DOCSLIB.ORG

Ticket Issuing System Accreditation Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ticket Issuing System Accreditation Guide Ticket Issuing System Accreditation Guide Delivering IT platforms for tomorrow’s railwayfor tomorrow’s IT platforms Delivering Subject Ref: RSPA2000 Version: 02-03 Rail Settlement Plan Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 03069042 Ref: RSPA2000 02-03 Ticket Issuing System Date: 12-Aug-2019 Accreditation Guide Page: 2 of 38 Version History Version Date Author Comments 01-00 12-Sep-2008 C Dixon Issued after noting by RSSG on 11th September 2008 01-00-A/C 30-Dec-2008 Chris Updated mainly to clarify Product Record and transition testing, plus Querée earlier minor typos, layout, etc. Issued version proposed to be v01- 01. Updated following first external review. 01-00-D 10-Feb-2009 J Law Document reformatted for RSSG consideration. There were no material changes following the final external review. 01-01 19-Feb-2009 J Law Issued version following approval by RSSG 19/02/2009 02-00 04-Nov-2011 S Standley JIRA issues addressed. Updated following internal audit review. General cosmetic changes for clarification (STD-128). Section 4.2 updated to expand on TISA analyst checks (STD-317). TISA team rework. Paragraph 4.8.5 clarified timeframes for accreditation (STD- 63). Update to section 1.6 to include ref to ‘compliance standards’. New section 4.14 on ‘Post Accreditation Review’ which replaces previous version 01-01 section 4.11. External review comments addressed. Issued version following RSF approval. 02-00-A 21-Jan-2013 E Kelly Updated to reflect changes as per JIRA Issues STD-351 and STD- 492; Update to process diagrams and minor cosmetic changes. 02-00-B 20-Feb-2013 E Kelly Updated following internal review, addressing comments. 02-00-C 05-Jun-2013 N Barkham Updated to include changes to ASSIST. Pilot details now entered via ASSIST rather than RSPS9001. Pilot authorisation requests now sent via ASSIST. Rollout plan no longer required by RDG. 02-00-D 06-Aug-2013 E Kelly Updated in line with new corporate look and to address final outstanding comment on Compliance Review. 02-00-E 27-Aug-2013 E Kelly Updated following First External Review. 02-00-F 11-Sep-2013 E Kelly Updated following Final External Review. Sent to RSF for approval. 02-01 26-Sep-2013 E Kelly Issued version following approval by RSF. 02-01-A 12-Apr-2016 N Barkham New version created for Next Review Date. 02-01-B 27-Jun-2016 T Dagley Updated following internal review. 02-01-C 25-Aug-2016 N Barkham Updated following external review. 02-01-D 14-Sep-2016 T Dagley Updated following final external review; Sent to RSF for approval to issue. 02-02 29-Sep-2016 T Dagley Issued version following approval by RSF. 02-02-A 19-Mar-2019 J Wright Content re-ordered and restricted. Consolidation of content. New Accreditation Process diagrams. 02-02-B 03-Jun-2019 J Wright Updated to reflect comments from internal review. New JIRA categorisation added, following approval by FRG. ‘TIS Installation Form’ moved to RSPS4002: RDG Portal SDCI+ Delivery. © Rail Settlement Plan 2019 Commercial in Confidence Ref: RSPA2000 02-03 Ticket Issuing System Date: 12-Aug-2019 Accreditation Guide Page: 3 of 38 Version Date Author Comments 02-02-C 02-Jul-2019 J Wright Updated following first external review. Accreditation testing process diagram revised. 02-02-D 18-Jul-2019 J Wright Updated following final external review. W Smith Changes to formatting and wording to improve ease of reading. Further detail added to Accreditation Testing process diagram and narrative. 02-03 12-Aug-2019 J Wright Consolidation of Initial Discussion stage and amended start of Enhancement to Rail Retail System. Added contract and purchase order step to Scheduling Accreditation stage. Release Control The following personnel must formally approve the document prior to assigning a non-draft version number. Organisation Role Name RDG Document Owner RDG Head of Service Assurance RDG Document Owner RDG Accreditation Business Manager Distribution Organisation Role Name RDG Accreditation N/A N/A TOCs N/A N/A TIS Suppliers N/A N/A Copyright The copyright in this work is vested in RSP Ltd and the information contained herein is confidential. This work (either in whole or in part) must not be modified, reproduced, disclosed or disseminated to others or used for purposes other than that for which it is supplied, without the prior written permission of RSP Ltd. If this work or any part hereof is furnished to a third party by virtue of a contract with that party, use of this work by such party shall be governed by the express contractual terms between RSP Limited which is a party to that contract and the said party. © 2019 © Rail Settlement Plan 2019 Commercial in Confidence Ref: RSPA2000 02-03 Ticket Issuing System Date: 12-Aug-2019 Accreditation Guide Page: 4 of 38 Contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Our role ................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Purpose of this guide .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Intended audience .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 TIS definition ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Accreditation overview .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 RDG Standards ........................................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Scope of Accreditation ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Certification model ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Timescales .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3. Ticket issuing business process ........................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Accreditation requirements ................................................................................................................. 10 4. Accreditation process .....................................................................................................................11 4.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Initial discussion ................................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 TIS development ................................................................................................................................... 15 4.4 Application ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4.5 Scheduling accreditation ...................................................................................................................... 18 4.6 Compliance Review .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.7 Accreditation testing ............................................................................................................................ 22 4.8 Pilot ....................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.9 Certification .......................................................................................................................................... 29 4.10 Withdrawal of Accreditation ................................................................................................................ 31 5. Systems used by RDG accreditation ................................................................................................32 5.1 ASSIST ................................................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 JIRA ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 6. Costs ...............................................................................................................................................34 6.1 Accreditation charges ........................................................................................................................... 34 6.2 Pilot monitoring ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Rail Conditions of Travel
    i National Rail Conditions of Travel From 5 August 2018 NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL TABLE OF CONTENTS NATIONAL RAIL CONDITIONS OF TRAVEL Part A: A summary of the Conditions 3 Part B: Introduction 4 Conditions 5 Part C: Planning your journey and buying your Ticket 5 Part D: Using your Ticket 11 Part E: Making your Train Journey 15 Part F: Your refund and compensation rights 21 Part G: Special Conditions applying to Season Tickets 26 Part H: Lost Property 29 Appendix A: List of Train Companies to which the National Rail Conditions of Travel apply as at 5 August 2018 30 Appendix B: Definitions 31 Appendix C: Code of Practice: Arrangements for interview meetings with applicants in connection with duplicate season tickets 33 These National Rail Conditions of Travel apply from 5 August 2018. Any reference to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage on websites, Tickets, publications etc. refers to these National Rail Conditions of Travel. Part A: A summary of the Conditions The terms and conditions of these National Rail Conditions of Travel are set out below in Part C to Part H (the “Conditions”). They comprise the binding contract that comes into effect between you and the Train Companies1 that provide scheduled rail services on the National Rail Network, when you purchase a Ticket. This summary provides a quick overview of the key responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers contained in the contract. It is important, however, that you read the Conditions if you want a full understanding of the responsibilities of Train Companies and passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point
    www.pwc.co.uk Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) Prepared for Rail Delivery Group (RDG) and Cancellation November 2017 Minutes (CMs) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Context 3 2 Methodology 4 2.1 General approach 4 2.2 Principles for recalibrating MPWs and CMs 4 2.3 MPWs 8 2.4 CMs 9 3 Modelling 12 3.1 Process 12 3.2 Data sources and data cleansing 12 TOC engagement 12 MOIRA 12 PEARS 12 TOC specific data 13 3.3 Modelling MPWs 13 3.4 Modelling CMs 13 3.5 Model Review 14 Appendix 1 15 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Context The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is currently in the process of reviewing the access charges and related matters for Network Rail for Control Period 6 (CP6), which runs from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2024. As part of this review, the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) is leading the recalibration of Schedule 8, the performance regime which compensates train operators for the impact of unplanned service disruption. RDG commissioned PwC to undertake Phase 1 of the review, which focused on two key parameters used in the Schedule 8 performance regime1: Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) A Monitoring Point is a point on the network (almost always a station) at which the lateness of trains in a Service Code within a Service Group in a given direction (forward/reverse) is measured. MPWs are calculated for each Monitoring Point. They reflect the proportion of a Service Group’s passengers alighting and interchanging at that Monitoring Point and any preceding stations which are not captured by a Monitoring Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification
    Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification Document Ref: RSPS5046 Version: 03-00 Rail Settlement Plan Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 03069042 Ref: RSPS5046 03-00 Timetable Information Page: 2 of 39 Data Feed Interface Specification Date: 01-Aug-2018 Version History Version Date Author Comments 00-00-A 24-Jan-14 Edna Kelly First draft. 00-00-B 21-May-14 Edna Kelly Reviewed by iBlocks. JIRA STD-612: ‘Copyright text to be added’ 00-00-C 22-May-14 Edna Kelly Addressed internal review comments. Neil Barkham 00-00-D 05-Jun-14 Neil Barkham More internal review comments addressed. 00-00-E 16-Jul-14 Neil Barkham Final external review comments addressed. 01-00 04-Aug-14 Neil Barkham Issued. 01-00-A 19-Jan-17 Edna Kelly Next Review Date reached. 01-00-B 08-Feb-17 Neil Barkham Correction of file references (§ 2.4). Train schedule clarification (§ 5.2.3.3). 01-00-C 28-Mar-17 Neil Barkham External review comments addressed. 01-00-D 19-Apr-17 Neil Barkham Addressed final external review comment. 02-00 15-May-17 Neil Barkham Issued. 02-00-A 05-Mar-18 Neil Barkham Updated to include ‘Additional Fixed Links File’ and the ‘TOC Specific Interchange Times File’. General review. Restructure to put example data with the feed definitions. 02-00-B 16-Apr-18 Neil Barkham Updated after internal review. 02-00-C 22-May-18 Neil Barkham Updated after external review.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Market Review Consultation on the Potential Impacts of Regulation and Industry Arrangements and Practices for Ticket Selling
    Retail market review Consultation on the potential impacts of regulation and industry arrangements and practices for ticket selling September 2014 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 10 Purpose of the document 10 Why we are reviewing the regulations and industry arrangements and practices for ticket selling 11 Scope of the Review 12 Approach to the Review 13 Structure of the document 14 Questions for Chapter 1 15 2. Rail ticket buying and selling practices 16 Introduction 16 Ticket buying trends in rail 16 Ticket selling behaviour in rail 18 Questions for Chapter 2 22 3. The regulation and industry arrangements and practices for selling tickets 24 Introduction 24 Retailers’ incentives to sell tickets 25 Obligations on retailers to facilitate an integrated, national network 26 Governance arrangements in retailing 29 Industry rules 32 Industry processes and systems 34 Question for Chapter 3 37 4. The impact of retailers’ incentives and of retailers’ obligations to facilitate an integrated, national network 38 Introduction 38 The impact of retailers’ incentives in selling tickets 38 The impact of obligations on retailers to facilitate an integrated, national network 40 Questions for Chapter 4 44 5. The impact of industry governance, rules, processes, and systems 45 Introduction 45 The impact of industry governance arrangements 45 Office of Rail Regulation | September 2014 | Retail market review consultation 2 10866832 The impact of industry rules 47 The impact of industry processes and systems 52 Questions for Chapter 5 58 6. Emerging
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT V1.0
    FINAL REPORT v1.0 DfT - TRANSPORT DIRECT Project Support & Consultancy Services Framework FareXChange Scoping Study Project Reference - TDT / 129 June 2006 Prepared By: Prepared For: Carl Bro Group Ltd, Transport Direct Bracton House Department for Transport 34-36 High Holborn Zones 1/F18 - 1/F20 LONDON WC1V6AE Ashdown House 123 Victoria Street LONDON SW1E 6DE Tel: +44 (0)20 71901697 Fax: +44 (0)20 71901698 Email: [email protected] www.carlbro.com DfT Transport Direct FareXChange Scoping Study CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________________________________________ 6 1 INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________ 10 1.1 __ What is FareXChange? _____________________________________ 10 1.2 __ Background _______________________________________________ 10 1.3 __ Scoping Study Objectives ____________________________________ 11 1.4 __ Acknowledgments __________________________________________ 11 2 CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH ___________________________________ 12 2.1 __ Who we consulted _________________________________________ 12 2.2 __ How we consulted __________________________________________ 12 2.3 __ Overview of Results ________________________________________ 12 3 THE FARE SETTING PROCESS AND THE ROLES OF INTERESTED PARTIES _____________________________________________________________ 14 3.1 __ The Actors _______________________________________________ 14 3.2 __ Fare Stages and Fares Tables ________________________________ 16 3.3 __ Flat and Zonal Fares ________________________________________ 17
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T
    Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-01 20 Point Plan Issue14.Pdf
    Fleet Management Good Practice Guide – 20 Point Plan Issue 14 – January 2019 AMENDMENT RECORD Issue Dated Notes Section 2: MP code removed from Technical incident reasons 14 December 2018 table “701D” 14 December 2018 Inclusion of new Section 10: Managing Ageing Rolling Stock 14 December 2018 Sections new cover inserted 14 December 2018 General document sections restructure 14 December 2018 Gary Cooper’s foreword updated Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 ii Foreword Our customers’ needs have been consistent ever since the birth of the railway, whether they are passengers, or businesses that send freight by rail, and the message is simply: run my train on time. Meeting this need is a priority for all of us in rail, and the desire for on-time service delivery shows in the correlation between punctuality and customer satisfaction and, in turn, the correlation between customer satisfaction and rail businesses’ revenues. It is important therefore, for the industry and the country as well as customers that we run punctual trains. We have been failing to do this for too long. After improving performance every month from 2002 – 2011, we now repeatedly miss the punctuality levels that TOCs and NR Routes agree they will deliver. The reliability of the vehicles we operate is part of that under-delivery and we have to do better. In 2013, the fleet planned a national passenger fleet performance challenge of delivering 11 500 MTIN by March 2019, a 20% improvement in reliability over this five- year control period. The reality is that we are likely to deliver only 9 000 MTIN by then.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policy Paper
    A new structure for success on Britain’s railway An ATOC position paper on industry structural reform March 2011 / 2 1 Introduction The challenge facing the rail industry is to cut costs while continuing to improve services for passengers. The McNulty Review into value for money has identified savings of up to £1bn a year above the efficiency targets already set for Network Rail, and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) estimates that rail infrastructure costs are up to 40% higher than in Europe. The key to better value for money is a more commercial railway that releases the full potential of the private sector and puts the passenger at its heart. This means a new, ‘horses for courses’, approach in which franchises are designed around the commercial and operational realities of each route, with government intervening and specifying to lesser or greater extents, as appropriate. There have been positive steps already. The Government’s policy of longer, less prescriptive franchises creates the potential to build on the success of operators in increasing patronage and driving revenue growth by attracting more private sector investment and reducing their own costs, particularly in areas where significant efficiency improvements are not possible within a short contract. Network Rail (NR)’s plans to create devolved business units should also help the operation of trains and track to work more closely together. But the scale of cost efficiencies identified requires a real step change which can only be achieved through more fundamental reform of the railways, engendering an even stronger commercial relationship between train operator and infrastructure provider and allowing train operators to play a much bigger part in prioritising infrastructure expenditure in line with customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Rail Franchise Consultation
    Rail Delivery Group Response to: Department for Transport South Eastern Rail Franchise consultation Date: June 2017 Rail Delivery Group Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 08176197 Rail Delivery Group response to: Department for Transport South Eastern Rail Franchise consultation Organisation: Rail Delivery Group Type: Business representative organisation 1) The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) brings together Network Rail and passenger and freight train operating companies. The purpose of the RDG is to enable Network Rail and passenger and freight train operating companies to succeed by delivering better services for their customers. Ultimately this benefits taxpayers, passengers and the wider economy. We aim to meet the needs of: a) our members, by enabling them to deliver better outcomes for customers and the country; b) government and regulators, by developing strategy, informing policy and confronting difficult decisions on choices; and c) rail and non-rail users, by improving customer experience and building public trust. Overview 2) The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Department for Transport’s (DfT) consultation on the future of the South Eastern Rail Franchise. During the next South Eastern rail franchises we would like to see: a) Improvements in the understanding, measurement and delivery customer experience through the use of the ‘customer promises’ and The Customer HeartbeatTM; b) A better approach to fares and ticketing which improves simplicity and choice for customers underpinned by the Ticket Vending Machine (TVM) guidelines; and c) Effective collaboration between the infrastructure manager and the train operator through the alignment of incentives for the benefit of passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Transport for Disabled People
    House of Commons Transport Committee Access to transport for disabled people Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/transcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 September 2013 HC 116 [Incorporating HC 1002, Session 2012-13] Published on 17 September 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Sarah Champion (Labour, Rotherham) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Karen Lumley (Conservative, Redditch) Jason McCartney (Conservative, Colne Valley) Karl McCartney (Conservative, Lincoln) Lucy Powell (Labour/Co-operative, Manchester Central) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Martin Vickers (Conservative, Cleethorpes) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe), Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton), Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South), Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South), Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West), Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North), Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne), Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard, (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys), Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South), Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge), Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOSSARY Network Rail Network Rail Own, Operate And
    GLOSSARY Network Rail Network Rail own, operate and develop Britain’s railway infrastructure; that’s 20,000 miles of track, 30,000 bridges, tunnels and viaducts and the thousands of signals, level crossings and stations. They manage 20 of the UK's largest stations while all the others, over 2,500, are managed by the country’s train operating companies. Every day, more than 4.6 million journeys are made in the UK. People depend on Britain’s railway for their daily commute, to visit friends and loved ones and to get them home safe every day. Network Rail’s role in this is to deliver a safe and reliable railway, where they carefully manage and deliver thousands of projects every year that form part of the multi-billion pound Railway Upgrade Plan, to grow and expand the nation’s railway network to respond to the tremendous growth and demand the railway has experienced – a doubling of passenger journeys over the past 20 years. Rail Delivery Group (RDG) The Rail Delivery Group are the national rail body whose purpose is to provide strategic and tactical services for the whole rail industry including: A central clearing house for the train operators, enabling passengers to buy tickets to travel on any part of the rail network from any station, through the Rail Settlement Plan; A customer experience operation, covering the National Rail Enquiries service and commercial activities, such as railcards and licensing of third party retailers; The rail staff travel service, providing eligible staff in the industry with some level of concessionary travel; A planning, engineering and operations team, that supports members in delivering a safe, punctual and economic railway; A policy function, developing policy and providing responses to government consultations on behalf of the whole industry; A communications function, managing media and public affairs matters, as well as leading on national industry-wide campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Freight: Building a Stronger, Greener Future for Britain
    XXX Rail Freight: Building a Stronger, Greener Future for Britain Rail Freight: Building a Stronger, Greener XXX 1 Future for Britain XXX Foreword Foreword Foreword The national effort to keep Britain moving during the Covid pandemic has been exemplified by critical but often unnoticed essential services. The way we live, work and buy our goods changed almost overnight, but rail freight demonstrated its resilience and flexibility by continuing to deliver – keeping our supermarket shelves stacked, and warehouses fully stocked through the online shopping boom. Britain’s economy relies on quick and efficient supply chains, and the rail freight sector is growing and expanding to help meet those needs. It has been a real success of privatisation over the past 25 years with operators using their expertise and making substantial investments to increase productivity and enhance performance, helping to provide a better service for customers and delivering substantial benefits to society. New analysis conducted by Deloitte on behalf of the Rail Delivery Group strengthens This document is produced and distributed in April 2021 by the case for rail freight, by showing how it provides considerable economic and social Rail Delivery Group. benefits to the UK annually, with the north of England, Wales and Scotland among the areas seeing the greatest benefits. That means businesses all around the country have The Value of Station Investment research was conducted access to more reliable and efficient routes to markets across the world and better by Steer on behalf of Network Rail and the connectivity to ports, as well as supporting the movement of goods and materials into RDG Station Strategy Group.
    [Show full text]