DOCSLIB.ORG

Amama Mbabazi Expresses Reservations on the Ruling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6 NEW VISION, Friday, April 1, 2016 NATIONAL NEWS Amama Mbabazi expresses NRM invites Besigye, Mbabazi for talks By David Lumu working with Mbabazi and reservations on the ruling Besigye. They were leaders in With the Supreme Court NRM. Mbabazi has not even By Moses Mulondo petition done and dusted, what returned the NRM party card, next for former prime minister which means he can still work Former independent Amama Mbabazi, is the major with us. Dr. Besigye should presidential candidate Amama political question taking centre also come. NRM invites these Mbabazi has expressed stage. leaders for talks, so that we can reservations about the verdict Speaking to journalists discuss all their issues,” she the judges of the Supreme yesterday, Mbabazi said he said, shortly after the Supreme Court gave yesterday on needs time to exhaustively Court ruling. his petition challenging the answer the question of what “If President Museveni has declaration of President Yoweri next, citing the necessity to been sending teams, some Museveni as the winner of the meet his lawyers and members headed by Dr. Ruhakana presidential election that was of his camp to determine the Rugunda (Prime Minister), to conducted on February 18, way forward. talk to rebels like the leader 2016. However, according to of the Lord’s Resistance Army Flanked by DP president officials from the National Joseph Kony, he could as well Norbert Mao and Justice Forum Resistance Movement (NRM), accommodate Mbabazi and boss Asuman Basalirwa, among the what next package for Besigye, if they return home. others, at the Go Forward Mbabazi is a political sandwich We welcome them to the office in Nakasero, Kampala, of embracing direct talks with roundtable, so that we can Mbabazi said the judgment fell President Yoweri Museveni and debate the issues that forced short of his expectations. seeking political counseling them to leave NRM,” she said. He expressed disappointment from highly experienced Besigye, who broke ranks that the judges never political elders, so that they can with Museveni in 1999, was the considered the raids on the massage his nasty Supreme National Political Commissar chambers of his lawyers and Court loss constructively. and internal affairs state other forms of tampering with Yesterday, all the nine minister, while Mbabazi served evidence like intimidating and justices of the Supreme Court in the NRM government in arresting his witnesses in their Mbabazi addressing the media at the Go Forword offices in Nakasero, Kampala dismissed with no costs various capacities such as judgment. yesterday. Looking on is Asuman Basalirwa, the JEEMA party president Mbabazi’s petition challenging defence minister, Attorney “My summary of the judgment the election of Museveni in the General, secretary general of is that the judges said we have the petitioner had presented. February 18 general elections. the NRM and prime minister. listened to the petitioner, but Mbabazi said the judges did not “Unfortunately, that was not Lumumba added that the he did not produce sufficient done. Actors like Gen. Kale other alternative Mbabazi can evidence. My answer is yes Kayihura should have been take is to seek counsel from I did not present sufficient consider the raids on the chambers summoned to explain why they BETWEEN THE LINES: a team of political advisors, evidence because our evidence behaved in a partisan manner. n Without clearly stating so that he can manage the gathering was tampered with,” of his lawyers and other forms of The judges said the allegations whether he welcomes the double loss, underscoring that he explained. were not proved by evidence NRM’s invitation for talks the silver lining in Mbabazi’s Citing various incidents of tampering with evidence before court, but there is or not, Mbabazi told the court defeat is the fact that the how state agencies reportedly evidence outside court and we press in Kampala that Supreme Court has exonerated tampered with evidence shall present it to the public,” he hates the politics of NRM and its flag-bearer, gathering, including arrests Rakai, who he said had been a decision on the basis of lack he stated. enmity, which he said Museveni. and intimidation of his arrested several times, remains evidence, I accept it. Yes, the Pointing out areas of reforms, has soiled the political “He (Mbabazi) lost the witnesses and the raiding of in detention at Kireka. ruling has come. We go by it.” Mbabazi also observed that landscape in the country. presidential elections and the chambers of his lawyers The other incident he said, Pressed further on whether the 10 days within which a now he has lost the petition. and how the court rejected his was of his co-ordinator for he would regard President presidential petition has to be Yet, in what could be the To manage this double loss, rejoinders, Mbabazi said there Buyende, Mosy Kinga, who Museveni as the legitimate filed and the time given to the pivotal moment of the post- Mbabazi needs political was no opportunity to present he said was arrested by state leader of Uganda for the next court (30 days) to conclude the February general elections, counselling from senior the evidence he had. security agencies and was later five years, Mbabazi said: “As I case is not sufficient. Justine Kasule Lumumba, political elders. Mbabazi has “For instance, the chambers found dead. He said his body said sometime back, the results On what next after the ruling, the NRM secretary general, helped to exonerate us from the of Muwema and Company was found dumped near his Dr. Badru Kiggundu declared Mbabazi said: “We will inform yesterday announced that the 20 allegations. So, everything Advocates had about 300 (Kinga’s) house. By press time, were not a reflection of the will Ugandans on our next course of party had invited Mbabazi and that they were alleging against affidavits which were stolen. New Vision had not verified of the people.” action. We are already carrying Dr. Col. Kizza Besigye of the our candidate and NRM Eyewitnesses confirmed to these claims. On whether he still has out consultations with various Forum for Democratic Change has been found false by the us that those who stole the In light of the various confidence in the judges as he stakeholders. We shall consider (FDC) for direct political talks. court,” she said, congratulating documents were wearing Police incidents of interference with had said at the beginning of the various options available Calling on Mbabazi and Museveni, NRM supporters uniforms. There was no time for the case by state agencies, his petition, Mbabazi said: “I to us. Whatever action we will Besigye to respect the decision and Ugandans for winning us to gather the witnesses from Mbabazi said at some point, have not lost confidence in the take, we will be exercising our of the Supreme Court, the case. On the other hand, various parts of the country to his lawyers advised him to judges. I still have confidence constitutional rights.” Lumumba told journalists the FDC camp and Besigye swear the affidavits again,” he withdraw the petition, but he in them.” Reiterating his position yesterday at the NRM recently came out to say they said. He also said some of his encouraged them to pursue that he parted ways with the headquarters in Kampala, if have no problem with opening supporters have been killed the case to the end amid all the Other concerns leadership of NRM over veering Mbabazi and Besigye agree dialogue links with Museveni and others remain in Police challenges. Mbabazi, who is also a former from democratic principles to open talks with NRM and and NRM as long as such custody. Asked whether he had Attorney General, argued that and values, Mbabazi vowed Museveni, the possibility of talks are structured with an Mbabazi also reported accepted the verdict of the in the course of handling the he would continue working working with them in the agreeable agenda, convened by that one Amos Kaheru, a Go Supreme Court and its case, the Supreme Court ought with democracy-seeking forces Government for the good of the a neutral arbitrator and thick Forward co-ordinator and consequences, Mbabazi said: to have carried out an inquiry so as to promote democracy country could come to a reality. on the national consensus parliamentary candidate from “To the extent that court took to get information beyond what in the country. “There is no problem with framework. Tomorrow in your Saturday SEVEN DAYS, ONE PAPER VisionVision INTIMATE: The day Museveni was arrested at a shop in Mbale Uganda’s SPECIAL REPORT: What happened to the municipalities’ ‘ugliest man’ infrastructure projects? makes 13 years Minister Jim Muhwezi speak out on why he lost elections in marriage Plus: SWAGG, INTIMATE, CRAZY, GOAL!.
Recommended publications
  • Ouganda : Un Pays En Mutation Au Cœur D’Une Zone De Fractures

    Ouganda : Un Pays En Mutation Au Cœur D’Une Zone De Fractures

    Les Études du CERI N 4 - septembre 1995 Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Centre d’études et de recherches internationales Fondation nationale des sciences politiques Ouganda : un pays en mutation au cœur d’une zone de fractures Richard Banégas Entre les images de mort des années Amin et Obote, de la guerre civile et du sida et le souvenir nostalgique de la “ perle de l’Afrique ” (Churchill), l’Ouganda reste prisonnier de clichés hérités d’un passé chaotique qui ne reflètent pourtant plus guère la réalité. L’Ou- ganda actuel est en effet un pays en complète mutation, en pleine reconstruction économique et politique, qui devient un pôle essentiel de stabilité régionale au coeur d’une zone de fractures minée par la violence, marquée par des conflits “ tectoniques ” et la déliquescence des structures économiques ou étatiques. Après des années de guerre civile, au gré d’un processus de pacification et de démocratisation assez lent, un nouvel ordre politique est en train d’émerger. Au plan économique, en contraste avec ses voisins immédiats, l’Ou- ganda offre l’image d’un pays en croissance qui offre aux investisseurs des opportunités d’autant plus intéressantes que se réactive un processus d’intégration régionale (au sein de la Communauté est-africaine) qui, à l’horizon 2000, devrait constituer un des plus vastes marchés d’Afrique avec près de 100 millions d’habitants. A travers cette étude, nous voudrions d’abord évaluer l’ampleur de ces mutations opé- rées par l’Ouganda depuis quelques années et les enjeux économiques, politiques et di- plomatiques qu’elles comportent pour l’ensemble de la zone.
  • Uganda Date: 30 October 2008

    Uganda Date: 30 October 2008

    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: UGA33919 Country: Uganda Date: 30 October 2008 Keywords: Uganda – Uganda People’s Defence Force – Intelligence agencies – Chieftaincy Military Intelligence (CMI) – Politicians This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. Please provide any information on the following people: 2. Noble Mayombo (Director of Intelligence). 3. Leo Kyanda (Deputy Director of CMI). 4. General Mugisha Muntu. 5. Jack Sabit. 6. Ben Wacha. 7. Dr Okungu (People’s Redemption Army). 8. Mr Samson Monday. 9. Mr Kyakabale. 10. Deleted. RESPONSE 1. Please provide information on the Uganda Peoples Defence Force (Ugandan Army)/Intelligence Agencies and a branch of the Army called Chieftaincy Military Intelligence, especially its history, structure, key officers. The Uganda Peoples Defence Force UPDF is headed by General Y Museveni and the Commander of the Defence Force is General Aronda Nyakairima; the Deputy Chief of the Defence Forces is Lt General Ivan Koreta and the Joint Chief of staff Brigadier Robert Rusoke.
  • Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda

    Rule by Law: Discriminatory Legislation and Legitimized Abuses in Uganda

    RULE BY LAW DIscRImInAtORy legIslAtIOn AnD legItImIzeD Abuses In ugAnDA Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: AFR 59/06/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Ugandan activists demonstrate in Kampala on 26 February 2014 against the Anti-Pornography Act. © Isaac Kasamani amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. Introduction
  • Radio Ownership and Its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda

    Radio Ownership and Its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda

    African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 THE VIEWS EXPRESSED MUST REPRESENT THOSE OF MANAGEMENT Radio Ownership and its Impact on Political Speech in Uganda 1 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Published by: (C) African Centre for Media Excellence For more information contact: African Centre for Media Excellence (ACME) Plot 124 Nanjala Road, Soya-Bunga P. O. Box 11283 Kampala Tel: +256 392 731 067 Fax: +256 392 254 167 Email: [email protected] Website: www.acme-ug.org Layout and Printing Graphic Mutations Ltd., Kampala (U) Tel: +256 414 691 238 / 752 436 317 Email: [email protected] 2 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Acknowledgement This study was conducted and authored by George W. Lugalambi (Ph.D), Bernard Tabaire, and Peter Nyanzi. The project was supervised by Peter G. Mwesige (Ph.D). We would like to thank Freedom House for supporting the study and the printing of this report. We would also like to thank the Uganda Communications Commission and FM radio station owners who agreed to be interviewed for their co-operation and support. 3 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Contents Introduction Objectives of the study The approach Access to radio during political campaigns The space for critical political discourse The role of regulation Conclusion: Implications for media freedom and political speech References About ACME 4 African Centre for Media Excellence - June 2011 Introduction The question of who owns the media has in recent years become a growing subject of debate and contention in Uganda. The need to address this question gained greater urgency during the 2011 elections as it emerged that access to radio, in particular, appeared to be influenced by political considerations rather more explicitly than at other times and in previous elections.
  • The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme

    The Republic of Uganda in the Supreme

    5 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. O1 OF 2016 (CORAM: KATUREEBE, C.J, TUMWESIGYE, KISAAKYE, 10 ARACH AMOKO, NSHIMYE, MWANGUSYA,OPIO-AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA-EKIRIKUBINZA, JJ.SC.) AMAMA MBABAZI …………………………………….PETITIONER VERSUS 15 YOWERI KAGUTA MUSEVENI ……………. 1stRESPONDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION ……………… 2ndRESPONDENT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ………………… 3rd RESPONDENT PROFESSOR OLOKA ONYANGO & 8 ORS………..AMICI 20 CURIAE DETAILED REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT The Petitioner, who was one of the candidates in the presidential 25 election that was held on the 18th February, 2016 petitioned the 1 5 Supreme Court under the Constitution, the Presidential Elections Act, 2000 and the Electoral Commission Act, 1997 (hereinafterreferred to as the PEA and the ECA, respectively). He challenged the result of the election and sought a declaration that Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, the 1st Respondent, was not 10 validly elected and an order that the election be annulled. On the 31st March 2016, we delivered our decision in line with the Constitutional timeline imposed on the Court to render its judgment within 30 days from the date of filing the petition. We were not, however, in a position to give detailed reasons for our 15 findings and conclusion. We found that the 1st Respondent was validly elected as President in accordance with Article 104 of the Constitution and Section 59 of the PEA. Accordingly, we unanimously dismissed the petition. We made no order as to costs. 20 We promised to give the detailed reasons at a later date, which we now give in this judgment. Background The 18thFebruary 2016 General Elections were the 3rd since the re-introduction of multiparty politics in Uganda as the country 25 shifted from the movement system.
  • Republic of Uganda

    Republic of Uganda

    REPUBLIC OF UGANDA REPORT ON THE 2005/2006 GENERAL ELECTIONS BY THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION SUBMITTED TO PARLIAMENT THROUGH THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12 (1) (0) OF THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION ACT NO. 3, 1997 AUGUST 2006 REPORT ON THE 2005/2006 GENERAL ELECTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUND 1 1.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION (COMMISSION) 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF THE COMMISSION 1 1.3 RE-INTRODUCTION OF MULTI-PARTY POLITICS 2 1.4 COMPOSITION OF ELECTION POSITIONS AT VARIOUS LEVELS 3 1.4.2 The Presidency 3 1.4.3 The National Parliament 3 1.4.4 Local Governments’ Councils 4 1.5 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 4 1.5.2 The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 4 1.5.3 Working Relationship with Political Parties/Organizations 5 CHAPTER TWO: FINANCE AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FOR THE 2005/2006 GENERAL ELECTIONS 7 2.2 FINANCE 7 2.2.1 Government Budgetary Support 7 2.2.2 Donor Budgetary Support 9 2.3 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 11 2.3.1 HUMAN RESOURCES 11 2.3.1.1 Permanent Staff 11 2.3.1.2 Temporary Deployment 11 2.4 PROCUREMENT AND PRINTING OF ELECTION MATERIALS 12 2.4.1 Procurement of Goods and Services 12 2.4.2 Printing of Election Materials 13 2.5 PACKING AND DISPATCH OF POLLING MATERIALS 13 2.5.1 Packing 13 REPORT ON THE 2005/2006 GENERAL ELECTIONS 2.5.2 Dispatch of Polling Materials 13 2.6 TRANSPORT 13 2.7 SECURITY DURING THE ELECTION PERIOD 15 CHAPTER THREE: VOTER EDUCATION, TRAINING AND PUBLIC AWARENESS 16 3.1 VOTER EDUCATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS 16 3.1.2 Methods of Dissemination
  • List of Abbreviations

    List of Abbreviations

    HRNJ - Uganda Human Rights Network for Journalists-Uganda (HRNJ-Uganda) Press Freedom Index Report April 2011 2 HRNJ - Uganda Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................... 5 Part I: Background .............................................................................................. 7 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 7 Elections and Media .............................................................................................. 7 Research Objective ............................................................................................... 8 Methodology ......................................................................................................... 8 Quality check ......................................................................................................... 8 Limitations ............................................................................................................. 9 Part II: Media freedom during national elections in Uganda ................................ 11 Media as a campaign tool ................................................................................... 11 Role of regulatory bodies ................................................................................... 12 Media self censorship ......................................................................................... 14 Censorship of social media
  • ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION to the PRESIDENTIAL and PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in UGANDA (18 February 2016)

    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION to the PRESIDENTIAL and PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in UGANDA (18 February 2016)

    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION TO THE PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN UGANDA (18 February 2016) Report by JO LEINEN, Chair of the Delegation Annexes: A. Programme B. European Parliament Election Observation Delegation Statement C. EU Election Observation Mission Preliminary findings and conclusions Following an invitation from the Ugandan authorities and the subsequent authorisation of the Conference of Presidents, a seven member EP delegation was sent to Uganda to participate in the 2 observation of the 2016 general elections. The delegation conducted its activities in Uganda from 15 to 20 February 2016 and was integrated into the EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) led by Chief Observer Eduard Kukan. The EP delegation was chaired by Jo Leinen (S&D, DE), and was composed of Mariya Gabriel (EPP, BG), David McAllister (EPP, DE), Norbert Neuser (S&D, DE), Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR, PL), Javier Nart (ALDE, ES) and Igor Šoltes (Greens/EFA, SL). In the first part of the programme, MEPs were briefed by the EU Heads of Mission and by the members of the EU EOM core team on the political background, the legal electoral framework, the security environment and the media landscape. Meetings were also organised with members of the Electoral Commission and with representatives of political parties, civil society and other international election observation missions. MEPs also had the opportunity to meet incumbent President Museveni as well as his two main presidential contenders: Dr Kizza Besigye from the Forum for Democratic Change and Mr Amama Mbabazi from the Democratic Alliance/Go Forward. I. The context of the 2016 elections The 2016 presidential and parliamentary elections were the third elections held under the multi-party system.
  • UGANDA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service

    UGANDA COUNTRY of ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service

    UGANDA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT COI Service Date 20 April 2011 UGANDA DATE Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN UGANDA FROM 3 FEBRUARY TO 20 APRIL 2011 Useful news sources for further information REPORTS ON UGANDA PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 3 FEBRUARY AND 20 APRIL 2011 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Map ........................................................................................................................ 1.06 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Political developments: 1962 – early 2011 ......................................................... 3.01 Conflict with Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA): 1986 to 2010.............................. 3.07 Amnesty for rebels (Including LRA combatants) .............................................. 3.09 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................... 4.01 Kampala bombings July 2010 ............................................................................. 4.01 5. CONSTITUTION.......................................................................................................... 5.01 6. POLITICAL SYSTEM ..................................................................................................
  • Uganda Country Report

    Uganda Country Report

    Informal Governance and Corruption – Transcending the Principal Agent and Collective Action Paradigms Uganda Country Report Frederick Golooba-Mutebi| July 2018 Basel Institute on Governance Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE This research has been funded by the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID) and the British Academy through the British Academy/DFID Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the British Academy or DFID. 1 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Informal practices as drivers of corruption 4 1.2 Rationale and conceptual approach 4 1.3 Studying informal practices as drivers of corruption in Uganda 5 2 Background on informal networks in Uganda 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 The electoral dimension 7 2.3 Pre-multi party election period 8 2.4 The Multi-party period 10 2.5 Links between the competition for power, use of informal practices and corruption 11 3 Use of the three Cs as mechanisms to manage the networks 13 3.1 Co-optation and Control 13 3.1.1 Top-down co-optation: appointments (disbursement of resources and favours) for supporters and opposition figures 13 3.2 Horizontal co-optation of business interests 16 3.2.1 Co-opting members of the business community 16 3.2.2 Rewarding supporters 18 3.2.3 NRM as a vehicle for the exercise of informal governance 18 3.3 Camouflage 19 3.4 The bottom-up view 20 4 Concluding
  • Cabinet-Ministers-Fr

    Cabinet-Ministers-Fr

    SPECIALSECTION SPECIALSECTION SPECIALSECTION National Jubilee Celebration/ New Vision, Tuesday , October 9, 2012 91 MINISTRY OF LANDS, HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Minister Minister of State, Housing Permanent Secretary Hon Daudi Migereko Hon Sam Engola Mr. Gabindadde - Musoke Republic of Uganda, His Excellency General Yoweri Kaguta Museveni, The Vice President His Excellency Hon. Edward Kiwanuka Ssekandi, Prime Minister Rt. Hon. Amama Mbabazi, and the Citizens of Uganda on this historic occasion when we celebrate the GOLDEN JUBILEE INDEPENDENCE ANNIVERSARY. The Ministry assures all Ugandans of total commitment towards transformation of Uganda from a Peasant Economy to an Industrialized Country with a developed Services Sector. Long Live Uganda. Cabinet Ministers who have Provided Political direction from October 1962 up to date NAME MINISTER MINISTER OF STATE / DEPUTY PERIOD OF SERVICE Hon Francis Ayume Minister of Lands, Housing & Urban July 1996 – Nov 1998 Development Hon J.W Lwamafa Minister of Minerals & Water Resources May 1962 – 1964 Hon Jovino Ayumu Akaki Minister of State for Lands, July 1996 – Nov 1998 Hon B.K. Kirya Minister of Minerals & Water Resources 1964 – 1965 Housing & Urban Development Hon M.L Choudry Minister of Minerals & Water Resources May 1966 – Jan 1971 Hon Henry Muganwa Kajura Minister of Water, Lands & Environment Nov 1998 – May 2002 Hon Lt. Col E.W. Oryema Minister of Minerals & Water Resources Feb 1971 – Jan 1974 Hon Baguma Isoke Minister of State for Lands Nov 1998 – Jun 2006 Hon Lt. Col E.W. Oryema Minister of Land and Water Resources Jan 1974 – Feb 1977 Hon E. Akika Othieno Minister of State for Water Nov 1998 –Feb 1999 Hon Col.
  • “When I Was Tortured, No One Came Out”

    “When I Was Tortured, No One Came Out”

    “When I was tortured, no one came out” Free Expression and Assembly in Peril ahead of 2016 Polls “When I was tortured, no one came out” Free Expression and Assembly in Peril ahead of 2016 Polls TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: Introduction Introduction 2 Glossary 4 Executive Summary 6 Methodology 7 Map of areas where research was conducted 8 Key Recommendations 9 PART II: Context Background: The Road to 2016 Polls 11 Related Violations in Recent Years 12 Recruitment of unregulated militia groups ahead of polls 13 PART III: Violations and threats against expression and assembly freedoms Silencing of expression freedoms • Intimidation, harassment, and threats 15 • Physical violence and assaults during rallies 18 • Arrests, detentions, and disappearances 19 Organized clampdown on assembly freedoms • Surveillance, harassment, and intimidation 21 • Physical violence and assaults during rallies 23 • Arrests, prolonged detentions, and disappearances 28 • Unfair trials 31 Threats to civil society groups • Concerns in passed NGO Act 2015 32 • Surveillance, ad-hoc investigations, and harassment 33 PART IV: International, regional and national law standards • Freedom of Expression and Media 36 • Freedom of Assembly and Association 38 PART V: General Recommendations 40 • To the President of Uganda 40 • To the Parliament of Uganda 40 • To the Uganda Police Force 40 • To the Directorate of Public Prosecutions 41 • To the Courts of Judicature 41 • To the Development Partners 41 To the ACHPR and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedoms of Peaceful Assembly and of •