DOCSLIB.ORG

Mayor's Report to the Assembly, \(Date of Meeting\)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mayor's Report to the Assembly, \(Date of Meeting\) Item 03 Appendix A Mayor’s Report to the Assembly, 25th February 2004 Background Document – List of Decisions recorded between 8 January 2004 to 11 February 2004 Ref Decision Date Approved by Policy Director/ Financial Implications Comments Mayoral Adviser MA1332 To approve a conference at City Hall 28/1/04 Ken Livingstone Redmond O’Neill The cost of £32,000 will be for representatives of the Irish met from the Project community in London –proposed Development Fund date April 2004 MA1367 To approve the award of £50,000 by 27/1/04 Ken Livingstone Lee Jasper The cost of £50,000 will be way of funding to the Black met from the Stakeholder Londoners Forum in 2003/04 and budget authorise the funding agreement Item 03 Appendix A MA1426 To approve: 14/1/04 Ken Livingstone Neale Coleman The funding of £84,750 will 1. the funding of £84,750 (and an be met from the following additional £25,000 in value in budgets: kind benefits) to a UK Athletics • a virement of £45,000 flagship event, LONDON Grand from the P&P directorate Prix, to be held at Crystal Palace to the Marketing budget on 30 July 2004. The funding will within the Chief be provided to Fast Track Events Executive Overall budget. Ltd, a sports marketing agency • £15,250 from the who organise all athletics events Marketing budget on behalf of UK athletics. (Note • £4,500 from the Mayor’s that the provision of the funding Event Budget. is conditional upon the venue for • £20,000 from the LDA the event being confirmed as Crystal Palace). 2. a virement of £45,000 from the Policy and Partnership Directorate to the Chief Executive’s Office (Marketing team) in 2003/04 to part fund the GLA contribution. Item 03 Appendix A MA1467 To approve: 19/1/04 Ken Livingstone John Duffy The cost of £390,500 will 1. the Project Initiation be met as follows: Document for the London Carry forward of £33,500 Development Database from 2002/03, Project, which will deliver a LDD budgets of £103,500 system capable of capturing in 2003/04 and 2004/05, and analysing the information £75,000 in 2002/03 and required to monitor the 2004/05 from the ODPM spatial development of Planning Delivery Grant. London and policies contained in the London Plan 2. the undertaking of an EU procurement process in order to select a software supplier to deliver the London Development Database 3. to note the total project budget of £390,500 and agree to adjust the 2003/04 and draft 2004/05 budgets to ensure that the full project budget is held by the Technology Group 4. the London Development Database Information Scheme for the collection of information from the London local authorities to monitor the London Plan Item 03 Appendix A MA1468 To approve: 21/1/04 Ken Livingstone Lee Jasper The cost of £35,800 will be 1. a project to provide tactile met as follows: orientation maps for London’s £20,000 Human Resources Living Room and portable £8,000 Public Liaison tactile maps of the interior of £7,800 Executive Director City Hall Corporate Services budget 2. virements of £20,000 from the Human Resources health and safety budget, £8,000 from the Public Liaison Unit’s budget and £7,800 from the Executive Director of Corporate Services consultancy fees budget to finance the project 3. the waiver of the requirements of the Contracts Code of Practice to under take a mini- tendering exercise and approves the award of the proposed contract to Ann Gardiner Item 03 Appendix A MA1507 To approve 9/2/04 Ken Livingstone Lee Jasper The total cost of the 2003 1. The timetable for the reports and the 2004 production of both the reports falling into the Mayor’s Annual Report and 2003/04 financial year is the Annual Equalities Report estimated to be £178,000, for 2004 together with their and this will be met from respective summaries; the the existing budgets for the Best Value Performance Plan Annual Report and (BVPP) GLA summary and the Equalities Reports BVPP GLA group summary (£81,000), the contingency 2. The process for the (£57,000), and virements production of the two reports from the Best Value budget 3. Virements totaling £40,000, and Finance and to cover costs associated with Performance consultancy the 2003 report and use of budget (£40,000). the contingency to cover costs associated with the 2004 report Item 03 Appendix A MA1515 To agree: 2/2/04 Ken Livingstone Decision taken at There are no direct cost 1. revisions to existing Mayor’s implications administrative and Management operational arrangements to Board improve efficiency and negotiation with contractors to achieve enhancements to the current system of Mayoral correspondence and the PLU 2. that the RTL system be reviewed in conjunction with TfL’s review of their contact points 3. clarification be sought from the Data Protection Commission on sharing information with functional bodies in respect of Mayoral correspondence and appropriate guidance be issued to staff dealing with correspondence 4. that in order to comply with the Freedom of Information legislation proposals be developed to deal with : - the Authority’s knowledge management requirements - all the Authority’s correspondence Item 03 Appendix A MA1531 To agree in principle to a transfer of 10/02/04 Ken Livingstone Eleanor Young The proposed GLA annual the TRAVL database and related contribution to the service survey programme to ALG. in 2004/05 is £10,000 and this will be met from the London Plan budget. MA1549 To approve the Mayor’s Question 27/1/04 Ken Livingstone Redmond O’Neill The cost of £20,000 will be Time for Schools and Colleges Event met from the Project – Proposed date July 2004 Development Fund MA1556 To approve the extension to the 27/1/04 Ken Livingstone John Duffy The estimated contract Heritage Warden Service Contract value for 2004/05 is with Capes UK Security Services Ltd £339,650 and will be met for a period of two years from 1 April from the Squares 2004 to 31 March 2006 Management budget Item 03 Appendix A MA1559 To approve: 27/1/04 Ken Livingstone Eleanor Young The total cost of the 1. the purchase from Landmark contract will be shared Information Group (by way of between the GLA and LDA a licence agreement) of as follows: Geographic Information GLA - £27,334 funded from System (GIS) datasets of the London Plan London wide Unitary programme budget Development Plan (“ UDP”) LDA - £27,334 land designations, including updates for the first 12 months from the date of the licence 2. that this is an exception to the Contracts Code of Practise (which would normally require an advertised tender for contracts above £50,000) because Landmark is the only supplier of this specialist services. Item 03 Appendix A MA1567 To approve: 10/02/04 Ken Livingstone Neale Coleman The draft 2004/05 1. £50,000 from the corporate corporate training budget training budget towards the includes the provision of design and delivery of a £50,000 for the management development management development programme, to commence in training programme. The July 2004 corporate training budget 2. award the contract to the will be subject to approval preferred supplier following in Feb 2004, as part of the an advertised competitive Mayor’s overall budget. tendering exercise. 3. award contract for one year with the option to extend for a further period of not more than two years. MA1572 To approve: 2/2/04 Ken Livingstone John Duffy The cost of £10,000 will be 1. a contribution of £10,000 vired from the ‘Market towards a feasibility study for Taskforce’ project within an Eco-Park at the Welsh the Environment Harp in Brent Programme budget to a 2. the reallocation of the new budget line entitled 2003/04 Environment the ‘Welsh Harp Project’. Programme budget to The ‘Market Taskforce’ transfer the £10,000 project will be deferred until allocated for ‘Market 2004/05. Taskforce’ to the ‘Welsh Harp project’ and defer the ‘Market Taskforce’ project to the 2004/05 budget Item 03 Appendix A MA1573 To agree to conduct a Children’s and 3/2/04 Ken Livingstone Murziline The cost of £35,000 will be Young People’s Survey at an Parchment met from the Public estimated cost of £35,000 Consultation (£20,000) and Children and Young People’s Programme Budget (£15,000) MA1574 To establish a scheme to recognise 3/2/04 Ken Livingstone Neale Coleman There is no specific and honour Londoners or provision in the budget to organisations within the Greater cover the costs of these London area, citizens of the UK and awards. However, the direct people of any other nationalities, costs commemorative items whose actions or achievements bring are not expected to be distinction to London and promote significant and will be met its economic, social and from existing budgets environmental development and improvement and the recognition of who’s achievements will enhance London’s reputation. The scheme will be called the “Freedom of Greater London” awards MA1576 To approve that the GLA run a 19/1/04 Ken Livingstone Mark Watts The cost of £250,000 will second promotional campaign for be met from a grant from London wide vehicle emissions the Department of testing with a total budget of Transport £250,000, provided by the Department of Transport. This will advertise the 300 MOT testing stations that have agreed to support the Mayor by offering discounted exhaust emissions checks and any necessary rectification work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections
    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Rebels As Local Leaders?
    Rebels as local leaders? The Mayoralties of Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson Compared Ben Worthy Mark Bennister The Mayoralty of London offers a powerful electoral platform but weak powers to lead a city regarded as ‘ungovernable’ (Travers 2004). This paper adapts the criteria of Hambleton and Sweeting (2004) to look at the first two Mayors’ mandate and vision, style of leadership and policies. Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson were both party rebels, mavericks and skilled media operators. However, their differences are key. As mayor, Livingstone had a powerful vision that translated into a set of clear policy aims while Johnson had a weaker more cautious approach shaped by his desire for higher office. Livingstone built coalitions but proved divisive whereas Johnson was remarkably popular. While Livingstone bought experience and skill, Johnson delegated detail to others. Both their mayoralties courted controversy and faced charges of corruption and cronyism. Both mayors used publicity to make up for weak powers. They also found themselves pushed by their powers towards transport and planning while struggling with deeper issues such as housing. In policy terms Livingstone pushed ahead with the radical congestion charge and a series of symbolic policies. Johnson was far more modest, championing cycling and revelling in the 2012 Olympics while avoiding difficult decisions. The two mayors used their office to negotiate but also challenge central government. Livingstone’s Mayoralty was a platform for personalised change-Johnson’s one for personal ambition. Directly Elected Mayors were introduced to provide local leadership, accountability and vision to UK local government. Beginning under New Labour and continued under the Coalition and Conservatives, directly elected mayors were offered initially by referendum, and later imposed, up and down the country beginning with London 2000 and then in 16 cities and towns including Bristol and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor's Report to the Assembly
    Mayor’s Report to the Assembly, 15th November 2006 Background Document – List of Decisions recorded between 5th October 2006 to 1st November 2006 Ref Decision Date Approved by Policy Director/ Financial Implications Comments Mayoral Adviser MA 2773 Approved the Air Quality Progress 30/10/06 Ken Livingstone MMB There are no direct costs to Report and its publication on the the GLA arising from this GLA website. decision. MA 2783 Agreed: 12/10/06 Ken Livingstone Anni Marjoram The estimated gross cost of this conference is £170,455 1. The seventh Capitalwoman and the net cost to the GLA conference and supporting is £50,000. The balance of conference publications on 3 £120,455 will be met from March 2007. grant income from the LDA (£60,000) and sponsorship 2. To waive the GLA’s contracts income (£60,455). code of practice to enable the conference to be held at the QEII The GLA’s net cost of Conference Centre and Central £50,000 will be met from Hall Westminster. the 2006/07 Stakeholders Programme budget. MA 2798 Approved: 05/10/06 Ken Livingstone Redmond O’Neill The gross and net cost of the additional work required 1. An amendment to the contract for this contract to the GLA approved in MA1832 for a is £5,000 and will be met by consultant to provide services in a virement from the Moscow to the International 2006/07 Strategic Projects Affairs Team to pay for & Policy Evaluation additional services to be Programme budget to the provided, with immediate effect. 2006/07 International & European Relations 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Tony Martin Dis-Invite by Ken Livingstone & Lee Jasper
    Prof. Tony Martin Dis-Invited to UK! Page 1 of 7 Dr. Tony Martin to Speak in London Just In: Report From the London Conference Prof. Tony Martin Dis- Invited to UK! Mayor's Uncle Tom Lee Jasper Does Dirty Work -- UK Blacks Protest --Ask Other Invitees Not to Attend British Blacks are outraged over the dis-invitation of the highly renowned Marcus Garvey scholar Dr. Tony Martin to a Black History Month event scheduled for October 25th in London. The event, an annual opportunity for Blacks to hear lectures from the world's top Black scholars, is arranged through the mayor's office which funds and promotes the event through its yassir-boss-negro Lee Jasper. When London Mayor Ken Livingstone was informed of Dr. Martin's uncompromising analysis of the Black/Jewish relationship (see Martin's landmark book, The Jewish Onslaught), Jasper was ordered to "dis-invite" Martin-- an order which Jasper promptly and dutifully carried out. London's Blacks, outraged by Jasper's unreserved submission, appealed to other invitees to refuse their invitations unless Martin's invitation is restored. [editor's note: Uncle Tomism has plagued the Black man for centuries. The Black Anglo-Saxon, Lee Jasper, is not the first one to buck and shimmy on behalf of Jews. Read the Open Letter to the Uncle Toms from the African United Front.] Below is an exchange of correspondence between Lee Jasper and Dr. Tony Martin, along with the international community's expressions of outrage. Dr. Martin's Response to Lee Jasper Lee Jasper's Dis-Invitation Lee Jasper's 2nd letter to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Boris Johnson Making London’S Mayor More Accountable
    Making London’s Mayor Accountable Boris Johnson Making London’s Mayor More Accountable I believe Londoners should have a greater say on how their city is run, more information on how decisions are made and details on how City Hall money is spent. Ken Livingstone presides over a budget of more than £10billion and demands £311 per year from the average taxpaying household in London. Yet Londoners have little confidence in the Mayor spending their money with care and prudence. Mayor Livingstone’s extravagant spending on publicity, his jaunts to Cuba and Venezuela at taxpayers’ expense, and the recent reports of his close advisers using their influence to manipulate the expenditure of public money have all confirmed that Ken Livingstone’s Mayoralty is unaccountable and disdainful of scrutiny. If elected, I will aim to create a different style of government at City Hall by introducing a series of measures designed to make my Mayoralty more accountable, and spending more transparent. The first of these will be the reform of People’s Question Times, open public forums where ordinary residents are able to question the Mayor and London Assembly members. Under my plans, not only will we hold these events more frequently, but we will establish question sessions that focus on myself and perhaps my Deputy too, giving Londoners the chance to question their Mayor more directly. By exercising the Mayor’s right to chair the Metropolitan Police Authority, I will take direct responsibility for tackling crime, and will be fully accountable for police performance. Local Borough Commanders will be required to hold monthly open public meetings so that local people can regularly hold their police to account.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor's Report to the Assembly, \(Date of Meeting\)
    APPENDIX A Mayor’s Report to the Assembly, 17th May 2006 Background Document – List of Decisions recorded between 9th March 2006 to 19 April 2006 Ref Decision Date Approved by Policy Director/ Financial Implications Comments Mayoral Adviser MA 2287 Agreed: 07/03/06 Ken Livingstone N/A The total contract value over three years to the GLA 1. To extend retrospectively the is £282,000 (£94,000 per existing Porterage contract from annum). the 1st November 2005 until 28th February 2006 to allow for the The Porterage service at tender period over the holiday City Hall is provided by a season. mixture of in-house staff and contracted services. 2. To appoint the successful The cost of the contracted tenderer OCS to supply services are contained Porterage services for a period of within the staffing budget three years commencing 1st for the approved staffing March 2006, with an option to establishment of 69 FTE for extend for a further two years. Facilities Management staff The value of the contract over providing porterage, three years will be £282,000. security and call centre services. Given the demands on the Security and Porterage services at City Hall it has not proved possible to contain staffing and contracted services costs APPENDIX A within the approved staffing budget which assumes the ability to maintain a 4.5% vacancy allowance based on natural turnover and makes no allowance for the level of overtime, which has proved necessary. In recognition of the pressures on the porterage service a growth bid of £85,000 was submitted and approved for the 2006/07 budget to help meet costs of this new contract.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London. Report
    A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Report of Conference at LSE 2 nd July 2010 Opening remarks of Chairman, Emeritus Professor George Jones, Chairman of the Greater London Group [GLG] This conference follows one of May 2007 held at City Hall, which had looked at the performance and demise of the Greater London Council [GLC]. Notable speakers at that event were the then Mayor, Ken Livingstone, and Lord (Desmond) Plummer, a former Conservative Leader of the GLC, who had since died. That earlier event was timed to mark the 40-year anniversary of the date when Plummer had become leader. Earlier this year L.J. [Jim] Sharpe died. He had been a research officer with the GLG in the early 1960s and had helped prepare evidence leading to the establishment of the GLC. He went on to write two pioneering GLG papers about the 1961 London County Council (LCC) Elections called A Metropolis Votes (1962) and about Research in Local Government (1965) . He remained a frequent visitor to the Group and writer about London government. I would like to dedicate this conference to Jim’s memory. The Group also lost a few days ago William Plowden who sat with me at GLG Monday afternoon meetings under the chairmanship of William Robson when I first joined the Group in 1966. Today’s conference is timely since the vesting day of the Greater London Authority [GLA], when it came into being, is ten years ago tomorrow. The objective of the conference is to assess the performance of the Mayor and Assembly that make up the GLA, looking at why and how it came into being, its achievements and disappointments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayoralties of Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Rebels Leading London: The Mayoralties of Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson Compared This article compares the mayoralties of the first two directly elected Mayors of London, Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson. The position offers a commanding electoral platform, but weak powers to lead a city regarded as ‘ungovernable’ (Travers 2004).The two mayors had some obvious points of comparison: both were party rebels, mavericks and skilled media operators. Both also used publicity to make up for weak powers, but courted controversy and faced charges of corruption and cronyism. Utilising Hambleton and Sweeting (2004), this article compares their mayoralties in terms of vision, leadership style and policies. Livingstone had a powerful vision that translated into clear policy aims while Johnson was more cautious, shaped by a desire for higher office. In terms of style, Livingstone built coalitions but proved divisive whereas Johnson retained remarkable levels of popularity. Where Livingstone bought experience and skill, Johnson delegated. In policy terms, the two mayors found themselves pushed by their institutional powers towards transport and planning while struggling with deeper issues such as housing. Livingstone introduced the radical congestion charge and a series of symbolic policies. Johnson was far more modest – championing cycling, the 2012 Olympics and avoiding difficult decisions. The two used their office to negotiate, but also challenge, central government. Livingstone’s rebel mayoralty was a platform for personalised change, Johnson’s one for personal ambition. Keywords: Mayors, political leadership, London, comparative, Boris Johnson, Ken Livingstone 1 Directly-elected mayors were introduced to bring new leadership, accountability and vision to English local government.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Ken Livingstone
    16 November 1981 Marxism Today County Hall, London: home of the Greater London Council Interview with Ken Livingstone Interviewed by Jeff Rodrigues the local authorities' senior officers and with establishing a superior and Ken Livingstone was born in 1945 and went to Tulse Hill Compre- decisive role for the elected representatives. hensive school in Brixton. He worked for eight years as a medical Do you share this concern? technician at a research institute and subsequently did a three year course at the Phillippa Fawcett teacher training college. I think it's a mistake to make a comparison between Lambeth and He became a Lambeth councillor in 1971 and served for seven the GLC. The big additional resource which we have, and they years. In 1978 he became a councillor for the London Borough of don't, is that we've got sixteen members who are virtually full time Camden. But in 1973 he also became a GLC councillor and he has here, and who operate in much the same way as an executive body carried that job on a full time basis ever since. itself, whereas in Lambeth there are only really three members who Following the Labour victory at the GLC elections in May 1981, are full time. We have overlaid the officer structure with our own he became Leader of the Labour Group. member level structure. Also, the Labour Group meets every week, He joined the Labour Party in 1968. He has been a member of unlike Lambeth's six week cycle, and every decision as it arises goes ASTMS and NUT and is currently in the Transport and General through the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayor's Climate Change Action Plan
    Greater London Authority February 2007 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA Enquiries 020 7983 4100 Minicom 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk ISBN 978 1 85261 997 8 Copies of the main report and further copies of this document are available from www.london.gov.uk or by calling 020 7983 4100. Further information is available from http://www.london.gov.uk/londonissues/environment.jsp This document is printed on Revive Silk - 100 per cent de-inked post consumer waste paper. Foreword by Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London It is almost impossible to exaggerate the danger of climate change. I have no doubt that it is the single biggest threat to the future development of human civilisation. When scientists talk of the threat of catastrophic climate change they don’t just mean the inconvenience of extra flooding or the Tube being unbearably hot in summer. If no action is taken to cut carbon emissions we face temperature rises of over five degrees towards the end of this century. It took a temperature drop of just five degrees to cause the last ice-age, so the impact of a temperature increase of the same level would be profound. The map of the world would be changed beyond recognition as sea levels rise, and hundreds of millions of people would be displaced by drought, starvation and the increased ferocity of extreme weather events. © Liane Harris Collectively, we have been complacent about global warming for far too long. It is 10 years since the Kyoto Protocol was signed and still global carbon emissions continue to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the UK
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Antisemitism in the UK Tenth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 October 2016 HC 136 Published on 16 October 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership James Berry MP (Conservative, Kingston and Surbiton) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Nusrat Ghani MP (Conservative, Wealden) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) (Interim Chair) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) Mr Chuka Umunna MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) [Victoria Atkins has been appointed to a Government post and is taking no further part in Committee activities. She will be formally discharged from the Committee by a Motion of the House, and a replacement appointed, in due course] The following were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Keir Starmer MP (Labour, Holborn and St Pancras) Anna Turley MP (Labour (Co-op), Redcar) Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Over to You Mr Johnson
    Observatoire de la société britannique 11 (2011) Londres : capitale internationale, multiculturelle et olympique ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Timothy Whitton Over to you Mr Johnson ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Avertissement Le contenu de ce site relève de la législation française sur la propriété intellectuelle et est la propriété exclusive de l'éditeur. Les œuvres figurant sur ce site peuvent être consultées et reproduites sur un support papier ou numérique sous réserve qu'elles soient strictement réservées à un usage soit personnel, soit scientifique ou pédagogique excluant toute exploitation commerciale. La reproduction devra obligatoirement mentionner l'éditeur, le nom de la revue, l'auteur et la référence du document. Toute autre reproduction est interdite sauf accord préalable de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Revues.org est un portail de revues en sciences humaines et sociales développé par le Cléo, Centre pour l'édition électronique ouverte (CNRS, EHESS, UP, UAPV). ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]