DOCSLIB.ORG

Quick Overview of the Territorial Particularities of the Sex Ratio In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quick Overview of the Territorial Particularities of the Sex Ratio In Centre de Recherche de l’Institut de Démographie de l’Université Paris 1 Urban and Rural Population, 1978 Chukchi aut onomous93 dist rict North Caucasus and some 8 101 Murmansk region bordering regions 10 3 Kaliningrad region Republic of Karelia St. Pet ersburg 13 Leningrad12 region11 Pskov region 84 Novgorod region Nenet5 s aut onomous 6dist rict 98 24 25 Arkhangelsk7 region Taimyr (Dolgano- Nenet z) aut onomous dist rict Koryak aut onomous98 dist rict Quick overview of the territorial SmolenskTver region region 4 15 20 Vologda27 region Magadan region 18 Yaroslavl region Moscow citi 19 99 BryanskKaluga region region21 17 Republic of Komi 91 57 22MiMoscow26 r egion 59 37 IvanovoKost16 romaregion region 97 OryolTula region regionVladimir23 region Yamalo- Nenet z aut onomous dist rict Kursk region38 33 78 Republic of Yakut ia 35 Ryazan region 29 32 Lipetzk Nizhnyregion39 Novgorod Kirovregion region66 Kamchat ka region 36 30Komi-31 Permyat zky aut onomous dist rict Belgorod region Republic of Mariy El VoronezhTambovRepublic region region Chuvash45of Mordovia republic62 77 85 particularities of the sex ratio in Penza region48 Udmurt42 republicPerm65 Khantregion y- Mansi aut onomous dist rict 44 Ulyanovsk region 50 57 47Republic of Tat arst anSverdlovsk region 59 46 67 Evenki autonomous dist rict Rost ovVolgograd region Saratov region Samararegion region 100 Krasnodar50 t errit ory 61 43Republic of Adygeya 43 76 54 58 41 Republic64 of Bashkort68 ost an63 Chelyabinsk regionTyumen region Krasnoyarsk region 58 StavropolRepublic53 tAst errit of rakhan oryKalmykia region Orenburg region Kurgan region Khabarovsk territory 54 41 52 & 56 75 100 Kabardian- Balkar55 republic 74 Tomsk region 52 Omsk r egi on Republic Ingushof Nort 56republic h Osset ia 83 100 Russia and at the North Caucasus Chechen and Ingush republics 86 95Sakhalin region Chechen republic 51 73 Irkutsk region Republic of Dagest an Novosibirsk region 96 100 72 Amur region 53 Karachaev- Circassian republic 80 52 & 56 Kemerov region Chit a 88region 100 71 82 87 Altai territoryRepublic of Khakasia Republic of Buryat ia 92 55 Ust - Ordynsky Buryat aut onomous dist rict Jewish aut onomous oblast 52 70 81 89 Republic of RepublicAlt ai of Tuva Aginsky Buryat autonomous district 94 region in particular 56 Pr i mo r s k y k r ai 41 Republic of Kalmykia 51 43 Astrakhan Oblast (1.073) 0.951 to 1.020 5 regions by Alexandre AVDEEV 50 Republic of Adygeya 57 Krasnodar Kray 1020to10451.020 to 1.045 30 regions (IDUP Institut de démographie de l’Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne and Center 59 Rostov Oblast 1.045 to 1.065 43 regions 51 Republic of Dagestan 1.065 to 1.090 12 regions for population problems research at Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University) 52 Ingush Republic 53 Kabardino‐Balkar Republic 1.090 to 1.126 4 regions aavdeev@univ‐paris1.fr 54 Karachayevo‐Cherkess Republic 55 Republic of North Ossetia (1.071) 56 Chechen Republic 58 Stavropol Kray Centre for Population Problems Studies Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University 2 Urban and Rural Population, 2008 Urban and Rural Population, 2010 Chukchi autonomous district North Caucasus and some 8 93 101 Murmansk region North Caucasus and some bordering regions 10 3 Chukchi aut onomous93 dist rict Kaliningrad region Republic of Karelia 8 St. Petersburg 13 bordering regions Leningrad12 region11 Pskov region 84 101 Murmansk region Nenet5 s aut onomous dist rict 10 3 Novgorod region 6 98 24 Kaliningrad region 25 Arkhangelsk7 region Taimyr (Dolgano- Nenet z) aut onomous district Koryak aut onomous98 di st ri ct Republic of Karelia SmolenskTver region region 4 St. Petersburg 15 20 Vologda27 region Magadan region 13 11 18 Yaroslavl region Leningrad region Moscow citi 19 99 12 BryanskKaluga region region21 17 Republic of Komi 91 Pskov region 22Moscow26 region 5 84 57 59 37 Kost16 roma region 97 Novgorod region Nenet s aut onomous 6dist rict 98 Tu l a rVladimir e g i oIvanovo23 n region region Yamalo- Nenet z aut onomous dist rict Or yol r egi on 33 Republic of Yakut ia 24 Kursk region38 78 25 Arkhangelsk7 region Koryak aut onomous dist rict 35 Ryazan region 29 32 Kamchat ka regi on Tver region Taimyr (Dolgano- Nenet z) aut onomous dist rict 98 Lipetzk regionNi zhny39 Novgorod Kirovregi onregion66 57 59 Smolensk region 4 36 30Komi31- Permyatzky autonomousaut onomous districtdist rict 15 20 VlVo27logd da regi ion Belgorod region Republic of Mariy El 18 Magadan region TambovRepublic region Chuvash45of Mordovia republic62 77 Yaroslavl region Voronezh region 48 85 Moscow citi 99 BryanskKaluga region region21 19 Penza region 42 Perm65 Khantregion y- Mansi aut onomous dist rict Moscow26 region17 Republic of Komi 91 Udmurt republic 22 16 44 Ulyanovsk region 37 IvanovoKostroma region region 97 50 57 47Republic of Tat arst anSverdlovsk67 region Evenki aut onomous dist rict OryolTu region l a rVladimir e g i o23 n regi on Yamalo- Nenet z aut onomous dist rict 59 46 Kursk region38 33 78 Republic of Yakut ia VolgogradSaratov regi on Samararegion region 100 35 Ryazan region 29 32 Rost50 ov regi on Lipetzk Nizhnyregion39 Novgorod Kirovregion region66 Kamchat ka region 43 Krasnodar t erritory 61 36 30Komi-31 Permyat zky aut onomous dist rict Republic of Adygeya 43 76 50 Belgorod region 58 41 Republic64 of Bashkort68 ost an63 TambovRepublic region 45Republicof Mordovia of Mariy El 77 54 Voronezh regionChuvash republic62 85 58 Chelyabinsk regionTyumen region Krasnoyarsk region 48 65 41 StavropolRepublic53 territoryAst of rakhan Kalmykia region Orenburg region Kur gan regi on Khabarovsk territory Penza region Udmurt42 republicPerm Khantregion y- Mansi aut onomous dist rict 54 52 & 56 75 100 43 44 Ulyanovsk region 55 52 74 Tomsk region 47Republic of Tat arst anSverdlovsk region Omsk r egi on 57 59 46 67 Evenki aut onomous dist rict Ingush 56republic 83 100 VolgogradSaratov region region 100 Chechen and Ingush republics 86 95Sakhalin region 58 Rost ov region Samara region Chechen51 republic 73 Irkutsk region 54 41 Krasnodar50 t errit ory 61 53 Republic of Dagest an Novosibirsk region 96 100 Republic of Adygeya 43 Republic of Bashkort ost an 76 72 Amur regi on 54 58 41 64 68 63 Karachaev- Circassian republic Chelyabinsk regionTyumen region Krasnoyarsk region 52 & 56 Kemerov region 80 88 100 St avropolRepublic53 tAst errit of rakhan oryKalmykia region Orenburg region Kurgan region Khabarovsk territory Kabardian- Balkar republic 71 Chit a region 52 & 56 75 100 55 82 87Republic of Buryat ia 92 Kabardian- Balkar55 republic 74 To m sk r e g i o n 41 RepublicRepublic of Nort of h OssetKalmykia ia (1.028; 4432 LB) Altai territoryRepublic of Khakasia 53 52 Omsk r egi on 52 Ust - Ordynsky Buryat aut onomous dist rict Jewish autonomous oblast Republ ic Ingushof Nort 56republic h Osset ia 83 100 81 89 Chechen and Ingush republics 86 95Sakhalin region 70 Aginsky Buryat autonomous dist rict 94 52 & 56 Chechen51 republic 73 Irkut sk region 43 Astrakhan Oblast Republic of RepublicAlt ai of Tuva Republic of Dagest an Novosibirsk region 96 100 56 Primorsky krai 55 72 Amur region Karachaev- Circassian republic 52 80 50 Republic of Adygeya (1.065; 5688 LB) Kemerov region Chit a 88regi on 100 71 82 87 51 Altai territoryRepublic of Khakasia Republic of Buryat ia 92 56 Ust - Ordynsky Buryat aut onomous dist rict Jewish aut onomous oblast 57 Krasnodar Kray (1.058; 63624 LB) 70 81 89 0.805 to 1.020 8regions Republic of RepublicAlt ai of Tuva Aginsky Buryat aut onomous dist rict 94 51 Primorsky krai 59 Rostov Oblast (1.08; 45876 LB) 1.020 to 1.045 41 Republic of Kalmykia (1.082; 4354 LB) 21 regions 1.045 to 1.065 43 Astrakhan Oblast 9regions 51 Republic of Dagestan (1.07; 52075 LB) 37 regions 50 Republic of Adygeya (1.1; 5601 LB) 0.951 t o 1.020 52 Ingush Republic 1.065 to 1.090 23 regions 21 regions 57 Krasnodar Kray (1.075; 62383 LB) 1.020 t o 1.045 53 Kabardino‐Balkar Republic 1.090 to 1.144 6regions 51 Republic of Dagestan 59 Rostov Oblast (1.08; 45876 LB) 1.045 t o 1.065 28 regions 54 Karachayevo‐Cherkess Republic (1.009; 6139 LB) 52 Ingush Republic 1.065 t o 1.090 27 regions 55 Republic of North Ossetia 53 Kabardino‐Balkar Republic 1.090 t o 1.150 7regions 56 Chechen Republic (1.069; 37753 LB) In 2010, the SRB in the NCR was rather normal or even lower than the 54 Karachayevo‐Cherkess Republic (1.065; 6364 LB) 58 Stavropol Kray mean. Only Chechen republic and Dagestan have shown a little but not 55 Republic of North Ossetia exceptional increase. 56 Chechen Republic In 2088, the SRB was a little bit higher in the region bordering 58 Stavropol Kray The distribution of regions by the SRB level seems to be very symmetric, so there is no general tendency to the North Caucasus federal region. the SRB increase in Russia ? Is there some tendency to the SRB increasing in Russia ? 3 4 1 Distribution of Federal Territories of the Russia by the Geographical distribution of sex ratio at birth in Russia 2008 Sex Ratio at Birth in 2008 (total population) Total population Capital city population Simple distribution Weighted by number of live births Chukchi autonomous district Chukchi autonomous93 distr ict 8 93 8 SR: N = 89, Mean = 1.05557303, StdDv = 0.0266785953, Max = 1.148, Min = 0.987 101 Mur mansk r egion 101 Murmansk region 10 3 SR: N = 1713947, Mean = 1.05673412, StdDv = 0.0190374597, Max = 1.148, Min = 0.987 10 3 Kaliningr ad r egion 24 Kaliningrad region Republic of Kar elia Republic of Karelia St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Commissioner on National Minorities
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe High Commissioner on National Minorities The Hague, 12 January 2001 Dear Mr. Minister, In the beginning of last year the government of Ukraine requested me to investigate the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country. When I discussed this with your government, it offered to facilitate such an investigation. Earlier, your government had requested me to investigate the situation of Russian language education in Ukraine. The government of Ukraine also declared itself willing to facilitate such an investigation. In the summer of last year I have studied the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country, assisted by two experts, Prof. Bowring from the United Kingdom and Mr. Zhekov from Bulgaria. My conclusions are based on visits to Moscow, St. Petersburg and Tyumen, where conversations took place with local and regional authorities and with representatives of Ukrainian organisations. In Moscow extensive consultations took place with governmental authorities. While in Moscow, I also received representatives of Ukrainian organisations in Krasnodar, Ekatarinburg and Moscow Oblast. I want to thank your government for its co-operation. H.E. Mr. Igor Ivanov Minister of Foreign Affairs Moscow P.O. Box 20062 Telephone Telefax [email protected] 2500 EB, The Hague (+31-70) 312 55 00 (+31-70)363 59 10 http://www.osce.org Prinsessegracht 22 2514 AP, The Hague The Netherlands Earlier in the summer, I have conducted similar studies in Ukraine, again assisted by Prof. Bowring and Mr. Zhekov. I visited, Kharkiv, Lviv, Odessa and Simferopol, and met there with the local and regional authorities and with representatives of the Russian community.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument of Ratification)1
    Proposed Declaration (instrument of ratification)1 1. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Charter, the Russian Federation undertakes to apply the provisions of Part II to all the regional or minority languages spoken within its territory and which comply with the definition in Article 1. 2. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 2, and Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Charter, the Russian Federation declares that the provisions set out below shall apply to the following languages in the specified territories: Abaza (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Adyghe (Republic of Adygea), Aghul (Republic of Dagestan), Altai (Republic of Altai), Avar (Republic of Dagestan), Azeri (Republic of Dagestan), Balkar (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Bashkir (Republic of Bashkortostan), Buryat (Republic of Buryatia), Chechen (Republics of Chechnya and Dagestan), Cherkess (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Chuvash (Republic of Chuvashia), Dargin (Republic of Dagestan), Ingush (Republic of Ingushetia), Kabardian (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Kalmyk (Republic of Kalmykia), Karachay (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Khakas (Republic of Khakasia), Komi (Republic of Komi), Kumyk (Republic of Dagestan), Lak (Republic of Dagestan), Lezgian (Republic of Dagestan), Mountain and Meadow Mari (Republic of Mari El), Moksha and Erzya Mordovian (Republic of Mordovia), Nogai (Republics of Dagestan and Karachay-Cherkessia), Ossetic (Republic of North Ossetia), Rutul (Republic of Dagestan), Sakha (Republic of Sakha), Tabasaran (Republic of Dagestan), Tat (Republic of Dagestan), Tatar (Republic of Tatarstan), Tsakhur (Republic of Dagestan), Tuvan (Republic of Tuva) and Udmurt (Republic of Udmurtia) Article 8 – Education Paragraph 1.a.i; b.ii; c.ii; d.ii; e.ii; f.i; g; h; i. Article 9 – Judicial authorities Paragraph 1.a.ii; a.iii; a.iv; b.ii; b.iii; c.ii; c.iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 181 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Spatial Development of Territories (SDT 2020) The Role of Citi-forming Industrial Enterprises in the Development of Innovative and Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions (on the Example of Stary Oskol, Belgorod Region and the «OEMKINVEST ltd») Elena Chizhova Irina Rozdolskaya Department of the Theory and Science Methodology, Economics Department of Marketing and Management and Management Institute Belgorod University of Cooperation, Belgorod State Technological University Economics & Law named after V.G. Shukhov Belgorod, Russia Belgorod, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Sergey Chizhov VeraTuaeva Department of Economics and Production Organization, Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Economics and Management Institute Belgorod State Construction Engineering Institute Technological University Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov named after V.G. Shukhov Belgorod, Russia Belgorod, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The article considers the role of single-industry towns and city-forming enterprises in the formation of the I. INTRODUCTION investment attractiveness of the region. It is shown that from an In Russia, as in other countries of the world, there is a epoch of industrialisation we’ve got a problem of settlements of problem of single-industry town (monotown). Single- the various size having monoindustrial structure. But monocities of the Belgorod region which basic manufacture is industry town is characterized by the systemic unity of its the extraction of iron ore, have kept the specialisation and socio-economic organization and the functioning of the city- investment appeal. The city of Stary Oskol having single- forming enterprise [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation
    36117 V. 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Foreign Investment Advisory Service, Project is co-financed by the a joint service of the European Union International Finance Corporation in the framework of the and the World Bank Policy Advice Programme Public Disclosure Authorized SURVEY OF LAND AND REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CROSS-REGIONAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized March 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation. Cross-Regional Report The project has also received financial support from the Government of Switzerland, the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (seco). Report is prepared by the Media Navigator marketing agency, www.navigator,nnov.ru Disclaimer (EU) This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of its authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Disclaimer (FIAS) The Organizations (i.e. IBRD and IFC), through FIAS, have used their best efforts in the time available to provide high quality services hereunder and have relied on information provided to them by a wide range of other sources. However they do not make any representations or warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information included this report, or the results which would be achieved by following its recommendations. 2 Survey of Land and Real Estate Transactions in the Russian Federation. Cross-Regional Report TABLE OF
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Assessment of the Coupling Coordination Degree
    Comprehensive assessment of the coupling coordination degree between urbanization and ecological environment in the Siberian and Far East Federal Districts, Russia from 2005 to 2017 Ji Zheng1,2, Yingjie Hu3, Tamir Boldanov1,2, Tcogto Bazarzhapov1,2, Dan Meng1,2,YuLi1,2 and Suocheng Dong1,2 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3 College of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China ABSTRACT The urbanization growth in the 20th and 21st centuries has led to a series of unprecedented problems in the ecological environment. Based on constructing an integrated urbanization-ecological environment index system, this article conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the coupling coordination degree between urbanization and the ecological environment and uncovers its spatiotemporal variation characteristics in the Siberian and Far East Federal Districts, Russia from 2005 to 2017. The coupling coordination of urbanization and the ecological environment in the Siberian and Far East Federal Districts improve from slightly unbalanced development stage to barely balanced development stage from 2005 to 2017. In 2017, more than half regions achieved the barely balanced development of urbanization and the ecological environment. However, the most desirable development stage, the superior balanced development stage, is never achieved in the Siberian and Far East Submitted 4 December 2019 Federal Districts during the study period. The spatial pattern of the coupling 14 April 2020 Accepted coordination degree of urbanization and the ecological environment in the Siberian Published 15 June 2020 and Far East Federal District gradually changes from “dumbbell” to “high-north Corresponding authors ” Yu Li, [email protected] low-south .
    [Show full text]
  • The Intermediate Performance of Territories of Priority Socio-Economic Development in Russia in Conditions of Macroeconomic Instability
    MATEC Web of Conferences 106, 01028 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201710601028 SPbWOSCE-2016 The intermediate performance of territories of priority socio-economic development in Russia in conditions of macroeconomic instability Sergey Beliakov1,*, Anna Kapustkina1 1Moscow state university of civil engineering, YaroslavskoyeShosse, 26, Moscow, 12933, Russia Abstract. The Russian economy in recent years has faced the influence of a number of negative factors due to macroeconomic instability and increased foreign policy tensions. In these conditions the considerable constraints faced processes of socio-economic development of regions of the Russian Federation. In this article the authors attempt to analyze the key indicators of socio-economic development of the regions in which it was created and operate in the territories of priority socio-economic development. These territories are concentrated in the Far Eastern Federal District. The article identified, processed, and interpreted indicators, allowing to produce a conclusion on the interim effectiveness of the territories of priority socio-economic development in Russia in conditions of macroeconomic instability. 1 Introduction The main purpose of socio-economic policy is to increase the standard of living, increasing prosperity and ensuring social guarantees to the population. Without these indicators, it is impossible to imagine the effective development of civil society and of the economy as a whole. The crisis in macroeconomics and world politics led to the deterioration of the General economic situation in Russia and, as consequence, decrease in level of living of the population [1, 2]. 2 Experimental section Statistics show that in most Russian regions indicators of the level of living of the population significantly differ from similar indicators in the regional centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Finno-Ugrian Cooperation and Foreign Relations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Eastern Finno-Ugrian cooperation and foreign relations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4gc7x938 Journal Nationalities Papers, 29(1) ISSN 0090-5992 Author Taagepera, R Publication Date 2001-04-24 DOI 10.1080/00905990120036457 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Nationalities Papers, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2001 EASTERN FINNO-UGRIAN COOPERATION AND FOREIGN RELATIONS Rein Taagepera Britons and Iranians do not wax poetic when they discover that “one, two, three” sound vaguely similar in English and Persian. Finns and Hungarians at times do. When I speak of “Finno-Ugrian cooperation,” I am referring to a linguistic label that joins peoples whose languages are so distantly related that in most world contexts it would evoke no feelings of kinship.1 Similarities in folk culture may largely boil down to worldwide commonalities in peasant cultures at comparable technological stages. The racial features of Estonians and Mari may be quite disparate. Limited mutual intelligibility occurs only within the Finnic group in the narrow sense (Finns, Karelians, Vepsians, Estonians), the Permic group (Udmurts and Komi), and the Mordvin group (Moksha and Erzia). Yet, despite this almost abstract foundation, the existence of a feeling of kinship is very real. Myths may have no basis in fact, but belief in myths does occur. Before denigrating the beliefs of indigenous and recently modernized peoples as nineteenth-century relics, the observer might ask whether the maintenance of these beliefs might serve some functional twenty-first-century purpose. The underlying rationale for the Finno-Ugrian kinship beliefs has been a shared feeling of isolation among Indo-European and Turkic populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment and Business Climate in the Astrakhan Region1
    European Union Organisation for Economic North-West Co-operation and Development Investment Agency OECD WORKSHOP INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS CLIMATE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: A REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE ST. PETERSBURG, 9-10 NOVEMBER 2005 INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS CLIMATE IN THE ASTRAKHAN REGION1 Introduction 1. This study reviews the recent foreign direct investment (FDI) situation in the Astrakhan region in the larger context of Russia’s FDI developments. It analyses the advantages and drawbacks of the regional economic position, including its natural resources, human potential, economic policy and legal framework relevant for existing and potential foreign investors. It describes regional investment promotion and facilitation efforts, such as the plans to create a special economic zone in the region, and considers other initiatives aimed at improving the investment and business climate in the region. Finally the study proposes several policy options to promote foreign investment at regional level, in particular by suggesting the creation of a regional zone. 1. Foreign direct investment in the Russian Federation 1.1. Recent developments 2. Russia suffers from a low rate of capital investment which limits its economic growth potential. Rather than resulting from insufficient domestic savings, this situation mainly stems from a lack of confidence by Russian investors in the investment climate, as also indicated by persistently high capital flights.2 According to the Federal Service for State Statistics, Russian investments abroad outstrip foreign investment in Russia, with the main recipients being Belarus (16%), Iran (15%), Cyprus (13%), Netherlands (12%), followed by Liberia, Moldova, Armenia, Virgin Islands, United States and Germany. 3. The strategy of rapid switch from plan to market reduced considerably many formal obstacles to foreign investment, allowing FDI inflows to rise in the mid-1990s, peaking at USD4.9 billion in 1997, the year before the economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus: the Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law
    The North Caucasus: The Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law Europe Report N°226 | 6 September 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Russia between Decentralisation and the “Vertical of Power” ....................................... 3 A. Federative Relations Today ....................................................................................... 4 B. Local Government ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Funding and budgets ................................................................................................. 6 III. Elections ........................................................................................................................... 9 A. State Duma Elections 2011 ........................................................................................ 9 B. Presidential Elections 2012 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Agroecological And Economic Substantiation Of Agriculture Biologization Elements. Alersandr V Turianskii, Andreii F Dorofeev, Aleksandr V Akinchin*, Sergeii A Linkov, and Aleksey G Stupakov. V.Ia. Gorin Belgorod State Agrarian University, 308503 Belgorod Region, Belgorodsky District, Maisky Village, Vavilova str. 1. ABSTRACT An intensive farming triggers mineralization of humus, which leads to a deterioration in the agrochemical, physicochemical, biological, and other properties of the soil. In this regard, the means for the biologization of agriculture should be given much more attention as a powerful means of increasing the fertility of the soil and the economic efficiency of agricultural production. The presented data testify to the positive influence of green manure crops as an element of biologization on the productivity of agricultural crops and the indices of soil fertility. In general, the most economically feasible for the crops studied is the variant of mustard embedding with the Sun Flower unit, which profitability level averaged 77.5%. While the least cost-effective was the option with the use of unembedded buckwheat - only 39.5%. Keywords: biologization of agriculture, green manure crop, soil cultivation, economic efficiency. *Corresponding author September–October 2018 RJPBCS 9(5) Page No. 1370 ISSN: 0975-8585 INTRODUCTION Solving the tasks of ecological safety of modern farming systems and increasing their economic efficiency should be connected with the biology of agriculture and energy conservation, one of the main principles of which is the preservation and improvement of soil fertility through the use of organic fertilizers [4, 5, 8, 9, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23], while the need for rational nature management is strengthened by the transition to sustainable development of rural areas and the "green" economy, the development of the concept of land use ecologization (3, 6.7.10).
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitic Nematodes of Pool Frog (Pelophylax Lessonae) in the Volga Basin
    Journal MVZ Cordoba 2019; 24(3):7314-7321. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1501 Research article Parasitic nematodes of Pool Frog (Pelophylax lessonae) in the Volga Basin Igor V. Chikhlyaev1 ; Alexander B. Ruchin2* ; Alexander I. Fayzulin1 1Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin, Russian Academy of Sciences, Togliatti, Russia 2Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny», Saransk, Russia. *Correspondence: [email protected] Received: Febrary 2019; Accepted: July 2019; Published: August 2019. ABSTRACT Objetive. Present a modern review of the nematodes fauna of the pool frog Pelophylax lessonae (Camerano, 1882) from Volga basin populations on the basis of our own research and literature sources analysis. Materials and methods. Present work consolidates data from different helminthological works over the past 80 years, supported by our own research results. During the period from 1936 to 2016 different authors examined 1460 specimens of pool frog, using the method of full helminthological autopsy, from 13 regions of the Volga basin. Results. In total 9 nematodes species were recorded. Nematode Icosiella neglecta found for the first time in the studied host from the territory of Russia and Volga basin. Three species appeared to be more widespread: Oswaldocruzia filiformis, Cosmocerca ornata and Icosiella neglecta. For each helminth species the following information included: systematic position, areas of detection, localization, biology, list of definitive hosts, the level of host-specificity. Conclusions. Nematodes of pool frog, excluding I. neglecta, belong to the group of soil-transmitted helminthes (geohelminth) and parasitize in adult stages. Some species (O. filiformis, C. ornata, I. neglecta) are widespread in the host range.
    [Show full text]
  • MH17 - Potential Suspects and Witnesses from the 53Rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade
    MH17 - Potential Suspects and Witnesses from the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade A bell¿ngcat Investigation Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Section One: The 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ...................................................................................3 Section Two: Mobilization of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ................................................... 9 The 23-25 June 2014 Buk Convoy Vehicles ............................................................................................. 10 The 19-21 July 2014 Buk Convoy Vehicles .................................................................................................. 15 The 16 August 2014 Missile Transport ........................................................................................................ 17 Deployment of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade in the Summer of 2014 ....................... 20 Section Three: Soldiers of the 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade ...................................................... 23 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 2nd Battalion of the 53rd Brigade in 2013 .................................................................................................... 26 3rd Battalion of the
    [Show full text]