services for the airport life cycle AERTEC provides specialist Aviation consultancy and design services to a wealth of Aviation- sector clients, including airport operators, construction firms, service providers, airlines, government agencies, investors, and financial aeronautics institutions. Our company also provides consultancy services and solutions development for Airport Technological Systems. Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport Spain Let's talk Let's M A D We create value for Aviation clients Consultancy through integrated Conception services and independent specialist advice Operations Development Operational Planning assessment & Design Airport Technology #Airports Our Services Feasibility studies Airport solutions for landside/airside and analysis Studies and plans ¬ Policy and sector studies ¬ Airport masterplanning ¬ Air transport market studies ¬ Feasibility studies ¬ Traffic forecasting ¬ Airport planning studies ¬ Business advisory ¬ Aeronautical safety studies ¬ Transaction support ¬ Design of flight procedures and Consultancy and due diligence airspace compatibility studies ¬ Obstacle limitation surface studies ¬ Operational safety studies ¬ Capacity studies: airside and landside Brussels South Charleroi Airport Planning & Design ¬ Aircraft flow simulations (AirTop/Simmod/AeroTURN) C R L Belgium ¬ Passenger flow simulations (AirTop/CAST) ¬ Aircraft noise contour studies (AEDT) ¬ Airport planning application Airfields ¬ Preliminary plans,
    [Show full text]
  • Jennifer Miller Contact Core Skills Qualifications Likes
    WEB & CREATIVE DESIGN JENNIFER MILLER & PROJECT MANAGEMENT CV CONTACT CORE SKILLS QUALIFICATIONS LIKES AND INTERESTS 160a High Street Adobe Photoshop GNVQ Art & Design Art and design Maldon Adobe Illustrator Braintree College Painting Essex Adobe inDesign 2000 - 2002 Glass CM9 5BA Microsoft office Textiles Adobe inDesign Digital 0787 403 9052 Joomla Adobe Illustrator Wordpress Adobe Photoshop Sailing [email protected] CSS Exeter College 2012 - Instruction HTML - Racing Portfolio: Windsurfing www.d-eye.co.uk/portfolio Presenting / Pitching Paddleboarding Logo design Brand guidelines Dancing, singing & acting Website wireframing & responsive design - Pantomine Project management for web development - Musicals and design - Wedding Band Singer Concept generation & development Market research Client training Experience in Server administration (Linux) Mysql Vtiger CRMs WEB & CREATIVE DESIGN JENNIFER MILLER & PROJECT MANAGEMENT CV CAREER HISTORY PROFILE BRANDS WORKED ON Design Eye Jennifer Miller. Designer, with a life long enthusiasm and passion for Design. Gatwick Airport, Birmingham Airport, 2013 - 2018 Southampton Airport, Glasgow Airport, For the past 6 years I have been working as a website and creative Cardiff Airport, Newquay Airport Clystnet Web Development designer and as project manager with many top UK companies. Aberdeen Airport, London Southend Airport 2013 - 2018 Specialising in websites, branding and web development. Belfast International Airport, Belfast City Airport, Exeter Airport, Broadclyst Primary School Working both independently with clients as well as with other Designers, Leeds Airport, Derry Airport 2013 - 2017 Creative Directors and Account Executives in working up concepts and Guernsey Airport, Jersey Airport, visuals, amending and progressing designs. I have an approachable, easy Rezcomm CRM, Rezcomm B2B website, The Cornerstone Teaching Academy manner and am confident at presenting my work.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 GUERNSEY AIRPORT ANNUAL REPORT - 2015 Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Review of 2015 6 o Guernsey Passenger & Aircraft Statistics 6 o Major Incidents 7 o Pavements Project Update 8 o Management & General Highlights 8 Appendices 10 o 1). Financial Details 10 o 2). Organisation Structure 12 o 3). Acknowledgements & Contact Details 12 2 GUERNSEY AIRPORT ANNUAL REPORT - 2015 1). Executive Summary 2015 was a year of consolidation and a restoration of ‘business as usual ’ at Guernsey Airport, following a few years of significant change. 2014 had seen a major upheaval of carriers and routes and some impacts of those continued in our statistics through Q1 2015, at least until we passed the annual anniversary of these changes in March. This period of consolidation also enabled us to embark on other projects that had taken a lower priority, including the launch of our new website, publication of our Business Plan for the period 2015 – 2025 and a full emergency exercise which was held in November 2015 after a short delay while project works were underway. Significant events of the year included: Other keyOverall events passenger in the year numbers are summarised throughout below, the withyear moreremained detail remarkably following in cons thisis report.tent, albeit slightly down (-0.4%) on 2014. Passenger movements to and from the UK achieved a new high point last year with 80% of our passengers moving to and from the UK. Aircraft movements decreased over the year with fewer, fuller and larger aircraft operating in 2015 than in 2014. Total aircraft movements for the year 2015 were 7% lower than in 2014, and 20% less than in 2013, marking in stark terms the move to larger fleet sizes over the past 24 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Prevention November 1999
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 56 No. 11 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight November 1999 Unaware of Strong Crosswind, Fokker Crew Loses Control of Aircraft on Landing During approach to Guernsey, United Kingdom, the pilots of the Fokker F27 received a report containing an average of wind-speed values recorded over a two-minute period. They did not request a report of instantaneous wind speed. Thus, the pilots did not know that sudden, strong gusts exceeded the crosswind limit in the company operations manual. The aircraft touched down about mid-field, according to witnesses, then overran the end of the runway, veered left and struck an embankment. FSF Editorial Staff At 1818 local time Dec. 7, 1997, a Fokker F27 Mark The aircraft was operated by Air UK (now KLM UK) 500 was destroyed during a landing at Guernsey and was scheduled for four round-trip flights between Airport, Channel Islands, United Kingdom. The Guernsey and Southampton, England. (The Channel aircraft touched down past the normal touchdown Islands are off the coast of France, approximately zone on a wet runway, encountered a strong 190 kilometers [118 nautical miles] south-southwest crosswind, exited the end of the runway and struck of Southampton, which is on the southern coast of an embankment. Four of the 54 occupants received England.) minor injuries. The captain, 50, had an airline transport pilot (ATP) The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) license and 14,000 flight hours, including 2,865 flight said, in its final report, that the investigation hours in type.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ATP, SE-MHE No & Type of Engines: 2 Pratt & Whitney Canada PW126 Turboprop Engines
    AAIB Bulletin: 12/2018 SE-MHE EW/C2018/02/02 SERIOUS INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd ATP, SE-MHE No & Type of Engines: 2 Pratt & Whitney Canada PW126 turboprop engines Year of Manufacture: 1989 (Serial no: 2012) Date & Time (UTC): 14 February 2018 at 0700 hrs Location: In flight from East Midlands to Guernsey Airport Type of Flight: Commercial Air Transport (Cargo) Persons on Board: Crew - 2 Passengers - None Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - N/A Nature of Damage: None Commander’s Licence: Airline Transport Pilot’s Licence Commander’s Age: 42 Commander’s Flying Experience: 8,500 hours (of which 6,500 were on type) Last 90 days - 84 hours Last 28 days - 22 hours Information Source: AAIB Field Investigation Synopsis The aircraft was carrying out a cargo flight from East Midlands Airport to Guernsey Airport. As the aircraft commenced its descent from FL180, the ball in the slip indicator moved out to the left as normal and the pilot under training attempted to trim it back into the centre. He was unable to do so, and the autopilot disconnected automatically, causing a significant left bank and a nose-down attitude. The commander took control, closed the power levers and returned the aircraft to a safe flightpath. He had difficulty moving the flight controls and could not advance the power levers, believing both to have frozen due to ice. As the aircraft descended, the flight controls and power levers returned to normal and a safe landing was carried out. It is possible that the initial control upset was the result of the crew applying aileron trim instead of rudder trim whilst attempting to correct the yaw.
    [Show full text]
  • From 10,000 Sq Ft up to 1 Million Sq Ft B1, B2 & B8
    FROM 10,000 SQ FT UP TO 1 MILLION SQ FT B1, B2 & B8 OPPORTUNITIES EVERYTHING CONNECTS DEMOGRAPHICS: POPULATION CATCHMENT • 1.6 MILLION POPULATION WITHIN 30 MILE RADIUS MELTON WEST AT 200 ACRES ENTERPRISE ZONE STATUS: OF MELTON WEST OF WHICH 1 MILLION ARE IN THE WORKING AGE BRACKET OF 16 TO 64. Melton West offers a business rates discount IS ONE OF YORKSHIRE which is worth up to £275,000 per business EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE AND HUMBER’S LARGEST over a 5 year period. Further business grants and support maybe available. • 162,000 ARE ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE BUSINESS PARKS, • 147,300 ARE EDUCATED TO NVQ2 AND ABOVE • AVERAGE GROSS WEEKLY PAY RATES OF £552.1 STRATEGICALLY LOCATED (NATIONAL AVERAGE £571.1) • AVERAGE HOURLY PAY RATES OF £12.03 ON THE A63, WEST OF HULL. (NATIONAL AVERAGE £14.35) 85,000 sq ft 120,000 sq ft 160,000 sq ft 230,000 sq ft OFFICES 75,000 sq ft 70,000 sq ft 50,000 sq ft 70,000 sq ft 210,000 sq ft 120,000 sq ft 35,000 sq ft 51,000 sq ft 25,000 sq ft 22,000 sq ft 103,000 sq ft 43,000 sq ft MERCEDES 29,000 sq ft 68,000 sq ft DEALERSHIP 18,000 sq ft READY Q1 2020 87,000 sq ft 55,000 sq ft 55,000 sq ft 72,000 sq ft 55,000 sq ft 92,000 sq ft 51,000 sq ft 39,000 sq ft 43,000 sq ft TRADE COUNTER 104,000 sq ft UNITS 42,000 sq ft 25,000 sq ft 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Cardiff Airport's Performance And
    Y Pwyllgor Cyfrifon Cyhoeddus / Public Accounts Committee PAC(5)-08-20 P2 BRIEFING PAPER A REVIEW OF CARDIFF AIRPORT’S PERFORMANCE AND PROSPECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT UK REGIONAL AIRPORT ECONOMICS Prepared by February 2020 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Historical Perspectives 3 Recent Achievements 4 Benchmarking Financial Performance 5 Future Plans, Ambitions and Ownership 6 Conclusions Executive Summary I This paper was commissioned by Cardiff International Airport Ltd (CIAL) from Northpoint Aviation, in order to provide independent expert evidence with which to: Apprise CIAL’s Board and the Airport’s shareholder about a number of matters relating to the Airport that have arisen in the public domain; address the ongoing close scrutiny of its performance (and its public ownership by the Welsh Government), by Welsh Assembly committees and members, and respond to the significant interest shown by other strategic stakeholders, including local MPs, the media and Welsh taxpayers. II It will also help to inform CIAL’s representations to the impending UK Government Regional Aviation Review and ongoing discussions between the Welsh Government and the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales, HM Treasury and DfT about the devolution of APD to Wales, route development from Cardiff and other initiatives which may contribute to maximising the connectivity and economic value of the Airport to Wales. Introduction III The paper provides an overview of Cardiff Airport’s recent performance under CIAL and compares it with that under its previous owners Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A; it also benchmarks Cardiff relative to peer airports elsewhere in the UK over the last 10-15 years with a view to: Measuring Cardiff’s outputs against both the best and worst in class; explaining the factors in Wales that impact significantly upon that analysis (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 400 Hz September 2020 1 of 28
    LIST OF REFERENCES ‐ 400 Hz September 2020 1 of 28 End‐user Segment Product Units Location Year Algiers Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 23 Algeria 2017 BOU‐SAÂDA Helicopter Hangar Airport 2300 ‐ 60 kVA 4 Algeria 2014 Air Algerie Airline 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Air Algerie Airline 2400 ‐ 180 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Protection civile Defence 2400 ‐ 30 kVA w/ARU 2 Algeria 2020 Protection civile Defence 2400 ‐ 30 kVA 2 Algeria 2019 Aerolineas Airline 2400 ‐ 60 kVA 1 Argentina 2020 Aerolineas Airline 2400 ‐ 30 kVA 1 Argentina 2016 Austral Airlines Airline 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 1 Argentina 2017 Brisbane Airport Airport 7400 ‐ 90 kVA 1 Australia 2018 Brisbane Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 8 Australia 2013 Darwin Airport Airport 7400 ‐ 90 kVA 5 Australia 2019 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2018 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 9 Australia 2018 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 2 Australia 2017 Melbourne Airport Airport 2400 ‐ 90 kVA 11 Australia 2014 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 22 Australia 2011 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 10 Australia 2011 Melbourne Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2009 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 4 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2400 ‐ Power Coil 8 Australia 2017 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ 90 kVA w/TRU 14 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 21 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil 2 Australia 2013 Perth Airport Airport 2300 ‐ Power Coil
    [Show full text]
  • Humberside International Airport Handles Some 0.5Mppa
    Humberside Airport Master Plan March 2007 Master Plan 2007 – 2030 www.humbersideairport.com Foreword by Rob Goldsmith I am pleased to introduce this Master Plan – the first of its kind to be produced for Humberside Airport, which outlines how we at Humberside plan to develop the Airport over the next decade and beyond. In these plans, we want to be as open as possible about what we are doing and why we are doing it. Humberside Airport is an important transport facility, developing steadily to serve the air travel needs of Yorkshire, the Humber and Lincolnshire sub- regions. The preparation of this Master Plan illustrates how we see the Airport developing over the next 25 years and underlines our commitment to the long-term sustainable development of the Airport. Our vision for Humberside Airport is to be the first airport of choice for business and leisure customers of our region through superior customer service and improving products. Passenger traffic at UK airports is forecast to grow substantially over the next 15 years. Our current forecasts indicate that by 2015 we could be handling approximately 1 million passengers per year. More than 700 people already work on the Airport site and contribute over £14 million to the local economy each year. Our portfolio of routes in 2006 offered our passengers more choice than ever, with flights serving more than 30 international destinations, including 4 daily flights to Amsterdam, Schiphol Airport, which offers our local communities connections to over 300 worldwide destinations right on their doorstep. Our plans are in line with the growth in air travel projected by the Government’s 2003 Air Transport White Paper and are consistent with its policy for airport development.
    [Show full text]