~-~.\ift.it-127 / 81-7-202G-49(q1rt) /2017 Wrc5, 'l1ffif JffiTG. 3Tj~, /\. ~I (~ \3"OJW ~tLitJo') ~ ~I»'V'\P J Wu -ij, t ~:0~~1~':r ~,~' Qr/L. O~'S.,.", "11~ rn>f, ~ ~ ~ ~~HC1 «:~W1. 7· lifO'i5lll "l1c, ~ ~-110002 I • 411rq'(ul, q.:r ~ \JIclqlg 4Rqd'1 ~G-7 cl&'1\'b: ~'1i1 ~ IC1 II cpl 'iI~ Cfj ~ 3lmm ~ fc!;<) \i'IT'l cf; ~tT -ij I , +1i>ICill. ~ fctq-1?! IC'I II "$I "11~ 'iIR1 Cfj tcJq;- -q fW1" "ll"it Pi 01111 cf; l~C1 ~ * 9>"iuffc1lCfj'(ol -gg ~ III !.f "ffi.>rr.l Cj)'(" ~ "$I \iff m t I .ticl·'1 B"Cf\l ~ "4?1" ~"iiCf) 19.02.2020 *~ -q 'iiil"il>!.f ~ I

, o < fr ms

m ;ffi;;!:rr- 6.-2>2.. v2>o /

q10M'! 0 I, CFf ~ \Ji C1 q 1-:; qRq d<1 fctl:wr, ~-1, \jQ1fO ~ I

fcl"tr ~ 31m!IT ~ fclm urR cf; ~ -q I

\jqx'ICffi fcl'lllCl> +j1<1"'~ll 'Roultotl"o, ~ ~ -q fcltlli(I't1Trr 31TO~O ~O- 673/2018 If

1JTfur ~ cf; ~ ~ ~ ...')1I 3fj~ ~, \jffi -wm J1?1IC1l1 CI5t ~i2:fl1 +jl~q; ~ If fB ~ 3fRS

~ 4I<~tj c 3lf4) CfTC'(" Rtl)ffftl, ft Ii(, ~ ~ em- ~ ~ cnr ~ ~ I tlC1l<1Q; ~~ I

._.._------_..__..._----_.--_....------....._----_.------_....------t\..tl 12 ;ft. ~ ,..". Teo 12V Vibhuti Khand, 'll>!

Format for Submission ofMonthly Progress Report by StatesfUTs (Hon'ble NGT in the matter of OA No. 673/2018 dated 06.12.2019

S.No. Activity to be monitored Timeline Submission ofProgress by StatelUT-Compliance Status I Ensure 100 % treatment of 31.03.2020 325 No. ofdrains being sewage at least in-situ identified along the remediation polluted river stretches of which bio remediation technique being adopted in 42 drains only. commencement ofsetting up of 31.03.2020 Action is being taken. STPs and connecting all the drains and other sources of generation ofsewage to the STPs must be ensured 2 Timeline for completing all steps 31.03.2021 Polluted River Stretch wise ofaction plans including details oftimeline for completion ofsetting up STPs setting up ofSTPs is and their commissioning enclosed. Annexure-I 5 ChiefSecretaries may set up 22.01.2020 Three tier monitoring appropriate monitoring mechanism developed and mechanism at State level functional. Details are • Specifying accountability of annexed as annexure- II nodal authorities not below the Secretary level • ChiefSecretaries may have 22.01.2020 an accountable person attached in their office for this purpose. • Monitoring at State level Fortnightly As above. must take place Commencing 21.12.2019 6 Progress report may be furnished MontWy by the States/UTs to (preferably • Secretary, Ministry ofJal before 20th of Shakti every month) • Member Secretary, CPCB 6.1 Progress Report may be • There are 1616 comprised of details along with industries located in the completion timelines on : catchment area of (i) Identification ofPolluting polluted river stretches sources including drains out ofwhich 137 units contributing to river are lying closed due to pollution and action as per closure order and show NGT order on insitu notices issued to 81 treatment units. • 325 No. of drains are identified in the catchment area of polluted river stretches.

(ii) Status of STPs, I&D and Detailed report enclosed as sewerage networks Details referred in point no 2 as ofExisting Infrastructure, Annexure- I Gap Analysis, Proposed along with completion timeline (iii) Status of CETPs Details ofExisting CETP and ETP Infrastructure, Gap Analysis Proposed along with completion timeline, No. of industries and complying status (iv) Status ofSolid Waste Details annexed as Management & Details of annexure- III Processing Facilities Details ofExisting Infrastructure, Gap Analysis, Proposed along with completion timeline The data monitored at 88 (v) Latest water quality of polluted river, its locations reflects BOD tributaries, drains with reduction less than 3mg/L flow details and ground at 15 locations. The percent water quality in the reduction in BOD value catchment ofpolluted lies between 0.2 to 36.4 %. river; Details annexed as annexure- IV (vi) Preventing dumping of Details annexed as waste and scientific waste annexure- V management including bio-medical wastes, plastic wastes and decentralizing waste processing, including waste generated from hotels, ashrams, etc. (vii) Ground water regulation Details annexed as annexure- VI (viii) Adopting good llTigation practices,

(ix) Protection and Details annexed as management ofFlood annexure- VII Plain Zones (FPZ), (x) Rain water harvesting, (xi) Maintaining minimum Details annexed as environment flow ofriver annexure- VIII

(xii) Plantation on both sides of Details annexed as the river annexure- IX

(xiii) Setting up biodiversity The Ministry Environment, parks on flood plains by Forest and Climate Change removing encroachment Department ofUttar Pradesh has identified the sites for development of Bio-diversity Park in 25 districts in the main stem Ganga and in 02 districts in covering a total area of3591.984 ha. The project proposals for development ofBio- diversity Parks are prepared nnder the supervision ofProf. C.R. Babu, Former Pro Vice Chancellor, University of Delhi/Emeritus Professor, CEMDE/Incharge, Yamuna Bio-diversity Park and his scientific team. The total cost ofthe projects for development of Bio-diversity Parks in the above mentioned 27 districts in the main stem Ganga and its tributaries is Rs. 32381.755 lacs. The State Mission for Clean Ganga, Uttar Pradesh has forwarded these proposals to National Mission for Clean Ganga, New Delhi for perusal and consideration ofapproval vide its letter dated 05.12.2019. Annexure-I STP Status and Gap Analysis

~ The detailed time line for STP construction / treatment of sewage has been given in the table. It is proposed to undertake treatment using STPs & in-situ method of NEERI. The project of STPs will be implemented in 24 months of sanction and the OPR will be prepared in 6 months of sanction of the OPR cost which is 4% of the project cost. The project cost on average will be Rs. 2.0 Crore per MLO. It is also pertinent to mention that in compliance of the order of NGT in a.A. No: 200/2014 case of M.e. Mehta in which order has been passed to start biD-remediation from 1st November, 2019 failing which penalty will be imposed. A DPR for 459 drains on 11 rivers costing Rs. 1700 crare has been submitted in the NMCG. The above project has not been sanctioned, so work has not begun yet

CITY ESTiMAT WATER SEWAGE IJ\ISTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple ~ POPULA TION TION CAPACI STP CAPACIT tion of '1: .,.. 0 " TlON (MLD) (MLD) TYOP CAPACI Y STPsto '1: ii1 2030 (@135 EXISTI TY UTlUZA meet '" LPCD) NGSTP (MLD) TlON the Gap [MLDl [MLDl I Sahranpur 969002 130.82 104.65 38 93.65 N/A Muzaffarna 519184 70.09 56.07 32.5 32 N/A gar Shamli 141791 19.14 15.31 N/A N/A 15.31 March, e: 2022 0 '0 March, e: Sardhana' 74732 10.09 8.07 N/A N/A 8.07 :2 [Meerut] 2022 Baghpat 61733 8.33 6.67 N/A 14 Nil March, 2021 Ghaziabad 2943273 397.34 317.87 454 N/A N/A Total 4709715 635.81 508.65 524.5 139.65 23.48 Khatauli 96428 13.02 10.41 N/A N/A 10.41 March. 2022 Meerut 1674748 226.09 180.87 168 200 N/A HAPUR 469346 63.36 50.69 N/A 80 N/A Z' GHAZIABA 232085 31.33 25.07 N/A 20 5.07 March, OJ'" D (MODI 2022 ~'" ;;; AGAR] :<: BULANDSH 76026 10.26 8.21 N/A 7 1.21 March, AHAR 2000 (GALAOTHI i Total 2548633 344.07 275.25 168 307 16.69 G.B. Nagar 2810184 379.37 303.5 196 NA 107.5 March, '"e: 2022 "e Aligarh 1252869 169.14 135.31 NA 45 :;:. Hathras 179700 24.26 19.41 NA NA 19.41 March, 2022 CITY ESTIMAT WATER SEWAGE INSTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple 'Ce- .. POPULA TJON nON CAPACI STP CAPACIT tion of 0 ~ TJON (MLD) (MLD) TYOF CAPACI Y STPsto 'C .. 2030 (@135 EXISTI TV UTILIZA meet = LPCD) NGSTP (MLD) nON the Gap IMLDl IMLDl Mathura 501357 67.68 54.15 58.85 30 NA Agra 2250035 303.75 243 223 175 NA Firozabad 853217 115.18 92.15 67 67 NA Etawah 345409 46.63 37.3 23.95 21 NA Kalp! 67564 9.12 7.3 NA NA 7.3 March, 2022 Hamirpur 42343 5.72 4.57 NA NA 4.57 March. 2022 Rajapur. 20954 2.83 2.26 NA 3.42 Chitrakoot Prayagraj 1548628 209.06 167.25 268 72 Total 98,72,25 1332.76 1066.2 618.8 413 138.78 9 II Sitapur 2,57,649 34.78 27.83 NIL NIL 27.83 March. I 2022 Sandila* 81,005 10.94 8.75 NIL NIL NA Lucknow 41,99,120 566.88 755.5** 438 326 NIL Barabanki 2,08,446 28.14 22.51 NIL NIL 22.51 March, 2022 .'"S jagdishpur 33130 4.47 3.58 NIL NIL 3.58 March, 0 2021 <:> suitanpur 1,44,678 19.53 15.63 5 17 NIL launpur 2,31,388 31.24 24.99 NIL 30 NIL Kerakat 17,351 2.34 1.87 NIL NIL 1.87 March, 2021 Total 51,72,76 698.32 860.66 443 373 55.79 7 I Moradabad 1313321 177.3 141.84 58* 99 Nil V Rampur 457709 61.79 49.43 34' Nil 15.43 March, 2022 Bareilly 1297369 175.14 140.12 NA 98" 42.12 March. 2022 '"bI) Shahjahanp No drain either domestic or industrial or mixed flows into river "b"o ur in these Districts. Hence there is no contribution ofpollution § Farrukhaba load into river Ramganga from these 4 Districts. d '" Hardo; Kannauj Total 3068399 414.23 331.39 92' 197 57.55 V jhansi 605000 81.6 65.28 N/A 26 39.28 March, 2022 ~ Hamirpur 45000 6.1 4.8 N/A 0 4.8 March, co.. 2022 Total 650000 87.7 70.08 0 26 44.08 CITY ESTIMAT WATER SEWAGE INSTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple .e-;:: .. POPULA TlON TION CAPACI STP CAPACIT tion of ~ TION (MLD) (MLD) TV OF CAPACI y STPsto 'C" 2030 (@135 EXISTI TV UTlLI2A meet '" " LPCD) NGSTP (MLDl TION the Gap IMLDl fMLDl Town area 52586 7.9 6.32 0 0 6.32 March. Barhahzani 2021 Town are 29143 3.93 3.14 0 0 3.14 March. Dohari 2021 Ghat, ~ Nagar 90053 12.15 9.72 0 0 9.72 March, .c 00 Palika 2021 ro .c Gaura " Barhai Village 17941 2,42 1.93 0 0 1.93 March, Panchayat, 2021 Bhagalpur Total 189723 26,4 21,11 0 0 21,11 Ra 6,73,446 121,68 97,34 NJA 168 No Gap vti Raebareli 258782 34.94 27.95 No 18 9.95 March, existing 2022 STP 'iii V> Pratapgarh 101447 13.7 10.96 8.95· -- 2.01 March, 2021 Total 360229 48,63 38,9 8.95 18 11.96

Ayodhya 75323 10.17 8.13 12 - Nil Town Faizabad 222678 30.06 24.05 - 35 Nil City "[:- oj IItifatganj. 1.91 Nil 1.91 March, V> 17703 2.38 Nil Ambedkar 2021 Na.ar Total 315704 42.61 34.09 12 35 1.91 Grand Total 27560875 3752.21 3303.67 1867 1067 313.8 Annexure-II

Monitoring Mechanism for implementation of pollution Control Action Plans:- a) That the State Government of Uttar Pradesh has formulated

a comprehensive monitoring mechanism with well-defined

monitoring protocol. The Monitoring mechanism developed

by the State is a three-tier mechanism in which regular

monitoring shall be done at District level and at State level.

The monitoring at State is being undertaken at the level of

dedicated monitoring committees under the chairmanship of

Agriculture Production Commissioner/Principal Secretaries

and subsequently by the Chief Secretary, Government of

Uttar Pradesh. The structure of Monitoring is as detailed

below: -

A. At State Level:

The State Government of Uttar Pradesh has developed

monitoring mechanism taking into consideration the

requirement of statutes and Action Plans. The detail of

various Monitoring Committees constituted by State of Uttar

Pradesh is as follows: s. Name of Chairperson Work area No. Committee 1 State Level Waste Additional Chief Compliance of Management Secretary/ Waste Monitoring Principal Secretary Management Committee Urban Rules Development 2 Implementation Additional Chief Monitoring of Committee- Secretary/ various pollution Ganga Principal Secretary sources and Environment, Conservation of Forest & Climate river Ganga Change 3 Air Quality Additional Chief Effective Air Monitoring Secretary/ Pollution Control Committee Principal Secretary in the State and Environment, maintenance of Forest & Climate Ambient Air Change Qualitv 4 River Agriculture Monitoring of Rejuvenation Production various pollution Committee Commissioner sources and Conservation of all rivers in the State other than river Ganga

B. District and Commissioner Level- (i) A District Level Committee under the Chairmanship of respective District Magistrates has been constituted by a.M. No. 13/2019/NGT-257/55-Parya-2-2019­ 44(Writ)/2016 dated 14-06-2019 for monthly monitoring of all the Environmental issues and compliance of Environmental Laws.

(ii) The District Level Committee has 28 Officers of all the concerned District Level Departments.

(iii)District Forest Officer IS the convener of the Committee. c. The monitoring protocol shall be as below- (il The State has developed dedicated UP Environment Compliance Portal www.upecp.in for monitoring of various issues related to environmental compliances. (ii) The access of portal is given to Chief Secretary, State Level Monitoring Committees and the District Level Committee. (iii)Portal has been provided with dedicated Template for Online Filing of the Compliance Status to be reviewed at State Level by the State Level Committees. The issues requiring State Level intervention shall be flagged before the Chief Secretary, Uttar Pradesh. D. Schedule of Monitoring: Level of Monitoring Schedule of Monitoring

District Level Committee I st week of every under District Magistrates month District Level Committee 2nd week of every under Commissioner month

State Level Committees 3,d week of every month Chief Secretary Level 4th week of every month Annexure-J STP Status and Gap Analysis

~ The detailed time line for STP construction / treatment of sewage has been given in the table. It is proposed to undertake treatment using STPs & in-situ method of NEERI. The project of STPs will be implemented in 24 months of sanction and the OPR will be prepared in 6 months of sanction of the OPR cost which is 4% of the project cost. The project cost on average will be Rs. 2.0 Crore per MLO. It is also pertinent to mention that in compliance of the order of NGT in O.A. No: 200/2014 case of M.C. Mehta in which order has been passed to start bio-remediation from l't November, 2019 failing which penalty will be imposed. A OPR for 459 drains on 11 rivers costing Rs. 1700 crore has been submitted in the NMCG. The above project has not been sanctioned. so work has not begun yet.

CITY ESTIMAT WATHR SEWAGE INSTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple ~ ... POPULA TION TION CAPACI STP CAPACIT tionof 'C " T!ON (MLD) (MLD) TYOF CAPACI y STPsto 'C" ; 2030 (@135 EXIST! TY UTILIZA meet '" LPCD) NGSTP (MLD) nON the Gap [MLD) [MLDl I Sahranpur 969002 130.82 104.65 38 93.65 NJA Muzaffarna 519184 70.09 56.07 32.5 32 NJA gar Shamli 141791 19.14 15.31 NJA NJA 15.31 March. " 2022 " Sardhana· 74732 10.09 8.07 NJA NJA 8.07 March, .5 :I:'" [Meerutl 2022 Baghpat 61733 8.33 6.67 NJA 14 Nil March, 2021 Ghaziabad 2943273 397.34 317.87 454 NJA NJA Total 4709715 635.81 508.65 524.5 139.65 23.48 Khatauli 96428 13.02 10.41 NJA NJA 10.41 March. 2022 Meerut 1674748 226.09 180.87 168 200 NJA HAPUR 469346 63.36 50.69 NJA 80 NJA o;j' GHAZIABA 232085 31.33 25.07 NJA 20 5.07 March, '" D (MODI 2022 ~'"'" ~ AGAR) BULANDSH 76026 10.26 8.21 NJA 7 1.21 March, '" AHAR 2000 (GALAOTHI i Total 2548633 344.07 275.25 168 307 16.69 G.B. Nagar 2810184 379.37 303.5 196 NA 107.5 March, 2022 ":l'" E Aligarh 1252869 169.14 135.31 NA 45 >-'" Hathras 179700 24.26 19.41 NA NA 19.41 March. 2022 CITY ESTlMAT WATER SEWAGE INSTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple i:' POPULA TION TlON CAPACI STP CAPACIT tion of 'C .. 0 ~ TION (MLD) (MLDj TYOF CAPACI Y STPsto 'C 2030 (@135 EXISTI TV UTlLlZA meet '" = LPCDj NGSTP (MLD) TlON the Gap fMLD) (MLD) Mathura 501357 67.68 54.15 58.85 30 NA Agra 2250035 303.75 243 223 175 NA Firozabad 853217 115.18 92.15 67 67 NA Etawah 345409 46.63 37.3 23.95 21 NA Kalpi 67564 9.12 7.3 NA NA 7.3 March, 2022 Hamirpur 42343 5.72 4.57 NA NA 4.57 March. 2022 Rajapur, 20954 2.83 2.26 NA 3.42 Chitrakoot Prayagraj 1548628 209.06 167.25 268 72 Total 98,72,25 1332.76 1066.2 618.8 413 138.78 9 II Sitapur 2,57,649 34.78 27.83 NIL NIL 27.83 March, I 2022 Sandila* 81,005 10.94 8.75 NIL NIL NA Lucknow 41,99,120 566.88 755.5** 438 326 NIL Barabanki 2.08,446 28.14 22.51 NIL NIL 22.51 March, 2022 .'"S jagdishpur 33130 4.47 3.58 NIL NIL 3.58 March, 0 2021 " sultanpur 1,44,678 19.53 15.63 5 17 NIL launpur 2,3l.388 31.24 24.99 NIL 30 NIL Kerakat 17,351 2.34 1.87 NIL NIL 1.87 March, 2021 Total 51,72,76 698.32 860.66 443 373 55.79 7 I Moradabad 1313321 177.3 141.84 58* 99 Nil V Rampur 457709 61.79 49.43 34* Nil 15.43 March. 2022 Bareilly 1297369 175.14 140.12 NA 98** 42.12 March, 2022 '"Oll Shahjahanp No drain either domestic or industrial or mixed flows into river g'"" ur Ramganga in these Districts. Hence there is no contribution ofpollution S Farrukhaba load into river Ramganga from these 4 Districts. 0:'" d Hardoi Kannauj Total 3068399 414.23 331.39 92' 197 57.55 V )hansi 605000 81.6 65.28 N/A 26 39.28 March, 2022 ! Hamirpur 45000 6.1 4.8 N/A 0 4.8 March, 2022 CD'" Total 650000 87.7 70.08 0 26 44.08 CITY ESTlMAT WATER SEWAGE INSTAL PROPO GAP IN Date of ED CONSUMP GENERA LED SED STP Comple .C;:: ... POPULA nON TION CAPACI STP CAPACIT tion of .;::0 "> TION (MLD) (MLD) TYOF CAPACI Y STPsto i5l 2030 (@135 EXISTI TY UTILIZA meet "" LPCD) NGSTP (MLD) nON the Gap (MLDl lMLDl Town area 52586 7.9 6.32 0 0 6.32 March, Barhalgani 2021 Town are 29143 3.93 3.14 0 0 3.14 March. Dohari 2021 Ghat. March. '"~ Nagar 90053 12.15 9.72 0 0 9.72 .g, Palika 2021 .c'" Gaura " Barhai Village 17941 2.42 1.93 0 0 1.93 March, Panchayat 2021 Bhagalpur Total 189723 26.4 21.11 0 0 21.11 Ra 6,73,446 121.68 97.34 N/A 168 No Gap pti Raebareli 258782 34.94 27.95 No 18 9.95 March. existing 2022 .; STP on Pratapgarh 101447 13.7 10.96 8.95 • -- 2.01 March, 2021 Total 360229 48.63 38.9 8.95 18 11.96

Ayodhya 75323 10.17 8.13 12 - Nil Town Faizabad 222678 30.06 24.05 - 35 Nil ~ City March. on lltifatganj. 17703 2.38 1.91 Nil Nil 1.91 '" Ambedkar 2021 Nal!ar Total 315704 42.61 34.09 12 35 1.91 Grand Total 27560875 3752.21 3303.67 1867 1067 313.8 Status of CETPs

» Status of CETPs in the catchment area of critically polluted river stretches- Critically Name, Address of Capacity Sector Compliance Timeline Polluted CETP (MLD) Status required for River compliance Stretch Hindon Apparel Park 6 Textile Complying - Tronica City CETP, Phase-I (for textile units), Ghaziabad Yamuna CETP, Industrial 6.25 Textile Not Upgradation Area, Site-A, Complying proposed Mathura under Namami Gange Project forZLD. Ganga CETP. UPSIDC 1.55 Textile Complying - Textile Complex, Rooma, Kanpur (for textile units) Ganga CETP Iajmau, 36 Tannery Complying - Kanour Ganga Banther Industrial 4.55 Tannery Complying - Pollution Control Co. CETP, Banther, Unnao Ganga Unnao Tanneries 2.15 Tannery Complying - Pollution Control Company (CETP) Site-II, Unnao Annexure- III Municipal Solid Waste Management:­

I. Status of Solid Waste Management

a)That at present about 17,377 TPD Solid Waste is generated

in all 652 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). Door to Door

collection is being done in 11,675 wards out of total 12,007

wards (97%).

b)That 12 Municipal Solid Waste processing facilities are

functional with cumulative treatment capacity of 4,615 TPD

which is 26.5% of the total municipal solid waste generated.

That it is further submitted that there are 20 municipal

solid waste processing and disposal facilities are non­

operational due to land/operator dispute in the State which

has cumulative capacity of 3,355 TPD.

c)That door to door collection of municipal solid waste is done

in 11,675 wards out of 12,007 wards in the State. That all

the 652 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in the State have

become Open Defecation Free (ODF) and 104 ULBs have

been declared ODF+ and 04 ULBs ODF++.

d)That in 15 out of 17 Nagar Nigams, the Vehicle Tracking

System (VTS) has been installed and 3785 vehicles of these

Nagar Nigam are GPS enabled for monitoring of waste collection and transportation. In rest 02 Nagar Nigams, VTS

will be installed by March, 2020.

I. Action Plan for Solid Waste Management

a)That the State has formulated a time-bound action plan for

operation and development of municipal solid waste

processing and disposal facilities as detailed below:-

12 Plants with 4,615 TPD Existing SW Processing Facilities

03 Plants with 560 TPD Plants to be made operational (March 2020)

02 Plants with 335 TPD Plants to be made operational (June 2020)

07 Plants with 860 TPD Plants to be made operational

(Arbitration complete) (December 2020)

08 Plants with 930 TPD Plants under land dispute to be resolved and commissioned

37 Plants with 3,170 TPD New plants sanctioned to be completed (December 2020)

Material Recovery Facility Land identification and and decentralized Commissioning composting in 652 Urban (December 2020) Local Bodies (ULBs) with 6,907 TPD b)That the State has already released funds amounting to Rs.

627 Crore to 652 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) for setting up

of 01 Material Recovery Facility each and for strengthening

of waste collection and transport system including vehicles,

waste bins, protective gear etc. That it is further submitted

that the lease agreement for establishment of waste to

energy plants have been done for 02 cities namely

Muzaffarnagar and Ghaziabad which are scheduled to be

commissioned by December, 2021.

II. Remediation of Legacy Waste

a) That the State is also taking steps for remediation of legacy

waste. The legacy waste of about 1 Lac Ton lying in Sector­

54, Noida has been remediated and the site is cleared. The

remediation of legacy waste of about 3 Lac Ton in Gawli

Meerut has started and about 1 Lac Ton legacy waste has

already been remediated with scheduled completion by

March 2020. Similarly, the remediation of legacy waste of

about 1.1 Lac Ton in Sector-145 in Noida has also started

from October, 2019 and will be completed by June, 2020. In

Agra, agreement has been signed and work has started for

remediation of approximately 8 Lac ton legacy waste and the

remediation is projected to be completed by December,

2020. b) That the Request For Proposal (RFP) has already been

floated for remediation of legacy waste about 39 Lac Ton in

09 towns namely Kanpur, Prayagraj, Ghaziabad, Bareilly,

Aligarh, Lucknow, Mathura, Lalitpur and Moradabad which

is scheduled to be completed by December, 2020. The

remaining legacy waste in entire State is proposed to be

assessed and remediated within next 03 years.

III. Model Cities, Towns and Villages

a) That Lucknow, Mathura and Varanasi have been selected as

Model Cities in which action is being taken to make them

fully compliant of Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 by

October, 2020. Similarly, smaller towns Niwari, Shikohabad

and Budhana are also being developed as model towns for

solid waste management.

bl That the State is taking effective steps for compliance of

Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 m 58,755 Gram

Panchayats and 225 Gram Panchayats in 75 Districts (03 in

each District) have been selected as Model Gram

Panchayats. It is further submitted that out of 58,755 Gram

Panchayats, 10,696 Gram Panchyats have been made solid

waste free including 225 model Gram Panchayats. Annexure-IV

Percent change in water quality of River Hindon in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019 Percent change in Percent change in e~ e"" BOD values in year DO values in year S.No. Name ofLocation ~ ; '8 ~ ~ e ~ :ag ~ :.=g 2019 as compared 2019 as compared to o~ o~ e ~e ~ o! o! u-_Z u-_Z to year 2018 year 2018 0 ""0 0 ""0 "" <0 ...~~ "" <0 ...~~ DIS Maheshpur 1 Nil 49.0 Nil 44.6 -8.98 Nil Saharanpur - -

Sardhana ~Budhana 2 Road, Vill Baparsi. Nil 68.8 172583 Nil 69.9 155000 1.60 Nil Meerut

Meerut Baghpat 3 1.50 39.5 129083 1.6 42.3 128833 7.09 4.00 Road, Meerut

Karheda village, 4 1.66 31.9 28364 1.25 21.3 184183 -33.23 -24.70 Ghaziabad

Mohan Nagar Road 5 1.41 37.7 37333 1.0 29.7 43750 -21.22 -29.08 Bridge, Ghaziabad

Chijarsi Bridge, 6 Nil 66.3 201750 Nil 54.1 610833 -18.40 Nil Ghaziabad

DIS Kulsera Bridge. 7 Nil 60.0 264167 Nil 56.9 256667 -5.17 Nil Noida

Note: I-DO increased at 01 sampling Location. 2~ BOD decreased at 05 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Kali (East) in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019 5::::- e~ ~ ,,- ~ ::::- ~ 5 ~ ~ e bb ~ SNo Sample Collection Point 5 =~ :.::g e ~ 5 ~ " ... ~ ! " ... Q U-_01: Q U 0 0 0 0 z Q CXl ~~ Q CXl ~~ f-o~ {:. I Saini-Mawana Road, Meerut Nil 61.8 138417 Nil 54.5 110273 2 Garh Road, Meerut Nil 66.3 138333 Nil 55.7 127364 3 Kharkhoda Parikshit Road, Meerut Nil 65 175833 Nil 57.1 149091 4 Babugarh, Ghaziabad Nil 61.4 1038333 Nil 43.8 4236364 5 Vis Devioura, Bulandshahar Nil 43.7 239091 Nil 71.8 177273 6 Dis Mohan Kuter Bulandshahar Nil 45.2 201818 Nil 74 589364 Uls Kali River before wave disttlary, Ramghat, 7 Nil 65.9 2.4 31.9 Atmali, Aligarb - - Dis Kali River after wave disttlary, Ramghat, 8 Nil 70 2.3 34.4 Atruali, AJigarh - - 9 Nadrai Gate, Kasgani, Kashiram Nagar Nil 49.8 - 4.9 17.6 - 10 VIS Kannaui, Kanour 8.55 6.1 6450 7.6 4.8 9100 Percent change in water quality of River Varuna in term ofBiochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019 Percent change Pen-eot change E=- E;;:- in BOD values in DO values in Regional Sampling 6 oS 6 S.No. ~ ~ .s ~ ~ .- <:> in year 2019 as year 2019 as Office Stations :::g - Q 6 6 0_ compared to compared to .! is' U'- .! is' U 0 0 z 0 0 z year 2018 ye.r 2019 ~ ]~ Q -~~.. {!.~ '" '" ... ~

I At Rameshwar 7.97 3.36 2727 7.88 3.23 2683 -3.97 -1.16

Varanasi Varona Before 2 Meeting River 2.23 36.88 270833 2.97 22.22 167583 -39.76 32.99 Ganga

Note: I-DO increased at 01 sampling Location. 2- BOD decreased at 02 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Yamuna in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019

Percent change in Percent change in e=' ~ E'" BOD values in year DO values in year S.No. ~ ;5~ 0;; Name ofLocation B ~~ .! e~ .! 2019 as compared to 2019 as compared i Cl ~~.- 0 13 .~ 0 0 year 2018 to year 2019 '" '" ~ '" '" ~6

1 Uls Vrindavan 5.13 9.17 5.40 8.80 83000 -4.00 5.37 2 Uls Mathura 4.64 9.84 - 4.80 9.70 80000 -1.47 3.53 3 Shahpur, Mathura 3.11 13.46 109250 4.50 12.50 103417 -712 44.77 Vishram Ghat, 4 4.40 11.30 92083.333 4.80 11.00 88833 -2.65 9.09 Mathura 5 DIs Mathura 4.44 11.47 - 4.60 10.90 98000 -4.94 3.69

6 DIs Firozabad 5.7375 16.88 86000 7.4 16.70 - -1.04 28.98 7 VIs Etawah 5.92857143 15.00 88428.571 5.8 14.10 - -6.00 -2.17 B DIs Etawah 5.57142857 18.00 127142.86 5.9 16.00 - -ILlI 5.90 Note. I-DO mcreased at 11 samplmg LocatIOn. 2~ BOD decreased at 07 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Gomti in term ofBiochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxy~en in tbe year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019 e"" e"" Percent Change in .E e ~ ~ E BOD values in Percent Change in DO ~ "" :.=g' "" S.N•. Name of Location .. C>~ :..15C>~ year 2019 as values in year 2019 as .! .! ...! e Q U is" U~ compared to year compared to year 2018 0 0 z 0 0 Q "'0, Q "'0, 2018 ~6- ~ 'i;~ '" '" ... -

VIs Water Intake, 1 5.6 4.1 5117 6.9 3.2 19525 -21.92 22.70 Gaughat, Lucknow

Nishatganj Bridge, 2 2.6 10.3 52500 2.6 9.8 422917 -5.59 0.65 Lucknow

3 U/s Bairaj, Lucknow 2.6 II.l 115333 2.7 10.8 429083 -2.48 2.21

Dis Pipraghat, 4 1.7 13.5 132667 1.9 10.7 195750 -20.84 13.45 Lucknow

5 DIs Gomti, Jaunpuf 7.4 4.4 36333 7.4 3.8 20917 -13.63 0.11

Gomti before 6 meeting river Ganga, 7.8 3.8 19083 7.6 3.4 13450 -10.96 -3.56 Rajwarj, Varanasi

Note: I-DO increased at 06 sampling Location. 2- BOD decreased at 06 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Ganga in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019 e", Percent cbange in ~ e- Regional ~ ,gE 12 ..'" " e BOD values in year SNo DistTjct Sample Collection Point ,§. =2: .. ,§. :E8 Office ,§. 0- ,§. 0- 2019 as compared to Q Q U ci U:z ci z year 2018 Q Q ~~ ~ !~ g .... I Kanour Kannau Uls KaMali 8.40 3.52 3817 8.49 2.87 3817 -18.48 2 Kanour Kannau DIs Kannau 8.50 4.28 4675 8.12 3.30 4625 -22.96 3 KanDUT Kanour Bithoor, Kannur 8.35 3.34 4000 804 3.10 4100 -7.23 4 Kanour KanDUf At Bhairao Gbat 8.16 3.54 4308 7.85 3.10 4133 -12.47 5 Kanour ICanour Uls l(.mour 7.86 3.74 4608 7.95 ll3 4442 -16.48 6 !Canour Kanour At DIs Shuklaa-an" 7.52 4.08 5342 7.83 3.43 56)) -16.12 7 Kanour KanDur At Gol. Ghat 7.29 4.43 5650 7.56 3.72 6267 -16.01 8 Kanour KanDur At Jaimau Brid@c 6.78 5.48 11)42 7.58 3.98 21708 -27.36 9 Kannur Kanour Dis Kanour 5.95 6.93 79333 6.98 4.40 42250 -36.46 10 Raibareli Raibareli Dalmau Raibareli 9.05 3.88 7808 8.64 l65 3625 -5.81 II Raibarcli PrataoDarh Kala Kankar Pratanl:!arh 9.20 3.75 7667 8.68 3.62 3575 -356 12 PraV82ra" Koshambi Kada Ghat 857 3.98 24533 8.44 l08 20333 -22.80 13 Prava2raj Prav32Ta" U/s Pravaarai 8.94 3.64 21858 8.84 2.78 J7783 -23.57 14 Prav32Ta" PravalUa" DIs Prava9rni 853 3.57 19800 8.43 2.78 18450 -22.20 Ale Tamsa river, Sirsa, IS Prayagraj Prayagraj 8.36 3.08 15245 8.42 2.55 148)) -17.26 Son Bana

16 Sonbhadra Mirzapur VIs VindhycwhaJ, MirZllPur 8.1) 2.73 2550 8.21 2.68 1933 -21) At Chunnar Pontoon 17 Sonbhadra Sonbhadra 7.68 3.30 4909 7.88 3.23 11250 -2.02 Bridlle 18 Varanasi Varanasi VIs Varanasi 8.19 2.83 2658 8.19 2.64 1992 -6,76 19 Varanasi Varanasi D/sVaranasi 6.73 5.05 48583 7.06 3.83 32750 -24.26 20 Varanasi GhaziDur Tarighat DIs Ghaziour 7.23 4.45 41000 721 3.75 23583 -15.73

21 Varanasi Ghazipur Ale Gomti river, BhusauIa 7.96 3.35 25455 7.85 3.32 lJ500 -1.13 Note: Water Quality of River Gaoga 1mproved sigoutlcantly at 2I location. Percent change in water qnality of River Ramganga in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 as compared to 2018

2018 2019

~ s", Percent change in ~ ..sE'"s ~ ~ ~ E Perc~o( cbange in BOD .. ",g :=g DO values in year S.No. Sampling Point values in year 2019 as ! 0- .s 0_ 2019 as compared ! ! Q u- compared to )'ur 2018 d _Z to year2019 ~ ~ ~~ Q d ~~ .... - .,; .... - VIs Ramganga near 1 7.60 3.10 53667 7.30 1.80 16167 -41.94 -3.95 Agwanpur, Distt. Moradabad

Moradabad Rampur road 2 5.30 6.00 575167 4.70 11.10 558333 85.00 -11.32 bridge, Moradabad

Dis Ramganga, Shahabad 3 5.70 5.30 168667 5.10 7.60 430833 43.40 -10.53 Ramp",

Uls Rarnganga Kapurpur 4 6.50 1.50 33750 7.90 3.20 19083 11333 21.54 village. Meerganj, bareilly

DIs Ramganga FBD road 5 7.60 2.00 26750 10.10 300 14500 50.00 32.89 bridge Shahjahapur

6 Ramganga at Kannauj 8.20 4.60 5092 9.00 4.60 14775 0.00 9.76

Note: I-DO increased at 04 sampling Location. 2- BOD decreased at 01 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Betwa in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 (Jan to Nov) as compared to 2018

Percent Percent 2018 2019 (Jan-Nov) Change in Change in BOD DO values values in Regional Sampling =- ~=- =- ~=- in year SNo District ~ .. oS e =- .. oS e year 2019 Office Location .§, "g .. .§, "g 2019 as .§, 0- .§, 0- as ~ U ~ U compared c:! z 0 z compared l:> ~ ~ c:! ~; to year ~~ .. to year 2019 2018

Betwa at I Banda Hamirpur Hamirpur. 6.69 5.24 10767 6.70 5.54 14636 5.62 0.12 Banda

Note: I-DO increased at 0I sampling Location. Z-No improvement in BOD. Percent change in water quality of River Ghaghra in term ofBiochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in tbe year 2019 (Jan to Nov) as compared to 2018

2018 2019 (Jan-Nov) Percent Change in Percent Change in Sampling Ea E:=- BOD values DO values in year SNo ~ ~ - E ~ ~ - E Location .§, ~g .£e iu year 2019 2019 as compared E <0_ ! <0_ ~ ! == Wi!: ~ Wz as compared to year 2019 0 =! - 0 -;; to year 2018 i::l 0 ~6.. i::l 0 ';;::;::.. 0:1 f-< =l f-<~

1 U/S Badhalgaoj 7.18 5.13 11450 7.11 5.07 19664 -1.02 -1.03

Turtipur DIS 2 7.20 4.98 11267 7.16 5.17 20000 3.97 -0.51 Deoria

Note: I-No Improvement III DO. Z- BOD decreased at 0I sampling location Percent change in water quality of River Rapti in term of Biochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 (Jan to Nov) as compared to 2018

2018 2019 (Jan-Nov) Percent Percent Change Change in in DO values in Sampling e=- E=- BODvalues SNo ~ ~ oS E ~ ~ ~ E year 2019 as Location E in year 2019 ~ ,5, compared to 6 "'~Q ~ "'~Q~ ~ ,5, as compared ~ U;z; ~ U;z; year 2019 0 0 to year 2018 ~ 0 ]~ ~ ~~ 0:1 ~ ~ ;-.

Rapti river 1 Domingarh, 6.84 4.91 17608 6.99 4.98 248[8 1.53 2.23 Gorakhpur

Rapti river DIs 2 7.06 5.32 13508 6.85 5.69 34118 7.04 -3.02 Gorakhpur

Note: I-DO increased at 01 samplIng LocatIOn. 2-No improvement in BOD. Percent change in water quality of River Sal in term ofBiochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 (Jan to Nov) as compared to 2018

2018 2019 (Jan- Nov) Percent ""e 'E=> Percent g => Change in ~ ~ Change in ~ DO values Q- ~ BODvalnes ~ Cl> ~ ~ ~ ~ in year S.No. Name ofLocation 8 ~ 8 in year 2019 ~ 8 ~ ~8 ~ 2019 as e Q A ~ E as 0 0 0 0 compared A ~ A ~ compared to = ~ ~ to year U = u year 2018 ;; 2019 ~ '3 ~ ...C>

Sai river,Bani, 1 6.86 3.84 4613 7.22 3.14 5289 -18.06 5.24 Urman

Sai river, Sirsaghat, 2 7.07 4.30 7525 7.18 4.24 6955 -1.48 1.54 Raibareli

Sai river, 3 6.26 4.89 8417 6.09 4.95 8064 I.J0 -2.68 Rajghat,Raibareli

Sal river, 4 Picnic spot 5.98 5.13 8575 6.05 5.12 8373 -0.30 1.33 Raibareli, Sai river,Gaighat 5 Raibareli, 6.66 4.76 8075 6.77 4.63 7773 -2.75 1.72 Pratapgarh Sai river,Belamai 6 6.88 4.59 7850 6.87 4.56 7682 -0.61 -0.03 Ghat, Pratapgarh Sai Nadi,at Dis 7 Stream 6.05 5.16 8575 5.86 5.17 8673 0.28 -3.08 Pratapgarh,near Sai Nadi,Jalalpur, 8 7.91 3.71 15933 7.62 3.48 13000 -6.11 -3.67 Jaunpur Note: I-DO Increased at 04 samphng LocatIOn. 2- BOD decreased at 05 sampling location Percent change in water quality of River saryu in term ofBiochemical Oxygen Demand & Dissolved Oxygen in the year 2019 (Jan to Nov) as compared to 2018

2018 2019(Jan- Nov) Percent Percent Cbange in Cbange in BOD values DO values Regional Sampling E;:::;- a ea in year in year S No District ~ " e ~ ~ E Office Location oS= ",g 2019 as 2019 as ~ E- ==o- E- '"E- 0- 0 ci U z 0 ci U z compared compared 0 0 - ... .,; ...~~ Q .,; ...~6 to year to year '" 2018 2019

Saryu at J Ayodhya Ayodhya 9.63 2.95 7108 9.74 3.04 6255 2.93 1.16 Ayodhya

Note: I-DO Increased at 01 samplmg LocatIOn. 2-No improvement in BOD. Critically No. of No. ofMonitoring % Reduction in BOD value in Polluted River Monitoring Locations 2019 as compared to 2018 Stretch Locations showing Improvement of river water quality Hindon 07 05 2.3 to 35.7 Kali Nadi East 06 05 11.8 to 28.6 Varuna 02 02 4.0 to 37.1 Yamuna 20 08 0.2 to 9.1 Gomti 11 06 1.3 to 21.9 Ganga 22 21 0.2 to 36.4 Ramganga 06 01 38.7 Ghaghra 02 01 1.0 Sal 08 06 0.3 to 18.0

River Monitoring points within Monitoring Gap i.e. Monitoring the identified polluted points where points where BOD> stretches BOD < 3 me:/1 3mg/l Hindon 07 00 07 Kali Nadi East 06 00 06 Varuna 02 00 02 Yamuna 20 04 16 Gomti 11 02 09 Ganga 22 06 16 Ramganga 06 02 04 Betwan 01 00 01 Ghaghra 02 00 02 Rapti 02 00 02 Sai 08 00 08 Sarvu 01 01 00 Total 88 15 73 Annexure-V Bio-Medical Wastes

Current ~ Private Health Care Facilities (HCFs): 18642. Public HCFs- 5240. Total HCFs­ Status 23882 ~ Total Bio-Medical Waste (BMW) generated: 52.5 Tonnes/Day ~ BMW Treatment capacity in the State: 54.5 Tonnes/Day ~ Facilities for disposal of waste: • 18 Common Biomedical Waste Treatment Facilities (CBWTFs) ~ Bio Medical Waste authorization granted to HCFs: 20927 (87.6% oftotal HCFs)

S.No Total No. ofHealth Care Facilities Authoriz 1 19650 10,130 ( 2 19674 14,648 (A 3 23882 20,927 (No

~ Bio Medical Waste authorization granted to CBWTFs: 17 ~ Action against Defaulters • Prosecutions filed Under Section 15 of Environment (Protection) Act.(EPA)­ 1986 o against Health Care Facilities: OS o against CBWTFs: 03 • Notice issued against defaulter HCFs: 2929 • Show Cause Notice issued under Environment (Protection) Act. 1986 against HCFs: 26 • Environmental Compensation ofRs. 7.17 Crore imposed on 130 HCFs • Environmental Compensation of Rs. 85 Lacs imposed on 06 CBWTFs ~ State Advisory Committee (SAC) has been constituted on 16.03.2017 ~ State Advisory Committee meeting held on 18th April 2019, 28th May 2019 & 19th December 2019 regarding monitoring of Implementation of BMW Rules, 2016, installation of Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) and also coordination with other departments/agencies. ~ Nodal Officers have been designated in each District as well as in Health Facilities to ensure proper implementation of the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules. 2016. ~ As per provision, Bio-Medical Waste Committees have been constituted in each District level Health Care Facility. ~ In addition, District Monitoring Committee/District Environment Committee for Biomedical Waste management has been constituted in each District which is being chaired by the District Magistrate. » Annual Report under BMW Rules. 2016 sent by UP Pollution Control Board to Central Pollution Control Board. » Bio Medical Waste Information System- In compliance with the provisions of section 13 of the Biomedical Waste Rules, Annual reports have been generated from BMWMIS for all District hospitals and Community Healthcare Centres (CHCs) and have been duly submitted to the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB). Real time data of Biomedical waste lifting is being uploaded on the BMWMIS Portal. » Training- Regular Training is being conducted on Biomedical Waste management in all District level hospitals. Sensitization training has been conducted in 15 divisions Out of18 Divisions. » Inspection of Public and Private HCFs: Department of Medical Health & Family Welfare Uttar Pradesh has developed a Inspection checklist according to Bio-medical waste management rules which shall be implemented in monitoring of Healthcare Facilities other than hospitals/clinics such as Veterinary Hospitals, Animal Houses, AYUSH Hospitals etc. At present Department of Medical Health & Family Welfare has inspected of3262 HCFs out of which 607 Health Care Facilities has been served notice for non-compliance of BMW rules. » The compliance of BMW Rules is to be uploaded on dedicated Monitoring Portal ''http://www.upecp.in'' every month. By Order No- 13/2019/NGT­ 257/55-Parya-2-2019-44(Ritt)/2016 dated- 14th June 2019 the DMC was merged with District Environment Committee. Altogether a totai of 143 DMC/DEC meeting were conducted in across the State of Uttar Pradesh for the year 2019. In three Districts namely Maharajganj, Sonebhadra and Ayodhya where the DMC/DEC has been constituted but information about meetings are awaited. The Status Report of Medical Health & Family Welfare Department, GoUP and U.P. Pollution Control Board on Bio-Medical Waste Management are enclosed at Annexure·Z & Annexure·3 respectively. Desirable Proper segregation and disposal ofBMW generated in Uttar Pradesh- level of i. All the Government & private HCFs in 75 districts of Uttar Pradesh are to be complianc under contract with 18 Common Biomedical Waste Treatment Facilities e in terms (CBWTFs) for proper disposal of Bio-medical waste. ofstatutes ii. The registration & renewal of registration of private HCFs is to be done only after Authorization from UPPCB. iii. The collection shed must be constructed in all HCFs. iv. Use of Colour coded non-chlorinated bags, gloves- Medical Health & Family Welfare Department, GoUP has ensured that all the Government health care facilities are in Contract with CBWTF and it is the responsibility of the service provider to provide all the Consumables required for proper segregation ofBiomedical Waste. v. Bar-code System for bags or containers containing BMW-Bar coding System has been taken-up as pilot project in Lucknow District which shall be scaled up for the entire state by June 2020. vi. As per BMW rule, 2016 installation of ETP is mandatory for above 10 bedded hospitals. Hence the ETP has to be installed in District hospitals as well as CHC level Hospitals in the entire state ofUttar Pradesh. Gap ~ Collection Sheds in all bedded HCFs between ~ ETPs in all HCFs above 10 beds current ~ Authorization of 2955 HCFs status and ~ Inventorization ofall HCFs including Veterinary Hospitals & institution, AYUSH desired and Medical Institution. levels ~ Functioning of CBWTFs as per the provisions of BMW Rules, 2016 and CBWTF Guidelines. Proposal ~ Status & proposal of Construction of Collection Shed at District Level of Hospitals and CHCs for proper Collection ofSegregated Biomedical Waste- attending Budget has been provided to all District level hospitals and CHe's for the the gap construction of collection shed. Out of 1027 (DH's+CHe's) facilities, in 481 with time facilities work has been completed and in 546 facilities construction is under lines. progress and work will be completed by March 2020.

No. of No. ofFacilities No. ofFacilities with Timeline for Facilities with functional Collection Shed under Completion of rDH + CHCsl Collection Shed construction Collection Shed 1027 481 546 March 2020

~ Status and proposal of Construction of Deep Burial Pits at Primary Health Centres (PHCs): Budget Has been sanction to all Districts for construction of deep burial pits in all PHCs, which is under process. Guidelines have been issued for construction of pits to all Districts and work shall be completed by July 2020.

No.of No. ofFacilities No. of Facilities with Timeline for Facilities with fltnctional Deep burial pit under Completion of Deep (PHCs) Deep burial pit construction Burial pitS 3620 186 3434 July 2020 ETP: Installation of ETP in the entire state has been planned out in phase manner, looking at the budgetary constraints. NHM has already sanctioned an amount ofRs 6.14 crores for 41 district level hospitals in phase-l and work order has been given to UP laJ Nigam for installation of ETPs in the same. For phase-II and Phase-III. estimation of remaining 123 District level Hospitals and 853 Community Health care centres has been done by civil wing of the Directorate and send to NHM to be incorcorated in the PIP for .ettin bud.et from the Centre. S. Phase No. of Timeline for Completion No. Health II Care Facility 1 Phase-! 41 In 1 District Hospital i.e. SSPG Hospital Varanasi (District has completed the ETP installation. Work order Hospitals) has been issued to UP Jal Nigam for construction of ETP in 40 Districts level hospitals and work shall be completed by June 2020. Phase-II An estimated budget ofapprox. 1475 Lakhs has 2 123 District been proposed in the PIP of NHM. Work Shall be Hospitals completed by December 2020. Phase-III An estimated budget ofapprox. 80 crores has been 3 853 Communit proposed in the PIP of NHM. Work Shall be y Health completed by December 2021. Centres *Remaining- 13 District level hospitals has been upgraded to Medical colleges for which Department of Medical Education is will be finalizing the Installation of ETP by December 2020. » Bar coding System has been taken-up as pilot project in Lucknow District which shall be scaled up for the entire state by June 2020. Annexure-VI Ground water regulation

Current Status • State Government notified THE UTTAR PRADESH GROUND WATER (MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION) ACT, 2019 (U.P. Act No-13 Of 2019) Dated- 07, August 2019 for protecting, conserving, controlling and regulating ground water to ensure its sustainable management in the state, both quantitatively and qualitatively, especially in stressed rural and urban areas. • Government of has also launched ')al Shakti Abhiyan" aiming at comprehensive, water management in 'Over-exploited' and 'Critical' blocks/ cities. • As per Ground Water Resource Estimation, 2017, out of 820 blocks of Uttar Pradesh: ~ 82 blocks have been categorized as 'Over-Exploited' (where ground water extraction is >100%). ~ 47 as 'Critical' (where ground water extraction is >90 & <100%), ~ 151 as 'Semi- Critical'(where ground water extraction is >70 & <90%), and ~ 540 as 'Safe' (where ground water extraction is <70%). ~ Out of 10 Urban Agglomerates, 9 have been categorised as 'Over­ exploited' and1as 'Critical'. • Ground Water Quality monitored. 358 ground water samples, each for pre and post monsoon seasons, collected and analyzed through IlTR (Indian Institute ofToxicology Research) for analysis. • During last 5 years, 104 arsenic-free wells have been constructed in arsenic affected areas of U.P. • Minor Irrigation Department ~ Check Dam Constructed- 5588 ~ Pond Constructed - 609 • The Status Report of State Ground Water Board is enclosed as Annexure­ Z!!. Desirable level • All the'Over-exploited'and'Critical'blocks/cities (129 blocks and 10 ofcompliance cities), whichare facing Ground Water scarcity requires remediation in terms of W.r.t. Ground Water Recharge/Conservation and Demand Side statutes Management to augment and prevent the misuse of ground water. • Demarcate the Polluted areas for safe Ground Water. Gap between • Massive awareness programme is required in State to make people currentstatus aware about importance of precious resources and to prevent misuse of and desired Ground Water. levels. • Micro Irrigation Systems should be introduced in place offlood irrigation to save Ground Water and increase the productivity. • The crop pattern / type should also change in problematic areas. • The whole State should be demarcated w.r.t Poor Ground Water Quality Zone. •A Regulation is required for protecting. conserving and regulating Ground Water. Proposalof • The "Rajya Bhoojal Sanrakshan Mission" started from yr 2017-18 to attendingthe converge the works of different departments in problematic areas so as gapwithtime to get significant effect on Ground water. lines. • In this Mission, all Over Exploited, Critical, Semi-Critical blocks and rest blocks of and Vindhyan regions are covered. • Under Mission, progress of some major works are given below (up to September 2019) Name ofStructure Target Progress Check Dam 3542 2028 Pond Rejuvination/Consrtuction 36093 19372

Farm Pond 16690 8171 Distribution ofDrip/Sprinkler 73261 18993 System • Besides above Plantation of Tree, Bandhikaran, Roof Top Rain Water Harvesting etc. are also done in this mission. These works are carried out by different working departments viz. Minor Irrigation, jal Nigam, Agriculture, Horticulture, Rural Development, Irrigation, Forest etc. by their own budget. More funds would be required to reach the target. • In next year department aimed to conduct ground water quality assessment by IITR (Indian Institute of Toxicology Research) for Basin. • In current Year Check Dam to be Constructed 478

Pond to be Constructed 398 Annexure- VII

Protection and management ofFlood Plain Zones (FPZ)

Name of River Stretch Introduce pillars at suitable location in the river flood River plain for demarcation of the flood plain boundary for effective enforcement on eliminating incidence/practices ofwaste disposal encroachment in the river bed. Activity Timeline Hindon Saharanpur to 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Ghaziabad construction/no develooment zones. Details survey is being conducted by liT Delhi 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Kali East Muzaffarnagar 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months to Gulaothi construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Deoartment. Varuna Remeshwar to 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Varanasi construction/no develooment zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Yamuna Azgarpurto 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 6 Months Etawah, construction/no development zones till the Shahpurto notification of the above purpose is issued by Prayagrai Central Water Commission based on their studies. Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Gomti Sitapur to 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Varanasi construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable olants through Forest Deoartment. Ganga Kannauj to Detailed report of flood plain zone has been 3 Months Varanasi presented by Special Committee in G.A. 200/2014 to Hon'ble NGT. Demarcation of flood plain zone will be made at 9 Months suitable location as per Central Water Commission (CWCl report, will be made bv fixing pillars at suitable interval. Ganga Kannauj to 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 6 Months Varanasi construction/no development zones till the detailed report of Flood Plain Zone will be prepared by ewe in accordance with the orders issued in O.A. no. 200/2014 b y Hon'ble NGT regarding segment 'B' - II Phase. Demarcation of flood plain zone will be made at 9 Months suitable location as per ewe report, will be made by fixing pillars at suitable interval. Ramganga Moradabad to 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Kannauj construction/no development zones. For detailed survev 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department Betwan Hamirpurto 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Wagpura construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable interval as per topographical condition bv stone pillars/plantation Ghaghra Barhalganj to 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Deoria construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain zone at suitable 9 Months location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Rapti Domingarh to 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Rajghat construction/no development zones. For detailed survev 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain zone at suitable 9 Months location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Sai Unnao to 50 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months jaunpur construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain zone at suitable 9 Months location by planting a row of suitable plants through Forest Department. Saryu Ayodhya to 100 m from both banks will be declared as no 3 Months Elafatganj construction/no development zones. For detailed survey 6 Months Demarcation of flood plain will be made at 9 Months suitable interval as per topographical condition bv stone oillars/olantation Annexure-VIII Maintenance ofE-flow for the critically polluted river stretches

o Perennial River Flow:

Name of River Stretch Possibility of maintaining E- Timeline River flow Hindon Saharanpur to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Ghaziabad by lIT Delhi. Months Yamuna Azgarpur to E-flow will be studied and 12 Etawah, Shahpur decided by Central Water Months to Pravagrai Commission. Ganga Kannauj to E-flow from Kannauj to Unnao is - Varanasi maintained from Narora Barrage and Kanpur Barrage as per directions of Central Water Commission 24 cumec . Nov. to May 48 cumec - June to Oct. E-flow from Unnao to Varanasi 12 will be studied & decided by Months Central Water Commission. Ramganga Moradabad to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Kannaui by lIT Delhi or other agency. Months Betwa Hamirpur to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Wagpura by lIT Delhi or other agency. Months Ghaghra Barhalganj to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Deoria by lIT Delhi or other agency. Months Rapti Domingarh to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Rajghat by lIT Delhi or other agency. Months Saryu Ayodhya to E-flow study will be carried out 12 Elafatganj by lIT Delhi or other agency. Months

o Non-perennial River Flow:

Name ofRiver River Stretch Possibility ofmaintaininll E-fJow Kali Nadi East Muzaffarnagar to Gulaothi Varuna Remeshwar to Varanasi As it's a non perennial riYer, e-flow cannot Gomti Sitapur to be maintained. Varanasi Sai Unnao to Jaunour Annexure- IX

Plantation on both side ofRiver

Critically Polluted River Stretch No. ofsapling planted Year 2014-15 to 2018-19 Year 2019-20 Hindon 103640 59700 Kali 13200 11000 Gomti 643654 70825 Sai - 62500 Varuna 131307 39600 Ganga 138117 182550 Ramganga 124400 58100 Betwa 1317894 195625 Sarvu - 85500 Total 2472212 765400