Notes Towards Autonomous Geographies: Creation, Resistance and Self-Management As Survival Tactics Jenny Pickerill1* and Paul Chatterton2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes Towards Autonomous Geographies: Creation, Resistance and Self-Management As Survival Tactics Jenny Pickerill1* and Paul Chatterton2 Progress in Human Geography 30, 6 (2006) pp. 1–17 Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics Jenny Pickerill1* and Paul Chatterton2 1Department of Geography, Leicester University, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK 2Department of Geography, Leeds University, University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Abstract: This paper’s focus is what we call ‘autonomous geographies’ – spaces where there is a desire to constitute non-capitalist, collective forms of politics, identity and citizenship. These are created through a combination of resistance and creation, and a questioning and challenging of dominant laws and social norms. The concept of autonomy permits a better understanding of activists’ aims, practices and achievements in alter-globalization movements. We explore how autonomous geographies are multiscalar strategies that weave together spaces and times, constituting in-between and overlapping spaces, blending resistance and creation, and combining theory and practice. We flesh out two examples of how autonomous geographies are made through collective decision-making and autonomous social centres. Autonomous geographies provide a useful toolkit for understanding how spectacular protest and everyday life are combined to brew workable alternatives to life beyond capitalism. Key words: activism, alternative spaces, autonomy, creation, everyday life, interstitial, localization, resistance. I Introduction increasingly employed by anti-capitalist This paper is about what we call activists such as the Wombles, Disobidientis ‘autonomous geographies’ – those spaces and Dissent! to structure and articulate their where people desire to constitute non- practices and aims. At the same time, a rein- capitalist, egalitarian and solidaristic forms of vigoration and reinterpretation of autonomist political, social, and economic organization Marxism has provided a pathway towards a through a combination of resistance and cre- more socially just society (Cleaver, 1979; ation. Inspired by groups such as the Mexican Katsiaficas, 1997; Hardt and Negri, 2000; Zapatistas, the concept of autonomy is being 2005; Wright, 2002). *Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] © 2006 SAGE Publications 10.1177/0309132506071516 2 Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and self-management We have coined the term ‘autonomous seeks to challenge, disrupt, and reimagine our geographies’ as part of a substantive and lin- understandings of political, economic and guistic intervention, responding to multiple cultural processes (Featherstone, 2003). crises. We make no excuses for this; calling Alter-globalization is the preferred term as it forth autonomy does not simply lead to con- emphasizes anti-capitalist and social justice crete solutions to change the world. Nor is movements’ creativity, celebrating the move- the term a panacea; to offer it as such would ment’s transnationality and their solidarity sustain the problems of blueprints which networks. This multiscalar and multifaceted plague the contemporary world. However, activism manifests itself through global and autonomous geographies are part of a vocab- regional convergences (such as People’s ulary of urgency, hope and inspiration, a call Global Action meetings or large-scale demon- to action that we can dismantle wage labour, strations coinciding with ministerial meetings the oil economy, or representative democ- of the G8, the World Trade Organization or racy, and that thousands of capable and the European Union), through localized workable micro-examples exist. A focus on autonomous spaces and alternative processes autonomy is simultaneously a documentation (such as social centres, eco-villages, alterna- of where we are, and a projection of where tive currencies, food production, housing we could be. As a narrative of realism and cooperatives and self-education), and experi- idealism, this paper – and our research – is an ments in non-hierarchical organization and attempt to document radical and workable consensus-based decision-making. Most ‘futures in the present’ (Cleaver, 1993) and importantly, we explore the role of everyday to find escape routes out of this capitalist practices in these movements’ constitution, existence (Gibson-Graham, 1996). as they work alongside – indeed comprise The paper’s objectives are threefold. First, vital building blocks for – mass protests. in order to understand autonomy’s impor- Second, a growing critique of movements’ tance, we need to explore its usage, meanings failure to suggest, or indeed deliver, workable and widespread practices in activists’ every- alternatives stems from autonomous activists’ day activities. Second, we discuss how reluctance to build permanent organizations, autonomy can facilitate a more nuanced formulate strategies, or adopt traditional understanding of anti-capitalist movements. representative structures. Hence, the Finally, a politics of hope infuses this paper; mainstream media often treat them making autonomous geographies comprises inaccurately, seeking the familiarity of spokes- important moments of resistance. people, manifestos and organizational Autonomous practices have already resulted coherence. Some scholars have also critiqued in real changes for some participants – for their localization, arguing that local responses example, social centres’ provision of space are inadequate to challenge globalization and food, and survival strategies in Argentina (Bauman, 2002; Peck and Tickell, 2002; (Chatterton, 2005). Beyond examples of Cameron and Palan, 2004). To clarify, we pro- success, we look further than constrained pose to use the concept of autonomous geog- pragmatic visions and ‘interrupt space and raphies to understand alter-globalization time . to open up perspectives on what movements as a progressive politics, not might be’ (Pinder, 2002: 229). grounded through a particular spatial strategy Our focus on autonomy is an attempt to but as a relational and contextual entity clarify what can seem a diffuse concept, and a drawing together resistance, creation and way to explore the materialization of utopian solidarity across multiple times and places. visions. First, autonomy has become one of We begin by defining autonomy. First, the hallmarks of varied activism, forming part autonomy is a contextual and situated ten- of the alter-globalization movement which dency which has many trajectories. We are Jenny Pickerill and Paul Chatterton 3 concerned with movements that seek free- heteronomy). Hence, we are unashamedly dom and connection beyond nation states, commentators on – and also embedded par- international financial institutions, global cor- ticipants within – autonomous projects. Our porations and neoliberalism – what we might encounters are as academic-activists, under- otherwise call global anti-capitalism. Second, taking embedded or participatory forms of autonomy is a sociospatial strategy, in which action research which are empathic and inter- complex networks and relations are woven active rather than extractive and objective between many autonomous projects across (see Pain, 2003). This contact, however, does time and space, with potential for translocal not blind us to activism’s limitations; in fact solidarity networks. Third, the interstitial some of the strongest critiques have emerged nature of autonomy means the lack of an ‘out from within such movements.1 there’ from which to build autonomy, hence creating a constant interplay between auton- II Defining autonomy omy and non-autonomy tendencies. Fourth, The word ‘autonomous’ comes from the autonomy is resistance and creation, a Greek autos-nomos, meaning ‘self-legislation’. tendency that proposes but also refuses. It shares many similarities with anarchism, Finally, autonomy is praxis, a commitment to meaning ‘without government’. Together the revolution of the everyday. A necessary they combine to make a powerful toolkit for rejection of routes to power means a faith in social and environmental justice politics (see collective process, non-hierarchical decision- Joll, 1979; Kumar, 1987; Cook and Pepper, making and mutual aid. In the second part of 1990; Marshall, 1992; Bookchin, 1996; Blunt the paper, we look at how autonomy is made and Wills, 2000; Sheehan, 2003; Berkmann, and remade by activists in two examples 2003). In this section, we examine autonomy (decision-making structures at a recent in five main ways: as a concept comprising convergence space; autonomous social different tendencies and trajectories; as a centres). We conclude by considering the temporal-spatial strategy between and power and limitations of autonomy and ask beyond the ‘global versus local’axis; as a form ‘to what extent can autonomous geographies of interstitial politics; as a process of resist- challenge everyday realities of capitalist ways ance and creation; and as a coherent attempt of organizing society?’ at praxis with its strong sense of prefigurative The inspiration for this piece has been per- politics and commitment to the revolution of sonal, political and academic (Chatterton, the everyday. 2002; Chatterton and Hollands, 2003; Pickerill, 2003a; 2003b; 2004; Gordon and 1 Autonomies: tendencies and trajectories Chatterton, 2004; Chatterton, 2005). A Autonomy is moveable, historically specific, strong body of geographical work has sought highly contextual and contested and used to to be socially relevant and pursue participa- pursue a variety of ends and ideologies tory and ethical
Recommended publications
  • Real Democracy in the Occupy Movement
    NO STABLE GROUND: REAL DEMOCRACY IN THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT ANNA SZOLUCHA PhD Thesis Department of Sociology, Maynooth University November 2014 Head of Department: Prof. Mary Corcoran Supervisor: Dr Laurence Cox Rodzicom To my Parents ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is an outcome of many joyous and creative (sometimes also puzzling) encounters that I shared with the participants of Occupy in Ireland and the San Francisco Bay Area. I am truly indebted to you for your unending generosity, ingenuity and determination; for taking the risks (for many of us, yet again) and continuing to fight and create. It is your voices and experiences that are central to me in these pages and I hope that you will find here something that touches a part of you, not in a nostalgic way, but as an impulse to act. First and foremost, I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Laurence Cox, whose unfaltering encouragement, assistance, advice and expert knowledge were invaluable for the successful completion of this research. He was always an enormously responsive and generous mentor and his critique helped sharpen this thesis in many ways. Thank you for being supportive also in so many other areas and for ushering me in to the complex world of activist research. I am also grateful to Eddie Yuen who helped me find my way around Oakland and introduced me to many Occupy participants – your help was priceless and I really enjoyed meeting you. I wanted to thank Prof. Szymon Wróbel for debates about philosophy and conversations about life as well as for his continuing support.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchists in the Late 1990S, Was Varied, Imaginative and Often Very Angry
    Price £3.00 Issue 230 Late 2009 An end to the safety net Labour is stripping away the last of Britain’s social wage — is there anything left to stop them? Front page pictures: Garry Knight, Photos8.com, Libertinus Yomango, Theory: Reportage: Also inside After the How Oaxaca revolution, has learned this issue... what next? to wage war Editorial Welcome to issue 230 of Black Flag, the fifth published by the current Editorial Collective. Since our re-launch in October 2007 feedback has generally tended to be positive. Black Flag continues to be published twice a year, and we are still aiming to become quarterly. However, this is easier said than done as we are a small group. So at this juncture, we make our usual appeal for articles, more bodies to get physically involved, and yes, financial donations would be more than welcome! This issue also coincides with the 25th anniversary of the Anarchist Bookfair – arguably the longest running and largest in the world? It is certainly the biggest date in the UK anarchist calendar. To celebrate the event we have included an article written by organisers past and present, which it is hoped will form the kernel of a general history of the event from its beginnings in the Autonomy Club. Well done and thank you to all those who have made this event possible over the years, we all have Walk this way: The Black Flag ladybird finds it can be hard going to balance trying many fond memories. to organise while keeping yourself safe – but it’s worth it.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbols of Resistance
    Symbols of Resistance: A Study of Anarchist Space and Identity in Philadelphia By Ariel Henderson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in anthropology Bryn Mawr College May, 2003 1 Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank the activists who were generous enough to give me their time and advice. I would also like to thank Professor Kilbride for his tireless tutelage and Professor Hart for her willing input, as well as Professors Takenaka, Pashigian, and Woodhouse-Beyer for their help during the preliminary stages of preparation. Also, thank you to the ladies of my senior seminar class. Finally allow me to thank everyone who has supported me throughout this process: Lloyd 91 and all my friends with cars (late night Wawa runs), My sister Naomi, Josh, Minka, and Carlo. 2 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Methodology Relevant Literature Chapter 1: Histories of People and Places 11 Anarchism in Philadelphia A Philadelphia Anarchist Anarchist Places: The Wooden Shoe Anarchist Places: The A-Space The Future of Anarchism in Philadelphia Chapter 2: Anarchist Identity Localized in Place 21 Beginning Fieldwork Place and Identity Theoretical Reflection Autonomy and Separateness Turning Anarchist Values into Public Knowledge Conclusion Chapter 3: The Individual and the Collective 31 Autonomy, Affinity Groups and Anonymity Consensus and Communal Space Leadership Conclusion Chapter 4: The Cultural Roots of Anarchism 40 An American Ideal: Individualism Individuality in Modern Social Movements Theoretical Discussion Current Social Movement Theory: Two Camps Interpretation: Symbolic Action Utopia: Personal Observations Conclusion Conclusion 51 3 Abstract During the period from January 20th to May 3rd I conducted participant observation research at two different locations in Philadelphia – the Wooden Shoe bookstore and the A-Space.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Flames
    FIRE AND FLAMES FIRE AND FLAMES a history of the german autonomist movement written by Geronimo introduction by George Katsiaficas translation and afterword by Gabriel Kuhn FIRE AND FLAMES: A History of the German Autonomist Movement c. 2012 the respective contributors. This edition c. 2012 PM Press Originally published in Germany as: Geronimo. Feuer und Flamme. Zur Geschichte der Autonomen. Berlin/Amsterdam: Edition ID-Archiv, 1990. This translation is based on the fourth and final, slightly revised edition of 1995. ISBN: 978-1-60486-097-9 LCCN: 2010916482 Cover and interior design by Josh MacPhee/Justseeds.org Images provided by HKS 13 (http://plakat.nadir.org) and other German archives. PM Press PO Box 23912 Oakland, CA 94623 www.pmpress.org 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the USA on recycled paper by the Employee Owners of Thomson-Shore in Dexter, MI. www.thomsonshore.com CONTENTS Introduction 1 Translator’s Note and Glossary 9 Preface to the English-Language Edition 13 Background 17 ------- I. THE EMERGENCE OF AUTONOMOUS POLITICS IN WEST GERMANY 23 A Taste of Revolution: 1968 25 The Student Revolt 26 The Student Revolt and the Extraparliamentary Opposition 28 The Politics of the SDS 34 The Demise of the SDS 35 Militant Grassroots Currents 37 What Did ’68 Mean? 38 La sola soluzione la rivoluzione: Italy’s Autonomia Movement 39 What Happened in Italy in the 1960s? 39 From Marxism to Operaismo 40 From Operaio Massa to Operaio Sociale 42 The Autonomia Movement of 1977 43 Left Radicalism in the 1970s 47 “We Want Everything!”: Grassroots Organizing in the Factories 48 The Housing Struggles 52 The Sponti Movement at the Universities 58 A Short History of the K-Groups 59 The Alternative Movement 61 The Journal Autonomie 63 The Urban Guerrilla and Other Armed Groups 66 The German Autumn of 1977 69 A Journey to TUNIX 71 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomism and Anarchy
    Toward Anarchist and Autonomist Marxist Geographies Nathan Clough1 University of Minnesota, Duluth [email protected] Renata Blumberg University of Minnesota, Twin Cities [email protected] Introduction In recent months, the Occupy movement has reinvigorated the imagination of the Left in the United States and elsewhere, by moving radical politics in new directions and creating spaces based upon participatory and non-hierarchical modes of organizing. Anarchist, autonomist Marxist and libertarian socialist ideas have played critical roles in imagining and enacting Occupy spaces, achieving renewed influence in the process. Writing about this turning point in politics for The Nation, Nathan Schneider states: “The anarchists’ way of operating was changing our very idea of what politics could be in the first place. This was exhilarating” (2011 unpaginated online source). This volume brings together geographic scholarship on anarchism and autonomist Marxism for the first time. Even before Occupy Wall Street, anarchism and autonomist Marxism as political ideologies and radical methodologies have been on the rise in the West at least since the 1999 World Trade Organization 1 Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Towards Anarchist and Autonomous Marxist Geographies 336 protests in Seattle, when anarchistic protesters exploded onto the international media landscape due to their successful application of direct action tactics to stop the trade ministerial meeting (De Armond, 2001; Sheppard, 2002; Graeber, 2004; Levi, 2006). That anarchism and autonomist Marxism have been deeply implicated in the alter-globalization movement of the past decade cannot be denied. For example, radical movements such as Ya Basta!, the edu-factory movement, European movements of students and precarious workers, and the contemporary Industrial Workers of the World union in the United States have integrated autonomist Marxist theory into their broadly anti-authoritarian and anarcho- syndicalist perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Diss 2
    Rupture and Representation: Migrant Workers, Unions and the State in China By Eli David Friedman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Peter Evans, Chair Professor Kim Voss Professor Ching Kwan Lee Professor Kevin O’Brien Fall 2011 Abstract Rupture and Representation: Migrant Workers, Unions and the State in China By Eli David Friedman Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Peter Evans, Chair This project begins with a simple observation: during the first decade of the 21st century, worker resistance in China continued to increase rapidly despite the fact that certain segments of the state began moving in a pro-labor direction. This poses a problem for the Polanyian theory of the countermovement, which conflates social resistance to the market with actual decommodification and incorporation of labor. I then pose the question, why is labor strong enough to win major legislative and policy concessions from the state, but not strong enough to significantly benefit from these policies? The “partial” nature of the countermovement can be explained with reference to the dynamics of labor politics in China, and specifically the relationship between migrant workers, unions, and the state, or what I refer to as “appropriated representation.” Because unions in China are an invention of the state, they have good access to policy makers but are highly illegitimate amongst their own membership, i.e. strong at the top, weak at the bottom. Labor’s impotence within enterprises means that pro-labor laws and collective agreements frequently go un-enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • What Remains of the Italian Left of the 1970S? Jonathan Mullins
    What Remains of the Italian Left of the 1970s? Jonathan Mullins Suddenly a photograph reaches me; it animates me and I animate it. So that is how I must name the attraction which makes it exist: an animation. The photograph itself is in no way animated (I do not believe in ‘life-like’ photographs), but it animates me: this is what creates every adventure. —Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida1 In September 1977, 20,000 young leftists descended upon Bologna for a convention at the Palasport stadium. The convention is largely identified with the end of the movement of 1977, in which youth on the far left broke with the Italian Communist Party (PCI), ridiculed institutional politics and the very idea of the social contract, and adopted forms of direct action. It is known for its mass protests, which usually ended in confrontations with the police in the streets, and for its broadcasts, via free radio stations, of messages of refusal that mixed aesthetic forms and political discourse. These young people had come to Bologna, the historical stronghold of the PCI, to protest the police repression of the movement, to re-vitalize collective forms of dissent and just be together. This scene was one of the last hurrahs of non-violent, collective far leftist revolt of 1970s Italy. It was captured in forty- nine minutes of unedited 16mm footage by the commercial production company Unitelefilm that is held at the Audio-Visual Archive for Democratic and Labor Movements (AAMOD) in Rome.2 The footage is remarkable for its recording of what happened on the margins of the Palasport convention and not the convention itself; the viewer never sees any of the orations, banners or charged publics that gathered at the Palasport stadium where the convention took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Theory, Critical Pedagogy, and Radical Possibilities Abraham P
    The time for action is now! Anarchist theory, critical pedagogy, and radical possibilities Abraham P. DeLeon University of Connecticut, USA "When the rich assemble to concern themselves with the business of the poor it is called charity. When the poor assemble to concern themselves with the business of the rich it is called anarchy." Paul Richard Rudolf Rocker (1989), a 19th century anarchist, proclaimed that anarchist theory was separate from a state driven, hierarchical socialism in that, “…when a revolutionary situation arises they [the people] will be capable of taking the socio-economic organism into their own hands and remaking it according to Socialist principles” (p. 86). Arising from the idea that small cooperatives of people could form without the need of a coercive and hierarchical state, Rocker envisioned a society that was based on cooperation, community participation, and mutual aid. Rocker’s vision of society, and other anarchist-communist (or anarcho-syndicalist) theorists, is especially relevant in a time that has seen a “war on terror” that was not supported by the global community, the rollback of civil liberties with legislation such as The Patriot Act, and educational laws such as No Child Left Behind that are focusing on narrowly-defined “standards” for public schooling. Historically, anarchists have been marginalized in academic literature, but have still been involved in radical political struggles throughout the world (Bowen, 2005; Chomsky, 2005; Day, 2004; Goaman, 2005). Within radical circles, anarchist literature has begun to gain popularity over the past several years (Bowen & Purkis, 2005). An anarchist presence can be seen in the anti-globalization movement, the “Black Bloc” protests against the IMF and World Bank, and other smaller, localized resistance efforts such as Anti-Racist Action (ARA) and Food Not Bombs (Bowen, 2005; Goaman, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Insurrection? Destituent Power and Ontological Anarchy in Agamben and Stirner
    What is an Insurrection? Destituent power and ontological anarchy in Agamben and Stirner By Saul Newman Introduction The aim of this paper is to develop a theoretical understanding of the insurrection as a central concept in radical politics. If one looks at recent uprisings around the world – from Occupy Wall Street, to the Indignados in Spain, to ‘hacktivist’ networks like Anonymous - one observes a form of action and mobilisation reducible neither to simple acts of civil disobedience, nor to a revolutionary model of politics. Instead, these movements signify a kind of withdrawal from formal systems of power; their emphasis is more on the creation of autonomous political spaces and modes of interaction than on the construction of political agendas and the representation of demands to the state. By contrast the idea of revolution, as the seizure of political power by an organised vanguard party, seems less easy to appeal to today. Despite attempts recently by some political theorists to resuscitate and rethink the idea of the vanguard party as a mode of political organisation - particularly in the context of mass mobilisations like Occupy (see for instance Dean 2012) – others suggest that this has been entirely superseded by a new model of emancipatory politics, in which self-organisation and the desire for autonomy from state institutions are the defining features (Graeber 2009, 2014; Castells 2015). Whereas the revolution is an instrumental form of action which aims, through organised political force, to seize the reins of government and use state power to transform the totality of social relations – that is, to constitute a new society – insurrection works within the fabric of existing social relations, opening up spaces of resistance and autonomy that are in a sense immanent within it (see Caygill 2013, 199).
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENTS.Pdf
    UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Student movements Author(s) Dooley, Brendan Editor(s) Stearns, Peter N. Publication date 2001 Original citation Dooley, B. (2001) 'Student movements', in Stearns, P. M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of European Social History. New York: Gale Group. pp. 301-310. Type of publication Book chapter Link to publisher's http://www.cengage.com/search/productOverview.do;jsessionid=A629B version B39D6DFA2EC61700F318D779247?N=197+4294916402&Ntk=P_EPI &Ntt=1803783465183769497013824211871588061963&Ntx=mode%2 Bmatchallpartial Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2001, Gale Group, a part of Cengage Learning, Inc. Reproduced by permission. www.cengage.com/permissions Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/3663 from Downloaded on 2021-09-28T15:45:15Z 1 STUDENT MOVEMENTS When French students took to the streets once again in October, 1998, they brought to a close a thirty-year period of academic unrest that has left an indelible mark on modern culture. To the extent that students as a group and student movements as a category of social action can be identified throughout European culture from the Renaissance to the present, this most recent period in the history of student movements has been unique. Nonetheless, coordinated behavior on the part of those enrolled in educational institutions has always played an important role in larger processes in society. Students alone, as a social elite with specific requirements and specific connections to the institutions of power, have created episodes of protest with a lasting impact on the lives of subsequent generations of students as well as on their societies at large.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Tradition [Pdf]
    Contents ACF: the first ten years 3 From 1st International and up to Spanish Revolution 6 WW2 and after: Socialisme ou Barbarie, hungary 56, Noir et Rouge, leading up to May 68 11 France 68 and its aftermath 16 New Left, Platformism, Wildcat 21 Miners Strike, Class War, Social Ecology and Greens, COBAS 23 This pamphlet comprises articles in the series “In the Tradition” that first appeared in Organise, the magazine of the Anarchist Federation between 1999 and 2004. It also includes, as an introduction, “the ACF: the first ten years” which originally appeared in Organise 42 in 1996 when the AF was still known as the Anarchist Communist Federation. Anarchist Communist Editions ACE Pamphlet No. 19 Published by the Anarchist Federation, BM Anarfed, London WC1N 3XX Email: [email protected] Web: www.afed.org.uk June 2009 In the tradition Page 3 ACF: the first ten years THE SHIPWRECK OF anarchist communism in the late 70s meant that there was no anarchist communist organisation, not even a skeletal one, that could relate to the riots of 1981 and to the miners strike of 1984-5 as well as to mobilisations like the Stop the City actions of 1984. But in autumn 1984 two comrades, one a veteran of the ORA/AWA/LCG, had returned from France where they had been living and working and where they had been involved in the libertarian communist movement. A decision was made to set up the Libertarian Communist Discussion Group (LCDG) with the aim of creating a specific organisation. Copies of the Organisational Platform of the Libertarian Communists, left over from the AWA/LCG days, were distributed to bookshops, with a contact address for the Anarchist-Communist Discussion Group (ACDG).
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Revolution Unfinished SK
    The Russian Revolution Unfinished SK Note:Enough is Enough is not organizing any of these events, we are publishing them for people across the US and Europe to be able to see what is going on and for documentation only. Enough is Enough! https://enoughisenough14.org “Whether one chooses to examine the opening phases of the French Revolution of 1789, the revolutions of 1848, the Paris Commune, the 1905 revolution in Russia, the overthrow of the Tsar in 1917, the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, the French general strike of 1968, the opening stages are generally the same: a period of ferment that explodes spontaneously into a mass upsurge.” —Murray Bookchin, “Myth of the Party: Bolshevik Mystification and Counter-Revolution,” Fifth Estate #272, May 1976 and in our anti-Marx issue, #393, Spring 2015. 2017 marks the hundredth anniversary of the Russian Revolution. This world-shaking upheaval occurred at the end of World War I, a time of self-emancipating uprisings in several countries that challenged the rule of capitalism and the state. Peasants and workers in Russia first went into the streets to demand bread and an end to involvement in the War, but the demonstrations and strikes quickly transformed from riot to rebellion and from there to a full scale revolution that very many hoped would lead to freedom and equality, challenging centuries of hierarchies of domination and economic exploitation. Although anarchists were in the minority in Russia, they nevertheless played a very influential and respected role alongside non-Bolshevik socialists in the discussions and actions that were taking place.
    [Show full text]