DOCSLIB.ORG

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics' Report on the Culture of Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics' Report on the Culture of Research A workshop to discuss The Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on the culture of research in HEIs Tuesday 21 July 2015 Aston University, Birmingham The aim of this workshop is to facilitate a discussion among research leaders and research support staff from UK HEIs about how the suggestions for action made in the Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ report on the culture of research are being or should be taken forward by HEIs and the research community as a whole. Relevant suggestions for action are listed below. The full report can be downloaded at: www.nuffieldbioethics.org/research-culture The Council is delighted to be co-hosting this workshop with Universities UK, the Association of Research Managers and Administrators, and Aston University. This is the first of two workshops following the report. The second will take place later in the year and will be for a wider set of stakeholders, such as funding bodies, publishers and editors, learned societies and policy makers, as well as research institutions. The outcomes of this first workshop focusing specifically on the views of HEIs will feed into the second workshop. Twitter: #sciculture 1 Programme 10.00 Coffee and registration Chair of morning session Jamie Arrowsmith, Programme Manager, Universities UK 10.30 Welcome Gina Rippon Professor of Cognitive Neuroimaging, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University 10.35 Overview of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics project on the culture of scientific research Ottoline Leyser Chair of the Steering Group for the Nuffield Council on Bioethics project on The culture of scientific research; Professor of Plant Development at the University of Cambridge 11.00- Session 1: Assessment of researchers 12.30 Panellists • Ian Carter, Director of Research and Enterprise, Sussex University • Bob Burgoyne, Professor of Physiology and Acting Executive Pro Vice- Chancellor for Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool; member of the Academy of Medical Science’s ‘Team Science’ Working Group • Paul Walton, Professor of Chemistry, University of York; member of the Royal Society of Chemistry’s Inclusion and Diversity Committee • Ann Hartley, Associate Director, Human Resources, Aston University Questions for discussion • What can be done to ensure researchers are assessed broadly, without undue reliance on journal impact factors and funding income? • How can appraisal systems become more sensitive to the full range of researchers’ professional work? • What research outputs other than publications in peer reviewed journals might research assessment recognise? • How can high quality peer review service be recognised rewarded? 12.30 Lunch 2 Chair of afternoon session Zoe Stockdale, Deputy Chair, Association of Research Managers and Administrators; Graduate Studies Manager, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford 13.30- Session 2: Research integrity and ethics 15.00 Panellists • James Parry, Chief Executive, UK Research Integrity Office • Margaret Rees, Chair of the Association for Research Ethics and Secretary of the Committee of Publication Ethics; Reader Emeritus in Reproductive Medicine, University of Oxford • Elizabeth Adams, Researcher Development Manager, University of Glasgow • David Hill, Head of Research Governance, Newcastle University Questions for discussion • What practical steps can universities take to embed research integrity and ethics within the heart of academic research? • What can universities do to minimise pressures and incentives that may result in researchers compromising on research integrity and ethics? • What are the responsibilities of universities in addressing cases of research misconduct? • How universities ensure that ethical review processes are flexible, appropriate and interactive, and that ethics committee members have appropriate guidance, training and knowledge? 15.00 Coffee break 15.30- Session 3: Career development and support 17.00 Panellists • Alison Mitchell, Director of Development, Vitae • Julia Warner, Research and Enterprise Manager, University of East Anglia • Marina Parry, Postdoctoral Scientist, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute • Liz Elvidge, Head of Postdoc Development Centre, Imperial College London Questions for discussion • What steps could universities take to better support researchers at the early stages of their careers? • How can universities better promote and support researchers looking to move into alternative careers? • What are universities doing to adopt employment practices that support diversity and inclusion? • How are leaders in research being supported? 17.00- Summing up and close 17.15 3 Background In 2014, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics carried out a series of engagement activities that explored the culture of scientific research in the UK and its effect on ethical conduct in science and the quality, value and accessibility of research. The project included a survey of almost 1000 people and 15 discussion events at universities around the UK involving around 740 participants. Although the focus of the project was scientific research, the issues raised are likely to be relevant to many other areas of academic research. The project found that researchers are concerned that aspects of the culture of research in UK HEIs can encourage poor research practices and hinder the production of high quality research. For example, high levels of competition and perceptions about how researchers are assessed for jobs and funding are reportedly contributing to a loss of creativity, less collaboration and poor research practices, such as rushing to finish and publish research or employing less rigorous research methods. The report of the project concludes with suggestions for action for funding bodies, research institutions, publishers and editors, professional bodies and individual researchers. Those for research institutions and researchers are as follows: Suggestions for action for research institutions • Ensure that the track record of researchers is assessed broadly, without undue reliance on journal impact factors, in processes for making appointments, conducting staff appraisals and awarding promotions. • Cultivate an environment in which ethics is seen as a positive and integral part of performing research. Ensure researchers, particularly early career researchers, have a thorough grounding in research ethics and access to information and training throughout their careers. Be open about the consequences of research misconduct. • Recognise and reward high quality peer review and committee service. • Provide mentoring and career advice to researchers throughout their careers. Encourage them to plan their future and expand their skills and experience outside of the research environment, and tackle negative attitudes towards those leaving academia. • Ensure institutional ethical review processes are flexible, appropriate and interactive, and that ethics committee members have appropriate guidance, training and knowledge. • Support leaders in research by providing appropriate training, resources and recognition for their diverse activities. • Sign up to the principles of the Athena SWAN Charter and adopt other employment practices that support diversity and inclusion. Suggestions for action for researchers • Be familiar with and actively contribute to the adoption of relevant codes of ethical conduct and standards for high quality research, treat colleagues fairly and equally, and try to instill good values in students and staff. • When assessing the track record of fellow researchers, for example as a grant reviewer or appointments panel member, use a broad range of criteria, without undue reliance on journal impact factors. • Consider ways of sharing work with others wherever possible, for example, by choosing accessible journals, making published work available in public repositories and sharing datasets. • Engage with funders, publishers and learned societies to maintain a two-way dialogue and to contribute to policy-making, for example by responding to consultations, attending events or sitting on committees. • Seek out a mentor and/or be a mentor to someone else. • Frequently assess your career options and consider opportunities to widen your experience Download the project report and find out more at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/research- culture 4 Speaker biographies Elizabeth Adams Elizabeth Adams is the Researcher Development Manager at the University of Glasgow, where she manages professional and career development opportunities for early-career researchers. Elizabeth is the key point of contact for the University's HR Excellence in Research Award, the CROS and PRES surveys, research integrity training and the Research Staff Representative Forum. She is responsible for externally accredited training programmes for researchers (e.g. the Glasgow Postgraduate Leadership Programme), the 3 Minute Thesis Competition and the annual research staff conference. She clerks the University's Researcher Development Committee, supports researcher-led initiatives and works collaboratively with other institutions and Scottish research pools. Elizabeth is Deputy Convenor of the Universities Scotland Research Training sub-commmittee and represents the University on several national groups or forums to discuss issues relating to researcher development, enterprise training and research integrity. Elizabeth has a PhD in Chemistry and a CIPD Certificate in Learning and Development. She previously worked in the Education Team at the Royal Society of Chemistry,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • BSCB Newsletter 2017D
    2017 BSCB Newsletter BRITISH SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY Meet the new BSCB President Royal Opening of the Crick Meeting reports 2017 CONTENTS BSCB Newsletter News 2 Book reviews 7 Features 8 Meeting Reports 24 Summer students 30 Society Business 33 Editorial Welcome to the 2017 BSCB newsletter. After several meeting hosted several well received events for our Front cover: years of excellent service, Kate Nobes has stepped PhD and Postdoc members, which we discuss on The head of a Drosophila pupa. The developing down and handed the reins over to me. I’ve enjoyed page 5. Our PhD and Postdoc reps are working hard compound eye (green) is putting together this years’ newsletter. It’s been great to make the event bigger and better for next year! The composed of several hundred simple units called ommatidia to hear what our members have been up to, and I social events were well attended including the now arranged in an extremely hope you will enjoy reading it. infamous annual “Pub Quiz” and disco after the regular array. The giant conference dinner. Members will be relieved to know polyploidy cells of the fat body (red), the fly equivalent of the The 2016 BSCB/DB spring meeting, organised by our we aren’t including any photos from that here. mammalian liver and adipose committee members Buzz Baum (UCL), Silke tissue, occupy a big area of the Robatzek and Steve Royle, had a particular focus on In this issue, we highlight the great work the BSCB head. Cells and Tissue Architecture, Growth & Cell Division, has been doing to engage young scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Fellows of the Royal Society
    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Professor Jan Anderson FRS [1996] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Dr Mary Lyon FRS [1973] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Anne Mills FMedSci FRS [2013] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Brenda Milner CC FRS [1979] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Dr Anne O'Garra FMedSci FRS [2008] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Dame Bridget Ogilvie AC DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Doreen Cantrell FMedSci FRS [2011] Baroness Onora O'Neill * CBE FBA FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Lorna Casselton CBE FRS [1999] Dame Linda Partridge DBE FMedSci FRS [1996] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Dr Barbara Pearse FRS [1988] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Fiona Powrie FRS [2011] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Susan Rees FRS [2002] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Daniela Rhodes FRS [2007] Dame Kay Davies DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Elizabeth Robertson FRS [2003] Professor Caroline Dean OBE FRS [2004] Dame Carol Robinson DBE FMedSci
    [Show full text]
  • The Control of Shoot Branching: an Example of Plant Information Processing
    Plant, Cell and Environment (2009) 32, 694–703 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01930.x The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing OTTOLINE LEYSER Department of Biology, Area 11, University of York, York YO10 5YW, UK ABSTRACT the apical–basal axis defined by the establishment of the shoot apical meristem at one end, and the root apical mer- Throughout their life cycle, plants adjust their body plan istem at the other. Post-embryonically, the meristems give to suit the environmental conditions in which they are rise to the entire shoot and root systems, respectively. Fur- growing. A good example of this is in the regulation of thermore, the tissues they establish can produce secondary shoot branching. Axillary meristems laid down in each leaf meristems, which if activated can produce entirely new formed from the primary shoot apical meristem can remain axes of growth with the same developmental potential as dormant, or activate to produce a branch. The decision the primary root or shoot from which they were derived. whether to activate an axillary meristem involves the assess- Thus, the body plan of a plant is determined continuously ment of a wide range of external environmental, internal throughout its life cycle, allowing it to be exquisitely envi- physiological and developmental factors. Much of this infor- ronmentally responsive. Plants can alter their body plan to mation is conveyed to the axillary meristem via a network suit their environment, and thus the environmentally regu- of interacting hormonal signals that can integrate inputs lated development of new growth axes is functionally from diverse sources, combining multiple local signals to equivalent to environmentally regulated animal behav- generate a rich source of systemically transmitted informa- iours.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Annual Report 2015 Clare College Cambridge Contents Master’s Introduction .................................................................... 3 Teaching and Research .............................................................. 4–5 Selected Publications by Clare Fellows ....................................... 6–9 College Life ........................................................................... 10–12 Access & Outreach ..................................................................... 13 Financial Report ..................................................................... 14–15 Development ....................................................................... 16–17 List of Master & Fellows............................................................... 18 Captions ..................................................................................... 19 2 Master’s Introduction The past year has been full of many introductions for me two new CDs. They are fantastic ambassadors for the College and met some of our alumni in New as a relatively new Master - to student life in its various York - looking ahead; in 2016 they travel to Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore for more concerts. forms, to colleagues, and to our alumni at various events at home and abroad. The College continues to be in Last year I mentioned the need to refurbish Old Court, and this is still very much our priority. The good form, and weathering various new initiatives from Fellowship has just approved - in principle - plans which are now before Historic England,
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Auxin Agonists Induce Specific AUX/IAA Protein Degradation to Modulate Plant Development
    Selective auxin agonists induce specific AUX/IAA protein degradation to modulate plant development Thomas Vaina,1,2, Sara Raggia,1, Noel Ferrob, Deepak Kumar Barangea,c, Martin Kiefferd, Qian Maa, Siamsa M. Doylea, Mattias Thelandere, Barbora Parízkováf,g, Ondrej Nováka,f,g, Alexandre Ismailh, Per-Anders Enquistc, Adeline Rigala, Małgorzata Łangowskaa, Sigurd Ramans Harboroughd, Yi Zhangi, Karin Ljunga, Judy Callisj, Fredrik Almqvistc, Stefan Kepinskid, Mark Estellei, Laurens Pauwelsk,l, and Stéphanie Roberta,3 aDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Umeå Plant Science Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden; bInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, 53121 Bonn, Germany; cLaboratories for Chemical Biology Umeå, Chemical Biology Consortium Sweden, Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden; dCentre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, The Linnean Centre for Plant Biology in Uppsala, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden; fLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; gLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, CZ-78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; hSup’Biotech, IONIS Education Group, 94800 Villejuif, France; iSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0116; jDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; kDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; and lCenter for Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, 9052 Ghent, Belgium Edited by Ottoline Leyser, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and approved February 6, 2019 (received for review May 25, 2018) Auxin phytohormones control most aspects of plant development transcriptional response.
    [Show full text]
  • Engage Festival 2020 Engagement, Innovation and Change
    Engage Festival 2020 Engagement, Innovation and Change National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement #Engage2020 @NCCPE 01 NCCPE Engage Festival 2020 Introduction We’re really looking forward to welcoming you to the Engage Festival 2020 The Engage Festival is a week-long extravaganza of over 60 live events inviting you to explore and reimagine the role and future of public engagement, as COVID-19 redefines our world. Running from Monday 30th November – Friday 4th December, we have developed a rich programme of thought-provoking talks, interactive workshops, immersive experiences, and lots of creative ways for people to connect and network. Everyone’s experience of our current context is different, and we have timetabled our content to be suitable for a range of availabilities and engagement preferences. We invite people to curate their own unique engagement experience, picking and choosing from the options on offer – and ensuring the conference is tailored to you. This draft programme outlines the sessions on offer during the festival, including the platforms they’ll be hosted on. Each workshop lead is listed, and they will all be joined in their sessions by contributors from the wider sector. The Engage Festival will also be broadcasting live every day! So why not tune in to find out what has been happening during the day, and hear delegates, workshops leaders and our festival reporters reflecting on the festival themes. It provide a great way to hear the latest news, and to catch up on what you have missed. Facilitated by Jamie Gallagher, the daily review livestream will broadcast every afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTER S P E C I a L No 6 T U E S D Ay 24 a P R I L 2018 Vol Cxlviii
    CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY REPORTER S PECIAL NO 6 T UE S D AY 24 A PRIL 2018 VOL CXLVIII MEMBERS OF UNIVERSITY BODIES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNIVERSITY (‘OFFICERS NUMBER’, PARTS II AND III) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY [SPECIAL NO. 6 MEMBERS OF UNIVERSITY BODIES REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNIVERSITY P ART II: M E mb ER S OF U N I V ER S I T Y B ODIE S Nominating and appointing bodies: abbreviations 1 Faculty Boards and Degree Committees 18 Septemviri, Discipline Committee, University Tribunal 1 Committees 26 Discipline Board 2 Trustees, Managers, Awarders, of Funds, Council, Audit Committee, Finance Committee 2 Scholarships, Studentships, Prizes, etc. 32 General Board of the Faculties 2 Representatives of the Colleges for Election of Other Committees of the Central Bodies 2 Members of the Finance Committee 51 Boards of Electors to Professorships 6 P ART III: R EPRE S E ntAT I V E S OF th E U N I V ER S I T Y Advisory Committees for Elections to Professorships 7 Boards of Electors to offices other than Professorships 7 1. Representative Governors, etc. 52 Syndicates 8 2. Representative Trustees Associated with the Boards 9 University 53 Councils of the Schools 11 3. Cambridge Enterprise Ltd: Board of Directors 53 Appointments Committees 12 NOTICE BY thE EDITOR Following the publication of Part I of the Officers Number in February 2018, this issue of Part II (Members of University Bodies) and Part III (Representatives of the University) includes data received up to 13 April 2018. The next update of Part I (University Officers) will be published in Lent Term 2019 and an update to Parts II and III will follow shortly thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Image
    December 2004.GARNish Edition 2 The official GARNet newsletter Model to crop Harvesting the benefits from Arabidopsis research Also in this Issue - ATIDB - MIAME Compliance - AGRIKOLA - Election Results - Useful Websites Pg 2 GARNish The official GARNet newsletter A word from our Chairman Contents I would first like to wish all members of the UK Arabidopsis and plant News and Views Pg 3 genomics communities a very happy Christmas and a prosperous and successful New Year. This is a good time of year to both reflect on the Arabidopsis Resources past and look forward to the future. GARNet is changing and evolving AGRIKOLA Pg 4 from a consortium of Arabidopsis genomics service providers with a ATIDB Pg 5 steering committee to a democratically based coordination and community John Innes Genome Lab Pg 6 liaison organisation representing UK plant genomics in it’s broadest sense. NASC Pg 7 For those of you not that aware of GARNet’s history Ottoline Leyser has written a brief summary below. The annual GARNet meetings have played Brassica Resources a central role in re-establishing a feeling of community among UK [Cover Story] Arabidopsis groups and the continuing success of these meetings will Harvesting the opportunity from Pg 8 spread to the plant genomics researchers. An account of our successful Arabidopsis research 5th meeting held at Leicester in September this year can be read on page Genomics Resources Pg 9 4. Technology and access to technology have been a central part of the News from NASC Pg 10 mission of GARNet and in this issue of GARNish we have articles describing Arabidopsis resources available at NASC and the JIC.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Trade-Offs and Homeostasis in Arabidopsis Shoot Architectures
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Network trade-offs and homeostasis in Arabidopsis shoot architectures 1 1 2 2 Adam ConnID , Arjun ChandrasekharID , Martin van Rongen , Ottoline LeyserID , 3 1 Joanne ChoryID , Saket NavlakhaID * 1 Integrative Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 2 Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Plant Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Understanding the optimization objectives that shape shoot architectures remains a critical problem in plant biology. Here, we performed 3D scanning of 152 Arabidopsis shoot archi- tectures, including wildtype and 10 mutant strains, and we uncovered a design principle that OPEN ACCESS describes how architectures make trade-offs between competing objectives. First, we used Citation: Conn A, Chandrasekhar A, Rongen Mv, graph-theoretic analysis to show that Arabidopsis shoot architectures strike a Pareto optimal Leyser O, Chory J, Navlakha S (2019) Network that can be captured as maximizing performance in transporting nutrients and minimizing trade-offs and homeostasis in Arabidopsis shoot costs in building the architecture. Second, we identify small sets of genes that can be architectures. PLoS Comput Biol 15(9): e1007325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007325 mutated to shift the weight prioritizing one objective over the other. Third, we show that this prioritization weight feature is significantly less variable across replicates of the same geno- Editor: Giovanni Stracquadanio, University of Oxford, UNITED KINGDOM type compared to other common plant traits (e.g., number of rosette leaves, total volume occupied).
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-06-15-Mothers-In-Science.Pdf
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • EVENT PROGRAMME WELCOME UKRIO Dear Friends and Colleagues
    UKRIO UKRIO ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2021 EVENT PROGRAMME WELCOME UKRIO Dear friends and colleagues, I hope you and your loved ones are well in these challenging and changing times. The research community, like every part of society, has been greatly affected by the pandemic. Alongside the immense impact on health and wellbeing, how we work has had to change, sometimes radically. Existing pressures on researchers have heightened and new challenges have arisen. Following the changes imposed on the research community out of necessity, there has been increased discussion of our working practices and the pressures we face trying to ensure that our research is the best that it can be. How can we change things for the better? What practices should we retain and what might we do differently? I’m delighted that you are joining us for this year’s UKRIO conference. Our speakers will explore issues of good research practice in this changing world that we are living in, sharing lessons learned and also looking to the future. I hope you enjoy our event and I’m sure the fascinating talks will generate loads of interesting discussion. Our online events programme is allowing us to reach more people than ever and we’ll be continuing that in 2021 and beyond, with regular webinars and other virtual events. Please visit our website for more information on the work of our charity, including information on how to volunteer with us and how institutions can subscribe to UKRIO. James Parry Chief Executive, UK Research Integrity Office UKRIO ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2021 2 EVENT OVERVIEW Building on the successes of UKRIO’s monthly research integrity webinars, we This event will allow for interaction and encourages participants to share their have taken our annual conference entirely online.
    [Show full text]