Germany's Lessons for Korea: the Strategic Diplomacy of Unification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Germany's Lessons for Korea: the Strategic Diplomacy of Unification https://www.globalasia.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=articles&wr_id=9161 Germany’s unification in 1990 is often referred to as a textbook case for the Korean Peninsula. In this essay, we compare notes on German and Korean unification by looking at entry, tipping and endpoints of strategic diplomacy. We argue that political integration needs to drive the strategic diplomacy of Korean unification. German unification was not preordained, but was the product of strategic choices made at critical junctures of the process. While long-term developments post-1945 created an international environment that facilitated the acceptance of German unification by the key stakeholders, in the Korean case, the US, China, South Korea and North Korea pursue very different strategic goals and interests. To substantiate the argument, this paper is in five sections: section 1 investigates key features of the complex European and Northeast Asian security systems; 2 examines entry points of German and Korean unification diplomacy; 3 highlights the tipping points (potential and actual) of unification; 4 briefly looks at the endpoints of German and Korean unification diplomacy; 5 offers some potential lessons for the Korean Peninsula. 1) THE SYSTEM AT PLAY IN EUROPE AND NORTHEAST ASIA The Cold War system in Europe was designed to address the problem of German power,1 an issue that was paramount for regional and global stability. Western Europe’s post-1945 security system tied the German Gulliver to a web of institutional arrangements — the Western European Union, the European Economic Community, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) — designed to tame German power. Closely intertwined was a whole cluster of questions related to the US role in Europe — for example, the US military presence, the relationship with major European allies, especially in the nuclear area, and the rationale for NATO. In a nutshell, this post-1945 security system was extremely complex, with regional security closely interconnected with global order and vice versa. Yet, the vision and grand design was conducive to the achievement of unification more than four decades later. The terms and conditions of the end of the Cold War in Europe were deeply influenced by the long-term vision and aspirations of the early post-war leaders.2 In contemporary Northeast Asia, by contrast, the problem of unequal power remains unresolved. There is no overarching, accepted institutional framework, underwritten by a social compact between major and smaller countries, which would tame and legitimize unequal power, most prominently between China and the US but also between Japan and China. The management of unequal power trumps institutional design; any institutional form must follow the function of a grand bargain on the rules of the regional game.3 Yet, this set of bargains has yet to be struck (see Evelyn Goh’s contribution in this cover package on page 58). As a result, in Northeast Asia, institutional complexity and pluralism are defining features of the regional order4 and there are multiple potential access points and avenues for collective action. Especially after the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, the US-led hub-and-spoke system of alliances to contain the Soviet Union and China has been transformed into a web of complex relationships, often co-existing, sometimes competing. Despite this 1 of 7 3/01/2017 1:40 PM https://www.globalasia.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=articles&wr_id=9161 pluralism, the US is still the key player in the Northeast Asian security system, which defines the diplomatic dynamics on the Korean Peninsula. 2) ENTRY POINTS FOR UNIFICATION DIPLOMACY There were both long-term and short-term entry points for German unification diplomacy. Looked at from a long-term perspective, unification had been the key strategic goal of West German foreign policy since the creation of the Federal Republic. West Germany’s first chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, argued that the rebuilding of German democracy, economic revival and the full integration of Germany into the European and Atlantic co-operative structures would finally produce unification. Western integration was seen as the sine qua non for achieving this goal. Yet, with the division of Europe deepening in the 1950s and 1960s, unification became more aspirational than real. A complementary approach was necessary that focused more on the acceptance of the status quo, accompanied by rapprochement and engagement to lower East-West tensions. This became strongly expressed in Chancellor Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik beginning in 1969 and was sustained by the succeeding chancellorships of Helmut Schmidt and Helmut Kohl. As Kaiser has rightly observed, “[t]o preserve the essence of a common nation, West German policy inevitably had to deal with an East German state.”5 The explicit acceptance of the status quo was considered necessary and inevitable in order to change it. The short-term entry points of German unification diplomacy were at least three-fold. First, the constellation of leadership at the highest levels was remarkable. In 1989-90, the cast of leaders in key countries had unusual long-term experience, and had previously co-operated and developed personal relationships, which clearly facilitated what would become “the most intensive phase of bilateral and multilateral diplomacy in European history.”6 Second, both Moscow and Washington expressed a clear and unequivocal commitment to peaceful change. This was particularly important since East German security forces had made preparations to use armed force to suppress mass demonstrations in Leipzig and Dresden. Yet, Mikhail Gorbachev stressed from the beginning that the East German Politburo’s refusal to engage in controlled reform had become an increasing problem for Moscow. Despite initial discussions about a military intervention in East Germany, he was ultimately unwilling to support any action that could have led to a repeat of the Tiananmen incident. Third, the diplomacy of German unification was driven by a range of tipping points, actual and potential, which defined the pace and the dynamics of the process. In sum, the long-term and short-term entry points of German unification diplomacy produced a number of strategic opportunities that created new momentum for the redesign of the Cold War European order. Yet these strategic opportunities were accompanied by a clear tactical sense about the institutional process that translated strategies into diplomatic outcomes. Equally important was the agreement on a strategic narrative (“One Europe whole and free”) to generate the necessary “buy-in” from the wider international community. In this context, the two-plus-four process, commencing with the first ministerial meeting in Bonn in May 1990, constituted the strategic hub and “pivot”7 that allocated roles and responsibilities to bilateral and multilateral forums to discuss the political, economic and military ramifications of German unification. The entry point was the jointly developed agreement by the two German states on the external aspects of unification, which was then communicated to and negotiated with the Four Powers. As a result, German unification was not the result of a major peace conference but of the Treaty on the Final Settlement, signed by the six parties on Sept. 12, 1990, in Moscow. Looked at from the perspective of strategic diplomacy, the German case highlights three interconnected entry points — two long-term and one short-term — that are relevant for the Korean Peninsula. First, the fundamental importance of functioning bilateral relations between the divided countries. Inter-Korean relations have been a — and sometimes are the — critical issue in the Northeast Asian regional order. 2 of 7 3/01/2017 1:40 PM https://www.globalasia.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=articles&wr_id=9161 Hence, unification diplomacy itself is an important entry point to the complex Northeast Asian security system. The Sunshine Policy of South Korea toward North Korea from 1998 to 2007 in many respects resembled the core tenets of West Germany’s late 1960s Ostpolitik. South Korea’s Nordpolitik constituted a long-term entry point based on the idea of peaceful co-existence and normalization of inter- Korean relations.8 The Sunshine Policy aimed at shaping the system to facilitate Korean unification diplomacy. The three principles underlying the Sunshine Policy — a) no armed provocation by North Korea will be tolerated; b) South Korea will not attempt to absorb the North in any way; and, c) South Korea will actively engage in co-operation — effectively accept the status quo in order to achieve long-term change. In sum, Trustpolitik is the sine qua non of the strategic diplomacy of Korean unification. A long-term solid engagement approach needs to complement any short-term coercive policies such as sanctions, military confrontations or suspending joint high-profile projects such as the Kaesong Industrial Complex. The second long-term entry point is the effective management by the great powers — the US and China — of issues related to the Korean Peninsula. Historically, the US has been supportive of unification. Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton backed peaceful unification based upon “terms acceptable to the Korean people.” In 2009, President Lee Myung-bak and President Barack Obama announced the Joint Vision for the Alliance in which both presidents expressed their commitment to peaceful reunification of the Korean Peninsula.9 Furthermore, in 2013, President Park Geun-hye and Obama announced that they would foster “peaceful unification based on the principles of denuclearization, democracy and a free market economy.”10 Notwithstanding such declarations, it is not certain whether US operational policy would support Korean unification as it did in the German case. According to a Council on Foreign Relations report, US priorities toward the Korean Peninsula are: 1) prevent horizontal proliferation; 2) stop vertical proliferation; 3) denuclearize; 4) plan for contingencies; 5) promote engagement; and, 6) improve the situation for the North Korean people.11 That is, US priorities lie in denuclearizing North Korea.
Recommended publications
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The
    BECOMING ONE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NATIONAL UNIFICATION IN VIETNAM, YEMEN AND GERMANY A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Conflict Resolution By Min Jung Kim, B.A. Washington, DC May 1, 2009 I owe my most sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor Kevin Doak, Ph.D. for his guidance and support and to Aviel Roshwald, Ph.D. and Tristan Mabry, Ph.D. for detailed and constructive comments. Min Jung Kim ii BECOMING ONE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NATIONAL UNIFICATION IN VIETNAM, YEMEN AND GERMANY Min Jung Kim, B.A. Thesis Advisor: Kevin M. Doak, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to understand the dynamic processes of modern national unification cases in Vietnam (1976), Yemen (1990) and Germany (1990) in a qualitative manner within the framework of Amitai Etizoni’s political integration theory. There has been little use of this theory in cases of inter-state unification despite its apparent applicability. This study assesses different factors (military force, utilitarian and identitive factors) that influence unification in order to understand which were most supportive of unification and which resulted in a consolidation unification in the early to intermediate stages. In order to answer the above questions, the thesis uses the level of integration as a dependent variable and the various methods of unification as independent variables. The dependent variables are measured as follows: whether unified states were able to protect its territory from potential violence and secessions and to what extent alienation emerged amongst its members.
    [Show full text]
  • – the Debate in the International Communist Movement. Contributions from Various Maoist Parties
    In the aftermath of the demise of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement [RIM] , there were interventions on the need for a regrouping of international co-thinkers. Here is a selection of documents for that period that provides the broad outline of the arguments and responses of the varying self-declared competing Maoist trends. Page | 1 – The debate in the international communist movement. Contributions from various Maoist parties. The international review ‘Maoist Road’ No.1 2011 Introduction This is not a formal meeting or a conference, but a workshop in which we discuss on how to carry forward the magazine and our work in general. We need to debate the question of the Revolutionary Internationalist Movement (RIM), including the position put forward by the document sent by Indian comrades. Canadian comrades propose to debate also the people’s war in the imperialist countries. Finally, since there are organizations active in imperialist countries, we will have also brief reports on the various national situations. On the RIM PCm Italy Here we briefly review the history of the process of RIM, since it is clear that today we need to continue that thread in order to advance in our work. We are one of the founding parties of RIM. The constitution of RIM was the result of the RCP US pulse. That party played a positive role in achieving this milestone in the reconstruction of the international communist movement (ICM) after the death of Mao and the end of the GCPR. It was the result of an agreement between various influential forces in ICM.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia and the Yemeni Struggle for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Membership
    Saudi Arabia and the Yemeni Struggle for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Membership 1979- 2014 Mubarak Mohammed Rajis Aldossari Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Languages, Cultures and Societies April 2018 Words Count 81694 1 DECLARATION "The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his/her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others." COPYRIGHT “This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement” © 1214, the University of Leeds. Mubarak Mohammed Rajis Aldossari 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would never have been able to finish my thesis without the guidance of my supervisor Dr. Hendrik Kraetzschmar, help from friends, and support from my family. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my adviser, Dr. Hendrik Kraetzschmar for the immeasurable amount of support and guidance he has provided throughout this study. Dr. Hedrick’s insights into and patient endurance throughout this project have been a true blessing, I admit that it would not be possible for me to finish this humble work without his excellent guidance, caring, patience, and providing me with an excellent atmosphere for doing research. I would like to thank from Kuwait, Dr. Abdullah al-Nafisi, Dr. Ayed Almanaa and Dr. Haia Almkami, who hosted me at their own homes and offered me their time to answer my questions. In addition, I would like to extend my sincerest thanks and appreciation to the faculty members in the Department of History at the University of Kuwait.
    [Show full text]
  • Gendered Rhetoric in North Korea's International
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2015 Gendered rhetoric in North Korea’s international relations (1946–2011) Amanda Kelly Anderson University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Anderson, Amanda Kelly, Gendered rhetoric in North Korea’s international relations (1946–2011), Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Germans Brought Their Communism to Yemen
    Miriam M. Müller A Spectre is Haunting Arabia Political Science | Volume 26 This book is dedicated to my parents and grandparents. I wouldn’t be who I am without you. Miriam M. Müller (Joint PhD) received her doctorate jointly from the Free Uni- versity of Berlin, Germany, and the University of Victoria, Canada, in Political Science and International Relations. Specialized in the politics of the Middle East, she focuses on religious and political ideologies, international security, international development and foreign policy. Her current research is occupied with the role of religion, violence and identity in the manifestations of the »Isla- mic State«. Miriam M. Müller A Spectre is Haunting Arabia How the Germans Brought Their Communism to Yemen My thanks go to my supervisors Prof. Dr. Klaus Schroeder, Prof. Dr. Oliver Schmidtke, Prof. Dr. Uwe Puschner, and Prof. Dr. Peter Massing, as well as to my colleagues and friends at the Forschungsverbund SED-Staat, the Center for Global Studies at the University of Victoria, and the Political Science Depart- ment there. This dissertation project has been generously supported by the German Natio- nal Academic Foundation and the Center for Global Studies, Victoria, Canada. A Dissertation Submitted in (Partial) Fulfillment of the Requirements for the- Joint Doctoral Degree (Cotutelle) in the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences ofthe Free University of Berlin, Germany and the Department of Political Scien- ceof the University of Victoria, Canada in October 2014. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer- cial-NoDerivs 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non- commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification in Yemen
    UNIFICATION IN YEMEN Dynamics of Political Integration, 1978-2000 Sharif Ismail Wadham College Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of MPhil in Modern Middle Eastern Studies Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford 1 Contents Acknowledgements 3 List of Abbreviations 4 Maps 5 1. Introduction 10 2. Theories and Methods 12 Deutsch, Security Communities and the Pluralist Model 12 The Challenge from Functionalism and Neo-functionalism 14 Federalism and Lessons from Etzioni 14 Migdal and the Question of ‘Social Control’ 15 Towards a Synthesis 16 Methodology 17 3. Reviewing Elite-centred Histories of Unification 19 Constrained State-building, Accommodation and Co-option in the YAR 19 Weakening State Control in the PDRY 21 The Enduring Theme: discourses of a united Yemen 23 Explaining Unification 23 Elite-level Politics in the Transition Period 25 Elite-level Politics after 1994: S!lih and the GPC triumphant 28 4. Coercive Contest: the limits of the state’s attempts to enforce integration 30 Theoretical Considerations 30 The Situation in the North pre-1990 31 The Situation in the South pre-1990 34 The Transition Period 37 The Civil War 39 The Post-War Impasse: negotiating a limited ‘Security State’ 40 Conclusion 43 5. The Battle for Control of Yemen’s Water Resources 45 Theoretical Considerations 45 The Situation in the North pre-1990 46 The Situation in the South pre-1990 48 The Transition Period 51 Political Compromise, 1994-2000: the limits of state control 53 Conclusion 55 6. Defining a New National Discourse in the Education Sector 56 Theoretical Considerations 56 The Situation in the North pre-1990 56 The Situation in the South pre-1990 60 The Transition Period 63 Negotiating the Education Agenda, 1994-2000 67 Conclusion 69 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia Faced with Modernity: from the Demographic Transition to 'Vision 2030'
    Master’s Degree Programme – Second Cycle (D.M. 270/2004) in Relazioni Internazionali Comparate – International Relations Final Thesis Saudi Arabia Faced with Modernity: from the Demographic Transition to 'Vision 2030' Supervisor Ch. Prof.ssa. Maria Cristina Paciello Co-Supervisor Ch. Prof. Duccio Basosi Graduand Saverio Violi Matriculation Number: 850845 Academic Year 2015 / 2016 a Martino 2 Table of Contents Figures ...................................................................................... 6 List of Abbreviations .................................................................. 7 Abstract .................................................................................... 9 Summary (Italian) .................................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................. 19 CHAPTER 1 SAUDI DEMOGRAPHY: A CHANGING DNA 1.1 POPULATION GROWTH: KEY INDICATORS 1.1.1 THE POPULATION LEAP ............................................................................ 28 1.1.2 AGE DISTRIBUTION: THE YOUTH BULGE ................................................ 30 1.1.3 UNEMPLOYMENT RATE ............................................................................. 33 1.1.4 FOREIGN WORKERS .................................................................................. 34 1.1.5 SHAPING THE COUNTRY: THE URBANIZATION PROCESS ................... 36 1.1.6 THE SHI’A COMMUNITY: THE FAMILY STRANGER ................................. 38 1.2 DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION IN
    [Show full text]
  • Tito's Yugoslavia
    The Search for a Communist Legitimacy: Tito's Yugoslavia Author: Robert Edward Niebuhr Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1953 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2008 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of History THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA a dissertation by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE ABSTRACT . iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . v NOTE ON TRANSLATIONS AND TERMS . vi INTRODUCTION . 1 1 A STRUGGLE FOR THE HEARTS AND MINDS: IDEOLOGY AND YUGOSLAVIA’S THIRD WAY TO PARADISE . 26 2 NONALIGNMENT: YUGOSLAVIA’S ANSWER TO BLOC POLITICS . 74 3 POLITICS OF FEAR AND TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE . 133 4 TITO’S TWILIGHT AND THE FEAR OF UNRAVELING . 180 5 CONCLUSION: YUGOSLAVIA AND THE LEGACY OF THE COLD WAR . 245 EPILOGUE: THE TRIUMPH OF FEAR. 254 APPENDIX A: LIST OF KEY LCY OFFICIALS, 1958 . 272 APPENDIX B: ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF JNA, 1963 . 274 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 275 INDEX . 289 © copyright by ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR 2008 iii ABSTRACT THE SEARCH FOR A COMMUNIST LEGITIMACY: TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA ROBERT EDWARD NIEBUHR Supervised by Larry Wolff Titoist Yugoslavia—the multiethnic state rising out of the chaos of World War II—is a particularly interesting setting to examine the integrity of the modern nation-state and, more specifically, the viability of a distinctly multi-ethnic nation-building project.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Revolutions at the Crossroad
    www.thecommunists.net No. 33 March 2015 Arab Revolutions at the crossroad Price: €5 / $7 / £4,5 2 Contents RevCom#33 I March 2015 Revolutionary Communism No. 33, March 2015 Revolutionary Unity to Advance the Struggle for Liberation! p.3 General Sisi, Hollande, Obama: Hands Off Libya! p.6 Israel: Ten Years of Struggle against the Theft of Bil’in’s Land p.10 Elections in the shadow of a coming Intifada p.13 Egypt: Down with the Military Dictatorship! Report from protest (Vienna) p.14 For Women’s Liberation - against Imperialism! p.15 The Minsk Agreement and the Civil War in the Ukraine p.18 Greece: No to the Surrender of the SYRIZA Leadership! p.22 Freedom and Self-Determination for Kosova! p.24 Austria: Solidarity Campaign with Muslim Migrants Attracts Wide Attention p.26 Resignation from Socialist Fight (Britain) and Joining the RCIT p.27 Liberation Struggles and Imperialist Interference p.30 Soviet Constructivism – The Revolutionary Development Of Artists p.42 Socialist Realism, Soviet Art and Stalinism - A Marxist Critique p.44 RCIT Publications on Russian Imperialism p.29 NEW BOOK: Building the Revolutionary Party p.9 Books from the RCIT p.44 RCIT: What do we stand for p. 47 Published by the Revolutionary Communist International Tendency (RCIT). The RCIT has sections in Pakistan (Revo- lutionary Workers Organisation, RWO), Sri Lanka (United Lankan Workers Party, ULWP), Brazil (Corrente Comunista Revolucionária, CCR), Israel/Occupied Palestine (Internationalist Socialist League, ISL), USA (Revolutionary Workers Collective, RWC), and Austria (Revolutionary Communist Organisation for Liberation, RKOB). In addition the RCIT is collaborating with socialists in Yemen and Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Foreign Policy Towards the Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Region, 1949-1999
    Durham E-Theses China's foreign policy towards the gulf and Arabian Peninsula region, 1949-1999 Binhuwaidin, Mohamed Mousa Mohamed Ali How to cite: Binhuwaidin, Mohamed Mousa Mohamed Ali (2001) China's foreign policy towards the gulf and Arabian Peninsula region, 1949-1999, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4947/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 CHINA'S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARDS THE GULF AND ARABIAN PENINSULA REGION, 1949-1999 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should i)e published in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately. BY MOHAMED MOUSA MOHAMED ALIBINHUWAIDIN A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE FACULITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM C.M.E.I.S 2001 1'.
    [Show full text]
  • 53827 Public Disclosure Authorized
    53827 Public Disclosure Authorized SOCIALIST ECONOMIES UNIT • COUNTRY ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT • THE WORLD BANK Conference on Privatization and Ownership in Eastern and Central Europe n June 1:(-14 a conference on Indicative of the wide range of op­ sides by advocating particular options, Public Disclosure Authorized privatization and ownership tions discussed was the paper pre­ but rather pointed out the reasons O changes in Eastern and Cen­ pared by two World Bank economists behind the positions. The essence of tral Europe took place in Washington, Farid Dhanji ofEM4CO and Branko their paper is provided below. organized by thE: European Depart­ Milanovic of CECSE. They offered ment of the World Bank and funded an exploration of the environment The plethora of divestiture options by the Research Committee of the for divestiture in Eastern and Central does not simplify choice. From an Bank. Those attending included Europe and examined the advan­ individual perspective the choice of a prominent academics and tagesJdisadval!tages of the many preferred model will vary depending policymakers from each Eastern and "models" of ownership change under on the weight given to possible objec­ Central Europelln country, partici­ discussion. The authors did not take tives and the appreciation {or dis- pants from othey' countries and from the GECD and E]~C Commission. The agenda consisted ofar. overview of the conceptual issue~:, ofpdvatization and What's inside... a review of possible ,trategies. This Public Disclosure Authorized was followed by cDuntl"ypresentations The Road to a Free Economy The Bank'. Eastern and Central from Hun !;ary , Pola'ld, Yugoslavia, European Program Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Yemeni Civil War: Causes, Consequences and Prospects
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Jurnal Universitas Abdurrab Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan Vol.2, No. 2 (Agustus 2019) Hal. 82-91 YEMENI CIVIL WAR: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND PROSPECTS Niaz Ahmed PhD Scholar, Centre for West Asian Studies Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India [email protected] Abstract Yemeni conflict reflects the failure of the Yemeni government to address the common needs to its citizen, the uprising of politically marginalized Houthis and the corrupt state, which bring the country into civil war. This article is an attempt to know the causes, consequences, and the role of foreign powers and also the entire situation of Yemeni civil war. Yemen is the poorest Arab country in the world. Due to the effect of the Arab Socialist Movement, Yemen’s Imamate ruling system disintegrated in 1970 and the country divided into two nations, North Yemen and South Yemen. Again in 1990 under the leadership of Ali Abdullah Saleh, both have been united into one nation. The corrupt rule of government, the unhealthy treatment of Houthi minority and the internal conflict made the country more unstable. Political transition happed in 2011 for the stabilization of the country, but it fails to bring peace and finally in 2015 Yemen faces a devastating civil war. Different attempts have been taken by the international community for normalizing the conflict, but all fail to bring peace. The country is suffering the worst humanitarian crisis. Saudi Arabia and Iran is the main player in the conflict. This qualitative study will try to highlight the different scenario of Yemen and also provide an overview of the civil conflict.
    [Show full text]