A VEDIC READER .BY TtIE SAME AUI'IIO_R IJNIFORbl WITH TItE PRI-_SENT WORK A VEDIC GRAMMAR FOR STUDENTS Including a chapter on Syntax and three Appendices : List of Verbs, Metre, Accent A VEDIC READER FOR STUDENTS BY ARTHUR ANTHONY MACDONELL M.A., ProD. BODEN PROFESSOR OF SANSKRIT FELLOW OF BAI,LIOL COLLEGE ; YELLOW OF TIIE BR1TISII ACADEblY FELLOW OY 'J_IE ROYAL DANISH ACAI)E,MY CONTAINING THIRTY HYMNS OF THE RIGVEDA IN THE ORIGINAL SAMHIT_- AND PADA TEXTS, WITH TRANSLITERATION, TRANSLATION, EXPLANATORY NOTES, INTRODUCTION, VOCABULARY OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1917 L'OHCORDIATHEOLOGICAL$[HIHARYLIBRARY iT. WAYNE, INDIANA 46825 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE CAPE TOWN BOMBAY HUMPHREY MILFORD I'UBLISHERTOTHE UNIYE_ITY PRINTEDIN ENGLAND_ PREFACE THis Reader is meant to be a companion volume to my Vedic G-rammar for Students. It contains thirty hymns comprising just under 300 stanzas. These hymns have been taken exclusively from the Rigveda, not only because that Veda represents tile earliest and most important phase of the sacred language and literature of India, but because the addition of specimens from the later Vedic literature with their divergences in speech and thought would tend to confuse the learner beginning the study of the oldest period. All the books of the Rigveda have been drawn upon except the ni,_th. The reason of this exception is that, though the whole of the ninth book practically consists of hymns addressed to Soma only, the hymn which in my opinion represents that deity best occurs in another (the eighth) book. All the most important metres are represented, though no specimens of the rare and complex strophic measures could be given because none of the hymns composed in them seemed to be suitable for the Reader. I have also considered literary merit as far as possible in making the selection. As regards subject-matter, each of the more important deities is represented by one hymn, Agni alone by two. There are besides a few hymns of a different type. One is concerned with social life (x. 34), one with magical ideas (vii. 103), two with cosmogony (x. 90. 129), and three with eschatology (x. 14. 15. 185). The selection thus forms a brief epitome of the Rigveda, the earliest monument of Indian thought. The arrange- . ment of the hymns follows their order in the text of the Rigveda as shown, togethei, with their respective deities and subjects, in the vi PREFACE table of contents (p. ix). As the latter list is so short, the name of the deity addressed in any selected hymn can be found at once, but it also appears in its alphabetical order in the General Index. Unlike all Sanskrit and Vedic chrestomathies known to me, the present work is intended primarily for students who, while acquainted with Classical Sanskrit, are beginners of Vedic lacking the aid of a teacher with an adequate knowledge of the earliest period of the language and literature of India. It will moreover, I think, be found to contain much detailed information useful even to more advanced students. Hence difficult and obscure stanzas have never been omitted from any of the selected hymns, because the notes here afford an opportunity of illustrating the methods of critical interpre- tation (see, for instance, pages 36, 47, 139-40, 152, 166, 175). In conjunction with my Vedic Grammar for Students, the Reader aims at supplying all that is required for the complete understanding of the selections without reference to any other book. Each hymn is preceded by a special introduction describing briefly the deity or the subject with which it deals. The text of every stanza is printed in three different forms. The first is the Samhita text, in DevanagarI characters, exactly as handed down by tradition, without change or emendation. But each Pada or metrical line is printed separately so as to exhibit to the eye the versification of the stanza. Then comes on the right half of the page the traditional Pada text in which each word of the Samhita text is given separately without Sandhi, and in which compounds and certain derivatives and case- forms are analysed. This is an important addition because the Pads text, as nearly contemporary in origin with the Sazp.hits text, fur- nishes us with the earliest interpretations, within the sphere of phonetics and word-formation, of the Rigveda. Next follows the translitel_ted Sarp.hits text, in which by the removal of vowel- contractions, the resolution of semivowels, and the replacement of a, the original metre of the Rigveda is restored and, by the use of punctuation, the sense is made clearer. The translation, which follows, is close, accounting for every word of the original, and is PREFACE vii based on the critical method of interpretation. The notes furnish minute explanations of all matters concerned with grammar, metre, accent, syntax, and exegesis. The general introduction gives a concise account of the form and matter of the Rigveda, describing in outline its arrangement, its language and metre, its religion and mythology, besides the critical method here applied to the inter- pretation of its hymns. The vocabulary supplements the translation and notes by giving the derivation of every word and adding in brackets the most obvious cognates from the other Indo-European languages allied to Sanskrit, especially Avestic, Greek, Latin, and English. I have added a copious general Index for the purpose of enabling the student to utilize to the full the summary of Vedic philology which this book contains. Any one who has worked his way carefully through the pages of the l_cader ought thus to have laid a solid foundation in Vedic scholarship, and to be prepared for further studies on independent lines. Freedom from serious misprints is a matter of great importance in a book like this. Such freedom has, I trust, been achieved by the aid of my two friends, Dr. James Morison, Librarian of the Indian Institute, and my former pupil, Dr. A. Berriedale Keith, Regius Professor of Sanskrit and Comparative Philology in the University of Edinburgh. In the com_e of this obliging task Prof. Keith has supplied me with a number of suggestions, the adoption of which has undoubtedly improved the notes in many points of detail. _ALLIOI. COLLEGE_ OXFORD. Oclober,1917. CONTENTS PAGES PREFACE . v INTRODUCTION . Xl--XXXi VEDIC HYMNS . 1-219 Agni i. 1 1-10 Savitr . i. 35 10-21 Marut_ i. 85 21-30 Vi._.u . i. 154 30-6 Dy_v_p.rthivi i. 160 36-41 Indra . ii. 12 41-56 Rudra . ii. 33 56-67 Ap_.m nap_t, ii. 35 67-78 Mitru . iii.59 78-83 Brhaspati iv. 50 83-92 U.sas iv. 51 92-9 Agnl v. 11 100-4 Parjanya v. 83 104-11 P_s.an . vi. 54 111-15 Apas vii. 49 115-18 Mitr_-Varun. _ vii. 61 118-24 S_rya . vii. 63 124-28 A_vin_ vii. 71 128-34 Varun.a vii. 86 134-41 Man..d_k_s vii. 103 141-7 Vi_ve dev_s . viii. 29 147-52 Soma . viii. 48 152-64 Funeral Hymn x. 14 164-75 Pitaras x. 15 176-86 x CONTENTS PAGES Gambler x. 34 186--95 Purusa x. 90 195-203 R_tri . x. 127 203-7 Hymn of Creation x. 129 207-11 Yama . x. 135 212-16 V_t_ x. 168 216-19 VOCABULARY 221-56 GENERAL INDEX 257-63 INTRODUCTION 1. AQ_ OF THE RI_VEDA. TH_ Rigveda is undoubtedly the oldest literal T monument of the Indo-European languages. But the exact period when the'hymns were composed is a matter of conjecture. All that we can say with any approach to certainty is that the eldest of them cannot date from later than the thirteenth century B.c. This assertion is based on the following grounds. Buddhism, which began to spread in India about 500 B.C., presupposes the existence not only of the Vedas, but also of the intervening literature of the Brahmanas and Upanishads. The development of language and religious thought apparent in the extensive literature of the successive phases of these two Vedic periods renders it necessary to postulate the lapse of seven or eight centuries to account for the gradual changes, linguistic, religious, social, and political, that this literature displays. On astronomical grounds, one Sanskrit scholar has (cf. p. 146) concluded that the oldest Vedic hymns date from 3000 B.C., while another puts them as far back as 6000 B.C. These calculations are based on the assumption that the early Indians possessed an exact astronomical knowledge of the sun's course such as there is no evidence, or even probability, that they actually possessed. On the oth'er hand, the possibility of such exhume antiquity seems to be disproved by the relationship of the hymns of the Rigveda to the oldest part of the Avesta, which can hardly date earlier than from about 800 B.c. That relationship is so close that the language of the .&vesta, if it were known at a stage some five centuries earlier, could scarcely have differed at all from that of the Rigveda. Hence the Indians could not have separated from the Iranians much sooner than 1300 n.c. But, according to Prof. Jaeobi, the separation took place before 4500 13.c. In that case we must assume that the Iranian and the xii AGE OF THE RIGVEDA Indian languages remained practically unchanged for the truly immense period of over 3000 years. We must thus rest content with the moderate estimate of the thirteenth century B.C. as the approximate date for the beginning of the Rigvedlc period.