University of California Santa Cruz Anxious Assumptions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ ANXIOUS ASSUMPTIONS: ANXIETY, EXPERIENCE, AND LITERARY REPRESENTATION IN MODERNITY A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in LITERATURE by Brian Clack March 2017 The Thesis of Brian Clack is approved: __________________________ Professor Dorian Bell, Chair __________________________ Professor Richard Terdiman __________________________ Professor Vilashini Cooppan __________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Brian Clack 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract v Introduction 1 Section One The Etiology of Modernity’s Anxiety 9 Section Two The Experience of Modernity, its Metaphors, and the Site of Anxiety 37 Section Three Zola’s Volatile Representations and Engagement with Empty(ied) Space 83 Bibliography 121 iii iv ABSTRACT Brian Clack Anxious Assumptions: Anxiety, Experience, and Literary Representation in Modernity This thesis explores the intersections of anxiety, experience, and literary representation in modernity, with a focus on the late nineteenth century. Anxiety is traditionally thought to be the catalyst for and subject of modern literature. This assumption is frequently made with minimal consideration for the nature of anxiety or the material experience that gives rise to it. This thesis explores the etiology of anxiety and resituates its unique presence in modernity within a dialectical framework. I use this framework to reconsider political and economic experience in Europe during the nineteenth century and its relationship with anxiety. I argue for a new conception, volatility of experience, which better captures the plurality of movement during this time. In section three, I use this conceptualization to consider two works of Émile Zola’s Rougon-Macquart and how these texts represent volatility while attempting to manage its resulting anxiety through the incorporation of colonial space. v vi INTRODUCTION Anxiety animates the modern fictional narrative. It is both the catalyst for and primary subject of a wide variety of literary output. In Useful Fictions, Michael Austin makes this connection simply: “humans think largely in narratives… so our anxiety always has a narrative component. Therefore, so must its resolution” (xv). In his work on mythic literary structures, Claude Lévi-Strauss argues that the purpose of ancient myth was to provide “a logical model capable of overcoming a contradiction (an impossible achievement if, as it happens, the contradiction is real)” – another form of anxiety management to be sure (229). While structurally different from myth, the modern novel has taken up myth’s underlying project in more complex and comprehensive ways. This effort is timely because modernity is thought to be the most anxious epoch in human history – as the title of W.H. Auden’s famous eclogue makes clear, modernity is nothing less than the age of anxiety. The novel’s apprehensions of anxiety are vast and varied. Narrative structures can engage with human experience in more or less direct ways, but in every instance some level of engagement with human experience is present in the text. Jonathan Culler comments: “literature takes as its subject all human experience, and particularly the ordering, interpreting, and articulating of experience…” (10). In other words, the fictional text is derived from experience while also taking an active role in shaping that experience. Similar to other social discourses of modernity, the modern novel participates in an accelerating process of reflexivity, to use Anthony 1 Giddens’ term.1 Despite this dialectical relationship, contemporary literary critique too often begins and ends with the aesthetic object. Interpretations of fiction that lay claim to the representation of human experience are informed by unexplained (and possibly unexamined) assumptions specific to the theorist or to the field of literary criticism more generally. In these instances, the text becomes a means to represent experience without sufficiently accounting for the experiential foundation critical to the very representations the text may explore. I find this approach to be particularly problematic in the assessments of many late nineteenth and early twentieth century literature texts. These texts are pre-diagnosed by the literary critic – modern anxiety is assumed to animate them without a corresponding inquiry into the nature of collective social anxiety and the historical experience that may have given rise to their creation. This thesis attempts to avoid this pitfall. I will engage with certain literary texts of the late nineteenth century only after an exploration of the etiological basis for social anxiety and the changing nature of experience concurrent with their production. My intention is not to tear down or deconstruct the trope of modern anxiety, so much as to reconstruct the basis for its existence in a way that might lead to fresh insights. The following questions will serve as a guide: How should collective social anxiety be defined and what temporal framework is best suited for understanding its etiology? Have certain forms of social commentary about anxiety, particularly those focusing 1 Giddens defines reflexivity as a process in which thought and action are refracted back upon one another. For Giddens, the speed of this process is constantly increasing in modernity and the limitations on possibilities of experience inscribed by past traditions are increasingly weakened. See The Consequences of Modernity (36-9). 2 exclusively on the loss of a particular object, limited our ability to comprehend its past and present affect? How should the changing nature of material experience in late nineteenth century Europe be conceptualized so as to best understand its implications on social expectations for the future? In what ways have certain iconic metaphors of modernity served to limit contemporary understandings of the affect of experience during the late nineteenth century? How effectively are expectations for the future understood and managed by collective identity and the social institutions that represent them? These questions form the basis for the first two sections of this thesis. In the third and final section, I will apply conceptualizations of anxiety and modern experience developed in the first two sections to several works of Émile Zola’s Rougon-Macquart. In section one, I explore the etiological basis for the affect of anxiety and attempt to create a framework through which modern experience might be better understood. Despite a multiplicity of contemporary and historical meanings, no affective aspect of modernity is spoken of more apodictically than anxiety. Modern anxiety might be something akin to cosmology’s dark matter – invisible and un-measurable but of whose existence we have no doubt. An exploration of psychoanalytic inquiries into anxiety does provide some consistency regarding anxiety’s temporal and relational nature. The affect of anxiety resides in the present, but it is generated by presumptions of a threatening future.2 Despite this consistency, anxiety in social 2 Given contemporary debates regarding the meaning of affect (as opposed to emotion), I should note that I use the term affect in this thesis to indicate bodily or collective social feelings that are lacking a 3 commentary is too often fixated on the loss of a particular object or way of life (often described as a loss of intrinsic meaning or realness). Commentary like this is typically followed by a call for a return to the past as a solution to present anxieties. These reclamation projects are often flawed given their failure to consider the particular ways in which this lost way of life informed a social identity effective at managing future expectations at that time. In other words, the dialectical relationship between social identity and collective expectations for future experience is critical to the understanding of collective social anxiety. In section two, I consider material experience in nineteenth century Europe and how we represent this experience in contemporary discourse. I approach my evaluation through the lens developed in section one, which I also supplement with the work of Reinhart Koselleck. His belief that the affect of time “is bound up with social and political actions” makes his theorizations particularly useful to my temporal framework for anxiety. When we consider a number of theoretical assessments of the nature of experience in modernity, two themes emerge: the initiation of change and the acceleration of experience. For the theorists who advance these assessments, modernity represents the moment in which the shackles of tradition are broken and the principles of historia magistra vitae become ineffective. Once initiated, the rate of change is thought to be in a constant state of acceleration. specific underlying object. In this regard, I broadly follow the work of Fredric Jameson and Rei Terada – see Jameson’s The Antinomies of Realism (32). 4 These themes are often communicated in contemporary discourse in figurative ways that obscure the full nature of modern experience. I identify two metaphors that have had a disproportionate effect, both having risen to the status of privileged signifier: modernity as a new state of matter (based in part on Marx’s famous comment in The Communist Manifesto that “all that is solid melts into air”); and modernity as that technological icon of the nineteenth century, the railway train. These metaphors