The Cellular Function of USP22 and Its Role in Tissue Maintenance and Tumor Formation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cellular Function of USP22 and Its Role in Tissue Maintenance and Tumor Formation The Cellular Function of USP22 and its Role in Tissue Maintenance and Tumor Formation Dissertation for the award of the degree “Doctor rerum naturalium” of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, within the doctoral program “Molecular Biology of Cells” of the Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) submitted by Robyn Laura Kosinsky from Emmerich am Rhein, Germany Göttingen, 2017 Thesis supervisor Prof. Steven A. Johnsen, Ph.D. Thesis committee Prof. Steven A. Johnsen, Ph.D. Clinic for General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen, Germany Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Holger Reichardt Institute for Cellular and Molecular Immunology University of Göttingen Medical School Göttingen, Germany Prof. Dr. med. Heidi Hahn Institute for Human Genetics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen, Germany Date of oral examination: 17.02.2017 i Affidavit I hereby declare that the Ph.D. thesis entitled “The Cellular Function of USP22 and its Role in Tissue Maintenance and Tumor Formation” has been written independently and with no other sources and aids than quoted. Göttingen, 03.01.2017 _______________________________ Robyn Laura Kosinsky ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents .................................................................................................................iii Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................vii List of figures ..................................................................................................................... xvi List of tables....................................................................................................................... xix Abstract ...............................................................................................................................xx 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Epidemiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) ..................................................................... 1 1.2 Risk factors associated with CRC ................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Diet and lifestyle .................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) ...................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Genetic susceptibility ............................................................................................. 4 1.2.4 Genetic mutations .................................................................................................. 7 1.2.5 Epigenetic deregulation ......................................................................................... 9 1.3 The composition of the intestinal system .....................................................................12 1.4 The intestinal microbiota ..............................................................................................16 1.5 The intestinal immune defense and ulcerative colitis ...................................................17 1.6 Colorectal tumor progression .......................................................................................20 1.7 Colorectal cancer detection .........................................................................................22 1.8 Classification of CRC subtypes ...................................................................................23 1.8.1 Histopathological classification ..............................................................................23 1.8.2 Molecular classification .........................................................................................24 1.9 Colorectal cancer treatment.........................................................................................26 1.10 Heterogeneity of colorectal cancer ............................................................................28 1.11 Murine models for ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer .........................................30 1.12 Ubiquitination and cancer ..........................................................................................32 iii 1.13 USP22 as a crucial player of CRC .............................................................................34 1.14 Implications of USP22 in intestinal cell differentiation (preliminary data) ....................37 1.15 Objectives of this study ..............................................................................................40 2. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................42 2.1 Materials......................................................................................................................42 2.1.1 Technical devices .................................................................................................42 2.1.2 Consumables ........................................................................................................45 2.1.3 Chemicals and reagents .......................................................................................47 2.1.4 Cell culture ............................................................................................................52 2.1.5 Kits .......................................................................................................................53 2.1.6 Oligonucleotides ...................................................................................................54 2.1.7 Antibodies .............................................................................................................56 2.1.8 Buffers ..................................................................................................................57 2.1.9 Software and tools ................................................................................................59 2.2 Methods ......................................................................................................................60 2.2.1 Animal studies ......................................................................................................60 2.2.1.2 Tamoxifen injection .........................................................................................60 2.2.1.4 Stool guaiac test .............................................................................................61 2.2.1.5 Determination of disease activity index (DAI) ..................................................61 2.2.1.6 Tissue isolation ...............................................................................................62 2.2.1.7 Serum isolation ...............................................................................................62 2.2.1.8 Isolation of intestinal epithelial cells ................................................................62 2.2.1.9 X-gal staining of embryos ...............................................................................63 2.2.1.10 Preparation of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) ....................................63 2.2.1.11 Preparation of paraffin-embedded tissue ......................................................64 2.2.1.12 H&E and Nissl staining .................................................................................64 2.2.1.13 Immunohistochemistry (IHC) ........................................................................65 2.2.1.14 Histo-score (H-score) ...................................................................................65 2.2.1.15 Mechanical bone testing ...............................................................................66 2.2.2 Cell culture ............................................................................................................66 2.2.2.1 Cell culture and inhibitor treatment .................................................................66 2.2.2.2 siRNA transfection ..........................................................................................66 2.2.2.3 Proliferation assessment ................................................................................67 2.2.2.4 Migration assay ..............................................................................................67 2.2.2.5 Colony formation assay ..................................................................................67 2.2.2.6 Soft agar colony formation assay ....................................................................68 2.2.2.7 CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of USP22 ..................................................68 2.2.3 Molecular biology techniques ................................................................................69 2.2.3.1 DNA extraction from tail biopsies or cells ........................................................69 2.2.3.2 Genotyping of experimental mice ...................................................................69 iv 2.2.3.3 RNA isolation ..................................................................................................70 2.2.3.4 RNA gel electrophoresis .................................................................................70 2.2.3.5 cDNA synthesis ..............................................................................................70 2.2.3.6 Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) ..............................................................71 2.2.3.7 Luciferase reporter assay ...............................................................................71
Recommended publications
  • Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
    hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members
    7INTERs3PRING 4HE'3!2EPORTER winter s spring 2012 New Executive GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members Director Now on Board The Genetics Society of America New Members of the GSA Board of welcomes four new members elected Directors Adam P. Fagen, by the general membership to the Ph.D., stepped in as 2012 GSA Board of Directors. The VICE PRESIDENT: GSA’s new Executive new members are: Michael Lynch Michael Lynch, Director beginning (Indiana University), who serves as Distinguished December 1, 2011. vice president in 2012 and as GSA Professor of Dr. Fagen previously president in 2013 and Marnie E. Biology, Class of was at the American Halpern (Carnegie Institution for 1954 Professor, Society of Plant Science); Mohamed Noor (Duke Department of Biologists (ASPB), University); and John Schimenti Biology, Indiana where he was the director of public (Cornell University), who will serve as University, continued on page nineteen directors. Bloomington. Dr. Lynch is a population and evolutionary biologist and a In addition to these elected officers, long-time member of GSA. Dr. Lynch 2012 Brenda J. Andrews (University of sees GSA as the home for geneticists Toronto), Editor-in-Chief of GSA’s who study a broad base of topics GSA Award journal, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, and organisms, and as a forum Recipients which was first published online in where general discussion occurs, June 2011, becomes a member of the whether based on the principles Announced Board of Directors. The bylaws have of genetics, the most pressing historically included the GENETICS GSA is pleased to announce the issues within the discipline itself, or editor-in-chief on the Board and as a responses to societal concerns and/ 2012 recipients of its five awards result of a 2011 bylaw revision, the G3 for distinguished service in the or conflicts within applied genetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Aneuploidy: Using Genetic Instability to Preserve a Haploid Genome?
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science (Cancer Biology) Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Submitted by: Ramona Ramdath In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Science Examination Committee Signature/Date Major Advisor: David Allison, M.D., Ph.D. Academic James Trempe, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: David Giovanucci, Ph.D. Randall Ruch, Ph.D. Ronald Mellgren, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: April 10, 2009 Aneuploidy: Using genetic instability to preserve a haploid genome? Ramona Ramdath University of Toledo, Health Science Campus 2009 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my grandfather who died of lung cancer two years ago, but who always instilled in us the value and importance of education. And to my mom and sister, both of whom have been pillars of support and stimulating conversations. To my sister, Rehanna, especially- I hope this inspires you to achieve all that you want to in life, academically and otherwise. ii Acknowledgements As we go through these academic journeys, there are so many along the way that make an impact not only on our work, but on our lives as well, and I would like to say a heartfelt thank you to all of those people: My Committee members- Dr. James Trempe, Dr. David Giovanucchi, Dr. Ronald Mellgren and Dr. Randall Ruch for their guidance, suggestions, support and confidence in me. My major advisor- Dr. David Allison, for his constructive criticism and positive reinforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yeast Phenomic Model for the Influence of Warburg Metabolism on Genetic Buffering of Doxorubicin Sean M
    Santos and Hartman Cancer & Metabolism (2019) 7:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-019-0201-3 RESEARCH Open Access A yeast phenomic model for the influence of Warburg metabolism on genetic buffering of doxorubicin Sean M. Santos and John L. Hartman IV* Abstract Background: The influence of the Warburg phenomenon on chemotherapy response is unknown. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mimics the Warburg effect, repressing respiration in the presence of adequate glucose. Yeast phenomic experiments were conducted to assess potential influences of Warburg metabolism on gene-drug interaction underlying the cellular response to doxorubicin. Homologous genes from yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were analyzed to infer evolutionary conservation of gene-drug interaction and predict therapeutic relevance. Methods: Cell proliferation phenotypes (CPPs) of the yeast gene knockout/knockdown library were measured by quantitative high-throughput cell array phenotyping (Q-HTCP), treating with escalating doxorubicin concentrations under conditions of respiratory or glycolytic metabolism. Doxorubicin-gene interaction was quantified by departure of CPPs observed for the doxorubicin-treated mutant strain from that expected based on an interaction model. Recursive expectation-maximization clustering (REMc) and Gene Ontology (GO)-based analyses of interactions identified functional biological modules that differentially buffer or promote doxorubicin cytotoxicity with respect to Warburg metabolism. Yeast phenomic and cancer pharmacogenomics data were integrated to predict differential gene expression causally influencing doxorubicin anti-tumor efficacy. Results: Yeast compromised for genes functioning in chromatin organization, and several other cellular processes are more resistant to doxorubicin under glycolytic conditions. Thus, the Warburg transition appears to alleviate requirements for cellular functions that buffer doxorubicin cytotoxicity in a respiratory context.
    [Show full text]
  • Humankind 2.0: the Technologies of the Future 6. Biotech
    Humankind 2.0: The Technologies of the Future 6. Biotech Piero Scaruffi, 2017 See http://www.scaruffi.com/singular/human20.html for the full text of this discussion A brief History of Biotech 1953: Discovery of the structure of the DNA 2 A brief History of Biotech 1969: Jon Beckwith isolates a gene 1973: Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer create the first recombinant DNA organism 1974: Waclaw Szybalski coins the term "synthetic biology” 1975: Paul Berg organizes the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA 3 A brief History of Biotech 1976: Genentech is founded 1977: Fred Sanger invents a method for rapid DNA sequencing and publishes the first full DNA genome of a living being Janet Rossant creates a chimera combining two mice species 1980: Genentech’s IPO, first biotech IPO 4 A brief History of Biotech 1982: The first biotech drug, Humulin, is approved for sale (Eli Lilly + Genentech) 1983: Kary Mullis invents the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for copying genes 1986: Leroy Hood invents a way to automate gene sequencing 1986: Mario Capecchi performs gene editing on a mouse 1990: William French Anderson’s gene therapy 1990: First baby born via PGD (Alan Handyside’s lab) 5 A brief History of Biotech 1994: FlavrSavr Tomato 1994: Maria Jasin’s homing endonucleases for genome editing 1996: Srinivasan Chandrasegaran’s ZFN method for genome editing 1996: Ian Wilmut clones the first mammal, the sheep Dolly 1997: Dennis Lo detects fetal DNA in the mother’s blood 2000: George Davey Smith introduces Mendelian randomization 6 A brief History of Biotech
    [Show full text]
  • Open Data for Differential Network Analysis in Glioma
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Open Data for Differential Network Analysis in Glioma , Claire Jean-Quartier * y , Fleur Jeanquartier y and Andreas Holzinger Holzinger Group HCI-KDD, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2/V, 8036 Graz, Austria; [email protected] (F.J.); [email protected] (A.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 27 October 2019; Accepted: 3 January 2020; Published: 15 January 2020 Abstract: The complexity of cancer diseases demands bioinformatic techniques and translational research based on big data and personalized medicine. Open data enables researchers to accelerate cancer studies, save resources and foster collaboration. Several tools and programming approaches are available for analyzing data, including annotation, clustering, comparison and extrapolation, merging, enrichment, functional association and statistics. We exploit openly available data via cancer gene expression analysis, we apply refinement as well as enrichment analysis via gene ontology and conclude with graph-based visualization of involved protein interaction networks as a basis for signaling. The different databases allowed for the construction of huge networks or specified ones consisting of high-confidence interactions only. Several genes associated to glioma were isolated via a network analysis from top hub nodes as well as from an outlier analysis. The latter approach highlights a mitogen-activated protein kinase next to a member of histondeacetylases and a protein phosphatase as genes uncommonly associated with glioma. Cluster analysis from top hub nodes lists several identified glioma-associated gene products to function within protein complexes, including epidermal growth factors as well as cell cycle proteins or RAS proto-oncogenes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histone H2B-Specific Ubiquitin Ligase RNF20/Hbre1 Acts As a Putative Tumor Suppressor Through Selective Regulation of Gene Expression
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The histone H2B-specific ubiquitin ligase RNF20/hBRE1 acts as a putative tumor suppressor through selective regulation of gene expression Efrat Shema,1 Itay Tirosh,2 Yael Aylon,1 Jing Huang,3 Chaoyang Ye,3 Neta Moskovits,1 Nina Raver-Shapira1, Neri Minsky,1,8 Judith Pirngruber,4 Gabi Tarcic,5 Pavla Hublarova,6 Lilach Moyal,7 Mali Gana-Weisz,7 Yosef Shiloh,7 Yossef Yarden,5 Steven A. Johnsen,4 Borivoj Vojtesek,6 Shelley L. Berger,3 and Moshe Oren1,9 1Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; 2Department of Molecular Genetics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; 3Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; 4Department of Molecular Oncology, Gottingen Center for Molecular Biosciences, Gottingen 37077, Germany; 5Department of Biological Regulation, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; 6Department of Oncological and Experimental Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic; 7Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Histone monoubiquitylation is implicated in critical regulatory processes. We explored the roles of histone H2B ubiquitylation in human cells by reducing the expression of hBRE1/RNF20, the major H2B-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase. While H2B ubiquitylation is broadly associated with transcribed genes, only a subset of genes was transcriptionally affected by RNF20 depletion and abrogation of H2B ubiquitylation. Gene expression dependent on RNF20 includes histones H2A and H2B and the p53 tumor suppressor.
    [Show full text]
  • Far Upstream Element Binding Protein 1: a Commander of Transcription, Translation and Beyond
    Oncogene (2013) 32, 2907–2916 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Far upstream element binding protein 1: a commander of transcription, translation and beyond J Zhang and QM Chen The far upstream binding protein 1 (FBP1) was first identified as a DNA-binding protein that regulates c-Myc gene transcription through binding to the far upstream element (FUSE) in the promoter region 1.5 kb upstream of the transcription start site. FBP1 collaborates with TFIIH and additional transcription factors for optimal transcription of the c-Myc gene. In recent years, mounting evidence suggests that FBP1 acts as an RNA-binding protein and regulates mRNA translation or stability of genes, such as GAP43, p27 Kip and nucleophosmin. During retroviral infection, FBP1 binds to and mediates replication of RNA from Hepatitis C and Enterovirus 71. As a nuclear protein, FBP1 may translocate to the cytoplasm in apoptotic cells. The interaction of FBP1 with p38/ JTV-1 results in FBP1 ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasomes. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulations by FBP1 contribute to cell proliferation, migration or cell death. FBP1 association with carcinogenesis has been reported in c-Myc dependent or independent manner. This review summarizes biochemical features of FBP1, its mechanism of action, FBP family members and the involvement of FBP1 in carcinogenesis. Oncogene (2013) 32, 2907–2916; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.350; published online 27 August 2012 Keywords: FBP1; FUSE; cancer INTRODUCTION IDENTIFICATION OF FBP1 The far upstream element binding protein 1 (FBP1) was first FBP1 was first cloned from a cDNA library generated from the discovered as a transcriptional regulator of the proto-oncogene undifferentiated human monoblastic line U937.6 Such an c-Myc.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionarily Conserved Protein ERH Controls CENP-E Mrna Splicing and Is Required for the Survival of KRAS Mutant Cancer Cells
    Evolutionarily conserved protein ERH controls CENP-E PNAS PLUS mRNA splicing and is required for the survival of KRAS mutant cancer cells Meng-Tzu Wenga,b,c, Jih-Hsiang Leea, Shu-Chen Weid, Qiuning Lia, Sina Shahamatdara, Dennis Hsua, Aaron J. Schettere, Stephen Swatkoskif, Poonam Mannang, Susan Garfieldg, Marjan Gucekf, Marianne K. H. Kima, Christina M. Annunziataa, Chad J. Creightonh, Michael J. Emanuelei, Curtis C. Harrise, Jin-Chuan Sheud, Giuseppe Giacconea, and Ji Luoa,1 aMedical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; bGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; cFar-Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220, Taiwan; dDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan; eLaboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; fProteomics Core Facility, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; gConfocal Microscopy Core Facility, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; hDepartment of Medicine and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Division of Biostatistics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and iDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115 Edited by Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, and approved November 12, 2012 (received for review June 1, 2012) Cancers with Ras mutations represent a major therapeutic prob- anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) that coordinately maintain lem. Recent RNAi screens have uncovered multiple nononcogene the fidelity of chromosome segregation (6). Symmetrical distribu- addiction pathways that are necessary for the survival of Ras mu- tion of chromosomes during mitosis is critical for genomic stability tant cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Facultad De Ciencias Universidad Autónoma De San Luis Potosí
    Boletín de La Ciencia en San Luis Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí No.1, 8 de junio de 1998 Presentación Boletín de información científica y El noticiero radiofónico La Ciencia en tecnológica de la Facultad de Ciencias San Luis que recientemente celebró su quinto aniversario, ha cumplido un ciclo. Publicación semanal A partir de esta fecha dejará de transmitirse por Radio Universidad; sin embargo, para continuar su labor de Edición y textos difusión el contenido del noticiero Fís. J. Refugio Martínez Mendoza aparecerá en forma de boletín. Además para recalcar su dependencia de la Facultad de Ciencias se incluirá una Cualquier información, artículo o sección que trata sobre las noticias e anuncio deberá enviarse al editor informaciones académicas de la e-mail: [email protected] Facultad, con lo cual se pretende sirva Este boletín puede consultarse por como un enlace y un medio de Internet en la página de la UASLP comunicación interna. Agradecemos las facilidades que se le den a este Boletín, así como cualquier colaboración que la · Einstein sigue dando de que hablar comunidad de la Facultad de Ciencias y de la Universidad quiera realizar. · Ahora la oveja clonada es madre Ponemos a disposición de los estudiantes de la Facultad este medio para cualquier · Argenina, un nutriente importante opinión o inquietud académica que tengan que comunicar, con respecto al · Más sobre terapias para tratar el desarrollo de nuestra Facultad y de SIDA nuestra Universidad. En principio, siempre y cuando se respeten las formas · Dinosaurios y aves de relación respetuosa, no habrá censura; por lo que se pueden expresar opiniones y críticas “positivas”.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity 1 and 2 Overview
    2013 Holiday Lectures on Science OVERVIEW OF CANCER DISCOVERY ACTIVITIES Medicine in the Genomic Era EDUCATOR MATERIALS OVERVIEW OF CANCER DISCOVERY ACTIVITIES This educator guide provides support for two Cancer Discovery activities, both based on a Howard Hughes Medical Institute 2013 Holiday Lectures on Science video featuring researcher Dr. Charles L. Sawyers. Students begin by watching the online video clip, Cancer as a Genetic Disease (http://www.hhmi.org/biointeractive/ cancer-genetic-disease-video-highlights), and completing the accompanying Video Worksheet. After that assignment, instructors can decide which of the two activities to use in class. Activity 1: Classifying Cancer Genes In Activity 1, students identify the locations on chromosomes of genes involved in cancer, or “cancer genes.” Using the set of 139 Cancer Gene Cards and associated chromosome posters, students discover the following: • About 140 human genes are currently known to be involved in cancer. • Cancer genes are located throughout the human genome. • The proportion of oncogenes versus tumor suppressor genes is roughly equal. • The main cellular processes affected by mutations in cancer genes are cell survival, cell fate, and genome maintenance. • One way to visualize genetic data is to map genes onto chromosomes. Activity 2: Examining Cancer Patient Data In Activity 2, students explore the genetic basis of cancer by examining cards that list genetic mutations found in the DNA of actual cancer patients. Small-group work spurs discussion about the genes that are mutated in different types of cancers and the cellular processes that the affected genes control. Students are asked to identify patterns and trends in the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Usp22 Overexpression Leads to Aberrant Signal Transduction of Cancer-Related Pathways but Is Not Sufficient to Drive Tumor Formation in Mice
    cancers Article Usp22 Overexpression Leads to Aberrant Signal Transduction of Cancer-Related Pathways but Is Not Sufficient to Drive Tumor Formation in Mice Xianghong Kuang 1,2, Michael J. McAndrew 1,2,3, Lisa Maria Mustachio 1,2, Ying-Jiun C. Chen 1,2, Boyko S. Atanassov 4 , Kevin Lin 1,2, Yue Lu 1,2, Jianjun Shen 1,2, Andrew Salinger 1,2, Timothy Macatee 1,2, Sharon Y. R. Dent 1,2,* and Evangelia Koutelou 1,2,* 1 Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX 78957, USA; [email protected] (X.K.); [email protected] (M.J.M.); [email protected] (L.M.M.); [email protected] (Y.-J.C.C.); [email protected] (K.L.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (T.M.) 2 Center for Cancer Epigenetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA 3 Luminex Corporation, 12212 Technology Blvd. Suite 130, Austin, TX 78721, USA 4 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.Y.R.D.); [email protected] (E.K.) Simple Summary: Increased levels of the Usp22 deubiquitinase have been observed in several types Citation: Kuang, X.; McAndrew, of human cancer, particularly highly aggressive, therapy-resistant tumors. However, the role of M.J.; Mustachio, L.M.; Chen, Y.-J.C.; Usp22 overexpression in cancer etiology is not known. To address whether Usp22 overexpression Atanassov, B.S.; Lin, K.; Lu, Y.; Shen, is sufficient to induce tumors in vivo, we created a mouse that expresses high levels of Usp22 in all J.; Salinger, A.; Macatee, T.; et al.
    [Show full text]