History of Anatomy © the Mcgraw−Hill Anatomy, Sixth Edition Companies, 2001 History of Anatomy 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Anatomy © the Mcgraw−Hill Anatomy, Sixth Edition Companies, 2001 History of Anatomy 1 Van De Graaff: Human I. Historical Perspective 1. History of Anatomy © The McGraw−Hill Anatomy, Sixth Edition Companies, 2001 History of Anatomy 1 Definition of the Science 2 Prescientific Period 2 Scientific Period 4 Clinical Case Study Answer 20 Chapter Summary 20 Review Activities 21 Clinical Case Study A 55-year-old women visits the village apothecary for her increasing shortness of breath. The physician, learning of the woman’s symptoms and finding swelling in her legs, makes the diagno- sis of dropsy and prescribes a course of therapy meant to rid the body of evil humors. He applies a dozen of his healthiest leeches to the woman’s legs and drains a pint of her blood by opening a vein in her arm. Within hours, the patient is feeling much better and breathing easily. The ex- perience reinforces to the doctor the concept of evil humors and the effectiveness of bloodletting as a therapy. Dropsy (L. hydrops; from Gk. hydor, water) is an antiquated term commonly referring to any condition of edema (accumulation of tissue fluid), and was typically a result of congestive heart failure. Current therapy for this condition is oral fluid restriction and medications that in- duce diuresis (increased urination) with the ultimate goal of decreasing fluid volume. It is no wonder that losing a pint of blood made this woman feel better in the short term. Unfortu- nately, repeated courses of this crude therapy left patients profoundly anemic (low red blood cell count) and actually worsened their heart failure. Throughout medical history, how has an accurate understanding of human anatomy and physiology led to better disease therapy? FIGURE: Blood letting was a technique of medical practice widely used for over two thousand years. Van De Graaff: Human I. Historical Perspective 1. History of Anatomy © The McGraw−Hill Anatomy, Sixth Edition Companies, 2001 2 Unit 1 Historical Perspective CHAPTER 1 the structure of the body often has been stimulated by the desire DEFINITION OF THE SCIENCE of the medical profession to explain a body dysfunction. Various The science of human anatomy is concerned with the structural religions, on the other hand, have at one time or another stifled organization of the human body. The descriptive anatomical termi- the study of human anatomy through their restrictions on human nology is principally of Greek and Latin derivation. dissections and their emphasis on nonscientific explanations for diseases and debilitations. Objective 1 Define anatomy. Over the centuries, peoples’ innate interest in their own bodies and physical capabilities has found various forms of ex- Objective 2 Distinguish between anatomy, physiology, and pression. The Greeks esteemed athletic competition and ex- biology. pressed the beauty of the body in their sculptures. Many of the Objective 3 Explain why most anatomical terms are derived great masters of the Renaissance portrayed human figures in their from Greek and Latin words. art. Indeed, several of these artists were excellent anatomists be- cause their preoccupation with detail demanded it. Such an artis- Human anatomy is the science concerned with the structure of tic genius was Michelangelo, who captured the splendor of the the human body. The term anatomy is derived from a Greek human form in sculpture with the David (fig. 1.1) and in paint- word meaning “to cut up”; indeed, in ancient times, the word ings like those in the Sistine Chapel. anatomize was more commonly used than the word dissect. The Shakespeare’s reverence for the structure of the human science of physiology is concerned with the function of the body found expression in his writings: “What a piece of work is a body. It is inseparable from anatomy in that structure tends to re- man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! In form and flect function. The term physiology is derived from another Greek moving, how express and admirable! In action how like an word—this one meaning “the study of nature.” The “nature” of angel! In apprehension how like a god! The beauty of the world! an organism is its function. Anatomy and physiology are both The paragon of animals!” (Hamlet 2.2.315–319). subdivisions of the science of biology, the study of living organ- In the past, human anatomy was an academic, purely de- isms. The anatomy of every structure of the body is adapted for scriptive science, concerned primarily with identifying and nam- performing a function, or perhaps several functions. ing body structures. Although dissection and description form The dissection of human cadavers (ka˘-dav’erz) has served the basis of anatomy, the importance of human anatomy today is as the basis for understanding the structure and function of the in its functional approach and clinical applications. Human human body for many centuries. Every beginning anatomy stu- anatomy is a practical, applied science that provides the founda- dent can discover and learn firsthand as the structures of the tion for understanding physical performance and body health. body are systematically dissected and examined. The anatomical Studying the history of anatomy helps us appreciate the relevant terms that a student learns while becoming acquainted with a science that it is today. structure represent the work of hundreds of dedicated anatomists of the past, who have dissected, diagrammed, described, and Knowledge Check named the multitude of body parts. Most of the terms that form the language of anatomy are of 1. What is the derivation and meaning of anatomy? Greek or Latin derivation. Latin was the language of the Roman 2. Explain the statement, Anatomy is a science based on ob- Empire, during which time an interest in scientific description servation, whereas physiology is based on experimentation was cultivated. With the decline of the Roman Empire, Latin be- and observation. came a “dead language,” but it retained its value in nomenclature 3. Why does understanding the biology of an organism de- because it remained unchanged throughout history. As a conse- pend on knowing its anatomy and physiology? quence, if one is familiar with the basic prefixes and suffixes (see 4. Discuss the value of using established Greekor Latin pre- the inside front cover of this text), many of the terms in the de- fixes and suffixes in naming newly described body structures. scriptive science of anatomy can be understood. Although the Greeks and Romans made significant contributions to anatomical terminology, it should be noted that many individuals from other cultures have also contributed to the science of human anatomy. As a scientific field of inquiry, human anatomy has had a PRESCIENTIFIC PERIOD rich, long, and frequently troubled heritage. The history of Evidence indicates that a knowledge of anatomy was of survival human anatomy parallels that of medicine. In fact, interest in value in prehistoric times and that it provided the foundation for medicine. anatomy: Gk. ana, up; tome, a cutting Objective 4 Explain why an understanding of human physiology: Gk. physis, nature; logos, study anatomy is essential in the science of medicine. biology: Gk. bios, life; logos, study cadaver: L. cadere, to fall Objective 5 Define trepanation and paleopathology. Van De Graaff: Human I. Historical Perspective 1. History of Anatomy © The McGraw−Hill Anatomy, Sixth Edition Companies, 2001 CHAPTER 1 Chapter 1 History of Anatomy 3 FIGURE 1.2 Contemporary redrawings of large game mammals that were depicted on the walls of caves occupied by early Homo sapiens in western Europe. Presumably the location of the heart is drawn on the mammoth, and vulnerable anatomical sites are shown on the two bison. Prehistoric people needed a practical knowledge of anatomy simply for survival. From A Short History of Anatomy and Physiology from the Greeks to Harvey by C. Singer, 1957, Dover Publications, New York, NY. Reprinted by permission. clothing, or implements. Undoubtedly, they knew that the mus- cles functioned in locomotion and that they also provided a major source of food. The skin from mammals with its associated fur served as a protective covering for their own sparsely haired skin. Early humans knew that the skeletal system formed a durable framework within their bodies and those of other verte- brates. They used the bones from the animals on which they fed to fashion a variety of tools and weapons. They knew that their own bones could be broken through accidents, and that improper healing would result in permanent disability. They knew that if an animal was wounded, it would bleed, and that excessive loss of blood would cause death. Perhaps they also realized that a se- vere blow to the head could cause deep sleep and debilitate an animal without killing it. Obviously, they noted anatomical dif- ferences between the sexes, even though they could not have un- derstood basic reproductive functions. The knowledge these people had was of the basic, practical type—a knowledge neces- sary for survival. Certain surgical skills are also ancient. Trepanation (trep- FIGURE 1.1 Michelangelo completed the 17-foot-tall David in ′ 1504. Sculpted from a single block of white, flawless Carrara marble, a˘-na shun), the drilling of a hole in the skull, or removal of a por- this masterpiece captures the physical nature of the human body in tion of a cranial bone, seems to have been practiced by several an expression of art. groups of prehistoric people. Trepanation was probably used as a ritualistic procedure to release evil spirits, or on some patients, perhaps, to relieve cranial pressure resulting from a head wound. It is likely that a type of practical comparative anatomy is the oldest Trepanated skulls have been found repeatedly in archaeological science. Certainly, humans have always been aware of some of their sites (fig. 1.3). Judging from the partial reossification in some of anatomical structures and how they function.
Recommended publications
  • History of Anatomy in the Reflection of Collecting Media
    Journal of Human Anatomy MEDWIN PUBLISHERS ISSN: 2578-5079 Committed to Create Value for Researchers History of Anatomy in the Reflection of Collecting Media Bugaevsky KA* Research Article Department of Medical and Biological Foundations of Sports and Physical Rehabilitation, The Volume 5 Issue 1 Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, Ukraine Received Date: June 30, 2021 Published Date: July 28, 2021 *Corresponding author: Konstantin Anatolyevich Bugaevsky, Assistant Professor, The DOI: 10.23880/jhua-16000154 Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, Nikolaev, Ukraine, Tel: + (38 099) 60 98 926; Email: [email protected] Abstract contribution to the anatomical study of the human body, by famous scientists-anatomists, both antiquity and modernity, Such The article presents the materials of the study devoted to the reflection in the means of collecting, information about the as Avicenna, Ibn al-Nafiz, Andrei Vesalius, William Garvey, Ambroise Paré, Giovanni Baptista Morgagni, Miguel Servet, Gabriel Fallopius, Bartolomeo Eustachio, Leonardo da Vinci, Jan Yesenius, John Hunter, Ales Hrdlichka of the past and a number of to the development and formation of anatomy as a basic medical science, but were also the founders of a number of related others, in the reflection of various means of philately and numismatics. All these scientists made a significant contribution medical disciplines, such as pathological anatomy, operative surgery and topographic anatomy, forensic medical examination. The tools, techniques and techniques developed by them for the autopsy of corpses and the preparation of various parts of the body of deceased people, all the practical experience they have gained, are still actively used in modern anatomy and medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.2% 116,000 120M Top 1% 154 3,900
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,900 116,000 120M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com Chapter Introductory Chapter: Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology Valentina Kubale, Emma Cousins, Clara Bailey, Samir A.A. El-Gendy and Catrin Sian Rutland 1. History of veterinary anatomy and physiology The anatomy of animals has long fascinated people, with mural paintings depicting the superficial anatomy of animals dating back to the Palaeolithic era [1]. However, evidence suggests that the earliest appearance of scientific anatomical study may have been in ancient Babylonia, although the tablets upon which this was recorded have perished and the remains indicate that Babylonian knowledge was in fact relatively limited [2]. As such, with early exploration of anatomy documented in the writing of various papyri, ancient Egyptian civilisation is believed to be the origin of the anatomist [3]. With content dating back to 3000 BCE, the Edwin Smith papyrus demonstrates a recognition of cerebrospinal fluid, meninges and surface anatomy of the brain, whilst the Ebers papyrus describes systemic function of the body including the heart and vas- culature, gynaecology and tumours [4]. The Ebers papyrus dates back to around 1500 bCe; however, it is also thought to be based upon earlier texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teaching of Anatomy Throughout the Centuries: from Herophilus To
    Medicina Historica 2019; Vol. 3, N. 2: 69-77 © Mattioli 1885 Original article: history of medicine The teaching of anatomy throughout the centuries: from Herophilus to plastination and beyond Veronica Papa1, 2, Elena Varotto2, 3, Mauro Vaccarezza4, Roberta Ballestriero5, 6, Domenico Tafuri1, Francesco M. Galassi2, 7 1 Department of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Napoli, Italy; 2 FAPAB Research Center, Avola (SR), Italy; 3 Department of Humanities (DISUM), University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 4 School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, WA, Australia; 5 University of the Arts, Central Saint Martins, London, UK; 6 The Gordon Museum of Pathology, Kings College London, London, UK;7 Archaeology, College of Hu- manities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia Abstract. Cultural changes, scientific progress, and new trends in medical education have modified the role of dissection in the teaching of anatomy in today’s medical schools. Dissection is indispensable for a correct and complete knowledge of human anatomy, which can ensure safe as well as efficient clinical practice and the hu- man dissection lab could possibly be the ideal place to cultivate humanistic qualities among future physicians. In this manuscript, we discuss the role of dissection itself, the value of which has been under debate for the last 30 years; furthermore, we attempt to focus on the way in which anatomy knowledge was delivered throughout the centuries, from the ancient times, through the Middles Ages to the present. Finally, we document the rise of plastination as a new trend in anatomy education both in medical and non-medical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Anatomy at Cornell
    A History of Anatomy at Cornell Howard E. Evans Prof. of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Emeritus College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell University Ithaca, N.Y. Published by The Internet-First University Press ©2013 Cornell University Commentary on the History of Anatomy at Cornell1 Historical Notes as Regards the Department of Anatomy H. E. Evans The Early Days To set the stage for this review, Cornell University opened on Oct. 7, 1868 in South University building, the only building on campus (later re-named Morrill Hall). North University building (White Hall) was under construc- tion but McGraw Hall in between, which would house anatomy, zoology and the museum, had not begun. Louis Agassiz of Harvard, who was appointed non-resident Prof. of Natural History at Cornell, gave an enthusias- tic inaugural address and set the tone for future courses in natural science. Included on the first faculty were Burt G. Wilder, M.D. from Harvard as Prof. of Comparative Anatomy and Natural History, recommended to President A.D. White by Agassiz, and James Law, FRCVS as Prof. of Veterinary Surgery, who was recommended by John Gamgee of the New Edinburgh Veterinary College and hired after an interview in London by Pres. White. Both Wilder and Law were accomplished anatomists in addition to their other abilities and both helped shape Cornell for many years. I found in the records many instances of their interactions on campus, which is not surprising when one considers how few buildings there were. The Anatomy Department in the College of Veterinary Medicine has a legacy of anatomical teaching at Cornell that began before our College became a separate entity in 1896.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Anatomy
    science from its beginning and in all its branches so related as to weave the story into a continu- ous narrative has been sadly lacking. Singer states that in order to lessen the bulk of his work he has omitted references and bibliog- raphies from its pages, but we may readily recognize in reading it that he has gone to original sources for its contents and that all the statements it contains are authoritative and can readily be verified. In the Preface Singer indicates that we may hope to see the work continued to a later date than Harvey’s time and also that the present work may yet be expanded so as to contain material necessarily excluded from a book of the size into which this is compressed, because from cover to cover this volume is all meat and splendidly served for our delectation and digestion. Singer divides the history of Anatomy into four great epochs or stages. The first is from the Greek period to 50 b .c ., comprising the Hippocratic period, Aristotle and the Alexan- drians. Although, as Singer says, “our anatom- ical tradition, like that of every other depart- ment of rational investigation, goes back to the Greeks,” yet before their time men groped at some ideas as to anatomical structure, as evinced by the drawings found in the homes of the cave dwellers, and the Egyptians and the The Evo lut ion of Ana to my , a Short Histo ry of Anat omi cal an d Phys iolo gica l Disc ove ry , Mesopotamians had quite distinct conceptions to Harve y .
    [Show full text]
  • A Course in the History of Biology: II
    A Course in the History of Biology: II By RICHARDP. AULIE Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/32/5/271/26915/4443048.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 * Second part of a two-part article. An explanation of the provements in medical curricula, and the advent of author's history of biology course for high school teachers, human dissections; (ii) the European tradition in together with abstracts of two of the course topics-"The Greek View of Biology" and "What Biology Owes the Arabs" anatomy, which was influenced by Greek and Arab -was presented in last month's issue. sources and produced an indigenous anatomic liter- ature before Vesalius; and (iii) Vesalius' critical The Renaissance Revolution in Anatomy examination of Galen, with his introduction of peda- urely a landmark in gogic innovations in the Fabrica. This landmark thus shows the coalescing of these several trends, all - 1- q -thei history of biology is De Humani Corpo- expressed by the Renaissance artistic temperament, and all rendered possible by the new printing press, - 1 P risi tFabrica Libri Sep- engraving, and improvements in textual analysis. - - ~~~tern("Seven Books on the Workings of By contrast with Arab medicine, which flourished the Human Body"), in an extensive hospital system, Renaissance anatomy published in 1543 by was associated from the start with European univer- sities, which were peculiarly a product of the 12th- Vesalius of -- ~~~~~Andreas E U I Brussels (1514-1564). century West. As a preface to Vesalius, the lectures In our course in the on this topic gave attention to the founding of the universities of Bologna (1158), Oxford (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Dioscorides De Materia Medica Pdf
    Dioscorides de materia medica pdf Continue Herbal written in Greek Discorides in the first century This article is about the book Dioscorides. For body medical knowledge, see Materia Medica. De materia medica Cover of an early printed version of De materia medica. Lyon, 1554AuthorPediaus Dioscorides Strange plants RomeSubjectMedicinal, DrugsPublication date50-70 (50-70)Pages5 volumesTextDe materia medica in Wikisource De materia medica (Latin name for Greek work Περὶ ὕλης ἰατρικῆς, Peri hul's iatrik's, both means about medical material) is a pharmacopeia of medicinal plants and medicines that can be obtained from them. The five-volume work was written between 50 and 70 CE by Pedanius Dioscorides, a Greek physician in the Roman army. It was widely read for more than 1,500 years until it supplanted the revised herbs during the Renaissance, making it one of the longest of all natural history books. The paper describes many drugs that are known to be effective, including aconite, aloe, coloxinth, colocum, genban, opium and squirt. In all, about 600 plants are covered, along with some animals and minerals, and about 1000 medicines of them. De materia medica was distributed as illustrated manuscripts, copied by hand, in Greek, Latin and Arabic throughout the media period. From the sixteenth century, the text of the Dioscopide was translated into Italian, German, Spanish and French, and in 1655 into English. It formed the basis of herbs in these languages by such people as Leonhart Fuchs, Valery Cordus, Lobelius, Rembert Dodoens, Carolus Klusius, John Gerard and William Turner. Gradually these herbs included more and more direct observations, complementing and eventually displacing the classic text.
    [Show full text]
  • "You Can't Make a Monkey out of Us": Galen and Genetics Versus Darwin
    "You can't make a monkey out of us": Galen and genetics versus Darwin Diamandopoulos A. and Goudas P. Summary The views on the biological relationship between human and ape are polarized. O n e end is summarized by the axiom that "mon is the third chimpanzee", a thesis put forward in an indirect way initially by Charles Darwin in the 19 th century.The other is a very modern concept that although similar, the human and ape genomes are distinctly different. We have compared these t w o views on the subject w i t h the stance of the ancient medical w r i t e r Galen.There is a striking resemblance between current and ancient opinion on three key issues. Firstly, on the fact that man and apes are similar but not identical. Secondly, on the influence of such debates on fields much wider than biology.And finally, on the comparative usefulness of apes as a substitute for human anatomy and physiology studies. Resume Les points de vue concernant les liens biologiques existants entre etre humain et singe sont polarises selon une seule direction. A I'extreme, on pourrait resumer ce point de vue par I'axiome selon lequel « I'homme est le troisieme chimpanze ». Cette these fut indirectement soutenue par Charles Darwin, au I9eme siecle. L'autre point de vue est un concept tres moderne soutenant la similitude mais non I'identite entre les genomes de I'homme et du singe. Nous avons compare ces deux points de vue sur le sujet en mentionnant celui du medecin ecrivain Galien, dans I'Antiquite.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals on the Move
    BOOKS & ARTS NATURE|Vol 446|15 March 2007 like it. The same can be said for biomolecular studies the many ways in which organisms orders are unknown, so it would be impossible systems: we may never be able to comprehend can actively restructure their genetic material, to restrict the contents of chapters to strictly every molecular interaction within a cell, but if believes that such processes should be more monophyletic units. Nowadays, taxonomists we can build a system that behaves just like its widely incorporated into evolutionary think- have to deal with two different taxonomies: a natural counterpart, then perhaps we should ing. Although Darwin could not possibly have traditional one, based on morphology, and a be satisfied with that. anticipated such processes, they follow the modern one, based on molecular analysis. Each Amos’s account of the different paths to general darwinian paradigm and do not, in my chapter begins with an introduction describing synthetic biology covers most of the recent opinion, necessitate a ‘third way’ somewhere our changing views on the relationships of the advances that have made the headlines. These between creationism and what Shapiro calls animals to be discussed. These introductions range from pieces of DNA called ‘biobricks’ ‘neo-darwinian orthodoxy’. show the perspective and knowledge that Rose and the ‘repressilator’ to a way of coaxing yeast But apart from this quibble, this is an enjoy- uses when examining the data. When avail- to produce the precursor for a malaria drug able book that could perhaps have profited able, he provides two alternative cladograms — a feat for which Jay Keasling, a biochemical from more illustrations to convey some of the showing the relationships among the studied engineer at the University of California, Berke- computational and experimental methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of Anatomia: Dissection and the Organization of Knowledge in British Literature, 1500-1800
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 The na atomy of anatomia: dissection and the organization of knowledge in british literature, 1500-1800 Matthew cottS Landers Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Landers, Matthew Scott, "The na atomy of anatomia: dissection and the organization of knowledge in british literature, 1500-1800" (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1390. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1390 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE ANATOMY OF ANATOMIA: DISSECTION AND THE ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN BRITISH LITERATURE, 1500-1800 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fi lfi llment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Matthew Scott Landers B.A., University of Dallas, 2002 May 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Because of the sheer scale of my project, it would have been impossible to fi nish this dissertation without the opportunity to do research at libraries with special collections in the history of science. I am extremely greatful, as a result, to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at the University of Oklahoma for awarding me a fellowship to the History of Science Collections at Bizzell Library; and to Marilyn Ogilvie and Kerry Magruder for their kind assistance while there.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex, Sin and the Soul: How Galen's Philosophical Speculation Became
    Conversations: A Graduate Student Journal of the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology Volume 1 | Number 1 Article 1 January 2013 Sex, Sin and the Soul: How Galen’s Philosophical Speculation Became Augustine’s Theological Assumptions Paul Anthony Abilene Christian University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/conversations Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Anthony, Paul (2013) "Sex, Sin and the Soul: How Galen’s Philosophical Speculation Became Augustine’s Theological Assumptions," Conversations: A Graduate Student Journal of the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology: Vol. 1 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/conversations/vol1/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conversations: A Graduate Student Journal of the Humanities, Social Sciences, and Theology by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ ACU. Conversations Vol. 1 No. 1 May 2013 Sex, Sin and the Soul: How Galen’s Philosophical Speculation Became Augustine’s Theological Assumptions Paul A. Anthony Abilene Christian University Graduate School of Theology, History and Theology Abstract Augustine of Hippo may never have heard of Galen of Pergamum. Three centuries separated the two, as did an almost impassable geographic and cultural divide that kept the works of Galen and other Greek writers virtually unknown in the Latin west for a millennium. Yet Galenic assumptions about human sexuality and the materiality of the soul underlie Augustine’s signature doctrine of original sin. Galen’s influence was so widely felt in the Greek-speaking east that Christians almost immediately worked his assumptions into their own theologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideas of Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch and Galen on the Elderly
    2017;65:325-328 REVIEW The ideas of Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch and Galen on the elderly A. Diamandopoulos EKPA, Louros Foundation, Greece For the sake of brevity, we will deal here with a very small fraction of the texts of ancient Greek writers on Old Age, in a period of roughly 600 years between the 5th century BC and the 2nd century AD. And geographically also, the area covered is but a negligent fraction of the globe. Aim. To comment on a very small fraction of the texts of ancient Greek writers on Old Age, in a period of roughly 600 years between the 5th century BC and the 2nd century AD. Materials and methods. We used extracts from the writings of Plato (The Republic), Aristotle (De Anima), Plutarch (Vitae Parallelae, Moralia) and Galen (De Marcore Liber). Results. Plato presents two sides of the stance of elderly, i.e. continuity (to continue to do what they were doing in their active years), and disengagement (describes the tendency after some age to go away from your previous straggles and to contemplate on the eternal values of spirituality). Aristotle explains why in old age death is painless, like the shutting out of a tiny feeble flame. Plutarch elaborates extensively on the need to accumulate physical and mental qualifications when we are young so that we can be able to consume them later, in our old age. He declares that “although old age has much to be shameful of, at least let us not to add the disgrace of wickedness”. Finally, the social role of each person shall not mutate with age.
    [Show full text]