<<

BOOKS & ARTS NATURE|Vol 446|15 March 2007 like it. The same can be said for biomolecular studies the many ways in which organisms orders are unknown, so it would be impossible systems: we may never be able to comprehend can actively restructure their genetic material, to restrict the contents of chapters to strictly every molecular interaction within a cell, but if believes that such processes should be more monophyletic units. Nowadays, taxonomists we can build a system that behaves just like its widely incorporated into evolutionary think- have to deal with two different taxonomies: a natural counterpart, then perhaps we should ing. Although Darwin could not possibly have traditional one, based on , and a be satisfied with that. anticipated such processes, they follow the modern one, based on molecular analysis. Each Amos’s account of the different paths to general darwinian paradigm and do not, in my chapter begins with an introduction describing synthetic covers most of the recent opinion, necessitate a ‘third way’ somewhere our changing views on the relationships of the advances that have made the headlines. These between creationism and what Shapiro calls to be discussed. These introductions range from pieces of DNA called ‘biobricks’ ‘neo-darwinian orthodoxy’. show the perspective and knowledge that Rose and the ‘repressilator’ to a way of coaxing yeast But apart from this quibble, this is an enjoy- uses when examining the data. When avail- to produce the precursor for a malaria drug able book that could perhaps have profited able, he provides two alternative cladograms — a feat for which Jay Keasling, a biochemical from more illustrations to convey some of the showing the relationships among the studied engineer at the University of California, Berke- computational and experimental methods. forms, one based on morphology, the other on ley, won Discover magazine’s first ‘scientist of I recommend it to anyone interested in com- molecular studies. His preference is decidedly the year’ award. putation writ large who is not afraid to cross morphological, as is evident from his attitude But I have to take Amos to task for present- disciplinary boundaries that once seemed to the clade Afrotheria. ing the work of James Shapiro, a microbiologist impassable. ■ The notion of Afrotheria arose around 1990, at the University of Chicago, as if his investiga- Christoph Adami is at the Keck Graduate based on DNA analyses demonstrating that six tions of the mechanisms of somehow Institute of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, living orders of African placental mammals contradict darwinian evolution. Shapiro, who California 91711, USA. form a monophyletic clade. Although Rose often mentions the Afrotheria, he states: “No morphological evidence supporting Afrothe- ria has been found.” However, the Cretaceous representatives of modern mammalian orders Mammals on the move are unknown, and the lack of an early fossil record for most groups may be responsible The Beginning of the Age of Mammals black-and-white photographs, there are eight for any morphological gaps between them. by Kenneth D. Rose full-page colour plates with photographs of the Among the groups assigned to Afrotheria, Johns Hopkins University Press: 2006. best-preserved fossils and reconstructions. Rose, on the basis of morphology, accepts the 428 pp. $150 Although the bulk of the book is devoted to monophyly of Hyracoidea, Elephantoidea and this mammalian explosion, Rose starts at the Sirenia. But, against the molecular evidence, Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska beginning of the mammals’ tale. Two intro- he assigns Tenrecidae and Chrysochloridae Just looking at The Beginning of the Age of ductory chapters are followed by four on the not to Afrosoricida but to Insectivora; Macro- Mammals by Kenneth Rose, with its Henri origin of mammals and their early evolution scelidea to the relatives of the Anagalida; and Rousseau-style jacket picture, catapults the in the Mesozoic. finally Tubulidentata (not described because reader right into enchanted Early Eocene The author no doubt faced a problem when of a lack of fossils) to the archaic Ungulata. life. The book is a scholarly treatment of an dividing the rest of the book into chapters. Each chapter contains a systematic table important period in the evolution of mam- Details about the roots of many groups are using linnaean taxa and a hierarchy of system- mals. Mammals originated some 225 million hazy, and the earliest representatives of most atic units following Malcolm McKenna and years ago, and for about 160 million years they were small nocturnal creatures living in the shadow of the dinosaurs. Most of them would have been size of a shrew or rat, with only a few being as big as a fox. When the dinosaurs died out at the end of the Cretaceous, 65 mil- lion years ago, mammals changed lifestyle and started to increase their size, with many enter- ing niches abandoned by the extinct giants. This was the age of mammals. Kenneth Rose’s book The Beginning of the Age of Mammals is devoted to this explosion FRANKFURT SENCKENBERG, FORSCHUNGINST. of mammals, particularly their evolution dur- ing the first half of the Cenozoic period. Rose highlights in particular the development of placental mammals in the Palaeocene and Eocene (between 65 million and 33 million years ago). One of the charms of this book is the abun- dance of figures, with many attractive recon- structions of Eocene mammals. Some of these have been made possible by the unusual pres- ervation of complete mammalian skeletons from the Middle Eocene in Messel, Germany. Rose had an opportunity to collaborate with German colleagues when describing some of these mammals. As well as line drawings and Fossil skeletons of Middle Eocene mammals such as Kopidodon have been found in Messel, Germany.

264 NATURE|Vol 446|15 March 2007 BOOKS & ARTS

Susan Bell’s book Classification of Mammals — is not mentioned in the book. In the final and extant mammals, and for both advanced (Columbia University Press, 1997). But the chapter, Rose provides a summary of the idea undergraduate and graduate students. It is a PhyloCode (www.ohio.edu/phylocode) — a set of a sudden explosion of mammals after the ‘must buy’ for palaeontological libraries. ■ of rules governing phylogenetic nomenclature Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska is at the Institute that in recent years has gained many propo- This beautiful and thorough book will be an of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, nents among zoologists and palaeontologists essential tool for all those who work on fossil Warsaw, Poland. Mysteries of female

Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human by Katharine Park Zone Books: 2006. 300 pp. $36.95 Rina Knoeff Although the history of dissection in general has received increasing attention, the impor- tance of anatomizing female bodies has hith- erto been neglected. Katharine Park’s Secrets of Women is a first attempt to fill the gap. She relates a fascinating history of women on the dissection table. Central to her book are the LIBRARY ART LONDON/BRIDGEMAN BRITISH LIBRARY, almost unbelievable stories of an abbess whose contained a cross, a crown of thorns, nails and a lance, items well known as sym- bols of the Passion of Christ; the investigation of the body of a lactating virgin prophetess; the search for the cause of death of patrician wives and mothers; and the dissected body of an exe- cuted female criminal. The accounts are bizarre yet captivating, as they portray the opening of the body not only as a medical procedure, but also as a cultural practice embedded in reli- gious and social life. Park also exposes the myths that in the wake of Pope Boniface VIII’s bull Detestande feritatis in 1299, the opening of bodies was surrounded by a cultural taboo, and also that anatomical practice was prima- rily a male practice studying male bodies. The dissection of female bodies had religious and familial significance in the fifteenth century. Park argues that from the mid-thirteenth to the mid-sixteenth century, Italians understood instance, believed that Christ’s presence in the interprets the frontispiece of ’ their bodies both in terms of religion and in heart would create new life in the same way as book on human anatomy De humani corporis relation to family and kinship, and that this the father’s seed in the mother’s . Accord- fabrica as secular, simply because there are no particular way of viewing the body shaped ing to Park, the themes of holiness, generation Catholic icons. Yet, particularly given Vesal- dissection practices. Male uncertainty regard- and female corporeality together contributed ius’ Protestant upbringing, it can, and perhaps ing fatherhood (were they really the fathers of importantly to the history of dissection. should, be viewed as a Protestant depiction their children?), the existence of female-only At times, however, Park’s interpretation (as other historians of medicine have done knowledge regarding sexuality and generation is merely suggestive and the historical proof before). (mainly related to inordinate sexual appetite, wafer-thin. For instance, her argument that Nevertheless, Park’s book will undoubtedly abortion practices, the exercise of sexual auton- holy women generate relics much as mothers prove to be an important contribution to the omy and the exertion of power over men), as generate children is well argued. But her sug- history of anatomy. For the first time it exten- well as the functioning of the reproductive sys- gestion that the dissection of holy women in sively discusses the history of anatomy from tem inside the female body, culminated in an order to extract relics can be viewed as a reli- the viewpoint of the corpse and, because of its excessive interest in what came to be known as gious variant of a caesarean section, in which a particular focus on women’s bodies, it will radi- ‘the secrets of women’. As a result, Park argues, baby was removed from a dead mother’s body cally change the way we think about the (male) the uterus (and hence the inside of the female so it could be baptized, seems far-fetched. history of the anatomized body. As such, the body) became a focal point of anatomical In a similar , Park’s understanding of book is a ‘must read’ for anyone working on the research in Italian patriarchal society. religion is sometimes rather naive. Her inter- history of pre-modern medicine. But because Related to the opening of mothers’ bod- pretation of Christianity as exclusively Roman of its lucid style and fascinating argument, it ies, dissection practices concentrated on holy Catholic is understandable given the Italian is also surprisingly accessible, and I recom- women. Not only did women manifest reli- context she describes, but it leaves no room for mend it to anyone interested in the history gious experiences in a particular corporeal a pluralist view of religion. For Park, depictions of anatomy. ■ way, but these experiences were also described that lack characteristically Roman Catholic Rina Knoeff is in the Faculty of Arts, University of in physiological terms of pregnancy. It was, for symbols don’t seem to count. For example, she Leiden, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.

265