DKIE: Open Source Information Extraction for Danish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DKIE: Open Source Information Extraction for Danish DKIE: Open Source Information Extraction for Danish Leon Derczynski Camilla Vilhelmsen Field Kenneth S. Bøgh University of Sheffield University of Southern Denmark Aarhus University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Interoperability: DKIE is internally consistent and adopts unified, well-grounded solutions to the Danish is a major Scandinavian language problems of processing Danish. Where possible, spoken daily by around six million peo- DKIE re-uses existing components, and strives for ple. However, it lacks a unified, open set compatibility with major text processing architec- of NLP tools. This demonstration will in- tures. troduce DKIE, an extensible open-source toolkit for processing Danish text. We im- Portability: It is preferable for developed com- plement an information extraction archi- ponents to be readily movable within the chosen tecture for Danish within GATE, including architecture, GATE, and without, usable indepen- integrated third-party tools. This imple- dently. mentation includes the creation of a sub- Openness: The resultant application, and cor- stantial set of corpus annotations for data- pora and annotations developed in its creation, are intensive named entity recognition. The as freely-available as possible. final application and dataset is made are The remainder of this paper first discusses con- openly available, and the part-of-speech siderations specific to the language and prior tagger and NER model also operate in- work, then introduces the information extraction dependently or with the Stanford NLP pipeline, followed by an evaluation of the tools toolkit. provided. 1 Introduction 2 Processing Danish Danish is primarily spoken in the northern hemi- There are a few representational issues for Danish sphere: in Denmark, on the Faroe islands, and on that are not solved in a unified fashion across exist- Greenland. Having roots in Old Norse, Danish ing technological issues. DKIE builds upon major bears similarities to other Scandinavian languages, standards in general linguistic annotation and in and shares features with English and German. Danish to unify these solutions. Previous tools and language resources for Dan- Danish is written using the Latin alphabet, with ish have suffered from license restrictions, or from the addition of three vowels: æ, ø and a,˚ which using small or non-reusable datasets. As a result, may be transliterated as ae, oe and aa respectively. it is often difficult to use Danish language tech- It is similar to English in terms of capitalisation nologies, if anything is available at all. In cases rules and character set. where quality tools are available, they often have Over time, the orthography of Danish has disparate APIs and input/output formats, making shifted. Among other things, a spelling reform integration time-consuming and prone to error. in 1948 removed the capitalisation of nouns, and To remedy this, this paper presents an open- introduced the three vowel characters to repre- source information extraction toolkit for Danish, sent existing vowel digraphs. There were also using the established and flexible GATE text pro- spelling shifts in this reform (e.g. kjærlighed to cessing platform (Cunningham et al., 2013). To kærlighed). In addition, some towns and mu- this end, there are three main goals: nicipalities have changed the spelling of their Adaptation: The application adapts to collo- name. For example, Denmarks second-largest city quial and formal Danish. Aarhus changed its name to Arhus˚ with the 1948 Figure 1: The ANNIE-based information extraction pipeline for Danish reform, although Aalborg and Aabenraa did not. (CDT) (Buch-Kromann and Korzen, 2010), which Later, in 2011, the city reverted from Arhus˚ to built on and included previously-released corpora Aarhus. The city’s university retained the Aarhus for Danish. This 200K-token corpus is taken spelling throughout this period. from news articles and editorials, and includes The effect of these relatively recent changes is document structure, tokenisation, lemma, part-of- that there exist digitised texts using a variety of or- speech and dependency relation information. thographies not only to represent the same sound, The application demonstrated, DKIE, draws as also in English, but also the same actual word. only on open corpus resources for annotation, and A language processing toolkit for Danish must ex- the annotations over these corpora are released hibit sensitivity to these variances. openly. Further, the application is also made open- In addition, Danish has some word bound- source, with each component having similar or ary considerations. Compound nouns are com- better performance when compared with the state- mon (e.g. kvindehandboldlandsholdet˚ for “the of-the-art. women’s national handball team”), as are hyphen- ated constructions (fugle-fotografering for “bird 4 Information Extraction Pipeline photography”) which are often treated as single to- This section details each step in the DKIE kens. pipeline. A screenshot of the tool is shown in Fig- Finally, abbreviations are common in Danish, ure 1. and its acronyms can be difficult to disambiguate without the right context and language resource 4.1 Tokeniser (e.g. OB for Odense Boldklub, a football club). We adopt the PAROLE tokenisation scheme (Ke- 3 Background son and Norling-Christensen, 1998). This makes different decisions from Penn Treebank in some The state of the art in Danish information extrac- cases, concatenating particular expressions as sin- tion is not very interoperable or open compared to gle tokens. For example, the two word phrase i alt that for e.g. English. Previous work, while high- – meaning in total – is converted to the single to- performance, is not available freely (Bick, 2004), ken i alt. A set list of these group formations is or domain-restricted.1 This makes results diffi- given in the Danish PAROLE guidelines. cult to reproduce (Fokkens et al., 2013), and leads Another key difference is in the treatment of to sub-optimal interoperability (Lee et al., 2010). quoted phrases and hyphenation. Phrases con- Even recent books focusing on the topic are heav- nected in this way are often treated as single to- ily licensed and difficult for the average academic kens. For example, the phrase “Se og hør”- to access. Further, prior tools are often in the form læserne (readers of “See and Hear”, a magazine) of discrete components, hard to extend or to inte- is treated as a single token under this scheme. grate with other systems. Some good corpus resources are available, most 4.2 Part-of-Speech tagger recently the Copenhagen Dependency Treebank We use a machine-learning based tag- 1E.g. CST’s non-commercial-only anonymisation tool, at ger (Toutanova et al., 2003) for Danish part- http://cst.dk/online/navnegenkender/ of-speech labelling. The original PAROLE id expression interpretation Tagger Token accuracy % Sentence acc. % -- ---------- -------------- DKIE 95.3 49.1 3 igaa ADD(DCT,day,-1) TnT 96.2 39.1 13 Num._jul ADD(DATE_MONTH_DAY(DCT, 12, 24), day, TOKEN(0)) Table 1: Part-of-speech labelling accuracy in DKIE Figure 2: Example normalisation rules in TIMEN. “DCT” refers to the document creation time. scheme introduces a set of around 120 tags, many Secondly, entities outside of Denmark sometimes of which are used only rarely. The scheme com- have different names specific to the Danish lan- prises tags built up of up to nine features. These guage (e.g. Lissabon for Lisboa / Lisbon). features are used to describe information such As well as a standard strict-matching gazetteer, as case, degree, gender, number, possessivity, we include a “fuzzy” gazetteer specific to Dan- reflexivity, mood, tense and so on (Keson and ish that tolerates vowel orthography variation and Norling-Christensen, 1998). the other changes introduced in the 1948 spelling The PAROLE data includes morphological en- reform. For locations, we extracted data for coding in tags. We separate this data out in names of Danish towns from DBpedia and a lo- our corpus, adding morphological features distinct cal gazetteer, and from Wikipedia the Danish- from part-of-speech data. This data may then be language versions of the world’s 1 000 most popu- used by later work to train a morphological anal- lous cities. For organisations, we used Wikipedia yser, or by other tools that rely on morphological cross-language links to map the international or- information. ganisations deemed notable in Wikipedia to their We combine PAROLE annotations with the re- Danish translation and acroynm (e.g. the United duced tagset employed by the Danish Dependency Nations is referred to as FN). The major Danish Treebank (DDT) (Kromann, 2003). This has 25 political parties were also added to this gazetteer. tags. We adapted the tagger to Danish by in- For person names, we build lists of both notable cluding internal automatic mapping of æ, ø and people,2 and also populated GATE’s first and last a˚ to two-letter diphthongs when both training and name lists with common choices in Denmark. labelling, by adding extra sets of features for handling words and adjusting our unknown word 4.4 Temporal Expression Annotation threshold to compensate for the small corpus (as We include temporal annotation for Danish in this in Derczynski et al. (2013)), and by specifying the pipeline, making DKIE the first temporal anno- closed-class tags for this set and language. We tation tool for Danish. We follow the TimeML also prefer a CRF-based classifier in order to get temporal annotation standard (Pustejovsky et al., better whole-sequence accuracy, providing greater 2004), completing just the TIMEX3 part. opportunities for later-stage tools such as depen- Danish is interesting in that it permits flexible dency parsers to accurately process more of the temporal anchors outside of reference time (Re- corpus. ichenbach, 1947) and the default structure of a cal- Results are given in Table 1, comparing token- endar.
Recommended publications
  • Års Beretning 2011
    ÅRSBERETNING 2011 ÅRS BERETNING 2011 Udgiver Dansk Boldspil-Union Fodboldens Hus DBU Allé 1 2605 Brøndby Telefon 4326 2222 Telefax 4326 2245 e-mail [email protected] www.dbu.dk Redaktion DBU Kommunikation Lars Berendt (ansvarshavende) Jacob Wadland Pia Schou Nielsen Mikkel Minor Petersen Layout/dtp DBU Grafisk Bettina Emcken Lise Fabricius Carl Herup Høgnesen Fotos Anders & Per Kjærbye/Fodboldbilleder.dk m.fl. Redaktion slut 16. februar 2012 Tryk og distribution Kailow Graphic Oplag 2.500 Pris Kr. 60,00 plus kr. 31,00 i forsendelse 320752_Omslag_2011.indd 1 14/02/12 15.10 ÅRSBERETNING 2011 ÅRS BERETNING 2011 Udgiver Dansk Boldspil-Union Fodboldens Hus DBU Allé 1 2605 Brøndby Telefon 4326 2222 Telefax 4326 2245 e-mail [email protected] www.dbu.dk Redaktion DBU Kommunikation Lars Berendt (ansvarshavende) Jacob Wadland Pia Schou Nielsen Mikkel Minor Petersen Layout/dtp DBU Grafisk Bettina Emcken Lise Fabricius Carl Herup Høgnesen Fotos Anders & Per Kjærbye/Fodboldbilleder.dk m.fl. Redaktion slut 16. februar 2012 Tryk og distribution Kailow Graphic Oplag 2.500 Pris Kr. 60,00 plus kr. 31,00 i forsendelse 320752_Omslag_2011.indd 1 14/02/12 15.10 Dansk Boldspil-Union Årsberetning 2011 Indhold Dansk Boldspil-Union U20-landsholdet . 56 Dansk Boldspil-Union 2011 . 4 U19-landsholdet . 57 UEFA U21 EM 2011 Danmark . 8 U18-landsholdet . 58 Nationale relationer . 10 U17-landsholdet . 60 Internationale relationer . 12 U16-landsholdet . 62 Medlemstal . 14 Old Boys-landsholdet . 63 Organisationsplan 2011 . 16 Kvindelandsholdet . 64 Administrationen . 18 U23-kvindelandsholdet . 66 Bestyrelsen og forretningsudvalget . 19 U19-kvindelandsholdet . 67 Udvalg . 20 U17-pigelandsholdet . 68 Repræsentantskabet . 22 U16-pigelandsholdet .
    [Show full text]
  • Værdiansættelse Af Brøndby If
    INFORMATION Dato: 06‐05‐2020 Anslag ekskl. forside, referencer, bilag figur & tabelliste: 123.078. Antal normalsider: 54. Vejleder: Jesper Storm. Simon Ersgaard Studie nr.: S108781 Afgangsprojekt HD(R) VÆRDIANSÆTTELSE AF BRØNDBY IF Strategisk‐ og regnskabsanalyse af Brøndby IF Simon Ersgaard HD(R) 06‐05‐2020 Afgangsprojekt Indholdsfortegnelse 1. Indledning ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Problemfelt ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Problemformulering ........................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Afgrænsning ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Metode og fremgangsmåde .................................................................................................... 7 1.4.1 Projektet ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.2 Empiri/Metodevalg – Teori og modeller ........................................................................... 7 1.4.3 Fremgangsmåden ............................................................................................................. 9 1.4.3 Kilder ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2020 Central Business Registration No
    Orifarm Group A/S Energivej 15 5260 Odense S Denmark ÆR NEM KET VA Phone +45 63 95 27 00 S Annual Review 2020 Central Business Registration no. 27347282 www.orifarm.com Tryksag 5041 0826 Scandinavian Print Group CONTENTS Letter from the CEO 03 An incredible year The business 04 Orifarm in brief 06 Our business 12 2020 highlights The foundation 14 25th anniversary 15 Ambitious ownership 16 Who we are 18 New ways of working 20 Supporting talents outside Orifarm 21 Donations and charity 22 Integrating sustainability 24 A game-changing acquisition 28 Room for growth Executive Management 30 Orifarm’s Executive Management 32 More bright years ahead of us Company details and key figures 33 Company details 34 Key figures Annual Review 2020 1 Letter from the CEO An incredible year 2020 is a year we will never forget. Whether we • In August, Hans Bøgh-Sørensen took over as focus on the COVID-19 pandemic and its conse- Chairman of the Board of Directors quences worldwide, on Orifarm and our business primarily in Europe, or on each and every one of • In April, Orifarm signed and announced the big- us as individuals, we learned during the year that gest acquisition in the history of the company. things we took for granted when entering 2020 An acquisition from Takeda including more than were suddenly changed or simply not possible 100 products, two production facilities and more anymore. than 600 employees. This acquisition is a major milestone and will be a true game changer for 2020 will always be linked to the COVID-19 virus, Orifarm going forward and it is impossible to do a 2020 review without touching upon the pandemic and its many unfor- We also expect 2021 to be a bright year for Ori- tunate consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Merlin's Danish Faxe Kondi Ligaen 2000
    www.soccercardindex.com Merlin’s Danish Faxe Kondi Ligaen 2000 checklist AB Akademisk Boldklub FC København Silkeborg INSERTS □1 Jan Bjur □46 Donatas Vencevicius □89 Morten Bruun □2 Nicolai Stokholm □47 Niclas Jensen □90 Lars Brøgger Klub Logo (Club Logos) □ □3 Jan Hoffmann □48 Todi Jónsson □91 Nocko Jokovic A1 AB Akademisk Boldklub □ □4 Lars Bo Larsen □49 Christian Lønstrup □92 Peter Kjær A2 AGF Aarhus □ □5 Jan Michaelsen □50 Kim Madsen □93 Thomas Røll Larsen A3 Brøndby □ □6 Alex Nielsen □51 Michael ‘Mio’ Nielsen □94 Peter Lassen A4 Esbjerg □ □7 Brian Steen Nielsen □52 David Nielsen □95 Henrik ‘Tømrer’ Pedersen A5 FC København □ □8 Allan Olsen □53 Thomas Rytter □96 Thomas Poulsen A6 Herfølge □ □9 Peter Rasmussen □54 Michael Stensgaard □97 Peter Sørensen A7 Lyngby □ □10 Peter Frank □55 Bo Svensson □98 Bora Zivkovic A8 OB Odense Boldklub □ □11 Abdul Sule □56 Thomas Thorninger A9 Silkeborg Vejle □A10 Vejle AGF Aarhus Herfølge □99 Erik Boye □A11 Viborg □12 Anders Bjerre □57 Thomas Høyer □100 Jens Madsen □A12 AAB Aalborg □13 Kenneth Christiansen □58 Lars Jakobsen □101 Kaspar Dalgas □14 Mads Jørgensen □59 John ‘Faxe’ Jensen □102 Calle Facius Faxe Kondi Superstars (Superstars) □15 Ken Martin □60 Kenneth Jensen □103 Jerry Brown □B1 Brian Steen Nielsen □16 Johnny Mølby □61 Kenneth Kastrup □104 Jesper Mikkelsen □B2 Peter Madsen □17 Bo Nielsen □62 Jesper Falck □105 Henrik Risom □B3 Kenneth Jensen □18 Michael Nonbo □63 Steven Lustü □106 Kent Scholz □B4 Søren Andersen □19 Mads Rieper □64 Henrik Lykke □107 Jesper Ljung □B5 Peter Lassen □20 Kenny Thorup
    [Show full text]
  • 306189 Merged
    Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to understand the concept of brand image in the context of the best tournament of professional football in Denmark - Alka Superliga. Kotler (2001) states that brand image can be defined as: “The set of beliefs, ideas and impressions that a person holds regarding an object” (p. 273), and this view have led to an examination of the image of the Alka Superliga. However, during our research in the theoretical framework of a brand image, we learned that the statement by Kotler (2001) needed to be unfolded further to incorporate a two-sided aspect of the concept. We argue that one side of the notion is to reveal the desired image of the brand through Divisionsforeningen’ set of beliefs, ideas and impressions expressed in their positioning and the associations they want to connect with the brand. Simultaneously, we discover the brand from the perspective of the perceived set of beliefs, ideas and impression reflected in the associations held by the consumers. This emphasize that the definition of the brand image of Alka Superliga is to be interpreted from a perspective related to the Divisionsforeningen and a perspective related to the consumers. In order for define the brand image of Alka Superliga we divide the thesis in two parts: One part focusing on the perspective of Divisionsforeningen conceptualized as Desired Brand Image and another focusing on the perspective of consumers conceptualized as Perceived Brand Image. Dividing the thesis in terms of the desired and the perceived brand image implied that the empiricism of the thesis should treat both perspectives emphasizing that different Qualitative and Quantitative empirical collection techniQues is applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 14Th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
    EACL 2014 Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics April 26-30, 2014 Gothenburg, Sweden GOLD SPONSORS SILVER SPONSOR BRONZE SPONSORS MASTER'S PROGRAMME IN LANGUAGE SUPPORTERS TECHNOLOGY EXHIBITORS OTHER SPONSORS HOSTS c 2014 The Association for Computational Linguistics ii Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-937284-75-6 iii Preface: General Chair Dear readers, Welcome to EACL 2014, the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics! This is the largest EACL meeting ever: with eighty long papers, almost fifty short ones, thirteen student research papers, twenty-six demos, fourteen workshops and six tutorials, we expect to bring to Gothenburg up to five hundred participants, for a week of excellent science interspersed with entertaining social events. It is hard to imagine how much work is involved in the preparation of such an event. It takes about three years, from the day the EACL board starts discussing the location and nominating the chairs, until the final details of the budget are resolved. The number of people involved is also huge, and I was fortunate to work with an excellent, dedicated and efficient team, to which I am enormously grateful. The scientific program was very ably composed by the Program Committee Chairs, Sharon Goldwater and Stefan Riezler, presiding over a team of twenty-four area chairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Medlemstal 2018
    DBU Fyn - Medlemstal 2018 0-12 år 13-18 år 19-24 år 25-59 år 60+ år I alt Kommunenavn Foreningsnavn Damer Herrer Damer Herrer Damer Herrer Damer Herrer Damer Herrer Assens Assens Fodbold Club 9 92 7 98 1 51 0 69 0 19 346 Brahesholm Boldklub 1 5 0 0 0 10 0 22 0 0 38 Brylle Boldklub 10 31 26 2 1 26 0 40 0 5 141 Ebberup Idrætsforening 14 55 6 7 1 1 12 16 0 0 112 Flemløse Boldklub 4 34 25 5 20 16 13 30 0 0 147 Frøbjerg Gymnastikforening 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 16 Glamsbjerg Idrætsforening 15 73 33 60 3 35 1 33 0 11 264 Haarby Boldklub 19 70 1 43 0 21 2 42 0 7 205 Haarby Efterskole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jordløse Boldklub 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 Kerte Gymnastikforening 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 11 0 0 25 Skalbjerg Boldklub 11 35 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Skallebølle Sportsklub 6 13 7 18 2 1 5 24 0 0 76 STIF 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Tommerup Boldklub 2 114 5 73 0 21 1 26 0 3 245 Verninge Idrætsforening 12 53 10 12 1 21 8 37 0 0 154 Vissenbjerg Gymnastik- & Idrætsforening, Fodbold 13 75 15 41 0 30 0 76 0 8 258 Aarup Boldklub 16 89 43 75 11 34 2 107 0 5 382 Faaborg-Midtfyn Allested Ungdoms & Idrætsforening 27 45 10 0 12 14 1 31 0 11 151 Bøgebjerg Idrætsforening 6 15 0 0 0 14 1 13 0 0 49 Falsled/Svanninge Skytte-, Gymnastik- og Idrætsforening 20 42 24 30 7 8 4 41 0 0 176 FC Broby 18 11 11 34 7 40 10 53 0 9 193 Faaborg Boldklub & Idrætsforening, Fodbold 11 100 28 102 15 62 0 35 0 0 353 Faaborg Boldklub og Idrætsforening - Old Boys Fodbold 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 8 53 Gislev Idrætsforening 15 24 8 26 0 0 0 19 0 10 102 Hillerslev Idrætsforening 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 28 Horne Forenede Sportsklubber 28 47 3 17 1 8 1 56 0 2 163 Korinth Idrætsforening 20 21 14 13 0 17 0 23 0 2 110 Krarup/Espe SG&I, Fodbold 38 41 4 50 0 7 0 37 0 0 177 Kværndrup Boldklub 10 56 16 15 11 27 4 28 0 14 181 Faaborg-Midtfyn Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 S Oc Cer Media Almana C
    2015 SOCCER MEDIA ALMANAC 2015 SOUTHERN MISS SOCCER www.southernmiss.com Quick Facts General 2013 Team Information TABLE OF CONTENTS School: _________________University of Southern Mississippi Overall Record _______________________________ 7-9-4 The University ______________________________ 2-3 City: ____________________________ Hattiesburg, Miss. Home / Away / Neutral _____________ 5-4-1 / 1-5-2 / 1-0-1 Excellence in Education ________________________ 4-5 Founded: __________________________________ 1910 Conference USA Record ________________________ 1-7-2 Campus Life _______________________________ 6-7 Enrollment: ________________________________16,506 Home / Away ________________________ 1-3-1 / 0-4-1 Academic Success _____________________________8 Nickname: ___________________________ Golden Eagles Conference USA Finish ___________________ 8th (West) / 8 Southern Miss Soccer Complex ____________________9 Colors: ______________________________Black and Gold Starters Returning/Lost __________________________8 / 4 Strength and Conditioning _______________________10 Stadium (Capacity): ____ Southern Miss Soccer Complex (1,500) Letterwinners Returning/Lost ____________________13 / 13 Athletic Training _____________________________11 Surface: _____________________________ Natural Grass Newcomers __________________________________ 13 Affiliation: __________________________ NCAA Division I University Administration Conference: _________________________Conference USA Social Media President Dr. Rodney D. Bennett __________________12 President:
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Antepost Coupon 2019/20 30/11/2019 09:41 1 / 7
    Issued Date Page EUROPE ANTEPOST COUPON 2019/20 30/11/2019 09:41 1 / 7 Spain Primera Division 2019/20 France Ligue 1 2019/20 Belgium First Division A 2019/20 Italy Serie A 2019/20 Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner FC Barcelona 1.45 Paris Saint-Germain 1.01 Club Brugge 1.45 Juventus Turin 1.35 Real Madrid 2.95 Olympique Marseille 47.0 Standard Liege 6.80 Inter Milano 3.20 Atletico Madrid 22.0 Olympique Lyonnais 66.0 KAA Gent 7.80 SS Lazio Roma 42.0 FC Sevilla 45.0 AS Monaco 120 Royal Antwerp FC 12.3 SSC Napoli 47.0 Real Sociedad 185 AS Saint-Etienne 220 KRC Genk 21.0 Atalanta Bergamasca Calcio 54.0 Athletic Bilbao 250 Lille Losc 240 RSC Anderlecht 22.0 AS Roma 72.0 Portugal Primera Liga 2019/20 Turkey Super Lig 2019/20 Greece Super League 2019/20 Cyprus 1st Division 2019/20 Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner Benfica Lisbon 1.60 Galatasaray 2.60 Olympiacos FC 1.75 Apoel Nicosia FC 1.45 FC Porto 2.20 Fenerbahce 2.75 PAOK FC 2.05 Anorthosis Famagusta FC 4.00 Sporting CP 25.0 Besiktas 3.95 AEK Athens FC 44.0 AC Omonia Nicosia 7.00 FC Famalicao 44.0 Basaksehir FK 11.0 Panathinaikos Athens 390 Apollon Limassol FC 9.00 Sporting Braga 310 Trabzonspor 12.3 Aris Thessaloniki FC 700 AEK Larnaca FC 21.0 Boavista FC 720 Alanyaspor 21.0 Atromitos Athens 700 AEL Limassol FC 81.0 Holland Eredivisie 2019/20 Germany Bundesliga 2019/20 Russia Premier Liga 2019/20 Switzerland Super League 2019/20 Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner Runners Winner Ajax Amsterdam 1.04 FC Bayern Munich 1.22 FC Zenit St Petersburg 1.25 BSC Young Boys 1.60 PSV Eindhoven 9.00 RB Leipzig 9.30 FC Lokomotiv Moscow 8.00 FC Basel 1893 2.40 AZ Alkmaar 11.3 Borussia Dortmund 11.3 FC Krasnodar 8.30 FC St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silent Side of Sponsorship: an Explorative Study of Relational Determinants for Shared Value Creation
    The Silent Side of Sponsorship: An Explorative Study of Relational Determinants for Shared Value Creation Author: Nicolai Guldager Agernem (Student ID: 93291) Supervisor: James Menszies Copenhagen Business School Master’s Thesis Study Programme: Master of Arts (MA) in International Business Communication: Multicultural Communication in Organizations Date: 15 May 2019 Number of Pages | Number of Characters 79.89 |181,767 (including spaces and footnotes) Nicolai Guldager Agernem International Business Communication Master’s Thesis Copenhagen Business School Executive Summary Sponsorships have evolved from philanthropic to strategic and from exposure to meaning, where brand opportunities eclipse traditional advertising through the unique interaction with sports consumers. Sponsorship revenue is vital for the financial health of Danish football clubs. Sports properties commonly offer sponsors exposure, brand association, hospitality, and networking opportunities. However, the three latter elements are labour intensive, which leaves exposure as the main incentive for sponsoring. However, the Danish sponsorship market is fiercely competitive, which makes it cutthroat business to sustain a competitive advantage. FC Copenhagen and Brøndby IF, who have the largest following and offer the highest levels of exposure for sponsors, dominate the Danish sponsorship market. When competing on exposure is a zero-sum game, the question, then, is how do you achieve a competitive advantage in the Danish sponsorship market? Sponsorship literature is fixated on sponsor-sponsee dyads and exploring how sponsors can increase sponsorship effectiveness. This has created a discourse of the sports property being an exploitative marketing platform. This paper explores how sports properties can leverage its brand to attract more and better sponsors by examining relational determinants and the role of value alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Fodboldagenters Honorar I Kalenderåret 2020
    Fodboldagenters honorar i kalenderåret 2020 I kalenderåret 2020, har fodboldagenter fået følgende beløb udbetalt fra henholdsvis spillere (samlet beløb) og de enkelte klubber i Danmark. Alle beløb er angivet inklusive moms. Spillere samlet 16.705.742 kroner Klubber AC Horsens 373.763 kroner AGF 3.513.020 kroner Brøndby IF 2.050.522 kroner Esbjerg fB 673.725 kroner FC Fredericia 57.500 kroner FC Helsingør 50.813 kroner FC København 26.748.002 kroner FC Midtjylland 5.508.464 kroner FC Nordsjælland 266.131 kroner Fremad Amager 27.375 kroner Fortuna Hjørring 16.700 kroner Hobro IK 106.500 kroner Kolding IF 78.125 kroner Lyngby BK 673.560 kroner Næstved BK 46.238 kroner Odense BK 1.113.958 kroner Randers FC 1.213.250 kroner Silkeborg IF 688.867 kroner SønderjyskE 1.225.852 kroner Vejle BK 226.875 kroner Vendsyssel FF 508.694 kroner Viborg FF 198.299 kroner AaB 5.159.112 kroner Klubber samlet 50.525.345 kroner I alt 67.231.087 kroner Ovenstående beløb fordeler sig på nedenstående spillerkontrakter, transferaftaler og lejeaftaler, hvor spillere og/eller klubber er blevet repræsenteret af en fodboldagent registreret hos DBU: Klub Spiller Fodboldagent Repræsenterede Transaktionstype AB Christian Enemark Jannick Haslund Spiller Kontraktindgåelse AB Rasmus Grosen Martin Schiær Spiller Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Lirim Qamili Ashan M. Fazal Dobbeltrepræsentation Transferaftale AC Horsens Jacob Buus Bjarne Goldbæk Dobbeltrepræsentation Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Magnus Jensen Christian Bysted Klub Transferaftale AC Horsens Peter Therkildsen Jesper Buch Rasmussen Dobbeltrepræsentation Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Jannick Pohl Jesper Ørskov Spiller Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Michael Lansing John Sivebæk Spiller Kontraktforlængelse AC Horsens Malte Kiilerich Kim Wacker Spiller Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Louka Prip Andersen Kim Wacker Spiller Transferaftale AC Horsens Matej Delac Mads Staberg Spiller Kontraktindgåelse AC Horsens Bjarke Jacobsen Marc Nygaard Spiller Kontraktforlængelse AC Horsens Thor S.
    [Show full text]
  • Football Sponsorships
    FOOTBALL SPONSORSHIPS Master in Marketing Frederik Bastian Schoop Football Sponsorship Market: Danish perspective. Supervisor: Daniela Langaro ISCTE Business School, Phd Departamento de Marketing, Operações e Gestão Geral September 2016 Acknowledgements I want to thank Amanda for her unconditional support. Furthermore, I appreciate the support given from family and friends, and especially I want to thank Daniela Langaro, and all who took time for interviews and surveys, I couldn’t have done it without you! i ii Abstract The purpose of this project was to investigate and analyse the Danish football sponsorship market. In doing so, existing theory was explored regarding motives associated to sponsorship in sports, criteria for sponsorship evaluation and measurement and the influence of fans regarding sponsorships. In the following phase, data were collected among sponsors, football clubs and football related external companies. The findings were analysed in order to examine how the Danish football sponsorship market relates to the explored theory. Envisioning to obtain a solid data collection, in-depth interviews were conducted with 7 persons from 6 football clubs and with 2 football related external companies and an online survey was sent to 39 companies located in Denmark (27 valid responses were obtained). The results obtained support the literature in various aspects, However, some important discrepancy is identified concerning two topics, namely: Sponsorships motives, where football clubs and football related external companies describe the importance of networking with other companies, as a key motive for driving sponsorship decisions and the limited evaluation and measurement approaches used in sponsorships, with individuals´ gut feeling being the method most commonly adopted to evaluate results.
    [Show full text]