DOCSLIB.ORG

Calumet Marsh Bird Monitoring 2015-2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calumet Marsh Bird Monitoring 2015-2016 | 1 Calumet Marsh Bird Monitoring 2015-2016 Calumet Marsh Bird Monitoring 2015-2016 Prepared by Caleb Putnam, Walter Marcisz, and Nat Miller Calumet marsh bird monitors: Roberta Asher, Peter Avis, Thomas Barnes, Erin Grey, Libby Keyes, Paul Labus, Linda Magyar, Walter Marcisz, Nat Miller, Jessica Rico, Axel Rutter, Caleb Putnam, Teri Radke, Dan Spencer, Byron Tsang. Scientific advisors: Courtney Conway, Nicole Michel, Mike Monfils, Charles O’Leary, Doug Stotz, Gary Sullivan, Mike Ward, and Chad Wilsey. This project is funded in part under the Coastal Zone Management Act, by NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management in conjunction with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources’ Coastal Management Program. Indiana monitoring was funded by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. The Calumet wetland working group consists of: The Forest Preserves of Cook County, The Chicago Park District, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Audubon Great Lakes, The Wetlands Initiative, The Field Museum, The Nature Conservancy, Illinois Natural His- tory Survey and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This report was prepared by the Forest Preserve District of Cook County and Audubon Great Lakes using Federal Funds under award number NA14NOS4190081 from NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management, U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management or the U.S. Department of Commerce. Cover: American Coot. Photo: Alan Murphy CALUMET WETLANDS BIRD MONITORING Introduction The Calumet wetland working group is an informal coalition of land managers, scientists, and conservation- ists working together to restore the valuable wetlands of the Millennium Reserve in northeast Illinois. A long history of industrialization and urbanization has highly altered hydrology in the region creating threats to the long-term sustainability of wetlands and, in particu- lar, marshes, which depend on natural and dynamic water conditions. Invasive species such as common reed (Phragmites australis) and narrowleaf cattail (Typha angustifolia) further degrade marsh conditions as reflected by documented declines of the region’s marsh-dependent birds (W. Marcisz 2016). Marsh birds serve as a primary Calumet marsh complex, identified indicator of wetland quality and their based on existing hemi-marsh or charismatic nature also promotes potential hemi-marsh conditions. great public interest which serves Audubon relied on staff, partners and to raise the profile of this large col- a network of experienced volunteers laboration. This report summarizes to conduct the surveys. The surveys the result of monitoring established were conducted using the widely- in 2015 and expanded in 2016 with recognized “Standardized North the goal of documenting marsh bird American Marsh Bird Monitoring breeding populations and distri- Protocol” (Conway, 2011), developed bution to serve as a baseline for by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Survey goal-setting within the conservation as a continent-wide, standardized action planning process of the Calu- protocol for measuring breeding met wetland working group. marsh bird densities. In addition to ​​​ using this protocol, surveyors also Methodology conducted territory mapping at each During 2015, Audubon Great Lakes site with the goal of counting how organized the monitoring of ten many pairs of each focal species urban wetlands in northeastern Illi- were present. Territory mapping pro- nois. In 2016 with additional funding, vides an actual count of the numbers an additional 16 sites were added (12 of each nesting species at each site, of which were in Northwest Indiana which will serve as a baseline against and four of which were in Illinois). which future restoration efforts can Together these 26 sites represent the be gauged on a site by site basis. Yellow-crowned Night-Heron. Photo: Vaughn Cottman 4 | 5 CALUMET WETLANDS BIRD MONITORING Species (Table 2). Secondary focal species both breeding range peripheral and meadow/ditches; Marsh Wrens may or may not respond to future may be absent for reasons outside occur in Phragmites monocultures The four primary focal species for hemi-marsh restoration. Three of land managers’ control. Finally, in addition to hemi-marshes). Black- this study were selected due to their of these species are colonial or we also collected data for several crowned Night-Heron requires indication of quality hemi-marsh semi-colonial nesters not suited for additional incidental focal species suitable nesting trees (or occa- habitat. They regularly occur in territory mapping and dependent (Table 3), without producing terri- sionally tall Phragmites or cattail the region, are in the core of their on stochastic processes out of land tory maps. Some of these species stands) for its rookeries, but even breeding ranges, and respond to im- managers’ control (e.g. the presence breed primarily north of the Calu- then rookeries may not be occupied proved habitat conditions (Table 1). of suitable rookery trees). American met and others are generalists not for stochastic reasons. However, Secondary focal species are less reli- Bittern is a strong indicator of marsh requiring hemi-marsh (Blue-winged since these species use hemi-marsh able indicators of hemi-marsh due habitat quality but breeds primar- Teal nests in upland meadows adja- habitat during all or part of their life to either being range peripheral or ily north of the Calumet. Black Tern cent to marshes; Sora and Virginia cycles, they are included. Figures 1-4 extirpated colonial nesting species and Yellow-headed Blackbird are Rail occur in both marsh and wet show the four primary focal species. Table 1. Primary Focal Species. Good Moderate Poor Species hemi-marsh hemi-marsh hemi-marsh indicator indicator indicator Pied-billed Grebe (Podilymbus podiceps) ü Common Gallinule (Gallinula chloropus) ü King Rail (Rallus elegans) ü Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis) ü Fig. 1. Pied-billed Grebe. Photo: Nick Chill (used under Flickr Creative Table 2. Secondary Focal Species. Commons). Breeding Extirpated Good Moderate Poor Species range colonial hemi-marsh hemi-marsh hemi-marsh peripheral breeder indicator indicator indicator Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) ü ü Yellow-crowned Night-Heron (Nyctanassa violacea) ü ü Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) ü ü Fig. 2. Common Gallinule. Yellow-headed Blackbird Photo: Caleb Putnam. (Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus) ü ü ü Black Tern (Chlidonias niger) ü ü ü American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) ü ü Table 3. Incidental Focal Species. Breeding Good Moderate Poor Wetland Species range hemi-marsh hemi-marsh hemi-marsh generalist peripheral indicator indicator indicator Fig. 3. Least Bittern. American Coot Photo: Caleb Putnam. (Fulica americana) ü ü Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors) ü ü Black-crowned Night-Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) ü Marsh Wren (Cistothorus palustris) ü ü Sora (Porzana carolina) ü ü Virginia Rail ü ü Fig. 4. King Rail. (Rallus limicola) Photo: Andy Jones. 6 | 7 Data Collection therein. Points were distributed at primary focal species was broad- a spacing of one point per 200m cast, with periods of silent listening Following the Standardized North grid cell, at an accessible location before and after the recordings. All American Marsh Bird Monitoring within the marsh. Kayaks were used visual and audio responses were Protocol (Conway 2011), participants to survey seven of the sites, as no recorded on the datasheet. After conducted three regular point land-based access was available to each survey, the observer sketched counts at each assigned point three most of the points. Each point was the boundaries of each territory times each season (first during visited for 14 minutes in sequence on a satellite imagery map based May 1-15, then again May 16-31, and starting 30 minutes prior to sunrise on their interpretation of territory finally June 1-15). The number of and finishing at the latest three locations. Photos of our monitors points varied from two to thirteen hours post-sunrise. At each point, working in the Calumet are shown in depending on the size of the site a pre-recorded playback including Figures 4-6. and the amount of marsh habitat vocalizations of each of the four Fig. 4. A rainy day for training - NIRMI Stewardship liaisons Axel Dutton (center), Libby Keyes, and Linda Magyar (right) at Wolf Lake with Thomas Barnes and Nat Miller of Audubon Great Lakes (left). Photo: Peter Avis (NIRMI). Fig. 5. NIRMI Stewardship Liaison Axel Dutton surveying birds at Kennedy to Fig. 6. NIRMI Stewardship Liaison Libby Keyes conducting a bird survey at Cline West. Photo: Peter Avis (NIRMI). Kennedy to Cline West. Photo: Peter Avis (NIRMI). CALUMET WETLANDS BIRD MONITORING Table 4. Sites included in Calumet wetlands bird surveys from 2015-2016. *Gibson Woods was not surveyed during 2016, due to access problems. # Kayak Surveyed Surveyed Site points survey 2015 2016 Eggers Grove 6 ü ü ü Burnham Prairie 11 û ü ü Hegewisch Marsh 8 û ü ü 126th St. Marsh 3 û ü ü Heron Pond 5 û ü ü Park 564 (Big Marsh) 13 ü ü ü 136th St. marsh 3 û ü ü Powderhorn 7 û ü ü Park 565 (Indian Ridge North) 5 ü ü ü Park 565 (Indian Ridge South) 4 û ü ü Park 562 (Van Vlissengen) 7 û û ü Park 576 (Whitford Pond) 8 û û ü Calumet Conservation Area 2 7 û û ü Lake Calumet Conservation Area 11 ü û ü Hyde Lake 8 û û ü Roxana Marsh 6 ü û ü Strawberry Island 10 ü û ü DuPont 5 û û ü Ivanhoe 11 û û ü Pine Station Nature Preserve 6 û û ü Clark and Pine 11 û û ü Tolleston Ridges & Gibson Woods* 6 û û ü Kennedy To Cline East 6 û û ü Kennedy To Cline West 10 û û ü Wolf Lake Pool 6 7 û û ü Wolf Lake Pool 5 7 û û ü Wolf Lake Management Unit 9 2 û û ü Sand Ridge Nature Center 2 û û ü Conway density estimates future, but do not directly measure trends for each species, and to closely This yields a reliable minimum territory breeding birds, since all detections are measure breeding occupancy, rather count for each site for each year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Information for the Marian's Marsh Wren Biological
    Supplemental Information for the Marian’s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review Report The following pages contain peer reviews received from selected peer reviewers, comments received during the public comment period, and the draft report that was reviewed before the final report was completed March 31, 2011 Table of Contents Peer review #1 from Tylan Dean ................................................................................... 3 Peer review #2 from Paul Sykes.................................................................................... 4 Peer review #3 from Sally Jue ....................................................................................... 5 Peer review #4 from Don Kroodsman ........................................................................... 9 Peer review #5 from Craig Parenteau ........................................................................ 10 Copy of the Marian’s Marsh Wren BSR draft report that was sent out for peer review ........................................................................................................................... 11 Supplemental Information for the Marian’s Marsh Wren 2 Peer review #1 from Tylan Dean From: [email protected] To: Imperiled Cc: Delany, Michael Subject: Re: FW: Marian"s marsh wren BSR report Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:38:25 PM Attachments: 20110126 Dean Peer Review of Draft Worthington"s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review.docx 20110126 Dean Peer Review of Draft Marian"s Marsh Wren Biological Status Review.docx Here are both of my
    [Show full text]
  • B a N I S T E R I A
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1
    Ixobrychus exilis (Gmelin) Leastleast Bitternbittern, Page 1 State Distribution Best Survey Period Copyright The Otter Side Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State threatened state.” Wood (1951) identified the species as a summer resident and common in southern tiers of counties and Global and state rank: G5/S2 Cheboygan County, but rare and local in the Upper Peninsula. Least bittern was later described by Payne Family: Ardeidae – Herons, Egrets, and Bitterns (1983) as an uncommon transient and summer resident, with nesting confirmed in 27 counties. Michigan Total range: Five subspecies of least bittern are found Breeding Bird Atlas (Atlas) surveys conducted in the throughout much of North, Central, and South America 1980s confirmed breeding in 20 survey blocks in 17 (Gibbs et al. 1992). In North America, this species is counties (Adams 1991). All of these observations primarily restricted to the eastern U.S., ranging from occurred in the Lower Peninsula, with the number of the Great Plains states eastward to the Atlantic Coast blocks and counties with confirmed breeding nearly split and north to the Great Lakes region and the New between the northern (9 blocks in 8 counties) and England states (Evers 1994). Western populations are southern (11 blocks in 9 counties) Lower Peninsula concentrated in low-lying areas of the Central Valley (Adams 1991). Researchers confirmed nesting at and Modoc Plateau of California, the Klamath and several sites on Saginaw Bay and observed possible Malheur basins of Oregon, and along the Colorado breeding in Munuscong Bay wetlands (Chippewa River in southwest Arizona and southeast California County) during avian studies conducted in the mid- (Gibbs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Long-Billed Marsh Wren
    Vol. 67 BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE LONG-BILLED MARSH WREN BY JARED VERNER Although much of the life history of the Long-billed Marsh Wren (Telmatodytes pulustris) has been described (see especially Welter, 1935 ; Bent, 1948; and Kale, MS), most aspects have not been quantified adequately to permit analysis of geo- graphical variation between populations, Such variation often leads to insights into the ecology of a species which would otherwise be impossible. This paper presents comparative data on birds from two populations in Washington State, one (T. p. paludicola) at Seattle, the other (T. p. plesius) at Turnbull National Wildlife Refuge, 15 miles south of Spokane and 22.5 miles due east of Seattle (fig. 1). Other aspects of this study are treated elsewhere (Verner, 1964; also MS, 1963). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is a pleasure to acknowledge the numerous helpful suggestions and criticisms of Drs. Frank Richardson and Gordon H. Orians throughout the course of this study. Dr. R. C. Snyder kindly read the manuscript. Many colleagues assisted with field work and were helpful in discussions of the data; in this regard I would especially like to thank T. H. Frazzetta, M. E. Kriebel, K. P. Mauzey, E. R. Pianka, C. C. Smith, L. W. Spring, and M. F. Willson. My wife, Marlene, processed many of the raw field data and was responsible for lettering most of the figures. Working facilities were provided by the Department of Zoology, University of Washington, and financial assistance was provided by National Science Foundation predoctoral fellowships (1960-1963). STUDY AREAS At Seattle, two marshes (Red, 6.3 acres, and Blue, 3.3 acres) in the University of Washington Arboretum were studied in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Avian Ecology
    Compendium of Avian Ecology ZOL 360 Brian M. Napoletano All images taken from the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/infocenter.html Taxonomic information based on the A.O.U. Check List of North American Birds, 7th Edition, 1998. Ecological Information obtained from multiple sources, including The Sibley Guide to Birds, Stokes Field Guide to Birds. Nest and other images scanned from the ZOL 360 Coursepack. Neither the images nor the information herein be copied or reproduced for commercial purposes without the prior consent of the original copyright holders. Full Species Names Common Loon Wood Duck Gaviiformes Anseriformes Gaviidae Anatidae Gavia immer Anatinae Anatini Horned Grebe Aix sponsa Podicipediformes Mallard Podicipedidae Anseriformes Podiceps auritus Anatidae Double-crested Cormorant Anatinae Pelecaniformes Anatini Phalacrocoracidae Anas platyrhynchos Phalacrocorax auritus Blue-Winged Teal Anseriformes Tundra Swan Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Anatini Cygnini Anas discors Cygnus columbianus Canvasback Anseriformes Snow Goose Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Aythyini Anserini Aythya valisineria Chen caerulescens Common Goldeneye Canada Goose Anseriformes Anseriformes Anatidae Anserinae Anatinae Anserini Aythyini Branta canadensis Bucephala clangula Red-Breasted Merganser Caspian Tern Anseriformes Charadriiformes Anatidae Scolopaci Anatinae Laridae Aythyini Sterninae Mergus serrator Sterna caspia Hooded Merganser Anseriformes Black Tern Anatidae Charadriiformes Anatinae
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation of American and Least Bitterns in South Carolina William Post Charleston Museum, 360 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC 29403
    Status and Conservation of American and Least Bitterns in South Carolina William Post Charleston Museum, 360 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC 29403 Introduction Two species of solitary marsh-nesting Ardeidae, the American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) and the Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), nest in North America. Both have been classified in parts of their respective ranges as threatened, endangered, or of special concern. Their population declines are related to destruction of freshwater wetlands. Due to the secretive behavior of these birds and the relatively inaccessible habitats that they occupy, little is known about their biology in southeastern North America. In this paper I review what is known of the two species in South Carolina and adjacent areas. American Bittern Autumn and winter. Unlike other herons occurring in the Southeast, most individuals of this species are solitary and cryptic all year. This behavior makes it difficult to locate more than one or two individuals in a day’s field work. Because the American Bittern occurs in the summer as either a breeder or vagrant, it is difficult to establish the dates of its arrival in the autumn or of its departure in the spring. Single birds reported on the edge of Hell-Hole Swamp, Charleston County, on 11 August 1921 (E. A. Hyer) and at Bear Island, Colleton County, on 10 July 1991 (J. E. Cely) were possibly vagrants (McNair and Post 1993). Tomkins (1958) states that although the American Bittern was “more common than one would suspect” during winter at the Savannah River Wildlife Refuge (Jasper County), E. O. Mellinger, the refuge manager, had no information that the species occurred in summer.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: SECRETIVE MARSHBIRDS of URBAN WETLANDS in the WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA Patrice Nielson
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: SECRETIVE MARSHBIRDS OF URBAN WETLANDS IN THE WASHINGTON, DC METROPOLITAN AREA Patrice Nielson, Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Dissertation directed by: Dr. William Bowerman and Dr. Andrew Baldwin Environmental Science and Technology Secretive marshbirds are in decline across their range and are species of greatest conservation need in state Wildlife Action Plans. However, their secretive nature means there is relatively sparse information available on their ecology. There is demand for this information in the Washington, DC area for updating conservation plans and guiding wetland restoration. Rapid Wetland Assessment Methods are often used to monitor success of restoration but it is unknown how well they indicate marshbird habitat. Using the Standardized North American Marshbird Monitoring Protocol, I surveyed 51 points in 25 marshes in the DC area in 2013 – 2015. I also collected data on marsh area, buffer width, vegetation/water interspersion, vegetation characteristics, flooding, and invertebrates. At each bird survey point I assessed wetland quality using the Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) and California Rapid Wetland Assessment (CRAM) methods. I used Program Presence to model detection and occupancy probabilities of secretive marshbirds as a function of habitat variables. I found king rails (Rallus elegans) at five survey sites and least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis) at thirteen survey sites. Secretive marshbirds were using both restored and natural marshes, marshes with and without invasive plant species, and marshes with a variety of dominant vegetation species. King rail occupancy was positively correlated with plant diversity and invertebrate abundance and weakly negatively correlated with persistent vegetation. Least bittern occupancy was strongly negatively correlated woody vegetation and invertebrate abundance and weakly positively correlated with persistent vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marsh Wren Braddock Bay Bird Observatory
    Fall 2016 www.bbbo.org The Marsh Wren Braddock Bay Bird Observatory A non-profit organization dedicated to ornithological research, education, and conservation. Feather by Feather ave you ever wondered what our banders are molt begins in the nest, and for others it takes place weeks looking at when they peer so intently at a bird’s tail to months after fledging. While the flight feathers of the or wing, smoothing the feathers or fanning them wing and tail are typically not replaced during this molt, Hout for a better view? The simple answer is . molt! the body plumage is replaced with feathers much closer in appearance to adult feathers. All About Molt At the end of the breeding season, adult passerines in North America undergo a complete molt of all body and flight In addition to determining a bird’s appearance, feathers feathers, resulting in a uniform coat of feathers termed the serve many important functions including insulation from “basic plumage”. Some species have an additional molt - the elements and flight control. Feathers wear out over time, typically in the spring - to prepare for the breeding season. and so all birds replace their feathers in predictable patterns This molt, called the “prelternate molt”, is typically not on an annual cycle. The process of feather replacement is complete and may involve only a few feathers on the body called “molt.” and wing. Birds like ducks and geese are covered with fuzzy downy feathers when they hatch, but passerines hatch essentially Juvenal Feathers Tell the Tale featherless. They have, or may acquire, a sparse coat of natal down but these wispy feathers are quickly replaced Juvenal feathers are different than their adult counterparts.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus Platensis Page I of 19
    Comprehensive Report Species - Cistothorus platensis Page I of 19 NatureServe () EXPLORER • '•rr•K•;7",,v2' <-~~~ •••'F"'< •j • ':'•k• N :;}• <"• Seach bot. the Dat -Abou-U Cot Chana eCrite «<Previous I Next»> Cistothorusplatensis - (Latham, 1790) Google, Sedge Wren Search for Images on Google Spanish Common Names: Chivirin Sabanero, Chercan de las Vegas French Common Names: Troglodyte & bec court Other Common Names: Curruira-do-Campo Unique Identifier: ELEMENTGLOBAL.2.105322 Element Code: ABPBG10010 Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Birds - Perching Birds Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Animalia Craniata Aves Passeriformes Troglodytidae Cistothorus Genus Size: B - Very small genus (2-5 species) Check this box to expand all report sections: Concept Reference 0 Concept Reference: American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 829 pp. Concept Reference Code: B98AOU01NAUS Name Used in Concept Reference: Cistothorusplatensis Taxonomic Comments: Formerly known as Short-billed Marsh-Wren. Composed of three groups: STELLARIS (Sedge Wren), PLATENSIS (Western Grass-Wren), and POLYGLOTTUS (Eastern Grass-Wren) (AOU 1998). Constitutes a superspecies with C. MERIDAE and C. APOLINARI (AOU 1998). Conservation Status 0 NatureServe Status Global Status: G5 Global Status Last Reviewed: 03Dec1996 Global Status Last Changed: 03Dec1996 Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure Nation: United States National Status: N4B,N5N Nation: Canada National Status:N5B
    [Show full text]
  • List of Birds in Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica
    http://www.nicoyapeninsula.com/paloverde/paloverdebirdlist.html Page 1 of 8 List of Birds in Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica SPECIES English Spanish TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Crypturellus cinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou Tinamú Canelo PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptus dominicus Least Grebe Zambullidor Enano Podilymbus podiceps Pied-billed Grebe Zambullidor Piquipinto PELECANIFORMES PHALACROCORACIDAE Phalacrocorax brasilianus Neotropic Cormorant Cormorán Neotropical ANHINGIDAE Anhinga anhinga Anhinga Pato Aguja FREGATIDAE Fregata magnificens Magnificent Frigatebird Rabihorcado Magno CICONIIFORMES ARDEIDAE Botaurus pinnatus Pinnated Bittern Avetoro Neotropical Ixobrychus exilis Least Bittern Avetorillo Pantanero Tigrisoma mexicanum Bare-throated Tiger-Heron Garza-Tigre Cuellinuda Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Garzón Azulado Ardea alba Great Egret Garceta Grande Egretta thula Snowy Egret Garceta Nivosa Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron Garceta Azul Egretta tricolor Tricolored Heron Garceta Tricolor Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Garcilla Bueyera Butorides virescens Green Heron Garcilla Verde Nycticorax nycticorax Black-crowned Night-Heron Martinete Coroninegro Nyctanassa violacea Yellow-crowned Night-Heron Martinete Cabecipinto Cochlearius cochlearius Boat-billed Heron Pico-Cuchara THRESKIORNITHIDAE Threskiornithinae Eudocimus albus White Ibis Ibis Blanco Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Ibis Morito Plataleinae Platalea ajaja Roseate Spoonbill Espátula Rosada CICONIIDAE Jabiru mycteria Jabiru Jabirú Mycteria americana Wood Stork Cigueñon
    [Show full text]
  • Marsh Wren Cistothorus Palustris
    Appendix A: Birds Marsh Wren Cistothorus palustris Federal Listing N/A State Listing N/A Global Rank G5 State Rank S3 Regional Status High Photo by Pamela Hunt Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Secretive marsh birds like the Marsh Wren have generally been considered conservation priorities because of known losses of wetland habitats, combined with often poor data on species’ distribution, abundance, and trend. In the case of the Marsh Wren, repeated Breeding Bird Atlases in the Northeast have consistently documented stable or increasing range occupancy (Cadman et al. 2007, McGowan and Corwin 2008, Renfrew 2013, MassAudubon 2014). The Breeding Bird Survey does a better job of estimating trends for Marsh Wren than other wetland birds, and based on BBS data populations are generally increasing or stable, although most data are from the West and Midwest (Sauer et al. 2014). Data for the Northeast are more equivocal, with declines in some areas, increases in others, and few significant trends. There are no data on trends in New Hampshire, although there is some evidence for local extirpations related to changes in habitat. Distribution Breeds across southern Canada and the northern and western United States, and along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. There is also an isolated population in central Mexico (Kroodsma and Verner 2014). Winters in the western and coastal portions of the breeding range, and also in much of Mexico and the southwestern U.S. In New Hampshire, most breeding season records are from two general areas: the Connecticut River valley and Great Bay/Seacoast, with scattered records elsewhere inland where suitable habitat is present.
    [Show full text]
  • Least Bittern Ixobrychus Exilis
    Appendix A: Birds Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis Federal Listing N/A State Listing SC Global Rank G5 State Rank S1 Regional Status Very High Photo by Pamela Hunt Justification (Reason for Concern in NH) Secretive marsh birds like the Least Bittern have generally been considered conservation priorities because of known losses of wetland habitats, combined with often poor data on species’ distribution, abundance, and trend. In the case of the Least Bittern, there are only a handful of potential breeding sites in New Hampshire, and some of these (plus a couple of historic sites) are in the more developed southeastern part of the state. Range‐wide, Least Bittern populations appear stable (Sauer et al. 2014), although data are limited, and Breeding Bird Atlases in the Northeast did not document significant range retractions in most areas. Distribution Breeds locally across the eastern United States, primarily in the Mississippi Valley and along the Atlantic and Gulf coastal plains. The species is highly dispersed and local in the West, and patchily distributed in Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean, and extends well south into South America (Poole et al. 2009). Northern populations withdraw to the southern U.S., Caribbean, and Central America in winter. Least Bitterns have been recorded during the breeding season (conservatively June‐July) at eight New Hampshire locations since 1990, as follows: •Tuttle Swamp, Newmarket (1999) •Stubb’s Pond, Newington (1999‐2001) •Jewell Brook wetlands, Stratham (2006) •Surrey Lane marsh, Durham (2006‐2014) •Lake Wantastiquet marshes, Hinsdale (2007‐2013) •North River Road, Epping (2009) •Thompson Wildlife Sanctuary, Sandwich (2009) •World End Pond, Salem (2014) Of these, three are considered sites where the species is considered a probable or confirmed breeder.
    [Show full text]