DOCSLIB.ORG

Maria Falco, Ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli Mindy Peden John Carroll University, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maria Falco, Ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli Mindy Peden John Carroll University, Mpeden@Jcu.Edu John Carroll University Carroll Collected Political Science Fall 2006 Maria Falco, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli Mindy Peden John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/polsci-facpub Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Peden, Mindy, "Maria Falco, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli" (2006). Political Science. 3. http://collected.jcu.edu/polsci-facpub/3 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APA Newsletters Volume 06, Number 1 Fall 2006 NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, SALLY J. SCHOLZ ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN, ROSEMARIE TONG ARTICLES SHARON CRASNOW “Activist Research and the Objectivity of Science” CARMELA EPRIGHT “Praxis and the “F” Word: Young Women, Feminism, Fear” BOOK REVIEWS Naomi Zack: Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women’s Commonality REVIEWED BY CLEA F. REES Sharyn Clough: Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies REVIEWED BY NANCY M. WILLIAMS © 2006 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 Cassandra Pinnick, Noretta Koertge, and Robert Almeder: Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology: An Examination of Gender in Science REVIEWED BY SHARYN CLOUGH Christina Erneling and David Martel, eds.: The Mind as a Scientific Object REVIEWED BY CARMEL FORDE Elizabeth Grosz: Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power REVIEWED BY CATHERINE VILLANUEVA GARDNER Rebecca Kukla: Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers’ Bodies REVIEWED BY LAURA NEWHART Maurice Hamington and Dorothy C. Miller, eds.: Socializing Care REVIEWED BY LAUREN FLEMING Lisa Adkins and Beverly Skeggs: Feminism after Bourdieu REVIEWED BY CHRISTINA SMERICK Maria Falco, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Niccolò Macchiavelli REVIEWED BY MINDY PEDEN Peter Knox-Shaw: Jane Austen and the Enlightenment REVIEWED BY MONICA SHORES Lorraine Code, ed.: Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer REVIEWED BY JAMEY FINDLING Jane Duran: Eight Women Philosophers: Theory, Politics, and Feminism REVIEWED BY MAURICE HAMINGTON Sally J. Scholz and Shannon M. Mussett, eds.: The Contradictions of Freedom: Philosophical Essays on Simone de Beauvoir’s The Mandarins REVIEWED BY ROBIN MARGARET JAMES Margaret A. Simons, Marybeth Timmerman, and Mary Beth Mader, eds.: Simone de Beauvoir: Philosophical Writings REVIEWED BY DERA SIPE CONTRIBUTORS APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy Sally J. Scholz, Editor Fall 2006 Volume 06, Number 1 careful analysis of class and race bias in a liberal feminist claim ROM THE DITOR for women’s right or duty to work in the paid labor force. They F E also reveal a sort of paradox as the goals of feminism appear accomplished to some, while others among us view sexist oppression as well-entrenched and in need of further feminist More than one popular media outlet has asked whether response. feminism is dead. Certainly we know that rumors of its death Epright examines this phenomenon of the paradox of have been greatly exaggerated. But what some of the queries feminism as advocate for personal choice by sharing some of reveal is wonderment about activism. Activists of every sort— her students’ responses to an introduction to feminist theory not just feminist—have sought innovative and creative avenues class. Epright’s sometimes wry look at how feminism is received for effecting social change. Protesting has not lost its power, but by conservative college students adds a subtlety to the analysis, door-to-door organizing, email campaigns, online petitions and including the students’ own reluctance to recognize how blogs, civic organizations and lobbying, and even legislative oppression might structure their lives. She argues, “Because initiatives have come to replace some of the in-your-face/in- feminist theory recognizes that there are contradictory and your-street political activism that characterized earlier years in confusing questions to be asked about women’s experience, the feminist campaign. Moreover, as feminist theory continues embracing feminism as a way of being in the world, as opposed to make in-roads in theory and practice, activism changes or to merely viewing it as a way of reading and thinking through adapts in order to seek new goals or advance new ideals. texts, would require them to accept more ambiguity and tolerate Sharon Crasnow asks about the proper role of activism more complexity than their familial, religious, and cultural in scientific inquiry in her article, “Activist Research and the conceptions will permit.” As teachers of feminist theory, many Objectivity of Science.” Contrary to the more common view of us have confronted the dilemma Epright discusses. Her article that activist commitments “impede gathering, interpreting, offers a helpful way to think through our obligations as teachers, and evaluating evidence and thus compromise objectivity,” activists, feminists, and philosophers. Crasnow argues that “activism is one of the means through The rest of the issue features fourteen book reviews ranging which standpoint can be achieved.” She employs the particular from feminist philosophy of science to maternal bodies and case of an anthropologist who, because of her activism with care, from feminist critiques and appropriations of canonical the women of her study community, came to see not just the figures to contributions of specific feminist philosophers. effects of oppressive practices but also the social structure that Reviewers do us all a tremendous service, and I would like maintained it. Crasnow’s article is suggestive on a number to express my gratitude to the many people who have written of levels. In addition to encouraging scholars to see the reviews for this Newsletter. New books continue to come in—a practical challenges of their theories, it expands what might sign of our ever-present activism within the academy—and new be understood as activism. Can our scholarship be seen as reviewers are needed. If you would like to write a review, please activism insofar as it pushes the boundaries of traditional theory send me your CV by email. This is an excellent opportunity for or challenges oppressive structures within that theory? established scholars and graduate students alike. Carmela Epright’s comments in “Praxis and the ‘F’ Word: Young Women, Feminism, Fear” come at an interesting time. Endnotes A recent article in Newsweek magazine featuring a discussion 1. “Fast Chat: Managing Mommies,” Newsweek, (June 19, 2006): with Linda Hirshman sparked numerous hostile responses.1 10. Hirshman’s book is Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women Hirshman had said that women must work outside the home of the World (New York: Viking, 2006). in order to have a political voice. Most of the letters in response 2. Letters: “The Mommy Wars Rage On,” Newsweek, (July 10, claimed that feminism is about choice, and women’s decision 2006): 26 & 30. to stay at home should be affirmed by feminists rather than 3. Ibid., 26. disparaged.2 As one letter writer put it, the view that women 4. Ibid., 30. must work outside the home “is extremely skewed and goes against the entire concept of what feminism stands for. My understanding of feminism is that it’s the right for a woman to choose the path that is best for her, whether that be working ABOUT THE NEWSLETTER ON a full-time job or being a full-time mom.”3 Another indicated that her experiences in parent organizations and community FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY volunteer opportunities gave her the political power and social honor Hirshman claimed was only possible through paid work.4 These letters might be written off as simplistic understandings The Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy is sponsored by the of feminism, but that might be a mistake. They offer sometimes APA Committee on the Status of Women (CSW). The Newsletter — APA Newsletter, Fall 2006, Volume 06, Number 1 — is designed to provide an introduction to recent philosophical organized a panel on “Women’s Choices: Family Matters in work that addresses issues of gender. None of the varied the Profession” and a panel on “Publishing as a Feminist” at philosophical views presented by authors of Newsletter articles the 2006 Pacific Division meeting. Anita Superson organized a necessarily reflects the views of any or all of the members of panel on “Teaching in a Climate of Conservation” and a panel on the Committee on the Status of Women, including the editor(s) “Feminism and Disability” at the 2006 Central Division meeting. of the Newsletter, nor does the committee advocate any Among the co-sponsors of one or more of these panels were particular type of feminist philosophy. We advocate only that the Committee on Inclusiveness, the Committee for the Defense serious philosophical attention be given to issues of gender of Professional Rights of Philosophers, and the Committee on and that claims of gender bias in philosophy receive full and Philosophy and Law. The CSW makes a point of collaborating fair consideration. whenever possible with other committees attentive to the voices and interests of women philosophers. As usual, the CSW focused some attention on (1) structural issues such as the Committee on Committees’ criteria for SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND selection of new committee members and chairs and (2) financial issues such as the size of the annual budgets provided INFORMATION by the National Office to the various standing and diversity committees. In the main, however, the CSW reflected on the fact that despite all the progress women in the profession 1. Purpose: The purpose of the Newsletter is to publish have made, philosophy remains what may be the most male- information about the status of women in philosophy and populated field in the humanities. According to available APA to make the resources of feminist philosophy more widely data, a persistent 75 percent male/25 percent female breakdown available.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2019 A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry Karina Bucciarelli Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses Part of the Epistemology Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, and the Philosophy of Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucciarelli, Karina, "A Feminist Epistemological Framework: Preventing Knowledge Distortions in Scientific Inquiry" (2019). Scripps Senior Theses. 1365. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1365 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK: PREVENTING KNOWLEDGE DISTORTIONS IN SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY by KARINA MARTINS BUCCIARELLI SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR SUSAN CASTAGNETTO PROFESSOR RIMA BASU APRIL 26, 2019 Bucciarelli 2 Acknowledgements First off, I would like to thank my wonderful family for supporting me every step of the way. Mamãe e Papai, obrigada pelo amor e carinho, mil telefonemas, conversas e risadas. Obrigada por não só proporcionar essa educação incrível, mas também me dar um exemplo de como viver. Rafa, thanks for the jokes, the editing help and the spontaneous phone calls. Bela, thank you for the endless time you give to me, for your patience and for your support (even through WhatsApp audios). To my dear friends, thank you for the late study nights, the wild dance parties, the laughs and the endless support.
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science
    OBJECTIVITY IN THE FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requisites for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Karen Cordrick Haely, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Louise M. Antony, Adviser Professor Donald C. Hubin _______________________ Professor George Pappas Adviser Philosophy Graduate Program ABSTRACT According to a familiar though naïve conception, science is a rigorously neutral enterprise, free from social and cultural influence, but more sophisticated philosophical views about science have revealed that cultural and personal interests and values are ubiquitous in scientific practice, and thus ought not be ignored when attempting to understand, describe and prescribe proper behavior for the practice of science. Indeed, many theorists have argued that cultural and personal interests and values must be present in science (and knowledge gathering in general) in order to make sense of the world. The concept of objectivity has been utilized in the philosophy of science (as well as in epistemology) as a way to discuss and explore the various types of social and cultural influence that operate in science. The concept has also served as the focus of debates about just how much neutrality we can or should expect in science. This thesis examines feminist ideas regarding how to revise and enrich the concept of objectivity, and how these suggestions help achieve both feminist and scientific goals. Feminists offer us warnings about “idealized” concepts of objectivity, and suggest that power can play a crucial role in determining which research programs get labeled “objective”.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Empiricism Draws in Various Ways
    2 FEMINIST EMPIRICISM CATHERINE E. HUNDLEBY eminist empiricism draws in various ways developing new accounts of agency in knowl- on the philosophical tradition of empiri- edge emerges as the second theme in feminist F cism, which can be defined as epistemol- empiricism. ogy that gives primary importance to knowledge Most feminist empiricists employ the meth- based on experience. Feminist demands for atten- odology for developing epistemology known as tion to women’s experiences suggest that empiri- naturalized or naturalist epistemology. Naturalism cism can be a promising resource for developing is controversial, but it welcomes disputation, a feminist account of knowledge. Yet feminists takes up new resources for epistemology on an also value empiricism’s purchase on science and ongoing basis, and encourages multiple approaches the empiricist view that knowers’ abilities depend to the evaluation of knowledge. This pluralism on their experiences and their experiential histo- undercuts naturalism’s and empiricism’s conser- ries, including socialization and psychological vative tendencies and imbues current formula- development. tions of empiricism with radical potential. This chapter explores the attractions of empiricism for feminists. Feminist empiricist analysis ranges from broad considerations about FEMINIST ATTRACTION TO EMPIRICISM popular understandings to technical analysis of narrowly defined scientific fields. Whatever the Empiricism traces in the philosophy of the scope, feminist reworkings of empiricism have global North as far back as Aristotle,1 but it is two central themes. The first theme is the inter- classically associated with the 18th-century play among values in knowledge, especially British philosophers, John Locke, George connecting traditionally recognized empirical Berkeley, and David Hume.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality
    Developing a Critical Realist Positional Approach to Intersectionality ANGELA MARTINEZ DY University of Nottingham LEE MARTIN University of Nottingham SUSAN MARLOW University of Nottingham This article identifies philosophical tensions and limitations within contemporary intersectionality theory which, it will be argued, have hindered its ability to explain how positioning in multiple social categories can affect life chances and influence the reproduction of inequality. We draw upon critical realism to propose an augmented conceptual framework and novel methodological approach that offers the potential to move beyond these debates, so as to better enable intersectionality to provide causal explanatory accounts of the ‘lived experiences’ of social privilege and disadvantage. KEYWORDS critical realism, critique, feminism, intersectionality, methodology, ontology Introduction Intersectionality has emerged over the past thirty years as an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the concurrent impacts of social structures, with a focus on theorizing how belonging to multiple exclusionary social categories can influence political access and equality.1 It conceptualizes the interaction of categories of difference such as gender, race and class at many levels, including individual experience, social practices, institutions and ideologies, and frames the outcomes of these interactions in terms of the distribution and allocation of power.2 As a form of social critique originally rooted in black feminism,3 intersectionality is described by Jennifer
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of Feminist Research and Its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D
    Home | Business|Career | Workplace | Community | Money | International Advancing Women In Leadership Feminist Epistemology: The Foundation of Feminist Research and its Distinction from Traditional Research Joanne Ardovini-Brooker, Ph.D. ARDOVINI-BROOKER, SPRING, 2002 ...feminist epistemologies are the golden keys that unlock the door to feminist research. Once the door is unlocked, a better understanding of the distinctive nature of feminist research can occur. There are many questions surrounding feminist research. The most common question is: “What makes feminist research distinctive from traditional research within the Social Sciences?” In trying to answer this question, we need to examine feminist epistemology and the intertwining nature of epistemology, methodology (theory and analysis of how research should proceed), and methods (techniques for gathering data) utilized by feminist researchers. Feminist epistemology in contrast to traditional epistemologies is the foundation on which feminist methodology is built. In turn, the research that develops from this methodology differs greatly from research that develops from traditional methodology and epistemology. Therefore, I argue that one must have a general understanding of feminist epistemology and methodology before one can understand what makes this type of research unique. Such a foundation will assist us in our exploration of the realm of feminist research, while illuminating the differences between feminist and traditional research. An Introduction to Feminist Epistemology Epistemology is the study of knowledge and how it is that people come to know what they know (Johnson, 1995, p. 97). Originating from philosophy, epistemology comes to us from a number of disciplines, i.e.: sociology, psychology, political science, education, and women’s studies (Duran, 1991, p.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMINIST and GENDER THEORY for HISTORIANS: a Theoretical and Methodological Introduction
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of History History/WMST 730 (graduate course) (Cross-listed with the Department of Women’s Studies) FEMINIST AND GENDER THEORY FOR HISTORIANS: A Theoretical and Methodological Introduction SPRING 2018 DRAFT SYLLABUS Instructor: Karen Hagemann Time of the Course: Wednesday, 5:30 – 8:00 pm Location of the Course: HM 425 Office Hours: Tuesday 1-3 pm or by appointment Office: Hamilton Hall 562 Email: [email protected] SHORT DESCRIPTION After more than forty years of research, it is time for a critical stocktaking of the theoretical and methodological developments in the field of women's and gender history. The course will therefore acquaint students with the major development of the field since the 1970s and consider the texts of authors such as Judith Bennett, Gisela Bock, Judith Butler, Kathleen Canning, R.W. Connell, Natalie Z. Davis, Evelyn Brooks Higginbottam, Joan Kelly, Gerda Lerner, Joan W. Scott, Sonya O. Rose, and John Tosh, in a chronological and systematical order, to understand how and why the theoretical and methodological debates developed in a specific direction. AIMS AND AGENDA OF THE COURSE Recovering the lives of women from the neglect of historians was the goal of women's history from its inception. Its methodology and interests have evolved over time as it has become established as an academic discipline. From its early origins in cataloguing great women in 15 September 2017 2 history, in the 1970s it turned to recording ordinary women's expectations, aspirations and status. Then, with the rise of the feminist movement, the emphasis shifted in the 1980s towards exposing the oppression of women and examining how they responded to discrimination and subordination.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements Amanda Huminski The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2826 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY AND FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY: CONFLICTS AND COMPLEMENTS by AMANDA HUMINSKI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 AMANDA HUMINSKI All Rights Reserved ii Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements By Amanda Huminski This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________ ________________________________________________ Date Linda Martín Alcoff Chair of Examining Committee _______________________________ ________________________________________________ Date Nickolas Pappas Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Jesse Prinz Miranda Fricker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Experimental Philosophy and Feminist Epistemology: Conflicts and Complements by Amanda Huminski Advisor: Jesse Prinz The recent turn toward experimental philosophy, particularly in ethics and epistemology, might appear to be supported by feminist epistemology, insofar as experimental philosophy signifies a break from the tradition of primarily white, middle-class men attempting to draw universal claims from within the limits of their own experience and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Archives: an Historian's View on the Liberation of Clio by JOANNA SCHNEIDER ZANGRANDO
    Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/36/2/203/2745774/aarc_36_2_201u366290227045.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 Women in Archives: An Historian's View on the Liberation of Clio By JOANNA SCHNEIDER ZANGRANDO UCY STONE, a leading feminist, addressing a national woman's L rights convention in Cincinnati in 1855, declared: The last speaker alluded to this movement as being that of a few disap- pointed women. From the first years to which my memory stretches, I have been a disappointed woman. When, with my brothers, I reached forth after the sources of knowledge, I was reproved with "It isn't fit for you; it doesn't belong to women." ... I was disappointed when I came to seek a profession worthy an immortal being—every employment was closed to me, except those of the teacher, the seamstress, and the housekeeper. In education, in marriage, in religion, in everything, dis- appointment is the lot of woman. It shall be the business of my life to deepen this disappointment in every woman's heart until she bows down to it no longer. I wish that women, instead of being walking show-cases, instead of begging of their fathers and brothers the latest and gayest new bonnet, would ask of them their rights.1 Echoes of Lucy Stone's disappointment have persisted for over a century. So, too, have the scorn and derision directed at "disap- pointed women," couched in questions such as "Who are these women?" and "What do they want?" Among professional historians the question is whether there are enough sources to justify research and teaching efforts devoted only to women.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education
    education sciences Article Knowledge for a Common World? On the Place of Feminist Epistemology in Philosophy of Education Claudia Schumann Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm S-106 91, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-816-2000 Academic Editor: Andrew Stables Received: 7 January 2016; Accepted: 3 March 2016; Published: 9 March 2016 Abstract: The paper discusses the place of feminist epistemology in philosophy of education. Against frequently raised criticisms, the paper argues that the issues raised by feminist standpoint theory lead neither to a reduction of questions of knowledge to questions of power or politics nor to the endorsement of relativism. Within the on-going discussion in feminist epistemology, we can find lines of argument which provide the grounds for a far more radical critique of the traditional, narrow notion of objectivity, revealing it as inherently flawed and inconsistent and allowing for the defense of a re-worked, broader, more accurate understanding of objectivity. This is also in the interest of developing a strong basis for a feminist critique of problematically biased and repressive epistemological practices which can further be extended to shed light on the way in which knowledge has become distorted through the repression of other non-dominant epistemic standpoints. Thus, requiring a thorough re-thinking of our conceptions of objectivity and rationality, feminist epistemologies need to be carefully considered in order to improve our understanding of what knowledge for a common world implies in the pluralistic and diverse societies of post-traditional modernity in the 21st century. Keywords: feminist epistemology; situated knowledge; objectivity; relativism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Life of Learning by Gerda Lerner 1-21 the Charles Homer Haskins Lecture
    A LIFE OF LEARNING Gerda Lerner Charles Homer Haskins Lecture for 2005 American Council of Learned Societies ACLS OCCASIONAL PAPER, No. 60 ISSN 1041-536X Contents The Charles Homer Haskins Prize Lecture Series ii Brief Biography of Gerda Lerner iii Introduction by Pauline Yu v A Life of Learning by Gerda Lerner 1-21 The Charles Homer Haskins Lecture Charles Homer Haskins (1870–1937), for whom the ACLS lecture series is named, was the first Chairman of the American Council of Learned Societies, from 1920 to 1926. He began his teaching career at the Johns Hopkins University, where he received the B.A. degree in 1887, and the Ph.D. in 1890. He later taught at the University of Wisconsin and at Harvard, where he was Henry Charles Lea Professor of Medieval History at the time of his retirement in 1931, and Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences from 1908 to 1924. He served as president of the American Historical Association in 1922, and was a founder and the second president of the Medieval Academy of America in 1926. A great American teacher, Charles Homer Haskins also did much to establish the reputation of American scholarship abroad. His distinction was recognized in honorary degrees from Strasbourg, Padua, Manchester, Paris, Louvain, Caen, Harvard, Wisconsin, and Allegheny College, where in 1883 he had begun his higher education at the age of thirteen. Haskins Lecturers 2005 Gerda Lerner 1994 Robert K. Merton 2004 Peter Gay 1993 Annemarie Schimmel 2003 Peter Brown 1992 Donald W. Meinig 2002 Henry A. Millon 1991 Milton Babbit 2001 Helen Vendler 1990 Paul Oskar Kristeller 2000 Geoffrey Hartman 1989 Judith N.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Ethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is "Strong Objectivity"?
    ~ethinkingStandpoint Epistemology: What Is "Strong Objectivity"? ~andraHarding "Feminist objectivity means quite simply situated knowledges." -Donna Harawayl . Both Ways For almost two decades, feminists have engaged in a complex and harged conversation about objectivity. Its topics have included which inds of knowledge projects have it, which don't, and why they don't; ihether the many different feminisms need it, and if so why they do; nd if it is possible to get it, how to do so.2 This conversation has been >formed by complex and charged prefeminist writings that tend to et stuck in debates between empiricists and intentionalists, objectiv- its and interpretationists, and realists and social constructionists (in- luding p~ststructuralists).~ Most of these feminist discussions have not arisen from attempts ) find new ways either to criticize or carry on the agendas of the isciplines. Frequently they do not take as their problematics the ones ~miliarwithin the disciplines. Instead, these conversations have merged mainly from two different and related concerns. First, what -e the causes of the immense proliferation of theoretically and em- irically sound results of research in biology and the social sciences at have discovered what is not supposed to exist: rampant sexist and ldrocentric bias-"politicsu!-in the dominant scientific (and pop- .ar) descriptions and explanations of nature and social life? To put .e point another way, how should one explain the surprising fact that ~liticallyguided research projects have been able to produce
    [Show full text]
  • Tuning Gender Studies
    Tuning Educational Structures in Europe Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Life Long Learning Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Reference Points for the Design and Delivery of Degree Programmes in Gender Studies Tuning Educational Structures in Europe The name Tuning was chosen for the project to refl ect the idea that universities do not look for uniformity in their degree programmes or any sort of unifi ed, prescriptive or defi nitive European cur- ricula but simply for points of reference, convergence and common understanding. The protection of the rich diversity of European education has been paramount in the Tuning Project from the very start and the project in no way seeks to restrict the independence of academic and subject special- ists, or undermine local and national academic authority. The Tuning Project is supported by the European Commission through the Socrates and Tempus programmes (of the Directorate-General for Education and Culture) This publication refl ects the views of the authors only, and the European Com- mission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. © Tuning Project Although all material that has been developed as part of the Tuning Project is owned by its formal participants, other Higher Education Institutions are free to test and use the material after publication, provided that the source is ac- knowledged. No part of this publication, including the cover design, may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, whether electronical, chemical, mechanical, optical, by recording or photocopying, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]