DOCSLIB.ORG

Jcc Iran Bg Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jcc Iran Bg Final 31ST ANNUAL HORACE MANN MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 22, 2016 JCC: IRAN IRANIAN HOSTAGE CRISIS JAMES CHANG & MEHR SURI GEORGE LOEWENSON CHAIR MODERATORS TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE SECRETARIAT 3 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR 4 COMMITTEE BACKGROUND 5 COMMITTEE PROCEDURE 6 THE IRANIAN HOSTAGE CRISIS 9 OVERVIEW OF THE TOPIC 9 HISTORY 9 CURRENT SITUATION 14 POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 17 QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER 18 POSITIONS 18 SOURCES 25 Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 2 LETTER FROM THE SECRETARIAT Dahlia Krutkovich DEAR DELEGATES, Isabella Muti Henry Shapiro Secretaries-General Welcome to Horace Mann's 31st annual Model United Nations Daniel Frackman conference, HoMMUNC XXXI! Since 1985, HoMMUNC has Maya Klaris engaged the future leaders of the world in a day full of learning, Noah Shapiro Directors-General debate, and compromise. The conference brings together intellectually curious high school and middle school students to Charles Gay Zachary Gaynor contemplate and discuss serious global concerns. We are honored Ananya Kumar-Banarjee to have inherited the responsibility of preparing this event for Livia Mann over 1000 students that will participate in HoMMUNC XXXI. William Scherr Audrey Shapiro Benjamin Shapiro Regardless of your age or experience in Model UN, we challenge Senior Executive Board you to remain engaged in the discourse of your committees and Joshua Doolan truly involve yourself in the negotiation process. Each committee Jenna Freidus Samuel Harris is comprised of an eclectic group of delegates and will address Charles Hayman and important global concern. Take this opportunity to delve deep Valerie Maier Radhika Mehta into that problem: educate yourself think innovatively to create Evan Megibow the best solutions, and lead the committee to a resolution that Jada Yang Under-Secretaries- could better the world. Through the platform of Model UN, you General will have the chance to gain invaluable skills in leadership, public speaking, and writing and will become a more globally-aware Bliss Beyer Jacqueline Lee person. As a bonus, you will meet like-minded students from Joanne Wang around the area and create lasting friendships. Under-Directors- General Horace Mann Model United Nations has played an immense role Alexander Karpf Chase Kauder in our lives over the past three years, and it has been our pleasure Alexis Megibow to organize HoMMUNC XXXI along with a dedicated senior and Ethan Parisier Mehr Suri junior staff over the past 6 months. We hope you have a fun and Senior Staff enriching experience at the conference. Mitchell Francis Aaron Thompson Sincerely, Faculty Advisors DAHLIA KRUTKOVICH, ISABELLA MUTI, AND HENRY SHAPIRO Secretaries-General HoMMUNC XXXI Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 3 LETTER FROM THE CHAIR Dahlia Krutkovich DEAR DELEGATES, Isabella Muti Henry Shapiro Secretaries-General It is my pleasure to welcome you to the JCC on the Iran Hostage Daniel Frackman Crisis of HoMMUNC XXXI. My name is Mehr Suri, and I will Maya Klaris serve as the Chair of the committee alongside my moderators, Noah Shapiro Directors-General George Loewenson and James Chang. Charles Gay Zachary Gaynor I am currently a senior at HM, and although I am President of our Ananya Kumar- school’s Model Congress team, I’ve attended quite a few MUN Banarjee conferences in the past, and am looking forward to chairing this Livia Mann William Scherr one. Aside from Model Congress, my other passions are: Soul Audrey Shapiro Cycle, pumpkin spice, and the Oklahoma City Thunder (you Benjamin Shapiro Senior Executive guess which one is actually true). Board Joshua Doolan I am really excited for HoMMUNC XXXI and am sure this Jenna Freidus committee will be a blast! Our concentration on the Iran Hostage Samuel Harris Charles Hayman Crisis is unique – although an immensely important milestone in Valerie Maier US foreign policy towards, not only Iran, but the Middle East in Radhika Mehta Evan Megibow its entirety, many high schools tend to gloss over the event. What Jada Yang makes this event particularly unique is its historical malleability, Under-Secretaries- to not only be seen as an historical landmark, but also as a General medium through which one might analyze current issues arising Bliss Beyer in the Middle East. I urge you all to not only read the background Jacqueline Lee Joanne Wang guide in its entirety (George & James worked hard on it), but also Under-Directors- to delve further into research on the topic and its repercussions. General Overall, I want this to be a fun, rewarding, and intellectual Alexander Karpf experience, and only through your own research and subsequent Chase Kauder Alexis Megibow contributions in committee, can we make this aspiration a reality. Ethan Parisier Mehr Suri Senior Staff See you in October, MEHR SURI Mitchell Francis [email protected] Aaron Thompson Faculty Advisors CHAIR, JCC: IRAN Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 4 COMMITTEE BACKGROUND This half of the joint crisis committee will focus on the Iranian side of the Iranian Hostages Crisis. A JCC works fluidly so that delegates on either side of the crisis can speak, interact, and work together through crisis notes. The main topic of debate will be how to ensure the hostages remain in Iranian custody; however, delegates are encouraged to think beyond the situation at hand and work towards a world in which the newly-minted Islamic republic of Iran holds evermore power. The committee can explore all kinds of solutions, from military actions to diplomatic agreements. Of course, delegates are encouraged to work with the other half of the joint crisis committee, if they so desire Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 5 COMMITTEE PROCEDURE address topics relevant to recent This committee will run as a crisis updates. Directives will require a set committee. The start date is April 25th, number of sponsors plus signatories in 1980, after the failure of Operation order to be accepted by the dais, which Eagle Claw so there is no need to will be specified at the beginning of the research beyond that date. Debate will first committee session. Once accepted, flow as a perpetual moderated caucus a delegate must motion for the with a speaking time specified at the legislation’s introduction. If this beginning of committee that can be motion passes, the legislation will be changed at any time through a read aloud to the committee by the procedural motion. This moderated dais. Delegates then have the right to caucus can be interrupted by passing motion for question and answer motions for unmoderated caucuses or sessions with the authors, to write and the introduction of directives. The chair introduce amendments to the directive, reserves the right to rule motions that to move into voting procedure with or she deems do not benefit the flow of without speakers for and against, or the committee dilatory in which case they committee may decide to discuss the will not be formally voted upon. There directive in moderated caucus. In terms are four main forms of legislation that of the content of directives, the goal is can written: directives, press releases, to include in detail the very specific communiques, and unilateral actions. actions that the sponsoring delegates would like the committee to take. Directives Directives are the actions taken Press Releases by the entire committee to address an Press releases are formal issue. They can be sponsored by any statements from the Iranian delegates in committee and should government (or any given news agency Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 6 that a delegate represents) that are introduction and passage, and require released to the public, often to update the approval of the committee to pass. the world on the current state of global affairs and the actions being taken by Unilateral Actions the body. The content of these Each delegate’s specific documents should be the exact text that assignment on this committee affords the sponsoring delegates would like them the ability to use their position’s released to the public. After being resources to help reach the committee’s introduced, press releases can be goals and to advance his or her own treated just like directives in terms of personal interests. In this sense, each procedure (they must be passed by the member of this committee has the committee) and debate. powers that the representative of their company, agency, or newspaper on the Communiques would have. In order to use these Communiques are the same as powers, throughout committee press releases except for the fact that delegates can pass up notes addressed the audience for a communique is one to “crisis.” These notes should contain, person or group instead of the entire very specifically, the actions that will world. In this sense, they can be be taken, whether they be a letter to a thought of as letters from the potential ally or the launching of a committee or a single person to a secret new mercenary force. Crisis person or group. They are most often notes will remain secret from all the written to solicit actions or support other delegates, and as such they are a from various significant individuals or place for creativity. Small groups of groups relating to a conflict. delegates can also combine their Communiques can be treated like press resources and write unilateral actions releases and directives in terms of their together. Note that just like all other Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 7 forms of legislation in this committee, crisis notes will impact the ongoing situation on an international level. The dais will be responding to crisis notes with updates on their progress and effects. Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference 8 THE IRANIAN HOSTAGE Crisis from the Iranian point of view.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iranian Regime and the New Political Challenge
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org June 2011 ~MIDDLE EAST MEDIA MONITOR~ AN ENEMY FROM WITHIN: THE IRANIAN REGIME AND THE NEW POLITICAL CHALLENGE By Raz Zimmt Middle East Media Monitor is an FPRI E-Note series, designed to review once a month a current topic from the perspective of the foreign language press in such countries as Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Turkey. These articles will focus on providing FPRI’s readership with an inside view on how some of the most important countries in the Middle East are covering issues of importance to the American foreign policy community. Raz Zimmt is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate School of Historical Studies and a research fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. He is the editor of the weekly “Spotlight on Iran,” published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, www.terrorism-info.org.il/site/home/default.asp . On May 11, 2011 hardliner cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, held a meeting with members of the conservative Islamic Coalition Party. Mesbah-Yazdi warned his audience against the strengthening of deviant religious thought in Iranian society. He claimed that it jeopardizes the concept of “the Guardianship of the Islamic jurist” ( Velayat-e Faqih ), upon which the Iranian regime has been based since the Islamic Revolution (1979). “If this current continues and one day we will see another Seyyed Ali Mohammad Bab 1...we should not be surprised.” 2 A few days later, Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Sa’idi, the Friday prayer leader in Qom, warned the “deviant currents” to stop their conspiracies or the people will annihilate them, as they did to [Abolhassan] Banisadr, 3 “the hypocrites” [a reference to Iranian opposition organization, the Mojahedin-e Khalq ] and “the leaders of the sedition” [a reference to the reformist opposition].
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstrations and Political System Crises in Iran
    1 DEMONSTRATIONS AND POLITICAL SYSTEM CRISES IN IRAN by Arabian Gulf Centre for Iranian Studies 4 DEMONSTRATIONS AND POLITICAL SYSTEM CRISES IN IRAN Executive Summary 28 December 2017, demonstrations ON broke out in the holy city of Mashhad, catalyzing similar demonstrations in other cities, resulting from stagnant socio-economic conditions. The spiral of events which have unfolded, resulted in the demonstrators chanting political slogans, targeting the regime, because of its abject failure in satisfying socio-economic needs and it’s foreign policy, which has burdened the regime with excessive expenditure at the expense of its own people. 5 Iran has survived multiple crises post-1979 revolution, during the first decade. After this turbulent period, the regime stabilized and was able to overcome political and military rivals. DEMONSTRATIONS This consolidation of power via the imposition of religious ideology and monopolization of political and economic choices, as well as control over foreign relations, was at the expense of AND POLITICAL SYSTEM CRISES multiple regional and international crises. In the early 1990s, a political movement started to emerge in Iran, resulting in the reformist IN IRAN current, leading to Mohammad Khatami becoming the president. Khatami was part of a hidden ploy to distribute roles within the regime, where the dispute between the reformists and conservatives was simply a disagreement between supporters of Khomeini’s Velayat-e Faqih. In fact, the actual gap between the Iranian people and the reformists did not narrow but widened and this has been apparent whether the reformists or conservatives are in power, as Iranians have failed to decipher the difference between the two when it comes to freedom, openness and jurist monopolization over law and decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Iranian Soft Power in the Arab World from Google Trends
    The Journal for Interdisciplinary Middle Eastern Studies Volume 4, Spring 2019, pp. 33-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26351/JIMES/4/2 ISSN: 2522-347X (print); 2522-6959 (online) Assessing Iranian Soft Power in the Arab World from Google Trends Hillel Frisch Abstract Iran’s hard power in Lebanon is well-known. At its beck and call are the Hezbollah militia − the powerful military force through which it largely controls the Lebanese state, the many militias operating under the umbrella of the Popular Mobilization Force in Iraq, as well as links in the Palestinian arena to al-Jihad al-Islami and to Hamas. This is hardly true of its soft power. Analyzing search results presented by Google Trends, Iran’s soft power reach seems to be limited to the states with Shi’ite populations, especially in Lebanon and Bahrain. The country’s soft power is more tenuous in Iraq, the country with a majority of Shi’ites, who also represent the majority of Arabic speaking Shi’ites. Analysis of Google Trends searches suggests that Iraq is a spiritual center competing with Iran, among the smaller Shi’ite centers of population in Lebanon and Bahrain − where Shi’ite identity seems to be the most salient. While Arabic speaking Shi’ites evince interest in Iran, the Iranian public hardly reciprocates with interest in Shi’ites in the Arab world, a reflection of a center-periphery relationship between Iran and transnational Shi’ites. Keywords: Iran, soft power, Google Trends, Shi`ites, Arab world, Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain Prof. Hillel Frisch – Bar-Ilan University, Israel; [email protected] 33 34 Hillel Frisch Introduction Iran’s hard power in Lebanon is well known.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 28, 2005
    Iran Page 1 of 20 Iran Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 28, 2005 The Islamic Republic of Iran [note 1] is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shi'a Muslim clergy dominate the key power structures. Article Four of the Constitution states that "All laws and regulations…shall be based on Islamic principles." Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty (Article Six) and the rule of the Supreme Jurisconsulate (Article Five). The unelected Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamene'i, dominates a tricameral division of power among legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Khamene'i directly controls the armed forces and exercises indirect control over the internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The executive branch was headed by President Mohammad Khatami, who won a second 4-year term in June 2001, with 77 percent of the popular vote in a multiparty election. The legislative branch featured a popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, Majlis, which develops and passes legislation, and an unelected 12-member Council of Guardians, which reviews all legislation passed by the Majlis for adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles and also has the duty of screening Majlis candidates for eligibility. Conservative candidates won a majority of seats in the February Seventh Majlis election that was widely perceived as neither free nor fair, due to the Council of Guardians' exclusion of thousands of qualified candidates. The 34-member Expediency Council is empowered to resolve legislative impasses between the Council of Guardians and the Majlis.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on the 2009 Iranian Election
    The anatomy of a crisis Perspectives on the 2009 Iranian election Issue 1, 2009 1 Created in November 2007 by students from the UK universities of Oxford, Leicester and Aberystwyth, e-International Relations (e-IR) is a hub of information and analysis on some of the key is- sues in international politics. As well as editorials contributed by students, leading academics and policy-makers, the website contains essays, diverse perspectives on global news, lecture podcasts, blogs written by some of the world’s top professors and the very latest jobs from academia, politics and international development. The pieces in this collection were published on e-International Relations during June 2009. Front page image by Hamed Saber edited and compiled by Stephen McGlinchey and Adam Groves 2 Contents 4 Introductory Notes 5 Iran’s Contested Election 10 Losing the battle for global opinion 12 Reading into Iran’s Quantum of Solace 14 Decisions Iranians should make and others should support 16 Why Iranians have to find their own course 18 The Iranian women’s rights movement and the election crisis 20 Defending the Revolution: human rights in post-election Iran 23 The 2009 Iranian elections: a nuclear timebomb? 26 Contributors 3 Introductory notes Stephen McGlinchey With the contested re-election of Mahmoud intensify Israeli fears that some kind of interven- Ahmadinejad on June 12th 2009 and the wide- tion was necessary for its own national security. spread protests that followed, domestic Iranian politics once again came to the fore internation- If reports are correct that the popular tide is ally. Not since the final days of the Shah, the turning against the regime in Iran, there is a Islamic revolution of 1979 and the ensuing hos- real danger that it will respond by pandering to tage crisis, had it occupied such a prime posi- populist fears in the country and enhancing its tion across the international political landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctica a Dream Destination Opposition Calls for Elected Govt
    NEWS SUNDAY, APRIL 13, 2014 Iran not considering alternative UN pick Continued from Page 1 Obama’s desk on Thursday. Carney did the nomination, but Araqchi’s comments not say whether Obama would eventual- yesterday appeared to indicate that such Mohammad Javad Zarif to write to UN ly sign it, but he added: “We certainly a step is not a palatable option for Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to fight share the intent of the bill passed by President Hassan Rouhani’s government. the US decision. Congress.” Aboutalebi, who currently heads The visa row poses a challenge to US The bill amends a section of the exist- Rouhani’s political affairs bureau, has President Barack Obama’s drive for a ing Foreign Relations Authorisations Act insisted he was not part of the hostage- diplomatic breakthrough and a global to allow Washington to withhold visas for taking in Nov 1979, when an Islamist stu- deal over Iran’s disputed nuclear pro- individuals who have “engaged in a ter- dent group seized the US embassy nine gram. Aboutalebi is a former ambassador rorist activity against the United States”. months after the overthrow of the pro- to Australia, Italy and Belgium. As the Carney said there was no reason to Western shah. host government, the United States is expect that the row between Tehran and Some of the former hostage takers are obliged to issue visas to diplomats who Washington over the envoy would now moderates or reformers, including serve at the United Nations. It is believed impact progress in talks between Iran Vice President for Environmental Affairs that Washington has never previously and world powers, including the United Massoumeh Ebtekar, one of three denied a visa for a UN ambassador, States, over Tehran’s nuclear activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Case File (April 2019)
    IRAN CASE FILE July 2020 RASANAH International Institute for Iranian Studies, Al-Takhassusi St. Sahafah, Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. P.O. Box: 12275 | Zip code: 11473 Contact us [email protected] +966112166696 The Executive Summary .............................................................4 Internal Affairs .........................................................................7 The Ideological File ......................................................................... 8 I. Supporters of Velayat-e Faqih and the Call to End the US Presence in Iraq .......................................................................... 8 II. Coronavirus Amid Muharram Gatherings in Najaf ............................ 9 The Political File ............................................................................12 I. The Bill to Hold Rouhani Accountable and the Conservatives’ Call for Him to Be Deposed .......................................12 II. The Supreme Leader Saves Rouhani From Interrogation and Rejects His Ouster .....................................................13 The Economic File ..........................................................................16 I. History of Economic Relations Between Iran and China .....................16 II. The Nature and Provisions of the 25-year Partnership Agreement ..... 17 III. Prospects of the Long Term Iranian-Chinese Partnership .................18 The Military File............................................................................ 20 Arab Affairs ............................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Did Economic Sanctions Cause Inequality in the US-Iran Relations?
    Did Economic Sanctions Cause Inequality in the US-Iran Relations? Agnese Macaluso 2015 Abstract Over the last three decades, relations between Iran and the United States have been dominated by hostility and economic restrictions. In the autumn of 2013, however, Iran and the P5+1 began negotiating over what was welcomed as an historical nuclear deal. After almost two years of difficult negotiations, a comprehensive agreement has now been reached, though it has not yet been ratified. The announcement triggered new optimism over the future of their relations but also doubts on the sustainability and durability of such an agreement. This paper both explores the extent to which the inequality that has characterized the relations between Iran and the US has been the cause of the deadlock, and discusses the way in which the lack of both procedural and distributive justice has hindered negotiations. The paper also discusses the implications, for the concept and perception of equality and durable peace, of pursuing an agreement by imposing economic sanctions. Did Economic Sanctions Cause Inequality in the US-Iran Relations? Agnese Macaluso Abou t the Au th or Agnese Macaluso is a Researcher in the Conflict Prevention Program of The Hague institute for Global Justice. She focuses on economic sanctions and conflict prevention and is currently involved in research projects in the field of institutions and governance and education. Ackl ow ed gem ents The author thanks Dr. Andrew Futter and Rens de Man for insightful discussions and for taking the time to provide feedback on earlier versions of this paper. The author is also grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Supreme Leadership and Presidency and Its Impact on the Political System in Iran
    Study The Relationship Between the Supreme Leadership and Presidency and Its Impact on the Political System in Iran By Dr. Motasem Sadiqallah | Researcher at the International Institute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah) Mahmoud Hamdi Abualqasim | Researcher at the International Insti- tute for Iranian Studies (Rasanah) www.rasanah-iiis.org WWW.RASANAH-IIIS.ORG Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 3 I- The Status and Role of the Supreme Leadership and the Presidency in the Iranian Political System ................................................................................. 4 II- The Problems Involving the Relationship Between the Supreme Leader and the Presidency .............................................................................................. 11 III- Applying Pressure Through Power to Dismiss the President .....................15 IV- The Implications of the Conflict Between the Supreme Leader and the Presidency on the Effectiveness of the Political System ................................. 20 V- The Future of the Relationship Between the Supreme Leader and the President ........................................................................................ 26 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 29 Disclaimer The study, including its analysis and views, solely reflects the opinions of the writers who are liable for the conclusions, statistics or mistakes contained therein
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Divided? Nima Gerami
    The Domestic Politics of Iran’s Nuclear Debate LEADERSHIP DIVIDED? NIMA GERAMI LEADERSHIP DIVIDED? The Domestic Politics of Iran’s Nuclear Debate NIMA GERAMI The Washington Institute for Near East Policy www.washingtoninstitute.org Policy Focus 134 | February 2014 The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover: Tehran newspaper headlines following signing of the Joint Plan of Action in Geneva. Design: 1000 Colors Contents Acknowledgments | v Executive Summary | vii 1. Introduction | 1 2. Limits on Iran’s Nuclear Debate: Secrecy and Self-Censorship | 3 3. Contextualizing Nuclear Decisionmaking: The Key Stakeholders | 9 4. The Political Landscape: Elite Factionalism and the Nuclear Debate | 19 5. Critical Junctures: Internal Divisions and Nuclear Policy Shifts | 31 6. Conclusion: Lessons Learned | 40 About the Author | 42 Figures Fig 1. Overview of Nuclear Decisionmaking in Iran | 11 Table 1. Formal Members of the Supreme National Security Council | 12 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, particularly Patrick Clawson, Michael Eisenstadt, and Mehdi Khalaji, for their encouragement, insights, and support during the preparation of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Candidate Screening in Iran's Parliamentary Elections, 1984-2012
    OSIPP Discussion Paper: DP-2020-E-003 The Candidate Screening in Iran’s Parliamentary Elections, 1984-2012 April 23, 2020 Tomoyo Chisaka Ph.D. student, Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP), Osaka University Research Fellow, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 【keywords】Iran’s parliamentary elections, candidate screening, the Guardian Council 【summary】 This discussion paper examines historical development of the candidate screening for Iran’s parliamentary elections from 1984 to 2012. Scholars have discussed disqualification of reformists by the Guardian Council, but little is known about to what extent the pattern of disqualification was consistent in the elections. Using various local newspapers, I identified who were disqualified at elections in a long period of time. The result shows that the Guardian Council gradually expanded the target of disqualification. In some cases even incumbents who were once allowed were later disqualified. The paper concludes that the Guardian Council played an important role in excluding those who challenge the Supreme Leader’s authority. Acknowledgment: This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 19J10368). I thank Professor Akihisa Matsuno for his guidance and comments. All errors are my own. The author's email address: [email protected] 1. Introduction1 This paper examines the Guardian Council's practice of candidate screening for parliamentary elections in Iran. Scholars have argued that candidates who seek political reform (reformists) tend to be disqualified by the Guardian Council, whose members are appointed by the Supreme Leader. Sarabi writes, for instance, “[T]he most controversial barriers are the requirement that candidates demonstrate a practical commitment to Islam and to the Islamic government and the constitutional power of the Guardian Council to supervise elections(Sarabi1994,95).” The question is to what extent the pattern of the candidate screening was consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Month of January: Intensification of Conflicts Between Different Projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS)
    Shiva Tabari February 2020 The Long month of January: intensification of conflicts between different projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS) There are moments in history, due to a myriad of events, shifts in the (e)motion of people, and simultaneity of social movements, that participants have a strange feeling of intensification of time. Any day endures as much as a week, every week appears as a month or so. It is unbelievable for people that this amount of change and events have happened only during a week or so. This amount of conflict and clash of ideas, bodies, projects should happen in several years or maybe more. Hence, if people in (so-called) Western countries like Australia, which have a relatively stable country, want to understand the everyday life of Iranians in January 2020 and learn from our experience, they have, first of all, to imagine themselves in a situation that all of the sad news they hear during some years, all of anger they feel due to misbehavior of their ruling class, all of their nightmares about another world war and losing their normal life, all their hopes and hopelessness, and also all of the social/political activities which they do during many years (demonstration, strike, signing a petition etc.), have been compacted and concentrated in a single month. I call it intensification of history. Possibly, an element of a revolutionary situation. I am sure that Iranian people had the same feeling during the September of 1941 when both the Allies and the Soviet Union invaded Iran, occupied Tehran and forcibly abdicated Reza Pahlavi and assigned his son (Mohammadreza), a puppet, as the King.
    [Show full text]