Proguanil Versus Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Pregnancy: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proguanil Versus Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Pregnancy: a Randomised Controlled Trial Clin l of ica Kasso et al., J Clin Trials 2012, 2:4 a l T n r r i u a DOI: 10.4172/2167-0870.1000122 l o s J Journal of Clinical Trials ISSN: 2167-0870 Research Article Open Access Proguanil versus Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Trial Terhemen Kasso1, Israel Jeremiah2* and Celestine T John1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Niger Delta University, Amassoma, Nigeria Abstract Background: Malaria is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in sub Saharan Africa. Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) with Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP) has been proven efficacious in reducing the burden of malaria in pregnancy. However its use is contraindicated in some individuals and malaria resistance to SP has been reported. Therefore there is a need to seek for effective alternatives. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of proguanil versus SP for malaria chemoprophylaxis in pregnancy. Methodology: This was a randomised controlled trial of women attending antenatal clinic at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria from January 2010 to September 2010. Three hundred and fifty participants were recruited at booking, randomized into two groups using a table of random numbers and monitored till delivery. One group received daily proguanil while the other received SP for malaria prophylaxis. Blood samples were taken for their haematocrit and malaria parasites at booking and delivery. The results were compared. Data management was with SPSS 15 for Windows® statistical soft ware. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The prevalence of maternal malaria parasitaemia in this study was 29.9% at booking and 12.5% at delivery. The prevalence at delivery in women given SP and proguanil was 10.6% and 14.4% respectively. This was not statistically significant (P=0.429). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of preterm delivery (P=0.262), cord blood parasitaemia (P=0.385), low birth weight (P=0.175) and birth asphyxia (P=0.367) between the two study groups. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine and the use of daily proguanil so larger studies with proguanil are warranted. Keywords: Malaria; Chemoprophylaxis; Pregnancy; Proguanil; Control of malaria during pregnancy depends on both preventing Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP) infection and clearing parasitaemia when it occurs [1]. This is because most women in areas of stable malaria transmission may not Introduction experience serious clinical illness. The WHO therefore recommends The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates annually the the use of Insecticide-Treated Bed Nets (ITNs), Intermittent global incidence of malaria to be about 300 million cases. Malaria Preventive Treatment In Pregnancy (IPTp) and effective case is also estimated to kill between 1.1 to 2.7 million people worldwide management and treatment of malaria as interventions to prevent each year [1,2]. More than 90% of these deaths are from sub-Saharan this disease in pregnancy [9,10]. Intermittent preventive treatment Africa [1-3]. Over 50 million women are exposed to the risk of malaria with Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP-IPT) had proven efficacious every year. Pregnant women are more susceptible to malaria than non in reducing the burden of malaria in pregnancy [11]. It is currently pregnant ones and this susceptibility is greatest in first and second the recommended regimen for prevention of malaria in pregnancy in pregnancies. Pregnancy complicated by malaria infection results in endemic areas. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine has been shown to be the substantial maternal, fetal and infant morbidity and mortality, causing most effective single dose anti-malarial drug for prevention of malaria 75,000-200,000 infant deaths every year [4,5]. Successful control of during pregnancy in areas where the strain of plasmodium remains malaria in pregnancy might therefore prevent these deaths. sensitive to it [12]. Current scientific evidence suggests that at least two doses of IPT are required to achieve optimal benefit in most women. In all malarious areas, infection by any of the plasmodium species The effectiveness of this drug is recently being threatened by during pregnancy is detrimental to the mother and the fetus. The most increasing levels of resistance to SP across Africa [13] and South East deleterious effects on the mother are caused by plasmodium falciparum Asia [14]. There is therefore need to develop alternative drug regimens [6]. Millions of pregnant women are exposed to malaria and thousands die every year as a result of direct or indirect consequence [6]. Both plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax can cause *Corresponding author: Israel Jeremiah, Department of Obstetrics and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including maternal anaemia and low birth Gynaecology, Niger Delta University, Amassoma, Nigeria, Tel: +23-4803-5009- weight due to preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction [7]. 8348; E-mail: [email protected] Malaria causes and worsens anaemia in pregnancy, increased uterine Received April 22, 2012; Accepted August 27, 2012; Published August 31, 2012 activity, abortions and preterm labour [2]. Its effect on the fetus can Citation: Kasso T, Jeremiah I, John CT (2012) Proguanil versus Sulphadoxine- lead to abortions, IUGR (Intrauterine growth restriction), LBW (Low Pyrimethamine for Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Pregnancy: A Randomised Birth Weight), severe birth asphyxia, congenital/neonatal malaria, Controlled Trial. J Clin Trials 2:122. doi:10.4172/2167-0870.1000122 hypoglycaemia and intrauterine fetal death. Cord blood parasitaemia Copyright: © 2012 Kasso T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under may be present where placental malaria has been active at the time of the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and delivery [8]. source are credited. J Clin Trials Volume 2 • Issue 4 • 1000122 ISSN: 2167-0870 JCTR, an open access journal Citation: Kasso T, Jeremiah I, John CT (2012) Proguanil versus Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Pregnancy: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Clin Trials 2:122. doi:10.4172/2167-0870.1000122 Page 2 of 6 for IPT in pregnancy. Proguanil is considered as one of the safest anti- 2(1.96)2 x 0.24 ()1 – 0.24 ′= × malarials currently available [15-17] and has been used extensively n 2 1 4 0 for malaria chemoprophylaxis in pregnant women. Proguanil is well 0.10 tolerated and effective in all trimesters of pregnancy [16]. However, the Thus 140 experimental subjects and another 140 control subjects daily dosing of proguanil raises the problem of client compliance. were required for the study. This gave a total of 280 subjects which was rounded up to 300. However, 350 clients were recruited for the study Resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is increasing, but with each arm having 175 subjects. This over sampling was deliberate evidence-based alternatives for IPTp have not yet been determined. In for drop out and loss to follow up. An average of 170 women booked women with contraindications to SP, proguanil is widely used as an for antenatal care per week at UPTH. The desired number of women alternative. Proguanil had been shown in earlier studies to be an effective was recruited within six weeks and they were followed up till delivery. chemoprophylactic drug for malaria during pregnancy when used either singly or in combination with other anti-malarials [16,18,19]. Methods However, there is no study on its effectiveness as an alternative to SP Three hundred and fifty participants were recruited by random in our environment despite its wide use in our practice. This study selection at their booking visit after obtaining an informed consent therefore sought to compare the effectiveness of these two drugs (SP from them. They were then randomized into two groups using a table and Proguanil) when used for malaria chemoprophylaxis in pregnancy. of random numbers. They picked from concealed numbers which Patients and Methods were randomly allocated to contain sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (Malareich™, Medreich Plc, England) or proguanil (PaludrineTM, Study site and ethical issues AstraZeneca UK Ltd). The numbers were taken to the pharmacy where the drugs were stored and dispensed to them. One group was given This study took place in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department intermittent preventive treatment for malaria chemoprophylaxis with of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital in Rivers state two doses of SP while the other group received daily proguanil. Two from January 2010 to September 2010. The University of Port Harcourt doses of SP were given as DOT (Directly Observed Treatment) after Teaching Hospital is a tertiary health institution located in the outskirts quickening, four weeks apart. This was done under the supervision of of Port Harcourt. Port Harcourt is a metropolitan city located in the nurses at the antenatal clinic and recorded in the patients’ antenatal heart of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The topography is that of flat case notes. Each dose consisted of three tablets of SP containing 500 mg plains with a network of rivers, tributaries and creeks which have a high of sulphadoxine and 25 mg of pyrimethamine per tablet (Malareich™). potential for breeding of mosquitoes. Malaria transmission is intense The other group received chemoprophylaxis with 100 mg of proguanil year round with a peak during the rainy season months of March to (PaludrineTM) daily. The first dose was also given as DOT in order November and a nadir during the dry season months of December to to avoid bias. Those who were taking daily proguanil were told to February. always take the drug alongside their daily haematinics and bring the The University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Institutional packs to the clinic in their next visit.
Recommended publications
  • Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Folic Acid Antagonists: Antimicrobial and Immunomodulating Mechanisms and Applications Daniel Fernández-Villa 1, Maria Rosa Aguilar 1,2 and Luis Rojo 1,2,* 1 Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Polímeros, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, 28006 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (D.F.-V.); [email protected] (M.R.A.) 2 Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, 28029 Madrid, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-915-622-900 Received: 18 September 2019; Accepted: 7 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Abstract: Bacterial, protozoan and other microbial infections share an accelerated metabolic rate. In order to ensure a proper functioning of cell replication and proteins and nucleic acids synthesis processes, folate metabolism rate is also increased in these cases. For this reason, folic acid antagonists have been used since their discovery to treat different kinds of microbial infections, taking advantage of this metabolic difference when compared with human cells. However, resistances to these compounds have emerged since then and only combined therapies are currently used in clinic. In addition, some of these compounds have been found to have an immunomodulatory behavior that allows clinicians using them as anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an updated state-of-the-art on the use of antifolates as antibacterial and immunomodulating agents in the clinical setting, as well as to present their action mechanisms and currently investigated biomedical applications. Keywords: folic acid antagonists; antifolates; antibiotics; antibacterials; immunomodulation; sulfonamides; antimalarial 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Atovaquone/Proguanil Hydrochloride 250 Mg/100 Mg Film-Coated Tablets Atovaquone/Proguanil Hydrochloride
    Package Leaflet: Information for the patient Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride 250 mg/100 mg film-coated tablets atovaquone/proguanil hydrochloride Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine because it contains important information for you. - Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. - If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist. - This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. - If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor or pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet: 1. What Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride 3. How to take Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. What Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride is and what it is used for Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride belongs to a group of medicines called antimalarials. It contains two active substances, atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride. Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride is used to: • Prevent malaria • Treat malaria Malaria is spread by the bite of an infected mosquito, which passes the malaria parasite (Plasmodium falciparum) into the bloodstream. Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride prevents malaria by killing this parasite. For people who are already infected with malaria, Atovaquone/Proguanil hydrochloride also kills these parasites. Protecting yourself from catching malaria People of any age can get malaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrimethamine and Proguanil Are the Two Most Widely Used DHFR Inhibitor Antimalarial Drugs. Cycloguanil Is the Active Metabolite of the Proguanil (1,2)
    Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol., 49, 1-14, 1996. IN VITRO SELECTION OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM LINES RESISTANT TO DIHYDROFOLATE-REDUCTASE INHIBITORS AND CROSS RESISTANCE STUDIES Virendra K. BHASIN* and Lathika NAIR Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India (Received July 27, 1995. Accepted November 6, 1995) SUMMARY: A cloned Plasmodium falciparum line was subjected to in vitro drug pressure, by employing a relapse protocol, to select progressively resistant falciparum lines to pyrimethamine and cycloguanil, the two dihydrofolate- reductase (DHFR) inhibitor antimalarial drugs. The falciparum lines resistant to pyrimethamine were selected much faster than those resistant to cycloguanil. In 348 days of selection/cultivation, there was 2,400-fold increase in IC50 value to pyrimethamine, whereas only about 75-fold decrease in sensitivity to cycloguanil was registered in 351 days. Pyrimethamine-resistant parasites acquired a degree of cross resistance to cycloguanil and methotrexate, another DHFR inhibitor, but did not show any cross resistance to some other groups of antimalarial drugs. The highly pyrimethamine-resistant line was not predisposed for faster selection to cycloguanil resistance. Resistance acquired to pyrimethamine was stable. The series of resistant lines obtained form a good material to study the •eevolution•f of resistance more meaningfully at molecular level. INTRODUCTION Pyrimethamine and proguanil are the two most widely used DHFR inhibitor antimalarial drugs. Cycloguanil is the active metabolite of the proguanil (1,2). There is abundant evidence to indicate that the pyrimethamine resistance is now widely distributed throughout malaria-endemic areas of the world (3-5). The incidence of the proguanil resistance appears to be in doubt and *To whom correspondence should be addressed .
    [Show full text]
  • Front-Line Glioblastoma Chemotherapeutic Temozolomide Is Toxic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository 1 Front-line glioblastoma chemotherapeutic temozolomide is toxic 2 to Trypanosoma brucei and potently enhances melarsoprol and 3 eflornithine 4 5 Dietmar Steverding *, Stuart A. Rushworth 6 7 Bob Champion Research & Education Building, Norwich Medical School, University of East 8 Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK 9 10 11 12 __________ 13 * Tel: +44-1603-591291; fax: +44-1603-591750. 14 E-mail address: [email protected] 15 1 16 A B S T R A C T 17 18 Sleeping sickness is an infectious disease that is caused by the protozoan parasite 19 Trypanosoma brucei. The second stage of the disease is characterised by the parasites 20 entering the brain. It is therefore important that sleeping sickness therapies are able to cross 21 the blood-brain barrier. At present, only three medications for chemotherapy of the second 22 stage of the disease are available. As these trypanocides have serious side effects and are 23 difficult to administer, new and safe anti-trypanosomal brain-penetrating drugs are needed. 24 For these reasons, the anti-glioblastoma drug temozolomide was tested in vitro for activity 25 against bloodstream forms of T. brucei. The concentration of the drug required to reduce the 26 growth rate of the parasites by 50% was 29.1 μM and to kill all trypanosomes was 125 μM. 27 Importantly, temozolomide did not affect the growth of human HL-60 cells up to a 28 concentration of 300 μM.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 1/44
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 DDD/1000/ ATC code ATC group / INN (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 146,8152 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0760 A01AB09 Miconazole(O) 7139,2 g 0,2 g 0,0760 A01AB12 Hexetidine(O) 1541120 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+Benzocaine(C) 23900 pieces A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+Thymol(dental) 2639 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+Cetylpyridinium chloride(gingival) 179340 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+Cetrimide(O) 23565 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate(O) 824240 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+Chamomille extract(O) 317140 g A01AD86 Lidocaine+Eugenol(gingival) 1128 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 35,6598 A02A ANTACIDS 0,9596 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 0,9596 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 591680 pieces 10 pieces 0,1261 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 1998558 ml 50 ml 0,0852 A02AD82 Aluminium aminoacetate+Magnesium oxide(O) 463540 pieces 10 pieces 0,0988 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+Magnesium carbonate(O) 3049560 pieces 10 pieces 0,6497 A02AF Antacids with antiflatulents Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium A02AF80 1000790 ml hydroxide+Simeticone(O) DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 34,7001 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 3,5364 A02BA02 Ranitidine(O) 494352,3 g 0,3 g 3,5106 A02BA02 Ranitidine(P)
    [Show full text]
  • Pan American Health Organization ADVISORY COMMITTEE on MEDICAL RESEARCH Sixth Meeting Washington, Doco, 12-16 June 1967 Item
    Pan American Health Organization ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL RESEARCH Sixth Meeting Washington, DoCo, 12-16 June 1967 Item 5.2 of the Agenda STUDIES ON THE RESPONSE TO DRUGS OF BLOOD-INDUCED FALCIPARUM MALARIA: SOUTH AMERICAN PARASITE STRAINS Ref: RES 6/2 14 April 1967 PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION Pan American Sanitary Bureau, Regional Office of the WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Washington, D.C. STUDIES CN THE RESPONSE TO DLRUGS OF BLOOD-INDUCED FALCI- PARUM MALARIA. SOUTH ATERICAN PARASITE STRAINS Final Report of the Ribeirao Preto Screening Center Sao Paulo, Brazil by A.J. Walker --y and . -Y -1 F.J. López-Antuñano A-> - --la PREFACE A preliminary report on the work of the Ribeirao Preto Center was prepared in May 1965, covering the period January 1963 to March 1965 (AMRO Project 0212). The report, hurriedly assembled -7. from a complex mass of data, failed to give the complete picture. In March 1967, the Pan American Health Organization requested the authors to re- examine with more deliberation the material and its implications. This report, prepared with the help of Dr. John W. Field, STC/WHO, is the result. -I rt. CONTENTS -I Iritroduction II Origin of strains III Methods and standards IV Sensitivity of strains to drugs A) Chloroquine B) Pyrimethamine C) Combined pyrimethanine - sulphonamides D) Quinine *1- V Toxicity of drugs VI Summary and conclusions VII Acknowledgements Appendices A) History of donors B) Sequence of passage C) Pre-patent periods in relation to the number , -. of parasites in the inoculum. D) A note of microscopic diagnosis -. ;i E) Organization and staff -Jo _-.s- RESPONSE TO DRUGS IN BLOOD-INDUCED FALCIPARUM MALARIA: -$ SOUTH AMERICAN PARASITE STRAINS - I INTRODUCTION The history of malaria chemotherapy over the second quarter of the present century is one of sustained progress in the synthesis of active remedies.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States 1 (Based on Drugs Currently Available for Use in the United States — October 1, 2019)
    Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States 1 (Based on drugs currently available for use in the United States — October 1, 2019) CDC Malaria Hotline: (770) 488-7788 or (855) 856-4713 (toll free) Monday–Friday, 9 am to 5 pm EST; (770) 488-7100 after hours, weekends, and holidays Clinical Diagnosis/ Drug Susceptibility (Based on Recommended Regimen and Adult Dose1 Recommended Regimen and Pediatric Dose1 Plasmodium Species Region Infection Was Acquired) Pediatric dose should NEVER exceed adult dose Uncomplicated malaria/ Chloroquine resistance or unknown A. Artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem™)3,4 P. falciparum, or resistance2 Tablet=20mg artemether/ 120 mg lumefantrine species not identified All malarious regions except those specified A 3-day treatment schedule with a total of 6 oral doses is recommended for both adult and pediatric patients based on as chloroquine sensitive listed in the box weight. The patient should receive the initial dose, followed by the second dose 8 hours later, then 1 dose bid for the If “species not identified” below following 2 days. Dosing as follows: is later diagnosed as P. 5–<15 kg: 1 tablet per dose vivax or P. ovale, please 15–<25 kg: 2 tablets per dose see P. vivax and P. ovale 25–<35 kg: 3 tablets per dose (below) re: treatment with ≥35 kg: 4 tablets per dose primaquine or tafenoquine B. Atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone™)4,5 B. Atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone™)4,5 Adult tablet= 250 mg atovaquone/ 100 mg proguanil Adult tab=250 mg atovaquone/ 100 mg proguanil 4 adult tabs po qd x 3 days Peds tab=62.5 mg atovaquone/ 25 mg proguanil 5–<8 kg: 2 peds tabs po qd x 3 days 8–<10 kg: 3 peds tabs po qd x 3 days 10–<20 kg: 1 adult tab po qd x 3 days 20–<30 kg: 2 adult tabs po qd x 3 days 30–<40 kg: 3 adult tabs po qd x 3 days ≥40 kg: 4 adult tabs po qd x 3 days C.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Malaria in the United States a Systematic Review
    CLINICAL REVIEW CLINICIAN’S CORNER Treatment of Malaria in the United States A Systematic Review Kevin S. Griffith, MD, MPH Context Many US clinicians and laboratory personnel are unfamiliar with the diag- Linda S. Lewis, DVM, MPVM nosis and treatment of malaria. Sonja Mali, MPH Objectives To examine the evidence base for management of uncomplicated and severe malaria and to provide clinicians with practical recommendations for the diag- Monica E. Parise, MD nosis and treatment of malaria in the United States. VEN THOUGH ENDEMIC MALARIA Evidence Acquisition Systematic MEDLINE search from 1966 to 2006 using the has been eliminated from the search term malaria (with the subheadings congenital, diagnosis, drug therapy, epi- United States, it remains a lead- demiology, and therapy). Additional references were obtained from searching the bib- ing infectious disease world- liographies of pertinent articles and by reviewing articles suggested by experts in the Ewide. As a consequence, every year in treatment of malaria in North America. the United States an average 1200 cases Evidence Synthesis Important measures to reduce morbidity and mortality from of malaria are reported, almost all im- malaria in the United States include the following: obtaining a travel history, consid- ported, resulting in up to 13 deaths per ering malaria in the differential diagnosis of fever based on the travel history, and year.1 The unfamiliarity of US clini- prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment. Chloroquine remains the treatment cians and laboratory personnel with ma- of choice for Plasmodium falciparum acquired in areas without chloroquine- resistant strains. In areas with chloroquine resistance, a combination of atovaquone laria and drug resistance patterns has and proguanil or quinine plus tetracycline or doxycycline or clindamycin are the best contributed to delays in diagnosis and treatment options.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies
    Arrhythmogenic potential of drugs FP7-HEALTH-241679 http://www.aritmo-project.org/ Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5 – Analytic Database Studies V 1.3 Draft Lead beneficiary: EMC Date: 03/01/2010 Nature: Report Dissemination level: D5.2 Report on Common Study Protocol for Observational Database Studies WP5: Conduct of Additional Observational Security: Studies. Author(s): Gianluca Trifiro’ (EMC), Giampiero Version: v1.1– 2/85 Mazzaglia (F-SIMG) Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFOOMATION AND HISTORY ...........................................................................4 DEFINITIONS .................................................... ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................6 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................7 2. STUDY OBJECTIVES................................ ERRORE. IL SEGNALIBRO NON È DEFINITO. 3. METHODS ..........................................................................................................................8 3.1.STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................8 3.2.DATA SOURCES ..................................................................................................................9 3.2.1. IPCI Database .....................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • FEP® Blue Focus Formulary (907)
    FEP® Blue Focus Formulary (907) Effective January 1, 2022 The FEP formulary includes a preferred drug list which is comprised of Tier 1, generics and Tier 2, preferred brand-name drugs, preferred generic specialty drugs, and preferred brand-name specialty drugs. Ask your physician if there is a generic drug available to treat your condition. If there is no generic drug available, ask your physician to prescribe a preferred brand-name drug. The preferred brand-name drugs within our formulary are listed to identify medicines that are clinically appropriate and cost-effective. Click on the category name in the Table of Contents below to go directly to that page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 PRIOR APPROVAL ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 QUANTITY LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reseptregisteret 2014–2018 the Norwegian Prescription Database 2014–2018
    LEGEMIDDELSTATISTIKK 2019:2 Reseptregisteret 2014–2018 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2014–2018 Reseptregisteret 2014–2018 The Norwegian Prescription Database 2014–2018 Christian Lie Berg Kristine Olsen Solveig Sakshaug Utgitt av Folkehelseinstituttet / Published by Norwegian Institute of Public Health Område for Helsedata og digitalisering Avdeling for Legemiddelstatistikk Juni 2019 Tittel/Title: Legemiddelstatistikk 2019:2 Reseptregisteret 2014–2018 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2014–2018 Forfattere/Authors: Christian Berg, redaktør/editor Kristine Olsen Solveig Sakshaug Acknowledgement: Julie D. W. Johansen (English text) Bestilling/Order: Rapporten kan lastes ned som pdf på Folkehelseinstituttets nettsider: www.fhi.no / The report can be downloaded from www.fhi.no Grafisk design omslag: Fete Typer Ombrekking: Houston911 Kontaktinformasjon / Contact information: Folkehelseinstituttet / Norwegian Institute of Public Health Postboks 222 Skøyen N-0213 Oslo Tel: +47 21 07 70 00 ISSN: 1890-9647 ISBN: 978-82-8406-014-9 Sitering/Citation: Berg, C (red), Reseptregisteret 2014–2018 [The Norwegian Prescription Database 2014–2018] Legemiddelstatistikk 2019:2, Oslo, Norge: Folkehelseinstituttet, 2019. Tidligere utgaver / Previous editions: 2008: Reseptregisteret 2004–2007 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2007 2009: Legemiddelstatistikk 2009:2: Reseptregisteret 2004–2008 / The Norwegian Prescription Database 2004–2008 2010: Legemiddelstatistikk 2010:2: Reseptregisteret 2005–2009. Tema: Vanedannende legemidler / The Norwegian
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States (Based on Drugs
    Guidelines for Treatment of Malaria in the United States 1 (Based on drugs currently available for use in the United States) CDC Malaria Hotline: (770) 488-7788 Monday-Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm EST (770) 488-7100 after hours, weekends and holidays (ask to page the malaria person on-call) Clinical Diagnosis/ Region Infection Acquired Recommended Drug and Adult Dose1,8 Recommended Drug and Pediatric Dose1,8 Plasmodium species Pediatric dose should NEVER exceed adult dose Uncomplicated malaria/ Chloroquine-sensitive Chloroquine phosphate (Aralen™ and generics) Chloroquine phosphate (Aralen™ and generics) P. falciparum or (Central America west of Panama Canal; Haiti; 600 mg base (=1,000 mg salt) po immediately, followed by 10 mg base/kg po immediately, followed by 5 mg Species not identified the Dominican Republic; and most of the Middle 300 mg base (=500 mg salt) po at 6, 24, and 48 hours base/kg po at 6, 24, and 48 hours East) Total dose: 1,500 mg base (=2,500 mg salt) Total dose: 25 mg base/kg 2nd line alternative for treatment: 2nd line alternative for treatment: If “species not identified” is TM TM subsequently diagnosed as P. Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil and generics) Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil and generics) 620 mg base (=800 mg salt) po immediately, followed by 10 mg base/kg po immediately, followed by 5 mg vivax or P ovale: see P. vivax 310 mg base (=400 mg salt) po at 6, 24, and 48 hours base/kg po at 6, 24, and 48 hours and P ovale (below) re. Total dose: 1,550 mg base (=2,000 mg salt) Total dose: 25 mg base/kg treatment with primaquine Chloroquine-resistant or unknown resistance1 A.
    [Show full text]