(Lythrum Salicaria) on Wetland Bird Abundances Author(S): Brian G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Impact of Exotic Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) on Wetland Bird Abundances Author(s): Brian G. Tavernia and J. Michael Reed Source: The American Midland Naturalist, 168(2):352-363. 2012. Published By: University of Notre Dame URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1674/0003-0031-168.2.352 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Am. Midl. Nat. (2012) 168:352–363 The Impact of Exotic Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) on Wetland Bird Abundances 1 BRIAN G. TAVERNIA AND J. MICHAEL REED Biology Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155 ABSTRACT.—The exotic invasive wetland plant purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) is often considered to have negative impacts on native plant and animal species, but this is debated. Clarifying its influence would provide insight into appropriate management actions following invasion. We investigated the influence of L. salicaria cover and density on abundances of wetland bird species that are associated with a variety of vegetation structures. We found evidence of relationships between L. salicaria measures and abundance for most species we examined, but these relationships did not always agree with our predictions based on species’ habitat associations. Some bird species positively responded whereas others negatively responded to increasing L. salicaria cover or density. Response curves varied in complexity and included linear and quadratic relationships as well as interactions. Our results suggested that L. salicaria did not categorically decrease habitat quality for all wetland bird species, and it may have had a positive influence on quality for some species. This ambiguity is not unique to L. salicaria invasion but applies to many changing habitat features. Therefore, there is likely no single appropriate strategy for managing L. salicaria when the goal is to maintain a diverse avian community in which species have divergent habitat preferences. INTRODUCTION Exotic invasive plants can alter the composition and structure of vegetation communities and potentially change the availability of resources (e.g., nest sites, foraging habitat) needed by breeding birds (e.g., Schmidt and Whelan, 1999; Heckscher, 2004). One such species is purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), an exotic invasive perennial wetland plant introduced to the northeastern U.S.A. and Canada from Eurasia in the 1800s; it now occurs in 48 U.S. states and nine Canadian provinces (Thompson et al., 1987; Wilson et al., 2004). The spread of exotic invasive wetland plants can be facilitated by landscape disturbances such as those associated with urbanization (Silliman and Bertness, 2004; Zedler and Kercher, 2004). Consequently, L. salicaria invasion might be one mechanism by which observed landscape changes affect wetland bird distributions (e.g., DeLuca et al., 2004; Tavernia and Reed, 2010). Although the impact of L. salicaria on wetland plant communities is debated (e.g., Anderson, 1995; Blossey et al., 2001), evidence suggests that it reduces aboveground biomass of co-occurring native plants (Farnsworth and Ellis, 2001) and shifts the structure of emergent vegetation to a more shrub-like form (Hill, 2000). Because wetland bird species differ in their preferences for different vegetation structures (Weller, 1999), changes in structure as a results of L. salicaria invasion could alter the distribution and abundance of wetland bird species. We found few published investigations that have examined effects of Lythrum salicaria invasion on wetland birds given the extent of its invasion in North America. Consequently, we tested predictions regarding the influence of L. salicaria cover and density on the breeding abundance of a suite of wetland bird species. Our predictions were based on the structure of vegetation stands typically considered habitat for these species and on 1 Corresponding author’s present address: Department of Forestry, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; e-mail: [email protected] 352 2012 TAVERNIA &REED:INVASIVE PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE AND WETLAND BIRDS 353 TABLE 1.—Models relating bird species abundances to Lythrum salicaria cover and density and a suite of additional habitat variables at 64 survey points within 30 wetlands. Habitat variables are: water depth (WD), fine-leaved emergent cover (FC), cattail cover (CC), shrub density (SHD), shrub cover (SHC), vegetation height (VH), tree and snag number (TSN), water cover (WC), L. salicaria cover (LC), and L. salicaria density (LD). The best model (DAICc 5 0) and others receiving support (DAICc # 2) are reported for each bird species. Akaike weights (wi) represent the likelihood that each candidate model is the best model among those considered. Pseudo-r2 values are reported as measures of the amount of variability explained 2 Species Model DAICc wi Pseudo-r Virginia rail 21.15 + 1.24WD 2 0.25FC + 0.34CC + 2.42WC + 1.27LD 0 0.33 0.22 20.67 + 1.12WD 2 0.65FC 2 0.07CC + 2.07WC 0.40 0.27 0.19 20.93 + 1.35WD 2 0.44FC + 0.05CC + 2.09WC + 1.09LC 1.00 0.20 0.21 21.32 + 1.07WD 2 0.07FC + 0.58CC + 2.64WC 1.56 0.15 0.24 + 1.04LD + 3.94LD*WC marsh wren 23.87 + 1.91WD + 1.94CC + 0.94VH 2 3.48WC 2 2.96LD 0 0.52 0.25 23.28 + 2.23WD + 2.13CC + 0.62VH 2 2.97WC 1.03 0.31 0.20 song sparrow 2.30 + 1.38SHD 2 0.51SHC + 0.02TSN 2 0.77VH 2 0 0.50 0.27 0.99LC + 1.01LD 2 2.58LC*LD 2.09 + 2.45SHD 2 0.63SHC + 0.004TSN 2 0.70VH 1.72 0.21 0.17 2.10 + 2.38SHD 2 0.60SHC 2 0.01TSN 2 0.71VH 2 0.44LC 1.88 0.20 0.19 swamp sparrow 3.08 + 1.90LC 0 0.52 0.07 red-winged 7.52 2 1.38SHD + 1.98SHC + 1.32CC + 4.40WC 0 0.50 0.27 blackbird 7.27 + 0.76SHD + 1.59SHC + 1.06CC + 4.27WC 1.78 0.21 0.34 + 1.79LC 2 2.34LD + 9.07LC*LD previously published results. Specifically, dense stands of vegetation may impede the movement of Virginia rails (Rallus limicola) (Conway, 1995), a relatively ambulatory species, so we expected a negative relationship between the density of L. salicaria and this species’ abundance. However, this effect may be reduced if L. salicaria stands are interspersed with a relatively open cover type, such as water pools. Consequently, with respect to Virginia rail abundance, we tested for the presence of an interaction between L. salicaria density and the cover of water pools. For marsh wrens (Cistothorus palustris), we predicted a negative linear response to increasing L. salicaria cover and density because this species typically breeds in areas with simple vertically structured vegetation (e.g., cattail) (Kroodsma and Verner, 1997). We expected the abundances of yellow warblers (Setophaga petechia), common yellowthroats (Geothlypis trichas), and song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to respond in a positive linear fashion to L. salicaria cover and density, as these species are typically associated with shrubby areas (Guzy and Ritchison, 1999; Lowther et al., 1999; Arcese et al., 2002). Hill (2000) reported a possible positive, unimodal relationship between swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana) densities and L. salicaria cover and density and suggested that L. salicaria may provide song posts and nest building opportunities. Consequently, we predicted positive, unimodal relationships between swamp sparrow abundance and Lythrum salicaria cover and density. Previous studies have reported no relationship between L. salicaria and red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) abundance or nest success (Whitt et al., 1999; Hill, 2000; Maddox and Wiedenmann, 2005), so we expected no relationship between red-winged blackbird abundance and L. salicaria cover or density. A clear understanding of how these bird species respond to L. salicaria may help to predict likely impacts of wetland invasion by L. salicaria and can inform evaluation of alternative management activities such as L. salicaria eradication vs. control. 354 THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 168(2) METHODS Study wetlands.—We conducted our study in the Greater Boston area of eastern Massachusetts (42u449 to 42u29N and from 71u289 to 70u579W). Historically, agricultural conversion and road and building construction have contributed to the loss of 58–64% of the original wetland habitat of Massachusetts. Currently, wetlands cover 6–7% of the state (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1995). Herbarium specimens suggest that Lythrum salicaria was established in Massachusetts at least as early as 1831 (Stuckey, 1980), and it now occurs throughout (Sorrie and Somers, 1999). Using aerial photographs taken in Jul. of 2007 (E Google, date accessed: 3/15/2009), we selected a subset of 94 candidate wetlands in the Greater Boston area meeting two selection criteria: (1) the wetland appeared to contain areas of emergent vegetation where Lythrum salicaria was prevalent and (2) the wetland was large enough to accommodate at least two 50-m radius bird survey points separated by a distance of 200 m. We selected sites with enough space for at least two survey points to increase the number of points that could be surveyed in a morning.