DOCSLIB.ORG

Triumph of Strategic Partnership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triumph of Strategic Partnership READ INSIDE: SOLID TOWNS ADVANTAGES FOR SHIPBUILDERS Russian shipbuilders USC innovative housing on the world market program has started № 4 (17) 2013 FEATURE ONE: TRIUMPH OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP Dear readers! The key feature in this issue of the United Ship- building Corporation’s magazine is dedicated to the event which is symbolic for Russia, India and world’s shipbuilding as a whole — the transfer of the Vikramaditya aircraft carrier to the customer. The significance of this unique project for our countries is discussed by its main participants, including vice-president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Igor Ponamaryov, deputy director gen- eral of JSC Rosoboronexport Viktor Komardin, heads of core departments of Sevmash, dedicated design bureaus and partner enterprises. The feature articles go together well with materials covering other priority topics of our foreign military technical cooperation in the naval domain. Rec- ognised leaders in different segments of the world naval market – the Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering, Almaz Central Marine De- sign Bureau, Severnoye Design Bureau, Zvezdochka Ship Repair Center, — share their experience and future plans. The magazine also publishes fragments of a new chapter from the re- edition (to appear soon) of the memoirs written by Alexander Terenov, a well-known submariner who participated in the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines of two generations to the Indian Navy. It also runs an article about a corporate housing construction programme of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, one of the largest initiatives of this kind in the Russian defence industrial complex, which will interest both present-day shipbuilders and their successors who will continue to fulfil the mission of building Russia’s Navy in the coming decades. Among the latter one will undoubtedly find characters of the closing article about the boat model-making laboratory of the Moscow Children and Youth City Palace, its enthusiasts and their plans deserving of all support. I wish you all good health, great successes and prosperity in 2014. Vladimir Shmakov President, JSC United Shipbuilding Corporation CONTENT 28 42 20 12 48 4_ SOLID ADVANTAGES 28_ AHEAD OF ITS TIME 48_ TOWNS FOR SHIPBUILDERS The interview with the USC Leading Russian submarine Large-scale construction of new Vice-President in charge of state developer improving existing comfortable housing is a major defense order (SDO) and military- submarine projects incentive designed to attract young technical cooperation (MTC) professionals to one of the key Igor PONOMAREV 34_ PARTNERS FOR CENTURIES sectors of defense industry Zvezdochka Ship Repair Center 12_ GOOD LUCK TO YOU, develops and improves 52_ A FREE PASS TO FUTURE VIKRAMADITYA! the close strategic relationship with The Moscow City Children’s (Youth) Triumph India Creativity Center of strategic partnership is ready to become the initial 38_ BY COMBINED EFFORTS platform for training 20_ WINGED POWER: faster THAN Experience and prospects of would-be shipbuilders SOUND, RIGHT ON target for cooperation between SPKB Ultramodern MiGs are the main and Indian Navy 56_ ISSUE WATCH combat power of the new aircraft carrier 42_ AVATAR: DIVINE Incarnation The home country for the legendary captain is on the way to building nuclear-powered Nautiluses «USC. STRENGTH Address e-mail: [email protected] AND POWER AT SEA» magazine 11/1 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, website: www.oaoosk.ru №4(17) 2013 Moscow,123242 Russia Published by USC JSС Tel.: +7 (495) 617-33 00 Fax: +7 (495) 617-34 00 President of USC — Vladimir Shmakov Remarks by President of USC rine will be floated off the oldest Rus- Vladimir Shmakov at the launching sian shipyard, which people in the Black ceremony of the Novorossiysk diesel Sea Fleet are so eager to get.” submarine (Project 636): I am glad it will be a whole range of low noise submarines, carrying powerful “It is a special day for people in Ad- missile and torpedo systems, sophis- miralty shipyards, designers in Rubin, ticated radio and sonar systems. The everyone in USC and representatives of new combat boats of Project 636 will the Navy. Today we are floating out the substantially boost the potential of the lead boat of Project 636 Novorossiysk. It Black Sea Fleet, reinforce defensive ca- is the first time in the past two decades pability and safety of Russia’s southern a modern combat, conventional subma- sea border. SHIPBUILDING HORIZONS 4 USC №4(17), 2013 SOLID ADVANTAGES Russian SHIPBUILDERS ON THE Global MARKET The interview with the USC Vice-President in charge of state defense order (SDO) and military-technical cooperation (MTC) Igor PONOMAREV r. Ponomarev, For example, Project 877EKM submarines, you are prob- which excellently proved themselves in the cus- - ably the first tomer’s navy, and Project 636 subs with the Club М vice president missile system, designed to attack ground and in USC’s history surface targets, were sold at that time. One can who supervises both SDO and MTC areas, i.e. also recall the Project 11356 frigate featuring domestic and export sectors. What are the ben- new technology, which excellently passed sea efits of such integration and its “pitfalls”? trials. That’s why export can safely be called a — Let’s start with the fact that we exported major factor of supporting the shipbuilding in- ships that had undergone testing in our Navy dustry in that period. back in the Soviet era. Then, when the Russian period arrived, we stopped building follow-on The main objective ships for our Navy and were forced to switch of the Corporation — precisely over to export orders. Export became a com- « the SDO & MTC division — is to apply ponent that maintained the domestic defense the achievements we have gained industry’s efforts to keep designing and develop- fulfilling the RF Ministry of Defense’s ing new weapons systems... orders and introduce them into — And preserving the capacity. the export systems designed for delivery to a foreign customer. — And preserving the operating, workforce and That is to make our equipment production capacity. Between 1991 and 2000, the more competitive when promoting export orders had helped the shipbuilding industry it in external markets». stay afloat and continue to implement new designs, new technologies and improved weapons systems. USC №4(17), 2013 5 SHIPBUILDING HORIZONS goods (with respect to after-sales service) taken at the June meeting of the MTC Commission became a true step forward. This is a backbone decision that will enable an integrated structure to directly engage in services, repair, and train- ing, bypassing the state intermediary agency, which, in turn, will significantly facilitate the relationship with a foreign partner in after-sales service area. The Corporation can act here as a link between the design bureau (designer) and manufacturer, define the technical policy, which will make it possible to operate these ships throughout their life cycle. In addition, the RF Ministry of Defense was tasked to prepare pilot unified life-cycle system projects. Thus, we can normally use our SDO experience also in pro- jects involving foreign customers. Since 2004, our Navy and the Russian Minis- Project 636 large The main objective of the Corporation – pre- diesel-electric try of Defense began ordering follow-on ships. submarine cisely the SDO & MTC division – is to apply the It is clear that the technology and weapons used achievements we have gained fulfilling the RF previously for foreign customers were trans- Ministry of Defense’s orders and introduce them ferred to ships for the domestic Navy. Example: into the export systems intended for delivery to the Navy ordered improved versions of Project a foreign customer. That is to make our equip- 636 submarines and Project 11356 ships. ment more competitive in external markets. Let me explain the difference between export and state defense order. — It is this aspect I’d like to talk about in There is a legal framework governing state more detail. We have been acting in the exter- defense order that encompasses the relevant nal arms market for long, for several decades. regulations and RF Ministry of Defense’s guid- But at present we are watching budget cuts in ance documents. And there is the law govern- a number of naval powers. Competition in the ing military-technical cooperation. Specifics of export market is sharply escalating. In this working under MTC and SDO are totally differ- context, what competitive advantages do we ent. These are two totally different areas of busi- have, how do we feel at these sites? And what ness in terms of establishing commercial and should be done to strengthen the advantages industrial activities. We work according to dif- and maybe try to somehow mitigate existing ferent legislative and regulatory documents. We disadvantages? have certain regulations covering internal orders — If we take today’s ratio between the SDO and quite different ones for work under MTC. Project 12418 and MTC structures, SDO accounts for around At the same time, there are common, similar missile boat 60-70% for our enterprises (in the aggregate for and related issues. For our ships, we use the same weapons and the same equipment (we ac- tually build the same ships) which we hand over to foreign customer. We develop new export configuration certificates and offer foreign cus- tomers new ships which are under series con- struction for the Russian Navy. I think that integrating the MTC and SDO is- sues in one organizational structure will benefit. Since we are well aware of the workload of our enterprises with SDO, we can regulate export orders, redistributing them between the plants within the Corporation. The overall vision of the situation in terms of the total workload of our enterprises and design bureaus allows us to wisely distribute the workload in order to re- ceive the most lucrative contracts in the future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Connections a Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations China-Russia Relations: Navigating through the Ukraine Storm Yu Bin Wittenberg University Against the backdrop of escalating violence in Ukraine, Sino-Russian relations were on the fast track over the past four months in three broad areas: strategic coordination, economics, and mil- mil relations. This was particularly evident during President Putin’s state visit to China in late May when the two countries inked a 30-year, $400 billion gas deal after 20 years of hard negotiation. Meanwhile, the two navies were drilling off the East China Sea coast and the Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) was being held in Shanghai. Beyond this, Moscow and Beijing were instrumental in pushing the creation of the $50 billion BRICS development bank and a $100 billion reserve fund after years of frustrated waiting for a bigger voice for the developing world in the IMF and World Bank. Putin in Shanghai for state visit and more President Vladimir Putin traveled to Shanghai on May 20-21 to meet Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. This was the seventh time they have met since March 2013 when Xi assumed the presidency in China. The trip was made against a backdrop of a deepening crisis in Ukraine: 42 pro-Russian activists were killed in the Odessa fire on May 2 and pro-Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk declared independence on May 11. Four days after Putin’s China trip, the Ukrainian Army unveiled its “anti-terrorist operations,” and on July 17 Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was downed.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Review on Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System
    International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering, ISSN: 2320-2092, Volume- 5, Issue-6, Jun.-2017 http://iraj.in A BRIEF REVIEW ON ELECTROMAGNETIC AIRCRAFT LAUNCH SYSTEM 1AZEEM SINGH KAHLON, 2TAAVISHE GUPTA, 3POOJA DAHIYA, 4SUDHIR KUMAR CHATURVEDI Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India E-mail: [email protected] Abstract - This paper describes the basic design, advantages and disadvantages of an Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) for aircraft carriers of the future along with a brief comparison with traditional launch mechanisms. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the feasibility of EMALS for the next generation indigenous aircraft carrier INS Vishal. I. INTRODUCTION maneuvering. Depending on the thrust produced by the engines and weight of aircraft the length of the India has a central and strategic location in the Indian runway varies widely for different aircraft. Normal Ocean. It shares the longest coastline of 7500 runways are designed so as to accommodate the kilometers amongst other nations sharing the Indian launch for such deviation in takeoff lengths, but the Ocean. India's 80% trade is via sea routes passing scenario is different when it comes to aircraft carriers. through the Indian Ocean and 85% of its oil and gas Launch of an aircraft from a mobile platform always are imported through sea routes. Indian Ocean also requires additional systems and methods to assist the serves as the locus of important international Sea launch because the runway has to be scaled down, Lines Of Communication (SLOCs) . Development of which is only about 300 feet as compared to 5,000- India’s political structure, industrial and commercial 6,000 feet required for normal aircraft to takeoff from growth has no meaning until its shores are protected.
    [Show full text]
  • OOB of the Russian Fleet (Kommersant, 2008)
    The Entire Russian Fleet - Kommersant Moscow 21/03/08 09:18 $1 = 23.6781 RUR Moscow 28º F / -2º C €1 = 36.8739 RUR St.Petersburg 25º F / -4º C Search the Archives: >> Today is Mar. 21, 2008 11:14 AM (GMT +0300) Moscow Forum | Archive | Photo | Advertising | Subscribe | Search | PDA | RUS Politics Mar. 20, 2008 E-mail | Home The Entire Russian Fleet February 23rd is traditionally celebrated as the Soviet Army Day (now called the Homeland Defender’s Day), and few people remember that it is also the Day of Russia’s Navy. To compensate for this apparent injustice, Kommersant Vlast analytical weekly has compiled The Entire Russian Fleet directory. It is especially topical since even Russia’s Commander-in-Chief compared himself to a slave on the galleys a week ago. The directory lists all 238 battle ships and submarines of Russia’s Naval Fleet, with their board numbers, year of entering service, name and rank of their commanders. It also contains the data telling to which unit a ship or a submarine belongs. For first-class ships, there are schemes and tactic-technical characteristics. So detailed data on all Russian Navy vessels, from missile cruisers to base type trawlers, is for the first time compiled in one directory, making it unique in the range and amount of information it covers. The Entire Russian Fleet carries on the series of publications devoted to Russia’s armed forces. Vlast has already published similar directories about the Russian Army (#17-18 in 2002, #18 in 2003, and #7 in 2005) and Russia’s military bases (#19 in 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ins Vikrant) at Csl, Kochi – 12 Aug 13
    ADDRESS BY CNS LAUNCH CEREMONY OF INDIGENOUS AIRCRAFT CARRIER I (INS VIKRANT) AT CSL, KOCHI – 12 AUG 13 1. Shri AK Antony, Hon’ble Raksha Mantri, Shri GK Vasan, Hon’ble Minister for Shipping, Hon’ble Members of Parliament, Hon’ble Members of Legislative Assembly & Council, Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Naval Command, Vice Admiral Satish Soni, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Southern Naval Command, Commodore K Subramaniam, Chairman & Managing Director, Cochin Shipyard Limited, Flag Officers, Board of Directors of CSL, the proud work force of CSL, distinguished guests, members of the media, ladies and gentlemen. 2. I would at the outset like to thank the Hon’ble Raksha Mantri and the Hon’ble Minister of Shipping for their presence at this momentous occasion, which is historic not only for the Navy, but for the entire nation. I would also like to compliment the Chairman & Managing Director of Cochin Shipyard and his team for making this occasion a reality. 3. The Navy has always been conscious that designing and building warships is a strategic core capability for any country. After the first indigenous warship INS Ajay was constructed in 1960, 2 the then Prime Minister Smt Indira Gandhi, launched our first indigenous frigate INS Nilgiri in 1968. Since then we have never looked back. 4. The next significant capability achieved was in-house designing. The ships of Godavari, Brahmaputra, Delhi and Shivalik, designed by naval design teams, exemplify this niche competence/ we also constructed two conventional submarines. The valuable exposure to the technical know-how of submarine construction has helped us embark on an indigenous 30 year submarine building programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles
    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles The Chinese Navy Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Saunders, EDITED BY Yung, Swaine, PhILLIP C. SAUNderS, ChrISToPher YUNG, and Yang MIChAeL Swaine, ANd ANdreW NIeN-dzU YANG CeNTer For The STUdY oF ChINeSe MilitarY AffairS INSTITUTe For NATIoNAL STrATeGIC STUdIeS NatioNAL deFeNSe UNIverSITY COVER 4 SPINE 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY COVER.indd 3 COVER 1 11/29/11 12:35 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 1 11/29/11 12:37 PM 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 2 11/29/11 12:37 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang Published by National Defense University Press for the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies Washington, D.C. 2011 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 3 11/29/11 12:37 PM Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Chapter 5 was originally published as an article of the same title in Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 144–169. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Chinese Navy : expanding capabilities, evolving roles / edited by Phillip C. Saunders ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summary
    Contact Expert Group – Project Summary Project Title UK7 Dismantling of two Oscar 1 Class nuclear submarines General Information Start Date: 2003-11-21 End Date: 2004-12-31 Status: Completed Cost: 11 424 000 GBP Project Summary Russia constructed some 250 nuclear submarines; of which about 90 are Strategic type (Housing ballistic missiles) and the remainder were General Purpose (GP) type carrying torpedoes and/or cruise missiles. Since its signature of the START agreement, Russia has accepted an obligation to progressively reduce its submarine fleet, and this intention has been reinforced by the decline in funding for the Russian navy since Perestroika, which has both accelerated the withdrawal of submarines from active service, and inhibited work on defuelling and dismantling these submarines. The Strategic submarines issue has been the subject of a bilateral agreement with the US (under its Co- Operative Threat Reduction Programme) that agreed to fund the dismantling of about 30 such submarines. However, there has hitherto been no corresponding aid programme to fund the dismantling of GP submarines. Although of somewhat lower military significance, these are of high safety and environmental significance, since they are in many cases older than the Strategic submarines, and have in many cases deteriorated to the point where they can no longer be relied on to remain afloat. Although most of these older GP submarines have been withdrawn from service, many have not yet been defuelled, and the prospect of their sinking with their nuclear fuel still on board has been a matter of rising concern to Russia and its neighbours. The underlying objectives of this project are: - To undertake dismantling of two General Purpose nuclear submarines in NW Russia nominated by MINATOM and agreed by the UK DTI.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Carriers – Glug Glug Glug….. Really? Significance of Carrier Borne Airpower for India
    www.maritimeindia.org Aircraft Carriers – Glug Glug Glug….. Really? Significance of Carrier Borne Airpower for India Author: Dinesh Yadav Date: 23 July 2018 In his recent article published by the Lowy Institute, titled “Glug, Glug, Glug: India’s interest in unsinkable Aircraft Carriers”, David Brewster1, probes India’s medium term plan to develop into a three carrier fleet. Brewster cites huge costs (acquisition, maintenance and operational) and vulnerability issues attached with the Carrier Task Force (CTFs) in support of his assertion and, as an alternative, advocates the use of ‘unsinkable’ island bases as cheaper and more effective options. Dismissing flat-tops as vulnerable status symbols for India, the author recommends the deferment of INS Vishal and instead, use the freed-up capital in shoring up India’s military capabilities in the Andaman and Nicobar (A&N) and Lakshadweep island chains. India currently operates only one carrier, INS Vikramaditya (erstwhile Admiral Gorshkov of the Soviet/ Russian Navy). Whilst India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant (IAC-I) is being built by Cochin Shipyard (CSL) and is likely to be commissioned in end 20202, India has already embarked on its follow-on induction3, likely to be named as INS Vishal (IAC-II), and expected to be much larger and more potent. A three-carrier force would allow the Indian Navy to operate one CTF on each of its seaboard at all times, with the third carrier involved in refit or maintenance. Bang for Buck – Misplaced Example of Great Britain The Royal Navy currently operates4 only one Aircraft Carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth (commissioned in December 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • BEL Preparedness Is the TAKING to the HIGH SEAS Best Deterrent: Jaitley
    IMDEX ASIA SUPPLEMENT www.aeromag.in n May 2017 | Vol 11 | Issue 3 BEL Preparedness is the TAKING TO THE HIGH SEAS Best Deterrent: Jaitley and Towed Array Sonar for ships, Short-range, Medium- range and Long-Range Gun Fire Control Systems, Naval Communication Systems for intra-ship, ship-ship, ship- shore communications and Anti-Submarine Warfare System for launch of torpedoes, rockets and decoys. BEL’s journey in the field of Sonars (Sound Navigation and Ranging) commenced in 1977 when in collaboration with DRDO lab NPOL, Kochi, it manufactured the first indigenous Sonar for the Indian Navy called APSOH. Till date, BEL has produced more than 60 Sonars covering the range of underwater applications for surface ships and submarines. Defence Minister Shri Arun Jaitley with Admiral Sunil Lanba, Chief of the Naval Staff Some of the major contributions by BEL in the field of Sonars for Surface Ship projects include Hull A four-day Naval Commanders’ Mounted Sonar/Bow Mounted Sonar, Towed Array Conference was held in New Delhi from The Defence Minister lauded the Sonar and Fire Control Systems. BEL has also exported May 2. Defence Minister Shri Arun Jaitley efforts of Indian Navy in indigenisation three Hull Mounted Sonar Systems. It is noteworthy that addressed the Naval Commanders and and urged the Commanders to focus during the execution of this project, BEL, along with interacted with them along with Minister on furtherance of Domestic Expertise NPOL and industry partners, indigenised the Directing of State for Defence Dr Subhash Bhamre, building up. Gear and the Sonar Dome which were imported until Defence Secretary and other senior then.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination
    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
    [Show full text]