DOCSLIB.ORG

The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme 5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 (CORAM: KATUREEBE, C.J, TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE, 10 ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA, OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ. SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 15 YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI ……………. 1st RESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………… 2nd RESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………… 3rd RESPONDENT PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI 20 CURIAE DETAILED REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the presidential 25 election that was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the 1 5 Supreme Court under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 and the Electoral Commission Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the PEA and the ECA, respectively). He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the 1st Respondent, was not 10 validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. On the 31st March 2016, we delivered our decision in line with the Constitutional timeline imposed on the Court to render its judgment within 30 days from the date of filing the petition. We were not, however, in a position to give detailed reasons for our 15 findings and conclusion. We found that the 1st Respondent was validly elected as President in accordance with Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 of the PEA. Accordingly, we unanimously dismissed the petition. We made no order as to costs. 20 We promised to give the detailed reasons at a later date, which we now give in this judgment. Background The 18th February 2016 General Elections were the 3rd since the re-introduction of multiparty politics in Uganda as the country 25 shifted from the movement system. The presidential race attracted a total of eight candidates, four of whom were party sponsored while four vied as independent candidates. The Petitioner stood as an independent candidate while the 1st 2 5 Respondent stood on the NRM party ticket. The others were: Dr. Kizza Besigye Kifefe (Forum For Democratic Change); Abed Bwanika (The Peoples Development Party); Baryamureeba Venansius (Independent); Benon Buta Biraaro (The Farmers Development Party); Mabiriizi Elton Joseph (Independent) and 10 Maureen Faith Kyalya Waluube (Independent). On the 20th February 2016, the Electoral Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “Commission”), declared the presidential election results as follows: - Abed Bwanika 86,075 (0.93%) 15 - Amama Mbabazi 132,574 (1.43%) - Baryamureeba Venansius 51,086 (0.55%) - Benon Buta Biraaro 24,675. (0.27%) - Kiiza Besigye Kifefe 3, 270,290 (35.37%) - Mabiriizi Joseph 23,762 (0.26%) 20 - Maureen Faith Kyalya Waluube 40,598 (0.44%) - Yoweri Kaguta Museveni 5,617,503 (60.75%) The Petitioner was aggrieved by the above declared results. He filed this petition before this Court under Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 (1) of the PEA, based on various 25 grounds and complaints. In the petition, the Petitioner contended that the election was conducted without compliance with the provisions and the principles of the PEA, the ECA and the 1995 Constitution and 3 5 that this affected the result of the election in a substantial manner. For this, he faults the Commission. The specific complaints against the Commission included: illegal nomination of the 1st Respondent, illegal extension of nomination deadline, failure to compile a National Voters 10 Register, failure to issue voters cards resulting in disenfranchisement of voters, use of unreliable Biometric Voter Verification Machine (BVVK), failure to identify voters, late delivery of polling materials, failure to control polling materials, starting voting without first opening the ballot boxes, allowing 15 voting without secret ballot, pre-ticking and stuffing of ballot papers, voting before and after polling time, multiple voting, allowing unauthorized persons to vote in the presidential elections, prevention of the Petitioner’s agents from voting, chasing away the Petitioner’s agents from polling stations and 20 denying the Petitioner’s agents information. Another set of allegations consisted of noncompliance with electoral laws by the Commission during the process of counting, tallying, transmission and declaration of results namely: counting and tallying of election results in the absence 25 of the Petitioner’s agents; declaration of results without Declaration of Results Forms; unlawful electronic transmission of results from districts to the National Tally Centre using the Electronic Results Transmission and Dissemination System( ERTDS); illegal and unlawful declaration of the 1st Respondent 4 5 as the winner of the presidential election without District Returns and District Tally Sheets and lack of transparency in the declaration of results. Among the specific complaints against the 1st Respondent were that several illegal practices and electoral offences were allegedly 10 committed by him either personally, or with his knowledge and consent or approval. They included voter bribery, violence and intimidation, making derogatory statements, war mongering and misuse of Government resources. The Petitioner made no specific complaint against the Attorney 15 General but several allegations were made against public officers and security personnel. The Petitioner’s prayers to the Court included: an order for vote recount in 45 districts named in the petition; a declaration that the 1st Respondent was not validly elected as president; an 20 order annulling the election of the 1st Respondent and an award of the costs of the petition to him. The 1st Respondent denied the Petitioner’s allegations of breaches of the law. The Commission also opposed the petition and contended that the election was held in compliance with the 25 provisions of the electoral laws and asserted that, if there was any noncompliance, which was denied, it did not affect the result of the election in a substantial manner. 5 5 The Attorney General (hereinafter referred to as the “AG”) opposed the petition as well and further contended that it was, in any case, improperly joined as a party to the petition. All the Respondents sought the dismissal of the petition with costs. 10 At the commencement of the hearing, counsel for the Petitioner applied under Article 126 of the Constitution, Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act and Rule 15 of the Presidential elections (Election Petitions) Rules, 2001 vide Miscellaneous Application No. 1 of 2016 to amend the petition. The application was 15 allowed and the Amended Petition was filed on the 7th March 2016. The Respondents filed their answers to the Amended Petition on the 9th March 2016. Two applications were also brought before Court prior to the hearing of the petition for leave to intervene as amicus curiae in 20 the petition. The first one, Professor Oloka Onyango & Ors (MA No. 2 2016), was brought by lecturers from Makerere University Law School jointly. The second application, Foundation for Human Rights Initiative & Ors, (MA No. 3 of 2016), was brought by Civil Society organizations. Court allowed 25 Miscellaneous Application No. 02 of 2016 and dismissed Miscellaneous Application No. 3 of 2016. The Makerere University lecturers filed their amicus brief on the 17th of March 2016 which was copied to the parties. 6 5 The hearing of the petition commenced on 14th March, 2016 and ended on 19th March, 2016. Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 58 of the PEA require that the petition must be inquired into and determined expeditiously and the Court must declare its findings not later than thirty days from the date of filing the 10 petition. The Judgment was thus set to be delivered on 31st March 2016. In accordance with the Presidential elections (Election Petitions) Rules 1996, the parties filed affidavit evidence in support of each party’s case. Furthermore, the chairman of the Commission, 15 Engineer Dr. Badru Kiggundu was cross-examined by the Petitioner’s counsel. Although the Petitioner stated in his affidavit that he had annexed documents set out in a list mentioned as Annexure ‘A’ as well as copies of Election Observers Reports, that was not the case. These affidavits were 20 in fact never filed in Court, nor were the Election Observer Reports. The Petitioner however, filed other affidavits on or about the 10th of March 2016. At the pre-hearing conference, the parties agreed on the following facts: 25 1. That there was a Presidential election conducted by the Commission on the 18th February, 2016. 7 5 2. That on 20th February 2016, the 1st Respondent was declared as validly elected president with 5,617,503 votes representing 60.75%of the valid votes cast. 3. That on the 20th February 2016, the Petitioner was declared to have polled 132,574 votes representing 1.43% oF the valid 10 votes cast. The agreed issues were: 1. Whether there was noncompliance with the provisions of the PEA and Electoral Commission Act, in the conduct oF the 2016 Presidential election. 15 2. Whether the said election was not conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the PEA, and the Electoral Commission Act. 20 3. Whether iF either issue 1 and 2 or both are answered in the aFFirmative, such noncompliance with the said laws and the principles aFFected the results oF the elections in a substantial manner. 25 4. Whether the alleged illegal practices or any electoral oFFences in the petition under the Presidential election Act, were committed by the 1st Respondent personally, or by his agents with his knowledge and consent or approval. 8 5 5. Whether the Attorney General (AG) was correctly added as a respondent in this election petition. 6. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to any of the reliefs sought. Representation At the hearing, the Petitioner was represented by learned 10 Counsel Mohamed Mbabazi, Michael Akampurira, Asuman Basalirwa, Severino Twinobusingye and Jude Byamukama.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Twitter Activity on Election Eve and Election Day in Uganda
    #UgandaDecides Analysis of Twitter Activity on Election Eve and Election Day in Uganda Monitoring Uganda Elections Series 02 #UgandaDecides April 2016 Uganda held presidential and parliamentary elections on February 18, 2016. In the lead-up to the elections, Uganda held the first presidential debates. See an analysis of Twitter Activity around the debates. Excitement about the election was palpable in online commentary on the eve of the elections. However, on the morning of the Election Day, many were unable to access social media sites including Facebook and Twitter, the popular money transfer service Mobile Money, and the mobile-based texting platform Whatsapp. The national communications regulator, Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), had instructed service providers to block access to these platforms in a bid to “protect public order and safety”. This action instead resulted in users turning to Introduction Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) in order to circumvent the blockage and exercise their right to freedom of expression, access and share information on the voting and vote tallying processes. Figure 1: A tweep points out the violation of Freedom of Expression following the shutdown of social media platforms President Yoweri Museveni defended the shutdown in a press conference saying, “There must be steps taken for security to stop so many creating trouble… it’s temporary. It will go away. Because some people misuse those pathways. You know how they misuse them, telling lies. If you want a right, then use it properly.” Further, the UCC claimed that the instruction to shut down social media was made by the Inspector General of Police Kale Kayihura.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouganda : Un Pays En Mutation Au Cœur D’Une Zone De Fractures
    Les Études du CERI N 4 - septembre 1995 Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Centre d’études et de recherches internationales Fondation nationale des sciences politiques Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Entre les images de mort des années Amin et Obote, de la guerre civile et du sida et le souvenir nostalgique de la “ perle de l’Afrique ” (Churchill), l’Ouganda reste prisonnier de clichés hérités d’un passé chaotique qui ne reflètent pourtant plus guère la réalité. L’Ou- ganda actuel est en effet un pays en complète mutation, en pleine reconstruction économique et politique, qui devient un pôle essentiel de stabilité régionale au coeur d’une zone de fractures minée par la violence, marquée par des conflits “ tectoniques ” et la déliquescence des structures économiques ou étatiques. Après des années de guerre civile, au gré d’un processus de pacification et de démocratisation assez lent, un nouvel ordre politique est en train d’émerger. Au plan économique, en contraste avec ses voisins immédiats, l’Ou- ganda offre l’image d’un pays en croissance qui offre aux investisseurs des opportunités d’autant plus intéressantes que se réactive un processus d’intégration régionale (au sein de la Communauté est-africaine) qui, à l’horizon 2000, devrait constituer un des plus vastes marchés d’Afrique avec près de 100 millions d’habitants. A travers cette étude, nous voudrions d’abord évaluer l’ampleur de ces mutations opé- rées par l’Ouganda depuis quelques années et les enjeux économiques, politiques et di- plomatiques qu’elles comportent pour l’ensemble de la zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending CHILD MARRIAGE and TEENAGE PREGNANCY in Uganda
    ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA 1 A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA Final Report - December 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Children Fund (UNICEF) gratefully acknowledges the valuable contribution of many individuals whose time, expertise and ideas made this research a success. Gratitude is extended to the Research Team Lead by Dr. Florence Kyoheirwe Muhanguzi with support from Prof. Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo and all the Research Assistants for the 10 districts for their valuable support to the research process. Lastly, UNICEF would like to acknowledge the invaluable input of all the study respondents; women, men, girls and boys and the Key Informants at national and sub national level who provided insightful information without whom the study would not have been accomplished. I ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA A FORMATIVE RESEARCH TO GUIDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATIONAL STRATEGY ON ENDING CHILD MARRIAGE AND TEENAGE PREGNANCY IN UGANDA CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................I
    [Show full text]
  • The Inspector General of Government and the Question of Political Corruption in Uganda
    Frustrated Or Frustrating S AND P T EA H C IG E R C E N N A T M E U R H H URIPEC FRUSTRATED OR FRUSTRATING? THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF GOVERNMENT AND THE QUESTION OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UGANDA Daniel Ronald Ruhweza HURIPEC WORKING PAPER NO. 20 November, 2008 Frustrated Or Frustrating FRUSTRATED OR FRUSTRATING? THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF GOVERNMENT AND THE QUESTION OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UGANDA Daniel R. Ruhweza HURIPEC WORKING PAPER No. 20 NOVEMBER, 2008 Frustrated Or Frustrating FRUSTRATED OR FRUSTRATING? THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF GOVERNMENT AND THE QUESTION OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UGANDA ­­aniel R. Ruhweza Copyright© Human Rights & Peace Centre, 2008 ISBN 9970-511-24-8 HURIPEC Working Paper No. 20 NOVEMBER 2008 Frustrated Or Frustrating TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................... i LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS......................………..………............ ii LIST OF LEGISLATION & INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS….......… iii LIST OF CASES …………………………………………………….. .......… iv SUMMARY OF THE REPORT AND MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS……...... v I: INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………........ 1 1.1 Working Definitions….………………............................................................... 5 1.1.1 The Phenomenon of Corruption ……………………………………....... 5 1.1.2 Corruption in Uganda……………………………………………….... 6 II: RATIONALE FOR THE CREATION OF THE INSPECTORATE … .... 9 2.1 Historical Context …………………………………………………............ 9 2.2 Original Mandate of the Inspectorate.………………………….…….......... 9 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Date: 30 October 2008
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2017/18 ANNUAL REPORT RESILIENCE AND RECOVERY ABOUT US New Vision Printing & Publishing Company Limited started business in March 1986. It is a multimedia business housing newspapers, magazines, internet publishing, televisions, radios, commercial printing, advertising and distribution services. The Company is listed on the Uganda Securities Exchange. Our Vision A globally respected African media powerhouse that advances society Mission To be a market-focused, performance-driven organisation, managed on global standards of operational and financial efficiency Values • Honesty • Innovation • Fairness • Courage • Excellence • Zero tolerance to corruption • Social responsibility 2 VISION GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2017/18 INTRODUCTION This is the Annual Report of New Vision Printing & Publishing Company Limited trading as Vision Group for the year ended June 30, 2018. This Annual Report includes financial and non-financial information. It sets out the Company’s strategy, financial, operational, governance, social and environmental performance. The Annual Report also contains the risks and opportunities affecting the Company. The purpose of producing an Annual Report is to give the shareholders an annual view of how the Company has performed and what the Board is striving to do on behalf of the shareholders. 1 TABLE OF contENT Notice of Annual General Meeting 4 Company Profile 5 Business Review 15 Board of Directors 19 Chairperson’s Statement 21 Executive Committee 26 CEO’s Statement 27 Corporate Governance Statement 31 Shareholder Information 42 Proxy Card 47 Sustainability Report 50 Accolades 80 Financial Statements 82 2 VISION GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2017/18 LIST OF AcronYMS AGM - Annual General Meeting Annual Report - An annual report is a comprehensive report on a company’s activities including the financial performance throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda
    RULE BY LAW DIscRImInAtORy legIslAtIOn AnD legItImIzeD Abuses In ugAnDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: AFR 59/06/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Ugandan activists demonstrate in Kampala on 26 February 2014 against the Anti-Pornography Act. © Isaac Kasamani amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Ownership and Its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda
    African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED MUST REPRESENT THOSE OF MANAGEMENT Radio Ownership and its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda 1 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Published by: (C) African Centre for Media Excellence For more information contact: African Centre for Media Excellence (ACME) Plot 124 Nanjala Road, Soya-Bunga P. O. Box 11283 Kampala Tel: +256 392 731 067 Fax: +256 392 254 167 Email: [email protected] Website: www.acme-ug.org Layout and Printing Graphic Mutations Ltd., Kampala (U) Tel: +256 414 691 238 / 752 436 317 Email: [email protected] 2 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Acknowledgement This study was conducted and authored by George W. Lugalambi (Ph.D), Bernard Tabaire, and Peter Nyanzi. The project was supervised by Peter G. Mwesige (Ph.D). We would like to thank Freedom House for supporting the study and the printing of this report. We would also like to thank the Uganda Communications Commission and FM radio station owners who agreed to be interviewed for their co-operation and support. 3 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Contents Introduction Objectives of the study The approach Access to radio during political campaigns The space for critical political discourse The role of regulation Conclusion: Implications for media freedom and political speech References About ACME 4 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Introduction The question of who owns the media has in recent years become a growing subject of debate and contention in Uganda. The need to address this question gained greater urgency during the 2011 elections as it emerged that access to radio, in particular, appeared to be influenced by political considerations rather more explicitly than at other times and in previous elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Corruption in Africa – a Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation
    Fighting Corruption in Africa – A Comparative Study of Uganda and Botswana Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Verwaltungswissenschaften (Dr. rer. publ.) der Deutschen Hochschule für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer vorgelegt von: Stefan Ittner Speyer, 2009 Erstgutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. iur. Hans Herbert von Arnim, Dipl.-Volkswirt Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Sefik Alp Bahadir Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 18. März 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ___________________________________________ 4 I. INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________ 5 1. Object and Scope of Study ______________________________________________ 5 2. Structure of the Study_________________________________________________ 15 II. DEFINING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 17 III. FIGHTING CORRUPTION ______________________________________ 26 1. Common Strategies Against Corruption__________________________________ 26 2. Criteria For Judging the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Measures __________ 30 3. Difficulties in Fighting Corruption ______________________________________ 34 3.1 General Problems _________________________________________________________34 3.2 Specific Problems of Fighting Corruption in African Countries ______________________43 IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGIES IN UGANDA AND BOTSWANA_____________________________________ 50 1. Historical Background and Determining Factors of Corruption ______________ 50 1.1 Country Profiles___________________________________________________________50
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Road Fund Annual Report FY 2011-12
    ANNUAL REPORT 2011-12 Telephone : 256 41 4707 000 Ministry of Finance, Planning : 256 41 4232 095 & Economic Development Fax : 256 41 4230 163 Plot 2-12, Apollo Kaggwa Road : 256 41 4343 023 P.O. Box 8147 : 256 41 4341 286 Kampala Email : [email protected] Uganda. Website : www.finance.go.ug THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA In any correspondence on this subject please quote No. ISS 140/255/01 16 Dec 2013 The Clerk to Parliament The Parliament of the Republic of Uganda KAMPALA. SUBMISSION OF UGANDA ROAD FUND ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2010/11 In accordance with Section 39 of the Uganda Road Act 2008, this is to submit the Uganda Road Fund Annual performance report for FY 2011/12. The report contains: a) The Audited accounts of the Fund and Auditor General’s report on the accounts of the Fund for FY 2011/12; b) The report on operations of the Fund including achievements and challenges met during the period of reporting. It’s my sincere hope that future reports shall be submitted in time as the organization is now up and running. Maria Kiwanuka MINISTER OF FINANCE, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT cc: The Honourable Minister of Works and Transport cc: The Honourable Minister of Local Government cc: Permanent Secretary/ Secretary to the Treasury cc: Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Works and Transport cc: Permanent Secretary Ministry of Local Government cc: Permanent Secretary Office of the Prime Minister cc: Permanent Secretary Office of the President cc: Chairman Uganda Road Fund Board TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms iii our vision iv
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme Court of Uganda at Kampala
    f' THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA [CORAM:KATUREEBE,C.J; TUMWESIGYE; KISAAKYE; ARACH-AMOKO, 5 NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA, OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TmATEMWA- EK1RIKUBINZA, J JSC} CIVIL APPLICATION NO 03 OF 2016 [Arising from Election Petition No. 01 of2016] 10 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AS AMICUS CURIAE BY THE APPLICANTS HEREIN ARISING FROM ELECTION PETITION NO. 01 OF 2016. 15 BE1WEEN 1. FOUNDATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATNE. 20 2. UGANDA ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN LAWYERS (FIDA UGANDA) 3. CHAPrER FOUR UGANDA 4. HUMAN RIGHTS NETWORK UGANDA 5. CENTRE FOR CONSTITIITIONAL GOVERNANCE 25 6. KITUO CHA KATIBA, EASTERN AFRICAN CENTRE FOR CONSTITIITIONAL DEVELOPMENT 7. LEGAL AID SERVICE PROVIDERS NE1WORK UGANDA 8. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANTS 30 AND AMAMA· MBABAZI··············································.............•.........•....••.•.......•...••.....•.... -] PE'I'll'IONER 1 ; ,,'" ". } 1. YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI 2. ELECTORAL COMMISSION 3 .~A 'TIORNEY GENERAL ........................•.........•...............................•.....•....... ] RESPONDENTS 5 RULING OF THE COURT This application was brought by 8 applicants which are Civil Society Organizations. The applicants are non-governmental organizations and Civil Society Organizations. They were 10 accredited by the Electoral Commission as Election Observers. Some of the applicants are members of the Citizen Coalition for Electoral Democracy (CCEDU) and others are members of Citizens Coalition for Election Observers Network (CEON). The applicants are seeking leave of this Court to be admitted as V 15 Amici Curiae in Presidential Election Petition No. 01 of 2016, permission to file amicus curiae brief in the form of written submissions and filing any further materials that the Court may deem fit. The applicants are also seeking such further orders that this Court may deem appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend " Wanseko " 159 !
    CONSTITUENT MAP FOR UGANDA_ELECTORAL AREAS 2016 CONSTITUENT MAP FOR UGANDA GAZETTED ELECTORAL AREAS FOR 2016 GENERAL ELECTIONS CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY 266 LAMWO CTY 51 TOROMA CTY 101 BULAMOGI CTY 154 ERUTR CTY NORTH 165 KOBOKO MC 52 KABERAMAIDO CTY 102 KIGULU CTY SOUTH 155 DOKOLO SOUTH CTY Pirre 1 BUSIRO CTY EST 53 SERERE CTY 103 KIGULU CTY NORTH 156 DOKOLO NORTH CTY !. Agoro 2 BUSIRO CTY NORTH 54 KASILO CTY 104 IGANGA MC 157 MOROTO CTY !. 58 3 BUSIRO CTY SOUTH 55 KACHUMBALU CTY 105 BUGWERI CTY 158 AJURI CTY SOUTH SUDAN Morungole 4 KYADDONDO CTY EST 56 BUKEDEA CTY 106 BUNYA CTY EST 159 KOLE SOUTH CTY Metuli Lotuturu !. !. Kimion 5 KYADDONDO CTY NORTH 57 DODOTH WEST CTY 107 BUNYA CTY SOUTH 160 KOLE NORTH CTY !. "57 !. 6 KIIRA MC 58 DODOTH EST CTY 108 BUNYA CTY WEST 161 OYAM CTY SOUTH Apok !. 7 EBB MC 59 TEPETH CTY 109 BUNGOKHO CTY SOUTH 162 OYAM CTY NORTH 8 MUKONO CTY SOUTH 60 MOROTO MC 110 BUNGOKHO CTY NORTH 163 KOBOKO MC 173 " 9 MUKONO CTY NORTH 61 MATHENUKO CTY 111 MBALE MC 164 VURA CTY 180 Madi Opei Loitanit Midigo Kaabong 10 NAKIFUMA CTY 62 PIAN CTY 112 KABALE MC 165 UPPER MADI CTY NIMULE Lokung Paloga !. !. µ !. "!. 11 BUIKWE CTY WEST 63 CHEKWIL CTY 113 MITYANA CTY SOUTH 166 TEREGO EST CTY Dufile "!. !. LAMWO !. KAABONG 177 YUMBE Nimule " Akilok 12 BUIKWE CTY SOUTH 64 BAMBA CTY 114 MITYANA CTY NORTH 168 ARUA MC Rumogi MOYO !. !. Oraba Ludara !. " Karenga 13 BUIKWE CTY NORTH 65 BUGHENDERA CTY 115 BUSUJJU 169 LOWER MADI CTY !.
    [Show full text]